Restore my faith in humanity please BLM

[Hawkince]

you know transgenderism is included in the lbgT?

I don't really understand what you're trying to say in your first part of the message. People who talk about Peterson's views watch him the most? I'm pretty sure his followers watch him the most.

Don't say what I'm saying is ironic when you don't even know how much I watch Peterson's videos. The irony is you parroting his arguments, while complaining about mainstream "brainwashing"

https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/913533213301182465

this y'alls intellectual? yikes

[Janne]

you know transgenderism is included in the lbgT?

I don't really understand what you're trying to say in your first part of the message. People who talk about Peterson's views watch him the most? I'm pretty sure his followers watch him the most.

Don't say what I'm saying is ironic when you don't even know how much I watch Peterson's videos. The irony is you parroting his arguments, while complaining about mainstream "brainwashing"

https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/913533213301182465

this y'alls intellectual? yikes

looooooooooooooooooool

"he's just asking questions" xdd

[Hawkince]

Jordan Peterson is a "philosopher" for white incels who think white genocide is a thing while perpetrating "race science" and hating on women

[DayBoul]

you know transgenderism is included in the lbgT?

I don't really understand what you're trying to say in your first part of the message. People who talk about Peterson's views watch him the most? I'm pretty sure his followers watch him the most.

Don't say what I'm saying is ironic when you don't even know how much I watch Peterson's videos. The irony is you parroting his arguments, while complaining about mainstream "brainwashing"

so you dont watch peterson's videos but still you're that knowledgeable about his arguments that you know when someone is parroting them? mate you're contradicting yourself 24/7 its embarassing lmao

person 1 : says something about LGBT issues
person 2 : instantly labels that person as either pro-peterson or anti-peterson depending on what the person said while it has very little to nothing to do with the discussion
who is the more likely to be watching peterson videos? you can do it

Jordan Peterson is a "philosopher" for white incels who think white genocide is a thing while perpetrating "race science" and hating on women

the first part is true but define "white genocide?"

[saf]

lgbt ppl are a bunch of *snip*

[DayBoul]

lgbt ppl are a bunch of *snip*

god damn true asfuck saf u tell em

[Janne]

you know transgenderism is included in the lbgT?

I don't really understand what you're trying to say in your first part of the message. People who talk about Peterson's views watch him the most? I'm pretty sure his followers watch him the most.

Don't say what I'm saying is ironic when you don't even know how much I watch Peterson's videos. The irony is you parroting his arguments, while complaining about mainstream "brainwashing"

so you dont watch peterson's videos but still you're that knowledgeable about his arguments that you know when someone is parroting them? mate you're contradicting yourself 24/7 its embarassing lmao

person 1 : says something about LGBT issues
person 2 : instantly labels that person as either pro-peterson or anti-peterson depending on what the person said while it has very little to nothing to do with the discussion
who is the more likely to be watching peterson videos? you can do it

Jordan Peterson is a "philosopher" for white incels who think white genocide is a thing while perpetrating "race science" and hating on women

the first part is true but define "white genocide?"

I never said I haven't watched Petersons videos.

I'm not even sure what you're trying to prove with your hypothetical. That i watch more Peterson? I've seen enough of his shit that I can tell when someone is pretty clearly parroting their arguments.

[Kore]

How can him, or me, as I pretty much agree with most of what dayboul said, parrot ideas of someone I have never watched nor cared about?

[Janne]

How can him, or me, as I pretty much agree with most of what dayboul said, parrot ideas of someone I have never watched nor cared about?

did anybody ever mention you?

[Kore]

How can him, or me, as I pretty much agree with most of what dayboul said, parrot ideas of someone I have never watched nor cared about?

did anybody ever mention you?

You'd say the same to me if I shared my opinions first lmao. I'm legit just asking so can you please answer instead of being the tRoLl you like to be?

[Janne]

How can him, or me, as I pretty much agree with most of what dayboul said, parrot ideas of someone I have never watched nor cared about?

did anybody ever mention you?

You'd say the same to me if I shared my opinions first lmao. I'm legit just asking so can you please answer instead of being the tRoLl you like to be?

The arguments dayboul is making have been popularized by Peterson. It's a pretty safe assumption to make that he's watched some of his content and is now parroting what he's heard from him.

I doubt you'd be typing the exact same arguments Peterson has made without being familiar with his arguments. What dayboul has been writing just reeks of Peterson and he's not even denying it.

[DayBoul]

guys peterson has complete monopoly over all arguments that ever existed regarding this subject and he can sue you for using them, fucking deal with it yall

How can him, or me, as I pretty much agree with most of what dayboul said, parrot ideas of someone I have never watched nor cared about?

did anybody ever mention you?

same can be said about u, you're out there roaming fse threads all day eveeryday to post 2229 posts no one asked for only to give your unsolicited opinion you might aswell shut the fuck up, idk why you'd ever assume ppl want to hear what can possibly come out of your ugric cave dwelling untermensch brain

[Kore]

How can him, or me, as I pretty much agree with most of what dayboul said, parrot ideas of someone I have never watched nor cared about?

did anybody ever mention you?

You'd say the same to me if I shared my opinions first lmao. I'm legit just asking so can you please answer instead of being the tRoLl you like to be?

The arguments dayboul is making have been popularized by Peterson. It's a pretty safe assumption to make that he's watched some of his content and is now parroting what he's heard from him.

I doubt you'd be typing the exact same arguments Peterson has made without being familiar with his arguments. What dayboul has been writing just reeks of Peterson and he's not even denying it.

Fair enough, though I'm sure I'd use very similar arguments, as I verily disagree with having someone to force me to call a biological woman a man or vice versa.
I do realise the world isn't black and white and that this might be an extreme but at the same time I believe all this violence against black people is an extreme overblown by media as well.

[DayBoul]

nordic countries have a long lasting tradition of being germany's bitch, i thought you'd understand better in german:)

guys peterson has complete monopoly over all arguments that ever existed regarding this subject and he can sue you for using them, fucking deal with it yall

you're again just putting words in my mouth. it's pretty clear that you're unable to handle a conversation. you just try to own and get epic gotchas.

what, using someone else's perfectly valid point makes it automatically incorrect? i've just made a point and you keep whining about how it resembles one that some other dudes made. Not only did i never appropriate myself the argument - not that its only his to use anyway - but it doesnt invalidate it either.
so far your only point u kept repeating is "its peterson's argument" which isnt even correct, and even if it were i dont see the problem in that

same can be said about u, you're out there roaming fse threads all day eveeryday to post 2229 posts no one asked for only to give your unsolicited opinion you might aswell shut the fuck up, idk why you'd ever assume ppl want to hear what can possibly come out of your ugric cave dwelling untermensch brain

completely missed the point of my question. i asked if anybody ever mentioned him, because he assumed that what i said about you would also necessarily apply to him.

also good job showing your true colours nazi boy

which you said right after he literally stated that he agreed with me so it was gonna apply to him anyway?

[Janne]

guys peterson has complete monopoly over all arguments that ever existed regarding this subject and he can sue you for using them, fucking deal with it yall

you're again just putting words in my mouth. it's pretty clear that you're unable to handle a conversation. you just try to own and get epic gotchas.

what, using someone else's perfectly valid point makes it automatically incorrect? i've just made a point and you keep whining about how it resembles one that some other dudes made. Not only did i never appropriate myself the argument - not that its only his to use anyway - but it doesnt invalidate it either.
so far your only point u kept repeating is "its peterson's argument" which isnt even correct, and even if it were i dont see the problem in that

I've never even said that "your" arguments were incorrect or correct. so far I've only said that "It's funny that you're complaining about mainstream media brainwashing while parroting Peterson's arguments".

which you said right after he literally stated that he agreed with me so it was gonna apply to him anyway?

I haven't directly challenged any of your arguments so no.

nordic countries have a long lasting tradition of being germany's bitch, i thought you'd understand better in german:)

something something battle of france, nice one bro.