Seeing that Stockholm has doubled down on his claims that the 45thN over 30 broke rules ranging from FiCs, OAs and Rambos this is a post just to clarify the situation as it isn't as one sided as reviewed. Ultimately its up to the refs own discretion of what he should add to his post match review, and I thank Stockholm for reffing and going into depth with his review, no matter how facetious it was.
My understanding of RoL Rules
To clarify my understanding as they aren't explicitly told in the rules, Reloads may be finished off as the line is moving as long as the gaps between the reloader and the line is no more than 2-3 man spacing as done in NWL and EIC. For Example - the command 'move around reloaders' would not constitute an RoL as long as the reloaders rejoin the line with at the latest 2/3 man spacing at the back. This is probably what caused alot of confusion as our understanding may differ but feel free to correct me
45thN Centre Company and Grenadier POV
Down below are the 45thN Rule Breaks as shown in the video
Unintentional OA in 2nd Round
First Unintentional RoL after being told to break in 5th Round
1 questionable rev for supposed FIC in round 5
Line wasn't broken though tbf it was close[/img]
Timlef throws a bottle at Desant and gets slayed
Misunderstanding which lead to RoL
1 Criminal FiC from one of our HoldFast recruits
Nice Kick Janne xd
The Final Round being a meme melee all charge where there some memey FiCs from both sides, so if you want to count it up to your
30 supposed game changing rule breaks then by all means count them in, but that number moves no where past ten. The 45thN let our NCOs lead past round 5 for experience so for us and for the 96y/71st coalition the light hearted match was practically over.
The 45thN won every round decisively being at least up 10 in all the rounds we won sometimes being up 20, these rule breaks although minor shouldn't allow any rounds to be reconsidered voided and replayed by any means. However the cleaner a match up is - the better and we will try to avoid the rule breaks as much as possible. As seen in the recording none of these (other than timlefs memes bottle throw) were done maliciously or on purpose and these handful of rule breaks and mistakes shouldn't constitute the regiment to be publicly deemed of
not worthy of being a potential tournament winner. with the match being called the
worst match you've ever reffed. It is a bit cringe that you're doubling down on your claims about the over 30 rule breaks when you only give us one official warning in admin chat about the RoLs. Despite some good refereeing, its a shame that you have attempted to have a dig at the 45thN over this 2v2, I am sure we would've managed to have maybe have five unintentional rule breaks if you maybe warned and explicitly told both lines in Admin chat what was going on rather than shit talking me to Nova in internal
GG WP to the 71st/96y, again apologies for the longish post
