North American Napoleonic Wars League [Season 6]

[Wastee]

Couldn't they just use someone else's name

[DomDowg]

Community Name: DomDowg or DomDowg Gaming (Youtube)
Steam Profile (link):https://steamcommunity.com/id/DomDowg
Regiment: None (British Grenadiers EU so probably dont count and 92nd BYMS but will not attend because are to small).
Why do you want to be a referee? Becuase I would like to see the NWL fights I here they are grand.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I have played around 800 hours of Mount&Blade Warband and Napoleonic Wars along with many different mods for Native and NW.
Admin Experience: MOV Events, Dixieland Army Events (Both As Assistant Admins), Iron Europe 2ndWG Events, Blood&Iron_Official, DA 1stUS Events on Wednesdays(All 3 as Head Admin).
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes I am rooting for no one and I am here to make sure everyone has great time. I would also like to record and promote these events and no bias will be shown on that accord.

[Windflower]

Nathan you're wrong by the way, NANWL has never not allowed the usage of historical names in the past, take the 92nd for example who used historical names and participated in NANWL.

Historical names aren't a really a bother and there's no point in banning them. If a regiment uses historical names they will give their roster to the NANWL staff with the historical names that they use ingame. Just because you can't tell who to "ghost" doesn't mean historical names should be banned.

[ColonelMuska]

Regiment: 45eme Regiment d'Infanterie de Ligne
Estimated attendance: 12-18
Leader's Steam: 1st (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198035654499), 2nd (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198088761327), 3rd (https://steamcommunity.com/id/titanicjackdawson)
Accept rules?: Yep

[PapaBean]

Regiment: 45eme Regiment d'Infanterie de Ligne
Estimated attendance: 12-18
Leader's Steam: 1st (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198035654499), 2nd (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198088761327), 3rd (https://steamcommunity.com/id/titanicjackdawson)
Accept rules?: Yep

ACCEPTED

On a side note, I truly don't find historic names a concern if a regiment wants to use them thats fine, HOWEVER that means on the roster the regiment leader will need to put in brackets or something, the persons steam name or a link so that we can verify who they are.  I think this is a completely agreeable solution. However the mods will talk it over and come back to you guys with a decision reached.

[nathan6254]

Nathan you're wrong by the way, NANWL has never not allowed the usage of historical names in the past, take the 92nd for example who used historical names and participated in NANWL.

Historical names aren't a really a bother and there's no point in banning them. If a regiment uses historical names they will give their roster to the NANWL staff with the historical names that they use ingame. Just because you can't tell who to "ghost" doesn't mean historical names should be banned.

Oh, last season the 91st couldn't use historical names so I thought it was against the rules. My apologies.

[AP0CALYPS3]

As long as the historical names are clearly attached to players on the roster, it should not be an issue.

Not saying that I like them, but it definitely shouldnt be against the rules.

[Lawbringer]

Nathan you're wrong by the way, NANWL has never not allowed the usage of historical names in the past, take the 92nd for example who used historical names and participated in NANWL.

Historical names aren't a really a bother and there's no point in banning them. If a regiment uses historical names they will give their roster to the NANWL staff with the historical names that they use ingame. Just because you can't tell who to "ghost" doesn't mean historical names should be banned.

Oh, last season the 91st couldn't use historical names so I thought it was against the rules. My apologies.

Actually we were allowed to use them against the 79th but a certain reg threw a little fit one match so we didn't use them one match to humor them and the ref.

Historical names aren't much different than when the PSG all used Pokemon names xd

[BabyJesus]

Nathan you're wrong by the way, NANWL has never not allowed the usage of historical names in the past, take the 92nd for example who used historical names and participated in NANWL.

Historical names aren't a really a bother and there's no point in banning them. If a regiment uses historical names they will give their roster to the NANWL staff with the historical names that they use ingame. Just because you can't tell who to "ghost" doesn't mean historical names should be banned.

Oh, last season the 91st couldn't use historical names so I thought it was against the rules. My apologies.

Actually we were allowed to use them against the 79th but a certain reg threw a little fit one match so we didn't use them one match to humor them and the ref.

Historical names aren't much different than when the PSG all used Pokemon names xd

hms is doing that next lb confirmed?

[Lawbringer]

Nathan you're wrong by the way, NANWL has never not allowed the usage of historical names in the past, take the 92nd for example who used historical names and participated in NANWL.

Historical names aren't a really a bother and there's no point in banning them. If a regiment uses historical names they will give their roster to the NANWL staff with the historical names that they use ingame. Just because you can't tell who to "ghost" doesn't mean historical names should be banned.

Oh, last season the 91st couldn't use historical names so I thought it was against the rules. My apologies.

Actually we were allowed to use them against the 79th but a certain reg threw a little fit one match so we didn't use them one match to humor them and the ref.

Historical names aren't much different than when the PSG all used Pokemon names xd

hms is doing that next lb confirmed?

CanIBeAshKetchum

[Windflower]

Nathan you're wrong by the way, NANWL has never not allowed the usage of historical names in the past, take the 92nd for example who used historical names and participated in NANWL.

Historical names aren't a really a bother and there's no point in banning them. If a regiment uses historical names they will give their roster to the NANWL staff with the historical names that they use ingame. Just because you can't tell who to "ghost" doesn't mean historical names should be banned.

Oh, last season the 91st couldn't use historical names so I thought it was against the rules. My apologies.

Actually we were allowed to use them against the 79th but a certain reg threw a little fit one match so we didn't use them one match to humor them and the ref.

Historical names aren't much different than when the PSG all used Pokemon names xd

The Anti-Ghosting tactics were real.

MEOWTH THATS RIGHT.

[BabyJesus]

I think I'm in like 6 regs right now. Is that ok?

Make it 7 regs. Just joined another regiment

[Marceaux]

Don't forget when 111e went as Stormtrooper's vs PSG Rebels.

[Suns]

Don't forget when 111e went as Stormtrooper's vs PSG Rebels.

gr8 1v1 good times good times

[Pickle]

Don't forget when 111e went as Stormtrooper's vs PSG Rebels.

gr8 1v1 good times good times