1v1ed 92nd once
zeth, redwall, and multiple other people were there that bandwagon.
and the shitty 5th only lost 6-4
you werent that good.
You forget the NANWL match in 2014/2015 where you were too afraid to get in close so we ended up sitting there for several minutes doing nothing. We won 6-4 without some of our best players, and that was still early in the time of 92nd's best success, and it was the time of the 5th's highest. Don't kid yourself, you still lost, it's sad you're still butthurt in 2016, and it's really sad you still have that shitty 12 year old attitude about everything.
@Apoc and Alex and whoever
The argument I'm putting out there is that at the height of the 92nd in 2014/2015, which was absolutely when we were doing our best, we were beating out every single competitive NA regiment that dared to actually play against us. Many instances, it even came down to us not caring about end results (like subbing out our best players against the 63e after we got 6-0), which in my
humble opinion adds to the 92nd's legacy; the 92nd were winners and they didn't need to boast to prove that.
Literally the only reason the 92nd isn't remembered is because instead of sticking around in a game we were all bored of for another several weeks just to get that title of "best NA haha memes xD", we disbanded when we managed to beat every NA regiment who would be a real challenge against us, and those who didn't want to challenge us/backed out *cough* 71st *cough* have no argument to make. When we reformed several months ago, we did it for one reason: people were trying to take the 92nd name who flat out did not deserve it, EU or NA, and various members wanted it to reform for whichever reasons. We helped 92nd become a legacy in North America, on top of its prestigious history in Europe, and for that reason I wholeheartedly believe that 92nd deserves credit on this thread. I'm sorry you guys want to ignore the 92nd to bolster your own successes in this game, but I will believe and argue until the day I die that the 92nd at its greatest height would have beaten out 99% of all NA regiments in the history of NW, with the two true exclusions that I can make being the 12th and 9y, if we matched up the best players of each against each other (given, 92nd had way more spare players over both regiments, each of them with pretty considerable skill level, and our biggest advantage was our incredible teamwork/groupfighting/teamfighting abilities, not individual skill, though our CO's and Grens were damned skilled). 3eVolt would be close, and having joined them briefly I hold a lot of respect towards them, but I truthfully don't see them beating the height of the 92nd at their own height. Having played briefly in the Nr24 before it unfortunately disbanded (fortunately for some EU players, for the same reason 92nd's first disbandment would have been fortunate for some NA), I would argue that the 92nd was the Nr24 of NA, though that would probably rustle some feathers.
P.S. At the time of 92nd's success in NA, at least the most of it (the stuff that I experienced), the EU portion had already been disbanded. However, there was never any reform, we were the direct continuation from the original group. Just wanted to clear that up.
