Author Topic: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]  (Read 32297 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mathias

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2127
  • 1st place 1v1 and a little more since I forgot
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #165 on: November 04, 2013, 03:35:47 am »
Seems like things are working well inside here?  ;)

Offline Coldstream Captain Thomas

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 436
  • 12e_Sdt_Coldstream
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Captain Thomas Clayworth
  • Side: Union
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #166 on: November 04, 2013, 03:43:31 am »
Seems like things are working well inside here?  ;)
Well, with our full roster now at 23, you could say that  :D
Define 'looks skinny', because last time I checked, you're morbidly obese lel

Offline Coldstream

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 95
  • Blame it on lag
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 19e_Arty_Coldstream
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #167 on: November 04, 2013, 04:10:35 am »
That quote makes me laugh every time.

Offline Coldstream Captain Thomas

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 436
  • 12e_Sdt_Coldstream
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Captain Thomas Clayworth
  • Side: Union
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #168 on: November 04, 2013, 04:13:28 am »
That quote makes me laugh every time.
When I see you tomorrow your so dead  ;)
On a side note, I can litteraly not get over how FUCKING AWESOME it is too have someone who has a ton of Fallout 3 sounds on their soundboard, just g fucking g
Define 'looks skinny', because last time I checked, you're morbidly obese lel

Offline Coldstream

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 95
  • Blame it on lag
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 19e_Arty_Coldstream
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #169 on: November 04, 2013, 04:16:13 am »
It's playing in lb's from now on. No questions asked.

Offline asjklt

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 324
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #170 on: November 04, 2013, 04:57:34 am »

Current Agenda Of The Regiment.
-Fix the trolling
I question your definition of trolling

Offline Coldstream Captain Thomas

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 436
  • 12e_Sdt_Coldstream
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Captain Thomas Clayworth
  • Side: Union
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #171 on: November 04, 2013, 05:02:57 am »

Current Agenda Of The Regiment.
-Fix the trolling
I question your definition of trolling
Kicking, Punching, putting on wrong tags on purpose, not listening to officers, Hiding behind people in line while getting shot at, acting like a dick in teamspeak, refusing to come to events for no reason, and I could go on.
It describes you exactly as to what you did tonight.
Define 'looks skinny', because last time I checked, you're morbidly obese lel

Offline Coldstream Captain Thomas

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 436
  • 12e_Sdt_Coldstream
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Captain Thomas Clayworth
  • Side: Union
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #172 on: November 04, 2013, 05:11:46 am »
Happy to announce our partnership with the ☭ Preobrazhensky Infantry Regiment ☭
Define 'looks skinny', because last time I checked, you're morbidly obese lel

Offline asjklt

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 324
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #173 on: November 04, 2013, 05:39:33 am »
I kick or punch people for either a spot in line or they made me mad. I didn't punch a single person. I forgot what the tags were and I hadn't been in the teamspeak channel to know what they were and when I had asked for them through steam I got no reply. I didn't put my bayonet in my musket because I would rather be able to swing it 4 ways than to poke it in only 2 ways. I do swear I did make that battle cry by accident but there was no reason why we shouldn't make one. I hid behind trees because why not? There there and their a part of the map, it's just like using a hill as a shield. I hid behind other people so I didn't get shot. Which also brings up that the round where I did hide behind trees an others is the same map where me and my "troll" friend went a combined 5-1 in melee and I won it for us. I wasn't acting like a "dick" in teamspeak, I was simply arguing, asking questions, or giving suggestions. I was refusing to come to an event because I had already come to one that day and I wanted to watch football and text my girlfriend. Also having an event everyday is why some people don't play the game, I sometimes just want to go on a server and acutely practice my melee or something because apparently melee isn't important in trainings. My friend that's apparently a "troll" was for a short time of maybe a month, one of the best among NW in melee (sadly he stopped playing), but he came about that because his regiment had melee in all of their training and over 6 months he got better and better until he was that good. Just think if everyone in the regiment did that. Formations and all can be useful but it's the real small things as of lining up a couple seconds faster by forming on either sides of the officer to get the first shot, or taking shot across the map and getting a kill to get the glory or self energy. And most of what I was doing was simply trying to have fun, either me and jack or the only mature ones or were the only ones that don't scream and yell when were hiding in a cornfield. Even If I am only 13 years old, if I yell like that my dad will ground me or something. Ive also never seen a really fun charge or epic win or anything, that's my whole goal when leading is to mix winning with fun, if u win people will be happy and if you have fun then people will be happy. If you look good to other regiments, what does it matter, being happy compared to what other regiments think of you is just not right. I'm just trying to make fun of what's not there.

Also if you have any other complaints I will be happy to fulfill them

Offline Seagull

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • Cavalry Soldier of the 4e Hussars
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Seagull
  • Side: Union
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #174 on: November 04, 2013, 08:37:54 am »
I kick or punch people for either a spot in line or they made me mad. I didn't punch a single person. I forgot what the tags were and I hadn't been in the teamspeak channel to know what they were and when I had asked for them through steam I got no reply. I didn't put my bayonet in my musket because I would rather be able to swing it 4 ways than to poke it in only 2 ways. I do swear I did make that battle cry by accident but there was no reason why we shouldn't make one. I hid behind trees because why not? There there and their a part of the map, it's just like using a hill as a shield. I hid behind other people so I didn't get shot. Which also brings up that the round where I did hide behind trees an others is the same map where me and my "troll" friend went a combined 5-1 in melee and I won it for us. I wasn't acting like a "dick" in teamspeak, I was simply arguing, asking questions, or giving suggestions. I was refusing to come to an event because I had already come to one that day and I wanted to watch football and text my girlfriend. Also having an event everyday is why some people don't play the game, I sometimes just want to go on a server and acutely practice my melee or something because apparently melee isn't important in trainings. My friend that's apparently a "troll" was for a short time of maybe a month, one of the best among NW in melee (sadly he stopped playing), but he came about that because his regiment had melee in all of their training and over 6 months he got better and better until he was that good. Just think if everyone in the regiment did that. Formations and all can be useful but it's the real small things as of lining up a couple seconds faster by forming on either sides of the officer to get the first shot, or taking shot across the map and getting a kill to get the glory or self energy. And most of what I was doing was simply trying to have fun, either me and jack or the only mature ones or were the only ones that don't scream and yell when were hiding in a cornfield. Even If I am only 13 years old, if I yell like that my dad will ground me or something. Ive also never seen a really fun charge or epic win or anything, that's my whole goal when leading is to mix winning with fun, if u win people will be happy and if you have fun then people will be happy. If you look good to other regiments, what does it matter, being happy compared to what other regiments think of you is just not right. I'm just trying to make fun of what's not there.

Also if you have any other complaints I will be happy to fulfill them

Very nice speech, son.

Offline Seagull

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • Cavalry Soldier of the 4e Hussars
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Seagull
  • Side: Union
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #175 on: November 04, 2013, 08:42:48 am »
And we need to update the front page to say we are an NA/EU regiment.

Offline Coldstream Captain Thomas

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 436
  • 12e_Sdt_Coldstream
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Captain Thomas Clayworth
  • Side: Union
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #176 on: November 04, 2013, 12:07:44 pm »
And we need to update the front page to say we are an NA/EU regiment.
Adding that in after school  ;)
I would like to remind everyone of our N&S linebattle video. [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBsSsFTrfXs[/youtube]
Define 'looks skinny', because last time I checked, you're morbidly obese lel

Offline 85thColonel

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 210
  • 48th Highlanders of Canada Colonel
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 48thHoC_Col_McGordon
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #177 on: November 04, 2013, 01:12:59 pm »
YAY the video of me leading!!!

Offline Coldstream

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 95
  • Blame it on lag
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 19e_Arty_Coldstream
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #178 on: November 04, 2013, 09:46:32 pm »
I love how nobody probably read that, Atam.

Offline Coldstream Captain Thomas

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 436
  • 12e_Sdt_Coldstream
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Captain Thomas Clayworth
  • Side: Union
Re: 89th Regiment of Foot - 1st Company - "The Royal Battalion" [NA/EU]
« Reply #179 on: November 04, 2013, 09:48:53 pm »
I love how nobody probably read that, Atam.
To be honest, i'm not reading it for the fact that its too much to read.
Define 'looks skinny', because last time I checked, you're morbidly obese lel