Hail Merkel
Hail Merkel
Fuck Merkel
Thanks for fixing it, its better nowFuck Merkel
I've applied for ISIS. Wish me luck.
Spoiler(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.strangepolitics.com%2Fimages%2Fcontent%2F156060.jpg&hash=046d18bf21d3ae1df6d4a24e2811727ce7ea88c0)[close]
You're right but... to much work to re-locate.I don't think that an Islamic country relocating to a predominately Christian/Non-religious area would bode well for either side.
But we can re-locate Saudi Arabia into Europe, renovate everything so it's nice, and then dem oilz.
Russia is in it to help Assad, the west is in it to help the opposition. However, we don't actually bomb Assad.
At the same time, 85% of all civilian casualties are caused by Assad, so the claim that Assad is better then IS doesn't really have merit. Sure, a mass-murderer killing thousands each month is better then a religious nut killing hundreds each month, amirite people?
The US killed as many innocent people than Assad in only a few seconds in 1945.
Also, I feel sorry for US-backed moderate terrorists.
Russia is in it to help Assad, the west is in it to help the opposition. However, we don't actually bomb Assad.
At the same time, 85% of all civilian casualties are caused by Assad, so the claim that Assad is better then IS doesn't really have merit. Sure, a mass-murderer killing thousands each month is better then a religious nut killing hundreds each month, amirite people?
Very interesting post.
I wish you would share more sources of information so we could better understand the process of allocating death responsibility.
I have noo doubt the regime has killed plenty of civilians whether targeted or accidental but its always nice to know what constitutes said civilians.
The Iran is a pretty alright country in the area. No need to bomb that one
nothing if you like your lifeThe Iran is a pretty alright country in the area. No need to bomb that one
what are we supposed to do with nukes then eh?
The Iran is a pretty alright country in the area. No need to bomb that one
what are we supposed to do with nukes then eh?
You're right but... to much work to re-locate.
But we can re-locate Saudi Arabia into Europe, renovate everything so it's nice, and then dem oilz.
Spoiler(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.strangepolitics.com%2Fimages%2Fcontent%2F156060.jpg&hash=046d18bf21d3ae1df6d4a24e2811727ce7ea88c0)[close]
Spoiler(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.strangepolitics.com%2Fimages%2Fcontent%2F156060.jpg&hash=046d18bf21d3ae1df6d4a24e2811727ce7ea88c0)[close]
Not sure why your map still has Israel on it
You're right but... to much work to re-locate.I don't think that an Islamic country relocating to a predominately Christian/Non-religious area would bode well for either side.
But we can re-locate Saudi Arabia into Europe, renovate everything so it's nice, and then dem oilz.
On these forums, the people of the left know more about the right then then those leaning right who also know very little of the left.
Building tangentially off of that, I really don't understand the 'uproar' when Corbyn said he wouldn't use nuclear weapons. Surely it's common sense? Britain's enemies (ones which may actually use violence against us) are only really terrorist groups, not nations. You can't nuke a terrorist group without also nuking a nation. Even if some nation did declare war on the UK, nuking them would achieve nothing, short of MAD (and possibly a nuclear winter). If they're a large nuclear armed nation, both would get obliterated, and if they're a small, non-nuclear nation, it wouldn't be possible anyway from sheer fallout. Plenty of nations get by just fine without nuclear capabilities, mainly because they don't go around interfering with other nations and making enemies.nothing if you like your lifeThe Iran is a pretty alright country in the area. No need to bomb that one
what are we supposed to do with nukes then eh?
You must be MAD to declare war to a nation that has plenty of nuclear weapons... that's the point of having nuclear weapons. Now even if there was such a mad nation, you wouldn't need to wipe it with your nukes. You would use tactical nuclear weapons before using the big ones.Nah, just straight to nuclear winter. fuck the world
Building tangentially off of that, I really don't understand the 'uproar' when Corbyn said he wouldn't use nuclear weapons. Surely it's common sense? Britain's enemies (ones which may actually use violence against us) are only really terrorist groups, not nations. You can't nuke a terrorist group without also nuking a nation. Even if some nation did declare war on the UK, nuking them would achieve nothing, short of MAD (and possibly a nuclear winter). If they're a large nuclear armed nation, both would get obliterated, and if they're a small, non-nuclear nation, it wouldn't be possible anyway from sheer fallout. Plenty of nations get by just fine without nuclear capabilities, mainly because they don't go around interfering with other nations and making enemies.nothing if you like your lifeThe Iran is a pretty alright country in the area. No need to bomb that one
what are we supposed to do with nukes then eh?
War is coming.
“I want to thank well-meaning non-Muslims who, in the wake of these attacks, have emphasised that they have been carried out by a small, twisted minority. A terrorist’s goal is to sow hatred and discord, and by not giving in, you are defeating their plans.
But I want to say that as a Muslim, I wish that we weren’t so quick to emphasise that this has nothing to do with us. While I personally have never killed anyone and none of my friends and family have ever resorted to violence, radicalism has everything to do with Islam. And the failure to address that out of a well-intentioned commitment to tolerance is making the problem worse.
ISIS is a Muslim organisation, and it is an Islamic problem. Let me say it again to be perfectly clear. ISIS is a Muslim organisation, and they are a cancer at the heart of Islam. And the problem will not go away until Muslims confront that.
ISIS attackers scream ‘Allah hu’akbar’ during their attacks.
ISIS recruits cite Qur’anic verses as justification for the rape and enslavement of women.
ISIS soldiers kill archaeologists, gay men and women, and people who refuse to convert to Islam because they are blasphemers.
There are no Christians in ISIS. There are no Buddhists, Jews, Pagans, Taoists, Houngans, Catholics, Wiccans, Hindus or even Scientologists in ISIS. ISIS is a Muslim organisation and they kill in the name of Islam.
So don’t say that ISIS aren’t ‘true Muslims’ or that they are ‘not really Muslims’. Like any large organisation, ISIS exists in a spectrum.
You have the aimless, restless teenager who never amounted to anything in his life and traveled to Syria because he can’t find a job and doesn’t know if the Qur’an is to be read from left to right or right to left. But you also have pious professionals, businessmen, and academics who read their Qur’an cover to cover, pray every day, were seduced into radicalism, and truly believe that the Islamic State’s goal of conquest is a noble one. The so-called ‘Caliph’ Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi has a doctorate in Islamic studies.
So if you feel that Muslims are being oppressed or killed in Muslim countries, I expect you to also be just as outraged by ISIS. Because they have killed more Muslims in Iraq, Syria and Jordan than the entire US army.
They have done more damage to the name and reputation of Islam than any Western nation. ISIS is Islam’s biggest enemy, not the US, not Israel or France or Germany or the Russians.
We have to own the problem. We have to admit that this is a religious problem, and we need to renew our commitment to a secular country which treats all religions equally. I have believed in the importance of secularism all my life, and with every day that passes that belief grows stronger. Religion is no way to govern a nation. Not any religion, and not any nation.
ISIS is not America’s problem, nor the British, nor the French. ISIS is not Syria or Iraq’s problem. ISIS is a problem for Muslims. And if you can’t admit that, you’re not really a good Muslim either.”
Can this retarded lie stop? US or "the West" did not create ISIS.Seeing this I decided to change my vote and voted ISIS instead of "and".
Can this retarded lie stop? US or "the West" did not create ISIS.I'm pretty sure we did. Nothing like going in, removing the Tyrannical leader that was able to suppress the extremists, then inserting a weak puppet government, rearming their military, and then leaving it to sectarian conflict.
Can this retarded lie stop? US or "the West" did not create ISIS.
You need to stop projecting.Can this retarded lie stop? US or "the West" did not create ISIS.
Your definition of a lie is anything that contradicts your sheltered worldview.
If US didn't remove Saddam, what do you think would have happened to the Kurds, or Kuwait? Its not like USA invaded for no reason.Can this retarded lie stop? US or "the West" did not create ISIS.I'm pretty sure we did. Nothing like going in, removing the Tyrannical leader that was able to suppress the extremists, then inserting a weak puppet government, rearming their military, and then leaving it to sectarian conflict.
Its not like USA invaded for no reason.
Yes, they've read your internet messages and they're coming to get you. Make sure to scream "MUZZIES OUT REEEEEEEEEE" at the top of your lungs when you see them.ok I'm gonna go get them before they can get me!thanks for the advice
So recently I found out that ISIS has targeted a city like 10 minutes away from me. Now a group of Muslims just moved in across the street from me. Should I be worried? :-[
This is shaping up to be a massive proxy war for a ton of nations.
Isn't that strange to have a NATO signature when one of the member countries, Turkey, is apparently helping ISIS?lel, no. It's just annoying, the same thing like #prayforparis
Isn't that strange to have a NATO signature when one of the member countries, Turkey, is apparently helping ISIS?lel, no. It's just annoying, the same thing like #prayforparis
yes, we know :/Isn't that strange to have a NATO signature when one of the member countries, Turkey, is apparently helping ISIS?lel, no. It's just annoying, the same thing like #prayforparis
You know what also is annoying? Your existence.
#SaltyAsFuck
That's so funny and ironic because Germany and NATO as a whole is doing nothing against ISIS, and Turkey is buying oil from them while you post shit about Russia for bombing terrorist groups in Syria. What have Luftwaffe done the last 20 years?Spoiler(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.web.de%2Fimage%2F096%2F31169096%2Cpd%3D4%2Cf%3Dsize-xxl.jpg&hash=e6271de8de5b613a4192e38269cd839df6273d4c)[close]
#rekISIS
That's so funny and ironic because Germany and NATO as a whole is doing nothing against ISIS, and Turkey is buying oil from them while you post shit about Russia for bombing terrorist groups in Syria. What have Luftwaffe done the last 20 years?Spoiler(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.web.de%2Fimage%2F096%2F31169096%2Cpd%3D4%2Cf%3Dsize-xxl.jpg&hash=e6271de8de5b613a4192e38269cd839df6273d4c)[close]
#rekISIS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Air_Force#2010s
NATO is lame+1
NATO is lame
A Turkish prosecutor has asked for the arrest of senior commanders in a case involving Syria-bound trucks sent by Turkey’s National Intelligence Agency (MİT) and as part of an investigation into the alleged creation of a fake terrorist group called Selam Tevhid, in which U.S.-based Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen is a suspect along with 121 others.http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-prosecutor-seeks-arrest-of-senior-commanders-in-case-of-intel-trucks-to-syria-.aspx?pageID=238&nID=91830&NewsCatID=341
Istanbul Deputy Chief Prosecutor İrfan Fidan interrogated Ankara Gendarmerie Regional Commander Maj. Gen. İbrahim Aydın, Brig. Gen. Hamza Celepoğlu and Ret. Col. Burhanettin Cihangiroğlu on Nov. 28 and sent them to court appealing for their arrest on Nov. 29.
The subject of the MİT’s purported arms deliveries to Syria has been high on the country’s agenda in the wake of Turkey’s downing of a Russian jet on Nov. 24, and the arrest of two prominent journalists, daily Cumhuriyet Editor-in-Chief Can Dündar and Ankara Bureau Chief Erdem Gül, on Nov. 26 on charges of collecting and revealing secret documents for espionage and supporting (though not being a member of) an armed terrorist organization. The accusations against Dündar and Gül were based on reports in Cumhuriyet regarding the Syria-bound MİT trucks.
“By stopping MİT trucks and checking what was inside, they announced it to the world through espionage. What did they say then? They said, ‘These [trucks] are providing weapons for a terrorist organization.’ They exposed the humanitarian assistance which was sent to Bayırbucak Turkmens in this way. They exposed what was sent to the Free Syrian Army [FSA] in this way,” President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said on Nov. 28.
In January 2014, trucks belonging to the MİT were stopped by a prosecutor who sought to have the gendarmerie search the vehicles in the southern province of Adana before they crossed into Syria. Claiming that the trucks were carrying “humanitarian aid to Turkmens” in the war-torn country, the Turkish government accused followers of Gülen in the judiciary and security institutions of illegally ordering the search.
In February 2014, a ban was imposed on the publication of reports about the search, and in April 2015 a Turkish court arrested 17 active soldiers who stopped the trucks.
There has long been speculation that the aid was actually being sent to jihadists in Syria.
Sorry, wrong threadHOLY FUCKING SHIT QUIT RUINING FSE YOU ARE SO AUTISTIC OMG YOU COME IN HERE AND RUIN ALL THE GOOD CONVERSATION AND THREADS WITH YOUR OFF TOPIC BULLSHIT