What of What i wrote let you thought this?
What you said looked like an easy way to dismiss all criticism, without actually dealing with any of it. (it does not matter what you guys post, they can decide themselves). I was just voicing my opinion, it was not an attempt to influence them to change their decision.
National Communitys is a undefined term on purpose as questions like that depend on the certain case. So in your example: If you and Gi decide to merge and your teams are with you, yes it would be possible in General but you need to keep in mind why we do coalitions at all: to allow nations to play that cant Form a Team on their own (for any reason), (this my Friend is why your Team exists at all so you should understand that.) but GB/IRE and BL/NL are already able to Form a Team on their own so here coalition would be denied in the end.
First of all, the NL/BE coalition is not why my team exists. I can field a 100% dutch team easily. The coalition was made to give the Belgian players a chance to play. Same with GB/IRE and same with CIS/CZSK. I understand why you would deny a GB/NL coalition, that was more of a joke.
But if "allowing nations to play that can't otherwise form" is the criteria, then any random small Eastern European nation could say: "We want to be part of CIS. Regardless of what language we speak, regardless of the fact that we have nothing in common and that our nations are 500 km apart. " (i'm not saying that this is the case with CIS/CZSK) Still, what I'm trying to say is that the rules that you apply to this coalition stuff seem to be highly arbitrary. This leads to people complaining on the forums. Which it did, and then you dismissed the complaints by quoting a rule. I just thought that was odd, which is why I asked for clarification.
