Author Topic: NWL - League 2 [Post results here!]  (Read 114581 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John Price

  • Block guys what is this!?
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 21392
  • Destroyer of RGL
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #120 on: June 10, 2016, 05:01:50 pm »
That rule in my opinion is the most under enforced. The amount of times you see regiments run away from shots with 5 man spacing etc. or making 4 man spacing on the move is insane.

At the same time though who cares. If they have big gaps on the move and you don't, you form up quicker.
Knightmare is from Albania, no?
Sorry, I can't accept this team.

Offline DasBrot

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1076
  • Inventor of NWL, Leader of 6te
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #121 on: June 11, 2016, 01:29:03 pm »
That rule in my opinion is the most under enforced. The amount of times you see regiments run away from shots with 5 man spacing etc. or making 4 man spacing on the move is insane.

At the same time though who cares. If they have big gaps on the move and you don't, you form up quicker.

Thats most likely because its a new rule and not easy to enforce. I too struggle at that one. Then, a referees view and opinion might differ from that of an officer the most in that one.
1b.1 A formation is a tight line, with gaps tightly closed when standing, and with gaps not bigger than 2 men average while moving.
 
Is this rule still working?

And yes, of course it is still in use.

Offline wilu_daskar

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 271
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #122 on: June 11, 2016, 02:18:07 pm »
And yes, of course it is still in use.

Thanks for answer.

I will ask to compare the following:

Good line (have copied this from the DasBrot message in the main thread)
Spoiler
[close]

Rulebraking line (same)
Spoiler
[close]

Lines we have in last NWL match vs 44th (sorry for bug with austrian uniforms - some graphic modifications :D)
Spoiler
[close]

What could you say about lines in the 3rd screenshot?

« Last Edit: June 11, 2016, 02:19:45 pm by wilu_daskar »


Offline Toffee

  • King in the North
  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 5365
  • Ex 77y Pfc, 93rd Private and 18e Grenadier
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #123 on: June 11, 2016, 02:21:48 pm »
Maybe a good idea would be to have a council of referees to vote on any disputed decision. As long as a team provides video evidence of what happened and the refs come to a majority the game or round could be replayed at a later date.

Offline Wolfster

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 4367
  • 44th best th
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #124 on: June 11, 2016, 02:28:08 pm »
Spoiler
And yes, of course it is still in use.

Thanks for answer.

I will ask to compare the following:

Good line (have copied this from the DasBrot message in the main thread)
Spoiler
[close]

Rulebraking line (same)
Spoiler
[close]

Lines we have in last NWL match vs 44th (sorry for bug with austrian uniforms - some graphic modifications :D)
Spoiler
[close]

What could you say about lines in the 3rd screenshot?
[close]
As you can see, for the most part, our line was close together. It isn't particularly easy keeping the spacings equal if you are reversing every 10 seconds. You shouldn't just be blaming it on us. You were doing the same thing.



If you really want to get me started, I can mention the invites you had. But I thought I'd respect you guys by letting it slip.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2016, 02:34:23 pm by Wolfster »


Offline DasBrot

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1076
  • Inventor of NWL, Leader of 6te
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #125 on: June 11, 2016, 03:19:33 pm »
And yes, of course it is still in use.

Thanks for answer.

I will ask to compare the following:

Good line (have copied this from the DasBrot message in the main thread)
Spoiler
[close]

Rulebraking line (same)
Spoiler
[close]

Lines we have in last NWL match vs 44th (sorry for bug with austrian uniforms - some graphic modifications :D)
Spoiler
[close]

What could you say about lines in the 3rd screenshot?

In the screenshot, the front part is good, the rear part is not good. As a referee, I would remind them of the rule but nothing more.

Offline wilu_daskar

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 271
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #126 on: June 11, 2016, 04:01:37 pm »
In the screenshot, the front part is good, the rear part is not good. As a referee, I would remind them of the rule but nothing more.

Thanks for answer. And if this happens again and again?


Offline bruno73

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 846
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Stanislas_Lefort
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #127 on: June 11, 2016, 09:18:15 pm »
gg 5-5 against 61e. Some fic but it didn't troubled rounds issues

Offline huanmpth

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2028
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 61e_Lt_huanmpth
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #128 on: June 11, 2016, 09:23:28 pm »
gg 5-5 against 61e. Some fic but it didn't troubled rounds issues

Good job but lost need more experience in my opinion.


Offline Wolfster

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 4367
  • 44th best th
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #129 on: June 14, 2016, 09:32:11 pm »
44th 7 - 3 Saints

Good job :P I'd focus on camping less - might prove you better.


Offline Wüstenfuchs

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 683
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Nr12_Lt_Clemens_Friebe
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #130 on: June 14, 2016, 09:46:52 pm »
33rd 5 - 5 44th

good game, nearly no rulebreaks apart from one little FiC of each side

Offline Munj

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 653
  • Steam name: [63e] Munj
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 63e_Cpt_Munj
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #131 on: June 15, 2016, 12:23:50 am »
Maybe a good idea would be to have a council of referees to vote on any disputed decision. As long as a team provides video evidence of what happened and the refs come to a majority the game or round could be replayed at a later date.

Too impractical, time consuming and generally inefficient. Also getting matches done is hard enough as it is, let alone replaying rounds over retrospective discussion. They don't do this in sports (e.g. Football) because it just wouldn't be conducive to fluid play.

Offline Wolfster

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 4367
  • 44th best th
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #132 on: June 15, 2016, 08:58:34 am »
And add a camping timer -_- xD


Offline bruno73

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 846
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Stanislas_Lefort
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #133 on: June 15, 2016, 09:05:35 am »
And add a camping timer -_- xD
There was a rule in last editions which restricted the camp time under than 5 minutes. Also, there was like 7 or 10 volleys maximum to don't favorise the camp.

Offline Wolfster

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 4367
  • 44th best th
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: NWL - League 2
« Reply #134 on: June 15, 2016, 06:30:33 pm »
And add a camping timer -_- xD
There was a rule in last editions which restricted the camp time under than 5 minutes. Also, there was like 7 or 10 volleys maximum to don't favorise the camp.
That rule should come back