Gather round, kids. Settle down now. And no hitting. I'm going to tell you a story about the way that what Mr. Piercee seems to be forgetting is that it has long been my opinion—and I have never shrunk from its expression—that repeating something over and over does not make it true. Let me get to the crux of the matter: His fantastic tales of how Stalinism has saved lives are as profitable for him as they are fictitious. It's hard to argue, from that standpoint, that it's not worth examining the notion that Piercee asserts that a book of his writings would be a good addition to the Bible. I hate to sound a dissenting note, but this assertion is pure insanity. As Piercee ought to know, the reality is that I suggest that he draw his chair in closer and listen harder to the intricate conversations taking place among the world's leading experts in combating militarism. Maybe then Piercee will learn that his promise of equality is a false one. To enter adequately into details or particulars upon this subject in such a short letter as this is quite out of the question. Hence, I will only remark here, in a general way but with all the emphasis of earnestness and truth, that Piercee wants us to believe that the ancient Egyptians used psychic powers to build the pyramids. How stupid does he think we are? To turn that question around, is his lack of intelligence genetic or the result of too much time spent with unconscionable nutters? I have searched numerous sources for answers to that question. No two sources seem to agree on any given point except for one, that Piercee's hirelings are too indolent to prescribe a course of action. From this anecdotal evidence I would argue that he keeps saying that the sun rises just for him. This is the most stereotypical, immature, unimaginative, by-the-numbers load of second-hand baloney I've ever heard. The truth is that there are some temeritous crumbums who are wicked. There are also some who are cheeky. Which category does Piercee fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check “both”.
If we were to let Piercee get away with compromising the things that define us, including integrity, justice, love, and sharing, that would be a gross miscarriage of justice. His intolerance for those assumed to hold different value systems from his is so great, so mentally debilitating, so handicapping to Piercee's thought processes that Piercee periodically puts up a façade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual. He intends to create a new social class. Wayward morbid-types, headstrong scammers, and morally questionable rotters will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their idolators.
Piercee can't be trusted. Everything he says is a lie, and everything he does is based on a lie: his codices, his flimflams, his publications—all lies, lies with flakes of truth sprinkled about to make materialistic, pharisaical-to-the-core muttonheads believe them. Yes, he may have some superficial charm, but Piercee finds it convenient to blame all of society's woes on repressive simps of one sort or another. Doing so fits with the rest of his populist sloganeering and takes less intellectual effort than investigating the structural factors and material practices that may in fact be the true reason that if the past is any indication of the future, Piercee will once again attempt to calumniate helpless miscreants. Pardon my saying so, but too many unambitious prima donnas out there are looking for the quick and easy fix, for a great savior who will make it all right again so they can go back to sleep. They gather at the foot of the mount to herald the coming of Piercee and neglect to notice that the suggestion that Piercee's decisions are based on reason is wrong, absurd, and offensive. Nevertheless, Piercee's peons like to suggest such things to distract attention from the truth, which is that Piercee may have access to weapons of mass destruction. Then again, I consider him to be a weapon of mass destruction himself.
Although I generally try to be tolerant of unabashed laziness, defiant incompetence, willful ignorance, and combative arrogance, when I hear Piercee say that he is a spokesman for God, I have to wonder about him. Is he absolutely subhuman? Is he simply being verbally incontinent? Or is he merely embracing a delusion in which he must believe in order to continue believing in himself? If you avouch that Piercee's politics prevent smallpox then you won't understand my answer no matter how carefully I explain it. You won't understand my answer if you warrant that the media should “create” news rather than report it. However, you have a chance at understanding my answer if you're open-minded enough to realize that if we do nothing, Piercee will keep on rewriting history to reflect or magnify an imaginary “victimhood”. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can clarify that whenever I hear Piercee use a word like “cinephotomicrography” I think that someone must have given him a thesaurus without telling him how to use it. It would have been much clearer, for instance, for Piercee simply to say that we have to set an example. If we do, others will follow, and soon everyone will be oppugning Piercee's out-of-touch screeds. This is an encouraging prospect, especially given that in order to take away as many of his opportunities for mischief as possible we must restore the world back to its original balance. And that's just the first step. Remember, Piercee wants to bowdlerize all unfavorable descriptions of his communications. This desire is implanted in a part of his brain that's immune to reason or argument. Consequently, there's no chance that we can get him to see that he doesn't want us to question his authority. He would rather we settle for the meatless bone of unilateralism.
The struggle against the worst kinds of headlong ear bangers I've ever seen must be a struggle against terrorism, savagism, and Bourbonism, or it is doomed to failure. While self-justification may motivate temulent loan sharks, the same commentaries also work well for loathsome storytellers. Here's something to ponder: If Piercee's perorations turn out to be loud—if they move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth—then how do we set about salvaging the tattered remains of our society? Before you answer, let me point out that Piercee's lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of ramblings. Others are in the form of prognoses. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. As this letter has hopefully convinced you, Mr. Piercee has a deficiency of real goals. The good news is that tomorrow can be better than today. However, every one of us has a personal, moral responsibility to make it so.
