NW Community Representative Voting

[Gragnok]

I voted for Mikkel without him steaming me :O

[James Grant]

I was a bit sad(as in being a saddo,not unhappy) and saw that about 60% of one representatives voters had no posts.


But then what could be expected of such.

[Audiate]

 Personally, I had more of a problem with Hypern being elected. Last night, he came to me in TS, while my regiment was doing training. He asked if he could get some votes for the Community Representative elections. I didn't like that. So that's my two cents.

[Robin_Hood]

I voted for Mikkel without him steaming me :O

If you are to signify the type who vote for him, well, I hereby rest my case.

[Robin_Hood]

Personally, I had more of a problem with Hypern being elected. Last night, he came to me in TS, while my regiment was doing training. He asked if he could get some votes for the Community Representative elections. I didn't like that. So that's my two cents.

Hypern is like that, and you should have reported him as soon as he did it. I would have! :L

[PrideofNi]

I voted for Mikkel without him steaming me :O

Likewise.

[Robin_Hood]

I voted for Mikkel without him steaming me :O

Likewise.

Was it a swing vote? Or did you genuinely think someone such as Mikkel could better the community?

I mean, what did he even offer? Rocket launchers for everyone on EU1?

[Mekkil the Graet]

I voted for Mikkel without him steaming me :O

If you are to signify the type who vote for him, well, I hereby rest my case.

...I do not hold the pleasure of having Vincenzo on my friendslist, and I certainly did not ask Olaf nor Admiral to vote for me. Just to mention a few examples you may know of yourself. An apology would be appreciated.

[Menelaos]

It was a matter of who spammed to get more accounts, or the people you told to vote for you. I guess it does represent people, but not people who give a shit about forum drama. Honestly we don't even understand what these reps are supposed to get.

[Robin_Hood]

I voted for Mikkel without him steaming me :O

If you are to signify the type who vote for him, well, I hereby rest my case.

...I do not hold the pleasure of having Vincenzo on my friendslist, and I certainly did not ask Olaf nor Admiral to vote for me. Just to mention a few examples you may know of yourself. An apology would be appreciated.

Why?

The people who voted for you fit the criteria of those who would vote for you, and if you manage to shock me by pulling up someone with integrity and without as many faces as big Ben then I would stand in awe but as it stands, I simply cannot believe they would vote for you under the premise of you fulfilling the role. Sorry, Mikkel, I just can't imagine what else you would do other than do a pledge of everyone gets unlimited build points in order to play warband: Minecraft edition.

[PrideofNi]

I voted for Mikkel without him steaming me :O

Likewise.

Was it a swing vote? Or did you genuinely think someone such as Mikkel could better the community?

I mean, what did he even offer? Rocket launchers for everyone on EU1?

I wanted to vote for someone who has been around since MM, many of who up there weren't. I just feel in order to understand the community we have, you need to have been in it for quite a while, not only to know a lot of groups but also the underlying problems that have been re-occuring. Mikkel is also very good at communicating and articulating his points of view, which I also thought would be important.

Huh? This doesn't give admin powers on the servers.

[Robin_Hood]

I voted for Mikkel without him steaming me :O

Likewise.

Was it a swing vote? Or did you genuinely think someone such as Mikkel could better the community?

I mean, what did he even offer? Rocket launchers for everyone on EU1?

I wanted to vote for someone who has been around since MM, many of who up there weren't. I just feel in order to understand the community we have, you need to have been in it for quite a while, not only to know a lot of groups but also the underlying problems that have been re-occuring. Mikkel is also very good at communicating and articulating his points of view, which I also thought would be important.

Huh? This doesn't give admin powers on the servers.

Gives him the ability to lobby for such game wrecking events. I have known Mikkel for years and I stand by my point that it was a bad, bad, bad vote :L.

[PrideofNi]

I voted for Mikkel without him steaming me :O

Likewise.

Was it a swing vote? Or did you genuinely think someone such as Mikkel could better the community?

I mean, what did he even offer? Rocket launchers for everyone on EU1?

I wanted to vote for someone who has been around since MM, many of who up there weren't. I just feel in order to understand the community we have, you need to have been in it for quite a while, not only to know a lot of groups but also the underlying problems that have been re-occuring. Mikkel is also very good at communicating and articulating his points of view, which I also thought would be important.

Huh? This doesn't give admin powers on the servers.

Gives him the ability to lobby for such game wrecking events. I have known Mikkel for years and I stand by my point that it was a bad, bad, bad vote :L.

I've known him for probably a year now as well, and I don't think it was and since it was my vote, that is all that matters. I've no idea what you keep going on about, game wrecking, giving rocket launchers...:S What are you going on about, his task is to improve the community, not admin servers.

[Gragnok]

The people who voted for you fit the criteria of those who would vote for you,

What are these criteria exactly?

[Robin_Hood]

I voted for Mikkel without him steaming me :O

Likewise.

Was it a swing vote? Or did you genuinely think someone such as Mikkel could better the community?

I mean, what did he even offer? Rocket launchers for everyone on EU1?

I wanted to vote for someone who has been around since MM, many of who up there weren't. I just feel in order to understand the community we have, you need to have been in it for quite a while, not only to know a lot of groups but also the underlying problems that have been re-occuring. Mikkel is also very good at communicating and articulating his points of view, which I also thought would be important.

Huh? This doesn't give admin powers on the servers.

Gives him the ability to lobby for such game wrecking events. I have known Mikkel for years and I stand by my point that it was a bad, bad, bad vote :L.

I've known him for probably a year now as well, and I don't think it was and since it was my vote, that is all that matters. I've no idea what you keep going on about, game wrecking, giving rocket launchers...:S What are you going on about, his task is to improve the community, not admin servers.

Oh, sorry, I forgot that as a community rep he could not make petitions in order to have something called a 'Fun night' where Olafsson comes on to blow everything up. Yes, it was your vote but you may as well of voted for Betty to be the community representative since heshe can argue her point across as well.

My last reply on the Mikkel matter.