I'm confused..so this is an alternate reality where I guess some advanced technology is used in world war 1?I saw no advanced technology? It does look alternate to me though, which is pretty sick tbh
I personally hope we're playing as a normal grunt as opposed to one of those Stormtrooper-esq soldiers with the maces. I'm sick of playing as a super soldier in here games.Stormtroopers are WW1 soldiers tho - and trench clubs were things :D
I personally hope we're playing as a normal grunt as opposed to one of those Stormtrooper-esq soldiers with the maces. I'm sick of playing as a super soldier in here games.Stormtroopers are WW1 soldiers tho - and trench clubs were things :D
If you want story - go play Valiant Hearts, if you want realism - go play Verdun. I'm not sure how playing a no-name grunt would be interesting, and on top of that this is BF.I personally hope we're playing as a normal grunt as opposed to one of those Stormtrooper-esq soldiers with the maces. I'm sick of playing as a super soldier in here games.Stormtroopers are WW1 soldiers tho - and trench clubs were things :D
I acknowledge that Stormtroopers were a thing but they were more shock infantry, I'd prefer a story revolving around a no name grunt just trying to survive.
Lawrence of Arabia...SOLDCampaign for him confirmed :DDDD
If you want story - go play Valiant Hearts, if you want realism - go play Verdun. I'm not sure how playing a no-name grunt would be interesting, and on top of that this is BF.I personally hope we're playing as a normal grunt as opposed to one of those Stormtrooper-esq soldiers with the maces. I'm sick of playing as a super soldier in here games.Stormtroopers are WW1 soldiers tho - and trench clubs were things :D
I acknowledge that Stormtroopers were a thing but they were more shock infantry, I'd prefer a story revolving around a no name grunt just trying to survive.
I'm just giving my view, the grunt gameplay to me would seem slightly stale.If you want story - go play Valiant Hearts, if you want realism - go play Verdun. I'm not sure how playing a no-name grunt would be interesting, and on top of that this is BF.I personally hope we're playing as a normal grunt as opposed to one of those Stormtrooper-esq soldiers with the maces. I'm sick of playing as a super soldier in here games.Stormtroopers are WW1 soldiers tho - and trench clubs were things :D
I acknowledge that Stormtroopers were a thing but they were more shock infantry, I'd prefer a story revolving around a no name grunt just trying to survive.
Are you kidding? Charging across no mans land avoiding shells, machine gun fire, etc... That would be fucking insane! Being a normal guy has it's merits in story telling, for one thing it makes the character far more relatable. There are a host of things they could do with a story revolving around a traditional infantry man, pilot, or tanker.
I'm just giving my view, the grunt gameplay to me would seem slightly stale.If you want story - go play Valiant Hearts, if you want realism - go play Verdun. I'm not sure how playing a no-name grunt would be interesting, and on top of that this is BF.I personally hope we're playing as a normal grunt as opposed to one of those Stormtrooper-esq soldiers with the maces. I'm sick of playing as a super soldier in here games.Stormtroopers are WW1 soldiers tho - and trench clubs were things :D
I acknowledge that Stormtroopers were a thing but they were more shock infantry, I'd prefer a story revolving around a no name grunt just trying to survive.
Are you kidding? Charging across no mans land avoiding shells, machine gun fire, etc... That would be fucking insane! Being a normal guy has it's merits in story telling, for one thing it makes the character far more relatable. There are a host of things they could do with a story revolving around a traditional infantry man, pilot, or tanker.
I do agree on that, but I only think the immersion and experience would be amazing. I cannot seeing it used as a basis for constant gameplay, that's just beyond me. (also maybe no pyramido)I'm just giving my view, the grunt gameplay to me would seem slightly stale.If you want story - go play Valiant Hearts, if you want realism - go play Verdun. I'm not sure how playing a no-name grunt would be interesting, and on top of that this is BF.I personally hope we're playing as a normal grunt as opposed to one of those Stormtrooper-esq soldiers with the maces. I'm sick of playing as a super soldier in here games.Stormtroopers are WW1 soldiers tho - and trench clubs were things :D
I acknowledge that Stormtroopers were a thing but they were more shock infantry, I'd prefer a story revolving around a no name grunt just trying to survive.
Are you kidding? Charging across no mans land avoiding shells, machine gun fire, etc... That would be fucking insane! Being a normal guy has it's merits in story telling, for one thing it makes the character far more relatable. There are a host of things they could do with a story revolving around a traditional infantry man, pilot, or tanker.
I'd have to agree with Ryner, the grunt gameplay would be amazing. Imagine getting an order to charge and bomb shells are exploding next to you, you can hear the screams of your comrades as shrapnel tears through them, mustard gas being deployed and you can hear the choking of it's victims. It would give a level of immersion and reality that would give a new look into World War 1. I'm stoked for it!
lol i still bet its gonna suck lelelelelProbably, yeah.
I dont understand where you are getting the alternate reality part from tbh.Steampunk? Idk
Sorta got the same vibe seeing some of the units.I dont understand where you are getting the alternate reality part from tbh.Steampunk? Idk
Its just spice really. They have to add things into the trailer but I highly doubt they will do alternate reality. There has been talk of doing ww1-ww2-vietnam-coldwar-..... For a while now.Sorta got the same vibe seeing some of the units.I dont understand where you are getting the alternate reality part from tbh.Steampunk? Idk
lol this isn't going to be "charging across no-mans land" with coordinated charges and anything historical it will be running around with your maxim gun in your right hand and a dynamite stick in your left. To think that this game will be at all immersive is silly, it does look cool and pretty but this will definitely not be a true WW1 shooter. the closest you can get to a somewhat realistic WW1 is probably Iron Europe. Also, if they're going to have these huge maps with planes and tanks and artillery, player count might seem a bit out of scale having 20 infantry on your team and the other 12 or so being some sort of specialty will probably make it seem pretty small. imo they should do away with the big map sizes or somehow increase the player count to compensate and then I think it would be pretty coolI do agree on that, but I only think the immersion and experience would be amazing. I cannot seeing it used as a basis for constant gameplay, that's just beyond me. (also maybe no pyramido)I'm just giving my view, the grunt gameplay to me would seem slightly stale.If you want story - go play Valiant Hearts, if you want realism - go play Verdun. I'm not sure how playing a no-name grunt would be interesting, and on top of that this is BF.I personally hope we're playing as a normal grunt as opposed to one of those Stormtrooper-esq soldiers with the maces. I'm sick of playing as a super soldier in here games.Stormtroopers are WW1 soldiers tho - and trench clubs were things :D
I acknowledge that Stormtroopers were a thing but they were more shock infantry, I'd prefer a story revolving around a no name grunt just trying to survive.
Are you kidding? Charging across no mans land avoiding shells, machine gun fire, etc... That would be fucking insane! Being a normal guy has it's merits in story telling, for one thing it makes the character far more relatable. There are a host of things they could do with a story revolving around a traditional infantry man, pilot, or tanker.
I'd have to agree with Ryner, the grunt gameplay would be amazing. Imagine getting an order to charge and bomb shells are exploding next to you, you can hear the screams of your comrades as shrapnel tears through them, mustard gas being deployed and you can hear the choking of it's victims. It would give a level of immersion and reality that would give a new look into World War 1. I'm stoked for it!
First time im hyped for a Battlefield part
I see cav 8)Looks like were converting to a BF reg ;D
First time im hyped for a Battlefield part
I see cav 8)Looks like were converting to a BF reg ;D
(https://i.imgur.com/igoZg6z.jpg?1)
Personally I'd like it if they stripped back a lot of the things like medics and engineers, given how unrealistic either would be in a WW1 scenario. Charging across muddy craters with bullets whizzing past would be amazing, but they probably won't go that route because stalemates and balance issues (MGs OP).
Tanks should be incredibly rare, rather than the disposable jets you get in the current gen. If they actually put in the effort to recreate a proper WW1 style battlefield (as in the place not the game) then I think it could be amazing. In reality though, I feel like it will play very much like all the recent BF games.
Also I assume that bright green was supposed to be chlorine gas. Super unrealistic, but I suppose otherwise the average gamers would complain. Wish they'd tone down the colour of it, but ah well.
Personally I'd like it if they stripped back a lot of the things like medics and engineers, given how unrealistic either would be in a WW1 scenario. Charging across muddy craters with bullets whizzing past would be amazing, but they probably won't go that route because stalemates and balance issues (MGs OP).
Tanks should be incredibly rare, rather than the disposable jets you get in the current gen. If they actually put in the effort to recreate a proper WW1 style battlefield (as in the place not the game) then I think it could be amazing. In reality though, I feel like it will play very much like all the recent BF games.
Also I assume that bright green was supposed to be chlorine gas. Super unrealistic, but I suppose otherwise the average gamers would complain. Wish they'd tone down the colour of it, but ah well.
Remember that the game is coming out on PS4 and XBOX, we have to amuse the masses of console users.
Like where are you getting all this from? Videos have been shown regarding balancing the class system for the era so you should have done some research before ranting.SpoilerSpoilerIt's looking liek total crap in my opinion. I mean wtf is this shit except arcade-like, unrealistic, idiotic shit-gameplay? "Let's run with my maxim-mg in my left and a grenade in my right through the desert sniping ppl 500 metres away" or what?
I mean let's be honest: They are going to have the old Assault - Medic - Support - Scout classsystem (the medic will be able to revive dead - I mean what the fuck how?) as well as tanks moving over the battlefield with 20 km/h - god fuck this game.
Look at this shitty crap:
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2images.cgames.de%2Fimages%2Fidgwpgsgp%2Fbdb%2F2754943%2F600x338.jpg&hash=a4858f37631bdbe21967257615c0a4258c52e484)
Basically says it all.[close][close]
FINALLY! Been waiting for World war 1 game, I can't wait for to play as the Byzantine Empire and retake Antioch from the Egyptians.
I personally wanted World War 2, Korea, or the Vietnam War. Vietnam would have been crazy to see. I can just picture the Huey;s and chinooks, combat drop offs, Phantom's strafing and battling MIG's, napalm everywhere, AK's firing, m16's jamming, just the full package. Looks like I'll have to wait at least 2 more years though.. :(
I'm confused..so this is an alternate reality where I guess some advanced technology is used in world war 1?
FINALLY! Been waiting for World war 1 game, I can't wait for to play as the Byzantine Empire and retake Antioch from the Egyptians.
Wait, wasn't that AFTER WW1 when the Iranians accused the Swedish government of aiding the Buddhist rebels in northern Ethiopia ?
Since when is Battlefield aiming for realism?
Since when is Battlefield aiming for realism?
Play Verdun. It's way better.o you played Battlefield 1 already?
Play Verdun. It's way better.
Play Verdun. It's way better.
Because Ted can judge a game from a trailer.
Verdun sucks ^^Play Verdun. It's way better.
Because Ted can judge a game from a trailer.
We will see.
it doesnt, your opinion is invalid! :'(Verdun sucks ^^Play Verdun. It's way better.
Because Ted can judge a game from a trailer.
We will see.
Next time on Battlefield, Battlefield: Napoleonic Wars !
as the long-time verdun pro i'm telling you it sucks, might be a bit addicting tho lolit doesnt, your opinion is invalid! :'(Verdun sucks ^^Play Verdun. It's way better.
Because Ted can judge a game from a trailer.
We will see.
Play Verdun. It's way better.
Because Ted can judge a game from a trailer.
We will see.
Yea because Battlefield is known for its realism and historical accuracy right? Oh wait.Play Verdun. It's way better.
Because Ted can judge a game from a trailer.
We will see.
Should I say "told ya"? Maybe. If the Concept Art looks as historical inaccurate as this then everyone should know how the real game will be. Inaccurate shitty fuckshit teaching kiddies stuff like "In WW1 people jumped out of their plane with a parachute in order to attack enemy trenches from above making trenches pointless because you can simply roll over with your 30mph fast tank or rush in with your flamethrower from the sky"
Look. At. This. Crap.Spoiler(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F5images.cgames.de%2Fimages%2Fidgwpgsgp%2Fbdb%2F2758026%2F600x338.jpg&hash=ee7bfbcdf5ec1aeaf9c0b8f6230f5a83551876e4)
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F8images.cgames.de%2Fimages%2Fidgwpgsgp%2Fbdb%2F2758031%2F600x338.jpg&hash=7ddc9ba883187c539e6db385d3e9cefd217b40bd)
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4images.cgames.de%2Fimages%2Fidgwpgsgp%2Fbdb%2F2758025%2F600x338.jpg&hash=b4cc3ed7075b95fc129fcc87640c18a49cd0f3ed)
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F10images.cgames.de%2Fimages%2Fidgwpgsgp%2Fbdb%2F2758022%2F600x338.jpg&hash=d001092e6199de00fa6252cdc7ed2015218c9bc6)[close]
Pretty much yeh. Still going to enjoy it, regardless that it butchered the WWI concept.
Wtf did you cheeseballs expect from EA?
Wtf did you cheeseballs expect from EA?
Def got a ww2 vibe.. Along with it obviously being unrealistic but also lack of popping up shooting, reloading, charging out of trenches which encompassed the majority of the war..
During the gameplay showcase they said that the weaponry will be: Semi Auto, Submachine, Heavy Machine Guns.
So yes, no bolt action rifles. I don't even know where they got that idea from, that they had semi autos in WW1. They DIDNT. And the first submachine gun was introduced in 1918...
Sure, some light machine guns could be hip fired, but they wouldn't really work as submachine gun.
So yeah, like I said a few weeks ago. Someone decided that there cant be a game where you can not spit a million bullets every second, so they made this shit out of it. I knew it.
EHM ACTUALLY THE FRENCH HAD SEMI AUTO RIFLES -.- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusil_Automatique_Mod%C3%A8le_1917
I wonder what Battlefield fans would have said if EA actually made Battlefield 1 a ultra realistic WWI game (like Verdun).
the game looks good it's just not historically accurateDuring the gameplay showcase they said that the weaponry will be: Semi Auto, Submachine, Heavy Machine Guns.
So yes, no bolt action rifles. I don't even know where they got that idea from, that they had semi autos in WW1. They DIDNT. And the first submachine gun was introduced in 1918...
Sure, some light machine guns could be hip fired, but they wouldn't really work as submachine gun.
So yeah, like I said a few weeks ago. Someone decided that there cant be a game where you can not spit a million bullets every second, so they made this shit out of it. I knew it.
Told you. It's total crap.
The fuck... I really hope they add bolt-action rifles or just forgot to mention it. By the way there were semi-automatic rifles since like 1906. I don't think soldiers really used them. But they did exist. Both winchester and remington had created semi-automatic small arms.
The fuck... I really hope they add bolt-action rifles or just forgot to mention it. By the way there were semi-automatic rifles since like 1906. I don't think soldiers really used them. But they did exist. Both winchester and remington had created semi-automatic small arms.
The drum mags also existed btw ;)
Alright boys, cancel the game. Some bloke on FSE says he isn't fine with it being branded a WW1 game. Back to the drawing-room!idiot
Well my point was that I knew of no Semi autos being issued in large numbers. And there were no. Even the german submachine gun was not issued in large quantities.
Wait, so Russia which was one of the main participants of WW1 won't be included, and France will come in as some bullshit overpriced premium DLC?every company just milks their games for money now a days.
Fucking hell, EA. I thought we would actually be getting a good game from EA for once that we could enjoy but nope. Just realized that they're gonna milk it with premium DLC and all such crap.
Ottomans are in even, Russkies and Frenchies are not"historical game"
Good historical game ye?
America is the only nation that actually matters
Yeah and the US is like the least important western power at that time. It really only played a minor role at the end of the war.WE WON THE WAR AND SAVED THE WORLD
Yeah and the US is like the least important western power at that time. It really only played a minor role at the end of the war.WE WON THE WAR AND SAVED THE WORLD
FUCK YEA, AMERICA SAVES EVERYONE'S ASS AGAIN. JUST HOW IT SHOULD BE YOU COMMIE BASTARDSYeah and the US is like the least important western power at that time. It really only played a minor role at the end of the war.WE WON THE WAR AND SAVED THE WORLD
NEVER FORGET THE ENGLISH ALSO M80Sill hack the game just for you
Btw finally no little birds or heavy attack choppers firing zumi rockets at my ass again.
Heheh. I just saw that video of 2 girls accusing the game for being sexist. What a joke. ;Dthey also said that link from legend of zelda should be female
Heheh. I just saw that video of 2 girls accusing the game for being sexist. What a joke. ;DThat is really a thing? If they had women in the game within a few months the feminists would be claiming it is sexist because you can shoot women!
This looks amazing. *_*I sure hope these elite troop classes are not pick ups on the battlefield. That system sucks in my opinion. You can randomize the locations sure with this system, but it just does not feel right to me. (I hated it when trying the 2015 Battlefront) A element of randomization helps keep things interesting not knowing who will be an elite troop, or the highest scoring of perhaps one to three players.
Beta on 31st of august is going to be niiice. D:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUflVGQelpE
He looks indeed a bit feminine. Please keep Battlefield how it was and no female characters. I hope Lawrence gets an update. Normally it should. Game only comes out in October.I sure hope Lawrence is not a woman in-game. He was a male in history, even if there is discussion of his sexual orientation. That's just me being traditional to characters and in this case whom are historic people who actually existed. I guess we'll see later on, and the latter you mentioned with females possibly being in multiplayer. Which seems very unlikely with what is shown, at least thus far.
I mean in Multiplayer then. :P
Been playing early acces as a sniper. 45-2 kd. Game goes smooth. Didnt have lag on console. No bugs seen yet. Fantastic beta experience for me.
Been playing early acces as a sniper. 45-2 kd. Game goes smooth. Didnt have lag on console. No bugs seen yet. Fantastic beta experience for me.
Bold: there comes the stereotype BF player
Underlined: That doesn't seem something that us possible
Nothing against Battlefield and nothing against 1. The only reason I hate the series is that there are still people claiming it's realism-based.
I never said it is a realism game. I just enjoyed it.
The beta is free for everyone today if you want to try it out. But yes these old cods were absolute fun.
*Throw Thermal Grenade*The beta is free for everyone today if you want to try it out. But yes these old cods were absolute fun.
Nice - a beta just like Battlefront. Ill try it out.
I've played the Beta and I'm definitely not going to buy it. It has confirmed every prejudice I had, it is extremly bad balanced and playing it feels more like playing a bad Battlefront then being in WW1. WW1 was all about static combat, yet I do not see ANYTHING static but armored trains driving around all cool instead. No, no and no - I'm not going to buy it if the final game is like the Beta. It's no real Battlefield but also no real WW1-Shooter, it's just crap so far.I'll have a vid going up tomorrow or the next day on the beta but yeah, I was playing it tonight for a good hour or so and I found out basically whoever has a tank wins the game.
I've played the Beta and I'm definitely not going to buy it. It has confirmed every prejudice I had, it is extremly bad balanced and playing it feels more like playing a bad Battlefront then being in WW1. WW1 was all about static combat, yet I do not see ANYTHING static but armored trains driving around all cool instead. No, no and no - I'm not going to buy it if the final game is like the Beta. It's no real Battlefield but also no real WW1-Shooter, it's just crap so far.
I tried installing and playing the beta on my Xbox but it says multiplayer privileges not found or something like that? Any idea what that is
I tried installing and playing the beta on my Xbox but it says multiplayer privileges not found or something like that? Any idea what that isCheck your privileges. console scum.
Tanks are op because we have no way to deal with them as infantry atm also map is relatively open with fewish buildings to hide in which is ideal for a tank really since those few buildings can be blown up anyways.
tanks are pretty op. You probably never played a good tank driverTanks are op because we have no way to deal with them as infantry atm also map is relatively open with fewish buildings to hide in which is ideal for a tank really since those few buildings can be blown up anyways.
I think you are just a noob.
With 2 assault guys, every tank is done within 10 seconds.
Never had a problem to kill a tank myself.
tanks are pretty op. You probably never played a good tank driverTanks are op because we have no way to deal with them as infantry atm also map is relatively open with fewish buildings to hide in which is ideal for a tank really since those few buildings can be blown up anyways.
I think you are just a noob.
With 2 assault guys, every tank is done within 10 seconds.
Never had a problem to kill a tank myself.
Not a fan of the campaign. Extremely repetitive and easily forgettableIs it more repetitive then Mafia?
At first I didn't want to get Battlefield 1, but I like campaign games even if they are a bit repetetive.
Multiplayer maps look waayyyyy better than battlefield 4. Defo getting this game.
At first I didn't want to get Battlefield 1, but I like campaign games even if they are a bit repetetive.
Multiplayer maps look waayyyyy better than battlefield 4. Defo getting this game.
Yeah the map making team and overall the ones responsible for graphics did quite admirable job but still, would get it only for free or in a massive discount. :p
Pls no. Everyone will have repeating rifles and pistols. How silly would that be.
Watching the cavalry game play just made me want a Battlefield game set during the Civil War.pls no
If you were on Console I would play with you, but I don't play on PC anymore. Really busy u know. :P