Over The Top: WWI Steam Store PageNew Game announced! Add Over the Top: WWI to your Steam Wishlist!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Waste-Too-Cool on January 24, 2017, 02:23:21 amQuote from: Nappy Surena on January 24, 2017, 02:19:20 amQuote from: Waste-Too-Cool on January 24, 2017, 02:08:57 amQuote from: Nappy Surena on January 24, 2017, 02:05:52 am32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11This isn't NANWL, this league is focused on smaller regiments. There is no rule saying that you act as if you have 10 if you have less.12. At the beginning of the round, the difference in numbers may only be ONE man.Top kek Great ModQuote from: amiranger on January 24, 2017, 02:11:06 amI dont see a rule that requires a minimum of 10. We left because Surena made us do a 6v11.there has always been a 10 minimum rule, no matter what league it has been but a regiment that brings 20-25 shouldn't have to drop to 6-7 because of a regiment that has bad attendance and they have to drop 70% of their fucking lineYeah...no. This league was made to get smaller regiments into competitive NW, stop trying to cover your ass because you fucked up and didn't know the rulesThere hasn't been one regiment in this league that has brought less than 10 in a match
Quote from: Nappy Surena on January 24, 2017, 02:19:20 amQuote from: Waste-Too-Cool on January 24, 2017, 02:08:57 amQuote from: Nappy Surena on January 24, 2017, 02:05:52 am32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11This isn't NANWL, this league is focused on smaller regiments. There is no rule saying that you act as if you have 10 if you have less.12. At the beginning of the round, the difference in numbers may only be ONE man.Top kek Great ModQuote from: amiranger on January 24, 2017, 02:11:06 amI dont see a rule that requires a minimum of 10. We left because Surena made us do a 6v11.there has always been a 10 minimum rule, no matter what league it has been but a regiment that brings 20-25 shouldn't have to drop to 6-7 because of a regiment that has bad attendance and they have to drop 70% of their fucking lineYeah...no. This league was made to get smaller regiments into competitive NW, stop trying to cover your ass because you fucked up and didn't know the rules
Quote from: Waste-Too-Cool on January 24, 2017, 02:08:57 amQuote from: Nappy Surena on January 24, 2017, 02:05:52 am32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11This isn't NANWL, this league is focused on smaller regiments. There is no rule saying that you act as if you have 10 if you have less.12. At the beginning of the round, the difference in numbers may only be ONE man.Top kek Great ModQuote from: amiranger on January 24, 2017, 02:11:06 amI dont see a rule that requires a minimum of 10. We left because Surena made us do a 6v11.there has always been a 10 minimum rule, no matter what league it has been but a regiment that brings 20-25 shouldn't have to drop to 6-7 because of a regiment that has bad attendance and they have to drop 70% of their fucking line
Quote from: Nappy Surena on January 24, 2017, 02:05:52 am32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11This isn't NANWL, this league is focused on smaller regiments. There is no rule saying that you act as if you have 10 if you have less.12. At the beginning of the round, the difference in numbers may only be ONE man.Top kek Great Mod
32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11
I dont see a rule that requires a minimum of 10. We left because Surena made us do a 6v11.
When BabyJesus asked us to join this new league, the first thing I asked him was if there was a minimum of 10 like NANWL and TNWL because half of TNWL we could barely reach 10. And he said no, there wasn't. That this was focused on smaller newer regiments. I understand that top badass tier 1 regiments joined the league since but that doesn't make this league just as competitive as NWL. We can still have fun decent 1v1s. We even had some 1v1s below 10 and everyone was fine with it.I'm filing a complaint on Nappy for not knowing the rules and acting immature during the linebattle despite being a moderator.The refs are literally killing this fun league. I offer a rematch for 32e.
Quote from: No This is Patrick on January 24, 2017, 02:34:21 amWhen BabyJesus asked us to join this new league, the first thing I asked him was if there was a minimum of 10 like NANWL and TNWL because half of TNWL we could barely reach 10. And he said no, there wasn't. That this was focused on smaller newer regiments. I understand that top badass tier 1 regiments joined the league since but that doesn't make this league just as competitive as NWL. We can still have fun decent 1v1s. We even had some 1v1s below 10 and everyone was fine with it.I'm filing a complaint on Nappy for not knowing the rules and acting immature during the linebattle despite being a moderator.The refs are literally killing this fun league. I offer a rematch for 32e.This league isn't under babyj anymore remember.
NAPL season 1 saw the greatest regiment winning
Quote from: No This is Patrick on January 24, 2017, 02:34:21 amWhen BabyJesus asked us to join this new league, the first thing I asked him was if there was a minimum of 10 like NANWL and TNWL because half of TNWL we could barely reach 10. And he said no, there wasn't. That this was focused on smaller newer regiments. I understand that top badass tier 1 regiments joined the league since but that doesn't make this league just as competitive as NWL. We can still have fun decent 1v1s. We even had some 1v1s below 10 and everyone was fine with it.I'm filing a complaint on Nappy for not knowing the rules and acting immature during the linebattle despite being a moderator.The refs are literally killing this fun league. I offer a rematch for 32e. I agree they should have a rematch since their are no rules about it
we shouldnt have to drop 15 people to fucking 7v6 some regiment. whats stopping us from bringing one player and making you duel him?
Quote from: Vortecks on January 24, 2017, 04:46:44 amwe shouldnt have to drop 15 people to fucking 7v6 some regiment. whats stopping us from bringing one player and making you duel him? The part where Dan said he was going to add a rule saying that you can't purposefully drop people *looks at 32e*
Quote from: Waste-Too-Cool on January 24, 2017, 04:52:51 amQuote from: Vortecks on January 24, 2017, 04:46:44 amwe shouldnt have to drop 15 people to fucking 7v6 some regiment. whats stopping us from bringing one player and making you duel him? The part where Dan said he was going to add a rule saying that you can't purposefully drop people *looks at 32e*so we are forced to coinflip with a regiment worse than us because they have shit numbers, nice meme.
Quote from: Vortecks on January 24, 2017, 04:54:55 amQuote from: Waste-Too-Cool on January 24, 2017, 04:52:51 amQuote from: Vortecks on January 24, 2017, 04:46:44 amwe shouldnt have to drop 15 people to fucking 7v6 some regiment. whats stopping us from bringing one player and making you duel him? The part where Dan said he was going to add a rule saying that you can't purposefully drop people *looks at 32e*so we are forced to coinflip with a regiment worse than us because they have shit numbers, nice meme.You knew the rules when you signed up