Flying Squirrel Entertainment

Mount & Blade Warband: Napoleonic Wars => Community => Topic started by: 74th_MacTavish on March 02, 2013, 03:09:51 pm

Title: Something Interesting From Groupfighting
Post by: 74th_MacTavish on March 02, 2013, 03:09:51 pm
http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/882975576981285180/A7FB9C13A5E8CD969C52E31B45B9FDFD115C8929/

One of the 91st admins permabanned a player for shooting the first time.

I had never seen him before, or any rule breaking associated with him and I play GF on a regular basis (daily, for 2 hours on avg).

This is Tavington's response when I said they should respect the slay + kick + Temp Sequence. It truly amuses me how some people refuse to stop digging that hole...


Anyone else still in support of him getting unbanned from FSE forums? Didn't think so.

PS: Been hearing alot of great stuff about the other GF servers going up, such as the 44th_NW_Groupfighting -> Recommend.
Title: Re: Something Interesting From Groupfighting
Post by: Matthew on March 02, 2013, 03:24:13 pm
They can ban who ever they like it is their own server, most people are aware that the 91st enforces rules very strictly on their server, i'm sure if he posted an unban they would see he had learnt his lesson and allow him back.
Title: Re: Something Interesting From Groupfighting
Post by: PrideofNi on March 02, 2013, 03:25:43 pm
Strange because 2nd round I was logged in with admin, I had to slay the guy that got perma'd for shooting. Please don't make assumptions, it tends to help.
Title: Re: Something Interesting From Groupfighting
Post by: Bashy on March 02, 2013, 03:34:53 pm
Strange because 2nd round I was logged in with admin, I had to slay the guy that got perma'd for shooting. Please don't make assumptions, it tends to help.

As Pride put it ^, don't presume things and attempting to create a flame war on these forums, it's not at all healthy.
Title: Re: Something Interesting From Groupfighting
Post by: Kator Viridian on March 02, 2013, 03:36:37 pm
Strange because 2nd round I was logged in with admin, I had to slay the guy that got perma'd for shooting. Please don't make assumptions, it tends to help.

As Pride put it ^, don't presume things and attempting to create a flame war on these forums, it's not at all healthy.

By responding you are instigating it, Ni had already stated as to why it happened backing him up is pretty pointless considering he is an admin already. No point in throwing coal onto a roaring fire is there?
Title: Re: Something Interesting From Groupfighting
Post by: Tardet on March 02, 2013, 03:39:11 pm
You again ?  ;D

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=3465.0

Try to act like a mature person , you have been banned on two famous server , and it's never your fault ;)

Title: Re: Something Interesting From Groupfighting
Post by: Bashy on March 02, 2013, 03:40:03 pm
Strange because 2nd round I was logged in with admin, I had to slay the guy that got perma'd for shooting. Please don't make assumptions, it tends to help.

As Pride put it ^, don't presume things and attempting to create a flame war on these forums, it's not at all healthy.

By responding you are instigating it, Ni had already stated as to why it happened backing him up is pretty pointless considering he is an admin already. No point in throwing coal onto a roaring fire is there?

Or you could look at the definition of instigate, anyhow. I am replying to this thread by stating my opinion, you're instigating an argument with me now, so. "No point in throwing coal onto a roaring fire is there?"
Title: Re: Something Interesting From Groupfighting
Post by: Blobmania on March 02, 2013, 11:38:42 pm
As far as dealing with this goes, FSE cannot intervene in issues concerning a privately-owned server. Similarly though, MacTavish has every right to "Warn" the community about admin abuse on private servers (As I believe many supporters of the 91st server were "Warning" people about the 84e siege server, recently).

My advice would be to find another server to use, MacTavish.
Title: Re: Something Interesting From Groupfighting
Post by: 74th_MacTavish on March 03, 2013, 12:05:16 am
As far as dealing with this goes, FSE cannot intervene in issues concerning a privately-owned server. Similarly though, MacTavish has every right to "Warn" the community about admin abuse on private servers (As I believe many supporters of the 91st server were "Warning" people about the 84e siege server, recently).

My advice would be to find another server to use, MacTavish.

Exactly my hope Blobmania =) pointing that out.