Messages

1

General Discussion / Re: Fun events with your own regiment

« on: May 02, 2013, 06:48:45 am »

No Fun Allowed

damn can i join your reg brh

2

Regiments / Re: 19te Prussian Infantry - Recruiting Worldwide

« on: April 10, 2013, 06:42:23 am »

work sleep work sleep work minecraft sleep work sleep work crpg sleep work

3

Regiments / Re: 3éme Régiment d'Infanterie Légère "3eVolt" [Recruiting active mature players]

« on: April 10, 2013, 06:34:09 am »

unofficial, but we still pwnt

4

General Discussion / Re: Getting a high score counts for nothing

« on: March 31, 2013, 05:53:20 am »

press tab
press f12
?
profit

5

Regiments / Re: 3éme Régiment d'Infanterie Légère "3eVolt" [Recruiting skilled American players]

« on: March 24, 2013, 09:23:04 pm »

actually dat shot by that KPR dude, like 20 kills with canister shot O_O

damn, too bad I was out of town =/

6

Regiments / Re: 3éme Régiment d'Infanterie Légère "3eVolt" [Recruiting skilled American players]

« on: March 22, 2013, 09:44:42 pm »

What in the name of hitorical accuracy are you!

We are the Grandee French army of the République démocratique du Congo

Spoiler

[close]

7

Regiments / Re: 3éme Régiment d'Infanterie Légère "3eVolt" [Recruiting skilled American players]

« on: March 21, 2013, 08:46:43 pm »

The 48th were talking shit about us last week. How about them

8

Regiments / Re: 3éme Régiment d'Infanterie Légère "3eVolt" [Recruiting skilled American players]

« on: March 18, 2013, 03:51:16 am »

3eVolt, I said hi. 

hai

9

Historical Discussion / Re: Favourite Napoleonic Commanders

« on: March 18, 2013, 03:43:34 am »

How about NEHPOLEAAAAUN!

Lasalle    Pity he was killed at Wagram.

sauce on your signature(sent PM)

10

Historical Discussion / Re: Great Armies, which was your favorite?

« on: March 18, 2013, 03:36:50 am »

If you seriously think the Chinese military is even remotely close to a match for the modern US military, you're off your rocker, but I guess we already knew that.

To suggest North Korea's miserably equipped, badly trained, malnourished, terribly lead, backwards military is threat to anyone besides themselves is flat out insane.

9,495,000 active, reserve, and paramilitary personnel, I don't care if they have clubs, that is a threat to smaller countries at the very least.

“Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered automatic weapons.”
― Douglas MacArthur

touche

11

Historical Discussion / Re: VIVA LA FRAANCE(Napoleonic War Surgery procedure)

« on: March 18, 2013, 03:35:40 am »

Never really did like French.

You don't have to like it to know the difference between French and Spanish.

Good to see the on topic posts.

12

Historical Discussion / Re: Most elite fighting forces of history From the beginning of time-19th Century

« on: March 18, 2013, 03:33:42 am »

I think he was joking, guys.

lol thank you

13

Historical Discussion / Re: Why did Napoleon Wage War

« on: March 18, 2013, 03:32:49 am »

They were still able to, and did, kill innocent civilians. Just like in any war.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contest_to_kill_100_people_using_a_sword


War. Good stuff.

14

Historical Discussion / Re: Writing a book

« on: March 16, 2013, 08:36:12 pm »

I intend to finish it, but it was pretty dry the first couple chapters, so I am reading a few other books first.

Also, OP, how's the book coming

15

Historical Discussion / Re: Why did Napoleon Wage War

« on: March 16, 2013, 08:31:07 pm »

It's not really fair to say that Napoleon's desire was just to make Europe better. Thousands of civilians were killed by French imperial troops.

True, but the same can be said about all armies back then, lije us Brits, we famously pillaged, looted, raped, and committed other atrosities in the Peninsula, Badajoz and Ciuad Rodrigo being the most horrible.

Back then? Even today. Bombs are indiscriminate.