15th can I play for you?
Got recruited in 2014 already
Wursti the thing is about the date you joined the group not the moment you got invited.....
I don't see that in the rules 
Might want to quickly edit that in now before someone notices.
I can understand wanting some evidence that the person joined the regiment within that time period but now it seems that you are deciding that certain 'evidence' is invalid and it has to be a certain format which doesn't make a lot of sense as Steam chats/groups are often not joined at all in some cases let alone on the day they 'join'. I didn't join half the steam chats of regiments I'm in as I cba to see the messages and just get told when there is an event anyway.
I agreed with the decision up until that evidence was posted but now it seems you are clutching at straws tbh.
The proof isn't 'invalid', its just we don't consider it 'proof' in the first place. If more detailed logs (real proof) are sent to us in the future then we will be more than happy to reconsider Padawan.
You just played yourself sir. You have all the power decide what is "real proof" and what isn't, if you wanted you could say anything is fake and deny him further I don't know how im supposed to prove it any further I cant go back to steam chat logs 2 weeks ago properly. I don't have a signed fucking document from MR. Padawan. What I do have is a legitimate member of my regiment who is being denied by inexperienced and frankly biased hosts without any concern to the regiment attending and the competition of the tournament, shameless.
Isn't this supposed to be about stopping double reggers and invites or has this become a Im a host and i do what I want contest, pretty cringe from all three of you. And deeply disappointing from templar.
Poll
