Flying Squirrel Entertainment

Mount & Blade Warband: Napoleonic Wars => Regiments => North & South: First Manassas => Released Modifications => Confederates => Topic started by: Grey on March 02, 2013, 11:58:18 pm

Title: 1st Texas Infantry Regiment. **HEAVILY ACTIVE LARGE REGIMENT**
Post by: Grey on March 02, 2013, 11:58:18 pm


(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.allenscreations.com%2Fimages%2Fmg1to.jpg&hash=471eef56fcd9fb5e254ae214983b66d65eab3927)





Muster Roll
Officers
Captain Grey
First Lieutenant Fremantle

Enlisted
NCO's
Regimental Sergeant Major Casterline
Sergeant Lavin
Corporal Hypoxia
Corporal Shlomo
Privates
Roger
BaronSMASH
Daryl
Mort
Ray
Wyatt
Cleetus
Jebediah
Tatreau
SJMarriott
Elliatio
XYZ
CzarCzar
ToxicAxid
Picaso
Lazer
Thom

Cooking Staff
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn2.americancivilwar.com%2Famericancivilwar-cdn%2Fpictures%2Farmy_cook.jpg&hash=3893483456be9b6ce82f85da0a1906dc2001d22f)
Chef Aase
_________________________________
[close]


Ranks
Captain
First Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
Sergeant Major
First Sergeant
Sergeant
Corporal
Private
Volunteer

[close]

Contact Info
TS:silverbolt.bluefangsolutions.com:9992
Steam
Grey: https://steamcommunity.com/id/NBF/
Casterline: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198008191544/
Fremantle: https://steamcommunity.com/id/kensmooth/

[close]
?
[close]
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1133.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fm584%2FWhisper99r%2Fcizgii.png&hash=9ec62cfcb14caafa43899f7b0f36991859fc36d9)
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1133.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fm584%2FWhisper99r%2Fcizgii.png&hash=9ec62cfcb14caafa43899f7b0f36991859fc36d9)
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi48.tinypic.com%2F2w24nxd.jpg&hash=d5323904da814eae7e54b2bc2e4f11b1e9c56dca)

History

Quote
Houston Tri-Weekly Telegraph
Dispatches from the front

Quote
“They always take the Texans to the hottest part of the field.”
H. Watters Berryman of Co I, 1st Tex in a letter to his mother*

The fierce reputation of the 1st Texas Infantry, is judgement passed by actions upon the field and familiar to the reader.  I aim to provide multifold illumination of this ragged assembly of warriors.  Hailing from East Texas, these men survive on the edge of civilization.  Good on horse, familiar with the gun and relatively malevolent.  Beyond their homesteads the Comanche and other india tribes still roam free, warlike tribes who live by raiding and existing no concept of mercy for man woman or child, whether fighting each other or the white man.  It is altogether the environment one expects to create the fearless, rugged, men of the 1st Texas.  Used as spies, scouts and commonly sharpshooters, these Texans do things their way, and in recent ation "operated beyond and independently of the regular pickets, and soon became a terror to the enemy." (Rev. Davis, discussing actions before Seven Pines)**

Quote
“I never saw such pretty country or an old one in my life,…splendid crops have been raised in this part of Maryland and everything good to eat.”  H. Watters Berryman of Co I 1st Texas describes Maryland*

A ragged, underfed, poorly supplied bunch, they are habitually cited for lack of shoes during formal reviews by commanding officers.  Along with it's fellow Texas Brigade regiments, it suffers noteriety for it's discipline off the battlefield.  This lack of discipline vex the generals and blunders them into trouble, but even then they often came out ahead, such as the rout of Union occupiers in the "Roasting Ears Fight" of August 23, 1862, during the lead up to 2nd Manassas.  All starting when "a number of the brigade entered the cornfield (against Lee's explicit order against foraging) to secure breakfast. Unknown to the Texans, a large Federal scouting party from Gen. Franz Sigel's Federal Division had camped on the northern edge of the same cornfield. The inevitable encounter between the opposing forces in the middle of the cornfield resulted in fist fighting, wrestling, and volleys of roasting ears. Outnumbered, the Federals soon withdrew, leaving the Texans in sole possession of the field. To appease the hunger of his troops in a manner suitable to Gen. Lee, Texas Brigade Quartermaster J. H. Littlefield purchased the entire 100-acre cornfield. Foraging thus became an authorized activity, and the each of Hood's men found himself well satisfied with the spoils"**.

Quote
At Culpeper Virgina on June 8, 1863 Jeb Stuart put on a show for the army in the form of a giant review of his cavlary. General Lee was present by invention and so was General Sam Hood. Not only was Hood present but he brought his famous Texas Brigade with him, thereby precipitating a mild crisis. Fitzhugh Lee invited Hood. To "come and see the review, and bring any of his people." Obviously "any of his people" was meant to cover his staff, but on the second day of the review the gray masses of Hood’s men emerged with glittering bayonets from the woods in the direction of the Rapidan.

"You invited me and my people. " Hood said as he shook hands with Fitz lee, "and you see I have brought them." This was indeed a crisis. If any of the members of the Texas Brigade should holler out "Here’s your mule!" at the cavalry the grand review would certainly turn into a free for all of fisticuffs. Don’t let them yell "Here’s your mule!", Fitz Lee warned. "If they do, we’ll charge you." Wade Hampton laughed. But Hood took it more seriously and bade his men not to.

Most of the members of the Texas Brigade behaved themselves that day but one of the men could not restrain himself. Turning to a comrade he said loud enough for others to hear: "Wouldn’t we clean them out, if old Hood would only let us loose on them".**

Even on well deserved furlough these Texans are prone to stirring the pot, such as the conflict at Paddy`s Hollow on September 10, 1863 in Wilmington, when "the brigade made its presence known in the unsavory waterfront section known as 'Paddy's Hollow.' Having had several rounds of John Barleycorn, the men became boisterous and obnoxious. When a local police force was summoned to expel the revellers, the men mistook the officers in their blue uniforms for Yankees, formed a battle line, and staggered to a charge. One constable in his late fifties was badly beaten about the face, another was knocked down by a shillelagh blow to the ear, and a third officer suffered two knife wounds in his side. The policemen withdrew, leaving the waterfront to the mercy of the rowdy men"**.  The regiment you wish is out of sight, hopefully not out foraging in cornfields causing ruckus, but perhaps bivouaced in an unseen gully,  when the politicians from Richmond want to be impressed by a kept, orderly show of arms.  Nevertheless, when the generals plan assault upon the enemy, these 1st Texans are a most welcome sight to eyes, and thus their rambuctious natures are suffered.

In my next correspondence the reader is treated with witness accounts of the ragged 1st Texas Infantry in recent field actions.

Quote
"What would your Texans have done, sir, if I had ordered them to charge and drive back the enemy?" Uncle Joe asked after Eltham's Landing, and Hood replied, "I suppose, General, they would have driven them into the river, and tried to swim out and capture the gunboats."***


* “First Texas in the Cornfield.” by George E. Otott
** http://texas-brigade.org
*** Sears, Stephen W. "To the Gates of Richmond: The Peninsula Campaign"

Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on March 28, 2014, 09:11:52 pm
Roster updated, we're back baby.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: LucasAvis on March 28, 2014, 09:14:15 pm
Welcome back 1st Texas, glad to have you with us fighting these tyrant unionists!
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on July 26, 2015, 07:43:08 pm
It seems people think we have died! We're still alive.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Nick Lazanis on July 26, 2015, 07:46:55 pm
That makes 3 first texas

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=19511.0

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=24916.0

I am confused :c
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on July 26, 2015, 07:48:40 pm
That makes 3 first texas

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=19511.0

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=24916.0

I am confused :c
Us to, but we have been around since secession. https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=985.0
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Josef733 on July 27, 2015, 02:24:17 pm
That makes 3 first texas

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=19511.0

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=24916.0

I am confused :c
Us to, but we have been around since secession. https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=985.0

There was also another 1st Texas in the ANV which only lasted 2 weeks.
We thought anyone else who had the name 1st Texas was dead long ago.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Reznov on July 27, 2015, 08:29:10 pm
They havent attended events in ages Josef, thats why i find his claim rather stupid.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: jackbee on July 27, 2015, 09:16:17 pm
Doesn't matter how you find his claim. What matters is they claimed it first.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on July 27, 2015, 09:17:40 pm
They havent attended events in ages Josef, thats why i find his claim rather stupid.
Attending events or not in a while doesn't matter. The fact is that we have been around since secession days and we are keeping our claim on this name, I don't want people to think just because we may not be active for a while means it is okay to take our name. We payed to reserve this name for BCoF whenever it releases, just trying to remind people we are here.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Devmc99 on July 27, 2015, 09:40:39 pm
Reserving the name for bcof had nothing to do with N&S..........
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on July 27, 2015, 09:51:43 pm
Reserving the name for bcof had nothing to do with N&S..........
If we allow these groups to form and hang around for a while it causes a problem for us we would rather avoid as it causes confusion. Besides BCoF we have reserved our name in several mods well before they even thought about it. So regardless our name is still taken.. by us.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: hairywarhero on July 27, 2015, 10:06:36 pm
As the North&South Community Supervisor and also Mod on this thread, I've looked into what you've said and also done some investigating of my own you seem to be on a stand down or have been inactive since 29 March, 2014. You have been inactive well over a year now. Even though you brought the rights to the name on BCoF this is north and south which is completely a different game in itself. Even though you have been around since secession which is a long time ago. Think its about time you either allow someone else use the name or at least get back into the North And South community
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on July 27, 2015, 10:25:46 pm
As the North&South Community Supervisor and also Mod on this thread, I've looked into what you've said and also done some investigating of my own you seem to be on a stand down or have been inactive since 29 March, 2014. You have been inactive well over a year now. Even though you brought the rights to the name on BCoF this is north and south which is completely a different game in itself. Even though you have been around since secession which is a long time ago. Think its about time you either allow someone else use the name or at least get back into the North And South community
I'm just trying to make it clear that we have reserved the name for BCoF, and we are the original 1st Texas.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: hairywarhero on July 27, 2015, 10:28:49 pm
As the North&South Community Supervisor and also Mod on this thread, I've looked into what you've said and also done some investigating of my own you seem to be on a stand down or have been inactive since 29 March, 2014. You have been inactive well over a year now. Even though you brought the rights to the name on BCoF this is north and south which is completely a different game in itself. Even though you have been around since secession which is a long time ago. Think its about time you either allow someone else use the name or at least get back into the North And South community
I'm not asking them to give the name up for N&S, I'm just trying to make it clear that we have reserved the name for BCoF, and we are the original 1st Texas.

That's fine then. So you are allowing this regiment to the rights for the name of 1stTX for N&S ONLY
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: LaBelle on July 27, 2015, 10:31:33 pm
As the North&South Community Supervisor and also Mod on this thread, I've looked into what you've said and also done some investigating of my own you seem to be on a stand down or have been inactive since 29 March, 2014. You have been inactive well over a year now. Even though you brought the rights to the name on BCoF this is north and south which is completely a different game in itself. Even though you have been around since secession which is a long time ago. Think its about time you either allow someone else use the name or at least get back into the North And South community

No.  In no other regiment-based game or mod has this been acceptable, and to suggest that someone give up their name is hilariously bad.  You have no authority to force someone to declaim a regiment.  If the 1st Texas wants to keep their name, the Partisan Rangers support them.  I mean shit, if you went inactive would you want someone claiming your username?  No.  You'd have none of it.  We all have real lives, and if we have to go inactive because of those lives, tough shit to every Tom, Dick and Jane that wants our names and regiments.

Reposted due to a non-specified delete.

Edit: I've also screenshotted this post, and will take another delete without specification to the proper channels.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on July 27, 2015, 10:41:37 pm
As the North&South Community Supervisor and also Mod on this thread, I've looked into what you've said and also done some investigating of my own you seem to be on a stand down or have been inactive since 29 March, 2014. You have been inactive well over a year now. Even though you brought the rights to the name on BCoF this is north and south which is completely a different game in itself. Even though you have been around since secession which is a long time ago. Think its about time you either allow someone else use the name or at least get back into the North And South community

No.  In no other regiment-based game or mod has this been acceptable, and to suggest that someone give up their name is hilariously bad.  You have no authority to force someone to declaim a regiment.  If the 1st Texas wants to keep their name, the Partisan Rangers support them.  I mean shit, if you went inactive would you want someone claiming your username?  No.  You'd have none of it.  We all have real lives, and if we have to go inactive because of those lives, tough shit to every Tom, Dick and Jane that wants our names and regiments.

Reposted due to a non-specified delete.

Edit: I've also screenshotted this post, and will take another delete without specification to the proper channels.
Actually, this post is quite on topic and I do agree. I think I will be mustering the 1st Texas to return to N&S. Thank you hairywarhero and LaBelle for pointing us in the right direction.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: hairywarhero on July 27, 2015, 10:43:49 pm
As the North&South Community Supervisor and also Mod on this thread, I've looked into what you've said and also done some investigating of my own you seem to be on a stand down or have been inactive since 29 March, 2014. You have been inactive well over a year now. Even though you brought the rights to the name on BCoF this is north and south which is completely a different game in itself. Even though you have been around since secession which is a long time ago. Think its about time you either allow someone else use the name or at least get back into the North And South community

No.  In no other regiment-based game or mod has this been acceptable, and to suggest that someone give up their name is hilariously bad.  You have no authority to force someone to declaim a regiment.  If the 1st Texas wants to keep their name, the Partisan Rangers support them.  I mean shit, if you went inactive would you want someone claiming your username?  No.  You'd have none of it.  We all have real lives, and if we have to go inactive because of those lives, tough shit to every Tom, Dick and Jane that wants our names and regiments.

Reposted due to a non-specified delete.

Edit: I've also screenshotted this post, and will take another delete without specification to the proper channels.
Actually, this post is quite on topic and I do agree. I think I will be mustering the 1st Texas to return to N&S. Thank you hairywarhero and LaBelle for pointing us in the right direction.

Thats fine then i'll inform the other 1st Texas
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on July 27, 2015, 10:56:44 pm
As the North&South Community Supervisor and also Mod on this thread, I've looked into what you've said and also done some investigating of my own you seem to be on a stand down or have been inactive since 29 March, 2014. You have been inactive well over a year now. Even though you brought the rights to the name on BCoF this is north and south which is completely a different game in itself. Even though you have been around since secession which is a long time ago. Think its about time you either allow someone else use the name or at least get back into the North And South community

No.  In no other regiment-based game or mod has this been acceptable, and to suggest that someone give up their name is hilariously bad.  You have no authority to force someone to declaim a regiment.  If the 1st Texas wants to keep their name, the Partisan Rangers support them.  I mean shit, if you went inactive would you want someone claiming your username?  No.  You'd have none of it.  We all have real lives, and if we have to go inactive because of those lives, tough shit to every Tom, Dick and Jane that wants our names and regiments.

Reposted due to a non-specified delete.

Edit: I've also screenshotted this post, and will take another delete without specification to the proper channels.
Actually, this post is quite on topic and I do agree. I think I will be mustering the 1st Texas to return to N&S. Thank you hairywarhero and LaBelle for pointing us in the right direction.

Thats fine then i'll inform the other 1st Texas
Thank you sir.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Josef733 on July 27, 2015, 11:31:12 pm
They havent attended events in ages Josef, thats why i find his claim rather stupid.
Attending events or not in a while doesn't matter. The fact is that we have been around since secession days and we are keeping our claim on this name, I don't want people to think just because we may not be active for a while means it is okay to take our name. We payed to reserve this name for BCoF whenever it releases, just trying to remind people we are here.
You don't have a claim of no one recognises you as the 1st Texas.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Josef733 on July 27, 2015, 11:35:48 pm
Doesn't matter how you find his claim. What matters is they claimed it first.
What also matters is their activity. If they haven't been around for ages, why should they still have the right to the name when there is already another 1st Texas that's been active?
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Reznov on July 27, 2015, 11:43:21 pm
Doesn't matter how you find his claim. What matters is they claimed it first.
What also matters is their activity. If they haven't been around for ages, why should they still have the right to the name when there is already another 1st Texas that's been active?

Will agree on that one
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: LaBelle on July 27, 2015, 11:54:02 pm
Why should they still have the right?  Because they claimed it.  You guys can pick another regiment.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: jackbee on July 28, 2015, 12:24:36 am
Plenty of unique regiments out there that haven't been claimed, no need to take other peoples.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on July 28, 2015, 12:37:40 am
Doesn't matter how you find his claim. What matters is they claimed it first.
What also matters is their activity. If they haven't been around for ages, why should they still have the right to the name when there is already another 1st Texas that's been active?

Will agree on that one
There isn't "already another" we have been here for ages, we have seen many imposters try to claim 1st Texas as their own, you just tried to take another regiments name, its not like there happened to be another 1st Texas after we have been here.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Earth Bby on July 28, 2015, 02:13:13 am
If a name is claimed by a regiment that they provide proof they're still kicking/planning to use the name is entirely theirs. If a regiment springs up with the same name and the current owner (grey) wants to continue using the name the person taking the name has to change, 1st come 1st served.

As Josefs 1stTexas is rather new it wont be too hard to change, Grey on the other hand has a lovely thread and history using the name. I've seen him not only here but bumping his BCoF thread often.

+ From what Mels has told me he wants to continue with his regiment into BCoF, to stop any later friction I say Josef/mels must change in order to nip this in the bud.

Thank you.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Nick Lazanis on July 28, 2015, 11:10:44 am
Finally. This will be sorted.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: LaBelle on July 28, 2015, 02:27:42 pm
Doesn't matter how you find his claim. What matters is they claimed it first.
What also matters is their activity. If they haven't been around for ages, why should they still have the right to the name when there is already another 1st Texas that's been active?

Will agree on that one

You're entirely biased.  I remember you from the old days, you hated the 1st Texas.  You have no say here.  The issue is closed, have a great day.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on August 03, 2015, 06:05:23 am
Good battle tonight lads.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: LaBelle on August 03, 2015, 08:18:36 pm
Good battle tonight lads.

PRL would have surely been routed without the fine men from the 1st Texas single-handedly holding the flank.
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry "Ragged Old First"
Post by: Grey on April 03, 2016, 08:08:05 pm
We are returning after an extended leave. Anyone wanting to join the original 1st Texas Infantry go here silverbolt.bluefangsolutions.com:9992 or PM me, or add me on steam https://steamcommunity.com/id/NBF/
We will be playing in War of Rights!
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry Company M. "Sumter Light Infantry" Original 1st Texas
Post by: Mittens on July 24, 2016, 06:24:15 pm
hey guys great use of name, great activity, you're doing a great job keep it up, nobody could think a better use of that name! OH WELL
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry Company M. "Sumter Light Infantry" Original 1st Texas
Post by: Captain_Frosty on July 24, 2016, 06:35:10 pm
hey guys great use of name, great activity, you're doing a great job keep it up, nobody could think a better use of that name! OH WELL
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fci.memecdn.com%2F536%2F5406536.jpg&hash=a88173cca2c75160cf286952c1de7de993f87957)
Title: Re: 1st Texas Infantry Company M. "Sumter Light Infantry" Original 1st Texas
Post by: Grey on September 12, 2016, 10:34:12 pm
Still heavily active. 3-4 events per week. Attendance is 20-30.