Spoiler
Let's try to stay civil please.
You've already done more than Windflower with that simple post. You have my vote for the next election
Do you have a raging hard on for me CluelessWill? I see you sneak dissing me quite frequently and I find it odd. You have a hard time talking to or liking a person who doesn't take anyone's shit? Do you need to vent your feelings to me in Teamspeak CluelessWill?
First off you disappeared for like half your CR tenure so that's what I was making fun of you for. Second, you consistently talked shit about the LG both in and out of game and that is extremely annoying. Attempting to justify why people wouldn't join the shitty 30th and then crying when we beat you every linebattle was both laughable and highlighted how prone your character was to deflecting for how bad your regiment was for how we got good so fast. Maybe you should up your charisma trait so people would actually want to join a regiment you make instead of crying wolf on why others are so good. Finally I also would never want to waste the precious oxygen on this planet by trying to talk to you so no need.
I was gone for 2 weeks lol. And of course I always talked shit the LG were the most toxic regiment in the game. I never really cared about people not wanting to join the 30th lol I was satisfied with the members Panda and I had because it made it even more satisfying when we beat and tied regiments with much better players. You guys "getting better fast" hmmmmmmmmmm, for sure not a bandwagon or steroid in the form of the 45e.. When the LG was in S1 in NAPL we were on an even level. The LG surpassed us ye but we still competed and were top 3-5 pretty much always in that shithole of a meta 2017 was. The truth is that the LG has been scared its entire career, and you wouldn't talk to me in ts because you're scared too b*tch. 
BUT MUH DISCIPLINE, THE 30TH IS SO DISCIPLINED, YEAH BOYS LETS RUN AWAY BOYS, OH YEAH BOYS LETS SHOW EM OUR DISCIPLINE AGAINST THEIR TOXICITY
That's honestly one of the most pathetic arguments I've heard and that's coming from me. Anyways, go on and tell me that you weren't jealous that actually good players joined the LG and 3e while no namers joined your regiment and consequently made sure it never accomplished anything if melee was involved. BANDWAGONARGUMENT.EXE
Also, if you couldn't be top 3 or 5 in a time period where there.. only like 6 regiments (maybe?) around then I'd feel bad for you, but go ahead and gloat about being number 3 with no chance of ever becoming number 2, yet alone number 1. That's like bragging about being the 3rd strongest man in a room with two well built blokes on one side and 3 inbred paraplegics with you being 5 foot tall and trying to use your strict bedtime as some sort of leverage in a fight. I would call you a bitch but that would be an insult to the word.
I mean thats not what i said but okay lol. That's weird coming from a loyal 63e pawn. I mean this is why leaders have been subpar, avoiding melee is heavily frowned upon even when the odds are stacked against you. I dont really know what argument you mean like tf are you on about fabricating and spouting shit? And yeah I cared that there were only 2 regiments with the majority of the competitive community in it but I never cared to have those members especially in that capacity as I am a moral god and have always been against the way of the bandwagon. Plus our melee was pretty decent for a time and I'm not ashamed of it at all. Maybe we fell off a little bit at the ending times of our existence but the community was a bit more balanced then and we still managed because of how bad leaders were still. The only thing I'll gloat about is winning NAPL twice. 
So I'd say we've been 1st 2nd 3rd 4th best at some point yanno? I can say I wasn't a hoe and hopped straight to your regiments rival aka the best regiment in the game, seems fishyy Willy.
Ahh yes, calling me a 63e pawn despite the fact that I left the 63e so I could learn from better players rather then be stuck with the same skill ceiling of the 63e. My time in the 12th, 3e and 2te taught me a lot and I'm forever grateful to have been able to meet such great people who were infinitely better than me in melee and had different perspectives of LB's. It helped me learn a lot about melee and actually help others as well from that knowledge. As a matter of fact I met some great friends from those regiments and can say that Who-, Mack, Salty, Tico, etc. were some amazing people. Good observation Flowerboy. I suppose that if I had kept myself in the lower tier regiments then I'd be just as bad as you because I'd never know what winning was like.
Additionally, winning NAPL's is no big feat considering the state of competition and general exhaustion of the scene when you won. It would explain why you never won any of the starting NWL's when the competition was actually something. Beating shit regiments and then getting a few narrow, usually controversial wins, on top regiments to secure a victory sure is something to brag about. If these victories were landslide melee wins then sure I'd be impressed that you developed your rankers into good players, but usually it came down to hill camping, being forced to move, then going back to the same hill after we try to engage. That's not Erwin Rommel level at all.
