Author Topic: Why Second Lieutenant?  (Read 2067 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sddwe1

  • Corporal
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • I'm more dead than NW mods.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: ~[FH]~Sweedle
  • Side: Neutral
Why Second Lieutenant?
« on: November 14, 2013, 03:10:48 am »
I noticed today, that the forum rank below lieutenant was second lieutenant, a rank used exclusively in rifle regiments, so I put two and two together, and am now adamant that the forums are a rifle regiment- based ranking system.

Offline McEwan

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 3530
  • "McEwok" "McScrubwin" "ManJewban" "McWeewan"
    • View Profile
    • Marins de la Garde Impériale on Enjin!
  • Nick: IXe[Marins]_McEwan
  • Side: Union
Re: Why Second Lieutenant?
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2013, 03:15:10 am »
Remember that these are US Army ranks, not 19th century British army ranks. The 2nd Lieutenant rank is actually in the regular US army command structure.


Kielbasa!

Offline Commissar Jdf

  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 3076
    • View Profile
  • Nick: USMC_Maj_CommissarJdf
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Why Second Lieutenant?
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2013, 04:44:33 am »
Remember that these are US Army ranks, not 19th century British army ranks. The 2nd Lieutenant rank is actually in the regular US army command structure.

Who likes US Army anyway? :s fuckin' butterbars

Offline McEwan

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 3530
  • "McEwok" "McScrubwin" "ManJewban" "McWeewan"
    • View Profile
    • Marins de la Garde Impériale on Enjin!
  • Nick: IXe[Marins]_McEwan
  • Side: Union
Re: Why Second Lieutenant?
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2013, 04:45:54 am »
Now now, let's not start any inter-branch rivalries here. :D


Kielbasa!

Offline Audiate

  • World's Worst
  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 9784
  • FREEZE, PUNK!
    • View Profile
  • Nick: the mic rula; the old schoola
  • Side: Union
Re: Why Second Lieutenant?
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2013, 04:50:30 am »
Now now, let's not start any inter-branch rivalries here. :D

Start? I thought they've been around for a while. :P

Offline McEwan

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 3530
  • "McEwok" "McScrubwin" "ManJewban" "McWeewan"
    • View Profile
    • Marins de la Garde Impériale on Enjin!
  • Nick: IXe[Marins]_McEwan
  • Side: Union
Re: Why Second Lieutenant?
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2013, 04:53:25 am »
I meant here here, as in on the forums/thread.


Kielbasa!

Offline Commissar Jdf

  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 3076
    • View Profile
  • Nick: USMC_Maj_CommissarJdf
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Why Second Lieutenant?
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2013, 04:54:56 am »
not for the faint of heart
[close]

Offline McEwan

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 3530
  • "McEwok" "McScrubwin" "ManJewban" "McWeewan"
    • View Profile
    • Marins de la Garde Impériale on Enjin!
  • Nick: IXe[Marins]_McEwan
  • Side: Union
Re: Why Second Lieutenant?
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2013, 04:56:26 am »
I should just lock this thread now to prevent the political discussion that will inevitably spring up at some point due to that image. :P


Kielbasa!

Offline Commissar Jdf

  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 3076
    • View Profile
  • Nick: USMC_Maj_CommissarJdf
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Why Second Lieutenant?
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2013, 04:56:44 am »
I should just lock this thread now to prevent the political discussion that will inevitably spring up at some point. :P

Go ahead, it's kind of a worthless one anyway.

Offline McEwan

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 3530
  • "McEwok" "McScrubwin" "ManJewban" "McWeewan"
    • View Profile
    • Marins de la Garde Impériale on Enjin!
  • Nick: IXe[Marins]_McEwan
  • Side: Union
Re: Why Second Lieutenant?
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2013, 04:57:24 am »
Eh, true. If the OP has any more questions, you can PM me.


Kielbasa!