Author Topic: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?  (Read 14988 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Augy

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 2970
  • Anarchist. Absurdist. Existentialist. Man. Human.
    • View Profile
    • The Royal Recruits
  • Nick: -[TRR]- Cpt. Augy
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #30 on: October 15, 2013, 09:18:32 pm »
No platform for fascism works.

Take it to the political spectrum thread if you want to spread your 'political' lies. This thread isn't to discuss whether Communism or Fascism works.

I don't care as it ultimately doesn't matter.
“Ego is a structure that is erected by a neurotic individual who is a member of a neurotic culture against the facts of the matter. And culture, which we put on like an overcoat, is the collectivized consensus about what sort of neurotic behaviors are acceptable.” -Terence McKenna

Offline Wismar

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 3838
  • Med Gud o' Sveas allmoge för Konung och Fosterland
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Radical
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #31 on: October 15, 2013, 09:19:20 pm »
I couldn't agree more. Both should be banned.

If you support Communism you wouldn't be able to play NW since private ownership is abolished.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2013, 09:25:33 pm by Oscar XI Hederlööf »

MagicTeatowel

  • Guest
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #32 on: October 15, 2013, 09:27:10 pm »
I couldn't agree more. Both should be banned.

If you support Communism you wouldn't be able to play NW since private ownership is abolished.

haha True  :)

Is Democratic Socialism allowed?

Offline Augy

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 2970
  • Anarchist. Absurdist. Existentialist. Man. Human.
    • View Profile
    • The Royal Recruits
  • Nick: -[TRR]- Cpt. Augy
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #33 on: October 15, 2013, 09:28:31 pm »
I couldn't agree more. Both should be banned.

If you support Communism you wouldn't be able to play NW since private ownership is abolished.

Mount and Musket wasn't.
“Ego is a structure that is erected by a neurotic individual who is a member of a neurotic culture against the facts of the matter. And culture, which we put on like an overcoat, is the collectivized consensus about what sort of neurotic behaviors are acceptable.” -Terence McKenna

Offline Wismar

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 3838
  • Med Gud o' Sveas allmoge för Konung och Fosterland
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Radical
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #34 on: October 15, 2013, 09:30:31 pm »
I couldn't agree more. Both should be banned.

If you support Communism you wouldn't be able to play NW since private ownership is abolished.

haha True  :)

Is Democratic Socialism allowed?
Ofcourse it is, lol...
The majority of the Europeans are Socialdemocratic.

MagicTeatowel

  • Guest
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #35 on: October 15, 2013, 09:34:27 pm »
I couldn't agree more. Both should be banned.

If you support Communism you wouldn't be able to play NW since private ownership is abolished.

haha True  :)

Is Democratic Socialism allowed?
Ofcourse it is, lol...
The majority of the Europeans are Socialdemocratic.

plz don luauf at me . . . .

Some say that communism and socialism are alike . . . ..

But on the note of National Socialism . .

If someone said . . . . .
Quote
The National Socialists had a good road building program to get men back to work

^ Would that warrant a ban?

Offline Desert Thunda

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 5351
  • u wish u knew
    • View Profile
  • Nick: K-KA_Commissar_DesertThunda
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #36 on: October 15, 2013, 09:38:29 pm »
If someone said . . . . .
Quote
The National Socialists had a good road building program to get men back to work

^ Would that warrant a ban?

Ofcourse not since you are discussing an advantage of the ideology.

Offline Wismar

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 3838
  • Med Gud o' Sveas allmoge för Konung och Fosterland
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Radical
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #37 on: October 15, 2013, 09:39:54 pm »
Socialism is a big "tree" of political views.

Whit in it you have Socialdemocracy, Communism, Syndicalism, Anarchism and Nationalsocialism.
These are just a few examples.

MagicTeatowel

  • Guest
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #38 on: October 15, 2013, 09:42:11 pm »
Spoiler
If someone said . . . . .
Quote
The National Socialists had a good road building program to get men back to work

^ Would that warrant a ban?

Ofcourse not since you are discussing an advantage of the ideology.
[close]

thanks desert.

I personally don't see any problem talking about the two as long as people discuss it in a mature manor, e.g. using for historical discussion.

Offline Furrnox

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 7984
  • Eternally incorrect, centre-left, asshole.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #39 on: October 15, 2013, 09:46:20 pm »
Can someone explain to me the difference between Nazism and National Socialism? If I google it the same thing shows up (Nazi Germany). Since I'm pretty convinced there is no difference.

MagicTeatowel

  • Guest
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #40 on: October 15, 2013, 09:47:53 pm »
Can someone explain to me the difference between Nazism and National Socialism? If I google it the same thing shows up (Nazi Germany).

As far as I am aware, The Nazi Party was like the initials in German for "National Socialist Workers Party".

Offline Wismar

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 3838
  • Med Gud o' Sveas allmoge för Konung och Fosterland
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Radical
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #41 on: October 15, 2013, 09:48:59 pm »
Nazism is a shorter version

MagicTeatowel

  • Guest
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #42 on: October 15, 2013, 09:50:23 pm »
Nazism is a shorter version

Makes you sound more intellectual if you say National Socialism  ;)  ::)

Offline Desert Thunda

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 5351
  • u wish u knew
    • View Profile
  • Nick: K-KA_Commissar_DesertThunda
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #43 on: October 15, 2013, 09:51:48 pm »
Nazism is a shorter version

Makes you sound more intellectual if you say National Socialism  ;)  ::)

Because arguments these days on the forums is always won by the man with the best knowledge of the English vocabulary.

Offline Karth

  • Donator
  • ***
  • Posts: 4077
  • General of 63e| NW Official Admin
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 63e_General_Karth
  • Side: Union
Re: Why no National Socialism, but Communism?
« Reply #44 on: October 15, 2013, 09:51:57 pm »
Well I dont see how people can admire/look up to/glorify Hitler or Stalin, so if they did then they should receive necessary punishment...  Its always the end result that matters when you look at history, which is why history teaches us what not to do for the future.