North American Premier League(Match day 7)

[Nevino]

Lady Morraine worst ref.

[Theodin]

hi guys

[RussianFury]

hi guys

hi

[Nappy Surena]

32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11

[Vortecks]

32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11

was a good 1v1 thank you everyone for coming

[Wastee]

32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11

This isn't NANWL, this league is focused on smaller regiments. There is no rule saying that you act as if you have 10 if you have less.

12. At the beginning of the round, the difference in numbers may only be ONE man.

Top kek Great Mod

[RussianFury]

32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11

This isn't NANWL, this league is focused on smaller regiments. There is no rule saying that you act as if you have 10 if you have less.

12. At the beginning of the round, the difference in numbers may only be ONE man.

Top kek

controversy D00D

[amiranger]

I dont see a rule that requires a minimum of 10. We left because Surena made us do a 6v11.

[Nappy Surena]

32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11

This isn't NANWL, this league is focused on smaller regiments. There is no rule saying that you act as if you have 10 if you have less.

12. At the beginning of the round, the difference in numbers may only be ONE man.

Top kek Great Mod

I dont see a rule that requires a minimum of 10. We left because Surena made us do a 6v11.

there has always been a 10 minimum rule, no matter what league it has been but a regiment that brings 20-25 shouldn't have to drop to 6-7 because of a regiment that has bad attendance and they have to drop 70% of their fucking line

[Wastee]

32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11

This isn't NANWL, this league is focused on smaller regiments. There is no rule saying that you act as if you have 10 if you have less.

12. At the beginning of the round, the difference in numbers may only be ONE man.

Top kek Great Mod

I dont see a rule that requires a minimum of 10. We left because Surena made us do a 6v11.

there has always been a 10 minimum rule, no matter what league it has been but a regiment that brings 20-25 shouldn't have to drop to 6-7 because of a regiment that has bad attendance and they have to drop 70% of their fucking line

Yeah...no. This league was made to get smaller regiments into competitive NW, stop trying to cover your ass because you fucked up and didn't know the rules

[~NickCole~]

This league lost its purpose when tier 1 regiments got in.

yeh that idea went out the window a long time ago lol

[Nappy Surena]

32e 10-0 Sil, Sil didn't show up with the minimum of 10 and complained that I allowed 32e to have 11

This isn't NANWL, this league is focused on smaller regiments. There is no rule saying that you act as if you have 10 if you have less.

12. At the beginning of the round, the difference in numbers may only be ONE man.

Top kek Great Mod

I dont see a rule that requires a minimum of 10. We left because Surena made us do a 6v11.

there has always been a 10 minimum rule, no matter what league it has been but a regiment that brings 20-25 shouldn't have to drop to 6-7 because of a regiment that has bad attendance and they have to drop 70% of their fucking line

Yeah...no. This league was made to get smaller regiments into competitive NW, stop trying to cover your ass because you fucked up and didn't know the rules

There hasn't been one regiment in this league that has brought less than 10 in a match

[Theodin]

Just because it's common practice to act like everyone has minimum 10 doesn't mean that it's legal to allow the other regiment to have 11. That's not how rules work. That's also not how laws work.

[Orcaryo]

Orcaryo's Two Cents
By Orcaryo <3

There's no rule against them having less than 10 people. As dumb as it sounds, it should have been a 6 v. 7. In the future, maybe it would be worth for the regiments to simply ask each other how much they plan on bringing. That would avoid the whole situation where 30+ people come for a 1v1, and only 20 get to play.

I h8 Waste

[No This is Patrick]

When BabyJesus asked us to join this new league, the first thing I asked him was if there was a minimum of 10 like NANWL and TNWL because half of TNWL we could barely reach 10. And he said no, there wasn't. That this was focused on smaller newer regiments. I understand that top badass tier 1 regiments joined the league since but that doesn't make this league just as competitive as NWL. We can still have fun decent 1v1s. We even had some 1v1s below 10 and everyone was fine with it.

I'm filing a complaint on Nappy for not knowing the rules and acting immature during the linebattle despite being a moderator.

The refs are literally killing this fun league. I offer a rematch for 32e.