Flying Squirrel Entertainment
The Lounge => Off Topic => Forum Games => Topic started by: Bravescot on December 07, 2016, 10:47:35 am
-
Lots of unhappiness expressed on the new thread. Let's get democratic on this shit.
-
Self bump/double post for poll. Absolutely shameless
-
I say give up.
She is unfit to lead a forum game. A leader which cannot deliver promises should not lead, period.
-
A player base which needs and demands more than one month to send in plans, is unfit to take part in a forum game.
-
#DownWithForumGames
-
I say give up.
She is unfit to lead a forum game. A leader which cannot deliver promises should not lead, period.
I disagree although I do not always agree with her ways of running her games she has been and continues to be the most commited gm we've had.
But tbh I can't really be arsed to play another BoP atm.
-
A player base which needs and demands more than one month to send in plans, is unfit to take part in a forum game.
I assume you didn't aim that just towards me, but remember the 1 player that sent plans? Yeah, that was me.
Get why I am pissed Furrnox?
-
A player base which needs and demands more than one month to send in plans, is unfit to take part in a forum game.
I assume you didn't aim that just towards me, but remember the 1 player that sent plans? Yeah, that was me.
Get why I am pissed Furrnox?
so you like playing games by yourself too?
-
A player base which needs and demands more than one month to send in plans, is unfit to take part in a forum game.
I assume you didn't aim that just towards me, but remember the 1 player that sent plans? Yeah, that was me.
Get why I am pissed Furrnox?
Actually it wasn't you. ??? I assumed your plans were not 100%, even though your part of the plans were sent, because it only contained your portion of the strategy, and it called for more people.
-
A player base which needs and demands more than one month to send in plans, is unfit to take part in a forum game.
I assume you didn't aim that just towards me, but remember the 1 player that sent plans? Yeah, that was me.
Get why I am pissed Furrnox?
Actually it wasn't you. ??? I assumed your plans were not 100%, even though your part of the plans were sent, because it only contained your portion of the strategy, and it called for more people.
Well assuming is not asking and making sure.
-
A player base which needs and demands more than one month to send in plans, is unfit to take part in a forum game.
I assume you didn't aim that just towards me, but remember the 1 player that sent plans? Yeah, that was me.
Get why I am pissed Furrnox?
Actually it wasn't you. ??? I assumed your plans were not 100%, even though your part of the plans were sent, because it only contained your portion of the strategy, and it called for more people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rr88Szc5q0
-
There just should have been a ban list long ago. This board should have had proper moderation and management long ago. Of the 20ish people who played AoE, I'd say only a handful were bad seeds, but those bad seeds would go on to ruin other games (not to say they ruined AoE, since it ended due to another BoP returning), and slow, jumbled, inexperienced management of those later games coupled with that would of course lead to dead games. It's the same type of person to post #DownWithForumGames when they're among the most historically deconstructive towards them, and insists being apart of each one.
If you have a history of having negative impacts on a game as either the GM or a player, you should consider stopping indefinitely. That said, I hope Volk's new BoP does well simply because I like the appeal of it, as supplies, resources, and trade (seemingly) matters, and I hope Volk has a good team. I just hope it's not ruined by a) misbehaving cuckfucks or b) inexperience at management.
Remember, Volk: not everyone has to have their turn, that's up to them. If they don't, roll the dice, or give them an appropriate disadvantage. If you think it's particularly crucial, and they don't take their turn, they missed their turn. That's all there should be to it.
As a footnote, since I think it's worth mentioning, Volk and his "hidden" GMs (not a good idea, imo, they should be public) have clearly put a ton of work into this thing. Recreating the Falkland Islands in the style of EUIV's map and adding resources, climates, and trade systems is legitimately impressive, and I hope it wouldn't be made by someone without the patience to actually conduct the game, since that's borderline insanity.
-
There just should have been a ban list long ago. This board should have had proper moderation and management long ago. Of the 20ish people who played AoE, I'd say only a handful were bad seeds, but those bad seeds would go on to ruin other games (not to say they ruined AoE, since it ended due to another BoP returning), and slow, jumbled, inexperienced management of those later games coupled with that would of course lead to dead games. It's the same type of person to post #DownWithForumGames when they're among the most historically deconstructive towards them, and insists being apart of each one.
If you have a history of having negative impacts on a game as either the GM or a player, you should consider stopping indefinitely. That said, I hope Volk's new BoP does well simply because I like the appeal of it, as supplies, resources, and trade (seemingly) matters, and I hope Volk has a good team. I just hope it's not ruined by a) misbehaving cuckfucks or b) inexperience at management.
Remember, Volk: not everyone has to have their turn, that's up to them. If they don't, roll the dice, or give them an appropriate disadvantage. If you think it's particularly crucial, and they don't take their turn, they missed their turn. That's all there should be to it.
As a footnote, since I think it's worth mentioning, Volk and his "hidden" GMs (not a good idea, imo, they should be public) have clearly put a ton of work into this thing. Recreating the Falkland Islands in the style of EUIV's map and adding resources, climates, and trade systems is legitimately impressive, and I hope it wouldn't be made by someone without the patience to actually conduct the game, since that's borderline insanity.
i hope your not referring to me
-
you're*
-
you're*
http://everydayfeminism.com/2016/09/grammar-snobs-are-wrong/ (http://everydayfeminism.com/2016/09/grammar-snobs-are-wrong/)
-
actually im not a snob, i have a diploma saying grammar is my job
-
You heard her - people who are grammar snobs are likely to be more whiter.