Author Topic: Resignation - Hekko  (Read 20953 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline James Stewart

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 649
  • Doesn't like Welsh Riflemen
    • View Profile
    • 91st Website
  • Nick: 91st_Col_James_Stewart
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #90 on: January 29, 2013, 01:58:13 am »
I would deem Mr Hood's relationship to Tavington highly speculative. But tell me, what is your relation to Blob?

You make a fair point, however an ineffective one. Mr Hood has made a conscious choice to follow Tavington as a member of his regiment, making his relationship anything but speculative. As to my relationship with Blobmania, I have made no conscious or active decision to align myself as one of his disciples. If it puts you at further ease, there has been no personal contact between me or Blobmania for several weeks.

So Mr. Hood, according to your sources, is a member of the 91st?

That would certainly seem to be the implication, yes. As Mr Tavington himself has affirmed.
And has that got something to do with the argument?

Offline BRIANISBACK

  • Volunteer
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #91 on: January 29, 2013, 02:00:09 am »
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8RCQDDsMpU[/youtube]

Offline Robin_Hood

  • Sergeant Major
  • *
  • Posts: 176
  • To be British; is to be haughtily honest.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Sid the slick sh*t
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #92 on: January 29, 2013, 02:00:27 am »
I would deem Mr Hood's relationship to Tavington highly speculative. But tell me, what is your relation to Blob?

You make a fair point, however an ineffective one. Mr Hood has made a conscious choice to follow Tavington as a member of his regiment, making his relationship anything but speculative. As to my relationship with Blobmania, I have made no conscious or active decision to align myself as one of his disciples. If it puts you at further ease, there has been no personal contact between me or Blobmania for several weeks.

So Mr. Hood, according to your sources, is a member of the 91st?

That would certainly seem to be the implication, yes. As Mr Tavington himself has affirmed.
And has that got something to do with the argument?

He seems to think that we are on TS with a plot to pour as much petrol on this thread as possible, he clearly is mistaken.

Instigating arguments is such a broad term, for all could be potentially and usually innocently participating in this joke of a rule. Post an opinion, someone disagrees and therefore you have instigated an argument. Now, sonny, welcome to the FSE graveyard where we ban you all with our sketchy rules as the tool. And why you say? Because we can, son.

Offline PJ

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 962
  • Beneath the gold, the bitter steel
    • View Profile
  • Nick: PJ
  • Side: Union
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #93 on: January 29, 2013, 02:01:29 am »
Hekko for President!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A year of underdogs

Offline Menelaos

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 4000
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #94 on: January 29, 2013, 02:02:16 am »
This thread is nohing but spam from new formites that will leave soon so I thought I'd post my thought.

Through your threads promoting melee via firing out of line I learned a few things from you and I applaud you for doing the best in your vision for the community. I do not endorse the shitstorm you started or the methods. Good luck in the future with whatever you do!

Offline Creed

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 110
    • View Profile
  • Nick: K-KA_Nr57_Fus_Creed
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #95 on: January 29, 2013, 02:02:50 am »
Hekko for President!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

if you have nothing productive to say in this thread then dont say anything at all

Offline Modig

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 627
  • Aspirerande arbetsaristoj
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #96 on: January 29, 2013, 02:03:51 am »
Hekko for President!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

if you have nothing productive to say in this thread then dont say anything at all

What'a not productive about it?

Offline Hawkes

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 373
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #97 on: January 29, 2013, 02:04:13 am »
This thread is nohing but spam from new formites that will leave soon so I thought I'd post my thought.

Through your threads promoting melee via firing out of line I learned a few things from you and I applaud you for doing the best in your vision for the community. I do not endorse the shitstorm you started or the methods. Good luck in the future with whatever you do!

We need more fair minded people like this person.

Offline PJ

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 962
  • Beneath the gold, the bitter steel
    • View Profile
  • Nick: PJ
  • Side: Union
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #98 on: January 29, 2013, 02:04:26 am »
Hekko for President!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

if you have nothing productive to say in this thread then dont say anything at all
Way to be a buzz-kill bro :(. Just supporting Hekko and his amazing endeavors!
A year of underdogs

Offline Harbinger

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #99 on: January 29, 2013, 02:04:56 am »
I loved reading that Dropbox file

"The bans on these people were long overdue and as they stirred shit up for no good reason about the policy over the 51st name"

Love that part, people are not allowed to criticize (stir up shit) an admins terrible judgement.
"Terrible judgement". As if the name locking was a big deal, until regiments who felt left out (for no reason) and started to whine about "hurr durr 51st got honor we r just as important". The devs never said you weren't as important. The other regiments were never left out. If a major clan that had the same carreer of contributing to the community for a long time left the game, the devs would most likely have given them the same honours.

Offline HorseMan

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 63
    • View Profile
  • Nick: FSEForums_Sergeant_Horseman
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #100 on: January 29, 2013, 02:06:06 am »
I loved reading that Dropbox file

"The bans on these people were long overdue and as they stirred shit up for no good reason about the policy over the 51st name"

Love that part, people are not allowed to criticize (stir up shit) an admins terrible judgement.
"Terrible judgement". As if the name locking was a big deal, until regiments who felt left out (for no reason) and started to whine about "hurr durr 51st got honor we r just as important". The devs never said you weren't as important. The other regiments were never left out. If a major clan that had the same carreer of contributing to the community for a long time left the game, the devs would most likely have given them the same honours.

Yeh it was such a good idea that they reverted it right, Get a life, forget about your "Glorious" regiments past and move along.

Offline Afroman

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 17th_CSgt_Afroman
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #101 on: January 29, 2013, 02:06:25 am »
I would deem Mr Hood's relationship to Tavington highly speculative. But tell me, what is your relation to Blob?

You make a fair point, however an ineffective one. Mr Hood has made a conscious choice to follow Tavington as a member of his regiment, making his relationship anything but speculative. As to my relationship with Blobmania, I have made no conscious or active decision to align myself as one of his disciples. If it puts you at further ease, there has been no personal contact between me or Blobmania for several weeks.

So Mr. Hood, according to your sources, is a member of the 91st?

That would certainly seem to be the implication, yes. As Mr Tavington himself has affirmed.
And has that got something to do with the argument?

He seems to think that we are on TS with a plot to pour as much petrol on this thread as possible, he clearly is mistaken.

Well, whether or not you think I believe you to have hatched some conspiracy to 'pour petrol on this thread', you certainly seem to be succeeding in just that.

Offline Robin_Hood

  • Sergeant Major
  • *
  • Posts: 176
  • To be British; is to be haughtily honest.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Sid the slick sh*t
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #102 on: January 29, 2013, 02:06:54 am »
I loved reading that Dropbox file

"The bans on these people were long overdue and as they stirred shit up for no good reason about the policy over the 51st name"

Love that part, people are not allowed to criticize (stir up shit) an admins terrible judgement.
"Terrible judgement". As if the name locking was a big deal, until regiments who felt left out (for no reason) and started to whine about "hurr durr 51st got honor we r just as important". The devs never said you weren't as important. The other regiments were never left out. If a major clan that had the same carreer of contributing to the community for a long time left the game, the devs would most likely have given them the same honours.

Name locking wasn't a big deal, it was due to you having an in-game regiment as far as I know. I mean why would people kick up fuss over a number? A number with a unit is far more reasonable, well, at least that is why I complained.

Instigating arguments is such a broad term, for all could be potentially and usually innocently participating in this joke of a rule. Post an opinion, someone disagrees and therefore you have instigated an argument. Now, sonny, welcome to the FSE graveyard where we ban you all with our sketchy rules as the tool. And why you say? Because we can, son.

Offline Nipplestockings

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 8609
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #103 on: January 29, 2013, 02:07:11 am »
Hekko for President!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

if you have nothing productive to say in this thread then dont say anything at all
You have nothing to productive to say either. Actually I daresay nobody in this thread, including myself has anything productive to say. We're simply bickering with each other in the wake of Hekko's unfortunate resignation.

Offline Vorlen

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 339
  • [Nr.24]
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Resignation - Hekko
« Reply #104 on: January 29, 2013, 02:07:49 am »
I loved reading that Dropbox file

"The bans on these people were long overdue and as they stirred shit up for no good reason about the policy over the 51st name"

Love that part, people are not allowed to criticize (stir up shit) an admins terrible judgement.
"Terrible judgement". As if the name locking was a big deal, until regiments who felt left out (for no reason) and started to whine about "hurr durr 51st got honor we r just as important". The devs never said you weren't as important. The other regiments were never left out. If a major clan that had the same carreer of contributing to the community for a long time left the game, the devs would most likely have given them the same honours.

You act like anyone who knew them really cares about the 51st(gross overstatment, but no, most EU players didn't). It was never about your tag, your name. If it was any regiment that was "banned" and off limits it would have been the same. The fact that the reasons behind it were convuluted behind the Inner Circle and web of alliances was an additional, seperate point.