Quick point about FiC, as throughout this season I have seen different refs enforcing it differently.
In the thread opening post under ref FAQ for fic:
Spoiler
First, you do nothing special. You note the name and watch how the round ends. Did the FIC change the outcome of the round? E.g. victim lost 2 men because of FiC and lost in a close charge - in this case, round has to be redone. E.g. FIC where the rule breaker already had 10 men advantage after shootout - in this case, you slay the respective person FiCing in the next round. Of course the regiment may not swap him out. If he does anyways, just slay any other ranker. In the end, the rule breaking regiment has to play at a disadvantage next round.
Half the refs (This may be an exaggeration but it is at least several judging by peoples vids) slay instantly for FiC which breaks this guideline (I believe this rule may have changed from previous seasons without some refs realising!), others slay that person in the next round and I almost never see a round redone, regiments just having to live with the round loss and a fic warning.
I post this in the hope that more consistency can be achieved across all refs, whatever rules/guidelines the organizers choose
p.s - as an example last season when I was a ref, I would warn the reg about FiC once, then slay fic'er in the next round if I didn't judge the kill to affect the outcome (otherwise a reset would be required). In my experience it worked as a better deterrent than a 50/50 chance of either an instant slay or a warning which happens with some admins still. Again I'm not trying to point anyone out, simply hoping that we can have greater consistency between refs.
