Messages

16

Confederates / Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"

« on: July 28, 2015, 12:37:40 am »

Doesn't matter how you find his claim. What matters is they claimed it first.

What also matters is their activity. If they haven't been around for ages, why should they still have the right to the name when there is already another 1st Texas that's been active?

Will agree on that one

There isn't "already another" we have been here for ages, we have seen many imposters try to claim 1st Texas as their own, you just tried to take another regiments name, its not like there happened to be another 1st Texas after we have been here.

17

Confederates / Re: The Partisan Rangers

« on: July 27, 2015, 11:14:39 pm »

Long live PRL & 1st Texas!

18

Confederates / Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"

« on: July 27, 2015, 10:56:44 pm »

As the North&South Community Supervisor and also Mod on this thread, I've looked into what you've said and also done some investigating of my own you seem to be on a stand down or have been inactive since 29 March, 2014. You have been inactive well over a year now. Even though you brought the rights to the name on BCoF this is north and south which is completely a different game in itself. Even though you have been around since secession which is a long time ago. Think its about time you either allow someone else use the name or at least get back into the North And South community

No.  In no other regiment-based game or mod has this been acceptable, and to suggest that someone give up their name is hilariously bad.  You have no authority to force someone to declaim a regiment.  If the 1st Texas wants to keep their name, the Partisan Rangers support them.  I mean shit, if you went inactive would you want someone claiming your username?  No.  You'd have none of it.  We all have real lives, and if we have to go inactive because of those lives, tough shit to every Tom, Dick and Jane that wants our names and regiments.

Reposted due to a non-specified delete.

Edit: I've also screenshotted this post, and will take another delete without specification to the proper channels.

Actually, this post is quite on topic and I do agree. I think I will be mustering the 1st Texas to return to N&S. Thank you hairywarhero and LaBelle for pointing us in the right direction.

Thats fine then i'll inform the other 1st Texas

Thank you sir.

19

Confederates / Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"

« on: July 27, 2015, 10:41:37 pm »

As the North&South Community Supervisor and also Mod on this thread, I've looked into what you've said and also done some investigating of my own you seem to be on a stand down or have been inactive since 29 March, 2014. You have been inactive well over a year now. Even though you brought the rights to the name on BCoF this is north and south which is completely a different game in itself. Even though you have been around since secession which is a long time ago. Think its about time you either allow someone else use the name or at least get back into the North And South community

No.  In no other regiment-based game or mod has this been acceptable, and to suggest that someone give up their name is hilariously bad.  You have no authority to force someone to declaim a regiment.  If the 1st Texas wants to keep their name, the Partisan Rangers support them.  I mean shit, if you went inactive would you want someone claiming your username?  No.  You'd have none of it.  We all have real lives, and if we have to go inactive because of those lives, tough shit to every Tom, Dick and Jane that wants our names and regiments.

Reposted due to a non-specified delete.

Edit: I've also screenshotted this post, and will take another delete without specification to the proper channels.

Actually, this post is quite on topic and I do agree. I think I will be mustering the 1st Texas to return to N&S. Thank you hairywarhero and LaBelle for pointing us in the right direction.

20

Confederates / Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"

« on: July 27, 2015, 10:25:46 pm »

As the North&South Community Supervisor and also Mod on this thread, I've looked into what you've said and also done some investigating of my own you seem to be on a stand down or have been inactive since 29 March, 2014. You have been inactive well over a year now. Even though you brought the rights to the name on BCoF this is north and south which is completely a different game in itself. Even though you have been around since secession which is a long time ago. Think its about time you either allow someone else use the name or at least get back into the North And South community

I'm just trying to make it clear that we have reserved the name for BCoF, and we are the original 1st Texas.

21

Confederates / Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"

« on: July 27, 2015, 09:51:43 pm »

Reserving the name for bcof had nothing to do with N&S..........

If we allow these groups to form and hang around for a while it causes a problem for us we would rather avoid as it causes confusion. Besides BCoF we have reserved our name in several mods well before they even thought about it. So regardless our name is still taken.. by us.

22

Confederates / Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"

« on: July 27, 2015, 09:17:40 pm »

They havent attended events in ages Josef, thats why i find his claim rather stupid.

Attending events or not in a while doesn't matter. The fact is that we have been around since secession days and we are keeping our claim on this name, I don't want people to think just because we may not be active for a while means it is okay to take our name. We payed to reserve this name for BCoF whenever it releases, just trying to remind people we are here.

23

Confederates / Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"

« on: July 26, 2015, 07:48:40 pm »

That makes 3 first texas

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=19511.0

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=24916.0

I am confused :c

Us to, but we have been around since secession. https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=985.0

24

Confederates / Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"

« on: July 26, 2015, 07:43:08 pm »

It seems people think we have died! We're still alive.

25

Confederates / Re: 1st Texas Southerns [DA_1stTx] [ITA]

« on: July 26, 2015, 07:41:45 pm »

Sorry, 1st Texas is taken. https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=3570.msg560315#msg560315

26

Confederates / Re: Longstreet's Army Division 1st Corps List of Regiments:

« on: July 26, 2015, 07:40:34 pm »

1st Texas is already in use ( https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=20698.0 ) Please check before you post.

It is already in use. But it is not them! https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=3570.msg560315

27

Confederates / Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"

« on: March 28, 2014, 09:11:52 pm »

Roster updated, we're back baby.

28

Confederates / Re: [EU/NA] The Dixieland Army

« on: March 23, 2014, 08:17:11 pm »

Regiment Name: 1st Texas Infantry
Regiment Class: Infantry
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/NBF/
Regiment Size: 8 Atleast, will be re-activating and messaging old members, could double.

29

Events: EU / Re: Active NW/Modifications Event Schedule [EU/NA] (New Owner)

« on: March 16, 2014, 04:08:02 pm »

Event Name (As you want it to be listed)  10th Wednesday LB
Thread Link  https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=14016.0
Day of the Week and time of the event  Wednesday, 8 PM EST
gamemode Battle
Short description (2 sentences or less) Wednesday night Linebattle. Brand new, all regiments welcome.

30

Events: EU / Re: 47th Wednesday American LB

« on: March 06, 2014, 03:03:09 am »

Good event everyone. We will continue to improve! Thanks for all who came.