Poll

Weapon?

Sword!
84 (24.9%)
Musket!
174 (51.6%)
Pike!
79 (23.4%)

Total Members Voted: 334

Author Topic: The Century of War (Serverfiles are available)  (Read 199687 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wismar

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 3838
  • Med Gud o' Sveas allmoge för Konung och Fosterland
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Radical
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #210 on: November 05, 2013, 10:24:19 pm »
In the Napoleonic Wars only 1/4 of all soldiers that died in combat were shot down. The rest was mostly killed in melee and some got killed by artillery fire. And in the early 17th Century the muskets were less accurate. I think maybe 1/6-1/10 died by musket shots ...
And will there musket missfires be integrated?
I very much doubt that there were more melee kills than musket kills during the NWs since bayonet charges barely happened. Where do you get these facts from?

Offline Archduke Sven

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 6012
  • I have over 1000 warning points, be careful.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: regimentless sven
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #211 on: November 05, 2013, 10:52:03 pm »
In the Napoleonic Wars only 1/4 of all soldiers that died in combat were shot down. The rest was mostly killed in melee and some got killed by artillery fire. And in the early 17th Century the muskets were less accurate. I think maybe 1/6-1/10 died by musket shots ...
And will there musket missfires be integrated?

....

That is just incredibly wrong, i can't remember the exact numbers but 5% of all casualties where from bayonets, 60% from artillerymuskets and 25% musket balls Artillery and 10% sabres.

Bayonet charges usually ended up with one side running away immediatly before or upon contact with the charging enemy, which meant that most of a 'bayonet charge' was done with musket fire. It was extremely rare for two units to fight eachother in melee in open ground and only really happened if the defending side was in field fortifications. Same with pikemen, the side that was the most determined held ground/pressed on the attack, and the side who was the least determined fled.

This man explains it very well:
Spoiler
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKRa966S5Dc[/youtube]
[close]

edit: Put the wrong percentage for the wrong arm.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2013, 10:56:17 pm by Archduke_Sven »


told that bih don't @ me

Offline Docm30

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Retired.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #212 on: November 05, 2013, 10:52:55 pm »
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he got them from an inaccurate source and didn't just make them up.

The respected historian John A. Lynn states that the best evidence suggests about two-thirds of Napoleonic combat wounds were caused by musket fire and around 2% by bayonets. André Corvisirer states that of the inmates at the Invalides in 1715, over 70% had musket wounds and fewer than 3% had bayonet wounds. Larrey, Napoleon's surgeon general, recorded similar numbers.

Artillery didn't begin to cause the majority of casualties in European-style warfare until WW1.

I have no idea how this relates to the early 17th century, but I'm just here to correct what needs correcting.

Offline Willhelm

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 1850
    • View Profile
    • Blood&Iron
  • Nick: 32nd_Gdm_William
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #213 on: November 05, 2013, 11:50:45 pm »
I dont think it's the same with pikemen, they would press against each other in a "push of pike" with the men behind pushing forward, eventually one sides formation collapsed. A deep formation worked much better than a wide one for this reason, and apparently you didn't thrust your pike, you just walked it into them. Theres some debate over how effect the armour was and whether or not the first ranks would all be killed in the initial impact though.

Offline CharlesVasser

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2418
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #214 on: November 06, 2013, 08:29:21 am »
One does not simply make a thread without starting an argument.

Offline SeanBeansShako

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3185
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #215 on: November 06, 2013, 01:11:29 pm »
I wish these forums were moderated. I get tired of reading mod threads for news about said mods and skipping 2-3 pages of needless arguments.


Offline Feldsau

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 440
    • View Profile
  • Nick: [DL]III_KBR_O_Feldsau
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #216 on: November 06, 2013, 03:36:39 pm »
So and you are the obligatory flamers, every mod thread needs? What´s so wrong about the discussion, it´s no off topic spam but a debate about the warfare in this time period and the possible transfer into the gameplay...

Offline Waterbeetle

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 183
  • 0100100001100001
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Volumed
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #217 on: November 06, 2013, 04:30:17 pm »
Discussions are fine, if we keep it civilized ofcourse.

Offline BSM 'Shut up' Williams

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 2819
  • Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna!
    • View Profile
    • My Twitter
  • Nick: Jean Grande
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #218 on: November 06, 2013, 04:48:42 pm »
I wish these forums were moderated. I get tired of reading mod threads for news about said mods and skipping 2-3 pages of needless arguments.

+1

Steam Profile Signature
[close]

Offline Archduke Sven

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 6012
  • I have over 1000 warning points, be careful.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: regimentless sven
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #219 on: November 06, 2013, 06:17:19 pm »
I wish these forums were moderated. I get tired of reading mod threads for news about said mods and skipping 2-3 pages of needless arguments.

I'm tired of people whining.


told that bih don't @ me

Offline KArantukki

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 920
  • Chaotic Evil
    • View Profile
  • Nick: KArantukki
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #220 on: November 06, 2013, 06:29:30 pm »
There was the question about the amount of pikemen and musketeers in the armies. In one of my books there is a line about the swedish army of Gustav II. Adolf:

"The Infantry was organized in battalions, each battalion had four companies, in each company there were 72 musketeers and 54 pikemen."

Offline Archduke Sven

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 6012
  • I have over 1000 warning points, be careful.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: regimentless sven
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #221 on: November 06, 2013, 06:45:09 pm »
There was the question about the amount of pikemen and musketeers in the armies. In one of my books there is a line about the swedish army of Gustav II. Adolf:

"The Infantry was organized in battalions, each battalion had four companies, in each company there were 72 musketeers and 54 pikemen."

Which time of the war? It varied depending on year, with the formations at the end of the war having many more musketeers than pikes. Well since you're saying Gustav II Adolf's army i take it you mean 1629-32?

By the way, Battle of Lutzen/Gustav II Adolfs death was 381 years ago today.


told that bih don't @ me

Offline KArantukki

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 920
  • Chaotic Evil
    • View Profile
  • Nick: KArantukki
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #222 on: November 06, 2013, 06:52:32 pm »
There was the question about the amount of pikemen and musketeers in the armies. In one of my books there is a line about the swedish army of Gustav II. Adolf:

"The Infantry was organized in battalions, each battalion had four companies, in each company there were 72 musketeers and 54 pikemen."

Which time of the war? It varied depending on year, with the formations at the end of the war having many more musketeers than pikes. Well since you're saying Gustav II Adolf's army i take it you mean 1629-32?

By the way, Battle of Lutzen/Gustav II Adolfs death was 381 years ago today.

I think it was in the first years when he begann to reform his army, so before the swedish intervention in the thirty years war.

Offline KArantukki

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 920
  • Chaotic Evil
    • View Profile
  • Nick: KArantukki
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #223 on: November 09, 2013, 09:33:11 pm »
A screenshot of a new map, you can see some new wall props.

Spoiler
[close]

Offline BSM 'Shut up' Williams

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 2819
  • Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna!
    • View Profile
    • My Twitter
  • Nick: Jean Grande
  • Side: Union
Re: [NW|M] The Century of War (17th Century mod)
« Reply #224 on: November 09, 2013, 09:55:48 pm »
Amaizing!

Steam Profile Signature
[close]