Question, is this list based on tournaments outside the most recent one? If it's based on the last tournament's performance, the list should be a lot different, I've seen people being rated high than the previous update when they performed worse in the last tournament, unless there's some wizardry I'm not quite understanding...
If Snappers managed to almost win a tournament, with some incredible performance from players like Nightwing, it seems quite rogue seeing Renegades players once again gain higher ratings, yet had scores of like 5 - 20 outside of Bagins and Cody (Cody did exceptionally well towards the end) and Snappers players once again, staying in similar places to where they were before, why is that? I'm assuming this has to do with group stages, because performance in knockouts was quite appalling. If ratings are based on 'word of mouth' from 'better' players, then what's the point in pretending it's based on tournament performances?
my man Reaps going off sheeesh
My mans Reaps hasn't performed in the last four tournaments, complete delusion.
The list isn't actually 'terrible'; it's just clear biased delusion based on some shite kill compilations or friends of the players - seeing Marxiels ORIGINAL list before it was posted here, these same players weren't even rated as high as they are now, which I mainly agreed with, but somehow ended up 5 points higher, absolutely insane...