Author Topic: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive  (Read 358960 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline William

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 8461
  • What doth life?
    • View Profile
    • Youtube Channel where I upload NW and M&B
  • Nick: CluelessWill
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6810 on: November 29, 2018, 08:37:48 pm »
Any of you all want to crowdfund a CSGO team?
Check out my YT channel where I post NW www.youtube. com/c/CluelessWill
Spoiler
god damn, Anthony is smart, he was able to get the shit AEF to tie with the best reg in the game. The tactical geniusness needed to pull off such a feat is insane. He's the Erwin Rommel of NW.
i always get an erection when i check my subscrptions and see that phresh cluelesswill vid
It won't be FSE developing it, so it will come out!
[close]

Offline John Price

  • Block guys what is this!?
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 18158
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6811 on: November 29, 2018, 09:27:09 pm »
As long as its called the 18e.

Not sure why, just came to me.

Offline William

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 8461
  • What doth life?
    • View Profile
    • Youtube Channel where I upload NW and M&B
  • Nick: CluelessWill
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6812 on: November 29, 2018, 09:46:04 pm »
I can't tell if Liquid is falling off or NRG is just this good.
Check out my YT channel where I post NW www.youtube. com/c/CluelessWill
Spoiler
god damn, Anthony is smart, he was able to get the shit AEF to tie with the best reg in the game. The tactical geniusness needed to pull off such a feat is insane. He's the Erwin Rommel of NW.
i always get an erection when i check my subscrptions and see that phresh cluelesswill vid
It won't be FSE developing it, so it will come out!
[close]

Offline John Price

  • Block guys what is this!?
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 18158
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6813 on: November 29, 2018, 10:23:36 pm »
I can't tell if Liquid is falling off or NRG is just this good.
NRG is a really good team tbf.

But the real answer to your question is Liquid are ass.

Offline William

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 8461
  • What doth life?
    • View Profile
    • Youtube Channel where I upload NW and M&B
  • Nick: CluelessWill
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6814 on: November 29, 2018, 11:24:39 pm »
I can't tell if Liquid is falling off or NRG is just this good.
NRG is a really good team tbf.

But the real answer to your question is Liquid are ass.
Liquid surprised me and came back. I know they have a tendency to lose the 1st map and rebound the other two but it seemed really telling of NRG's potential. I still think that NRG needs to replace Fugly, and if it was a dream pick: bntet.
Check out my YT channel where I post NW www.youtube. com/c/CluelessWill
Spoiler
god damn, Anthony is smart, he was able to get the shit AEF to tie with the best reg in the game. The tactical geniusness needed to pull off such a feat is insane. He's the Erwin Rommel of NW.
i always get an erection when i check my subscrptions and see that phresh cluelesswill vid
It won't be FSE developing it, so it will come out!
[close]

Online Marceaux

  • Donator
  • **
  • Posts: 6276
  • Je suis immortel.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Marcy
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6815 on: November 29, 2018, 11:57:10 pm »
I have never liked Fugly idk why... -Fugly +motm plz and ty?

Offline Alexander

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 6700
  • Being the best is not enough for me. Deal with it.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6816 on: November 30, 2018, 12:32:11 am »
 ::)

Offline Tardet

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 6640
  • Fidelitate et Honore
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Tardet
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6817 on: November 30, 2018, 07:26:39 am »
I can't tell if Liquid is falling off or NRG is just this good.
NRG is a really good team tbf.

But the real answer to your question is Liquid are ass.
Liquid surprised me and came back. I know they have a tendency to lose the 1st map and rebound the other two but it seemed really telling of NRG's potential. I still think that NRG needs to replace Fugly, and if it was a dream pick: bntet.

On top of that tendency, they played one of the best team on Overpass. Despite the rather one-sided scoreline, it was expected from pretty everyone that NRG would take this map, especially after the strong come-back they made on the first side. The worrying factor for me was Inferno where Liquid was clearly favourite and still struggled to take the victory, which to me is a clear indication of their current weak form. NRG can have lots of regrets not being able to close it 2-0 but that's also why Liquid is still a Top3 team (and not 'ass' as Mr Britcunt so nicely put it out). You can't just let them underperform, you also have to play at your best on eventually all three maps.

Either way, this is clearly Liquid's tournament to lose but I am not too worried. NRG is clearly the biggest threat in the whole tournament. If BIG wakes up and trash Gambit (which I expect them to do), then this could get interesting, but anything but a win would be clear underperformance from Liquid and they are not at a state where they can allow themselves to throw T2 tournaments.





Wasn't worried, not even a second.  8)

« Last Edit: November 30, 2018, 07:28:29 am by Tardet »
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often.


Online Marceaux

  • Donator
  • **
  • Posts: 6276
  • Je suis immortel.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Marcy
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6818 on: November 30, 2018, 06:59:30 pm »
G2 better crush these South Africans! ;D

Online Marceaux

  • Donator
  • **
  • Posts: 6276
  • Je suis immortel.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Marcy
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6819 on: November 30, 2018, 08:35:12 pm »

Offline Nero_

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 5691
  • savoir-faire
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6820 on: November 30, 2018, 08:36:17 pm »
so like are these south africans good or is g2 god awful

Offline Lightning.

  • German Language Moderator
  • Language Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 890
  • Inquisitor
    • View Profile
    • Steamprofile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6821 on: November 30, 2018, 08:40:27 pm »
French CS lul

Offline Tardet

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 6640
  • Fidelitate et Honore
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Tardet
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6822 on: November 30, 2018, 08:48:41 pm »
so like are these south africans good or is g2 god awful

They also beat Optic 16-14 in their opening match but not sure how to answer your question. Technically speaking, they have the worst HLTV ranking out of all the remaining teams in that tournament (#49), closely followed by x6tence Galaxy (#48).

But yeah, Bo1s often have random outcomes, lets way to see what they have to offer in Bo3s.
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often.


Online Marceaux

  • Donator
  • **
  • Posts: 6276
  • Je suis immortel.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Marcy
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6823 on: November 30, 2018, 08:52:33 pm »
so like are these south africans good or is g2 god awful

Honestly looked like a bit of both. Bravado had an outstanding CT and most of them looked like very solid aimers individually. On the other hand G2 was doing quite well up until T side and then they just looked FLAT, literally no strategy other then rush outside or rush squeaky. I think they took ramp control MAYBE 1 round? They also didn't slow down the pace until the last few rounds and by then it was way to late.

That being said i think the biggest mistake G2 made was allowing Nuke to be played in a bo1. Its a much more strategic map then some of the other choices and Bravado obviously have more time together as a team and a deeper pool and playbook. So i do not understand why tf G2 would want to play Nuke of all maps vs them. I feel like ANYTHING else would have been a better choice.

Hopefully G2 can beat OpTic or ENCE tomorrow and make the playoffs.

Offline John Price

  • Block guys what is this!?
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 18158
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #6824 on: December 01, 2018, 01:08:59 pm »
Bravado always play well in MDL etc. so it doesn't surprise me that G2 choked again.