Author Topic: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot  (Read 60018 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Joe Crotch

  • Volunteer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 45th_LCpl_Joe_Crotch
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #465 on: August 04, 2014, 09:00:10 pm »
LOLOLOLOL say what? You didnt camp a lot? ROFL
And the last 3 to 4 rounds we charged in after 1 volley...
Also we fought 2 Lbs before, the first one we won 6-4 the second we won 9-1.

Keos you headglitched 50% of the time, fired out of line twice, need I  say more?

Offline The_Ace

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 329
  • Србин 101%
    • View Profile
    • 82nd.eu
  • Nick: Pavlovskiy_Yefr_AceSRB
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #466 on: August 04, 2014, 09:01:49 pm »
CROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTCH                                    hello

Offline Icarus

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1144
  • Groupfighting Admin, Tyrant of the old 1stKGL
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Ex 91st_LCpl_Matthew_Young
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #467 on: August 04, 2014, 09:08:11 pm »
Im not all fussed when it comes to fic that kills 1-2, but when is more than that and fic occurs in melee then is out of hand. It was my fault too for not stating and resolving that issue as it occurred. If it was real NWL rules like how you wanted then rounds will be given to us. Your "Didn't camp a lot" was a joke too, around 7-8 minutes in total consists of standing still. When it comes to NWL rules like how you wanted is both sides has to move after 2 minutes, not 5 minutes, you can look it up yourself.

As you mentioned, fic'ing is not possible to maintain as people are not "Robots" then you should keep in mind that this no FiC rule will not be in place to start with, FiC should not occur when the order was given to charge.

I'll admit the leading was not as great from us, fair rounds was scored, after all this isn't a official serious event, i'll leave it be here.

Offline Nico

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Jones
  • Side: Union
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #468 on: August 04, 2014, 09:09:50 pm »
Alright. But seriously we were just playing defensive the first 1-2 rounds.

Offline Joe Crotch

  • Volunteer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 45th_LCpl_Joe_Crotch
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #469 on: August 04, 2014, 09:11:19 pm »
Im not all fussed when it comes to fic that kills 1-2, but when is more than that and fic occurs in melee then is out of hand. It was my fault too for not stating and resolving that issue as it occurred. If it was real NWL rules like how you wanted then rounds will be given to us. Your "Didn't camp a lot" was a joke too, around 7-8 minutes in total consists of standing still. When it comes to NWL rules like how you wanted is both sides has to move after 2 minutes, not 5 minutes, you can look it up yourself.

As you mentioned, fic'ing is not possible to maintain as people are not "Robots" then you should keep in mind that this no FiC rule will not be in place to start with, FiC should not occur when the order was given to charge.

I'll admit the leading was not as great from us, fair rounds was scored, after all this isn't a official serious event, i'll leave it be here.

Well Icarus, I agree with the fact that it is not a serious event and we shall do our best to avoid such mistakes in the future if you guys will do the same.

Offline Keos

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • 1stKGL Member
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1stKGL_Cpl_Keos
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #470 on: August 04, 2014, 09:11:48 pm »
We headglitched one round after you guys didnt stop hillcamping and i was sick and tired of the constant charging up the hill.
So we headglitched at some point yes, for a round not for 5 rounds (which would be 50%).
Also noone said we were recording, if we had been we would have linked the video long ago.
I also specificaly agreed with your leader on steam before the LB started that there was NO HILLCAMPING.
You hillcamped EVERY ROUND until we started just not running in but hiding behind other hills to get you to come down from that one hill which is what you can describe as "headglitching".
You promptly responded by using said hill to headglitch after we moved up the hill after one volley cause we are no cheap headglitchers or hillcampers.
I also wont even argue anymore.
You broke every rule we agreed upon.
So you should be happy that we are willing to accept a 5-5.
If you think thats unfair we can gladly have a rematch on our server and then slay everyone who breaks the rules instantly.

Oh and yes we know matty was wrong, its 5 minutes in nwl.
Then again we NEVER agreed on nwl rules in the first place...
As i just saw matty is willing to let it go, the rematch "offer" still stands, id like to see you fight us on even ground.
In case anyone still has any doubts about the rulebreaking on their part just take a look at this thread and count how many times regs have already complaint about it...
« Last Edit: August 04, 2014, 09:19:01 pm by Keos »

Offline Nico

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Jones
  • Side: Union
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #471 on: August 04, 2014, 09:18:35 pm »
Did we slay your guys when they broke the rules? No! And we fought you guys 'on even ground' we 'hill camped' when you guys were standing still and move on when you were reforming, we also had to charge up hill 1 or 2 times. Just post the video. We'll see ok? and 'You broke every rule we agreed upon' is just WRONG.

We'll see if we can rematch you. We never fucked about rulebreaking in 1v1's, even we lose. We can't be bothered to make an arguement about it.
It's just retarded, but ok we'll see if we want to rematch

And I'm sorry for the FIC. We'll take care of it, we were just very unorganized with trainings and such. But we'll avoid that mistake next events.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2014, 09:23:35 pm by Nico »

Offline CrumpetAwesome

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 3565
  • Ex-Col, proudly lead the 4e
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #472 on: August 04, 2014, 09:19:48 pm »

Offline Nico

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Jones
  • Side: Union
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #473 on: August 04, 2014, 09:22:06 pm »
Crumpet, don't get banned!

Offline Keos

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • 1stKGL Member
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1stKGL_Cpl_Keos
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #474 on: August 04, 2014, 09:23:02 pm »
Ok this is my last reply for this:

You guys won rounds because of your rulebreaking, we might have broken the no fol rule ONCE which killed ONE of your guys.
You fired in charge and killed half our reg shooting us at point blank range because you knew you would loose in melee.
Oh also props to your recruit who managed to teamkill fire in charge =)

The rest will be talked out between matty and rapid i have nothing more to say.

Offline Nico

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Jones
  • Side: Union
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #475 on: August 04, 2014, 09:24:36 pm »
Just post the video, that video doesn't lie (if you won't edit it :p)
And we won in melee many times, with almost even numbers
« Last Edit: August 04, 2014, 09:31:34 pm by Nico »

Offline Joe Crotch

  • Volunteer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 45th_LCpl_Joe_Crotch
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #476 on: August 04, 2014, 09:25:59 pm »
Ok this is my last reply for this:

You guys won rounds because of your rulebreaking, we might have broken the no fol rule ONCE which killed ONE of your guys.
You fired in charge and killed half our reg shooting us at point blank range because you knew you would loose in melee.
Oh also props to your recruit who managed to teamkill fire in charge =)

The rest will be talked out between matty and rapid i have nothing more to say.
We shot you at point blank range because we were in a line and you were charging us. We are not forced to charge too, and as far as  I remember you don't really have great melee. :P

Offline (1stKGL)Apollo

  • Volunteer
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Sluts
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1stKGL_Kgm_Apollo
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #477 on: August 05, 2014, 03:06:40 am »
In Line on a hill for such as 7 min, AS KEOS ASKED/SAID NO HILLCAMPING

Offline Nico

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Jones
  • Side: Union
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #478 on: August 05, 2014, 12:42:50 pm »
oh come on, 7 min is gushy. And I'm very very very sorry that we killed too many of you in shooting -.-. It was the first 4 rounds that we basically camped and outnumbered you in shooting and clean up in melee. The 2 rounds after we had to run up the hill to charge too and we still won.
The last 4 rounds we were actually in close combat. If you're making an arguement, then first post your mistakes.

Yes we FIC and officer aimed once, those mistakes will not happen again IF we rematch.
If you do the same with FOL :p
« Last Edit: August 05, 2014, 01:01:07 pm by Nico »

Offline Kaasovic

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 8718
  • * and Obelix
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Anonymous
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot
« Reply #479 on: August 05, 2014, 01:00:24 pm »
U ckeeki scrublord
Developer of NordInvasion. Hi mum.