Author Topic: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot  (Read 14054 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stroke0fd34th

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 4124
  • Luck is for people who are too lazy to train
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Godfreid
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #300 on: February 19, 2019, 01:39:54 am »
Spoiler
Oh and here's that 1v1 vs 6teSLR we since everyone has been messaging me to see the video  :P.



After watching that match, and the last round, 6te went into melee down 4 against a regiment that was consistently wrecking them in even melees through out the 1v1. I personally wouldn't have bothered slaying Irish, but him being alive or dead at that point is irrelevant, he didn't stop 6te from getting steamrolled in melees  during previous rounds, I couldn't reasonably say it would've been any different that round with a 4 man disadvantage. No reason to call for, or expect a reset of the round over that, and it's delusional for someone to call that a 5-5.

Guess I'm fucking delusional
[close]

If you REALLY think there's grounds to call that 1v1 a 5-5...then yes. You lost the round, you know you lost the round.

If things had been swapped, w/ 93rd being down 4 in the last round, Nick breaking your line and getting slayed for rambo, you'd be saying it's a good call, and would've been pissed if it got reset.

Additionally, let's say Moraine didn't slay you.  5 of your guys still FoL'd, none of them received slays. Had Moraine slayed them for FoL instead of slaying you for rambo, you'd have been down 9 going into that melee. You just weren't winning that round. You actually got lucky he only slayed you, since having those 5 guys alive gave you the best chance at winning that round.

Spoiler
Oh and here's that 1v1 vs 6teSLR we since everyone has been messaging me to see the video  :P.



After watching that match, and the last round, 6te went into melee down 4 against a regiment that was consistently wrecking them in even melees through out the 1v1. I personally wouldn't have bothered slaying Irish, but him being alive or dead at that point is irrelevant, he didn't stop 6te from getting steamrolled in melees  during previous rounds, I couldn't reasonably say it would've been any different that round with a 4 man disadvantage. No reason to call for, or expect a reset of the round over that, and it's delusional for someone to call that a 5-5.

Guess I'm fucking delusional
I wanted a reset but Nick wouldn't allow it. It was mostly because of technical mass FOL of 6te when irish charged also Irish being more than 5 paces away from his line going for a charge.
[close]

Resetting because of the 6te FoL'ing due to Irish's charge would've been robbing 93rd of that round. It's a good thing you didn't reset.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2019, 01:48:50 am by Stroke0fd34th »
“There is absolutely nothing that can
prepare you for a duel with a space wizard
wielding a plasma sword”


Offline Sanders

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2146
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #301 on: February 19, 2019, 03:38:52 am »
Stop

Offline -Nick

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10739
  • Baby Braves #1
    • View Profile
  • Nick: ~WeastSide~
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #302 on: February 19, 2019, 05:02:09 am »
It's okay let the man be in denial & Vetro bout to get banned in 5 mins if he doesn't put my comp record back on the thread.  >:(

Offline PapaBean

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1328
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Papabean
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #303 on: February 19, 2019, 05:04:26 am »
Vetro getting banned

Offline VetroG

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 2376
    • View Profile
  • Nick: VetroG
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #304 on: February 19, 2019, 05:07:37 am »
Vetro getting banned
Sweeeeeeeet homeeeeeeeeeeeee Alabamaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Offline PapaBean

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1328
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Papabean
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #305 on: February 19, 2019, 05:20:30 am »
Here's Irish swinging his sword around at our line while his line is firing. I know there'a a pause button in the way just wait for it to go away in a few seconds.

https://gyazo.com/b1113717941e8a47915db86e34a7fa99
I can't see anything the video is too small.

You are probably one of the stupidest people if this really is your excuse.  You have ears use them.  You have eyes use them..... yet you do none of these...accept a loss and move on.  You want to know what I hear in the video?  A charge order and no one charges.  If I was reffing and saw that I would have slayed those that foled.  Thats a total of 5 slays.  Lets count together 1, 2 , 3, 4, 5,. 

Now....Moraine.  Calling a 5-5 match after a regiment quote on quote leaves the match after they win is a probs one of the most blatant issues with your reffing.  You have reffed enough matches to know the rules.  A reset because a regiment mass fols? So what you are telling me is that you know that they broke the rules, you didnt slay them, and you wanted to reset on their behalf?  Bitch please......I hope to god you arent a NANWL ref.  If that aint proof of bias I dont know what is. 

Anyways thats enough about that you silly kids.  Lets make sure we get all the kids who need to be on the short bus on to it.  Normal bus kids keep having a great day  8)

6-4

(edited by waste)
« Last Edit: February 19, 2019, 05:26:08 am by PapaBean »

Suns

  • Guest
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #306 on: February 19, 2019, 06:25:02 am »
Irish is just stubborn

stubborn enough to uplift his regiment's actual performance after play  :-[

Offline VetroG

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 2376
    • View Profile
  • Nick: VetroG
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #307 on: February 19, 2019, 03:16:28 pm »
De-stroyed....

Offline Eamon

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 2096
  • Leader of the 6teSLR | SjtMaj of the 15th_YR
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Irish
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #308 on: February 19, 2019, 03:56:29 pm »
If nobody hates you you aren't doing it right


Offline VetroG

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 2376
    • View Profile
  • Nick: VetroG
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #309 on: February 19, 2019, 04:04:27 pm »
If nobody hates you you aren't doing it right
Well you cheated so you defintlielty don’t have something right hence why people don’t like you. If you’re not whining like a little bitch and won’t accept the loss you’re not doing it right.

If you’re not poaching you’re not doing it right.

If you’re not cheating in two leagues you’re not doing it right.

If you don’t have a bias admin you’re not doing it right.

If you’re not giving 2 members officer ranks in 2 weeks you’re not doing it right.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2019, 04:10:40 pm by VetroG »

Offline Forgotfulking

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3334
  • Head Moderator for RGL League 2019 [NA]
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Lady Moraine
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #310 on: February 19, 2019, 04:10:58 pm »
If nobody hates you you aren't doing it right
Well you cheated so you defintlielty don’t have something right hence why people don’t like you. If you’re not whining like a little bitch and won’t accept the loss you’re not doing it right.

If you’re not poaching you’re not doing it right.

If you’re not cheating in two leagues you’re not doing it right.

If you don’t have a bias admin you’re not doing it right.
Did you just accuse me of being a bias admin? Because if so you're stupid kiddo.


Offline VetroG

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 2376
    • View Profile
  • Nick: VetroG
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #311 on: February 19, 2019, 04:12:33 pm »
If nobody hates you you aren't doing it right
Well you cheated so you defintlielty don’t have something right hence why people don’t like you. If you’re not whining like a little bitch and won’t accept the loss you’re not doing it right.

If you’re not poaching you’re not doing it right.

If you’re not cheating in two leagues you’re not doing it right.

If you don’t have a bias admin you’re not doing it right.
Did you just accuse me of being a bias admin? Because if so you're stupid kiddo.
Look at what Bean said maybe you’ll understand.

Offline Forgotfulking

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3334
  • Head Moderator for RGL League 2019 [NA]
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Lady Moraine
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #312 on: February 19, 2019, 04:16:05 pm »
Here's Irish swinging his sword around at our line while his line is firing. I know there'a a pause button in the way just wait for it to go away in a few seconds.

https://gyazo.com/b1113717941e8a47915db86e34a7fa99
I can't see anything the video is too small.

You are probably one of the stupidest people if this really is your excuse.  You have ears use them.  You have eyes use them..... yet you do none of these...accept a loss and move on.  You want to know what I hear in the video?  A charge order and no one charges.  If I was reffing and saw that I would have slayed those that foled.  Thats a total of 5 slays.  Lets count together 1, 2 , 3, 4, 5,. 

Now....Moraine.  Calling a 5-5 match after a regiment quote on quote leaves the match after they win is a probs one of the most blatant issues with your reffing.  You have reffed enough matches to know the rules.  A reset because a regiment mass fols? So what you are telling me is that you know that they broke the rules, you didnt slay them, and you wanted to reset on their behalf?  Bitch please......I hope to god you arent a NANWL ref.  If that aint proof of bias I dont know what is. 

Anyways thats enough about that you silly kids.  Lets make sure we get all the kids who need to be on the short bus on to it.  Normal bus kids keep having a great day  8)

6-4

(edited by waste)
You know I was asked to ref it thinking both regiments who've played in enough matches know the rules wouldn't be retards or wouldn't tryhard for a 1v1 that didn't matter but then again you weren't there so I don't really want to sit here and respond to this bait post. So I'll leave it at this. I didn't see Irish's charge because I was watching the 6te line up to fire thats why I didnt slay or didnt see what happened. I've stated this to both regiment leaders countless times. After rewatching the footage I noticed his spacing and counted his steps into melee which made me go check the rules for officer spaceing and rambo. After using that information I made the conclusion from 5-5 to 6-4 due to the officer spaceing rule.


Offline VetroG

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 2376
    • View Profile
  • Nick: VetroG
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #313 on: February 19, 2019, 04:18:08 pm »
Boom thank you Moraine so Irish like you told me on a Steam the night of the match “It’s Referees choice!” 6-4 we win final let’s leave it at that I just needed that opening statement from Moraine.

Offline Sanders

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2146
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 93rd "Sutherland Highlanders" Regiment of Foot
« Reply #314 on: February 19, 2019, 04:22:58 pm »
-snip-boys give it up
Reality check in order for every one aside from Bean/Moraine you Lightsaber wielding creeps
« Last Edit: February 19, 2019, 05:35:09 pm by Xethos »