1. - No shooting while charging or out of formation! That means your line has to be stationary! Also, no reloading whilst you are engaged in melee! Officers are allowed to fire their pistols in the charge, however no ranker can fire a pistol in the charge! Officers cannot reload during the charge or in melee though either! 2. - Only 1 line per regiment (it can be single, double, triple etc file). If a line is down to 2 people, the line has to charge! 3. - Lines must act as one! If one man in your line is engaged in melee, the rest have to engage in melee too! This means, you cannot split off some men to stall the enemy line in melee and have the rest form up, waiting for those who stalled to die in melee, so that the lined up rest can shoot! 4. - No bonuses activated 5. - No musicians or ensigns 6. - Only 2 officers allowed! Officers MUST choose the Officer class! 7. - No officer targeting! (Officers charging are fair game!) If a regiment chooses to use 2 officers, shooting either is officer aim! Shooting an officer can result in anything from a warning or if vital to the round, to a repetition of the round. If officers are targeted continuously, even after warning, you can be kicked from the event. If the line is stationary and the officer moves behind or in front of his line, it is his own fault. Officers should also try to move off to the side of their line, leaving a gap to their line thus minimizing the chance of them getting shot, however if they stay in the line it is still officer aiming. Don't aim for the front of the line, simple as! If the officer is shot and the round is not reset immediately but a ranker takes over acting as an officer, you cannot shoot him either. That new officer is identifiable by being the person in the front of the line. 8. - Addressing gaps while in a fire exchange is not mandatory. However when you line up at first, you cannot have ANY spacing! Officers are allowed to move around the line freely and can stand next to the line or behind, however can not move forward on their own to get closer for shooting. 9. - 10 rounds that have to be played, after 5 rounds spawn swap 10. - Both leaders have to agree on a map 11. - The playable maps are only: Random Medium Plains, Desert, Steppe, and Snow. If both regiments agree, custom maps can be used aswell. 12. - The number of players per team is limited from 10 minimum to an open maximum (If a regiment fails to bring the minimum, they will have to play as if they had 10 or forfeit the match. Hence the opposing regiment could bring 11) 13. - The difference in numbers may only be 1 man! 14. - The home team (Team on the left) may choose its faction first 15. - The battles will take place on the home team's server. Naturally if both leaders agree on playing on the away team's server, that is allowed. 16. - Only line units are allowed; no light infantry, guard infantry, marine units, militia, or skirmishers. 17. - The battles must be fought before a certain deadline, the deadline will not be extended unless under special circumstances. Before the deadline also means, that if you are uncertain about being able to play a match during its designated week, you can play that match a week or weeks in advance. 18. - If one regiment does not appear on time (15 minutes grace period, then the battle must start), the opponent will get a 10-0 win | 19. - If both teams do not appear, they will get a 0-0 loss (no points) 20. - Invites are NOT allowed; if we find out that a regiment played with invites, we will remove a win and 3 points and the opposing regiment, if it lost, will be given the win 21. - The results of a match will be posted here, take screenshots to be sure your oponent will not try to cheat you out of your victory 22. - If a regiment has something to complain about because the opponent did not follow the rules, it has to prove it (video or screenshot); there might not be referees! 23. - If the accusations are correct the organizers will decide how harsh to punish them, which can range from a warning to a kick! 24. - If a regiment complains repeatedly and then does not turn up any evidence or this evidence turns out to be false, they will be subject to the same procedure! 25. - Be respectful and use common knowledge and courtesy. Insulting or any other sort of verbal abuse will be punished! 26. - Camping is naturally allowed, but if rounds take too long and the camping becomes excessive, you will be forced to engage! Excessive camping is considered by us to be holding one position (hill for instance) for roughly 3 minutes! Forcing to engage means, you have to leave your position and get close to your enemy (close volleys or melee). You are NOT allowed to return to that position again that round! 27. - If regiments are tied in points, the regiment having a better "rounds lost and won" ratio, will receive the higher place in the league. (For instance: Regiment 1 has 3 points and Regiment 2 has 3 points too! Regiment 1 has a ratio of 9 rounds won, 1 lost and Regiment 2 has a ratio of 8 rounds won and 1 lost. Regiment 1 will then receive the higher place, since they have +8, wheras Regiment 2 has +6! If the ratio is equal too, the direct comparison will be drawn, meaning the linebattle the regiments had against each other will be looked at. The winner of that, will be placed higher. If that too was a draw, there will be a another match between the two regiments in order to determine who will be placed higher. That match cannot end in a draw! If it is 5-5 at the end of 10 rounds, one last round will be played! 28. - Referees are to be treated with respect! Their decisions count and are supposed to be accepted! If someone is a referee, that means he has earned the trust of the organizers and should not be treated any different than the organizer. If you do have a complaint about a decision a referee made or the referee himself, let the organizers know via steam or this thread and PROVIDE evidence! If you fail to comply with a referee you will be punished according to the violation (warning up to booting from competition)! So accept the referee's decisions, no matter if he is abusing and AFTER the linebattle you can complain to the organizers! 29. - Referees can enact rules or punishments during the linebattle that are not mentioned on this thread. If you feel the rules were unjust or simply not to your liking, complain on this thread and provide evidence. Do not simply ignore and undermine the referee's authority, which would mean you are breaking rules (Rule 27). Instead make a case after the linebattle! 30. - Having members that are in 2 or more regiments is against the rules! Those people who are in multiple regiments will be banned and if the regiments knowingly accepted someone from another regiment just so as to play the person, they can be banned too! European and Australian players are allowed however, seeing as they are in a seperate community! Being in multiple regimental steam groups is considered double-reging! You can remain in regimental steam groups of regiments that are inactive/disbanded, but not in active ones! 31. - You are not allowed to have a player spawn in only to give your officer a musket and then switch to spectator. This gives an even more unfair advantage to the larger regiment. |
Regimental Steam Contacts 71st Highland Regiment of Foot Leader: Cheeseypants (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198018571754/) 2nd in Command: Blade (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198032822276/) 63eme Régiment d'Infanterie de Ligne Leader: Karth (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198007614469/) 2nd in Command: Offizer (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198009656129/) 58eme Régiment d'Infanterie de Ligne Leader: Lawbringer (https://steamcommunity.com/id/th3lawbringer/) Pontifical Swiss Guard Leader: Windflower (https://steamcommunity.com/id/windflower1/) 2nd in Command: KnightofStJohn (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198096252046) 79th "Queens Own" Cameron Highlanders Leader: Armystrong (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198018680056/) 2nd in Command: Modernassassin (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Modernassassin315/) 2nd Sibiriskii Grendarski Guard Leader: MorningFire (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198059558020/) Second in Command: TimJay (https://steamcommunity.com/id/timjay) 34e Regiment D'Infanterie de Ligne Leader:Maxwell (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198064340689/) Second in Command: 16th Middlesex (London Irish) Rifle Volunteer Corps Leader: Jetch (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198091469181/) Second in Command: 4th Prince of Wales' Own Volunteers Leader: Nico (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198048169008/) Second in Command: Jorsonner (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Jorsonner) 45eme Regiment d'Infanterie de Ligne Leader: NappySurena (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198035654499/) Second in Command: Bryce (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198088761327/) Third in Command: Silence (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198040740271/) 1stRI Regiment of Foot Leader: Allen (https://steamcommunity.com/id/470362/) Second in Command: Julius (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Roman-Salvador) [close] |
| Place | Regiment | Points | Games Won | Games Tied | Games Lost | Rounds Won | Rounds Lost | Rounds Won/Lost Aggregate |
| 1. | 1a Svea Livgarde | 24 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 21 | +38 |
| 2. | 63eme Régiment d'Infanterie de Ligne | 21 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 60 | 20 | +40 |
| 3. | 22e Régiment d'Infanterie | 16 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 46 | 34 | +12 |
| 4. | Moskovskii Grenaderskie Polki | 15 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 45 | 35 | +10 |
| 5. | 8th Kings Regiment of Foot | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 45 | -10 |
| 6. | Royal Green Jackets | 6 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 37 | 43 | -6 |
| 7. | 1st Foreign Legion | 6 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 26 | 54 | -28 |
| 8. | 73rd Regiment of Foot "Macleod's Highlanders" | 6 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 59 | -38 |
| 9. | 27th Inniskilling Regiment of Foot | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 31 | 49 | -18 |
| Place | Regiment | Points | Games Won | Games Tied | Games Lost | Rounds Won | Rounds Lost | Rounds Won/Lost Aggregate |
| 1. | 12th "East Suffolk" Regiment of Foot | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 4 | +42 |
| 2. | 3eme Voltigeur de la Garde | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 39 | 11 | +28 |
| 3. | 54th Regiment of Foot "West Norfolk" | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 20 | +10 |
| 4. | United States Marine Corps | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 34 | -18 |
| 5. | 4th Silesian Landwehr | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 34 | -18 |
| 6. | Pułk 8. Piechoty Xięstwa Warszawskiego | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 47 | -44 |
| Place | Regiment | Points | Games Won | Games Tied | Games Lost | Rounds Won | Rounds Lost | Rounds Won/Lost Aggregate |
| 1. | 63eme Régiment d'Infanterie de Ligne | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 34 | 16 | +18 |
| 2. | 71st Highland Regiment of Foot | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 33 | 17 | +16 |
| 3. | 2te Garde Grenadiere | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 33 | 17 | +16 |
| 4. | 8. Leib (Nr.1 Brandenburgisches) Infantrie-Regiment | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 30 | -10 |
| 5. | 54th Regiment of Foot "West Norfolk" | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 30 | -10 |
| 6. | 15e Regiment de Voltigeurs de la Garde Imperiale | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 40 | -30 |
| Place | Regiment | Points | Games Won | Games Tied | Games Lost | Rounds Won | Rounds Lost | Rounds Won/Lost Aggregate |
| 1. | 5th Northumberland Fusiliers | 22 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 57 | 23 | +34 |
| 2. | 22eme Régiment d'Infanterie | 20 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 60 | 20 | +40 |
| 3. | United States Marine Corps | 15 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 40 | 40 | +0 |
| 4. | Nr.7 Grenadier Battalion "Freiherr von Schroder" | 13 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 41 | 39 | +2 |
| 5. | 27th Inniskilling Regiment of Foot | 12 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 43 | 37 | +6 |
| 6. | 35th "Sussex" Regiment of Foot | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 35 | 45 | -10 |
| 7. | 1er Régiment de Chasseurs-à-Pied de la Garde Impériale | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 31 | 49 | -18 |
| 8. | 4th Silesian Landwehr | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 29 | 51 | -22 |
| 9. | 87th Royal Irish Fusiliers | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 24 | 56 | -32 |
| Place | Regiment | Points | Games Won | Games Tied | Games Lost | Rounds Won | Rounds Lost | Rounds Won/Lost Aggregate |
| 1. | 71st Highland Regiment of Foot | 19 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 62 | 8 | +54 |
| 2. | 63eme Régiment d'Infanterie de Ligne | 19 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 56 | 14 | +42 |
| 3. | 18th (Royal Irish) Regiment of Foot | 13 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 46 | 24 | +22 |
| 4. | Leib-Gvardii Gusarskii Polk | 12 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 35 | +0 |
| 5. | 40th (2nd Somersetshire) Regiment of Foot | 8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 30 | 40 | -10 |
| 6. | 79th "Queens Own" Cameron Highlanders | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 45 | -30 |
| 7. | 54th Regiment of Foot "West Norfolk" | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 48 | -36 |
| 8. | 33e Régiment d'Infanterie de Ligne | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 14 | 56 | -42 |
| Place | Regiment | Points | Games Won | Games Tied | Games Lost | Rounds Won | Rounds Lost | Rounds Won/Lost Aggregate |
| 1. | Nr.37 Infanterie Regiment "Freiherr von Auffenberg" | 24 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 20 | +40 |
| 2. | Nr.7 Grenadier Battalion Stark "Carl Schröder" | 16 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 43 | 27 | +16 |
| 3. | Pontifical Swiss Guard | 12 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 42 | 28 | +14 |
| 4. | 87th Royal Irish Fusiliers | 12 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 39 | 41 | -2 |
| 5. | 84e Régiment d'Infanterie de ligne "Un Contre Dix" | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 34 | 46 | -12 |
| 6. | United States Marine Corps | 9 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 37 | 43 | -6 |
| 7. | 30th (Cambridgeshire) Regiment of Foot | 9 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 35 | 45 | -10 |
| 8. | Nr.9 Infantry Regiment | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 27 | 33 | -6 |
| 9. | 27th Inniskilling Regiment of Foot | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 23 | 47 | -24 |
| Place | Regiment | Points | Games Won | Games Tied | Games Lost | Rounds Won | Rounds Lost | Rounds Won/Lost Aggregate |
| 1. | 63eme Régiment d'Infanterie de Ligne | 24 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 71 | 9 | +62 |
| 2. | 71st Highland Regiment of Foot | 15 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 39 | +2 |
| 3. | 18th (Royal Irish) Regiment of Foot | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 38 | 42 | -4 |
| 4. | 58eme Régiment d'Infanterie de Ligne | 9 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 41 | 39 | +2 |
| 5. | 1tes Braunschweigisches Leib-Bataillon "Black Legion" | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 71 | -62 |
| Place | Regiment | Points | Games Won | Games Tied | Games Lost | Rounds Won | Rounds Lost | Rounds Won/Lost Aggregate |
| 1. | United States Marine Corps | 13 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 12 | +26 |
| 2. | 79th "Queens Own" Cameron Highlanders | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 28 | 22 | +6 |
| 3. | Pontifical Swiss Guard | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 26 | -2 |
| 4. | 87th Royal Irish Fusiliers | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 29 | -8 |
| 5. | 9th "East Norfolk" Regiment of Foot | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 33 | -16 |
| 6. | 84e Régiment d'Infanterie de ligne "Un Contre Dix" | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 28 | -6 |
Match you need a deadline extention for:
Why do you need a deadline extention?:
How long would you like this extention to be?Post Again or what?
No need to reapply!Yey! Thxs Boss!
Cheesey Are you the only Person Running NWL right Now or do you have someone else helping you?I think Cockflower is trial mod
I'm the only one helping Cheeseypants at the moment, but unfortunately I'll be gone until the end of the month.Good luck when you come back!
Thank you :)I'm the only one helping Cheeseypants at the moment, but unfortunately I'll be gone until the end of the month.Good luck when you come back!
I'm the only one helping Cheeseypants at the moment, but unfortunately I'll be gone until the end of the month.Rip bb flower till 30th
Good luck cheesy :)Thank you sir Noodle
Regiment: 4th Prince of Wales' Own Volunteers
Estimated attendance: 15-20
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198048169008
Accept rules?: Yes, Of course.
Well, sign-ups are way past due, but since Karth has been away I guess I'll apply to see what happens.
Regiment: 80th Staffordshire Volunteers "The Staffordshire Knots"
Estimated attendance: 12-15
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/titanicjackdawson
Accept rules?: Definitely.
Regiment: 45eme Regiment d'Infanterie de Ligne
Estimated attendance: 12-17
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/LacedaemonTheGreat/ Second In Command - https://steamcommunity.com/id/45eBryce/ - Third In Command - https://steamcommunity.com/id/hrty8ewfguwWO/
Accept rules?: Of Course!
First batch of ACCEPTED Applications:Regiment: 4th Prince of Wales' Own Volunteers
Estimated attendance: 15-20
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198048169008
Accept rules?: Yes, Of course.Well, sign-ups are way past due, but since Karth has been away I guess I'll apply to see what happens.
Regiment: 80th Staffordshire Volunteers "The Staffordshire Knots"
Estimated attendance: 12-15
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/titanicjackdawson
Accept rules?: Definitely.
First batch of ACCEPTED Applications:Regiment: 4th Prince of Wales' Own Volunteers
Estimated attendance: 15-20
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198048169008
Accept rules?: Yes, Of course.Well, sign-ups are way past due, but since Karth has been away I guess I'll apply to see what happens.
Regiment: 80th Staffordshire Volunteers "The Staffordshire Knots"
Estimated attendance: 12-15
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/titanicjackdawson
Accept rules?: Definitely.
WOOT WOOT
Community Name: Orcaryo10/10 Approve!
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/orcaryo/
Regiment: 42nd
Why do you want to be a referee? I was a ref in the old NANWL ran by Zzehth and Jackie. Want to see and help it make a comeback
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I was a ref for the old one, reffed many 1v1s. Ran a couple of LBs for a period of time. Since I am not in a reg in this, I will be unbiased.
Admin Experience: NA1 and NA GFing admin, admined a couple of events. Reffed 1v1s as well
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes
First batch of ACCEPTED Applications:Regiment: 4th Prince of Wales' Own Volunteers
Estimated attendance: 15-20
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198048169008
Accept rules?: Yes, Of course.Well, sign-ups are way past due, but since Karth has been away I guess I'll apply to see what happens.
Regiment: 80th Staffordshire Volunteers "The Staffordshire Knots"
Estimated attendance: 12-15
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/titanicjackdawson
Accept rules?: Definitely.
WOOT WOOT
Edited original post, 45e also accepted at this time.
I was told by Cheese that he has a pile of accepted regiments, he just only had time at home today to publically accept the 3.Okay Thxs 4 the Update Theo!
I was told by Cheese that he has a pile of accepted regiments, he just only had time at home today to publically accept the 3.
trueI was told by Cheese that he has a pile of accepted regiments, he just only had time at home today to publically accept the 3.
Well I mean, when a regiment who applied after us is accepted, and then its edited to include another regiment who applied after us, that is typically not a good sign.
I doubt we get accepted.I was told by Cheese that he has a pile of accepted regiments, he just only had time at home today to publically accept the 3.
Well I mean, when a regiment who applied after us is accepted, and then its edited to include another regiment who applied after us, that is typically not a good sign.
Look, while I can't comment on the status of your application I wouldn't be to worried, Cheese has already labelled most of them as accepted, and besides, he did not DENY any yet or at all, so I expect either tmw or the next day most if not all will be accepted.I was told by Cheese that he has a pile of accepted regiments, he just only had time at home today to publically accept the 3.
Well I mean, when a regiment who applied after us is accepted, and then its edited to include another regiment who applied after us, that is typically not a good sign.
Look, while I can't comment on the status of your application I wouldn't be to worried, Cheese has already labelled most of them as accepted, and besides, he did not DENY any yet or at all, so I expect either tmw or the next day most if not all will be accepted.I was told by Cheese that he has a pile of accepted regiments, he just only had time at home today to publically accept the 3.
Well I mean, when a regiment who applied after us is accepted, and then its edited to include another regiment who applied after us, that is typically not a good sign.
When you applied really doesn't matter.
Niether does personal history with 71st either- this is a community league, speculation without reason about acceptance or denial is not the way to go.
It isint, you're right, I was just making sure that you and other knew it wasn't. I am sorry for the long wait, I will recommended to the Cheese that your application be publically processed, but you have to realize these things take time. I have been waiting for as long as you have to know wether I will be reffing or not. I appreciate the patience the community has showed, and I know how tough it is to wait, but I implore the community to extend it's already gracious patience a tiny bit longer.Look, while I can't comment on the status of your application I wouldn't be to worried, Cheese has already labelled most of them as accepted, and besides, he did not DENY any yet or at all, so I expect either tmw or the next day most if not all will be accepted.I was told by Cheese that he has a pile of accepted regiments, he just only had time at home today to publically accept the 3.
Well I mean, when a regiment who applied after us is accepted, and then its edited to include another regiment who applied after us, that is typically not a good sign.
When you applied really doesn't matter.
Niether does personal history with 71st either- this is a community league, speculation without reason about acceptance or denial is not the way to go.
Well, I feel if I applied first, my application would've been looked at first, and should've been processed first, especially when I've been waiting longer than (aside from the 4th) almost everyone. So its also kind of a courtesy thing.
I didn't think personal history with 71st was a factor, so I don't know why its being brought up? My reason for speculation was that we applied first, and have been waiting a while for an answer.
Alright so let me clear all of this up,
First off, applications are not necessarily looked at or processed in the order they were posted originally. I couldn't even be home all day today, relying instead on a .txt file that had a list of all applications. I have many more on my desktop at home that can be accepted, but I did what I could while out of the house. There are applications that I will need to look into farther, like talking to the applying regiments officers in teamspeak.
I believe that far too many of you are making unreasonable assumptions both of the status of your application and myself as well. I have agreed with all NANWL participants and applicants that there will be respect from me, regardless of personal shit, as long as it remains mutual respect. I have not violated this as of yet with anyone.
Lastly, do keep in mind that this league was dropped on me about a week ago. Until just recently it was a one man effort. These things take time to do, and even more time to do correctly. Understand that even when this was a 7 man job ( 3 HOs 4 Mods) it was still a lot of work.
We are getting this going as soon as possible, and many more applications will be processed and posted.
Regiment: 75th
Estimated attendance: 15-20
Leader's Steam:https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198058209961/
Accept rules?: Of course!
Regiment: 16th Coldstream Regiment of Footguards
Estimated attendance: 10-15.
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198007703968
Accept rules?:Yes
If possible, can we be put in League 2?
Regiment: 34e Regiment D'Infanterie de Ligne
Estimated attendance: 15-20
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/34eMaxwell/
Accept rules?: yes Of Course Pleb
Regiment: 1stRI
Estimated attendance: 10-18
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/470362/
Accept rules?: Yes
I was born for league 1meh
You should 10000000% be in league 1.I was born for league 1meh
So should 111e- they are undeafeated! They tied 58e, deserve league 1You should 10000000% be in league 1.I was born for league 1meh
You should 10000000% be in league 1.I was born for league 1meh
We're bad though
I Agree WIth Theo 111e Should be in League 1 And Of Course USMC/58eSo should 111e- they are undeafeated! They tied 58e, deserve league 1You should 10000000% be in league 1.I was born for league 1meh
75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
75th-------------------------------->League 2
75th-------------------------------->League 2NO
We are fucking shit, honestlyWe WIll See Sunday If Your bad Or Not!
75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
We are fucking shit, honestly
75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
except this time they wont have all their double reggers
Law 75th are Still Good Without Double Reggers .......
lol75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
except this time they wont have all their double reggers
Law 75th are Still Good Without Double Reggers .......
They're worse than us
we beat 71st without double reggers.lol75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
except this time they wont have all their double reggers
Law 75th are Still Good Without Double Reggers .......
They're worse than us
18th we played Jetch for the half and Ghostpig for the other half. Jetch is no longer 75th & Ghostpig has his time to decide. IDK why you think we depend on double reggers. Everyone on that old roster is no longer a 75th member or has left their other regiment.
75th-------------------------------->League 1
And yet you want league one if you claim that you beat us without double reggers? Makes no sense.18th we played Jetch for the half and Ghostpig for the other half. Jetch is no longer 75th & Ghostpig has his time to decide. IDK why you think we depend on double reggers. Everyone on that old roster is no longer a 75th member or has left their other regiment.we beat 71st without double reggers.lol75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
except this time they wont have all their double reggers
Law 75th are Still Good Without Double Reggers .......
They're worse than us
Did you even read?And yet you want league one if you claim that you beat us without double reggers? Makes no sense.18th we played Jetch for the half and Ghostpig for the other half. Jetch is no longer 75th & Ghostpig has his time to decide. IDK why you think we depend on double reggers. Everyone on that old roster is no longer a 75th member or has left their other regiment.we beat 71st without double reggers.lol75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
except this time they wont have all their double reggers
Law 75th are Still Good Without Double Reggers .......
They're worse than us
Yes, I read people chirping you and Alexander saying you should be in league two, my post was saying you guys should be in league one if you can beat us without double reggers. If you read hard enough you will realize i'm actually COMPLIMENTING you.Did you even read?And yet you want league one if you claim that you beat us without double reggers? Makes no sense.18th we played Jetch for the half and Ghostpig for the other half. Jetch is no longer 75th & Ghostpig has his time to decide. IDK why you think we depend on double reggers. Everyone on that old roster is no longer a 75th member or has left their other regiment.we beat 71st without double reggers.lol75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
except this time they wont have all their double reggers
Law 75th are Still Good Without Double Reggers .......
They're worse than us
Lol if you believe Alex thinks we should be in league 2 lol.Yes, I read people chirping you and Alexander saying you should be in league two, my post was saying you guys should be in league one if you can beat us without double reggers. If you read hard enough you will realize i'm actually COMPLIMENTING you.Did you even read?And yet you want league one if you claim that you beat us without double reggers? Makes no sense.18th we played Jetch for the half and Ghostpig for the other half. Jetch is no longer 75th & Ghostpig has his time to decide. IDK why you think we depend on double reggers. Everyone on that old roster is no longer a 75th member or has left their other regiment.we beat 71st without double reggers.lol75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
except this time they wont have all their double reggers
Law 75th are Still Good Without Double Reggers .......
They're worse than us
I was born for league 2
K75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
except this time they wont have all their double reggersWe are fucking shit, honestly
Nah, you weren't kidding about where you deserve to be, at least with this rule-setK75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
except this time they wont have all their double reggersWe are fucking shit, honestly
Underestimating is a very bad thing, are you yet to learn?
I was kidding you fucking nerds
We'll see about that. ;)Nah, you weren't kidding about where you deserve to be, at least with this rule-setK75th-------------------------------->League 2Please, you just beat the 18th and the 71st in a month. Don't even try
except this time they wont have all their double reggersWe are fucking shit, honestly
Underestimating is a very bad thing, are you yet to learn?
I was kidding you fucking nerds
how come every time the 75th posts there is some sort of argument/saltBecause everyone is mad we won 4 rounds in a row to beat the fan favorite 18th.
k.
If you are here to shitpost, don't post at all.how come every time the 75th posts there is some sort of argument/saltBecause everyone is mad we won 4 rounds in a row to beat the fan favorite 18th.
Just got to keep it real yo. We'll win without the double reggers too. Might not take the title, but we'll do good.
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0hfuHI8OmaR
Others are bashing me? And you are too???If you are here to shitpost, don't post at all.how come every time the 75th posts there is some sort of argument/saltBecause everyone is mad we won 4 rounds in a row to beat the fan favorite 18th.
Just got to keep it real yo. We'll win without the double reggers too. Might not take the title, but we'll do good.
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0hfuHI8OmaR
This thread is clean.
How about both of you just not bring what happened to TNWL onto this thread. That would be greatly appreciated.Alright.
Regiment: 2nd Sibiriskii Grendarski Guards/2nd Siberian Guards
Estimated attendance: 15-20
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/MorningFire
Accept rules?: Yes
Name: Emo Celestia
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/sniperizemo/
Regiment: 34e
Date when banned: October 2014
Name the rule/s you broke: Hopping from deadeyes regiment to the 60th Foot
How did you break this/these rule/s? Hopping
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: Yes, ever since 31e disbanded again, Ive been in 34e for about a month now. And Im loving. I dont plan on leaving, well of course unless the regiment disbands.
I know you're busy, but I was wondering about the 2eDL application if there is anyupdate that'd be great :-)Can you repost it?
Regiment: 2e Régiment de Chevau-Légers Lanciers de la Garde Impériale
Estimated attendance: 10+
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/AnalD3stroyer/
Accept rules?: yes
Regiment: 2e Régiment de Chevau-Légers Lanciers de la Garde Impériale
Estimated attendance: 10+
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/AnalD3stroyer/
Accept rules?: yes
With regret, this application is rejected. The application was rejected because of concerns regarding the longevity of the regiment in question.
Its ok Cheesy has always been biased toward us anyway hf budRegiment: 2e Régiment de Chevau-Légers Lanciers de la Garde Impériale
Estimated attendance: 10+
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/AnalD3stroyer/
Accept rules?: yes
With regret, this application is rejected. The application was rejected because of concerns regarding the longevity of the regiment in question.
Alright, I don't know if this changes anything but alot of people misunderstand Fancy and Andee. They have never really disbanded they just continuously name change and in this case a name change would not effect us playing in NWL we would just play under a different name. If this doesnt change anything good luck with the league and good luck to all the regiments participating
???Its ok Cheesy has always been biased toward us anyway hf budRegiment: 2e Régiment de Chevau-Légers Lanciers de la Garde Impériale
Estimated attendance: 10+
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/AnalD3stroyer/
Accept rules?: yes
With regret, this application is rejected. The application was rejected because of concerns regarding the longevity of the regiment in question.
Alright, I don't know if this changes anything but alot of people misunderstand Fancy and Andee. They have never really disbanded they just continuously name change and in this case a name change would not effect us playing in NWL we would just play under a different name. If this doesnt change anything good luck with the league and good luck to all the regiments participating
Since the USMC won League 2 last season, shouldn't they be in League 1? Just wondering... :PI agree they should be in league 1. Also they have a lot of talent in that reg.Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/16b9866345a6c2a4793be9e95d282cf0.png)[close]
Since the USMC won League 2 last season, shouldn't they be in League 1? Just wondering... :PSpoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/16b9866345a6c2a4793be9e95d282cf0.png)[close]
Regiment: 3eVolt
Estimated attendance: 15-20
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/grimsight3e
Accept rules?: Yes
Salt is not needed on this thread.Its ok Cheesy has always been biased toward us anyway hf budRegiment: 2e Régiment de Chevau-Légers Lanciers de la Garde Impériale
Estimated attendance: 10+
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/AnalD3stroyer/
Accept rules?: yes
With regret, this application is rejected. The application was rejected because of concerns regarding the longevity of the regiment in question.
Alright, I don't know if this changes anything but alot of people misunderstand Fancy and Andee. They have never really disbanded they just continuously name change and in this case a name change would not effect us playing in NWL we would just play under a different name. If this doesnt change anything good luck with the league and good luck to all the regiments participating
then why are you hereIts ok Cheesy has always been biased toward us anyway hf budSalt is not needed on this thread.
I will salt up every other thread on this forum than this one. You should follow suit, or simply not post.then why are you hereIts ok Cheesy has always been biased toward us anyway hf budSalt is not needed on this thread.
Regiment: 3eVolt
Estimated attendance: 15-20
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/grimsight3e
Accept rules?: Yes
Denied.
So accepted or denied for 2nd?M8 expect to be denied you were in 4 different regs for every single season and those regs you were only in for 1 match.
He Was? :oSo accepted or denied for 2nd?M8 expect to be denied you were in 4 different regs for every single season and those regs you were only in for 1 match.
So.... no shitposting on this thread? :-[
Ye 5th first season. and like 3 other regs.He Was? :oSo accepted or denied for 2nd?M8 expect to be denied you were in 4 different regs for every single season and those regs you were only in for 1 match.
Ye 5th first season. and like 3 other regs.He Was? :oSo accepted or denied for 2nd?M8 expect to be denied you were in 4 different regs for every single season and those regs you were only in for 1 match.
5th 2nd season, after we allowed em to rejoin for some ungodly reason.
Played with Nr37 in the 3rd Season
5th season IDK who he played for but I remember him playing.
Name: Emo Celestia
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/sniperizemo/
Regiment: 34e
Date when banned: October 2014
Name the rule/s you broke: Hopping from deadeyes regiment to the 60th Foot
How did you break this/these rule/s? Hopping
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: Yes, ever since 31e disbanded again, Ive been in 34e for about a month now. And Im loving. I dont plan on leaving, well of course unless the regiment disbands.
You have a history of disbanding often, and we can't have that in the league.Once must be pretty often
No disrespect, just doing what is best for the league.
I've never done nwl or tnwl.? Sure I reg hopped in the past but recently haven't and never done a league..In the past, but left 4 regiments 3ish weeks ago to form 2ndQF.
Yeh Chan I Don't Remember him ever being in the Nr37 and LAw Would Know Because He Had the whole reg on steamI've never done nwl or tnwl.? Sure I reg hopped in the past but recently haven't and never done a league..In the past, but left 4 regiments 3ish weeks ago to form 2ndQF.
Also he was in NR37. He joined like right after I joined then left mid of our NANWL we had.
Ugg 2ndQF was 18ths name 3 years ago
Ugg 2ndQF was 18ths name 3 years ago
The USMC would rather stay in League 2 for this season if possibleNo
Community Name: [1erPLG]Szwol_FireboyDenied
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198046697515/
Regiment: 1erPLG
Why do you want to be a referee? I have some free time while i'm on break so I want to help out and see this league succeed for another season.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I have had experience refing a bunch of the TNWL 1v1s, I will enforce all the rules, and will not show favouritism or bias.
Admin Experience: NA_Groupfighting, TNWL, some smaller reg servers.
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes
Community Name: [1erPLG]Szwol_FireboyDenied
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198046697515/
Regiment: 1erPLG
Why do you want to be a referee? I have some free time while i'm on break so I want to help out and see this league succeed for another season.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I have had experience refing a bunch of the TNWL 1v1s, I will enforce all the rules, and will not show favouritism or bias.
Admin Experience: NA_Groupfighting, TNWL, some smaller reg servers.
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes
Community Name: [18th]Pvt_Sleek
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/sleekcrush
Regiment: 18th Royal Irish Regiment
Why do you want to be a referee?: I noticed the post that Cheesy posted saying that it would be helpful to have more referee's/admins to help out this large event.
Why do you think you would be a good referee?: I have been an admin in plenty of events including the NANWL in one of the earlier season's for a period of time until I left to take time off from this game. I believe that I did a thorough job and wish to continue this if possible.
Admin Experience: A lot (NANWL, NA_Groupfighting, Groupfighting_Server, Event servers, etc.)
Did you read all the rules thoroughly?: I have
Will you admin fairly and unbiased?: I will
Russian fury, are you involved in the administration at all for this league?Go guess for yourself Gluk the walrus.
Would be nice to know if anyones getting unbanned, pretty sure everyone on the ban list has been banned long enough don't you think?Do you know the definition of the word ban my friend?
Do you know the definition of unbanned my friend?Would be nice to know if anyones getting unbanned, pretty sure everyone on the ban list has been banned long enough don't you think?Do you know the definition of the word ban my friend?
Of course Russian is part of the administration #71stTakeoverRussian fury, are you involved in the administration at all for this league?Go guess for yourself Gluk the walrus.Spoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKjxFJfcrcA[close]
What is that word?Do you know the definition of unbanned my friend?Would be nice to know if anyones getting unbanned, pretty sure everyone on the ban list has been banned long enough don't you think?Do you know the definition of the word ban my friend?
guess I made you look pretty stupid then huh...step up your vocabWhat is that word?Do you know the definition of unbanned my friend?Would be nice to know if anyones getting unbanned, pretty sure everyone on the ban list has been banned long enough don't you think?Do you know the definition of the word ban my friend?
I do not believe that is in my vocabulary.
Bullying is wrongguess I made you look pretty stupid then huh...step up your vocabWhat is that word?Do you know the definition of unbanned my friend?Would be nice to know if anyones getting unbanned, pretty sure everyone on the ban list has been banned long enough don't you think?Do you know the definition of the word ban my friend?
I do not believe that is in my vocabulary.
There's honestly only three that deserve an unban, Rest will basically do it again especially Rico he hops more regs then anyone else.
1. Rafael
2. John Sanders
3. Bill The Butcher
I still have no idea, not sure if you're joking or not. It says no where on the thread so i have no fucking clue.Russian fury, are you involved in the administration at all for this league?Go guess for yourself Gluk the walrus.Spoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKjxFJfcrcA[close]
none of us are, except Cheesey, but pls don't give orders to what we can or cannot do pls and ty.I still have no idea, not sure if you're joking or not. It says no where on the thread so i have no fucking clue.Russian fury, are you involved in the administration at all for this league?Go guess for yourself Gluk the walrus.Spoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKjxFJfcrcA[close]
*sigh* I would appreciate it, (and this goes for all of the 71st) if you would not take this as an indicator that you can do whatever you want on NANWL. Don't post "denied" if you aren't involved in the administration, and if you are involved in the administration then please inform people that you are. It would also be nice that when i ask a serious question, i do not get a bullshit response, thanks.
"I would appreciate it, (and this goes for all of the 71st) if you would not take this as an indicator that you can do whatever you want on NANWL." This is all i'm saying, I don't mean to "give orders."none of us are, except Cheesey, but pls don't give orders to what we can or cannot do pls and ty.I still have no idea, not sure if you're joking or not. It says no where on the thread so i have no fucking clue.Russian fury, are you involved in the administration at all for this league?Go guess for yourself Gluk the walrus.Spoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKjxFJfcrcA[close]
*sigh* I would appreciate it, (and this goes for all of the 71st) if you would not take this as an indicator that you can do whatever you want on NANWL. Don't post "denied" if you aren't involved in the administration, and if you are involved in the administration then please inform people that you are. It would also be nice that when i ask a serious question, i do not get a bullshit response, thanks.
I think your request is... Denied"I would appreciate it, (and this goes for all of the 71st) if you would not take this as an indicator that you can do whatever you want on NANWL." This is all i'm saying, I don't mean to "give orders."none of us are, except Cheesey, but pls don't give orders to what we can or cannot do pls and ty.I still have no idea, not sure if you're joking or not. It says no where on the thread so i have no fucking clue.Russian fury, are you involved in the administration at all for this league?Go guess for yourself Gluk the walrus.Spoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKjxFJfcrcA[close]
*sigh* I would appreciate it, (and this goes for all of the 71st) if you would not take this as an indicator that you can do whatever you want on NANWL. Don't post "denied" if you aren't involved in the administration, and if you are involved in the administration then please inform people that you are. It would also be nice that when i ask a serious question, i do not get a bullshit response, thanks.
John has asked me to post this as of course, he cannot at the moment. Although i believe he is appealing for his unban or something another.
Community Name: John Price
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198013207781/
Regiment: 8. Leib (1st Brandenburgisches) Infanterie-Regiment
Why do you want to be a referee? I have reff'd both sides (EU+NA) of the NWL for years now and with little complaints. I enjoy it and have nothing better to do with my time!
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I am very experienced, leading regiments for over 3 years now aswell while hosting linebattles for 2 of those. Played in every season of EU NWL aswell.
Admin Experience: 83rd, 18e and 8teLeib Servers and events. EU & NA NWL Servers, 84e_Siege.. Too many to state really. Also some PW Servers including RCC and Oasis (Any ooooold players will remember RCC back in the day.)
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Indeederino Frienderino. FroFro Will keep me updated on any changes etc.
Will you admin fairly and unbiased?
ref applications?? ? ?? ? /??? /
There's honestly only three that deserve an unban, Rest will basically do it again especially Rico he hops more regs then anyone else.
1. Rafael
2. John Sanders
3. Bill The Butcher
I don't deserve an unban? :'(
Edit: I was told by JackieChan that I would be unbanned for next season but I suppose since he isnt here anymore that it is up to the new moderators hope they will keep that in mind.
I am still waiting to be denied or accepted.? I'm sorry to be a bother but with chantakey trying to ensure my reg cannot come, I believe my app was overlooked.]
No. That may be a true statement about the old me. But the new me is a nice guy who wants to do NANWL without fuckboys like you getting in my way.
There's honestly only three that deserve an unban, Rest will basically do it again especially Rico he hops more regs then anyone else.
1. Rafael
2. John Sanders
3. Bill The Butcher
There's honestly only three that deserve an unban, Rest will basically do it again especially Rico he hops more regs then anyone else.
1. Rafael
2. John Sanders
3. Bill The Butcher
I don't deserve an unban? :'(
Edit: I was told by JackieChan that I would be unbanned for next season but I suppose since he isnt here anymore that it is up to the new moderators hope they will keep that in mind.
What exactly happened when you got banned? I don't really know much about you.
I Think most of the band should be forgiven honestly i wish NWL would go in a new direction and not be so uptight and selective i think most regiments if they can bring 15+ should be accepted.The Reason U or Vonex Haven't Got Accepted Yet Is Because Chessey Is Busy Right Now So Can You Just Chill and Wait Serveral Days!
No. That may be a true statement about the old me. But the new me is a nice guy who wants to do NANWL without fuckboys like you getting in my way.
I Think most of the band should be forgiven honestly i wish NWL would go in a new direction and not be so uptight and selective i think most regiments if they can bring 15+ should be accepted.The Reason U or Vonex Haven't Got Accepted Yet Is Because Chessey Is Busy Right Now So Can You Just Chill and Wait Serveral Days!
I Think most of the band should be forgiven honestly i wish NWL would go in a new direction and not be so uptight and selective i think most regiments if they can bring 15+ should be accepted.They tried that in previous seasons but regiments kept disbanding, giving random byes that dragged on the league past when it should have been.
And to make matters worse, Windflower, the SIC, has been on vacation, but the good knews is that on the 30th both him and Cheese will be back and able to start the league. I know the community has been patient, and we all need to just continue using the most important virtue and be patient for the moderators return. Cheesey most certainly thanks all of you for showing the good side of the NA community on this thread and with the startings of this league.Amen!
And to make matters worse, Windflower, the SIC, has been on vacation, but the good knews is that on the 30th both him and Cheese will be back and able to start the league. I know the community has been patient, and we all need to just continue using the most important virtue and be patient for the moderators return. Cheesey most certainly thanks all of you for showing the good side of the NA community on this thread and with the startings of this league.Amen!
Feel like I should show some support here even if my opinion doesn't count anymore. Of all the people put on the ban list Maccle is the only one I would unban. Minor rulebreak which was punished with a ban because of a crackdown on double-reging. All others had rather major rulebreaks which warranted their bans. In any case, good luck with this and you can ignore this comment if you like.There's honestly only three that deserve an unban, Rest will basically do it again especially Rico he hops more regs then anyone else.
1. Rafael
2. John Sanders
3. Bill The Butcher
I don't deserve an unban? :'(
Edit: I was told by JackieChan that I would be unbanned for next season but I suppose since he isnt here anymore that it is up to the new moderators hope they will keep that in mind.
What exactly happened when you got banned? I don't really know much about you.
I played for the USMC in a USMC vs PSG match last season when the regiment I was in was not participating in TNWL thats the short of the story I was a little bit more sneaky then that I used another name ect.
everyone ignore jackie. He is irrelevantFeel like I should show some support here even if my opinion doesn't count anymore. Of all the people put on the ban list Maccle is the only one I would unban. Minor rulebreak which was punished with a ban because of a crackdown on double-reging. All others had rather major rulebreaks which warranted their bans. In any case, good luck with this and you can ignore this comment if you like.There's honestly only three that deserve an unban, Rest will basically do it again especially Rico he hops more regs then anyone else.
1. Rafael
2. John Sanders
3. Bill The Butcher
I don't deserve an unban? :'(
Edit: I was told by JackieChan that I would be unbanned for next season but I suppose since he isnt here anymore that it is up to the new moderators hope they will keep that in mind.
What exactly happened when you got banned? I don't really know much about you.
I played for the USMC in a USMC vs PSG match last season when the regiment I was in was not participating in TNWL thats the short of the story I was a little bit more sneaky then that I used another name ect.
We didn't sign up did we?
Feel like I should show some support here even if my opinion doesn't count anymore. Of all the people put on the ban list Maccle is the only one I would unban. Minor rulebreak which was punished with a ban because of a crackdown on double-reging. All others had rather major rulebreaks which warranted their bans. In any case, good luck with this and you can ignore this comment if you like.There's honestly only three that deserve an unban, Rest will basically do it again especially Rico he hops more regs then anyone else.
1. Rafael
2. John Sanders
3. Bill The Butcher
I don't deserve an unban? :'(
Edit: I was told by JackieChan that I would be unbanned for next season but I suppose since he isnt here anymore that it is up to the new moderators hope they will keep that in mind.
What exactly happened when you got banned? I don't really know much about you.
I played for the USMC in a USMC vs PSG match last season when the regiment I was in was not participating in TNWL thats the short of the story I was a little bit more sneaky then that I used another name ect.
Feel like I should show some support here even if my opinion doesn't count anymore. Of all the people put on the ban list Maccle is the only one I would unban. Minor rulebreak which was punished with a ban because of a crackdown on double-reging. All others had rather major rulebreaks which warranted their bans. In any case, good luck with this and you can ignore this comment if you like.There's honestly only three that deserve an unban, Rest will basically do it again especially Rico he hops more regs then anyone else.
1. Rafael
2. John Sanders
3. Bill The Butcher
I don't deserve an unban? :'(
Edit: I was told by JackieChan that I would be unbanned for next season but I suppose since he isnt here anymore that it is up to the new moderators hope they will keep that in mind.
What exactly happened when you got banned? I don't really know much about you.
I played for the USMC in a USMC vs PSG match last season when the regiment I was in was not participating in TNWL thats the short of the story I was a little bit more sneaky then that I used another name ect.
Ban list is going to make or break this event. So many of these bans are extremely outdated and it would be ludicrous if they all stay banned.
Remember to look outside of your own interests and try to see what would be good for the community :)Ban list is going to make or break this event. So many of these bans are extremely outdated and it would be ludicrous if they all stay banned.
I would agree with that.
Remember to look outside of your own interests and try to see what would be good for the community :)Ban list is going to make or break this event. So many of these bans are extremely outdated and it would be ludicrous if they all stay banned.
I would agree with that.
Ban list is going to make or break this event. So many of these bans are extremely outdated and it would be ludicrous if they all stay banned.
I would agree with that.
It would make a difference, for example Rafael is senior officer in 111e, and we are short staffed as it is right now. I know other players on the list that have key roles within other regiments as well.
It would make a difference, for example Rafael is senior officer in 111e, and we are short staffed as it is right now. I know other players on the list that have key roles within other regiments as well.
I mean, I tend to be the only officer present in quite a few line battles, while being undermanned (less than 10), so I feel it's very possible to function without 1 senior officer.
Are you accusing the 71st of controlling a league when your own regiment controls your league? Enough of that, pleaseRemember to look outside of your own interests and try to see what would be good for the community :)Ban list is going to make or break this event. So many of these bans are extremely outdated and it would be ludicrous if they all stay banned.
I would agree with that.
Aka banning players the 71st dislikes as its the only factor being used to judge these people.
Are you accusing the 71st of controlling a league when your own regiment controls your league? Enough of that, pleaseRemember to look outside of your own interests and try to see what would be good for the community :)Ban list is going to make or break this event. So many of these bans are extremely outdated and it would be ludicrous if they all stay banned.
I would agree with that.
Aka banning players the 71st dislikes as its the only factor being used to judge these people.
I think the administration should hold a meeting where they discuss each individual ban on a case by case basis and come to their conclusions from that.
It would make a difference, for example Rafael is senior officer in 111e, and we are short staffed as it is right now. I know other players on the list that have key roles within other regiments as well.
I mean, I tend to be the only officer present in quite a few line battles, while being undermanned (less than 10), so I feel it's very possible to function without 1 senior officer.
I am talking about 1 officer at all. School will be going by the time this starts and my regiment and others will be affected by this.
P.S. If you have less then 10 in an NWL event the opposing regiment will still be allowed 11 players so you might want to start recruiting. :P
bill got banned for trolling a non nwl match and didn't break any rules
ok.bill got banned for trolling a non nwl match and didn't break any rules
10 men is not a "massive epeen line"It would make a difference, for example Rafael is senior officer in 111e, and we are short staffed as it is right now. I know other players on the list that have key roles within other regiments as well.
I mean, I tend to be the only officer present in quite a few line battles, while being undermanned (less than 10), so I feel it's very possible to function without 1 senior officer.
I am talking about 1 officer at all. School will be going by the time this starts and my regiment and others will be affected by this.
P.S. If you have less then 10 in an NWL event the opposing regiment will still be allowed 11 players so you might want to start recruiting. :P
I know, but we're doing it as a group of friends to have fun, we're not trying to bring a massive epeen line xD
10 men is not a "massive epeen line"It would make a difference, for example Rafael is senior officer in 111e, and we are short staffed as it is right now. I know other players on the list that have key roles within other regiments as well.
I mean, I tend to be the only officer present in quite a few line battles, while being undermanned (less than 10), so I feel it's very possible to function without 1 senior officer.
I am talking about 1 officer at all. School will be going by the time this starts and my regiment and others will be affected by this.
P.S. If you have less then 10 in an NWL event the opposing regiment will still be allowed 11 players so you might want to start recruiting. :P
I know, but we're doing it as a group of friends to have fun, we're not trying to bring a massive epeen line xD
Not sure where you got that from but 10 is the minimum for any respectable event including NANWL. You shouldn't have signed up if you cant take atleast 10 people lol
10 men is not a "massive epeen line"It would make a difference, for example Rafael is senior officer in 111e, and we are short staffed as it is right now. I know other players on the list that have key roles within other regiments as well.
I mean, I tend to be the only officer present in quite a few line battles, while being undermanned (less than 10), so I feel it's very possible to function without 1 senior officer.
I am talking about 1 officer at all. School will be going by the time this starts and my regiment and others will be affected by this.
P.S. If you have less then 10 in an NWL event the opposing regiment will still be allowed 11 players so you might want to start recruiting. :P
I know, but we're doing it as a group of friends to have fun, we're not trying to bring a massive epeen line xD
Not sure where you got that from but 10 is the minimum for any respectable event including NANWL. You shouldn't have signed up if you cant take atleast 10 people lol
I think you misunderstood or I communicated my point wrong. I meant, I'm just doing the event with friends, aka people who are already in my regiment for a while, or people I know in the community who are joining it, I don't have an interest in going out to the pub servers to recruit just to get a bigger line. I can get 10-13 for comp matches, its just not something we bring to 1v1's outside of competitions (cause we just don't care).
This change is much appreciated :DRule Change
The time limit for camping has been reduced from 5 minutes to 3 minutes in an effort to speed up NANWL matches. 5 Minutes may not seem like much to some, but over 10 rounds that adds up to 50 minutes of doing nothing.
New Rule
26. - Camping is naturally allowed, but if rounds take too long and the camping becomes excessive, you will be forced to engage! Excessive camping is considered by us to be holding one position (hill for instance) for 3 minutes! Forcing to engage means, you have to leave your position and get close to your enemy (close volleys or melee). You are NOT allowed to return to that position again that round!
NANWL Staff
(https://i.imgur.com/PlVxOIj.png)
|
I thought we were already in. We signed up on the original thread on page 4 or 5.
edit, here:
Regiment: 3eVolt
Estimated attendance: 15-20
Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/grimsight3e
Accept rules?: Yes
I feel like someone is missing...Cause you too bad for this league!
I feel like someone is missing...Cause you too bad for this league!
(Jk, Cheese forgot about you guys xD)
Regiment: 2e Régiment de Cavalerie Légers Lanciers de la Garde Impériale
Estimated attendance: 15-25
Leader's Steam: [2e]Capt_LES IS MOREx
Accept rules?:yes sir!
Side note the 2e is a reformed version of the 53e idk if it would count as being a year old because of the name change but its all the same players we just swapped from being line to cav in pub events and we still do competitive 1v1s lol.
When does this start btw
No offense or anything, but 80th in League 1...?
Ye.No offense or anything, but 80th in League 1...?
Swap 80th with PSG or 34e.
Karth has returned....light the beacon
Gentlemen, I am sure if the 80th have an issue where they have been placed they can take it up with cheesy. None of you need to be posting about the issue since it really doesn't affect or concern you. Thank you for caring about them but if they have a concern I am sure they have cheesy added and they can send him a message on steam if they have to. Thanks ;DIt does concern us if we're in the same league as the 80th. They aren't at a near high enough level yet to compete with any of the regs in league 1, whereas the PSG is. No one wants them to quit just because they were put into an unfair position where they were given little chance of actually winning, that's what's torn up a lot of the prior seasons of this league.
Gentlemen, I am sure if the 80th have an issue where they have been placed they can take it up with cheesy. None of you need to be posting about the issue since it really doesn't affect or concern you. Thank you for caring about them but if they have a concern I am sure they have cheesy added and they can send him a message on steam if they have to. Thanks ;DIt does concern us if we're in the same league as the 80th. They aren't at a near high enough level yet to compete with any of the regs in league 1, whereas the PSG is. No one wants them to quit just because they were put into an unfair position where they were given little chance of actually winning, that's what's torn up a lot of the prior seasons of this league.
can 71st be league 2?yus
Karth has returned....light the beacon
So, should I repost my urban request or nahAll unban requests are on record, no need.
So, should I repost my urban request or nahAll unban requests are on record, no need.
Regiment:79th "Queens Own" Cameron HighlandersAccepted || Since you came in second place in League 2 of Season 4, you will be placed in League 1.
Estimated attendance:12-16
Leader's Steam:have me
Accept rules?: yes
So gettysburg was nice.isn't that where Lincoln was shot?
ur fucking stupid, he got shot in Dallas, TX in 1963.So gettysburg was nice.isn't that where Lincoln was shot?
buahahahahahaur fucking stupid, he got shot in Dallas, TX in 1963.So gettysburg was nice.isn't that where Lincoln was shot?
ur fucking stupid, he got shot in Dallas, TX in 1963.So gettysburg was nice.isn't that where Lincoln was shot?
nah man i think it was arch duke ferdinandur fucking stupid, he got shot in Dallas, TX in 1963.So gettysburg was nice.isn't that where Lincoln was shot?
I'm pretty sure that was George Washington...
nah man i think it was arch duke ferdinandur fucking stupid, he got shot in Dallas, TX in 1963.So gettysburg was nice.isn't that where Lincoln was shot?
I'm pretty sure that was George Washington...
You are all fucking retarded, it's where george washington and king george III made peace and ended ww1.nah man i think it was arch duke ferdinandur fucking stupid, he got shot in Dallas, TX in 1963.So gettysburg was nice.isn't that where Lincoln was shot?
I'm pretty sure that was George Washington...
Nah fam that was Gandhi
You are all fucking retarded, it's where george washington and king george III made peace and ended 'Nam.nah man i think it was arch duke ferdinandur fucking stupid, he got shot in Dallas, TX in 1963.So gettysburg was nice.isn't that where Lincoln was shot?
I'm pretty sure that was George Washington...
Nah fam that was Gandhi
FixedYou are all fucking retarded, it's where george washington and king george III made peace and ended WW2.nah man i think it was arch duke ferdinandur fucking stupid, he got shot in Dallas, TX in 1963.So gettysburg was nice.isn't that where Lincoln was shot?
I'm pretty sure that was George Washington...
Nah fam that was Gandhi
Wow. One mistake. Fixed it.
Unfortunately, 16thCS's enthusiasm for NW has hit an all time low, as such we regrettably have to pull from this and any other competition. Sorry about this, I didn't think our desire to play would drop like that :/At least before league started.
Unfortunately, 16thCS's enthusiasm for NW has hit an all time low, as such we regrettably have to pull from this and any other competition. Sorry about this, I didn't think our desire to play would drop like that :/At least before league started.
shit reg, i hope u cri at night, drink ur maple syrup tearsUnfortunately, 16thCS's enthusiasm for NW has hit an all time low, as such we regrettably have to pull from this and any other competition. Sorry about this, I didn't think our desire to play would drop like that :/At least before league started.
Yeah, that's why I announced it now, so it wouldn't inconvenience the league
shit reg, i hope u cri at night, drink ur maple syrup tearsUnfortunately, 16thCS's enthusiasm for NW has hit an all time low, as such we regrettably have to pull from this and any other competition. Sorry about this, I didn't think our desire to play would drop like that :/At least before league started.
Yeah, that's why I announced it now, so it wouldn't inconvenience the league
So someone refresh my memory here, when does this start again? ;)
so never. Isis doesn't give people backSo someone refresh my memory here, when does this start again? ;)
When ISIS gives Karth back
So someone refresh my memory here, when does this start again? ;)
Has all the ref applications been accepted?Not yet, no.
The Following Referee applications have been approved:SpoilerCommunity Name: Theodin.
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198054775113
Regiment: 71st
Why do you want to be a veteran referee?Well, I have a lot of experience in reffing, having over two seasons reffing experience in NANWL. I have admin on NA groupfighting, Public Duel NA, and many regimental servers, while also hosting my own tournament. I have a ton of experience with the community and regiments in general, and am a server moderator on NA Groupfighting. Many regiments routinely ask me to ref 1v1s or help with NANWL rules. I am responsible and the most responsible, respected members of the community trust and respect me.
Why do you think you would be a good veteran referee?Well, if you had asked me 2 months ago, I would have no answer, but I have become mature and responsible with being a NA GF moderator. Handling people unhappy with my decisions have become routine, and I do not conform for anybody, as well as being non biased.
Admin Experience:NA Groupfighting moderator/admin, Public Duel NA, 63e 34e 15th York 30th 52nd HL Nr7 NANWL servers. + more I can't fully remember.
Did you read all the rules thoroughly?Yes.
Will you admin fairly and unbiased?Yes.
Community Name: Windflower
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/windflower1
Regiment: Pontifical Swiss Guard
Why do you want to be a referee? I've been a referee in the past and I'd like nothing more than to be one again, I like helping the community in whatever way I can and I enjoy it as well.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I'm experienced with reffing and I'm not biased towards any regiment or player. I tend to be more lenient when I ref and I try to make fair choices to the best of my abilities.
Admin Experience: NANWL Season 4 Ref, TNWL Ref, Public Duel NA Admin, NANWGL Head Organizer, 5v5 NA Groupfighting Tournament Head Organizer
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes.
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes.
Community Name: Orcaryo
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/orcaryo/
Regiment: 42nd
Why do you want to be a referee? I was a ref in the old NANWL ran by Zzehth and Jackie. Want to see and help it make a comeback
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I was a ref for the old NANWL, reffed many 1v1s. Ran a couple of LBs for a period of time. Since I am not in a reg in this, I will be unbiased.
Admin Experience: NA1 and NA GFing admin, admined a couple of events. Reffed 1v1s as well
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes
Community Name: [18th]Pvt_Sleek
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/sleekcrush
Regiment: 18th Royal Irish Regiment
Why do you want to be a referee?: I noticed the post that Cheesy posted saying that it would be helpful to have more referee's/admins to help out this large event.
Why do you think you would be a good referee?: I have been an admin in plenty of events including the NANWL in one of the earlier season's for a period of time until I left to take time off from this game. I believe that I did a thorough job and wish to continue this if possible.
Admin Experience: A lot (NANWL, NA_Groupfighting, Groupfighting_Server, Event servers, etc.)
Did you read all the rules thoroughly?: I have
Will you admin fairly and unbiased?: I will
Community Name: [1erPLG]Szwol_Fireboy
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198046697515/
Regiment: 1erPLG
Why do you want to be a referee? I have some free time while i'm on break so I want to help out and see this league succeed for another season.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I have had experience refing a bunch of the TNWL 1v1s, I will enforce all the rules, and will not show favouritism or bias.
Admin Experience: NA_Groupfighting, TNWL, some smaller reg servers.
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes[close]
More to come!
sleek, a ref? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Not all ref applications will be accepted or denied, a lot will be left until we can further access their ability to be a ref.alright.
But we will have more ref applications accepted in the next few days.
Community Name: GlukTheWalrus
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/58e_Gluk/
Regiment: 58e
Why do you want to be a referee?: Was a ref last season
Why do you think you would be a good referee?: I'm unbias and will ref events whenever asked to
Admin Experience: NANWL, TNWL, Public Duel/CB, 1erGren Tournament, couple other things
Did you read all the rules thoroughly?: Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased?: Yes
Thanks babe.Community Name: GlukTheWalrus
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/58e_Gluk/
Regiment: 58e
Why do you want to be a referee?: Was a ref last season
Why do you think you would be a good referee?: I'm unbias and will ref events whenever asked to
Admin Experience: NANWL, TNWL, Public Duel/CB, 1erGren Tournament, couple other things
Did you read all the rules thoroughly?: Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased?: Yes
Accepted
Thank you for informing us before the league has started
Thank you for informing us before the league has started
80th merged into the 45e.
I believe they should be In league 1 since they have alot of good players.Wot, but okay wherever is cool aslong as we in :D
A decision on the Nr37 will be made tonight, and everything else should be ready for tomorrow's start as well.Yeah I can understand that, I can say we won't disband but who knows, I could die tonight. Whatever your decision is we will respect it and if not this season, be ready for next season!
As a courtesy to the Nr37, I will tell you ahead of time not to hold onto too much hope. You guys literally just reformed, making you highly likely to disband in our eyes.
Except 3e was good, we're shit D:
Oh and like the USMC is pulling out of this league. Sorry
#pulloutgametoostrong
Oh and like the USMC is pulling out of this league. Sorry
#pulloutgametoostrong
Guess whos my new punching bag :)Oh and like the USMC is pulling out of this league. Sorry
#pulloutgametoostrong
but you got me pregnant
Spoilerhttps://youtu.be/gbt61vcAkG0[close]
I think 34e should have been league 1#EmoUnbanned = 34e season 1 ? YES
They identify as a competitive regiment and aren't inept at 1v1s
I think 34e should have been league 1#EmoUnbanned = 34e league 1 ? YES
They identify as a competitive regiment and aren't inept at 1v1s
Community Name: The Red Viper
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/newgangster1812/
Regiment: 34e Gren
Why do you want to be a referee? Because I have reffed NWL matches before and TNWL matches so I would like to continue reffing for this league because I enjoy watching the regiments engage and also to help out other refs if they cant ref the matches because of other events
Why do you think you would be a good referee? Because I have reffed for this league before and also have reffed for TNWL
Admin Experience: NWL, TNWL, NA GF, PW Oasis, PW Evora, 2nd KGL Pub LB
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes
I think 34e should have been league 134e isn't That good ;)
They identify as a competitive regiment and aren't inept at 1v1s
Community Name: Modernassassin+1
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Modernassassin315
Regiment: 79th "Queens Own" Cameron Highlanders
Why do you want to be a referee? I would like to help out this league and I think people in this community know I'm unbiased and a calm person.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I have no outstanding problems with any regiment in this league and i'm a veteran of this game
Admin Experience: Besides my own server i admined 7NA GroupFighting
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Of Course
4 regiments in a league lol. Seems kinda dumb.these niggas dont need us fam.
Pretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close]
Under a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close]
Congrats though. I just cant bring myself to play as much as I use to and I really hope I dont come back. I wanna smash again when the time is right. ;)Under a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close]
JackieChan is NANWL's newest moderator!not surprised.
As I am not surprised you guys disbanded before 1v1ing us again.JackieChan is NANWL's newest moderator!not surprised.
1stFL 4 lifeUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close]
Yeah, lets just BM the only regiment that would 1v1 you. Cheesey, I took you for an intelligent leader. Not a dumb one.As I am not surprised you guys disbanded before 1v1ing us again.JackieChan is NANWL's newest moderator!not surprised.
He ran the league before.
Yeah, lets just BM the only regiment that would 1v1 you. Cheesey, I took you for an intelligent leader. Not a dumb one.As I am not surprised you guys disbanded before 1v1ing us again.JackieChan is NANWL's newest moderator!not surprised.
He ran the league before.
Make sure you put that egotistical picture at the end of everyone of your posts. It makes you look more...official.
We couldnt bring ourselves to plow you into the ground one more time. We were just to damn exhausted.Yeah, lets just BM the only regiment that would 1v1 you. Cheesey, I took you for an intelligent leader. Not a dumb one.As I am not surprised you guys disbanded before 1v1ing us again.JackieChan is NANWL's newest moderator!not surprised.
He ran the league before.
Make sure you put that egotistical picture at the end of everyone of your posts. It makes you look more...official.
That picture was used far before I took over.
Stay off this thread Alex, you have no part in NANWL anymore.
We couldnt bring ourselves to plow you into the ground one more time. We were just to damn exhausted.Yeah, lets just BM the only regiment that would 1v1 you. Cheesey, I took you for an intelligent leader. Not a dumb one.As I am not surprised you guys disbanded before 1v1ing us again.JackieChan is NANWL's newest moderator!not surprised.
He ran the league before.
Make sure you put that egotistical picture at the end of everyone of your posts. It makes you look more...official.
That picture was used far before I took over.
Stay off this thread Alex, you have no part in NANWL anymore.
I've noticed that everytime i engage in an argument with cheesey, his brother runs to aid him.
We couldnt bring ourselves to plow you into the ground one more time. We were just to damn exhausted.Yeah, lets just BM the only regiment that would 1v1 you. Cheesey, I took you for an intelligent leader. Not a dumb one.As I am not surprised you guys disbanded before 1v1ing us again.JackieChan is NANWL's newest moderator!not surprised.
He ran the league before.
Make sure you put that egotistical picture at the end of everyone of your posts. It makes you look more...official.
That picture was used far before I took over.
Stay off this thread Alex, you have no part in NANWL anymore.
I've noticed that everytime i engage in an argument with cheesey, his brother runs to aid him.
They use teamwork to jump on jackie chans back. A human made ladder.We couldnt bring ourselves to plow you into the ground one more time. We were just to damn exhausted.Yeah, lets just BM the only regiment that would 1v1 you. Cheesey, I took you for an intelligent leader. Not a dumb one.As I am not surprised you guys disbanded before 1v1ing us again.JackieChan is NANWL's newest moderator!not surprised.
He ran the league before.
Make sure you put that egotistical picture at the end of everyone of your posts. It makes you look more...official.
That picture was used far before I took over.
Stay off this thread Alex, you have no part in NANWL anymore.
I've noticed that everytime i engage in an argument with cheesey, his brother runs to aid him.
71st use teamwork in the game and on the forums
kek
THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close]
That's like calling the 58e, the Nr37THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close]
That's like calling the 58e, the Nr37THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close]
I'm looking to join the mute crew. But, as you can see, the organizers of this even cant get real unprofessional really fast like.SpoilerThat's like calling the 58e, the Nr37THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close][close]
It was the 35th as well as the 1stFL. Mockingjay lead the 35th and the 1stFL as well as the PSG before handing it over to StJohn and I. :)
Now if you don't take part in this league I suggest to not post on this thread any longer to prevent any unneeded conflict
I'm looking to join the mute crew. But, as you can see, the organizers of this even cant get real unprofessional really fast like.SpoilerThat's like calling the 58e, the Nr37THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close][close]
It was the 35th as well as the 1stFL. Mockingjay lead the 35th and the 1stFL as well as the PSG before handing it over to StJohn and I. :)
Now if you don't take part in this league I suggest to not post on this thread any longer to prevent any unneeded conflict
kay. ill post here when i want.I'm looking to join the mute crew. But, as you can see, the organizers of this even cant get real unprofessional really fast like.SpoilerThat's like calling the 58e, the Nr37THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close][close]
It was the 35th as well as the 1stFL. Mockingjay lead the 35th and the 1stFL as well as the PSG before handing it over to StJohn and I. :)
Now if you don't take part in this league I suggest to not post on this thread any longer to prevent any unneeded conflict
Stay off this thread, you are only looking to cause problems.
As suprising as it is for you guys to keep running with that as someone who was in those 2 regiments you of all people should be able to spot the MANY differences between the 35th and the PSG
That's like calling the 58e, the Nr37THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close]
Lol you didnt run the 1stFL, Pickle, Mockingjerk and I did. You were an NCO i thinkSpoilerThat's like calling the 58e, the Nr37THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close][close]
It was the 35th as well as the 1stFL. Mockingjay lead the 35th and the 1stFL as well as the PSG before handing it over to StJohn and I. :)
Now if you don't take part in this league I suggest to not post on this thread any longer to prevent any unneeded conflict
1stFL 4 lifeUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close]
The keyboard warrior. Watch out, he can type.kay. ill post here when i want.I'm looking to join the mute crew. But, as you can see, the organizers of this even cant get real unprofessional really fast like.SpoilerThat's like calling the 58e, the Nr37THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close][close]
It was the 35th as well as the 1stFL. Mockingjay lead the 35th and the 1stFL as well as the PSG before handing it over to StJohn and I. :)
Now if you don't take part in this league I suggest to not post on this thread any longer to prevent any unneeded conflict
Stay off this thread, you are only looking to cause problems.
why dont you go back a few pages on your own thread. Keyboard warrior.The keyboard warrior. Watch out, he can type.kay. ill post here when i want.I'm looking to join the mute crew. But, as you can see, the organizers of this even cant get real unprofessional really fast like.SpoilerThat's like calling the 58e, the Nr37THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close][close]
It was the 35th as well as the 1stFL. Mockingjay lead the 35th and the 1stFL as well as the PSG before handing it over to StJohn and I. :)
Now if you don't take part in this league I suggest to not post on this thread any longer to prevent any unneeded conflict
Stay off this thread, you are only looking to cause problems.
Why don't you talk in TS at least cause last time you were scared to talk over a mic. And sent in a squad of 5th to talk to us instead of youOh, i'm never scared of a good arguement over Teamspeak. I dont remember this, but if it did happen it would be very smart to unban someone from your ts.hmu when arckilligan join the 71st, heard you guys sucked him off for a good while too.
Dont lie please you arent banned. I cant steam the IP to you as you un-added me cause you had trouble typing back.Why don't you talk in TS at least cause last time you were scared to talk over a mic. And sent in a squad of 5th to talk to us instead of youOh, i'm never scared of a good arguement over Teamspeak. I dont remember this, but if it did happen it would be very smart to unban someone from your ts.hmu when arckilligan join the 71st, heard you guys sucked him off for a good while too.
oh and calm down you keyboard warrior.
You banned the whole 5th when we left your regiment respectfully saying "we dont enjoy having PTS and being told to shut up all the time" and because of the CSjt controversy.Dont lie please you arent banned. I cant steam the IP to you as you un-added me cause you had trouble typing back.Why don't you talk in TS at least cause last time you were scared to talk over a mic. And sent in a squad of 5th to talk to us instead of youOh, i'm never scared of a good arguement over Teamspeak. I dont remember this, but if it did happen it would be very smart to unban someone from your ts.hmu when arckilligan join the 71st, heard you guys sucked him off for a good while too.
oh and calm down you keyboard warrior.
Please stop posting here as Cheesey said, you arent apart of this league anymore cause you disbanded(again), you can re-add me on steam if you want or talk in ts to continue this great conversation.You banned the whole 5th when we left your regiment respectfully saying "we dont enjoy having PTS and being told to shut up all the time" and because of the CSjt controversy.Dont lie please you arent banned. I cant steam the IP to you as you un-added me cause you had trouble typing back.Why don't you talk in TS at least cause last time you were scared to talk over a mic. And sent in a squad of 5th to talk to us instead of youOh, i'm never scared of a good arguement over Teamspeak. I dont remember this, but if it did happen it would be very smart to unban someone from your ts.hmu when arckilligan join the 71st, heard you guys sucked him off for a good while too.
oh and calm down you keyboard warrior.
you prolonged the argument and now you want me to stop.Please stop posting here as Cheesey said, you arent apart of this league anymore cause you disbanded(again), you can re-add me on steam if you want or talk in ts to continue this great conversation.You banned the whole 5th when we left your regiment respectfully saying "we dont enjoy having PTS and being told to shut up all the time" and because of the CSjt controversy.Dont lie please you arent banned. I cant steam the IP to you as you un-added me cause you had trouble typing back.Why don't you talk in TS at least cause last time you were scared to talk over a mic. And sent in a squad of 5th to talk to us instead of youOh, i'm never scared of a good arguement over Teamspeak. I dont remember this, but if it did happen it would be very smart to unban someone from your ts.hmu when arckilligan join the 71st, heard you guys sucked him off for a good while too.
oh and calm down you keyboard warrior.
Please stop posting here as Cheesey said, you arent apart of this league anymore cause you disbanded(again), you can re-add me on steam if you want or talk in ts to continue this great conversation.You banned the whole 5th when we left your regiment respectfully saying "we dont enjoy having PTS and being told to shut up all the time" and because of the CSjt controversy.Dont lie please you arent banned. I cant steam the IP to you as you un-added me cause you had trouble typing back.Why don't you talk in TS at least cause last time you were scared to talk over a mic. And sent in a squad of 5th to talk to us instead of youOh, i'm never scared of a good arguement over Teamspeak. I dont remember this, but if it did happen it would be very smart to unban someone from your ts.hmu when arckilligan join the 71st, heard you guys sucked him off for a good while too.
oh and calm down you keyboard warrior.
(https://i.imgur.com/mtl4WZ6.png?1)
get it?
58e isn't Nr37 Without Waste :PThat's like calling the 58e, the Nr37THE PSG IS NOT THE 35TH DAMNITUnder a different namePretty sure PSG wasnt around during Season 1SpoilerShoutout to the 63e and PSG for being the only regiments to stay in NWL since Season 1 8)[close]
58e Season 3 League 2 champions
The 5th members were never banned you guys all just left, and they aren't allowed to join back because they left.I'll leave when I want to. Some advice, if you dont give me a reason to come back, I wont come back. Do you want to hear my justification for not putting the 5th losses on our record? Or are you just acting like a hard ass, keyboard warrior like your little brother.
You love to make shit up to back up your point of view. Such as "75th 2 time champs", yet the 75th only won TNWL? Oh you must be talking about the 5th winning League 2 of NANWL, well then why don't all of the 5th's many losses count as well? You can't pick what about the 5th applies to the 75th, its either you take all the wins and all the losses, or not at all.
You have been asked to stay off this thread numerous times, no one wants you here.
Until the mods make you leave. ::) ::)You're so stupid. I'm the king, I left. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Now go back to doing what you do best, getting kicked out of your own regiment by your own members.
Until the mods make you leave. ::) ::)You're so stupid. I'm the king, I left. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Now go back to doing what you do best, getting kicked out of your own regiment by your own members.
54th were long dead, you guys....Until the mods make you leave. ::) ::)You're so stupid. I'm the king, I left. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Now go back to doing what you do best, getting kicked out of your own regiment by your own members.
That explains why you went into the 54th teamspeak crying. ;)
That explains why former 54th members have told me this story while dying laughing.I bet they did. Explains alot that when we 7-1ed them that they were raging in chat so uncharacteristically.
That explains why former 54th members have told me this story while dying laughing.I bet they did. Explains alot that when we 7-1ed them that they were raging in chat so uncharacteristically.
Cant we all be friends and get back on the topic on NANWL.You give me a reason to come back and I'll come back.
Community Name: Modernassassin?
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Modernassassin315
Regiment: 79th "Queens Own" Cameron Highlanders
Why do you want to be a referee? I would like to help out this league and I think people in this community know I'm unbiased and a calm person.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I have no outstanding problems with any regiment in this league and i'm a veteran of this game
Admin Experience: Besides my own server i admined 7NA GroupFighting
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Of Course
Tfw the head organizer trolls people and tries to antagonize while also saying stop lmao...;D
Check who posted first.When will you learn?
If you are not in the league do not post here, that goes for both of you.
Stop it, next post to continue flaming gets a mute!do it. no balls
Check who posted first.When i said I was not surprised I did not mean it as an admin bias "threat" like many other brain dead folk. I meant it because when people quit things in NW, they slowly come back. All.The.Time.
If you are not in the league do not post here, that goes for both of you.
f0resti want him to be good again :'(
This isn't a CSGO thread, get off.f0resti want him to be good again :'(
Fuck off.This isn't a CSGO thread, get off.f0resti want him to be good again :'(
Keyboard warriorFuck off.This isn't a CSGO thread, get off.f0resti want him to be good again :'(
apple doesnt fall far from the tree. Unfortunately, you're not as ripe as your younger brother. go get high with him and ask him for advice since you're a badass.Keyboard warriorFuck off.This isn't a CSGO thread, get off.f0resti want him to be good again :'(
What is this.Just the
Agh.
1v1ing the 34e tonight, gnnna be on our server at 9PM EST. Windflower will be reffing.we 1v1ing tonight what???
Is it too late to sign up a regiment?
Time to watch a bunch of League 2 regiments get 10-0'd by League 1.
Time to watch a bunch of League 2 regiments get 10-0'd by League 1.
Time to watch a bunch of League 2 regiments get 10-0'd by League 1.
34e 6 - 4 4th
Good Match.34e 6 - 4 4th
Good match.
Time to watch a bunch of League 2 regiments get 10-0'd by League 1.
58e vs LIR sunday
Need ref
If Jorge isn't streaming tonights match, I will, after I confirm from both leaders that they don't mind out of courtesy.pls stream you are legend
http://www.twitch.tv/tmixtv
PSG vs. 2ySG
***just kidding, Morning of the 2ySG has asked me not to.. ???
Match you need a deadline extention for: LIR vs 58e
Why do you need a deadline extention?: Jetch will not be present this sunday
How long would you like this extention to be?: A week
If Jorge isn't streaming tonights match, I will, after I confirm from both leaders that they don't mind out of courtesy.did u stream?
http://www.twitch.tv/tmixtv
PSG vs. 2ySG
***just kidding, Morning of the 2ySG has asked me not to.. ???
No, I asked in chat if it was okay and the 2ySG didn't want it to be. I'll be streaming whatever I can in the future if both leaders agree.did u stream?SpoilerIf Jorge isn't streaming tonights match, I will, after I confirm from both leaders that they don't mind out of courtesy.
http://www.twitch.tv/tmixtv
PSG vs. 2ySG
***just kidding, Morning of the 2ySG has asked me not to.. ???[close]
Name: BillTheBucher
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/thebutcherbill
Regiment: 58eme
Date when banned: Early Season 3
Name the rule/s you broke: Not a specified rule
How did you break this/these rule/s?: Trolled a regimental server and banned the players
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: Yes
yeaName: BillTheBucher
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/thebutcherbill
Regiment: 58eme
Date when banned: Early Season 3
Name the rule/s you broke: Not a specified rule
How did you break this/these rule/s?: Trolled a regimental server and banned the players
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: Yes
pl0x
Is 1stRI leader accurate?Sorry, fixed!
yeaName: BillTheBucher
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/thebutcherbill
Regiment: 58eme
Date when banned: Early Season 3
Name the rule/s you broke: Not a specified rule
How did you break this/these rule/s?: Trolled a regimental server and banned the players
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: Yes
pl0x
GG guys sorry I could not attend being that I'm still banned. after many MONTHS and missing the entire last season still banned
GG guys sorry I could not attend being that I'm still banned. after many MONTHS and missing the entire last season still banned
BillTheBanned nvr 4gt
1stRI have been removed from the league for refusing to play some NANWL matches, all matches involving them will be just be treated as bye weeks. The 71st's forfeit win against them will be removed.Rip(https://i.imgur.com/PlVxOIj.png)
GG guys sorry I could not attend being that I'm still banned. after many MONTHS and missing the entire last season still banned
BillTheBanned nvr 4gt
I told you to come speak to me about it yesterday.
1stRI have been removed from the league for refusing to play some NANWL matches, all matches involving them will be just be treated as bye weeks. The 71st's forfeit win against them will be removed.Rip(https://i.imgur.com/PlVxOIj.png)
So uh when are y'all accepting and denying ref apps? Cause like 70% of the applications have just been ignored3 referee applications is not 70%.
Flower he is also talking about the ones on the other NWL threadSo uh when are y'all accepting and denying ref apps? Cause like 70% of the applications have just been ignored3 referee applications is not 70%.
71st vs 2ySG this Saturday on 71st_Official @8pm EST!
We need a ref.
So, should I repost my urban request or nahAll unban requests are on record, no need.
Alright, when can we expect verdicts?
71st vs 2ySG this Saturday on 71st_Official @8pm EST!
We need a ref.
I'll look at my schedule and try to ref it.
firebad almost at 2k posts :o71st vs 2ySG this Saturday on 71st_Official @8pm EST!
We need a ref.
I'll look at my schedule and try to ref it.
I should also be available
4th Vs. PSG Should be sunday at 8PM EST.
right before the officer died it looks like he is running at the line. If I was a ref I would probably call it as a charge. But I'm not a ref for a reason...It's fine, i can see this going both ways.
edit:the more I watch this, the more I think of it as OA. im too indecisive. :(
I want some judgement on this. This was an unofficial 1v1 (thank god) but this could be interpreted in so many ways. Basically our line was running up to volley them with a good angle (angle showing that the intention was to form a line and not to immediately charge but giving us the option to charge if we liked), the line was a bit clumped however. They thought we were charging and our officer dies. It only really looks like a charge until AFTER the officer dies. I'll also note that we have been doing these point blank volleys the entire event. This caused a huge debate within the 1v1. Now you might think this "well he switched to melee before the officer died, therefore the intention was a charge" but the reason is because i often switch back and forth from melee to shooting in 1v1s when i'm bored and nothing is happening (whether you believe me or not is up to you). The question then is this, if you were referee of this event, how would you call it? From my perspective it was OA, from their perspective it was a charge and therefore valid (even though they had a slight FoC). This is just one of those weird moments where the call could go either way and you may never be sure that it was the right call.
(https://i.gyazo.com/39f1177693f0c1dabad9e68542433593.gif)
Is it caused that much of a problem id simply have them redo the roundthat's what we requested, which resulted in the argument which is why i posted it here to get people's opinion on it.
Not gonna lie if they were getting lined up to shoot that was a pretty shite lineSpoilerI want some judgement on this. This was an unofficial 1v1 (thank god) but this could be interpreted in so many ways. Basically our line was running up to volley them with a good angle (angle showing that the intention was to form a line and not to immediately charge but giving us the option to charge if we liked), the line was a bit clumped however. They thought we were charging and our officer dies. It only really looks like a charge until AFTER the officer dies. I'll also note that we have been doing these point blank volleys the entire event. This caused a huge debate within the 1v1. Now you might think this "well he switched to melee before the officer died, therefore the intention was a charge" but the reason is because i often switch back and forth from melee to shooting in 1v1s when i'm bored and nothing is happening (whether you believe me or not is up to you). The question then is this, if you were referee of this event, how would you call it? From my perspective it was OA, from their perspective it was a charge and therefore valid (even though they had a slight FoC). This is just one of those weird moments where the call could go either way and you may never be sure that it was the right call.
(https://i.gyazo.com/39f1177693f0c1dabad9e68542433593.gif)[close]
I don't see how it looks like a charge to be honest. What I see is the officer and line running in a column, the officer giving the order to form on his left for a volley (then a probable charge) but getting shot and the line opting to just charge w/ the officer dead, the officer didn't switch to his sword and start running towards the line to lead the charge, he didn't immediately stop and independently fire a shot while his line broke into a charge, he just turned towards the line and held (then got shot). If I was ref, I'd probably slay for OA and 3rd kill shot (clear af FoL), but wouldn't reset for the OA because it doesn't look vital to the round in any way.
Not gonna lie if they were getting lined up to shoot that was a pretty shite lineSpoilerI want some judgement on this. This was an unofficial 1v1 (thank god) but this could be interpreted in so many ways. Basically our line was running up to volley them with a good angle (angle showing that the intention was to form a line and not to immediately charge but giving us the option to charge if we liked), the line was a bit clumped however. They thought we were charging and our officer dies. It only really looks like a charge until AFTER the officer dies. I'll also note that we have been doing these point blank volleys the entire event. This caused a huge debate within the 1v1. Now you might think this "well he switched to melee before the officer died, therefore the intention was a charge" but the reason is because i often switch back and forth from melee to shooting in 1v1s when i'm bored and nothing is happening (whether you believe me or not is up to you). The question then is this, if you were referee of this event, how would you call it? From my perspective it was OA, from their perspective it was a charge and therefore valid (even though they had a slight FoC). This is just one of those weird moments where the call could go either way and you may never be sure that it was the right call.
(https://i.gyazo.com/39f1177693f0c1dabad9e68542433593.gif)[close]
I don't see how it looks like a charge to be honest. What I see is the officer and line running in a column, the officer giving the order to form on his left for a volley (then a probable charge) but getting shot and the line opting to just charge w/ the officer dead, the officer didn't switch to his sword and start running towards the line to lead the charge, he didn't immediately stop and independently fire a shot while his line broke into a charge, he just turned towards the line and held (then got shot). If I was ref, I'd probably slay for OA and 3rd kill shot (clear af FoL), but wouldn't reset for the OA because it doesn't look vital to the round in any way.
Pls no h8
And the more i watch the clip, it looks more and more like a charge was ordered. The guys directly behind the officer spread and started to strafe like they would in a charge before the officer was even shot. I say for sure it was a fair shot after noticing this and that it was not OA.Neither side was perfect in this 1v1, we had a terrible line and they FoLed, it was also dinkleberg who was leading so keep in mind, not an experienced officer.
And honestly if that "line" (spaced and strafed all to hell) were to form on the officer you would have gotten decimated anyway because it would have taken a decade for a line to form and fire (without gaps) anyway based on the positions of the guys you see in the clip. Overall if a charge wasn't ordered the guys in line certainly made it look like it was a charge. Either way, the Russian line (58e) fucked up.
why don't you just upload the video you recorded that probably has audio to see if he either said "charge!" or "oh fuck I was shot, charge!"But that's too decisive
why don't you just upload the video you recorded that probably has audio to see if he either said "charge!" or "oh fuck I was shot, charge!"
why don't you just upload the video you recorded that probably has audio to see if he either said "charge!" or "oh fuck I was shot, charge!"
Hahaha good point ;D
why don't you just upload the video you recorded that probably has audio to see if he either said "charge!" or "oh fuck I was shot, charge!"
Hahaha good point ;D
It's not NWL related so there's no bother on continuing this conversation, lets talk about other things now,It is NWL related though O.o?? It was NWL practice with NWL rules with an NWL regiment. Regardless, the question was about how a referee might handle that situation which would be an important thing to discuss among referees. There is nothing else to really talk about atm besides match dates and what referee is reffing what. I don't see how we can't have both conversations at the same time, especially a conversation that holds some merit.
still in need of a referee I believe for PSG vs 4th Sunday at 8 est.
It's not NWL related so there's no bother on continuing this conversation, lets talk about other things now,It is NWL related though O.o?? It was NWL practice with NWL rules with an NWL regiment. Regardless, the question was about how a referee might handle that situation which would be an important thing to discuss among referees. There is nothing else to really talk about atm besides match dates and what referee is reffing what. I don't see how we can't have both conversations at the same time, especially a conversation that holds some merit.
still in need of a referee I believe for PSG vs 4th Sunday at 8 est.
Dealt with by whom? The conversation was entirely speculation so it can not be "dealt with." I can understand if the conversation was absolutely stupid and had no value what so ever but this clearly does not. It's 10pm at night, so i'm beginning wondering why you even care so much about stopping the conversation when you know that nothing else is really going on right now.SpoilerIt's not NWL related so there's no bother on continuing this conversation, lets talk about other things now,It is NWL related though O.o?? It was NWL practice with NWL rules with an NWL regiment. Regardless, the question was about how a referee might handle that situation which would be an important thing to discuss among referees. There is nothing else to really talk about atm besides match dates and what referee is reffing what. I don't see how we can't have both conversations at the same time, especially a conversation that holds some merit.
still in need of a referee I believe for PSG vs 4th Sunday at 8 est.[close]
I said the conversation need not be continued, the topic has been discussed and dealt with so now may we please move on :P
Dealt with by whom? The conversation was entirely speculation so it can not be "dealt with." I can understand if the conversation was absolutely stupid and had no value what so ever but this clearly does not. It's 10pm at night, so i'm beginning wondering why you even care so much about stopping the conversation when you know that nothing else is really going on right now.SpoilerIt's not NWL related so there's no bother on continuing this conversation, lets talk about other things now,It is NWL related though O.o?? It was NWL practice with NWL rules with an NWL regiment. Regardless, the question was about how a referee might handle that situation which would be an important thing to discuss among referees. There is nothing else to really talk about atm besides match dates and what referee is reffing what. I don't see how we can't have both conversations at the same time, especially a conversation that holds some merit.
still in need of a referee I believe for PSG vs 4th Sunday at 8 est.[close]
I said the conversation need not be continued, the topic has been discussed and dealt with so now may we please move on :P
*Becomes Trial ModDealt with by whom? The conversation was entirely speculation so it can not be "dealt with." I can understand if the conversation was absolutely stupid and had no value what so ever but this clearly does not. It's 10pm at night, so i'm beginning wondering why you even care so much about stopping the conversation when you know that nothing else is really going on right now.SpoilerIt's not NWL related so there's no bother on continuing this conversation, lets talk about other things now,It is NWL related though O.o?? It was NWL practice with NWL rules with an NWL regiment. Regardless, the question was about how a referee might handle that situation which would be an important thing to discuss among referees. There is nothing else to really talk about atm besides match dates and what referee is reffing what. I don't see how we can't have both conversations at the same time, especially a conversation that holds some merit.
still in need of a referee I believe for PSG vs 4th Sunday at 8 est.[close]
I said the conversation need not be continued, the topic has been discussed and dealt with so now may we please move on :P
becus he is an junior moderator fam
ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Ughare you back yet? :D
yesUghare you back yet? :D
God no, please no, no, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOyesUghare you back yet? :D
yay prepare yourselves FSE the shitposts start now! ;DyesUghare you back yet? :D
BabyJesus, no need to say stuff like that, especially on this thread. Keep things topical.yay prepare yourselves FSE the shitposts start now! ;DyesUghare you back yet? :D
lol sorryBabyJesus, no need to say stuff like that, especially on this thread. Keep things topical.yay prepare yourselves FSE the shitposts start now! ;DyesUghare you back yet? :D
BabyJesus, no need to say stuff like that, especially on this thread. Keep things topical.yay prepare yourselves FSE the shitposts start now! ;DyesUghare you back yet? :D
I come in peaceNo stfu
I come in peaceI know bb <3
Mine was topical to NANWL and wasn't meant to start arguments, rather a discussion among referees, it was also very late at night. There was no point to moderate our discussion. This post however wasn't topical, it could've started an argument and it was middle of the day. These are two entirely different things. Personally, if something is NANWL related and is not going to start an argument then it's fine to post on the NANWL thread, especially if nothing else is going on and many would agree. C'mon marco, think a bit fam ;) ffs.BabyJesus, no need to say stuff like that, especially on this thread. Keep things topical.yay prepare yourselves FSE the shitposts start now! ;DyesUghare you back yet? :D
Complains to a real NANWL mod for moderating.
Tries to moderate.
lmfao c'mon Gluk ffs...
I come in peacewelcome back
Theodin is my bae. it wasn't going to start an argumentMine was topical to NANWL and wasn't meant to start arguments, rather a discussion among referees, it was also very late at night. There was no point to moderate our discussion. This post however wasn't topical, it could've started an argument and it was middle of the day. These are two entirely different things. Personally, if something is NANWL related and is not going to start an argument then it's fine to post on the NANWL thread, especially if nothing else is going on and many would agree. C'mon marco, think a bit fam ;) ffs.BabyJesus, no need to say stuff like that, especially on this thread. Keep things topical.yay prepare yourselves FSE the shitposts start now! ;DyesUghare you back yet? :D
Complains to a real NANWL mod for moderating.
Tries to moderate.
lmfao c'mon Gluk ffs...I come in peacewelcome back
Gluk your paragraphs are pointless, just stop acting like a mod in places you aren't one. You don't need to spread your ideals to everyone you encounter. You act like a gay boy who just came out of the closet and is going around screaming every chance they get "HEY LOOK AT ME I'M GAY ACCEPT ME!"Now this might start an argument^
im only subscribed to this thread still for the banter
Gluk your paragraphs are pointless, just stop acting like a mod in places you aren't one. You don't need to spread your ideals to everyone you encounter. You act like a gay boy who just came out of the closet and is going around screaming every chance they get "HEY LOOK AT ME I'M GAY ACCEPT ME!"my new sig
Gluk your paragraphs are pointless, just stop acting like a mod in places you aren't one. You don't need to spread your ideals to everyone you encounter. You act like a gay boy who just came out of the closet and is going around screaming every chance they get "HEY LOOK AT ME I'M GAY ACCEPT ME!"Wasn't even trying to really moderate, i never said that if he didn't stop that bad things would happen. I was quite nice about it and the intent was only to prevent an argument. Also why are you even saying this? ad hominem much? I don't even want to start a banter fest over something so stupid.
But you're still going to reply, none-the-lessGluk your paragraphs are pointless, just stop acting like a mod in places you aren't one. You don't need to spread your ideals to everyone you encounter. You act like a gay boy who just came out of the closet and is going around screaming every chance they get "HEY LOOK AT ME I'M GAY ACCEPT ME!"Wasn't even trying to really moderate, i never said that if he didn't stop that bad things would happen. I was quite nice about it and the intent was only to prevent an argument. Also why are you even saying this? ad hominem much? I don't even want to start a banter fest over something so stupid.
I want some judgement on this. This was an unofficial 1v1 (thank god) but this could be interpreted in so many ways. Basically our line was running up to volley them with a good angle (angle showing that the intention was to form a line and not to immediately charge but giving us the option to charge if we liked), the line was a bit clumped however. They thought we were charging and our officer dies. It only really looks like a charge until AFTER the officer dies. I'll also note that we have been doing these point blank volleys the entire event. This caused a huge debate within the 1v1. Now you might think this "well he switched to melee before the officer died, therefore the intention was a charge" but the reason is because i often switch back and forth from melee to shooting in 1v1s when i'm bored and nothing is happening (whether you believe me or not is up to you). The question then is this, if you were referee of this event, how would you call it? From my perspective it was OA, from their perspective it was a charge and therefore valid (even though they had a slight FoC). This is just one of those weird moments where the call could go either way and you may never be sure that it was the right call.
(https://i.gyazo.com/39f1177693f0c1dabad9e68542433593.gif)
Name: BillTheBucher
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/thebutcherbill
Regiment: 58eme
Date when banned: Early Season 3
Name the rule/s you broke: Not a specified rule
How did you break this/these rule/s?: Trolled a regimental server and banned the players
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: Yes
pl0x
thank you for your input :)Hard to say from the footage shown. It does look like a charge since the entire line turns toward the enemy. Granted you could have called for a reform again, but if it looks like a charge and is that close, then a referee cannot be blamed for not calling it OA. Still, hard to tell from that rankers perspective. An overhead would have been more useful I suppose. Had the line been further away it would have been OA. A difficult call but one in which I would say: If in doubt don't punish.SpoilerI want some judgement on this. This was an unofficial 1v1 (thank god) but this could be interpreted in so many ways. Basically our line was running up to volley them with a good angle (angle showing that the intention was to form a line and not to immediately charge but giving us the option to charge if we liked), the line was a bit clumped however. They thought we were charging and our officer dies. It only really looks like a charge until AFTER the officer dies. I'll also note that we have been doing these point blank volleys the entire event. This caused a huge debate within the 1v1. Now you might think this "well he switched to melee before the officer died, therefore the intention was a charge" but the reason is because i often switch back and forth from melee to shooting in 1v1s when i'm bored and nothing is happening (whether you believe me or not is up to you). The question then is this, if you were referee of this event, how would you call it? From my perspective it was OA, from their perspective it was a charge and therefore valid (even though they had a slight FoC). This is just one of those weird moments where the call could go either way and you may never be sure that it was the right call.
(https://i.gyazo.com/39f1177693f0c1dabad9e68542433593.gif)[close]
thank you for your input :)Hard to say from the footage shown. It does look like a charge since the entire line turns toward the enemy. Granted you could have called for a reform again, but if it looks like a charge and is that close, then a referee cannot be blamed for not calling it OA. Still, hard to tell from that rankers perspective. An overhead would have been more useful I suppose. Had the line been further away it would have been OA. A difficult call but one in which I would say: If in doubt don't punish.SpoilerI want some judgement on this. This was an unofficial 1v1 (thank god) but this could be interpreted in so many ways. Basically our line was running up to volley them with a good angle (angle showing that the intention was to form a line and not to immediately charge but giving us the option to charge if we liked), the line was a bit clumped however. They thought we were charging and our officer dies. It only really looks like a charge until AFTER the officer dies. I'll also note that we have been doing these point blank volleys the entire event. This caused a huge debate within the 1v1. Now you might think this "well he switched to melee before the officer died, therefore the intention was a charge" but the reason is because i often switch back and forth from melee to shooting in 1v1s when i'm bored and nothing is happening (whether you believe me or not is up to you). The question then is this, if you were referee of this event, how would you call it? From my perspective it was OA, from their perspective it was a charge and therefore valid (even though they had a slight FoC). This is just one of those weird moments where the call could go either way and you may never be sure that it was the right call.
(https://i.gyazo.com/39f1177693f0c1dabad9e68542433593.gif)[close]
Hard to say from the footage shown. It does look like a charge since the entire line turns toward the enemy. Granted you could have called for a reform again, but if it looks like a charge and is that close, then a referee cannot be blamed for not calling it OA. Still, hard to tell from that rankers perspective. An overhead would have been more useful I suppose. Had the line been further away it would have been OA. A difficult call but one in which I would say: If in doubt don't punish.SpoilerI want some judgement on this. This was an unofficial 1v1 (thank god) but this could be interpreted in so many ways. Basically our line was running up to volley them with a good angle (angle showing that the intention was to form a line and not to immediately charge but giving us the option to charge if we liked), the line was a bit clumped however. They thought we were charging and our officer dies. It only really looks like a charge until AFTER the officer dies. I'll also note that we have been doing these point blank volleys the entire event. This caused a huge debate within the 1v1. Now you might think this "well he switched to melee before the officer died, therefore the intention was a charge" but the reason is because i often switch back and forth from melee to shooting in 1v1s when i'm bored and nothing is happening (whether you believe me or not is up to you). The question then is this, if you were referee of this event, how would you call it? From my perspective it was OA, from their perspective it was a charge and therefore valid (even though they had a slight FoC). This is just one of those weird moments where the call could go either way and you may never be sure that it was the right call.
(https://i.gyazo.com/39f1177693f0c1dabad9e68542433593.gif)[close]
We Need More Refs in This lEague#nickcoleforef2015
Aaannnndddd that's not going to help your case..Aaaaaaan nobody gives a flying fuck about your opinion...
Because no body wants it, i'm going to give my two cents and say that unbans should be if the person in question has been on good behaviour for the last while, is sincerely sorry for what he did, and is necessary for the well being of the regiment in question.
You are right, I just did it anywaysAaannnndddd that's not going to help your case..Aaaaaaan nobody gives a flying fuck about your opinion...
Because no body wants it, i'm going to give my two cents and say that unbans should be if the person in question has been on good behaviour for the last while, is sincerely sorry for what he did, and is necessary for the well being of the regiment in question.
Without bill we r shite like fr
Without bill we r shite like fr
Without bill we r shite like fr
Without bill we r shite like frthat's actually really sad :(
beat ayylmao first before you replace me, Hes in our reg now ;) kekekekWithout bill we r shite like fr
dw bby i am hur to sev u. i ken replace that baddie.
If he was denied, does this means the other unbans were denied as well? Still haven't seen any word, and it has literally been a month since I was told it would be talked about. I don't mean to be pushy but I'd really like an answer to whether I will be able to do this in the future or not.
Hope it makes you feel like a big guy keeping people from having fun on a GAME cheesey...you insignificant cheeseball. Some of you clowns take this shit way too seriouslyThank god you aren't taking this game seriously, cause if were you would be posting a lot of nonsense...
Not serious enough to keep people banned for ages so I can powertripHope it makes you feel like a big guy keeping people from having fun on a GAME cheesey...you insignificant cheeseball. Some of you clowns take this shit way too seriouslyThank god you aren't taking this game seriously, cause if were you would be posting a lot of nonsense...SpoilerOh wait[close]
Cheeseypants, Nappy Surena, and I have all made decisions regarding the league so I assure you there is no bias.Maybe the biasm is because it seems everyone who runs this, hates me on a personal basis ;)
Chances of Emo being unbanned from NWL 1% Chances of this comment being deleted 100%Him and Bill did not help the cause for themselves as they decided to through a tantrum on the thread
Is karth back yetBondage, no means no.
Also label send nudes
I have stepped down as Colonel of the 4th, my Lt.Col. Jorsonner is the new Leader of the 4th. Naga (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198058107597) is his second in command if you wanna update the contact list.
Thanks guys!
Wait, the only three people in charge on the NWL are Windflower, Nappy, and Cheesy? Should we vote on this shit as like... a community of competitive players? Or at least a few more... uh... veteran is the best word that comes to mind, of the competitive community on this staff? Like, I don't know Emo and Ap0c?
Wait, the only three people in charge on the NWL are Windflower, Nappy, and Cheesy? Should we vote on this shit as like... a community of competitive players? Or at least a few more... uh... veteran is the best word that comes to mind, of the competitive community on this staff? Like, I don't know Emo and Ap0c?
My dear boy do you really think this could be left to the masses to decide? Shit wouldn't get done at all. The people in charge have the understanding that they have to do maintain this in order to keep it going. Do I think its alot for them to handle? Eh...I mean some of these moderators also have their own regiments to run. Its not easy balancing between both the league and their regiment at times. Do I agree that someone who is not in charge of a reg should at least be one of the moderators? Yes. I think more than 1 person should be a moderator that is not in charge of a regiment. Do I think it will happen? Not likely, experience is key here. The moderators that are here have alot experience reffing 1v1s. And from the start these members of the community continue to get shit talked. These moderators have stepped up in a time where it was not their job to do so. Cheesy took over when Karth went afk for 2-3 months and Karth may or may not return. Cheesy picked two people that he felt are the most responsible for the position. To continue to badger them and to bother them will get this league no where. Keep calm and play NW and for fucks sake some of you kids need to grow up its a game not life.
Stop the shit posting, if you aren't involved in the league, do not post here.
Each regiment leader should have a vote on certain issues...not 3 biased powerhungry assholes. I'm going to miss another season of the NWL because of personal shit some of the 71st have against me. A member of 71st even told me that cheeseypants was bad mouthing me on their Teamspeak, saying I'm a fag and im never getting unbanned. Even before all the moderators decided.
The reason they aren't unbanning anyone and taking their precious time on it, is that it makes them feel the have power over others.
If anything someone who does not have a regiment in the league should be running it, so their regiment does not gain an advantage.
Someone who isn't a complete asshole like cheeseypants should take over or start a new league because this shit is ridiculous.
Each regiment leader should have a vote on certain issues...not 3 biased powerhungry assholes. I'm going to miss another season of the NWL because of personal shit some of the 71st have against me. A member of 71st even told me that cheeseypants was bad mouthing me on their Teamspeak, saying I'm a fag and im never getting unbanned. Even before all the moderators decided.
The reason they aren't unbanning anyone and taking their precious time on it, is that it makes them feel the have power over others.
If anything someone who does not have a regiment in the league should be running it, so their regiment does not gain an advantage.
Someone who isn't a complete asshole like cheeseypants should take over or start a new league because this shit is ridiculous.
I know mutual respect is an alien concept to you bill.
But if you disrespect me, as you have many times during your unban hearing, you will not get a shred of respect from me.
The mods decided unanimously to keep you banned, and anyone who knows you understands why.
Each regiment leader should have a vote on certain issues...not 3 biased powerhungry assholes. I'm going to miss another season of the NWL because of personal shit some of the 71st have against me. A member of 71st even told me that cheeseypants was bad mouthing me on their Teamspeak, saying I'm a fag and im never getting unbanned. Even before all the moderators decided.
The reason they aren't unbanning anyone and taking their precious time on it, is that it makes them feel the have power over others.
If anything someone who does not have a regiment in the league should be running it, so their regiment does not gain an advantage.
Someone who isn't a complete asshole like cheeseypants should take over or start a new league because this shit is ridiculous.
I know mutual respect is an alien concept to you bill.
But if you disrespect me, as you have many times during your unban hearing, you will not get a shred of respect from me.
The mods decided unanimously to keep you banned, and anyone who knows you understands why.
What exactly was it that got Bill banned from NWL in the first place? I'd just like to know in order to avoid saying anything ignorant.
Each regiment leader should have a vote on certain issues...not 3 biased powerhungry assholes. I'm going to miss another season of the NWL because of personal shit some of the 71st have against me. A member of 71st even told me that cheeseypants was bad mouthing me on their Teamspeak, saying I'm a fag and im never getting unbanned. Even before all the moderators decided.
The reason they aren't unbanning anyone and taking their precious time on it, is that it makes them feel the have power over others.
If anything someone who does not have a regiment in the league should be running it, so their regiment does not gain an advantage.
Someone who isn't a complete asshole like cheeseypants should take over or start a new league because this shit is ridiculous.
I know mutual respect is an alien concept to you bill.
But if you disrespect me, as you have many times during your unban hearing, you will not get a shred of respect from me.
The mods decided unanimously to keep you banned, and anyone who knows you understands why.
What exactly was it that got Bill banned from NWL in the first place? I'd just like to know in order to avoid saying anything ignorant.
Someone gave him the admin pass to the 1erMarins server before last season and told him to perm ban them all during an unofficial scrim.
Just leave the league huns
Make your own if it makes you feel better
Just leave the league huns
Make your own if it makes you feel better
Why? So we can further separate our already small and shrinking competitive community?
THIS LEAGUE was around long before Cheesey and the 71st were ever heard of. He has no right to handle the premier league of our community the way he does. His actions are direct representations of why the competitive scene in NA is dying. People wont drop the bullshit and want to keep on like they are better then those around them.
Guys can you just stop please?You're new.
The way ya'll are acting is why the competitive scene is dying in NA.
Guys can you just stop please?You're new.
The way ya'll are acting is why the competitive scene is dying in NA.
Guys can you just stop please?You're new.
The way ya'll are acting is why the competitive scene is dying in NA.
He's actually not new, in fact, he's been around longer than you have I think. Unless of course you're referencing his time in NANWL or the competitive scene.
Community Name: BeanBean
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198161599312/
Regiment: 63eme Régiment d'Infanterie de Ligne
Why do you want to be a referee? I would like to help out in a mature league that actually knows what its doing.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I have the experience and I know the rules. I feel that I am experienced enough with 1v1s to know what to do to make fair and reasonable calls.
Admin Experience: TNWL Head Moderator, Ref for Public Lbs.
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes of course
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes of course
Community Name: Chev
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198028707588
Regiment: 3eVolt
Why do you want to be a referee? Keep a good tournament going and find reffing somewhat fun.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? Unbiased and lots of experience from years of playing the game.
Admin Experience: NANWL
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes
Community Name: Modernassassin
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Modernassassin315
Regiment: 79th "Queens Own" Cameron Highlanders
Why do you want to be a referee? I would like to help out this league and I think people in this community know I'm unbiased and a calm person.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I have no outstanding problems with any regiment in this league and i'm a veteran of this game
Admin Experience: Besides my own server i admined 7NA GroupFighting
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Of Course
Oh really, which reg?Guys can you just stop please?You're new.
The way ya'll are acting is why the competitive scene is dying in NA.
He's actually not new, in fact, he's been around longer than you have I think. Unless of course you're referencing his time in NANWL or the competitive scene.
Thanks Commissar.
In fact a reg I lead 2 years ago stayed in TS with you Alex. xD
Mother of god you guys, please, we can all be friends.NUDES
NO, GOD DAMMIT.Mother of god you guys, please, we can all be friends.NUDES
The lights were dim, almost dark but just enough to see his face. His hair was slicked back, eyes glaring, focused on Label. An aroma filled the air...NO, GOD DAMMIT.Mother of god you guys, please, we can all be friends.NUDES
0_0The lights were dim, almost dark but just enough to see his face. His hair was slicked back, eyes glaring, focused on Label. An aroma filled the air...NO, GOD DAMMIT.Mother of god you guys, please, we can all be friends.NUDES
"Roses." Label remembered thinking. "Yeah, it smells like roses. Roses and honey."
Bondage parted his lips so as to speak.
"So..."
Bondage gave a short but noticeable pause. You could smell the gin in his breath. His lips puckering, occasionally moisturized by his tongue in one swift movement, he continued.
"...what are you wearing?"
Bondage had finished his sentence with a faint yet seductive smile.
Oh really, which reg?Guys can you just stop please?You're new.
The way ya'll are acting is why the competitive scene is dying in NA.
He's actually not new, in fact, he's been around longer than you have I think. Unless of course you're referencing his time in NANWL or the competitive scene.
Thanks Commissar.
In fact a reg I lead 2 years ago stayed in TS with you Alex. xD
He went by the name of Shadow before, although he was much more noobish at the time.
Oh my gosh, give it a break already.So Cheeseypants has given me permission to accept referee applications since he will be a bit more busy in the upcoming weeks, due to the shortage of referees I've decided to review and accept some from some time ago. There's still a couple under review and hopefully there will now be less of a shortage and more referees are available. Please make sure you have a referee booked for your match at least 1-2 days before your 1v1 minimum, it's not fun to have to rush through the steam group last minute for referees.SnipSpoilerCommunity Name: BeanBean
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198161599312/
Regiment: 63eme Régiment d'Infanterie de Ligne
Why do you want to be a referee? I would like to help out in a mature league that actually knows what its doing.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I have the experience and I know the rules. I feel that I am experienced enough with 1v1s to know what to do to make fair and reasonable calls.
Admin Experience: TNWL Head Moderator, Ref for Public Lbs.
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes of course
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes of course[close]
AcceptedSpoilerCommunity Name: Chev
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198028707588
Regiment: 3eVolt
Why do you want to be a referee? Keep a good tournament going and find reffing somewhat fun.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? Unbiased and lots of experience from years of playing the game.
Admin Experience: NANWL
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yes[close]
AcceptedSpoilerCommunity Name: Modernassassin
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Modernassassin315
Regiment: 79th "Queens Own" Cameron Highlanders
Why do you want to be a referee? I would like to help out this league and I think people in this community know I'm unbiased and a calm person.
Why do you think you would be a good referee? I have no outstanding problems with any regiment in this league and i'm a veteran of this game
Admin Experience: Besides my own server i admined 7NA GroupFighting
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yes
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Of Course[close]
Accepted
Reread my previous post.No.
Ok.Reread my previous post.No.
Oh really, which reg?Guys can you just stop please?You're new.
The way ya'll are acting is why the competitive scene is dying in NA.
He's actually not new, in fact, he's been around longer than you have I think. Unless of course you're referencing his time in NANWL or the competitive scene.
Thanks Commissar.
In fact a reg I lead 2 years ago stayed in TS with you Alex. xDHe went by the name of Shadow before, although he was much more noobish at the time.
Yup, I lead the "7th King's Regiment of Foot"
We sucked but it was ok, I was in the community in various regiments before that aswell.
Joined in early 2013.
What Has this Thread turn into? :PIt has gone back to it's roots
i like subscribing to NA League threads for the banterYou can find it on any competitive NA event thread. lol
Name: BillTheButcherc'mon bill...
Steam Profile (link):
Regiment: 58e
Date when banned:Too long ago to remember
Name the rule/s you broke: none (being an enemy of Jackie/Zzehth and the 71st)
How did you break this/these rule/s? Being BillTheButcher
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: No
problem?Name: BillTheButcherc'mon bill...
Steam Profile (link):
Regiment: 58e
Date when banned:Too long ago to remember
Name the rule/s you broke: none (being an enemy of Jackie/Zzehth and the 71st)
How did you break this/these rule/s? Being BillTheButcher
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: No
problem?Name: BillTheButcherc'mon bill...
Steam Profile (link):
Regiment: 58e
Date when banned:Too long ago to remember
Name the rule/s you broke: none (being an enemy of Jackie/Zzehth and the 71st)
How did you break this/these rule/s? Being BillTheButcher
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: No
Bill's thighs shook with adrenaline... anxious to get a response to his requestproblem?Name: BillTheButcherc'mon bill...
Steam Profile (link):
Regiment: 58e
Date when banned:Too long ago to remember
Name the rule/s you broke: none (being an enemy of Jackie/Zzehth and the 71st)
How did you break this/these rule/s? Being BillTheButcher
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: No
Bill's thighs shook with adrenaline... anxious to get a response to his requestproblem?Name: BillTheButcherc'mon bill...
Steam Profile (link):
Regiment: 58e
Date when banned:Too long ago to remember
Name the rule/s you broke: none (being an enemy of Jackie/Zzehth and the 71st)
How did you break this/these rule/s? Being BillTheButcher
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: No
Anxiously, he reviewed his list of prepared responses to different people. "Theodin's gonna get it." "Ohh, Blades gonna feel it." "Lets go."Bill's thighs shook with adrenaline... anxious to get a response to his requestproblem?Name: BillTheButcherc'mon bill...
Steam Profile (link):
Regiment: 58e
Date when banned:Too long ago to remember
Name the rule/s you broke: none (being an enemy of Jackie/Zzehth and the 71st)
How did you break this/these rule/s? Being BillTheButcher
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: No
He licked his lips and sat on the edge of his seat, waiting for the judgement of the North American Napoleonic Wars League Administration team. "Come on. Do it baby".
He went by the name of Shadow before, although he was much more noobish at the time.
can you be banned for constantly spamming this thread?A lot more people would be banned, if that were the case... Oh, wait, that sounds even better
__________████████_____██████
_________█░░░░░░░░██_██░░░░░░█
________█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░█
_______█░░░░░░░███░░░█░░░░░░░░░█
_______█░░░░███░░░███░█░░░████░█
______█░░░██░░░░░░░░███░██░░░░██
_____█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███
____█░░░░░░░░░░░░░██████░░░░░████░░█
____█░░░░░░░░░█████░░░████░░██░░██░░█
___██░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███
__█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████████░░█████████
_█░░░░░░░░░░█████_████___████_█████___█
_█░░░░░░░░░░█______█_███__█_____███_█___█
█░░░░░░░░░░░░█___████_████____██_██████
░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████████░░░████████░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░█░░░░░░██
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░░░░███████
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██
░░░░░░░░░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒███████████████▒▒█
░░░░░░░░░█▒▒███████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█
░░░░░░░░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█████████████████
░░░░░░░░░░████████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██████████████████
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██
▓██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██
▓▓▓███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███████████████▓▓█
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█
Dank__________████████_____██████
_________█░░░░░░░░██_██░░░░░░█
________█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░█
_______█░░░░░░░███░░░█░░░░░░░░░█
_______█░░░░███░░░███░█░░░████░█
______█░░░██░░░░░░░░███░██░░░░██
_____█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███
____█░░░░░░░░░░░░░██████░░░░░████░░█
____█░░░░░░░░░█████░░░████░░██░░██░░█
___██░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███
__█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████████░░█████████
_█░░░░░░░░░░█████_████___████_█████___█
_█░░░░░░░░░░█______█_███__█_____███_█___█
█░░░░░░░░░░░░█___████_████____██_██████
░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████████░░░████████░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░█░░░░░░██
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░░░░███████
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██
░░░░░░░░░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒███████████████▒▒█
░░░░░░░░░█▒▒███████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█
░░░░░░░░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█████████████████
░░░░░░░░░░████████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██████████████████
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██
▓██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██
▓▓▓███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███████████████▓▓█
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dASIJFMvw8
Q.Q truer words have never been said.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dASIJFMvw8
lmfao xD "Looks into his eyes and says 'Canada, eh?'" xD xD
Q.Q truer words have never been said.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dASIJFMvw8
lmfao xD "Looks into his eyes and says 'Canada, eh?'" xD xD
Q.Q truer words have never been said.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dASIJFMvw8
lmfao xD "Looks into his eyes and says 'Canada, eh?'" xD xD
I disagree.
(https://i.imgur.com/EIKl2U8.png)
dang season 5Dang its ded qq
63e Vs. 16th LIR 8:15 EST
Will need ref
63e Vs. 16th LIR 8:15 EST
Will need ref
I would get you but I didn't apply for ref not do I have the tuem to
Lekekenkxaojfkwoviwogiwjgiwoc
Ask Orcaryugioh
4th Vs. 71st this Saturday 9/5Its gonna be a great linebattle. Excited, have fun :)
We'll see how it goes.
Community Name: Commander Bondage
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/bondagebestna/
Regiment: USMC
Why do you want to be a referee? I enjoy reffing. And the more refs available the better for the league
Why do you think you would be a good referee? Ive reffed plenty of matches and have had zero complaints to my knowledge.
Admin Experience: NANWL Season 3 & 4. Cant remember whether I did Season 2 or not. NANWGL, Lemon's groupfighting Season 1, and some regiment servers.
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? Yee
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? Yee
4th Vs. 71st this Saturday 9/5Its gonna be a great linebattle. Excited, have fun :)
We'll see how it goes.
4th Vs. 71st this Saturday 9/5Its gonna be a great linebattle. Excited, have fun :)
We'll see how it goes.
It's gonna be a great rape. Excited, have lube :)
4th Vs. 71st this Saturday 9/5Its gonna be a great linebattle. Excited, have fun :)
We'll see how it goes.
It's gonna be a great rape. Excited, have lube :)
.......Don't be mad cause ur bad, mmmkay?
4th Vs. 71st this Saturday 9/5Its gonna be a great linebattle. Excited, have fun :)
We'll see how it goes.
It's gonna be a great rape. Excited, have lube :)
.......Don't be mad cause ur bad, mmmkay?
Hurt my feels
lawbanger I already banned you once. don't make me ban you again...4th Vs. 71st this Saturday 9/5Its gonna be a great linebattle. Excited, have fun :)
We'll see how it goes.
It's gonna be a great rape. Excited, have lube :)
lol?lawbanger I already banned you once. don't make me ban you again...4th Vs. 71st this Saturday 9/5Its gonna be a great linebattle. Excited, have fun :)
We'll see how it goes.
It's gonna be a great rape. Excited, have lube :)
wut I enjoy banning people. it brings me joy :)lol?lawbanger I already banned you once. don't make me ban you again...4th Vs. 71st this Saturday 9/5Its gonna be a great linebattle. Excited, have fun :)
We'll see how it goes.
It's gonna be a great rape. Excited, have lube :)
#People2Edge
wut I enjoy banning people. it brings me joy :)-What everyone thinks of me ayyyyyyyyyyy
Theodin is secretly hitlerSieg Hiel
We need a ref for 2nite
Theodin is secretly hitlerSieg Hiel
Again, if anyone disagrees with any calls i made during the match. Feel free to post about it.
What a time to be aliveThis Scrub
its a fucking game kidsTHIS IS FUCKING LIFE
Went ahead and just purged the off topic or other wise trolling/instigating posts regarding Bill. Ignoring several warnings/requests posting someones picture without their permission is a good way to get muted.You removed my erotica writing. Damn you.
Man, I really hope that you learn to place some limits on your anger. Hopefully somewhere along your life you humble yourself and become respectful :(BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAA looool
In America, the people rise up against oppression!
Keep deleting my posts.If you really quit this game, why still posting here?
Man, I really hope that you learn to place some limits on your anger. Hopefully somewhere along your life you humble yourself and become respectful :(BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAA looool
Stay off of this thread Alex, I don't want to have to tell you again.
10-0
71st win over the 4th gg
Aw why are you deleting all the juicy drama? Its so hard to get off to salty nerds raging at each other with all the posts getting deleted.IKR??
Aw why are you deleting all the juicy drama? Its so hard to get off to salty nerds raging at each other with all the posts getting deleted.
Aw why are you deleting all the juicy drama? Its so hard to get off to salty nerds raging at each other with all the posts getting deleted.
I barely play nw, but the forums will never cease to be enterraining
58e | 9 - 1 | 34eGG srry we trolled the second half and pls law tell your guys to stop shit talking its annoying
minor fol gg
I don't care dat clutch was real.........58e | 9 - 1 | 34eGG srry we trolled the second half and pls law tell your guys to stop shit talking its annoying
minor fol gg
58e | 9 - 1 | 34eGG srry we trolled the second half and pls law tell your guys to stop shit talking its annoying
minor fol gg
Oh Killem. Gotta him with that58e | 9 - 1 | 34eGG srry we trolled the second half and pls law tell your guys to stop shit talking its annoying
minor fol gg
Lol after the match our TS gets DDosed nice meme 34e. Maybe you should train in melee instead of reading how to DDos.
I'm sorry you got offended by our all chat. I thought you couldn't hear us on top of your hills.
PSG 10-0 79th,
Ref BeanBean or 79th can confirm it
Aren't you banned from NANWL?Oh Killem. Gotta him with that58e | 9 - 1 | 34eGG srry we trolled the second half and pls law tell your guys to stop shit talking its annoying
minor fol gg
Lol after the match our TS gets DDosed nice meme 34e. Maybe you should train in melee instead of reading how to DDos.
I'm sorry you got offended by our all chat. I thought you couldn't hear us on top of your hills.Spoiler(https://sp.yimg.com/ib/th?id=JN.yN4WO0gg35yrFh8QyUKp8A&pid=15.1&P=0&w=300&h=300)[close]
We really going through this again? What part of that's another John don't you understand at this point.Aren't you banned from NANWL?Oh Killem. Gotta him with that58e | 9 - 1 | 34eGG srry we trolled the second half and pls law tell your guys to stop shit talking its annoying
minor fol gg
Lol after the match our TS gets DDosed nice meme 34e. Maybe you should train in melee instead of reading how to DDos.
I'm sorry you got offended by our all chat. I thought you couldn't hear us on top of your hills.Spoiler(https://sp.yimg.com/ib/th?id=JN.yN4WO0gg35yrFh8QyUKp8A&pid=15.1&P=0&w=300&h=300)[close]Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/520f2449db444637a8b00747dabad277.png)[close]
Name: John~Sanders
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/id/JohnSanders/
Regiment: None
Date when banned: Idk sometime in 2014
Name the rule/s you broke: Double Reging
How did you break this/these rule/s? Playing for 2 different regs
Do you see your fault and promise not to break the rules again?: Yeah sure, even though I left this shit
Cheesey u literally said last week that he was clear for play
You cant penalize for that
He only went by John at the time he was banned, so he was listed as only "John."Cheesey u literally said last week that he was clear for play
You cant penalize for that
I received false information from him and another individual. He was more than aware that he was banned, and lied to our faces about it when he saw an opportunity. I just wish Jackie's ban list had been more specific :P.
He only went by John at the time he was banned, so he was listed as only "John."Cheesey u literally said last week that he was clear for play
You cant penalize for that
I received false information from him and another individual. He was more than aware that he was banned, and lied to our faces about it when he saw an opportunity. I just wish Jackie's ban list had been more specific :P.
It happens
Law we didn't ddos your ts Bc we were all on our server after the lb so pls stop being salty and John knew that he was banned from NWL I have chat evidence that he told me he was cleared anytho he wasn't cleared
Apoc, just because you have two options doesn't mean it's one of those two- I am under the impression that Mr Sanders informed Cheesey that he was not the John in question, and, unlike what some people think, Cheesey *gasp* took his word for it *what, but Cheesey is a nazi, why would he believe someone*!Cheesey should of known that he was banned because the week before when 58e fought 45e, 45e told mods that he was banned but the mods assumed it was someone else.
In terms of being cleared, unless he was charged with a criminal offence and found not guilty, being "cleared" means zilch if he actually is the John on the ban list.
stay classy NA
Godfreid who is best NA atm ?stay classy NA
Never! Git outta here Caz!
Idk, Maple is in a good place at the moment. He took first place in Masters division in the NADL for the second season, with myself and Bill being right behind him.Godfreid who is best NA atm ?stay classy NA
Never! Git outta here Caz!Spoilergr8 b8 m8 r8 8/8[close]
I can see offering a rematch to be fair. Anything else would be preposterous. 34e was utterly dominated by us.See, its not fair because you played a banned player. Anything else apart from a rematch would be fair.
Shat up, no one needs your salt right now.I can see offering a rematch to be fair. Anything else would be preposterous. 34e was utterly dominated by us.See, its not fair because you played a banned player. Anything else apart from a rematch would be fair.Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/7361a3f5cdb64661fa04b334f7dbc8bb.png)[close]
Theodin you were not involved with the proceedings of this so please stay out. You lack the information in this situation.Damn right i'm not
Note how that list also says knowingly u fool
snipGo make your own league if you think you could do a better job.
I feel like the easiest way for you to get people to stop saying that the 71st is biased in the league (at least for this issue) is for you to post the evidence you have about John Sanders lying to you about being the one on the ban list.
But in my personal opinion punishing the 58e for playing him after you said he was allowed to play wouldn't be fair; it was a mistake on the administrators fault and it would probably have been better if you had waiting for Jackie and Zzehth to get back to you on whether or not he was the player in question that was banned and told him he couldn't play until you had it figured out. It may have upset him and the 58e that they couldn't play him for the matches while you validated it but then if you had cleared him he would have been able to play the rest of the season.
Also one of the things I am confused about is how a banned player might prove that they deserve to be unbanned? Would they have to contact you and explain why they think they shouldn't be banned anymore or is there some other way? Just kinda confused from the way you put it.
Keep the banter off of the thread, Mr. Bean, do me a favor and stop hiding behind a fake account. It is no coincidence that you made this forum account today, that all 5 of your posts are on this thread and this thread only, and that as soon as you post you immediately log off.
In regards to the unban requests, as I have said now 4 times, all unban requests are PENDING, we are not going to deny any. The reason being is so as soon as someone is deemed worthy of being unbanned, they can be unbanned ASAP. Those banned were banned for a reason, whether or not you agree with the reason is irrelevant. If you would like to make your case in teamspeak in front of my and the other mods, let me know ASAP, otherwise stop complaining here.
If you don't like the way we run things, leave, I do not care, the rest of the mods do not care, and the rest of the participants do not care. Nothing is accomplished by participating in endless shit posting. Contact myself or another mod and we can work things out in a manner that accomplishes something.
Tonight will work for us, will you be available?
Tonight will work for us, will you be available?
Yeah
I sure hope that the admins here planned to touch on that ban list. Some of those peoples bans were abit questionable, and they have been banned for a very, very, very long time now.None of the bans were questionable. I do agree however that some bans should be lifted now considering the duration of the bans.
So even Jackie doesn't know if sanders is banned #GoodFight
So does the previous score stand? Or do we have to waste another day facing someone who won't put up a fight.
So even Jackie doesn't know if sanders is banned #GoodFightWhat a great winner.
So does the previous score stand? Or do we have to waste another day facing someone who won't put up a fight.
So even Jackie doesn't know if sanders is banned #GoodFight
So does the previous score stand? Or do we have to waste another day facing someone who won't put up a fight.
So even Jackie doesn't know if sanders is banned #GoodFight
So does the previous score stand? Or do we have to waste another day facing someone who won't put up a fight.
So even Jackie doesn't know if sanders is banned #GoodFight
So does the previous score stand? Or do we have to waste another day facing someone who won't put up a fight.
So even Jackie doesn't know if sanders is banned #GoodFight
So does the previous score stand? Or do we have to waste another day facing someone who won't put up a fight.
Honestly one of the most dickish things I've read on the forums.
I haven't followed the thread completely so I might be a bit out of the loop, but heres my thoughts on Jackies post:But they did- Cheesey stated that Zzehth proved it.
If the admins do not have proof that John Sanders is John then he should be unbanned. The burden of proof rests on the admins and if they can not provide evidence of his rule breaking to the community then it is ludicrous to keep him banned.
Anyway I recommend the admins make a detailed post on ban lengths for rules broken and stay consistent with it. Players should know when their ban expires or at least when they can appeal.
I haven't followed the thread completely so I might be a bit out of the loop, but heres my thoughts on Jackies post:But they did- Cheesey stated that Zzehth proved it.
If the admins do not have proof that John Sanders is John then he should be unbanned. The burden of proof rests on the admins and if they can not provide evidence of his rule breaking to the community then it is ludicrous to keep him banned.
Anyway I recommend the admins make a detailed post on ban lengths for rules broken and stay consistent with it. Players should know when their ban expires or at least when they can appeal.
Following two seperate unban hearings, the NANWL staff have decided that both Maccle and Wert will be unbanned from NANWL effective immediately.(https://i.imgur.com/PlVxOIj.png)
Thanks eh
Thanks eh
hey look guys maccle is canadian
Am I not allowed to be savagemore of a dick-hole thing to say than a savage.
Am I not allowed to be savage
rektAm I not allowed to be savage
Your attempts at being savage, are as sad as your melee capabilities.
Shots FiredAm I not allowed to be savage
Your attempts at being savage, are as sad as your melee capabilities.
Am I not allowed to be savage
Your attempts at being savage, are as sad as your melee capabilities.
Am I not allowed to be savage
Your attempts at being savage, are as sad as your melee capabilities.
now thats savage
Am I not allowed to be savage
Your attempts at being savage, are as sad as your melee capabilities.
w0w i thought i saw a tammo.Tammo is a rare creature in the NW community
#tammosighting
Or did they? 0.o
Or did they? 0.o
Wow, I thought these accusations couldn't get any worse lol.
Dayum, 30-0Out of four.
We've actually played only one match
Well it was to be expected after putting league 2 regs in the ring with league 1 regs
63e vs. 2ySG Thursday 815est
Need ref
63e vs. 2ySG Thursday 815est
Need ref
Any refs available?
w0w i thought i saw a tammo.Tammo is a rare creature in the NW community
#tammosighting
It actually does. New regiments don't want to face certain death.dood like stahp
Match forfeit, 63e 10 - 0 2ySGKinda wish they could still have played even with the low numbers :/ Even if it just ended up being a friendly 1v1 where both sides balanced ;P
They still could have. The rules don't say you have to forfeit due to low attendance.Match forfeit, 63e 10 - 0 2ySGKinda wish they could still have played even with the low numbers :/ Even if it just ended up being a friendly 1v1 where both sides balanced ;P
Yeah, I meant as in they could still have played instead of forfeit :-\They still could have. The rules don't say you have to forfeit due to low attendance.Match forfeit, 63e 10 - 0 2ySGKinda wish they could still have played even with the low numbers :/ Even if it just ended up being a friendly 1v1 where both sides balanced ;P
LIR 7 - 3 45eNice Win LIR
It was their own decision to forfeit the match.They still could have. The rules don't say you have to forfeit due to low attendance.Match forfeit, 63e 10 - 0 2ySGKinda wish they could still have played even with the low numbers :/ Even if it just ended up being a friendly 1v1 where both sides balanced ;P
The 4th has disbanded.
January 20, 2015 - September 11, 2015
The 4th has disbanded.
January 20, 2015 - September 11, 2015
Sooo, question to the mods, if I played for the 4th, but now they're disbanded, can I join another regiment involved in NANWL, or do I have to wait for next season?
You can join one this season, but not right before a match, and then leave :p (ik I'm not a mod but eh).The 4th has disbanded.
January 20, 2015 - September 11, 2015
Sooo, question to the mods, if I played for the 4th, but now they're disbanded, can I join another regiment involved in NANWL, or do I have to wait for next season?
You can join one this season, but not right before a match, and then leave :p (ik I'm not a mod but eh).The 4th has disbanded.
January 20, 2015 - September 11, 2015
Sooo, question to the mods, if I played for the 4th, but now they're disbanded, can I join another regiment involved in NANWL, or do I have to wait for next season?
No you can't play if you joined the regiment within like 2-3 days, I think that is how it works, but don't take my word. Also you can't leave a reg right after the lb you just joined. (Ik I'm not but a mod but eh). Edit: You can also steam me as well, I kinda have a good knowledge of the rules.You can join one this season, but not right before a match, and then leave :p (ik I'm not a mod but eh).The 4th has disbanded.
January 20, 2015 - September 11, 2015
Sooo, question to the mods, if I played for the 4th, but now they're disbanded, can I join another regiment involved in NANWL, or do I have to wait for next season?
Can I join right before a match and then not leave?
wow godfreid y u gotta be reg hoppin
Well I have bad newsfor you: Canadians can't get banned (cept rico n maccle, but rico is french Canadian so that hardly counts)
The 4th has disbanded.
January 20, 2015 - September 11, 2015
Gluk likes to think things58e 10 - 0 34e Match Forfeit9-1* 34e didn't forfeit
Didn't we have a few more rounds left? If you leave in the middle of the match, that's a forfeit.58e 10 - 0 34e Match Forfeit9-1* 34e didn't forfeit
wewlad.exe
They left at the end of the 10th round.i guess i just spaced out.
lol
Hey we got the same score even without John Sanders!!! omg Im so proud of usHigher salt content than the ocean
The 58e, Orcaryo, and I talked about it in teamspeak, I believe we've settled things for now.
I wouldn't say that everything has been entirely settled, i would ask lawbringer first as he is the regiment leader.The 58e, Orcaryo, and I talked about it in teamspeak, I believe we've settled things for now.
Glad to hear it.
I wouldn't say that everything has been entirely settled, i would ask lawbringer first as he is the regiment leader.The 58e, Orcaryo, and I talked about it in teamspeak, I believe we've settled things for now.
Glad to hear it.
Rule 31 has been added regarding the spawning of a musket for an officer. It had been an understood rule for a while, and has been enforced in the past. None the less, we now have a rule.
Formal Complaint:
Complaint 1: In the match against the 45e, they had players which they could play but decided not to play them. Forcing us to leave out members who would rather play and giving the other team the advantage of a smaller 1v1 (especially if they're more used to smaller 1v1s). We decided not to make a complaint for the match because we didn't expect it to happen again. This happened again today with the match against the PSG, they had about 18 players originally but only played around 12 of them, forcing us to constantly drop players that could have played. We believe that there should be a meeting and decide some rule change on this issue as it negatively effects larger regiments.SpoilerComplaint 2: They had gaps in their line throughout the 1v1 that were NOT created by deaths. They just intentionally created gaps, some of their members even moved around to create these gaps.
Complaint 3:
Windflower informed the referee that the officer could not have someone spawn in a musket despite it not being in the rules. Our officer could not have a musket throughout the second half of the match.
What would you like done about this?: Since we have 3 complaints, we ask for a rule change for the first complaint and possibly an additional round won due to the 2nd and 3rd complaint.
Show us some proof (screenshots, video): I have a video that will be going up as soon as i have time. You could also ask anyone involved in the match, especially Orcaryo[close]
Rule 31 has been added regarding the spawning of a musket for an officer. It had been an understood rule for a while, and has been enforced in the past. None the less, we now have a rule.
It's not a rule if it wasn't on the rule list. Of all my time, I have never heard such a rule ever being enforced.
Rule 31 has been added regarding the spawning of a musket for an officer. It had been an understood rule for a while, and has been enforced in the past. None the less, we now have a rule.
It's not a rule if it wasn't on the rule list. Of all my time, I have never heard such a rule ever being enforced.
The rules list would be endless if what you said is true.
Formal Complaint:
Complaint 1: In the match against the 45e, they had players which they could play but decided not to play them. Forcing us to leave out members who would rather play and giving the other team the advantage of a smaller 1v1 (especially if they're more used to smaller 1v1s). We decided not to make a complaint for the match because we didn't expect it to happen again. This happened again today with the match against the PSG, they had about 18 players originally but only played around 12 of them, forcing us to constantly drop players that could have played. We believe that there should be a meeting and decide some rule change on this issue as it negatively effects larger regiments.SpoilerComplaint 2: They had gaps in their line throughout the 1v1 that were NOT created by deaths. They just intentionally created gaps, some of their members even moved around to create these gaps.
Complaint 3:
Windflower informed the referee that the officer could not have someone spawn in a musket despite it not being in the rules. Our officer could not have a musket throughout the second half of the match.
What would you like done about this?: Since we have 3 complaints, we ask for a rule change for the first complaint and possibly an additional round won due to the 2nd and 3rd complaint.
Show us some proof (screenshots, video): I have a video that will be going up as soon as i have time. You could also ask anyone involved in the match, especially Orcaryo[close]
There is a minimum set, stop crying over everything. If they only wanted to play their more experienced players then that that is a valid option and choice. It isn't unfair, both teams have to balance that is all that matters. And honestly either way it still favors the larger regiment as you should have more skilled players to choose from to play in your starting lineup.
I fail to see how thats part of leadership and how its not stupid. Thatd be like Barcelona sitting out all of its players besides Messi and then turning it into a 1v1 and then call it a team game.
I fail to see how thats part of leadership and how its not stupid. Thatd be like Barcelona sitting out all of its players besides Messi and then turning it into a 1v1 and then call it a team game.
Except we're not dealing with professional rosters here, we're talking about regiments which generally accept even the noobiest of noobs. Its up to the leader if he wants to let that player join their competitive 1v1s, not the tournament organizer.
Pretty sure almost every regiment has at some point in time sat members because they are not skilled enough for a 1v1. Its part of leadership and there's not really anything you can do to stop it.If that were to happen, it would most likely be due to having larger numbers. They would switch a player out without forcing the other team to drop any.
Pretty sure almost every regiment has at some point in time sat members because they are not skilled enough for a 1v1. Its part of leadership and there's not really anything you can do to stop it.If that were to happen, it would most likely be due to having larger numbers. They would switch a player out without forcing the other team to drop any.
In the discussion with windflower, we brought up the idea of having the other team either announce of the forums or the other team that they were going to drop players during the match due to skill. This way we could plan ahead and players that might have something else planned, would be able to leave and do that instead of the 1v1. I don't think it solves the issue but it's something i could live with.
My concern is over the players that won't be able to play, especially on both teams. It's idiotic to me to have both teams have players sitting out because they supposedly aren't good enough to play, even if one team wants to play them. We shouldn't be forced to pick and choice players if we don't need to. Now say for instance that a regiment is half good, half bad and another regiment has members that are pretty average but have slightly more members. The first regiment decides to only play 11 of their best, the rest sit out. The other regiment then plays 12 of their average players and now has a clear disadvantage when otherwise it would've been an even match. I don't see this as fair. This tournament is about who has the best regiment, not who has the best players.
Now the 58e for example would do very well if we decided to pull this move but we don't because we believe that every player should be able to play regardless of skill level. Although we are very good, we believe that community is more important than winning (at least i do).
"It's not about winning, it's about fun" - Spongebob Squarepants
I fail to see how thats part of leadership and how its not stupid. Thatd be like Barcelona sitting out all of its players besides Messi and then turning it into a 1v1 and then call it a team game.
Except we're not dealing with professional rosters here, we're talking about regiments which generally accept even the noobiest of noobs. Its up to the leader if he wants to let that player join their competitive 1v1s, not the tournament organizer.
Or heres a suggestion: dont let the noobiest of noobs join your competitive regiment. Or at the very least give them like trial ranks or something so they know they arent officially part of the regiment until they improve.
The way the rules are now you might as well set it up as 15v15, because the regiment with the best 15 is gonna win under these rules. No two ways around it.
I fail to see how thats part of leadership and how its not stupid. Thatd be like Barcelona sitting out all of its players besides Messi and then turning it into a 1v1 and then call it a team game.
Pretty sure almost every regiment has at some point in time sat members because they are not skilled enough for a 1v1. Its part of leadership and there's not really anything you can do to stop it.
1. It's entirely different because those games often have a limit to the number of players that you can bring in while NANWL only sets a minimum required (10) and as long as the other team brings equal or +1 numbers, the teams could theoretically be infinite.I fail to see how thats part of leadership and how its not stupid. Thatd be like Barcelona sitting out all of its players besides Messi and then turning it into a 1v1 and then call it a team game.
ROFL they do have players they sit out! Every pro sport nearly does. ITS CALLED THE BENCH! lmfao...Pretty sure almost every regiment has at some point in time sat members because they are not skilled enough for a 1v1. Its part of leadership and there's not really anything you can do to stop it.
^ This
1. It's entirely different because those games often have a limit to the number of players that you can bring in while NANWL only sets a minimum required (10) and as long as the other team brings equal or +1 numbers, the teams could theoretically be infinite.I fail to see how thats part of leadership and how its not stupid. Thatd be like Barcelona sitting out all of its players besides Messi and then turning it into a 1v1 and then call it a team game.
ROFL they do have players they sit out! Every pro sport nearly does. ITS CALLED THE BENCH! lmfao...Pretty sure almost every regiment has at some point in time sat members because they are not skilled enough for a 1v1. Its part of leadership and there's not really anything you can do to stop it.
^ This
2. Read my previous comment on it.
why dont leaders just steam each other their estimated attendance so that the bigger regiment can just bring a smaller amount of playersThis is what we are proposing or something similar, some sort of indicator to not bring as many as we normally would.
I remember a time in NW where there wasn't a thread to post on about 1v1s and rules. You just joined a server then played the game. The simple days...You can always go back, you know.
I remember a time in NW where there wasn't a thread to post on about 1v1s and rules. You just joined a server then played the game. The simple days...You can always go back, you know.
I remember a time in NW where there wasn't a thread to post on about 1v1s and rules. You just joined a server then played the game. The simple days...You can always go back, you know.
why dont leaders just steam each other their estimated attendance so that the bigger regiment can just bring a smaller amount of playersThis is what we are proposing or something similar, some sort of indicator to not bring as many as we normally would.
why dont leaders just steam each other their estimated attendance so that the bigger regiment can just bring a smaller amount of playersThis is what we are proposing or something similar, some sort of indicator to not bring as many as we normally would.
I don't know why you need a rule for this. Just ask the leader how many they will bring over steam.
why dont leaders just steam each other their estimated attendance so that the bigger regiment can just bring a smaller amount of playersThis is what we are proposing or something similar, some sort of indicator to not bring as many as we normally would.
I don't know why you need a rule for this. Just ask the leader how many they will bring over steam.
New Rule: You have to wear your regiment's official T-Shirt for every 1v1. In order to prevent liars you also have to provide a picture of you wearing the "jersey" in order for you to be eligible to play.
All I'm going to say is that we knew we were playing a regiment that'd be a challenge and we only wanted our best players attending so we could have the best performance, I don't see it as a problem, but telling the 58e through steam beforehand might have been a good idea though it's probably more of a sportsmanship thing than a rule.
I assume most regiments don't have a plethora of members to pick and choose from for competitive 1v1s. So if someone is being God-awful, I would understand that they would be told to sit out. We generally do the same thing, the only difference is that we have many others that can easily replace them. I don't think it is a regiments' fault if they want to sit one of their bad players out. If I recall correctly, I do remember one of lawbringer's regiments (or waste's, I don't know) fielding the minimum when they went against us in a 1v1 previously (maybe a past season or random 1v1 before, wasn't too important for me to remember). I remember it vaguely, but I do remember something happening like that. Its kind of annoying, yeah; but at the same time I honestly don't blame them. Hypothetically, if we only have 15 NWL-ready members on a given night, and our opponent has 20, and they know that we have ~80 on during event times (as we do still have regular events for everyone else, on top of 1v1s), I am not going to pull a bunch of randoms or those who aren't even interested in the competitive scene just so we can match what they brought.Myes.
However, I always ask our opponent how many they have, and try to match their numbers +5 no matter what. I'd say it's NWL etiquette to ask for your opponents' numbers, in my opinion anyway.
Its fucking NW are you guys retarded? Show up and play the fucking match, if you have to balance then get the fuck over it. It changes nothing. If you cant win you cant fucking win stop trying to make excuses. Its a god damn game in which these 1v1's mean absolutely NOTHING. You will win or lose and go on to play another. Stop bitching over the most random fucking things.
I am legit ashamed to be apart of this community at this point. Gluk i used to like you, but your posts on FSE have proven the hate towards you has great reason behind it. You are a loud mouth fucking moron who bitches and moans like a female rights activist. So tired of reading your arrogant posts.
And ap0c you are still a fucking moron who hops on everyone else's dick in every situation you are in because you lack the base intellect to support your own arguments and statements.
I would also like to note that a good majority of you do not even have a fucking clue about anything when it comes to the leadership side of this game and our community. Yet you want to talk about rule changes like you have some legitimate input. When in reality the only leadership experience you likely have is MAYBE taking over when the officers die. Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.
Its fucking NW are you guys retarded? Show up and play the fucking match, if you have to balance then get the fuck over it. It changes nothing. If you cant win you cant fucking win stop trying to make excuses. Its a god damn game in which these 1v1's mean absolutely NOTHING. You will win or lose and go on to play another. Stop bitching over the most random fucking things.
I am legit ashamed to be apart of this community at this point. Gluk i used to like you, but your posts on FSE have proven the hate towards you has great reason behind it. You are a loud mouth fucking moron who bitches and moans like a female rights activist. So tired of reading your arrogant posts.
And ap0c you are still a fucking moron who hops on everyone else's dick in every situation you are in because you lack the base intellect to support your own arguments and statements.
I would also like to note that a good majority of you do not even have a fucking clue about anything when it comes to the leadership side of this game and our community. Yet you want to talk about rule changes like you have some legitimate input. When in reality the only leadership experience you likely have is MAYBE taking over when the officers die. Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.
Still waiting for my sig btw you scrub.
I assume most regiments don't have a plethora of members to pick and choose from for competitive 1v1s. So if someone is being God-awful, I would understand that they would be told to sit out. We generally do the same thing, the only difference is that we have many others that can easily replace them. I don't think it is a regiments' fault if they want to sit one of their bad players out. If I recall correctly, I do remember one of lawbringer's regiments (or waste's, I don't know) fielding the minimum when they went against us in a 1v1 previously (maybe a past season or random 1v1 before, wasn't too important for me to remember). I remember it vaguely, but I do remember something happening like that. Its kind of annoying, yeah; but at the same time I honestly don't blame them. Hypothetically, if we only have 15 NWL-ready members on a given night, and our opponent has 20, and they know that we have ~80 on during event times (as we do still have regular events for everyone else, on top of 1v1s), I am not going to pull a bunch of randoms or those who aren't even interested in the competitive scene just so we can match what they brought.
However, I always ask our opponent how many they have, and try to match their numbers +5 no matter what. I'd say it's NWL etiquette to ask for your opponents' numbers, in my opinion anyway.
I assume most regiments don't have a plethora of members to pick and choose from for competitive 1v1s. So if someone is being God-awful, I would understand that they would be told to sit out. We generally do the same thing, the only difference is that we have many others that can easily replace them. I don't think it is a regiments' fault if they want to sit one of their bad players out. If I recall correctly, I do remember one of lawbringer's regiments (or waste's, I don't know) fielding the minimum when they went against us in a 1v1 previously (maybe a past season or random 1v1 before, wasn't too important for me to remember). I remember it vaguely, but I do remember something happening like that. Its kind of annoying, yeah; but at the same time I honestly don't blame them. Hypothetically, if we only have 15 NWL-ready members on a given night, and our opponent has 20, and they know that we have ~80 on during event times (as we do still have regular events for everyone else, on top of 1v1s), I am not going to pull a bunch of randoms or those who aren't even interested in the competitive scene just so we can match what they brought.
However, I always ask our opponent how many they have, and try to match their numbers +5 no matter what. I'd say it's NWL etiquette to ask for your opponents' numbers, in my opinion anyway.
I still feel that competitive regiments should be such, and only have competitive members and should play everyone they have available. I have slept around in this community and I've been in alot of different competitive regiments, and never once have I seen them ask players to sit out. 9y, 18th, 3e, 58e, 7thRF, none of them. We always played all of our guys. The only exception I would permit is sitting out trial members. That's basically it.
Honestly, why does it bother you guys so much? Gluk and Apoc, you still won the match. Believe me, I've had my fair share of situations where the other team says thier bringing 15 and yet brings like 11- or any balance issue as such.
IMO, the real question about rules should be when teams get people to go to spec, force the other side to drop one to balance, and then bring another guy in to negate the +1. That's the truly annoying tactic, which is sadly still used.
Its fucking NW are you guys retarded? Show up and play the fucking match, if you have to balance then get the fuck over it. It changes nothing. If you cant win you cant fucking win stop trying to make excuses. Its a god damn game in which these 1v1's mean absolutely NOTHING. You will win or lose and go on to play another. Stop bitching over the most random fucking things.
I am legit ashamed to be apart of this community at this point. Gluk i used to like you, but your posts on FSE have proven the hate towards you has great reason behind it. You are a loud mouth fucking moron who bitches and moans like a female rights activist. So tired of reading your arrogant posts.
And ap0c you are still a fucking moron who hops on everyone else's dick in every situation you are in because you lack the base intellect to support your own arguments and statements.
I would also like to note that a good majority of you do not even have a fucking clue about anything when it comes to the leadership side of this game and our community. Yet you want to talk about rule changes like you have some legitimate input. When in reality the only leadership experience you likely have is MAYBE taking over when the officers die. Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.
I assume most regiments don't have a plethora of members to pick and choose from for competitive 1v1s. So if someone is being God-awful, I would understand that they would be told to sit out. We generally do the same thing, the only difference is that we have many others that can easily replace them. I don't think it is a regiments' fault if they want to sit one of their bad players out. If I recall correctly, I do remember one of lawbringer's regiments (or waste's, I don't know) fielding the minimum when they went against us in a 1v1 previously (maybe a past season or random 1v1 before, wasn't too important for me to remember). I remember it vaguely, but I do remember something happening like that. Its kind of annoying, yeah; but at the same time I honestly don't blame them. Hypothetically, if we only have 15 NWL-ready members on a given night, and our opponent has 20, and they know that we have ~80 on during event times (as we do still have regular events for everyone else, on top of 1v1s), I am not going to pull a bunch of randoms or those who aren't even interested in the competitive scene just so we can match what they brought.
However, I always ask our opponent how many they have, and try to match their numbers +5 no matter what. I'd say it's NWL etiquette to ask for your opponents' numbers, in my opinion anyway.
I still feel that competitive regiments should be such, and only have competitive members and should play everyone they have available. I have slept around in this community and I've been in alot of different competitive regiments, and never once have I seen them ask players to sit out. 9y, 18th, 3e, 58e, 7thRF, none of them. We always played all of our guys. The only exception I would permit is sitting out trial members. That's basically it.
Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
My man, Italy is far away. I'm pretty sure they could hardly move around with that ping.Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
Well considering the 58e has plenty of european players who play in our NWL matches all the time. Pretty sure we had at least 2 play last night at our match, so I think sitting out your Italian players who joined your regiment and showed up to your match is hardly fair. If you dont intend to allow the players you recruited into your regiment play, there is hardly a point for them to even be in your regiment. Also about 3 players just wanting to watch....that sounds abit sketch. Not trying to make any accusations, but that sounds abiit sketch.
My man, Italy is far away. I'm pretty sure they could hardly move around with that ping.Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
Well considering the 58e has plenty of european players who play in our NWL matches all the time. Pretty sure we had at least 2 play last night at our match, so I think sitting out your Italian players who joined your regiment and showed up to your match is hardly fair. If you dont intend to allow the players you recruited into your regiment play, there is hardly a point for them to even be in your regiment. Also about 3 players just wanting to watch....that sounds abit sketch. Not trying to make any accusations, but that sounds abiit sketch.
Youre talking as if Europe was all in one same spot. Some countries are farther than others. Someone in England will have better ping than someone in Italy. Because wherever they are in Europe is closer to where the server is hostedMy man, Italy is far away. I'm pretty sure they could hardly move around with that ping.Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
Well considering the 58e has plenty of european players who play in our NWL matches all the time. Pretty sure we had at least 2 play last night at our match, so I think sitting out your Italian players who joined your regiment and showed up to your match is hardly fair. If you dont intend to allow the players you recruited into your regiment play, there is hardly a point for them to even be in your regiment. Also about 3 players just wanting to watch....that sounds abit sketch. Not trying to make any accusations, but that sounds abiit sketch.
So is all of Europe. But Kore/Caz/Soldier dont seem to mind, so neither does Law.
SpoilerIts fucking NW are you guys retarded? Show up and play the fucking match, if you have to balance then get the fuck over it. It changes nothing. If you cant win you cant fucking win stop trying to make excuses. Its a god damn game in which these 1v1's mean absolutely NOTHING. You will win or lose and go on to play another. Stop bitching over the most random fucking things.
I am legit ashamed to be apart of this community at this point. Gluk i used to like you, but your posts on FSE have proven the hate towards you has great reason behind it. You are a loud mouth fucking moron who bitches and moans like a female rights activist. So tired of reading your arrogant posts.
And ap0c you are still a fucking moron who hops on everyone else's dick in every situation you are in because you lack the base intellect to support your own arguments and statements.
I would also like to note that a good majority of you do not even have a fucking clue about anything when it comes to the leadership side of this game and our community. Yet you want to talk about rule changes like you have some legitimate input. When in reality the only leadership experience you likely have is MAYBE taking over when the officers die. Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.[close]
I was hoping I would get bashed too actually, lol.
Anyway, I never really liked that people always whip out the "it's a game" reasoning; I thought CS:GO was just a game, but apparently that is actually not the case on many parts. As far as I know that's not the only game like that either.SpoilerI assume most regiments don't have a plethora of members to pick and choose from for competitive 1v1s. So if someone is being God-awful, I would understand that they would be told to sit out. We generally do the same thing, the only difference is that we have many others that can easily replace them. I don't think it is a regiments' fault if they want to sit one of their bad players out. If I recall correctly, I do remember one of lawbringer's regiments (or waste's, I don't know) fielding the minimum when they went against us in a 1v1 previously (maybe a past season or random 1v1 before, wasn't too important for me to remember). I remember it vaguely, but I do remember something happening like that. Its kind of annoying, yeah; but at the same time I honestly don't blame them. Hypothetically, if we only have 15 NWL-ready members on a given night, and our opponent has 20, and they know that we have ~80 on during event times (as we do still have regular events for everyone else, on top of 1v1s), I am not going to pull a bunch of randoms or those who aren't even interested in the competitive scene just so we can match what they brought.
However, I always ask our opponent how many they have, and try to match their numbers +5 no matter what. I'd say it's NWL etiquette to ask for your opponents' numbers, in my opinion anyway.
I still feel that competitive regiments should be such, and only have competitive members and should play everyone they have available. I have slept around in this community and I've been in alot of different competitive regiments, and never once have I seen them ask players to sit out. 9y, 18th, 3e, 58e, 7thRF, none of them. We always played all of our guys. The only exception I would permit is sitting out trial members. That's basically it.[close]
I suppose its all semantics, really. We would probably never sit people out 'purposefully' in order to maximize our competitive efficiency (if that makes sense). Although hell, if one of our Guards is having a 'bad day', going -2 and 3 in the first few rounds, I will more than likely tell them to sit out the rest of the match, and replace them with someone else a tad more capable. However, the way I see it, your opponent dropping members in order to field the minimum (to optimize their skill) shouldn't really make that big of an impact on one's own regiment: You would just end up balancing by keeping those in who are the most skilled prioritized, so to me it seems to even itself out on the matter. For those who have to sit out, i'm almost assured they don't mind if it means that their own regiment has a better chance at winning, especially in a competitive 1v1 scenario. Not always the case, I will admit however.
The primary thing that bothers me is that some regiments have tried dropping one person, making us drop one, then putting someone in last-minute in order to balance the teams to their benefit as much as possible. That's probably the only thing quite annoying. Besides the shooting-then-running-away move, but then again that's just tact.
Oh, and is this rule-changing chat about dropping muskets down as well? I think we did that for Karth once last season only because we noticed our opponent did it as well: As far as I recall, it actually didn't make that much of a difference.
Youre talking as if Europe was all in one same spot. Some countries are farther than others. Someone in England will have better ping than someone in Italy. Because wherever they are in Europe is closer to where the server is hostedMy man, Italy is far away. I'm pretty sure they could hardly move around with that ping.Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
Well considering the 58e has plenty of european players who play in our NWL matches all the time. Pretty sure we had at least 2 play last night at our match, so I think sitting out your Italian players who joined your regiment and showed up to your match is hardly fair. If you dont intend to allow the players you recruited into your regiment play, there is hardly a point for them to even be in your regiment. Also about 3 players just wanting to watch....that sounds abit sketch. Not trying to make any accusations, but that sounds abiit sketch.
So is all of Europe. But Kore/Caz/Soldier dont seem to mind, so neither does Law.
Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
Well considering the 58e has plenty of european players who play in our NWL matches all the time. Pretty sure we had at least 2 play last night at our match, so I think sitting out your Italian players who joined your regiment and showed up to your match is hardly fair. If you dont intend to allow the players you recruited into your regiment play, there is hardly a point for them to even be in your regiment. Also about 3 players just wanting to watch....that sounds abit sketch. Not trying to make any accusations, but that sounds abiit sketch.
Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
Well considering the 58e has plenty of european players who play in our NWL matches all the time. Pretty sure we had at least 2 play last night at our match, so I think sitting out your Italian players who joined your regiment and showed up to your match is hardly fair. If you dont intend to allow the players you recruited into your regiment play, there is hardly a point for them to even be in your regiment. Also about 3 players just wanting to watch....that sounds abit sketch. Not trying to make any accusations, but that sounds abiit sketch.
Implying you know how Gyo and Darkaraty felt about being sat out. "Hardly a point to be in our regiment", they've come to pretty much every single event since they've joined, they're very humble and they understand the stakes of the competition. After the match I steamed them both apologizing for sitting them out and told them that it would not happen often. They were completely fine with it and Gyo even told me he had fun at the training where we all changed our names etc etc. (good times). Not every regiment only plays in competitive 1v1s, we go to 2-3 public events a week and I'm fairly sure our guys prefer those too.
Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
Well considering the 58e has plenty of european players who play in our NWL matches all the time. Pretty sure we had at least 2 play last night at our match, so I think sitting out your Italian players who joined your regiment and showed up to your match is hardly fair. If you dont intend to allow the players you recruited into your regiment play, there is hardly a point for them to even be in your regiment. Also about 3 players just wanting to watch....that sounds abit sketch. Not trying to make any accusations, but that sounds abiit sketch.
Implying you know how Gyo and Darkaraty felt about being sat out. "Hardly a point to be in our regiment", they've come to pretty much every single event since they've joined, they're very humble and they understand the stakes of the competition. After the match I steamed them both apologizing for sitting them out and told them that it would not happen often. They were completely fine with it and Gyo even told me he had fun at the training where we all changed our names etc etc. (good times). Not every regiment only plays in competitive 1v1s, we go to 2-3 public events a week and I'm fairly sure our guys prefer those too.
The fact that they were fine with it doesnt mean that they still would have liked to play. My point still stands.
Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
Well considering the 58e has plenty of european players who play in our NWL matches all the time. Pretty sure we had at least 2 play last night at our match, so I think sitting out your Italian players who joined your regiment and showed up to your match is hardly fair. If you dont intend to allow the players you recruited into your regiment play, there is hardly a point for them to even be in your regiment. Also about 3 players just wanting to watch....that sounds abit sketch. Not trying to make any accusations, but that sounds abiit sketch.
Implying you know how Gyo and Darkaraty felt about being sat out. "Hardly a point to be in our regiment", they've come to pretty much every single event since they've joined, they're very humble and they understand the stakes of the competition. After the match I steamed them both apologizing for sitting them out and told them that it would not happen often. They were completely fine with it and Gyo even told me he had fun at the training where we all changed our names etc etc. (good times). Not every regiment only plays in competitive 1v1s, we go to 2-3 public events a week and I'm fairly sure our guys prefer those too.
The fact that they were fine with it doesnt mean that they still would have liked to play. My point still stands.
So you know them better than they know themselves?
The fact that they showed up to the event should imply that they want to play. Besides that, Windflower just said he apologized to them, implying he had done them wrong. I may not be able to read minds, but I can read context clues.Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
Well considering the 58e has plenty of european players who play in our NWL matches all the time. Pretty sure we had at least 2 play last night at our match, so I think sitting out your Italian players who joined your regiment and showed up to your match is hardly fair. If you dont intend to allow the players you recruited into your regiment play, there is hardly a point for them to even be in your regiment. Also about 3 players just wanting to watch....that sounds abit sketch. Not trying to make any accusations, but that sounds abiit sketch.
Implying you know how Gyo and Darkaraty felt about being sat out. "Hardly a point to be in our regiment", they've come to pretty much every single event since they've joined, they're very humble and they understand the stakes of the competition. After the match I steamed them both apologizing for sitting them out and told them that it would not happen often. They were completely fine with it and Gyo even told me he had fun at the training where we all changed our names etc etc. (good times). Not every regiment only plays in competitive 1v1s, we go to 2-3 public events a week and I'm fairly sure our guys prefer those too.
The fact that they were fine with it doesnt mean that they still would have liked to play. My point still stands.
So you know them better than they know themselves?
Well StJohn just said you sat them so am I gonna take your word (and screen) against his word?Uh. Kek.
:-\
Just my two cents for the decision last night. We only had roughly 5 or so players extra come than what we played, 2 of which are from Italy so their ping was grounds enough to sit them out. The other 3ish either just wanted to watch or were there if need be. I don't think there should be any additional rule about having to play everyone you possibly can or post about your numbers. Especially since you never know who is going to come or who has last minute plans. In case you forgot, this is a game and that comes second to real life though i see plenty of evidence showing this statement to be false regarding some of you. What should be done in the future is tell your men that this is a tournament so anybody that doesn't like competition or may not make it to not come. You may also remind your guys that you may bring more than the opponent so people will sit out and can continue ghosting if they so please, but they can either be rotated in if you "feel bad" for them or they can spectate and feel encouraged to become good enough at the game to join the NWL team. It was a good match in the end, good luck with the rest of the tournament, I look forward to future matches.
Well considering the 58e has plenty of european players who play in our NWL matches all the time. Pretty sure we had at least 2 play last night at our match, so I think sitting out your Italian players who joined your regiment and showed up to your match is hardly fair. If you dont intend to allow the players you recruited into your regiment play, there is hardly a point for them to even be in your regiment. Also about 3 players just wanting to watch....that sounds abit sketch. Not trying to make any accusations, but that sounds abiit sketch.
Implying you know how Gyo and Darkaraty felt about being sat out. "Hardly a point to be in our regiment", they've come to pretty much every single event since they've joined, they're very humble and they understand the stakes of the competition. After the match I steamed them both apologizing for sitting them out and told them that it would not happen often. They were completely fine with it and Gyo even told me he had fun at the training where we all changed our names etc etc. (good times). Not every regiment only plays in competitive 1v1s, we go to 2-3 public events a week and I'm fairly sure our guys prefer those too.
The fact that they were fine with it doesnt mean that they still would have liked to play. My point still stands.
So you know them better than they know themselves?
The fact that they showed up to the event should imply that they want to play. Besides that, Windflower just said he apologized to them, implying he had done them wrong. I may not be able to read minds, but I can read context clues.
The point is I should not have to. They came to the event, were in the PSG, and were wearing PSG tags. It should be implied they are there to play. No "being Sherlock Holmes" necessary.Going to events does not mean playing. Instead of reading "context clues" maybe ask them.
The point is I should not have to. They came to the event, were in the PSG, and were wearing PSG tags. It should be implied they are there to play. No "being Sherlock Holmes" necessary.Going to events does not mean playing. Instead of reading "context clues" maybe ask them.
Yup. I have been at events where all I did was sit in spec- due to imbalance, ping, or just lack of willingness to play.The point is I should not have to. They came to the event, were in the PSG, and were wearing PSG tags. It should be implied they are there to play. No "being Sherlock Holmes" necessary.Going to events does not mean playing. Instead of reading "context clues" maybe ask them.
(https://i.imgur.com/ebbqIQu.gif)
I hope you realize how udderly ridiculous that sounds. I dont think theres ever been a time in all of NW when some asked someone in their regiment:"are you coming to the event tonight?" and meant "are you gonna watch the event tonight?"
Ap0c it doesn't matter anymore. A regiment can do whatever it wants with its members including sitting them out if necessary or for tactical reasons. It's not against the rules and it may be unfair to 58e people sitting out but doesn't mean its unfair to the other team.
The question is though, why make it part of the rules? We've gone 5 seasons without that being a problem.Ap0c it doesn't matter anymore. A regiment can do whatever it wants with its members including sitting them out if necessary or for tactical reasons. It's not against the rules and it may be unfair to 58e people sitting out but doesn't mean its unfair to the other team.
Ok, can everyone stop bringing up the argument "its not against the rules". Thats exactly the point of this argument. It should be against the rules, which is why it still matters.
Yup. I have been at events where all I did was sit in spec- due to imbalance, ping, or just lack of willingness to play.The point is I should not have to. They came to the event, were in the PSG, and were wearing PSG tags. It should be implied they are there to play. No "being Sherlock Holmes" necessary.Going to events does not mean playing. Instead of reading "context clues" maybe ask them.
(https://i.imgur.com/ebbqIQu.gif)
I hope you realize how udderly ridiculous that sounds. I dont think theres ever been a time in all of NW when some asked someone in their regiment:"are you coming to the event tonight?" and meant "are you gonna watch the event tonight?"
The question is though, why make it part of the rules? We've gone 5 seasons without that being a problem.Ap0c it doesn't matter anymore. A regiment can do whatever it wants with its members including sitting them out if necessary or for tactical reasons. It's not against the rules and it may be unfair to 58e people sitting out but doesn't mean its unfair to the other team.
Ok, can everyone stop bringing up the argument "its not against the rules". Thats exactly the point of this argument. It should be against the rules, which is why it still matters.
It Shouldn't be against the rules if people want to limit how many they play for tactical reasons.
Okay but you have to realize that the competitive scene in NA Community is dying so maybe a reg like PSG or 45e wants to put there best competitive players to play in their matches instead of there nuubs, (Which they could have a smaller amount of competitive players then your reg) to have a better chance of winning.It Shouldn't be against the rules if people want to limit how many they play for tactical reasons.
I disagree, and ive already argued for over 2 pages why, so I see no reason why I should go over it again.
Okay but you have to realize that the competitive scene in NA Community is dying so maybe a reg like PSG or 45e wants to put there best competitive players to play in their matches instead of there nuubs, (Which they could have a smaller amount of competitive players then your reg) to have a better chance of winning.It Shouldn't be against the rules if people want to limit how many they play for tactical reasons.
I disagree, and ive already argued for over 2 pages why, so I see no reason why I should go over it again.
Personally, I believe that sitting some of your players to only play your best is a bit of a douche move. When you are playing competitively you should play all the people you have at your disposal (within the limit of what the other group has). If you are competing for the ability to say you are one of (or the best) NA/EU/AU whatever you should play all the members who are there.
Your all around skill in the regiment should be what you use to determine if your best whatever. If you have 10 really good guys and 15 shit guys and only play the 10 really good guys so you can win against a regiment with 20 average guys its kinda a douche thing to do.
It would be lovely if people would just takes 1v1s as friendly competitive fights so to just see how you are compared to other regiments in terms of skill and see what they need to improve (and where you didn't need an referee to make sure every rule is followed to the letter) instead of acting likes its a life or death situation where if you loose there's always some excuse to make or some way to try to cheat and get around rules or make it so the other team has a disadvantage.
However, we all know that isn't how the NW community works unless the groups fighting have been close friends for a while (and even then shit gets salty) so honestly I don't see it ever being against the rules. As I said before I believe its a douche move but not necessarily one that's gonna be against the rules.
A regiment has the right to decide who plays and who doesn't. It isn't against the rules to sit members that are otherwise available.
I personally do not agree with sitting players that can be played, but that is just me.
A regiment has the right to decide who plays and who doesn't. It isn't against the rules to sit members that are otherwise available.
I personally do not agree with sitting players that can be played, but that is just me.
You have the power to make it against the rules
just saying
A regiment has the right to decide who plays and who doesn't. It isn't against the rules to sit members that are otherwise available.
I personally do not agree with sitting players that can be played, but that is just me.
You have the power to make it against the rules
just saying
We do, but that doesn't mean we are going to.
A regiment has the right to decide who plays and who doesn't. It isn't against the rules to sit members that are otherwise available.Maybe add a rule where a regiment must inform the other regiment and the referee how many players (as in willing to play) they are going to have 15 minutes prior, allowing the other regiment to prepare accordingly.
I personally do not agree with sitting players that can be played, but that is just me.
Making rules for everything isin't a good solution in anyway, just be proactive and ask. Get half the reg leaders in NA to be proactive as well and bam its a culture change.A regiment has the right to decide who plays and who doesn't. It isn't against the rules to sit members that are otherwise available.Maybe add a rule where a regiment must inform the other regiment and the referee how many players (as in willing to play) they are going to have 15 minutes prior, allowing the other regiment to prepare accordingly.
I personally do not agree with sitting players that can be played, but that is just me.
You might ask why that would need to be a rule and not just ask the other team for their numbers but if regiments were to do that, they could still say 20 and only play 10. This doesn't limit the amount of dropping a regiment might have. In this way, a regiment would have to stick to a particular number that they themselves have set. I believe this is the most fair solution i can think of. Making it so regiments who might have higher numbers can plan accordingly but still allows regiments who only want skill in their line to do so. It's not a total solution but it's something i'm fine with.
Making rules for everything isin't a good solution in anyway, just be proactive and ask. Get half the reg leaders in NA to be proactive as well and bam its a culture change.A regiment has the right to decide who plays and who doesn't. It isn't against the rules to sit members that are otherwise available.Maybe add a rule where a regiment must inform the other regiment and the referee how many players (as in willing to play) they are going to have 15 minutes prior, allowing the other regiment to prepare accordingly.
I personally do not agree with sitting players that can be played, but that is just me.
You might ask why that would need to be a rule and not just ask the other team for their numbers but if regiments were to do that, they could still say 20 and only play 10. This doesn't limit the amount of dropping a regiment might have. In this way, a regiment would have to stick to a particular number that they themselves have set. I believe this is the most fair solution i can think of. Making it so regiments who might have higher numbers can plan accordingly but still allows regiments who only want skill in their line to do so. It's not a total solution but it's something i'm fine with.
I think this debate at the very least warrants a teamspeak discussion so we could address that tactic going forward. I think sitting out players purposefully should at least be addressed in SOME manner. Maybe not a full on ban of doing it, but at least have some guidelines about it.
your quotes make no sense to me, explanation ples? :DMaking rules for everything isin't a good solution in anyway, just be proactive and ask. Get half the reg leaders in NA to be proactive as well and bam its a culture change.A regiment has the right to decide who plays and who doesn't. It isn't against the rules to sit members that are otherwise available.Maybe add a rule where a regiment must inform the other regiment and the referee how many players (as in willing to play) they are going to have 15 minutes prior, allowing the other regiment to prepare accordingly.
I personally do not agree with sitting players that can be played, but that is just me.
You might ask why that would need to be a rule and not just ask the other team for their numbers but if regiments were to do that, they could still say 20 and only play 10. This doesn't limit the amount of dropping a regiment might have. In this way, a regiment would have to stick to a particular number that they themselves have set. I believe this is the most fair solution i can think of. Making it so regiments who might have higher numbers can plan accordingly but still allows regiments who only want skill in their line to do so. It's not a total solution but it's something i'm fine with.I think this debate at the very least warrants a teamspeak discussion so we could address that tactic going forward. I think sitting out players purposefully should at least be addressed in SOME manner. Maybe not a full on ban of doing it, but at least have some guidelines about it.
I think this debate at the very least warrants a teamspeak discussion so we could address that tactic going forward. I think sitting out players purposefully should at least be addressed in SOME manner. Maybe not a full on ban of doing it, but at least have some guidelines about it.
Pretty much our experience in NANWL so far:
O man it's the 58e who have like 20-25 guys on, better drop to like 10 guys as soon as we all join the server and make 15+ people sit in spec and make this a 10v10 groupfighting match with shooting.
Nice reg m8m8m8
Pretty much our experience in NANWL so far:
O man it's the 58e who have like 20-25 guys on, better drop to like 10 guys as soon as we all join the server and make 15+ people sit in spec and make this a 10v10 groupfighting match with shooting.
Nice reg m8m8m8
How to fix your problem: ask the leader over steam how many people they will be bringing, and plan accordingly. mystery solved
Well if this continues to be a trend, this league might as well rename to a 10v10 league and completely throw away the purpose of the league. It should be testing the regiment's full capabilities.WHY CANT WE BE FRIENDS
Well if this continues to be a trend, this league might as well rename to a 10v10 league and completely throw away the purpose of the league. It should be testing the regiment's full capabilities.Then would u rather test the capabilities will lower numbered good players or more players but less-skilled as a whole?
I can not fathom how a regiment as established as the 58e (maybe its because lawbringer is in charge) does not understand something as common as having to balance as a large regiment. The 58e is the 58e. The PSG is NOT the 58e. The 34e is NOT the 58e. You can not expect an enemy to mirror your numbers and its on YOU as the leader to prepare your roster. Its not the league admins place to force leaders to play members they do not think are ready so the 58e is happy.
As i said, this league is about who is the best regiment, not who has the best players.
I can not fathom how a regiment as established as the 58e (maybe its because lawbringer is in charge) does not understand something as common as having to balance as a large regiment. The 58e is the 58e. The PSG is NOT the 58e. The 34e is NOT the 58e. You can not expect an enemy to mirror your numbers and its on YOU as the leader to prepare your roster. Its not the league admins place to force leaders to play members they do not think are ready so the 58e is happy.
We understand if the other team is simply not able to supply the numbers, but purposely dropping to a lower number isn't what the league should stand for.As i said, this league is about who is the best regiment, not who has the best players.
Do we see this shit in EU NWL?
Nope
not at all
As i said, this league is about who is the best regiment, not who has the best players. I would rather all your good and bad face all our good and bad.Maybe we don't wanna play all our players. Why cant we just play the ones we choose to play is that against the rules?
Because EU has a Bigger CommunityI can not fathom how a regiment as established as the 58e (maybe its because lawbringer is in charge) does not understand something as common as having to balance as a large regiment. The 58e is the 58e. The PSG is NOT the 58e. The 34e is NOT the 58e. You can not expect an enemy to mirror your numbers and its on YOU as the leader to prepare your roster. Its not the league admins place to force leaders to play members they do not think are ready so the 58e is happy.
We understand if the other team is simply not able to supply the numbers, but purposely dropping to a lower number isn't what the league should stand for.As i said, this league is about who is the best regiment, not who has the best players.
Do we see this shit in EU NWL?
Nope
not at all
EU has it nice nd ez
I can not fathom how a regiment as established as the 58e (maybe its because lawbringer is in charge) does not understand something as common as having to balance as a large regiment. The 58e is the 58e. The PSG is NOT the 58e. The 34e is NOT the 58e. You can not expect an enemy to mirror your numbers and its on YOU as the leader to prepare your roster. Its not the league admins place to force leaders to play members they do not think are ready so the 58e is happy.
We understand if the other team is simply not able to supply the numbers, but purposely dropping to a lower number isn't what the league should stand for.
As i said, this league is about who is the best regiment, not who has the best players.
Do we see this shit in EU NWL?If you are implying that IN ALL THE EU LEAGUE MATCHES, not a SINGLE regiment has sat a person has ever been sat - I really would like to know where you get your stats from.
Nope
not at all
If you are implying that IN ALL THE EU LEAGUE MATCHES, not a SINGLE regiment has sat a person has ever been sat - I really would like to know where you get your stats from.We aren't referring to a single person grim, we are referring to several people being sat out at once.
We aren't concerned with those people Grim. We are concerned with the members who can play, want to play but their leader will not allow them to because they want to even the odds with their enemy, forcing the other team to drop members as well. When you have 16 people sitting out for no apparent reason besides ONE regiment leader said he wants to sit those players out, we have a problem.
I see it more as, we shouldn't be forced to drop players if the other team can pull more in.
As I said earlier, the way the rules are now it's the best 10 players wins. You could have the next best 30 players and you'd still lose 10-0 every single time to a regiment that has the best 10 + 20 shit players. That's utterly stupid grim. You know that.
Then this is officially a 10 v 10 tournament.As I said earlier, the way the rules are now it's the best 10 players wins. You could have the next best 30 players and you'd still lose 10-0 every single time to a regiment that has the best 10 + 20 shit players. That's utterly stupid grim. You know that.
Whether its stupid or not I do not care, but there is nothing you can do about it. If a regiment has 100 people, 10 of which are gods and the rest are awful - then that leader will only notify those players of their match. When those other 90 dont show up you are still going to have to balance accordingly.
I am a member of the 15th Yorkshire Regiment of Foot and have played in multiple of their matches. They are among the top 3 regiments in EU, and they have never faced an opponent who purposely drops down to only play in the best 10 players.
We have 2 players who have under 50 hours in the game and they both have played in multiple matches. They are a part of our regiment and they should be played. We even swap out our more veteran players in order to allow everyone to take part in the match.
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198041298673/games/?tab=recent
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198072039197/games/?tab=recent
imo we should raise the minimum attendance to 15
Then this is officially a 10 v 10 tournament.As I said earlier, the way the rules are now it's the best 10 players wins. You could have the next best 30 players and you'd still lose 10-0 every single time to a regiment that has the best 10 + 20 shit players. That's utterly stupid grim. You know that.
Whether its stupid or not I do not care, but there is nothing you can do about it. If a regiment has 100 people, 10 of which are gods and the rest are awful - then that leader will only notify those players of their match. When those other 90 dont show up you are still going to have to balance accordingly.
11 v 10. You can plus one :pThen this is officially a 10 v 10 tournament.As I said earlier, the way the rules are now it's the best 10 players wins. You could have the next best 30 players and you'd still lose 10-0 every single time to a regiment that has the best 10 + 20 shit players. That's utterly stupid grim. You know that.
Whether its stupid or not I do not care, but there is nothing you can do about it. If a regiment has 100 people, 10 of which are gods and the rest are awful - then that leader will only notify those players of their match. When those other 90 dont show up you are still going to have to balance accordingly.
Then this is officially a 10 v 10 tournament.As I said earlier, the way the rules are now it's the best 10 players wins. You could have the next best 30 players and you'd still lose 10-0 every single time to a regiment that has the best 10 + 20 shit players. That's utterly stupid grim. You know that.
Whether its stupid or not I do not care, but there is nothing you can do about it. If a regiment has 100 people, 10 of which are gods and the rest are awful - then that leader will only notify those players of their match. When those other 90 dont show up you are still going to have to balance accordingly.
Very useful input. Are we done with this discussion then? Or was that just a pout, followed up by you bringing up the issue again tomorrow?
I am a member of the 15th Yorkshire Regiment of Foot and have played in multiple of their matches. They are among the top 3 regiments in EU, and they have never faced an opponent who purposely drops down to only play in the best 10 players.Raising the minimum attendance to 15 could be problematic in later seasons if we do have more seasons. Smaller regiments will not be able to participate. A rule change that large just for such a small problem, which by the way, only you seem to be calling it a problem, should not happen.
We have 2 players who have under 50 hours in the game and they both have played in multiple matches. They are a part of our regiment and they should be played. We even swap out our more veteran players in order to allow everyone to take part in the match.
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198041298673/games/?tab=recent
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198072039197/games/?tab=recent
imo we should raise the minimum attendance to 15.
As for Grimsight, you are not even part of this league anymore.
Then this is officially a 10 v 10 tournament.As I said earlier, the way the rules are now it's the best 10 players wins. You could have the next best 30 players and you'd still lose 10-0 every single time to a regiment that has the best 10 + 20 shit players. That's utterly stupid grim. You know that.
Whether its stupid or not I do not care, but there is nothing you can do about it. If a regiment has 100 people, 10 of which are gods and the rest are awful - then that leader will only notify those players of their match. When those other 90 dont show up you are still going to have to balance accordingly.
Very useful input. Are we done with this discussion then? Or was that just a pout, followed up by you bringing up the issue again tomorrow?
Grim you are being very stubborn and even more stupid.
^^^^^Then this is officially a 10 v 10 tournament.As I said earlier, the way the rules are now it's the best 10 players wins. You could have the next best 30 players and you'd still lose 10-0 every single time to a regiment that has the best 10 + 20 shit players. That's utterly stupid grim. You know that.
Whether its stupid or not I do not care, but there is nothing you can do about it. If a regiment has 100 people, 10 of which are gods and the rest are awful - then that leader will only notify those players of their match. When those other 90 dont show up you are still going to have to balance accordingly.
Very useful input. Are we done with this discussion then? Or was that just a pout, followed up by you bringing up the issue again tomorrow?
Grim you are being very stubborn and even more stupid.
not really relevant at all, I could say the same thing about the 58e. You guys are trying to force your ideas and regiment philosophy on the rest of the league.
Guys there is no need to call each other names over this. We could have a discussion on teamspeak about it with cheesey. For now though, i think we should just leave it be.
We are simply stating our opinion on a matter that does effect the overall experience with this league and are suggesting certain changes that may be beneficial. You are the one who has no business being here giving your input and insulting us.
I am a member of the 15th Yorkshire Regiment of Foot and have played in multiple of their matches. They are among the top 3 regiments in EU, and they have never faced an opponent who purposely drops down to only play in the best 10 players.I was part of that regiment. I was sat for an NWL match because my lag skill spam was not GOOD enough. Your point is wrong.
We have 2 players who have under 50 hours in the game and they both have played in multiple matches. They are a part of our regiment and they should be played. We even swap out our more veteran players in order to allow everyone to take part in the match.
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198041298673/games/?tab=recent
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198072039197/games/?tab=recent
imo we should raise the minimum attendance to 15.
As for Grimsight, you are not even part of this league anymore.
I am a member of the 15th Yorkshire Regiment of Foot and have played in multiple of their matches. They are among the top 3 regiments in EU, and they have never faced an opponent who purposely drops down to only play in the best 10 players.I was part of that regiment. I was sat for an NWL match because my lag skill spam was not GOOD enough. Your point is wrong.
We have 2 players who have under 50 hours in the game and they both have played in multiple matches. They are a part of our regiment and they should be played. We even swap out our more veteran players in order to allow everyone to take part in the match.
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198041298673/games/?tab=recent
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198072039197/games/?tab=recent
imo we should raise the minimum attendance to 15.
As for Grimsight, you are not even part of this league anymore.
Cool, i'm sitting at home now "bud"I am a member of the 15th Yorkshire Regiment of Foot and have played in multiple of their matches. They are among the top 3 regiments in EU, and they have never faced an opponent who purposely drops down to only play in the best 10 players.I was part of that regiment. I was sat for an NWL match because my lag skill spam was not GOOD enough. Your point is wrong.
We have 2 players who have under 50 hours in the game and they both have played in multiple matches. They are a part of our regiment and they should be played. We even swap out our more veteran players in order to allow everyone to take part in the match.
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198041298673/games/?tab=recent
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198072039197/games/?tab=recent
imo we should raise the minimum attendance to 15.
As for Grimsight, you are not even part of this league anymore.
Well I am in it now bud
Okay we agrued enough lets change the subject Pls. We don't need another TNWL Thread :P.speaking TNWL, did the 75th/22nd ever get their money?
Probably NotOkay we agrued enough lets change the subject Pls. We don't need another TNWL Thread :P.speaking TNWL, did the 75th/22nd ever get their money?
You guys should take this discussion elsewhere, there will be no rule change. Regiments are free to play who they wish.
You guys should take this discussion elsewhere, there will be no rule change. Regiments are free to play who they wish.
The 58e has been spamming their ideas on this thread even after cheesey said he wasn't changing/adding any rules lolATLEAST THEY DIDNT STEAL SIGS HUE ?
sorry :( I thought it was a cool sig I change it now :(The 58e has been spamming their ideas on this thread even after cheesey said he wasn't changing/adding any rules lolATLEAST THEY DIDNT STEAL SIGS HUE ?Spoilerstay fucking classy NA[close]
What Grim said. It is impossible to enforce any kind of rule concerning attendance. If we implement a rule, "every player in the server has to be played", then the regiments not wanting to play certain players will simply keep those players out of the server. We can not police everyone's teamspeaks, rosters, etc.. This issue did pop up before. The 71st faced the 3eVolt and they sat out multiple people. When asked to spawn them in they simply sent them offline. Obviously those people could have been played but we can not prove that, perhaps they really had to leave. It is annoying but something that you have to deal with. As for the point that this is turning into a 10v10 League. Not too many regiments that signed up for the League field more than 15-20 people. Actually I would say only 2 do (63e and 58e). Even the 71st has shrunk quite a bit and a high attendance for us would be 18 or so (I have not attended any events recently but our roster is like 30 people). Last but not least, you signed up for this League agreeing to the existing rules. Yes, you have the right to complain and want to change rules, but at the same time you did agree to the ruleset and more importantly to complying with admin's decisions. Cheesey stated there will be no rule changes, case closed.
71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
63e vs. 45e Sunday 9/20 815estSo I believe this probably got buried in the chaos, you'd have to ask Nathan if we got a ref yet but just in case... ;)
Will need ref
c u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
c u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
ye das tru im awfulc u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
k if theo is gonna show, i guess itll be 4ez
(https://i.imgur.com/Oq5ARQb.gif)
ye das tru im awfulc u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
k if theo is gonna show, i guess itll be 4ez
(https://i.imgur.com/Oq5ARQb.gif)
russian and theo will kill our line before you get the chanceye das tru im awfulc u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
k if theo is gonna show, i guess itll be 4ez
(https://i.imgur.com/Oq5ARQb.gif)
ye das tru im awfulc u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
k if theo is gonna show, i guess itll be 4ez
(https://i.imgur.com/Oq5ARQb.gif)
I'm pretty sure Swerp is the record holder for most cringe worthy team kills in NANWL matches
Maybe ill finally be #1 at something?ye das tru im awfulc u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
k if theo is gonna show, i guess itll be 4ez
(https://i.imgur.com/Oq5ARQb.gif)
I'm pretty sure Swerp is the record holder for most cringe worthy team kills in NANWL matches
Babyj and Walter make some pretty convincing cases
Not if I have anything to say about itMaybe ill finally be #1 at something?Spoilerye das tru im awfulc u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
k if theo is gonna show, i guess itll be 4ez
(https://i.imgur.com/Oq5ARQb.gif)
I'm pretty sure Swerp is the record holder for most cringe worthy team kills in NANWL matches
Babyj and Walter make some pretty convincing cases[close]
why you gotta steal everything from me?Not if I have anything to say about itMaybe ill finally be #1 at something?Spoilerye das tru im awfulc u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
k if theo is gonna show, i guess itll be 4ez
(https://i.imgur.com/Oq5ARQb.gif)
I'm pretty sure Swerp is the record holder for most cringe worthy team kills in NANWL matches
Babyj and Walter make some pretty convincing cases[close]
There can only be one worstwhy you gotta steal everything from me?Not if I have anything to say about itMaybe ill finally be #1 at something?Spoilerye das tru im awfulc u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
k if theo is gonna show, i guess itll be 4ez
(https://i.imgur.com/Oq5ARQb.gif)
I'm pretty sure Swerp is the record holder for most cringe worthy team kills in NANWL matches
Babyj and Walter make some pretty convincing cases[close]
There can only be one worstwhy you gotta steal everything from me?Not if I have anything to say about itMaybe ill finally be #1 at something?Spoilerye das tru im awfulc u there71st vs 58e on Sunday @8pm EST on 71st_Official3 ez
k if theo is gonna show, i guess itll be 4ez
(https://i.imgur.com/Oq5ARQb.gif)
I'm pretty sure Swerp is the record holder for most cringe worthy team kills in NANWL matches
Babyj and Walter make some pretty convincing cases[close]
Maybe you guys should do a last to 7 to determine who's worse.We already know who'd win that
NA is strict?
NA is strict cuz we have swerpSorry
He's had that for a while
OH GAWD.lol, i made that for him.
(https://i.imgur.com/76dugdq.png)
THE WEEB SIGS ARE SPREADING.
He's had that for a while
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/0f/72/5c/0f725ce9ac42ce6b4c31a90ecc27f4ee.jpg)
HES LIKE 12. HE WAS SO YOUNG! Y HAVE U DONE THIS GOD?! WHYYYYY?!1!
(https://i.imgur.com/76dugdq.png)an attractive female? Swerp are you felling ok?
What the fuck is that shit then?
you are a weeb by default if the first thing ou think about that picture is an attractive female(https://i.imgur.com/76dugdq.png)an attractive female? Swerp are you felling ok?
What the fuck is that shit then?
right?you are a weeb by default if the first thing ou think about that picture is an attractive female(https://i.imgur.com/76dugdq.png)an attractive female? Swerp are you felling ok?
What the fuck is that shit then?
58e isn't the only code for weeb, Nappy. There are closet weebs scattered throughout the community.ED....WARD...
Remember: acceptance is the first step to remission
I mean if I was a weeb I'd be in the 58e just sayingThat's what im saying
A year of under-dogesFUCK THE 63E FUCK THE 3EVOLT FUCK THE 71ST
we're the best damn regiment in the game boys.A year of under-dogesFUCK THE 63E FUCK THE 3EVOLT FUCK THE 71ST
we're the best damn regiment in the game boys.A year of under-dogesFUCK THE 63E FUCK THE 3EVOLT FUCK THE 71ST
ur the best regiment redredwe're the best damn regiment in the game boys.A year of under-dogesFUCK THE 63E FUCK THE 3EVOLT FUCK THE 71ST
ya cuz all the gud ones disbANDEEd
So I'm a little confused, if the 63e hasn't played the 58e or 71st yet for NWL why aren't we playing them this week since all 3 have the week off? I'd assume it would be easier to have them play and get it out of the way instead of having 2 extra regiments have a free week that has to be completed later? If there is a logical reason could it be explained I just don't understand it yet?
LIR 8 - 2 PSGLIR is getting good beating 45e and PSG they are going ham!
GG! Fun to ref, some intense moments.
LIR 8 - 2 PSGLIR is getting good beating 45e and PSG they are going ham!
GG! Fun to ref, some intense moments.
league so small now wtfBecause Dead
league so small now wtf1st Season: 15
Good match to the PSG! Those were some close rounds!GG it was a close fight!
GG 45e and PSGLOL that was funny af. #LawGetsBanned2k15 8)
Twas fun to ref.. if only Lawbringer didn't impersonate a 45e member tho :/
How do you manage to let someone slip into your reg and impersonate without knowing /).-GG 45e and PSGLOL that was funny af. #LawGetsBanned2k15 8)
Twas fun to ref.. if only Lawbringer didn't impersonate a 45e member tho :/
How do you manage to let someone slip into your reg and impersonate without knowing /).-GG 45e and PSGLOL that was funny af. #LawGetsBanned2k15 8)
Twas fun to ref.. if only Lawbringer didn't impersonate a 45e member tho :/
How do you manage to let someone slip into your reg and impersonate without knowing /).-GG 45e and PSGLOL that was funny af. #LawGetsBanned2k15 8)
Twas fun to ref.. if only Lawbringer didn't impersonate a 45e member tho :/
He didn't slip in without being noticed he joined in spec with 45e Cadet tags we didn't know him and he was banned a few moments after he joined, then after he messaged me and asked why the ban when I didn't even know who he was.
How do you manage to let someone slip into your reg and impersonate without knowing /).-GG 45e and PSGLOL that was funny af. #LawGetsBanned2k15 8)
Twas fun to ref.. if only Lawbringer didn't impersonate a 45e member tho :/
He didn't slip in without being noticed he joined in spec with 45e Cadet tags we didn't know him and he was banned a few moments after he joined, then after he messaged me and asked why the ban when I didn't even know who he was.
So, what you're saying is, Lawbringer did not slip in without being noticed, you and your guys just didn't know he was in there, and no idea who he was until he got banned and messaged you. Ok. I see no problem in this statement, carry on.
How do you manage to let someone slip into your reg and impersonate without knowing /).-GG 45e and PSGLOL that was funny af. #LawGetsBanned2k15 8)
Twas fun to ref.. if only Lawbringer didn't impersonate a 45e member tho :/
He didn't slip in without being noticed he joined in spec with 45e Cadet tags we didn't know him and he was banned a few moments after he joined, then after he messaged me and asked why the ban when I didn't even know who he was.
So, what you're saying is, Lawbringer did not slip in without being noticed, you and your guys just didn't know he was in there, and no idea who he was until he got banned and messaged you. Ok. I see no problem in this statement, carry on.
Good fight to the 71st tonight! 8-2 45e win
lelGood fight to the 71st tonight! 8-2 45e winSpoiler(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Freplycandy.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FWill-Ferrell-Holy-Shit-Reaction-Face.png&hash=ebbcfd2f073196e2dfc9b6673313c613256743b6)[close]
Ahh alright I thought he played or somethingHow do you manage to let someone slip into your reg and impersonate without knowing /).-GG 45e and PSGLOL that was funny af. #LawGetsBanned2k15 8)
Twas fun to ref.. if only Lawbringer didn't impersonate a 45e member tho :/
He didn't slip in without being noticed he joined in spec with 45e Cadet tags we didn't know him and he was banned a few moments after he joined, then after he messaged me and asked why the ban when I didn't even know who he was.
So, what you're saying is, Lawbringer did not slip in without being noticed, you and your guys just didn't know he was in there, and no idea who he was until he got banned and messaged you. Ok. I see no problem in this statement, carry on.
Let me explain it in a way you can understand, he joined the server and was In spec for not even a minute before he was banned and after he messaged me and asked why the ban when I didn't even know who he was.
Good fight to the 71st tonight! 8-2 45e winWe Won Oh Snap!
I told cheesey to stop playing life because it was ruining his NWHis gf led for us a couple of times. Tbh she was better than skinny
Nah she just meleed on all of your accounts every round, which explains why we couldn't melee xD.I told cheesey to stop playing life because it was ruining his NWHis gf led for us a couple of times. Tbh she was better than skinny
idk what to say to that but damn son.Nah she just meleed on all of your accounts every round, which explains why we couldn't melee xD.I told cheesey to stop playing life because it was ruining his NWHis gf led for us a couple of times. Tbh she was better than skinny
63e vs. PSG
Sunday October 18th
815est
nothen gtfo
U both leave because Plebs aren't allowed on this thread!nothen gtfo
No tears now, only dreams.
bamp
I mean he's active in 71stbamp
He's alive! :o
nah he shows up once in awhile but that's itI mean he's active in 71stbamp
He's alive! :o
I'm pretty sure that's how you can describe everyone in the 71stnah he shows up once in awhile but that's itI mean he's active in 71stbamp
He's alive! :o
This week pretty much decides who wins NANWL! MUCH EXCITE!75th WIll Win NWL Kek
This week pretty much decides who wins NANWL! MUCH EXCITE!75th WIll Win NWL Kek
This week pretty much decides who wins NANWL! MUCH EXCITE!75th WIll Win NWL Kek
NWL doesn't allow double reggers so they will have like a 5 man line
No double reggers since we won TNWL lol didn't have to use em to beat u or 71st but the past twas the past.Also Chan days. We don't need double reggers didn't need em to beat 71st nor yo ass so we cool. Stay salty NW community
Stahp, SquireNo double reggers since we won TNWL lol didn't have to use em to beat u or 71st but the past twas the past.Also Chan days. We don't need double reggers didn't need em to beat 71st nor yo ass so we cool. Stay salty NW community
Stahp, SquireNo double reggers since we won TNWL lol didn't have to use em to beat u or 71st but the past twas the past.Also Chan days. We don't need double reggers didn't need em to beat 71st nor yo ass so we cool. Stay salty NW community
Welcome the cancer that was worst then the 58e somehow. :pYou're talking about 71st right?
He talkin bout every reg that ever hit NWWelcome the cancer that was worst then the 58e somehow. :pYou're talking about 71st right?
calm down gents, save the salt until after we win.
can I join the 91st? I swears I no double regIf U wanna Join 91st Add [134e]Bosian On steam
so why did I add [63e]Karth? im so confusedcan I join the 91st? I swears I no double regIf U wanna Join 91st Add [134e]Bosian On steam
IDk Bc Law is in 12th not 91st Duhso why did I add [63e]Karth? im so confusedcan I join the 91st? I swears I no double regIf U wanna Join 91st Add [134e]Bosian On steam
The 63e is not responding to my attempts in setting up our match. >:(did you try contacting [63e]Karth on steam?
The 63e is not responding to my attempts in setting up our match. >:(did you try contacting [63e]Karth on steam?
Just wanted to celebrate the year anniversary of my ban. Too bad unbans arent a thing.
Just wanted to celebrate the year anniversary of my ban. Too bad competitive regs on nw dont exist anymore
Just wanted to celebrate the year anniversary of my ban. Too bad competitive regs on nw dont exist anymoreDont worry my friend we're here to end this game once and for all.
Just wanted to celebrate the year anniversary of my ban. Too bad competitive regs on nw dont exist anymoreDont worry my friend we're here to end this game once and for all.
Just wanted to celebrate the year anniversary of my ban. Too bad competitive regs on nw dont exist anymoreDont worry my friend we're here to end this game once and for all.
Who are you? Who the heck is "we"?
Just wanted to celebrate the year anniversary of my ban. Too bad competitive regs on nw dont exist anymoreDont worry my friend we're here to end this game once and for all.
Who are you? Who the heck is "we"?
It's the 75th......they have returned... God help us the cancer will be too much
Cancer overcomes allJust wanted to celebrate the year anniversary of my ban. Too bad competitive regs on nw dont exist anymoreDont worry my friend we're here to end this game once and for all.
Who are you? Who the heck is "we"?
It's the 75th......they have returned... God help us the cancer will be too much
Oh. Thats a shame. I thought an actual competitive regiment was returning.
That feel when you tell the 63e that you are bringing 30+ and they say they are only going to bring 20They know our regiment has more solid players than theirs
Why is purposely benching regimental members a trend this season?
And the people who want to play but are benched should just join another regiment cuz dat shits just ridiculous
Read my 1st post on thread page 58 for an explanation of how things go.
I don't recall ever telling anyone how many we 'plan' to bring; as I have stated previously, I tend to ask how many the other regiment has before the event so we may match their numbers (+1, usually). That being said, I don't even know how many 'plan' on even coming, but I sure not going to make anyone come that doesn't want to and/or not required to if we're under numbers. Average attendance on weekends is ~70, doesn't mean I am going to bring all 70 obviously. I'm not even including some of our EU side that want to join in too. However, I will say that we did learn from previous seasons that anything over 25 has tend to make things much less manageable, like having 50 v 50 (or whatever it was) against Stox and the 54th. We really didn't like doing that.
Make sure to at least try and post statements/opinions/whatever with facts, or some type of evidence; tends to make things much less arguable and more sensible.
71st has disbanded and 2ySG have been kicked for inactivity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNyKDI9pn0Q71st has disbanded and 2ySG have been kicked for inactivity.
Its been real
Read my 1st post on thread page 58 for an explanation of how things go.
I don't recall ever telling anyone how many we 'plan' to bring; as I have stated previously, I tend to ask how many the other regiment has before the event so we may match their numbers (+1, usually). That being said, I don't even know how many 'plan' on even coming, but I sure not going to make anyone come that doesn't want to and/or not required to if we're under numbers. Average attendance on weekends is ~70, doesn't mean I am going to bring all 70 obviously. I'm not even including some of our EU side that want to join in too. However, I will say that we did learn from previous seasons that anything over 25 has tend to make things much less manageable, like having 50 v 50 (or whatever it was) against Stox and the 54th. We really didn't like doing that.
Make sure to at least try and post statements/opinions/whatever with facts, or some type of evidence; tends to make things much less arguable and more sensible.
How are lines over 25 not manageable? The only thing that happens in lines is they follow you when you say follow, stop when you say stop, shoot when you say shoot, and charge when you say charge.
You aren't forced to balance numbers, but it is a vast shame that a regiment as large as the 63e would purposely not play as many players as they can.
Your fedora wearing skills are far more vast than mine.
NWL now a 10v10 league
You aren't forced to balance numbers, but it is a vast shame that a regiment as large as the 63e would purposely not play as many players as they can.
Your fedora wearing skills are far more vast than mine.
NWL now a 10v10 league
SpoilerRead my 1st post on thread page 58 for an explanation of how things go.
I don't recall ever telling anyone how many we 'plan' to bring; as I have stated previously, I tend to ask how many the other regiment has before the event so we may match their numbers (+1, usually). That being said, I don't even know how many 'plan' on even coming, but I sure not going to make anyone come that doesn't want to and/or not required to if we're under numbers. Average attendance on weekends is ~70, doesn't mean I am going to bring all 70 obviously. I'm not even including some of our EU side that want to join in too. However, I will say that we did learn from previous seasons that anything over 25 has tend to make things much less manageable, like having 50 v 50 (or whatever it was) against Stox and the 54th. We really didn't like doing that.
Make sure to at least try and post statements/opinions/whatever with facts, or some type of evidence; tends to make things much less arguable and more sensible.
How are lines over 25 not manageable? The only thing that happens in lines is they follow you when you say follow, stop when you say stop, shoot when you say shoot, and charge when you say charge.[close]
A few seasons ago (whenever the 54th was actually around), we (due to Karth's suggestion) decided that 50 v 50's in NWL with two lines was literally too much. So it was better off for us to just field one line of 25 instead of two lines of 50. Honestly, it shouldn't be a big deal, as it only applied to regiments that brought over 30 in NWLs. Personally, I think a 30-man line is a little too large, and would prefer to do 20 or 25. Secondly, we really like to have the luxury of having volunteered extras to swap in/out when we can if need be. As far as I know, if we would only field 11, but bring 30, that would be an issue maybe. Not against the rules, but slightly unfair. However, I don't see any issue of bringing only 25 even if our opponent brought more. Once again, I cannot guarantee we'll be able to bring 30 to the NWL, as well as the fact thatI will not force anyone to come just to balance to our opponents' numbers.
Edit: In my opinion this shouldn't actually even apply to any of the current regiments in the NWL, so I don't know what the issue is here, unless a regiment brings 40-50 there should not be an issue.
Well, you just said average attendance to your events on weekends is ~70, so I think I have a perfect idea of just how big your regiment is. Because of this large attendance, I would be very surprised if over half those people declined a competitive linebattle. As I said earlier, I would be willing to bet my college education that you could get over 30 willing people to come to a 1v1 linebattle if you scheduled it right and planned it so people could attend.
So...... To chill things out a bit.... Who wants to take bets on this Sunday's 1v1?
I bet 50 memes that someone will lose ;)
Is there seriously only 5 regiments left?
So it begins, the 91st vs the 63e carried by the 71stHopefully, it'd be nice to have a larger 1v1 :-*
now that they joined 63e you should be able to bring 30 no? :^)
So it begins, the 91st vs the 63e carried by the 71st
now that they joined 63e you should be able to bring 30 no? :^)
So it begins, the 91st vs the 63e carried by the 71stdont worry the worst 71st joined the 91st ;)
now that they joined 63e you should be able to bring 30 no? :^)
0-10 dream BabyJ.So it begins, the 91st vs the 63e carried by the 71stdont worry the worst 71st joined the 91st ;)
now that they joined 63e you should be able to bring 30 no? :^)
will throw for skins0-10 dream BabyJ.So it begins, the 91st vs the 63e carried by the 71stdont worry the worst 71st joined the 91st ;)
now that they joined 63e you should be able to bring 30 no? :^)
0-10 dream.
RIP Game.Is there seriously only 5 regiments left?
People been saying it since 2013 but really it's coming true... game is dying.
RIP Game.Is there seriously only 5 regiments left?
People been saying it since 2013 but really it's coming true... game is dying.
Guys c'mon, we don't need to be shit posting. These last couple pages have been nothing but salt. The community is dying, we don't need the last greatest moments of it to be constant arguments. Tonight the 91st go up against the 63e (now with the 71st), it will be a good match, you all should come and watch it :)
Also, cheesey, i'm still offering to be a moderator.
That was probably the best linebattle ive seen in years.
Just curious cause I thought this was a problem earlier.I believe that was only TNWL, with TNWL you had to ask to transfer them from reg to reg. I don't see anything in the rules for NANWL about it though so I'm not 100% sure
Aren't you only supposed to be able to play for one regiment per season? Or was that just TNWL
Jackie is an actual modI am an actual mod, but no thanks. Do not want to take this over again.
He is around
That was probably the best linebattle ive seen in years.
Also the 63e vs 91st match is under review and will be discussed as soon as Nappy comes back online.Why?
Rematch?to bad there's no reason for a rematch :( (at least for NWl)Spoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFLJVYXQIDM[close]
Pls do. I wanna go to itRematch?to bad there's no reason for a rematch :( (at least for NWl)Spoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFLJVYXQIDM[close]