Author Topic: NA_Groupfighting | www.nwleaderboards.com  (Read 563340 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Slif

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 459
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Slif
  • Side: Union
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #210 on: February 24, 2016, 11:10:36 pm »
Name of the person causing trouble: 71st_LCpl_SliF
Nature of their offense: tking at spawn
Time and date of their offense: ~5:00pm 2/24/16
If needed, what your relationship was to the offense in question.: I got tked
Any proof if you have it, For instance screenshots. (use spoilers!):
Spoiler

extra points for him getting butthurt about being called out on making excuses
[close]
Are you out to make people's lives as miserable as possible?
Currently: 87th

Formerly: 71st, 63e, MoskovGren

Puppytron

  • Guest
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #211 on: February 24, 2016, 11:14:16 pm »
Name of the person causing trouble: 71st_LCpl_SliF
Nature of their offense: tking at spawn
Time and date of their offense: ~5:00pm 2/24/16
If needed, what your relationship was to the offense in question.: I got tked
Any proof if you have it, For instance screenshots. (use spoilers!):
Spoiler

extra points for him getting butthurt about being called out on making excuses
[close]
Are you out to make people's lives as miserable as possible?
its a sad day when being banned from na gfing is enough to make you miserable

Offline Shine

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 2631
  • ˙͜>˙
    • View Profile
  • Nick: [1erPLG]Lans_5hine
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #212 on: February 24, 2016, 11:23:58 pm »
Name of the person causing trouble: 63e_Tir_The-Fuhrer-of-funk
Nature of their offense: Intentional teamkilling
Time and date of their offense: 9:28 pm PST 2/23
If needed, what your relationship was to the offense in question.: Victim
Any proof if you have it, For instance screenshots. (use spoilers!):

I was on the non-steam version of steam playing under the name of minimormon so I do not have screenshots this time. You can see it in the logs. He teamkilled me at the beginning of multiple rounds and I even warned that it was a bannable offence, before he team killed me again and left the server.  Other users displayed their discontent through chat as can be seen in the logs.

Banned, thanks for the report.

Name of the person causing trouble: 71st_LCpl_SliF
Nature of their offense: tking at spawn
Time and date of their offense: ~5:00pm 2/24/16
If needed, what your relationship was to the offense in question.: I got tked
Any proof if you have it, For instance screenshots. (use spoilers!):
Spoiler

extra points for him getting butthurt about being called out on making excuses
[close]

Was handled in the server, no ban for now. Thanks for the report.

Offline Slif

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 459
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Slif
  • Side: Union
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #213 on: February 24, 2016, 11:30:07 pm »
Name of the person causing trouble: puppytron
Nature of their offense: 6. No racism, sexism, homophobia or other insulting (banter with your FRIENDS is naturally allowed).
Time and date of their offense: ~5:00pm EST 2/24/16
If needed, what your relationship was to the offense in question.: Recieving end
Any proof if you have it, For instance screenshots. (use spoilers!):

You can see it in his own screenshot, I have asked Label for chat logs (and will add them if/when I can get them, when he is able to get around to it :) ) for when he initially got on and started banter ~10 seconds into being in the server. (I was playing bad, and he decided to try to create a fight out of it).
Spoiler
[close]
Extra: forum banter
Spoiler
[close]

Did I tk? Yes. Was that the appropriate response? No. Was puppy trying to start a fight via banter? Yes. If I get punished for that, he should at least be punished for getting on the server just to create problems.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2016, 11:31:40 pm by Slif »
Currently: 87th

Formerly: 71st, 63e, MoskovGren

Offline Shine

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 2631
  • ˙͜>˙
    • View Profile
  • Nick: [1erPLG]Lans_5hine
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #214 on: February 24, 2016, 11:36:57 pm »
Name of the person causing trouble: puppytron
Nature of their offense: 6. No racism, sexism, homophobia or other insulting (banter with your FRIENDS is naturally allowed).
Time and date of their offense: ~5:00pm EST 2/24/16
If needed, what your relationship was to the offense in question.: Recieving end
Any proof if you have it, For instance screenshots. (use spoilers!):

You can see it in his own screenshot, I have asked Label for chat logs (and will add them if/when I can get them, when he is able to get around to it :) ) for when he initially got on and started banter ~10 seconds into being in the server. (I was playing bad, and he decided to try to create a fight out of it).
Spoiler
[close]
Extra: forum banter
Spoiler
[close]

Did I tk? Yes. Was that the appropriate response? No. Was puppy trying to start a fight via banter? Yes. If I get punished for that, he should at least be punished for getting on the server just to create problems.

No, not going to ban someone because you're a little butthurt you got temp-banned. Move on.

Puppytron

  • Guest
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #215 on: February 24, 2016, 11:40:23 pm »
Name of the person causing trouble: puppytron
Nature of their offense: 6. No racism, sexism, homophobia or other insulting (banter with your FRIENDS is naturally allowed).
Time and date of their offense: ~5:00pm EST 2/24/16
If needed, what your relationship was to the offense in question.: Recieving end
Any proof if you have it, For instance screenshots. (use spoilers!):

You can see it in his own screenshot, I have asked Label for chat logs (and will add them if/when I can get them, when he is able to get around to it :) ) for when he initially got on and started banter ~10 seconds into being in the server. (I was playing bad, and he decided to try to create a fight out of it).
Spoiler
[close]
Extra: forum banter
Spoiler
[close]

Did I tk? Yes. Was that the appropriate response? No. Was puppy trying to start a fight via banter? Yes. If I get punished for that, he should at least be punished for getting on the server just to create problems.
I'm actually flattered you took what I said to heart. Right now I'm imagining Label suppressing a chuckle when he sees the chat logs.

Offline Shine

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 2631
  • ˙͜>˙
    • View Profile
  • Nick: [1erPLG]Lans_5hine
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #216 on: February 24, 2016, 11:40:52 pm »
Please no more bickering.

Offline Bear

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4686
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #217 on: February 24, 2016, 11:41:01 pm »
Name of the person causing trouble: puppytron
Nature of their offense: 6. No racism, sexism, homophobia or other insulting (banter with your FRIENDS is naturally allowed).
Time and date of their offense: ~5:00pm EST 2/24/16
If needed, what your relationship was to the offense in question.: Recieving end
Any proof if you have it, For instance screenshots. (use spoilers!):

You can see it in his own screenshot, I have asked Label for chat logs (and will add them if/when I can get them, when he is able to get around to it :) ) for when he initially got on and started banter ~10 seconds into being in the server. (I was playing bad, and he decided to try to create a fight out of it).
Spoiler
[close]
Extra: forum banter
Spoiler
[close]

Did I tk? Yes. Was that the appropriate response? No. Was puppy trying to start a fight via banter? Yes. If I get punished for that, he should at least be punished for getting on the server just to create problems.
I'm actually flattered you took what I said to heart. Right now I'm imagining Label suppressing a chuckle when he sees the chat logs.
Label has pretty cute chuckles ngl but yeah what 5hine said yay admining

Puppytron

  • Guest
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #218 on: February 24, 2016, 11:44:24 pm »
I actually encourage any admin with the ability to do so to look at the chat logs anyways, I thought it was pretty funny tbh.

Offline Slif

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 459
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Slif
  • Side: Union
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #219 on: February 24, 2016, 11:46:56 pm »
I actually encourage any admin with the ability to do so to look at the chat logs anyways, I thought it was pretty funny tbh.
Really? No, really? Congrats, you got me banned. Please stop trying to continue a fight. :)
Currently: 87th

Formerly: 71st, 63e, MoskovGren

Offline Windflower

  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 15021
  • ex PSG, 30th
    • View Profile
    • my jam
  • Side: Union
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #220 on: February 24, 2016, 11:52:44 pm »
Puppytron is the banter god, papa bless.

NAPL season 1 saw the greatest regiment winning
ribbit 🐸 cute? 😳 im not cute 😓 i mean my parents 👨‍👩‍👧 call me cute ☺️ but honestly 👉👈 ive never ❌ heard it 👂 from someone else 🗣 before 🥰 thanks i guess? 😳

Offline Andee

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 4354
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #221 on: February 25, 2016, 12:04:34 am »
Name of the person causing trouble: puppytron
Nature of their offense: 6. No racism, sexism, homophobia or other insulting (banter with your FRIENDS is naturally allowed).
Time and date of their offense: ~5:00pm EST 2/24/16
If needed, what your relationship was to the offense in question.: Recieving end
Any proof if you have it, For instance screenshots. (use spoilers!):

You can see it in his own screenshot, I have asked Label for chat logs (and will add them if/when I can get them, when he is able to get around to it :) ) for when he initially got on and started banter ~10 seconds into being in the server. (I was playing bad, and he decided to try to create a fight out of it).
Spoiler
[close]
Extra: forum banter
Spoiler
[close]

Did I tk? Yes. Was that the appropriate response? No. Was puppy trying to start a fight via banter? Yes. If I get punished for that, he should at least be punished for getting on the server just to create problems.

Did he hurt your feelings? :/
xD

Puppytron

  • Guest
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #222 on: February 25, 2016, 12:04:43 am »
Spoiler
Hi I'm new here and have degenerative cognitive function, so as each season of NANWL passes I become increasingly mentally disabled. How do I apply for a spot on the list? My doctor tells me I meet the federal IQ requierements for an "inanimate object", hopefully that is enough to qualify me for a spot on this esteemed list.
Puppy is actually the best shitposter I know. Better than Ody by far

puppy is literally the patron god of shitposting. if there was an elite tier of shitposters, he would be there by himself.
[close]
i think im finally nw famous. mum git the cameruh

Offline Kovyjack

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 856
  • I'm gay, no homo though.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Nr.21
  • Side: Union
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #223 on: February 25, 2016, 12:42:30 am »
Too many snitches  :-\

Offline Tammo

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1720
  • I eat ass daily
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Bob Ross
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NA_Groupfighting. (NEW UPDATED THREAD)
« Reply #224 on: February 25, 2016, 01:12:43 am »
Puppytron is the banter god, papa bless.

+1