NA All-Time Duelists/Groupfighters*UPDATE*

[~NickCole~]

Do the Feinting list please.

Ritz
Emo
Steven
Pedro
Bill

Emo has the best feints easily

[Theodin]

If I'm not the #1 spammer idk what to say

I know I like to call myself best downspammer NA but you and I can't compare to Spinoza. He was truly the best downspammer I've ever seen. 63e members can attest to this. Dude won an entire tournament in the 63e with just downspam. Absolute cancer but it was all he did.

nah chev takes the cake as #1, that's what I've always said

[Stroke0fd34th]

Feints

Emo
Maple
Kovy
RitZ
Blade
Tammo
Ritz407

[|Viper|]

Old Gens are always superior it seems.. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Krastinov]

God these lists lol

Literally just copy pasting the same Old Gens and then slightly re-arranging their names and maybe sneaking in a new gen every so often

These people BLOW, easier era, easier melee, disgusting.

[Stroke0fd34th]

Old Gens are always superior it seems.. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

If you're talking about all-time, I think you need a year and a half of being at/near the top minimum to qualify. If it's category specific, I still think it should be a year minimum of being among the best at it for at least a year.


That's why newgens have a hard time qualifying for lists, either haven't been around long enough, period, or haven't been good long enough.

[Oatmeal]

God these lists lol

Literally just copy pasting the same Old Gens and then slightly re-arranging their names and maybe sneaking in a new gen every so often

These people BLOW, easier era, easier melee, disgusting.

i sadly agree with you for once

[|Viper|]

Old Gens are always superior it seems.. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

If you're talking about all-time, I think you need a year and a half of being at/near the top minimum to qualify. If it's category specific, I still think it should be a year minimum of being among the best at it for at least a year.


That's why newgens have a hard time qualifying for lists, either haven't been around long enough, period, or haven't been good long enough.

Then what's the point of making lists with the same names? As Krastinov said taking the same people and re arranging them. New content is needed.

[Theodin]

Old Gens are always superior it seems.. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

If you're talking about all-time, I think you need a year and a half of being at/near the top minimum to qualify. If it's category specific, I still think it should be a year minimum of being among the best at it for at least a year.


That's why newgens have a hard time qualifying for lists, either haven't been around long enough, period, or haven't been good long enough.

Then what's the point of making lists with the same names? As Krastinov said taking the same people and re arranging them. New content is needed.

Lists never have any point, so questioning the point of lists while at the same time wanting to be on them is a sketchy path

Feints

Emo
Maple
Kovy
RitZ
Blade
Tammo
Ritz407

Emo yea, Maple yea, Kovy eh? He doesn't really fient, he holds well instead
RitZ and -407 yes!
Blade never fiented, he dolphined.
Tammo yes

[|Viper|]

Old Gens are always superior it seems.. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

If you're talking about all-time, I think you need a year and a half of being at/near the top minimum to qualify. If it's category specific, I still think it should be a year minimum of being among the best at it for at least a year.


That's why newgens have a hard time qualifying for lists, either haven't been around long enough, period, or haven't been good long enough.

Then what's the point of making lists with the same names? As Krastinov said taking the same people and re arranging them. New content is needed.

Lists never have any point, so questioning the point of lists while at the same time wanting to be on them is a sketchy path

It's not that I don't think we should have lists it's that we need some new content most of the lists are 98% Old Gens so it's basically the same thing with the same names, why not change it up a bit?

[Risk_]

Old Gens are always superior it seems.. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

If you're talking about all-time, I think you need a year and a half of being at/near the top minimum to qualify. If it's category specific, I still think it should be a year minimum of being among the best at it for at least a year.


That's why newgens have a hard time qualifying for lists, either haven't been around long enough, period, or haven't been good long enough.

Then what's the point of making lists with the same names? As Krastinov said taking the same people and re arranging them. New content is needed.

Lists never have any point, so questioning the point of lists while at the same time wanting to be on them is a sketchy path

well said.

[Theodin]

Old Gens are always superior it seems.. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

If you're talking about all-time, I think you need a year and a half of being at/near the top minimum to qualify. If it's category specific, I still think it should be a year minimum of being among the best at it for at least a year.


That's why newgens have a hard time qualifying for lists, either haven't been around long enough, period, or haven't been good long enough.

Then what's the point of making lists with the same names? As Krastinov said taking the same people and re arranging them. New content is needed.

Lists never have any point, so questioning the point of lists while at the same time wanting to be on them is a sketchy path

It's not that I don't think we should have lists it's that we need some new content most of the lists are 98% Old Gens so it's basically the same thing with the same names, why not change it up a bit and add some New Gens? If you think about it the New Gens have been playing as long as the Old Gens at this point.

Er, it's not really the same thing with the same names. I don't think you understand how next level the "same name" people were. To compare any new gens with someone like Tammo, Jackie, RitZ etc always stacks in the old gens favour.

Putting more new gens in would be tokenism.

[Stroke0fd34th]

Old Gens are always superior it seems.. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

If you're talking about all-time, I think you need a year and a half of being at/near the top minimum to qualify. If it's category specific, I still think it should be a year minimum of being among the best at it for at least a year.


That's why newgens have a hard time qualifying for lists, either haven't been around long enough, period, or haven't been good long enough.

Then what's the point of making lists with the same names? As Krastinov said taking the same people and re arranging them. New content is needed.

You need to do more than feint spam for a month in order to be considered an all-time best feinter lol, longevity is a big part of qualifying for an all-time list, among other factors.

The reason people make lists is that they disagree with other peoples lists or want their opinion on record. I don't acknowledge any of them as a definitive community list.

I disagree with most lists tbh (shocking), just never enough to post my own.

[Risk_]

Old Gens are always superior it seems.. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

If you're talking about all-time, I think you need a year and a half of being at/near the top minimum to qualify. If it's category specific, I still think it should be a year minimum of being among the best at it for at least a year.


That's why newgens have a hard time qualifying for lists, either haven't been around long enough, period, or haven't been good long enough.

Then what's the point of making lists with the same names? As Krastinov said taking the same people and re arranging them. New content is needed.

Lists never have any point, so questioning the point of lists while at the same time wanting to be on them is a sketchy path

It's not that I don't think we should have lists it's that we need some new content most of the lists are 98% Old Gens so it's basically the same thing with the same names, why not change it up a bit?

yeah because old gens were good for years my guy. show some R E S P E C T

[|Viper|]

Eh. Everyone has their own opinions.