Author Topic: A concern on Rifle accuracy changing game play  (Read 18205 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline regwilliam

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 984
  • a regwilliam on steam if you wish to join the 63e
    • View Profile
  • Nick: William
  • Side: Union
Re: A concern on Rifle accuracy changing game play
« Reply #210 on: August 30, 2014, 10:31:39 pm »
Plus with better means of recruiting it should mean bigger regiment which can take more punishment. Just imagine 250 v 250 in long battle lines firing volleys into each other  8)

Offline ClearlyInvsible

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 6492
  • I'm still here. Dunno why.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: ClearlyInvsible
  • Side: Union
Re: A concern on Rifle accuracy changing game play
« Reply #211 on: August 30, 2014, 10:35:13 pm »
My God, I wonder if we'll ever be able to actually do a 250 vs 250 large line battle. We did a few 100 vs 100 ones in the Union Army LBs, and those were amazing.
"No man will make a great leader who wants to do it all himself or get all the credit for doing it."- Andrew Carnegie
“A man who has no conscience, no goodness, does not suffer.” - Khaled Hosseini
Faggots will burn in hell anyway, who cares.

Offline KL4R1N0G4MPR0S

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 2993
  • Εν τουτω νιγγα.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: A concern on Rifle accuracy changing game play
« Reply #212 on: August 31, 2014, 01:40:52 am »
My God, I wonder if we'll ever be able to actually do a 250 vs 250 large line battle. We did a few 100 vs 100 ones in the Union Army LBs, and those were amazing.
Stupendous, groundshaking, immense, lag. With a Capital L. :P hehe

On a serious note, isn't the 666e considered by some to be a troll regiment? Just curious.
<3