Roster Rules - The roster limit is fixed to 7 players, with 5 players from the main line-up and 2 substitutes. - You don't need to specify who is part of the main line-up and who is a substitute while applying for the tournament as every player can be switched in-between rounds and matches, independently. - You roster can only consist of players part of the same regiment, up to 50% at max. Meaning if your team consists in 7 players, only three can be in the same regiment, no more. - Players have to be signed up with their community names. Roleplay names are tolerated so long as anyone can clearly identify the player(s) behind them. - A player can only be featured on one single roster. - Captains are required to sign-up all their players and themselves with a unique GUID. Teams which do not provide a roster with a unique GUID for each of their members won't be accepted for this tournament. Such GUID can be found on the Cavalry_Groupfighting server. - Captains can add players up to three hours before the start of the tournament. After that, the roster will be locked and no more changes will be accepted. [close] Match Rules - Group stage matches and Quarter Finals of the knockout stage will be FT5. Semi-finals and bronze match will be FT5. Grand-final will be FT7. - Every player has to play with the name they have been signed-up as. Variations can be allowed, as long as we can still identify who you are. - Every player has to wear the tag of their team. - Players which are part of the same team may not use identical in-game faces. - You may only spawn in once your team's name is called. - You may only enter the arena if you are playing. - Substitutes can spawn in but will be expected to obey by the rules and not disturb the on-going matches. - Captains are expected to type 'R' or 'Ready' in the chat before every round so that the referee can make the round go 'live'. - Hussar is the only class allowed. - The sword is the only weapon allowed. - Melee speed will be on medium. [close] Behaviour Rules - Captains are to ensure their players obey by the rules. - Players are expected to behave with certain standards and act in a respectful manner. - No intentional teamkilling outside of the arenas. - If you are a substitute, don't interrupt the on-going matches by jumping on the fences, running around (with flags or not), punching each other's, etc. [close] |
Team Application Steam (Captain): Link PlaceHolder Team Name: Name PlaceHolder Team Tag: Tag PlaceHolder Players: Player 1 - GUID | Player 2 - GUID | Player 3 - GUID | Player 4 - GUID Did you read and accept the rules? Yes/No [close] | Referee Application Steam: Nickname: Why would you like to become a referee: Prior experience (If any): [close] | Free Agent Application Steam: Nickname: GUID: Nationality: Past teams (If any): [close] |
Team 1 Team Name: wookies^wb Team Tag: wookies~ Team Captain(s): Lindblom (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198038262904/) Roster:
[close] | Team 2 Team Name: Cereal Killers Team Tag: CR_ Team Captain(s): Dokletian (https://steamcommunity.com/id/dokiiiiiiiii/) Roster:
[close] | Team 3 Team Name: Hot Wheels Equitation Team Tag: HWE_ Team Captain(s): Treiz (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Treizz/) Roster:
[close] | Team 4 Team Name: Purple Cobras Team Tag: PC_ Team Captain(s): Jellyking (https://steamcommunity.com/id/JellyKing21/) Roster:
[close] | Team 5 Team Name: Bad Vibe Hussars Team Tag: BVH70_ Team Captain(s): Quinn (https://steamcommunity.com/id/quinn26) Roster:
[close] | Team 6 Team Name: HOMOSEXUALS Team Tag: HOMO*S_ Team Captain(s): TBA Roster:
[close] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Team 7 Team Name: Monkeys without sticks Team Tag: MONKEYS_ Team Captain(s): Jesu (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198387539734) Roster:
[close] | Team 8 Team Name: Not Only Polish Team Tag: NOP_ Team Captain(s): LaPierre (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198015290096) Roster:
[close] | Team 9 Team Name: Muffins Team Tag: TBA Team Captain(s): Apollo (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198086107639/) Roster:
[close] | Team 10 Team Name: Average Joe's Team Tag: AJ_ Team Captain(s): Erik (https://steamcommunity.com/id/ErikleRouge) & Cage (https://steamcommunity.com/id/8thcage/) Roster:
[close] | Team 11 Team Name: Jorvik Viking Centre Team Tag: Jrvk_ Team Captain(s): USE4life (https://steamcommunity.com/id/USE4life/) Roster:
[close] | Team 12 Team Name: Animals Team Tag: AnimalName_ Team Captain(s): Coco_Ayala (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Coco_AyalaNW/) Roster:
[close] |
Free Agents [close] |
- You roster can only consist of players part of the same regiment, up to 50% at max. Meaning if your team consists in 7 players, only three can be in the same regiment, no more.
This shit for cav?R E A D
Reading tournament discriptions isn't my strength :(This shit for cav?R E A DSpoileryes >:([close]
I even highlighted the important info in the description Tigrou :(Reading tournament discriptions isn't my strength :(This shit for cav?R E A DSpoileryes >:([close]
Steam (Captain): Gabriel (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Hawriil/)Its not my business, but arent you all from the 10ph?
Team Name: Gentlemenn's
Team Tag:Gentle*S
Players:
Gabriel - GUID
KillForSkill - GUID
FeezY - GUID
Atlatan - GUID
Zorius - GUID
Giovanni - GUID
Did you read and accept the rules?: Yes
My god, 5v5, dreams come true
arent you all from the 10ph?
- You roster can only consist of players part of the same regiment, up to 50% at max. Meaning if your team consists in 7 players, only three can be in the same regiment, no more.
@Hawriil
I don't know in which regiments your players are but just re-quoting this in case you missed it:Quote- You roster can only consist of players part of the same regiment, up to 50% at max. Meaning if your team consists in 7 players, only three can be in the same regiment, no more.
This is no typical 5v5 cavalry gf tournament, this aims at mixing-up teams and prepare players for the upcoming Fantasy League where every one will be put into a common pool and drafted by captains (so you won't get to play with your regimental mates necessarily). Sorry about the inconvenience if you guys all wanted to play together, I will try to host a more regular tournament later in the year.
@Hawriil
I don't know in which regiments your players are but just re-quoting this in case you missed it:Quote- You roster can only consist of players part of the same regiment, up to 50% at max. Meaning if your team consists in 7 players, only three can be in the same regiment, no more.
This is no typical 5v5 cavalry gf tournament, this aims at mixing-up teams and prepare players for the upcoming Fantasy League where every one will be put into a common pool and drafted by captains (so you won't get to play with your regimental mates necessarily). Sorry about the inconvenience if you guys all wanted to play together, I will try to host a more regular tournament later in the year.
Ah, ye, I see. It's strange, doing 5v5 like this. Many people (i think) can't play because has limits. If I play in regiment, and see event like it - I will form team with my friends, with regiment part. But currently rules succesfuly stoped me.
Steam (Captain): Treiz (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Treizz/)
Team Name: TBA
Team Tag: TBA
Players: Treiz - 484509 | DeLaBedoyère - 1229933 | Soartex - 782105 | Remao - 782240 | MaxenceIV - 388607 | Harbinger - 1346711 |
Did you read and accept the rules? Yes
Good luck Tardet & Mr. Facebook!
Steam (Captain): 4e | Dokletian (https://steamcommunity.com/id/dokiiiiiiiii/)
Team Name: tba.
Team Tag: tba.
Players: Dokletian - 781931 | DE14HANNES - 1217624 | Ciiges - 781925 | Carlos - 292892 | Stannis - 837568 | Andros - 1364268 | Aless - 811638
Did you read and accept the rules? Yes!
is it 3 bayonets or 2 + 1 sword?You've been a good co-host Fwuffy. I will NOT miss you.
is it 3 bayonets or 2 + 1 sword?ProudBoys will signup dw, will message you the details later
- Hussar is the only class allowed.
- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord
- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord
Because if they were allowed to play it'd take more than 4 years and we don't have that kind of time. Also lowers the amount of toxicity a very small bit since heavies are prime targets for- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord
Thought it’s inf one saw the date and was like “wtf Tardet is doing” but then realized I’m as stupid as TigereJokes aside, I can't blame you guys. The first edition was an infantry tournament, there is no indication in the title about it being for cavalry so some people are bound to draw fast conclusions.
Good luck
- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord
Spoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close]
I think that is because most likely every regiment in the fantasy league will be hussars. It's simply the most popular class. And sticking to one class makes the tournament more fair as everyone have the same conditions.
Think about the time aswell. Its hosted on one night.
Spoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close]
I mean all guys are having now the same cards to play with, not bad imo
Also lowers the amount of toxicity a very small bit since heavies are prime targets forSpoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close](fully deserved)abuse and insults.
As far as I discussed it with Skittles (can't be 100% certain since nothing has been announced yet) the Fantasy League will be Hussars only, as it's easier to rate players (give them a prize in that case) based on one class rather than on two.
As this tournament's main goal is to serve as a seeding base for the Fantasy League, it makes sense to use the rules which are likely to be put in place once the event arises, to guarantee fairness and equal conditions to every participant.
I'm not gonna hide it though, except if I am to host a big league like the CL, I probably won't allow more than one class in the competitions I organize. I would be genuinely interested in hosting a cuirassier only tournament in future though, assuming there is an obvious interest for it. I just don't fix the two mix well together, and although I respect people thinking differently, at the end of the day the tournaments I host represent my competitive views, not those of the entire cavalry community.
I fully understand that it's no satisfactory answer from your perspective but I'd rather be fully transparent about my intentions. I was very clear about it not so long ago (https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=44666.msg1981662#msg1981662). I don't mind having other people hosting tournaments including heavies though, neither do I mind partaking in them, I simply don't have any interest in being the one who hosts them as it's not the vision of competition I share.
I think we'll be fine and if you think I'm wrong, then you clearly have not paid enough attention to what most people experience when they face heavies (be it in 5v5, regimental leagues, etc..). As for every thing, time will tell. Good luck in your Bannelord endeavours, let us know when the game is no longer utter garbage, I'm sure a lot of us would be willing to enjoy it with you.
Spoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close]
It's not anything directly indicated against heavy players. But it was simply put in place to create a level-playing field for everyone. I feel it would create less drama overall. I am sorry if you think this is aimed at anyone directly, it really isn't!
Just to add on to what Tardet has said, ""I would be genuinely interested in hosting a cuirassier only tournament in future though, assuming there is an obvious interest for it". I also spoke with him not too long ago and we were saying we would be interested in doing something like this!
Retournes sur Bannerlord monstre.
Spoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close]
I think that is because most likely every regiment in the fantasy league will be hussars. It's simply the most popular class. And sticking to one class makes the tournament more fair as everyone have the same conditions.
I understand you point of view Lindbom and It is true that there are no really competitive cuirassiers regiments left compared to the overwhelming majority of hussar regiments. Nevertheless, it seems to me that what differentiates the very good player from the good player is his ability to adapt to his opponents. I think that there are still undefeated teams of cuirassiers and that some players dream of being able to face them again and finally defeat them after a lot of effort. Instead of forgetting HeavyCav teams under the pretext that they don't play in the same class, I propose to confront them. They are few in number but still presentThink about the time aswell. Its hosted on one night.
ah indeed, it's true that the matches between hussars and cuirassiers are long and maybe a time limit could have limited this problem? and then the matches in 5vs5 are not as long as the big matches between two big regiments of more than twenty players. Let's be honest, I don't remember, as far as I can remember, a match that was rather short in 5vs5 formatSpoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close]
I mean all guys are having now the same cards to play with, not bad imo
but that was the case before. Playing with its advantages to the point of abusing them to win.Different advantages, of course, but as in E-sport games like LOL for example, a hero/class can dominate at one moment and be dominated at another. It all depends on how you use your advantages and many other factorsAlso lowers the amount of toxicity a very small bit since heavies are prime targets forSpoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close](fully deserved)abuse and insults.
It is true that some members of the hussar community (a minority, not all) are extremely toxic towards the cuirassier community, even going so far as to create unnecessary drama against them. I would say (at face value) that 5% of these players are the source of more than 95% of the insults in this regard. Maybe, if we want to fight against toxicity, fight against this type of players rather than the class in question :)As far as I discussed it with Skittles (can't be 100% certain since nothing has been announced yet) the Fantasy League will be Hussars only, as it's easier to rate players (give them a prize in that case) based on one class rather than on two.
As this tournament's main goal is to serve as a seeding base for the Fantasy League, it makes sense to use the rules which are likely to be put in place once the event arises, to guarantee fairness and equal conditions to every participant.
I'm not gonna hide it though, except if I am to host a big league like the CL, I probably won't allow more than one class in the competitions I organize. I would be genuinely interested in hosting a cuirassier only tournament in future though, assuming there is an obvious interest for it. I just don't fix the two mix well together, and although I respect people thinking differently, at the end of the day the tournaments I host represent my competitive views, not those of the entire cavalry community.
All right, I can understand the idea of wanting to rank the Hussar players among themselves, which I think is important. But isn't a very good hussar able to adapt? Can't he manage to change his game against another kind of adversity? Isn't that what differentiates a very good player from a good player? A good regiment from a very good regiment which can adapt his own tactic?
Moreover, about the league, why not allow in the future fantasy league the cuirassiers players to play their class as Thyrell had very cleverly organised for his tournament? The style of one cuirassier for five hussars on the field
As far as a cuirassier league is concerned, this is frankly impossible due to the fact that there are no more or not enough solid cuirassier regiments. I think you are already informed on this point but it is a hope that I tried to apply 3 years ago when there were big cuirassier regiments and it didn't work. Now if it's to allow hussar players to play cuirassier, I don't see any point in making a league of cuirassiers but this will not be taken seriously by the playersI fully understand that it's no satisfactory answer from your perspective but I'd rather be fully transparent about my intentions. I was very clear about it not so long ago (https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=44666.msg1981662#msg1981662). I don't mind having other people hosting tournaments including heavies though, neither do I mind partaking in them, I simply don't have any interest in being the one who hosts them as it's not the vision of competition I share.
the fact that you acknowledge it honours you and I am grateful for this honesty. This is your tournament and it is legitimate for you to organise it as you see fit. I really would have liked to take part in it. It's a pity that with the absence of cuirassiers, you are finally taking away my weapon on which I have always played and that takes away all my initial interest that I had in the tournament
I think we'll be fine and if you think I'm wrong, then you clearly have not paid enough attention to what most people experience when they face heavies (be it in 5v5, regimental leagues, etc..). As for every thing, time will tell. Good luck in your Bannelord endeavours, let us know when the game is no longer utter garbage, I'm sure a lot of us would be willing to enjoy it with you.
I think you're wrong and we don't agree on this point. When I look at the other side of the community, I realise that we have always had a lot of diversity. That many people enjoy diversifying their style of play. Indeed, many have complained about cuirassiers. But again, they speak much more than those who have always and will continue to see cavalry matches not as tournaments just between hussars but also between hussars and cuirassiers. Indeed, there are probably more people who think that there should be only one class: hussars and this is a great regret for me.
For BannerLord, I propose that we look at the number of simultaneous connections on both games. 3,000 on Warband versus 15,000 on BannerLord. The revolution is here and time will prove me right: when Taleword closes the servers on Warband, you'll have to face the facts
Honestly, on this spade, I want to add that the game has really improved and the rider duels on this game are just so much better than on Warband. Honestly, this game is great:and it will continue to improve thanks to the active game community that is working with the developers to provide a better experience for playersSpoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close]
It's not anything directly indicated against heavy players. But it was simply put in place to create a level-playing field for everyone. I feel it would create less drama overall. I am sorry if you think this is aimed at anyone directly, it really isn't!
Just to add on to what Tardet has said, ""I would be genuinely interested in hosting a cuirassier only tournament in future though, assuming there is an obvious interest for it". I also spoke with him not too long ago and we were saying we would be interested in doing something like this!
I totally understand the idea of making hussars cup but let's face it, making a heavy cup is completely impossible. This is the biggest tragedy: the cuirassiers regiments (14pk, 1erRC, DCL) all disbanded after winning all the tournaments in any format. We have always been a minority against a majority of hussars.It is true that there are no really competitive cuirassiers regiments left compared to the overwhelming majority of hussar regiments. It is also true that regiments of lancers and then cuirassiers were not much help.But like the lancers in the past, don't expect the cuirassiers to play a different class. I mean, this may have been the case for the SNC because it was a national issue, but I clearly doubt that cuirassiers will not play as hussars. once again, those who make dramas about cuirassiers are still few in number, but they are the authors of the great majority of the dramas and God knows they were numerous. By the way, there is still the 8pk and the regiments of hussars who will want to play cuirassiers, in short little interest. Not against, teams of cuirassiers are still existing and only ask to have the possibility to play to participate. Also for some players, don't hesitate to let me play cuirassier in the Draft Cup and I will be present on the front line on the battlefield
SpoilerSpoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close]
I think that is because most likely every regiment in the fantasy league will be hussars. It's simply the most popular class. And sticking to one class makes the tournament more fair as everyone have the same conditions.
I understand you point of view Lindbom and It is true that there are no really competitive cuirassiers regiments left compared to the overwhelming majority of hussar regiments. Nevertheless, it seems to me that what differentiates the very good player from the good player is his ability to adapt to his opponents. I think that there are still undefeated teams of cuirassiers and that some players dream of being able to face them again and finally defeat them after a lot of effort. Instead of forgetting HeavyCav teams under the pretext that they don't play in the same class, I propose to confront them. They are few in number but still presentThink about the time aswell. Its hosted on one night.
ah indeed, it's true that the matches between hussars and cuirassiers are long and maybe a time limit could have limited this problem? and then the matches in 5vs5 are not as long as the big matches between two big regiments of more than twenty players. Let's be honest, I don't remember, as far as I can remember, a match that was rather short in 5vs5 formatSpoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close]
I mean all guys are having now the same cards to play with, not bad imo
but that was the case before. Playing with its advantages to the point of abusing them to win.Different advantages, of course, but as in E-sport games like LOL for example, a hero/class can dominate at one moment and be dominated at another. It all depends on how you use your advantages and many other factorsAlso lowers the amount of toxicity a very small bit since heavies are prime targets forSpoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close](fully deserved)abuse and insults.
It is true that some members of the hussar community (a minority, not all) are extremely toxic towards the cuirassier community, even going so far as to create unnecessary drama against them. I would say (at face value) that 5% of these players are the source of more than 95% of the insults in this regard. Maybe, if we want to fight against toxicity, fight against this type of players rather than the class in question :)As far as I discussed it with Skittles (can't be 100% certain since nothing has been announced yet) the Fantasy League will be Hussars only, as it's easier to rate players (give them a prize in that case) based on one class rather than on two.
As this tournament's main goal is to serve as a seeding base for the Fantasy League, it makes sense to use the rules which are likely to be put in place once the event arises, to guarantee fairness and equal conditions to every participant.
I'm not gonna hide it though, except if I am to host a big league like the CL, I probably won't allow more than one class in the competitions I organize. I would be genuinely interested in hosting a cuirassier only tournament in future though, assuming there is an obvious interest for it. I just don't fix the two mix well together, and although I respect people thinking differently, at the end of the day the tournaments I host represent my competitive views, not those of the entire cavalry community.
All right, I can understand the idea of wanting to rank the Hussar players among themselves, which I think is important. But isn't a very good hussar able to adapt? Can't he manage to change his game against another kind of adversity? Isn't that what differentiates a very good player from a good player? A good regiment from a very good regiment which can adapt his own tactic?
Moreover, about the league, why not allow in the future fantasy league the cuirassiers players to play their class as Thyrell had very cleverly organised for his tournament? The style of one cuirassier for five hussars on the field
As far as a cuirassier league is concerned, this is frankly impossible due to the fact that there are no more or not enough solid cuirassier regiments. I think you are already informed on this point but it is a hope that I tried to apply 3 years ago when there were big cuirassier regiments and it didn't work. Now if it's to allow hussar players to play cuirassier, I don't see any point in making a league of cuirassiers but this will not be taken seriously by the playersI fully understand that it's no satisfactory answer from your perspective but I'd rather be fully transparent about my intentions. I was very clear about it not so long ago (https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=44666.msg1981662#msg1981662). I don't mind having other people hosting tournaments including heavies though, neither do I mind partaking in them, I simply don't have any interest in being the one who hosts them as it's not the vision of competition I share.
the fact that you acknowledge it honours you and I am grateful for this honesty. This is your tournament and it is legitimate for you to organise it as you see fit. I really would have liked to take part in it. It's a pity that with the absence of cuirassiers, you are finally taking away my weapon on which I have always played and that takes away all my initial interest that I had in the tournament
I think we'll be fine and if you think I'm wrong, then you clearly have not paid enough attention to what most people experience when they face heavies (be it in 5v5, regimental leagues, etc..). As for every thing, time will tell. Good luck in your Bannelord endeavours, let us know when the game is no longer utter garbage, I'm sure a lot of us would be willing to enjoy it with you.
I think you're wrong and we don't agree on this point. When I look at the other side of the community, I realise that we have always had a lot of diversity. That many people enjoy diversifying their style of play. Indeed, many have complained about cuirassiers. But again, they speak much more than those who have always and will continue to see cavalry matches not as tournaments just between hussars but also between hussars and cuirassiers. Indeed, there are probably more people who think that there should be only one class: hussars and this is a great regret for me.
For BannerLord, I propose that we look at the number of simultaneous connections on both games. 3,000 on Warband versus 15,000 on BannerLord. The revolution is here and time will prove me right: when Taleword closes the servers on Warband, you'll have to face the facts
Honestly, on this spade, I want to add that the game has really improved and the rider duels on this game are just so much better than on Warband. Honestly, this game is great:and it will continue to improve thanks to the active game community that is working with the developers to provide a better experience for playersSpoiler- Hussar is the only class allowed.
so I'm going to ask the drama question: "why?"
It's just surprising then that the cuirassiers teams won the last editions in 5vs5 format to put them aside like this. So very experienced players in this class will not be able to play it. Very unfortunate
If the idea is simply to play with just one class, then I suppose the community will shrink even further for what's left of it
Good luck for the rest of your tournament. I sincerely wish you a very good tournament while I'm going back to BannerLord[close]
It's not anything directly indicated against heavy players. But it was simply put in place to create a level-playing field for everyone. I feel it would create less drama overall. I am sorry if you think this is aimed at anyone directly, it really isn't!
Just to add on to what Tardet has said, ""I would be genuinely interested in hosting a cuirassier only tournament in future though, assuming there is an obvious interest for it". I also spoke with him not too long ago and we were saying we would be interested in doing something like this!
I totally understand the idea of making hussars cup but let's face it, making a heavy cup is completely impossible. This is the biggest tragedy: the cuirassiers regiments (14pk, 1erRC, DCL) all disbanded after winning all the tournaments in any format. We have always been a minority against a majority of hussars.It is true that there are no really competitive cuirassiers regiments left compared to the overwhelming majority of hussar regiments. It is also true that regiments of lancers and then cuirassiers were not much help.But like the lancers in the past, don't expect the cuirassiers to play a different class. I mean, this may have been the case for the SNC because it was a national issue, but I clearly doubt that cuirassiers will not play as hussars. once again, those who make dramas about cuirassiers are still few in number, but they are the authors of the great majority of the dramas and God knows they were numerous. By the way, there is still the 8pk and the regiments of hussars who will want to play cuirassiers, in short little interest. Not against, teams of cuirassiers are still existing and only ask to have the possibility to play to participate. Also for some players, don't hesitate to let me play cuirassier in the Draft Cup and I will be present on the front line on the battlefield[close]
I would like to say, your English has improved dramatically as of late. Very well done to you, and there are some valid points throughout what you have said for both. But again i'll always revert back to the equal playing field as my main point of keeping the same classes.
the revolution is here and time will prove me right
Why does it have to be all on one evening? And how long is it expected to last (how many hours)?
I am not gonna repeat things I just said in the post above, I'm happy enough you got the chance to formulate a proper response (which if anything, shows how much your English has been improving in so little time) but I will leave it personally at that. No point explaining I disagree with some of your points just for the sake it as it won't bring anything valuable to the discussion.
Just for the record, however, when I was talking about a heavy competition, I was more thinking about a one-night tournament with teams (just like this one) rather than something last over weeks/months with regiments, for the exact reasons you mentioned. I remember that when we played to train vs you & the CI during the CL, we had internal battles in the 4e where half of us would go as heavies. On the heavy side these fights proved enjoyable/amusing for the little time we did them and that's why I assume some hussars wouldn't mind making for a change and play competition as heavies versus other heavies from time to time. I at least know I would.
Because groupfighting tournaments have traditionally always been on one evening (thinking about PrideofNi's tournaments for instance). The 5v5 hosted by the 2Lr was an exception in that regards (as far as I know at least) and although perfectly run, it asked a lot more commitment from teams & admins.
So again the question, how many hours is it supposed to last? I personally have neither the time nor the motivation to play three, four or even more hours at once.How is he supposed to know how long it will take? That depends on how long the respective rounds last. Since the first matches are only Ft3, you can assume that they will not last longer than 10-15 minutes.
I can only remember the 5vs5 Tournament of DragonKing early this year which was played weekly and in my opinion a lot of fun. I only played one Tournament which was played on one evening and it felt exhausting. The funny thing is that the most interesting Matches had the weakest effort because of the time. I understand that it is usual in this Community to host such Events but i still don't understand why.
So again the question, how many hours is it supposed to last? I personally have neither the time nor the motivation to play three, four or even more hours at once.
Huehue Thyrell and myself created that idea in the last Fantasy League which said that 5 hussars and 1 cuirassier is needed on your roster and ingame
Hussars: Try to play a fun, friendly, fast paced tournament
Cuirassiers:Spoiler(https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/37e/828/1e2a2943b3871f23576937330a0fbdd9f6-squidward.rsquare.w700.jpg)[close]
Edit: not really in the cav comunity, 5vs5 tournaments have traditionally lasted for several weeks. you have this one (https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=43189.0), but also the 5vs5 league of the Nr4&2lr. in fact, over 3 years, the 5vs5 always lasted several weeks. It changed with the 3v3 format, duel format and your tournament aswell
I can only remember the 5vs5 Tournament of DragonKing early this year which was played weekly and in my opinion a lot of fun. I only played one Tournament which was played on one evening and it felt exhausting. The funny thing is that the most interesting Matches had the weakest effort because of the time. I understand that it is usual in this Community to host such Events but i still don't understand why.
So again the question, how many hours is it supposed to last? I personally have neither the time nor the motivation to play three, four or even more hours at once.
Only thing I can say to this is that when I hosted my Duel Tournament last year, everyone was trying to explain how the whole thing couldn't be done on one evening - turned out that it worked perfectly fine.
Tournaments that last several weeks get boring really fast and in the end nobody really cares about them anymore.
Edit: not really in the cav comunity, 5vs5 tournaments have traditionally lasted for several weeks. you have this one (https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=43189.0), but also the 5vs5 league of the Nr4&2lr. in fact, over 3 years, the 5vs5 always lasted several weeks. It changed with the 3v3 format, duel format and your tournament aswell
I am playing since 2012 so when I say traditionally it means 'since cavalry tournament existed'. Here are examples of tournaments that happened from 2013 to 2014, that were 5v5s and lasted over one night:
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=2494.0
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=6132.0
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=8185.0
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=9692.0
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=11247.0
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=12158.0
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=23528.0
I have looked over a bit and it does appear indeed that 5v5 has become the trend in the late years of NW (with very of them hosted from 2015 to 2017) so it wasn't only the 2Lr/Nr4's one but traditionally speaking, they have been on one night.
This should be finished in less than 3 hours for 99% of the teams. Depending on if you plan on making it far, you can count on a good 2h or 2,30h, but hardly more. And just like I mentioned, if we happen to be late, there is always the possibility of calling it off for the night and resume the following day or the day after for the teams still in the tournament (that's why we planned it on a Friday, to have more flexibility if such an issue arise).
The rule is god like. Im rly happy like many other players, now its just about skill and not the class or the tiny map. DK you dont have to talk about LOL on this thread, this is completly different. There is no other way to make this 100% fair to all players. I mean i dont play against heavy teams. If this rule werent there, i would simply not come to these matches.
The rule is god like. Im rly happy like many other players, now its just about skill and not the class or the tiny map. DK you dont have to talk about LOL on this thread, this is completly different. There is no other way to make this 100% fair to all players. I mean i dont play against heavy teams. If this rule werent there, i would simply not come to these matches.
Once again (and sorry Tardet if I pollute your thread), I suggest you read what I wrote again. I used LOL but I could have talked about any other competitive game like OverWatch for example. The fact is whether you come or not you would lose because you can't adapt to cuirassiers gameplay. You are a really good player when it comes to hussars but only good against cuirassiers. and I don't want to offend you by saying this, I'm just giving the facts and my feelings (because, I am convinced that you would destroy me 10-0 if I made a hussar duel against you)
You are welcome! To give you a clearer idea of the tournament's format it should be:This should be finished in less than 3 hours for 99% of the teams. Depending on if you plan on making it far, you can count on a good 2h or 2,30h, but hardly more. And just like I mentioned, if we happen to be late, there is always the possibility of calling it off for the night and resume the following day or the day after for the teams still in the tournament (that's why we planned it on a Friday, to have more flexibility if such an issue arise).
Thank you, now that is something to work with :D ;)
Personally, I agree with Dokletian on this point, a quick tournament is better than one that lasts a whole month because the hype disappears expect for the favorits team. Still, the tournament should not last too long on one day to keep the spirit and concentration fresh. Besides, if everyone could participate with their own weapon, it would be even better
it is also true, and octanidas does well to point it out, that many players will not be able to stay a whole night especially if they work the next day
The rule is god like. Im rly happy like many other players, now its just about skill and not the class or the tiny map. DK you dont have to talk about LOL on this thread, this is completly different. There is no other way to make this 100% fair to all players. I mean i dont play against heavy teams. If this rule werent there, i would simply not come to these matches.
Once again (and sorry Tardet if I pollute your thread), I suggest you read what I wrote again. I used LOL but I could have talked about any other competitive game like OverWatch for example. The fact is whether you come or not you would lose because you can't adapt to cuirassiers gameplay. You are a really good player when it comes to hussars but only good against cuirassiers. and I don't want to offend you by saying this, I'm just giving the facts and my feelings (because, I am convinced that you would destroy me 10-0 if I made a hussar duel against you)
ye thats true, im not that good against heavys because i need the factor fun for playing good. I wouldnt rly care if i would get a lost to this, i didnt showed up Ger vs Pol because of that. if there is no fun in it, then its just feels like work.
You do understand DK that there is literally nothing preventing you from hosting a 5v5 tournament with heavies, on any given weekend. Feels like it would be a better time invested than endlessly arguing on this thread about something which is not going to change, no matter how 'saddening' it is.
Just because one tournament forbid all classes but one doesn't mean it has to become the norm in every other tournament. A the end of the day, you are the maker of your own destiny, and I'm convinced a 5v5 tournament with heavies and hussars both included would meet an equal (if not bigger) success as this one.
I also wonder why is DK leaving Warband?
You do understand DK that there is literally nothing preventing you from hosting a 5v5 tournament with heavies, on any given weekend. Feels like it would be a better time invested than endlessly arguing on this thread about something which is not going to change, no matter how 'saddening' it is.
Just because one tournament forbid all classes but one doesn't mean it has to become the norm in every other tournament. A the end of the day, you are the maker of your own destiny, and I'm convinced a 5v5 tournament with heavies and hussars both included would meet an equal (if not bigger) success as this one.
As a Cuirassier I don' feel offended in any way and I wish you good luck in hosting such an interesting tournament.
Great job Tardet and Skittles, It would be a pleasure to take part in this event.
I also wonder why is it taking so long for DK to finally leave Warband. I'm look forward to the day when I wake up and not have to look at the this insolent lady.
I couldn't wait to be asked! Very simply for 3 things:
1) the next tournaments ban cuirassiers teams which discourages me. I will be able to set up tournaments but it takes too much time and increases the stress.
2) I feel like I've earned everything I had to earn (1v1, 3v3, 5vs5, Nations cup, LB championship). and I've spent so many evenings playing more than 3 hours against toxic teams that I say stop. As DE14HANNES said, when we play we need to have fun. I saw, I came, I won and now they don't want me anymore so I'm going to the future :) Nevertheless, I like the game and come back for an evening to have a little fun and distraction, I say yes
3) I am very tired of always hearing players complaining about the cuirassiers. A lot of people who hate me for not too many reasons, often simply because I'm a cuirassier and because I argue in favour of my class. It has become a generality. After the lancers, it's the cuirassiers' turn to be ejected. and it disgusts me. I chose the cavalry for its diversity and this is what it becomes :) but this is the fate of any community, you will tell me and I will answer: maybe
As a Cuirassier I don' feel offended in any way and I wish you good luck in hosting such an interesting tournament.
Great job Tardet and Skittles, It would be a pleasure to take part in this event.
I also wonder why is it taking so long for DK to finally leave Warband. I'm look forward to the day when I wake up and not have to look at the this insolent lady.
I couldn't wait to be asked! Very simply for 3 things:
1) the next tournaments ban cuirassiers teams which discourages me. I will be able to set up tournaments but it takes too much time and increases the stress.
2) I feel like I've earned everything I had to earn (1v1, 3v3, 5vs5, Nations cup, LB championship). and I've spent so many evenings playing more than 3 hours against toxic teams that I say stop. As DE14HANNES said, when we play we need to have fun. I saw, I came, I won and now they don't want me anymore so I'm going to the future :) Nevertheless, I like the game and come back for an evening to have a little fun and distraction, I say yes
3) I am very tired of always hearing players complaining about the cuirassiers. A lot of people who hate me for not too many reasons, often simply because I'm a cuirassier and because I argue in favour of my class. It has become a generality. After the lancers, it's the cuirassiers' turn to be ejected. and it disgusts me. I chose the cavalry for its diversity and this is what it becomes :) but this is the fate of any community, you will tell me and I will answer: maybe
(https://media.giphy.com/media/l0Iun3JN3FxgL84XS/giphy.gif)
fuck erik
fuck erik
fuck erik
fuck treiz
fuck erik
Btw after many years of being savage heavy I finally decided to become hussar.
Does anyone love me right now? :'(
fuck Erik
Btw after many years of being savage heavy I finally decided to become hussar.Sadly it wasn't the heavy part that made people dislike you. It's the fact that you're Polish.
Does anyone love me right now? :'(
fuck Erik
fuck erik.
Btw after many years of being savage heavy I finally decided to become hussar.Sadly it wasn't the heavy part that made people dislike you. It's the fact that you're Polish.
Does anyone love me right now? :'(
fuck Erik
My most sincere condolences.
fuck Erik
Less talking, more cleaning.Btw after many years of being savage heavy I finally decided to become hussar.Sadly it wasn't the heavy part that made people dislike you. It's the fact that you're Polish.
Does anyone love me right now? :'(
fuck Erik
My most sincere condolences.
Get back to your dark lair, you cave troll.
Fuck Waffle.
Tardet more like drama kingI am just doing it for the views.
Already subscribedTardet more like drama kingI am just doing it for the views.
fuck erik
(https://i.imgur.com/ubuOWns.png) Quinn (https://steamcommunity.com/id/quinn26) [C] | 8036 |
(https://i.imgur.com/eAnucNe.png) Atsuque (https://steamcommunity.com/id/ats2) | 451768 |
(https://i.imgur.com/ubuOWns.png) Thorny (https://steamcommunity.com/id/ThornyTheThorn) | 474460 |
(https://i.imgur.com/PBp92Gz.png) Redbull (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198196806259) | 991149 |
(https://i.imgur.com/7xbyuO3.png) Peaky (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198035771597) | 1479107 |
(https://i.imgur.com/PBp92Gz.png) Jetfire (https://steamcommunity.com/id/RealJetfireBlack) | 1593435 |
(https://i.imgur.com/PBp92Gz.png) Kreativer (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198346186564) | 1747114 |
Steam (Captain): LaSalle
Team Name: HOMOSEXUALS
Team Tag: HOMO*S
Players:
LaSalle - 76561197993986619
Leensab - STEAM_0:1:174528633
Draco - 76561198272825284
Domi - 76561198417103752
TBA - GUID
TBA - GUID
TBA - GUID
Did you read and accept the rules?: Yes
For BannerLord, I propose that we look at the number of simultaneous connections on both games. 3,000 on Warband versus 15,000 on BannerLord. The revolution is here and time will prove me right: when Taleword closes the servers on Warband, you'll have to face the facts
Honestly, on this spade, I want to add that the game has really improved and the rider duels on this game are just so much better than on Warband. Honestly, this game is great:and it will continue to improve thanks to the active game community that is working with the developers to provide a better experience for players
Steam (Captain): LaSalle
Team Name: HOMOSEXUALS
Team Tag: HOMO*S
Players:
LaSalle - 76561197993986619
Leensab - STEAM_0:1:174528633
Draco - 76561198272825284
Domi - 76561198417103752
TBA - GUID
TBA - GUID
TBA - GUID
Did you read and accept the rules?: Yes
How I can lead this ...
lancers best unit
SpoilerFor BannerLord, I propose that we look at the number of simultaneous connections on both games. 3,000 on Warband versus 15,000 on BannerLord. The revolution is here and time will prove me right: when Taleword closes the servers on Warband, you'll have to face the facts
Honestly, on this spade, I want to add that the game has really improved and the rider duels on this game are just so much better than on Warband. Honestly, this game is great:and it will continue to improve thanks to the active game community that is working with the developers to provide a better experience for players[close]
I am going to engage with this solely to give some actual data, some of which is directly from TW, to demonstrate not only that Warband has a higher percentage of MP players per population than Bannerlord, but that it actually has a higher total of MP players than it as well.
First, you give Warband 3,000. At this very moment Warband has 6,671 players (https://i.gyazo.com/40fd4de4770d47d84dfed3ecc0b0afd9.png), more than double your insanely low estimate.
Second, you are accurate that Bannerlord has ~15,000, as at this moment it has 15,891 (https://i.gyazo.com/224166ff266cbb166e0b90385df90cf9.png).
Your insane bias and misrepresentation aside, these raw figures prove nothing in the way of total MP population for several reasons. Perhaps most importantly, many Warband players use a non-steam version, so the actual number is higher than Steam shows. On Native alone, right now, there are 610 players (https://i.gyazo.com/cfe9ca8bd6a651f587da7a82278c1c6b.png) in MP and two of the top servers, which cannot be counted in the aggregate as they are from other modules (nice browser TW), have ~100 players (https://i.gyazo.com/9d3bf99f6c6b21f77a61d3c62efa7162.jpg). I can see several others on the list with 20-50, so I'm going to be conservative and say that we add those two 100 servers to the 610, plus 4 more with 50, and we get to 1000 players in MP.
Warband has 6,671 players in total and ~1000 in MP. That's exactly 15% of the total population.
For Bannerlord things are a little more complicated because we do not have numbers for the matchmaking, only the barren server browser which gives us a total of 176 players (https://i.gyazo.com/3f56a36767d664116ae31591f7f346c5.png). As said, we can only speculate on the numbers in matchmaking, but I think if we are being generous we can theorise there are at least the same number in matchmaking as in the server browser, so if we multiply our 176 by two, we get 352 players.
However, don't think that I am only using speculation, as we do have cold hard numbers which Callum (TW Community Manager) gave to me upon release of Early Access, which was 6,000 in MP out of a 250,000 total. This is a MASSIVE 2.4% of the total population, six times lower than what Warband has.
Now, obviously the 250,000 Bannerlord had on release did not last, as we can see it has been reduced to 6% of the number with a mere 15,000, so we cannot use the 6,000 MP figure either. However, what we can use is the 2.4% figure which we got from using the figures provided by TaleWorlds. If we apply this to the 15,000 total players in Bannerlord we get 360 players, little more than 1/3 of the total players in Warband's MP.If there were only 300 players, I think we could talk about a real disaster, but as I said before, it's not the case. The number of players on BannerLord is very high. on the skirmish mod alone and in a European-only competition with only one game mode, we reach a approximatly more than 500 active players. i doubt that even on the Napoleonic Wars community (I can't talk about the native) reaches such a number.
So, for Bannerlord's MP, using my speculation we reach 352 players and using the data from TaleWorlds we get 360 players. With this in mind, I think it's fair to say that Bannerlord sits comfortably between 350 and 400 players in its MP.
So, here are the actual accurate final numbers for you DragonKing.
Warband total: 6,671
Warband MP: ~1000
Warband MP as a percentage of whole: 15%
Bannerlord total: 15,891
Bannerlord MP: 350-400
Bannerlord MP as a percentage of whole: 2.35%
Categorically, you are wrong to claim that Bannerlord has a more popular MP than Warband.
I purposely kept that part of DK's bullshitery away in the former drama but I will add to what Gibby said that you can check the team rosters of the BEAST tournaments (which are now at their third edition) and you will see a pattern where almost none of the most active and arguably best players of the different competitive multiplayer modules throughout the last 6-7 years (NW, Native & even Mercenaries) can be spotted. Some went back to inactivity, some stayed on WB but only a slim percentage (below 1% I'd argue) actually kept hopes when it comes to BL multiplayer (in a competitive aspect).
That doesn't mean that BL doesn't have a competitive scene, but clearly, by delivering a clumsy and completely unfinished product, failing to listen to the people who actually knew what they were talking about (Gibby here can tell you a lot about it) and generally failing at understanding why their game had such a lasting highly competitive community throughout all these years, TW killed any potential for a strong, active and highly competitive multiplayer scene on BL.
That's not the point of the thread but let it be a lesson for people who actually don't mind straight-up lying to you to fuel their false narrative. You want to go play BL, tryhard and try to make the multiplayer scene at least as good as what warband was, go for it, nobody ain't stopping you. But trying to threaten players who still very much care about warband in telling them that they will be forced to play BL once TW close the servers is a disgusting approach that is bound to fail. If TW actually does that at some point, that won't make these players switch to BL.
Rant over, sorry about the off-topic.
Imagine there are 8 pages for a hussars tournament and 5 of them are about a class which is not part of the tournament or about another game.ImAgInE.
How does this relate to the tournament at all.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Hello, my gamer tag is Kore and my opinions are ALWAYS, 100% objectively correct.
My opinion on the Warband vs N E V E R L O R D topic is - you guessed it - Bannerlord is trash and devs are DUMB. Only SP is worth my time.
Kind regards
me
Who are you?Hello, my gamer tag is Kore and my opinions are ALWAYS, 100% objectively correct.
My opinion on the Warband vs N E V E R L O R D topic is - you guessed it - Bannerlord is trash and devs are DUMB. Only SP is worth my time.
Kind regards
me
who are you?
quality roast(https://i.imgur.com/q5e2iMp.png)
Sir I would prefer if this thread remained a beacon of Christianity and goodness so please refrain from using such vulgar insinuations.(https://i.imgur.com/q5e2iMp.png)
free agent
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Steinmannn/free agent
If you're a free agent make sure you put in on the thread with the correct application form please!
p.s love you Stein
free agenthaha
hahafree agenthaha
Who are these people?(https://i.imgur.com/0GOkTI5.png)
Who are these people?People you haven't bribed yet, hurry up.
Imagine talking shit to fred on a drinking night. The guy is already struggling enough to keep up with ricky.You
if you talk to fralla like that I swear to god I will use your dad as a urinal and he will thank me for itTry me I fear no one in here
if you talk to fralla like that I swear to god I will use your dad as a urinal and he will thank me for itIGOR is a mediocre album
K.O.if you talk to fralla like that I swear to god I will use your dad as a urinal and he will thank me for itIGOR is a mediocre album
Psssh, infantry people, back to your cage.O
if you talk to fralla like that I swear to god I will use your dad as a urinal and he will thank me for itTry me I fear no one in here
if you talk to fralla like that I swear to god I will use your dad as a urinal and he will thank me for itIGOR is a mediocre album
Psssh, infantry people, back to your cages.(https://media4.giphy.com/media/l0HU5bbgdW6qzJsmQ/giphy.gif)
That's it Fralla, I'm calling Fwuffy.Leave Fwuffy ALONE he has more shit to deal with than having YOU there
Steam (Captain): Amue
Team Name: Dickers
Team Tag: Dick
Players: Amue- TBA| Rikkert - TBA | Ricky - TBA | Gi - TBA | Fralla - TBA | Mike- TBA | Kore - TBA
Did you read and accept the rules? Yes
(https://i.imgur.com/q5e2iMp.png)
free agenthaha
Steam (Captain): 4e | Dokletian (https://steamcommunity.com/id/dokiiiiiiiii/)name added
Team Name: Cereal Killers
Team Tag: CK_Name
Players: Dokletian - 781931 | DE14HANNES - 1217624 | Ciiges - 781925 | Carlos - 292892 | Stannis - 837568 | Andros - 1364268 | Aless - 811638
Did you read and accept the rules? Yes!
when are 4e and 8th merging?I wish
Average Joes vs Purple Cobras final incoming
Average Joes vs Purple Cobras final incoming(https://cdn.betterttv.net/emote/5eaa12a074046462f768344b/3x)
Spoiler(https://i.ibb.co/tBMPhPQ/Opera-Snapshot-2020-12-31-151233-www-fsegames-eu.png)[close]Spoilerhttps://youtu.be/6G7HYqjBxgg[close]SpoilerBVH70 still with the cutest signup, fight me[close]
Steam (Captain): USE4life https://steamcommunity.com/id/USE4life/
Team Name: Jorvik Viking Centre
Team Tag: Jrvk Players:
USE4life
Bladeson
Nozza
TBA
TBA
Did you read and accept the rules? No
Erik on his way to cooltext.com to get some headers for his team application
(https://cdn.drawception.com/drawings/756240/JCjKYPygWS.png)
Steam (Captain): USE4life https://steamcommunity.com/id/USE4life/
Team Name: Jorvik Viking Centre
Team Tag: Jrvk Players:
USE4life
Bladeson
Nozza
Shagon
TBA
Did you read and accept the rules? Yes!
(https://i.imgur.com/DUsezZA.png?1)Don't fight it, embrace it.
(https://i.imgur.com/HAWL0PN.png)
#TeamJesu
Steam (Captain): https://steamcommunity.com/id/1832685WP01/
Team Name: JME
Team Tag: JME_
Players:
PONPON4
LEBRUN 1832685
Ozikan 1389381
Neena
Belgian Fury
Bouboune 519040
Did you read and accept the rules? Yes
OwO what's This?
Someone add me to your team, I'm only tier 3 but I have a good heart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSjcLmS9v7o
OwO what's This?
Someone add me to your team, I'm only tier 3 but I have a good heart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSjcLmS9v7o
We take RastiLightning out there doing God's work
The devils work ratherWe take RastiLightning out there doing God's work
OP has been updated with the teams' information.
The following teams: wookies^wb, Jesu's team, Muffins & Jorvik Viking Centre, have been added to the tournament's rosters but with their application still pending due to either an incomplete roster or the lack of GUIDS. Please make sure to update your roster before the deadline. You still got plenty of time but the sooner, the better.
(https://i.gyazo.com/812d94b3106dc29ed8e88b21f5de4173.png)He controls the keyboard, i control the mouse.
Rule breaking spotted
(https://i.gyazo.com/812d94b3106dc29ed8e88b21f5de4173.png)He controls the keyboard, i control the mouse.
Rule breaking spotted
This is okay i think?
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Quinn 8036
(https://i.gyazo.com/812d94b3106dc29ed8e88b21f5de4173.png)He controls the keyboard, i control the mouse.
Rule breaking spotted
This is okay i think?
Oh I thought one spot on screen and the other takes your controller :o
Steam (Captain): Jesu (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198387539734)Updated
Team Name: Monkeys without sticks
Team Tag: Monkey
Players: Jesu - 1663937 | Termito - 1346711 | Darklight - 509154 | Dume - 1631822 | Aitor - 1156041 | Lorucas - 1379001 | Scarta - 1416808
Did you read and accept the rules? Yes
Team Name: Monkeys without stickshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21DDcUSdteI
(https://i.gyazo.com/812d94b3106dc29ed8e88b21f5de4173.png)
Rule breaking spotted
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SmylieNWbest cav newcomer of 2021
Nickname: Smylie
GUID: 1467774
Nationality: Irish
Past teams (If any): Inf stuff but played in dragon kings 5v5.
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SmylieNWbest cav newcomer of 2021
Nickname: Smylie
GUID: 1467774
Nationality: Irish
Past teams (If any): Inf stuff but played in dragon kings 5v5.
you read it here first
Past teams (If any): Inf stuff but played in dragon kings 5v5.
Ye I was just I didn’t say the name coz I would’ve been surprised if people knew the name haha and ye don’t forget barro, nightwing, dren, ilypa or any of the other inf noobs in the team :)Past teams (If any): Inf stuff but played in dragon kings 5v5.
wait you were in Kamikaze Hussars with Cr3a and me!!!!
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SmylieNWLiar
Nickname: Smylie
GUID: 1467774
Nationality: Irish
Past teams (If any): Inf stuff but played in dragon kings 5v5.
(https://i.gyazo.com/2bb6761ebea9b01e3ac25c7035a76641.png)Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SmylieNWLiar
Nickname: Smylie
GUID: 1467774
Nationality: Irish
Past teams (If any): Inf stuff but played in dragon kings 5v5.
yes among your fellow "Irishmen" *SPIT*(https://i.gyazo.com/2bb6761ebea9b01e3ac25c7035a76641.png)Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SmylieNWLiar
Nickname: Smylie
GUID: 1467774
Nationality: Irish
Past teams (If any): Inf stuff but played in dragon kings 5v5.
Hmmm my belgian friend
Idk if this will make us the 13th team, but here is the signup
Steam (Captain): Apollo https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198086107639/
Team Name: Muffins (actually it is TBA)
Team Tag: TBA
Players: Apollo - 817802 | Parigoniculus - 801349 | Grozni - 510578 | Ilypa - 1704636 | Ironfist - 1471725 | Smylie - 1467774 | TBA
Did you read and accept the rules? Yes
Team Name: Animals
Team Tag: Animals name_Name
Team Captain(s): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Coco_AyalaNW/
Roster:
Coco_Ayala 1462072
Lightning 463907
Felix 1152541
Ouranos 665180
Bocom 1100085
Stefan 1607471
Michnicki 1221210
change the ground color.. im not racist but too many blacky blacky :P
Steam (Captain): USE4life https://steamcommunity.com/id/USE4life/
Team Name: Jorvik Viking Centre
Team Tag: Jrvk
Players:
USE4life 62810
Bladeson 63203
Nozza 60535
Shagon 492854
Bluck 1478606
Did you read and accept the rules? Yes!
Steam (Captain): USE4life https://steamcommunity.com/id/USE4life/
Team Name: Jorvik Viking Centre
Team Tag: Jrvk
Players:
USE4life 62810
Bladeson 63203
Nozza 60535
Shagon 492854
Bluck 1478606
Did you read and accept the rules? Yes!
Last minute update (love the drama)
Name: Saiko GUID: 344916
Assemble, hussars! From deep down the sewers of the arena, you hear the roarings of the crowd waiting for blood. You and your mount both shaking, you get mentally reading for what's to come: The glory of the Pit, a fight to the death. You have been training hard for this and are eager to prove your worth to the community. But you ain't standing alone. Your crew is there with you, united in combats, willing to give their best on your side. Will the Pit crowns its first cavalry champions in your person? Or will you fall on the dust of the fighting ground, like many before you. From now on, you write your own legend. From now on, you enter the Fighting Pit!
GG fun tournament!
GG fun tournament!very unsatisfying ending for us though - gg wp frenchies(https://preview.redd.it/nvkskzjctr361.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=d03baf6a41ae019a7fce25e6ab408b79fdcfce10)[close]
Very fun tournament, congrats to the winners (not bedo), congrats to my team for getting second and congrats to the third place PCs.
When are people going to write my name right.lil pypa
And thanks for hosting :)