Just a minor thing...
Starting next turn any army or force that doesn't have a named leader will suffer a -3 penalty in combat. Please guys, it makes it 10x easier for me if you simply attach a name to an army, or even if a force is separating from the main army, if it's sizeable give it a leader. Even if he's -1 or just some average general who was not noteworthy in the war. When I attach names to armies GM wise it makes is infinitely easier for me to go "Kutuzov's Army attacks Davout's Army, great I know the sizes and make ups of those armies let's battle" instead of "Uh... 4th Prussian Corps, not army, vs... 12th French Division? No that's in Romania rn, which one's the one in Portugal atm? Is that the one with 2k or 40k?"
Also reread plans before you send them, I notice sometimes people put the wrong/same names. "Corps X attacks Paris while Corps X defends Marseille" etc. I usually catch it and ask for clarification if it's truly confusing, most of the time though I can figure out what you meant by comparing old movements and where forces are on my map, but still.
Please.
