Movement is no more
Thank god.
Anyway when you think about it, why would it not be fair to make a run-off vote after this one with the two most popular options? I don't agree with the point that was made that when you vote for yes you vote for yes* as well. Certainly I am an advocate against double regging but this has plagued the NW community for ages. In the golden age of NW, all the good regiments didn't have to go around begging people from other regiments to join them so that they could have a better chance at winning an online league. Nowadays all I see is steam groups of the top regiments, with members with other regimental tags. I mean when you play for one regiment in RGL that shouldn't mean you have the right to just straight up play for other regiments because you have a commitment to one already. What I see as well are regimental leaders going around cavalry regiments and skirmisher regiments, and getting the good players from that to join their regiment for RGL. Now they wouldn't attend any normal events, but just the RGL ones. It's honestly much the same to making a groupfighting team and not a regiment. But this is
Regimental Groupfighting League, so it's saddening to see such acceptance for such counter-productive policies.