YES, because if you go against a type of cavalry that is by itself stronger than you UNLESS you do BASIC things against it you have to adapt or lose. Every class has its goods and its bads, Hussar suffers from low hp - high maneuver, so anything that has an ability to abuse that HP threshold is intself stronger, but you are faster, you take the course of action and have much better stats than most of the other classes cav-duel wise, why not use it? Because you were unprepared.
All the past editions we picked Curassiers, and Hussars are stronger than them, UNLESS... guess it? We adapted to another playstyle and it """"SURPRISNGLY"""" worked, despite having an unadvantage.
Unless of course, you don't want to win. But hey, it's okay, let the rest have a disadvantage while you sit in your confy golden throne doing fuckall because you simply are stronger than the other classes and you are not smart enough.
Also, targe...
Really...
How are they incompatible at all? We had our tactics to minimize damage cause by Hussars and half of our team were a bit less experienced than the average competitive NW player, but we weren't the ones that had to adapt to your playstyle and come with some fancy tricks, you are the ones in a disadvantage UNLESS you do something, in which you would be on a fair ground, like with the other nations BUT they adapted, unlike you. Doesn't take a genius, really.
