Over The Top: WWI Steam Store PageNew Game announced! Add Over the Top: WWI to your Steam Wishlist!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I mean, in real life with copyright stuff. Once you allow someone to use it. You can't just take it back afterwards. You can't simply revoke someone's right to use an image after the fact, because you don't like them anymore.The artwork was clearly specifically created for coco's team, it was commissioned by coco for this very thread. Therefore he has given him implicit permission to use this artwork for this thread.Now as I highly doubt these two wrote up a contract, there is nothing that can stop coco from legally using this image.Oral agreements are still agreements and once you give someone unrestricted permission without a termination clause, they can use the image freely.To me this seems like a terrible decision from the administration team.
Quote from: Fralla8 on September 22, 2019, 12:09:34 amLit triple post enyoy ban noob Im a noob because your mad about what I post lol thats toxic as fuck and your a hypocrite to trying to team up with me with mad people your the noob kid, you wouldn't be acting this big by yourself. Go run back to your posse you pussy you ain't shit by yourself.
Lit triple post enyoy ban noob
Quote from: Rikkert on June 02, 2020, 06:37:47 pmI mean, in real life with copyright stuff. Once you allow someone to use it. You can't just take it back afterwards. You can't simply revoke someone's right to use an image after the fact, because you don't like them anymore.The artwork was clearly specifically created for coco's team, it was commissioned by coco for this very thread. Therefore he has given him implicit permission to use this artwork for this thread.Now as I highly doubt these two wrote up a contract, there is nothing that can stop coco from legally using this image.Oral agreements are still agreements and once you give someone unrestricted permission without a termination clause, they can use the image freely.To me this seems like a terrible decision from the administration team.
Quote from: Wursti on June 02, 2020, 06:41:55 pmQuote from: Rikkert on June 02, 2020, 06:37:47 pmI mean, in real life with copyright stuff. Once you allow someone to use it. You can't just take it back afterwards. You can't simply revoke someone's right to use an image after the fact, because you don't like them anymore.The artwork was clearly specifically created for coco's team, it was commissioned by coco for this very thread. Therefore he has given him implicit permission to use this artwork for this thread.Now as I highly doubt these two wrote up a contract, there is nothing that can stop coco from legally using this image.Oral agreements are still agreements and once you give someone unrestricted permission without a termination clause, they can use the image freely.To me this seems like a terrible decision from the administration team.watch out rikkert and wursti the fse logic policefuck off
I think the reasons should be made public if the warning is made public as to not confuse people or make them build their own narrative.
Quote from: Kore on June 02, 2020, 06:53:51 pmQuote from: Wursti on June 02, 2020, 06:41:55 pmQuote from: Rikkert on June 02, 2020, 06:37:47 pmI mean, in real life with copyright stuff. Once you allow someone to use it. You can't just take it back afterwards. You can't simply revoke someone's right to use an image after the fact, because you don't like them anymore.The artwork was clearly specifically created for coco's team, it was commissioned by coco for this very thread. Therefore he has given him implicit permission to use this artwork for this thread.Now as I highly doubt these two wrote up a contract, there is nothing that can stop coco from legally using this image.Oral agreements are still agreements and once you give someone unrestricted permission without a termination clause, they can use the image freely.To me this seems like a terrible decision from the administration team.watch out rikkert and wursti the fse logic policefuck offvery relevant to the discussion kore, thanks for your contribution.
Quote from: Fralla8 on June 02, 2020, 06:51:43 pmI think the reasons should be made public if the warning is made public as to not confuse people or make them build their own narrative.People can build their old narratives or be confused all they want, that still doesn't mean they are in position to make any demands. Only Coco is entitled to some proper explanations if he wishes too and I suppose if he wants to share that publicly afterwards, it's his right too. You are free to debate obviously, if you got nothing better to do.
