But isn't there a winner of Group B who deserved an advantage? I understand that both winners of Group A should be given same chances but i think it's more unfair to take the advantage of the Group B winner than opposing both Group A winners with enemies of a different level. Otherwhise we don't need to play the last match of the Group Stage. Our opponent won't be able to become 2nd or 1st of our group and when the matches of the upper bracket will be randomized, the outcome of our last match match wouldn't matter (OG hast 7 rounds won, GK too. But OG has still one Match again CP and needs one more round to be 1st place alone).
Don't understand me wrong. The matches are cool and i would like to play all of them! And it's very good that we can discuss this topic. I understand your opinion but maybe consider this point of view:
Both winners of Group A missed their chance of gaining an advantage (but they still reached semi finals!). But most likely there is a winner of Group B who definately deserved one. Maybe i understand this wrong but it seems like the advantage is being taken to balance two coalitions which both didn't manage to gain one.
If you explain this to me i will be open to your was to go. I just didn't get the point of the sense behind randomizing
Spoiler
Maybe there is a way to determine a winner of Group A. If both coalitions agree they could face each other for sudden death or maybe best of three. So both would have a chance of becoming the only winner of their group. But maybe i'm wrong and this would cost too much time or whatever xD
But really thank you for talking to me and understanding me! That's a rare thing in most tounaments and should be admired!
