« previous next »
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15

Author Topic: A concern on Rifle accuracy changing game play  (Read 30332 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline regwilliam

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 1040
  • add regwilliam to join 1stNJ
    • View Profile
  • Nick: William
  • Side: Union
Re: A concern on Rifle accuracy changing game play
« Reply #210 on: August 30, 2014, 10:31:39 pm »
Plus with better means of recruiting it should mean bigger regiment which can take more punishment. Just imagine 250 v 250 in long battle lines firing volleys into each other  8)
Logged

Offline ClearlyInvsible

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 6492
  • I'm still here. Dunno why.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: ClearlyInvsible
  • Side: Union
Re: A concern on Rifle accuracy changing game play
« Reply #211 on: August 30, 2014, 10:35:13 pm »
My God, I wonder if we'll ever be able to actually do a 250 vs 250 large line battle. We did a few 100 vs 100 ones in the Union Army LBs, and those were amazing.
Logged
"No man will make a great leader who wants to do it all himself or get all the credit for doing it."- Andrew Carnegie
“A man who has no conscience, no goodness, does not suffer.” - Khaled Hosseini
Quote from: Duuring on June 29, 2015, 05:02:40 pm
Faggots will burn in hell anyway, who cares.

Offline KL4R1N0G4MPR0S

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 2994
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: A concern on Rifle accuracy changing game play
« Reply #212 on: August 31, 2014, 01:40:52 am »
Quote from: ClearlyInvsible on August 30, 2014, 10:35:13 pm
My God, I wonder if we'll ever be able to actually do a 250 vs 250 large line battle. We did a few 100 vs 100 ones in the Union Army LBs, and those were amazing.
Stupendous, groundshaking, immense, lag. With a Capital L. :P hehe

On a serious note, isn't the 666e considered by some to be a troll regiment? Just curious.
Logged
<3
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15
« previous next »