Spoiler
The problem with that is I'm sure Jammo's team would consist of a lot of players that Hercules would also accept into the team. The team from that screenshot isn't the final team that will play in the tournament.
Then why don't you just inform all the players concerned that there will be a match bewteen two potential GB team and that they should join the team they want to be represented by?
Why not have Jammo forming his team, the other guys (no offense but I don't really quite know who they're) forming their team aswell, and having both teams playing a match to see which formations comes on top of it? That would potentially save some drama.
Not gonna lie but this is the most retarded thing I've ever heard of in my life. What would that prove please tell me? Who can get the better GB players to play for them? If you're not involved, please stay out of it, kthx.
Votes have happened and i'm sort-of surprised I got GB Cpt. Now, children, let's all behave and wait for Rommel and Cazasar and then we can all complain.
That would prove that there is a team which is simply better than the other and deserve to play the tournament.
Yeah buts whos to say some people on the losing team wouldnt be capable of having a place on the winning team despite this? Its Team GB. Shouldnt just be which British group of friends is better gets to play, it should be just the best group of British players even if they fucking despise eachother.
People on the losing team even if better than some of those on winning likely wont get a spot and it wont be the best possible team. Fucking dumb tbh that this is being considered and argued for as if those who would be on Jammo's team really cared they'd have applied to play in the first place and voted for Jammo.
I'm not from the inside so I can't judge on facts I do not have. But votes are always easy to manipulate, pretty much the same things than having some important decision about tournaments being voted on FSE, like it was the case some years ago.
To me, it just seems like some people are trying to involve some sort of 'NW politics' while this tournament is supposed to have the best team from each nation, with the best players in it. If a team wins on the field, that means they're better, not much you can argue about.
We have been going through this with the French Team already, and at one point, having one match between the two formations seemed like the fairest idea for a large majority. I'm just sharing a little bit of experience to help solving a drama which could potentially takes a hundred page without evolving at all.
Yet again Maurice said things are trying to be solved through steam, so lets see how this goes
