Messages

16

Regiments / Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot

« on: September 16, 2014, 09:08:51 pm »

At the time, he was one of us, sometimes people feel like standing up for their own, obviously, Pol Pot proved to be "unworthy" of it.

17

Regiments / Re: 75th Regiment of Foot (Abercromby's Highlanders)

« on: September 16, 2014, 09:06:30 pm »

Despite the history, I wish you good luck.

18

Regiments / Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot

« on: September 16, 2014, 09:02:50 pm »

Seems like it did not work out without us. 

Even replying to you is stupid but here it is

Pol Pot, you are a nothing, alright? You leaving was one of the better things that happened. Your whole ideology is all nice and cute, breaking chains and shit.
But, you know what? If the world was filled with Communism, you'd still be worthless in it.

And what about your regiment for a moment, it's small, you can't fight for shit, your sense of having fun was "killing teammates", you kicked some of your friends out for no reason at all, how did that work out? Hmm.

So, instead of you having at least the slightest hint of maturity, you decide to be a little punk, big words for a small man.

19

Regiments / Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot

« on: August 25, 2014, 06:30:52 pm »

Lmao.

20

Regiments / Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot

« on: August 16, 2014, 12:28:46 pm »

32e LEL

who r  they

Who are you

21

Regiments / Re: 1st Kings Royal Regiment *Always Recruiting*

« on: August 15, 2014, 12:12:11 am »

Good luck weezy and mazer! i remember you from the 84e.

Cpl_Chriseh

Thanks Chriseh !

Rule #1 of FSE. STOP DOUBLE POSTING NOOB

22

Regiments / Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot

« on: August 15, 2014, 12:11:51 am »

Still bad.

23

Regiments / Re: 19e Regiment d'Infanterie de Ligne *Recruiting EU*

« on: August 15, 2014, 12:11:25 am »

autism?

yes

Someone's being watched ^^

24

Regiments / Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot

« on: August 14, 2014, 01:48:31 pm »

Bumping is humping the letter "B"

25

Regiments / Re: 19e Regiment d'Infanterie de Ligne *Recruiting EU*

« on: August 13, 2014, 10:22:36 am »

Spanish sucks, Czech language ftw

Ehh, no.

26

Regiments / Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot

« on: August 13, 2014, 10:09:38 am »

hai

Looking good Rune

27

Events / Re: Bragg's Brigade's North and South NA/EU Sunday Siege 4 PM EST/9 PM GMT

« on: August 10, 2014, 09:49:35 pm »

Regiment Name: 9thLA
Regiment Tags: DA_9thLA_Rank_Name
Preferred Role: Infantry
Expected Number: 15-30
Leader's Steam Name: [45th] Rapid
Do you plan to show up every week: yes

28

North & South: First Manassas / Re: Troop Stats in N&S(UPDATED FOR V.5)

« on: August 07, 2014, 02:27:05 pm »

I dunno, I personally like the stats having a semblence of historical accuracy. Giving the 69th more melee stats and ironflesh would make sense considering their battle doctrine was more focused on the Bayonet at the start of the war.

Historical Accuracy = Unfun, Unbalanced, Unfair Line Battles.

Historical Accuracy up to a point. But the majority of things stats wise should be balanced with their opposite number. +/- <10 isnt too bad though.

Hmm, I'd like to add that that historical accuracy might not be as bad as some people see it, however, some regiments prefer shooting, some prefer melee, that's how units should be, there shouldn't be a unit that can take on Tigers on long range as well as take on Iron Brigade in melee, so, finding the balance mixed with historical accuracy should calm things down. On the other hand, I'm not good with stats or the Civil War in general, but I'm sure Hinkel can handle it and the community can help be sharing their opinions

29

Regiments / Re: 45th (1st Nottinghamshire) Regiment of Foot

« on: August 06, 2014, 04:40:28 pm »

I love the fail of the day

30

North & South: First Manassas / Re: Troop Stats in N&S(UPDATED FOR V.5)

« on: August 04, 2014, 11:15:12 am »

Oke so, thank you for posting stats but I'd appreciate it if you at least had respect for Hinkel instead of calling him crazy, he made the mod for us, I'm sure he'll work on it but saying there's no reason to play as any other class, means you saying classes win battles, well buddy, players win them, commanding increases/decreases chances of men preforming better/worse, so, a class being stronger than another doesn't mean you have to call the developer insane in which case I'd just tell you to get the hell out of the community if you can't be thankful, and another thing regarding cavalry is that it can dismount and it can fire so yeah.