I am currently digging into the 63e matter, along with any involvement of Karth in the entire picture.
I will put this to rest once and for all.
Lol anti-Karth, more like started by a bunch of salty ex-63e members who influenced a bunch of other bandwagoners, and now I get blamed for almost every single punishment given out of these forums. I am not complaining, but again just know this 'anti-Karth' stuff is full of nothing.im not an ex 63e or a bandwagoner ???
Lol anti-Karth, more like started by a bunch of salty ex-63e members who influenced a bunch of other bandwagoners, and now I get blamed for almost every single punishment given out of these forums. I am not complaining, but again just know this 'anti-Karth' stuff is full of nothing.
Down with the 63e regime!!!!!!!!!11
Lol anti-Karth, more like started by a bunch of salty ex-63e members who influenced a bunch of other bandwagoners, and now I get blamed for almost every single punishment given out of these forums. I am not complaining, but again just know this 'anti-Karth' stuff is full of nothing.Even if "anti-Karth stuff is full of nothing" you are still so unpopular (hated) smart company would remove you but FSE doesn't cares they are just milking few people who believe BCoF is gonna ever be released. But we all know you are just arrogant as fuck and we got so much on you. It is just a matter of question if FSE will listen to CRs or it will be proven CRs have no power what so ever.
If you want this whole thing to end, you and karth are gonna have to take this seriously tbh.
Just because the EU 63e hasn't started the things the NA side did doesn't mean they won't. 63e is an EU and NA problemIf you want this whole thing to end, you and karth are gonna have to take this seriously tbh.
Or, and I'm just throwing this out there and it's a little crazy, you could do your duty as the NA CR and try and assist in getting the matter solved. The EU CR has pledged to help and to be frank it's not his problem! It's an NA problem.
Just because the EU 63e hasn't started the things the NA side did doesn't mean they won't. 63e is an EU and NA problemIf you want this whole thing to end, you and karth are gonna have to take this seriously tbh.
Or, and I'm just throwing this out there and it's a little crazy, you could do your duty as the NA CR and try and assist in getting the matter solved. The EU CR has pledged to help and to be frank it's not his problem! It's an NA problem.
It's also EU problem since Karth shits on us as well.If you want this whole thing to end, you and karth are gonna have to take this seriously tbh.
Or, and I'm just throwing this out there and it's a little crazy, you could do your duty as the NA CR and try and assist in getting the matter solved. The EU CR has pledged to help and to be frank it's not his problem! It's an NA problem.
It's also EU problem since Karth shits on us as well.
ffs camperz #63eTactics
Seeing as how I didn't mention you, haven't talked to you, and you spelt my name wrong, I don't know where you got your assumptions from.Just because the EU 63e hasn't started the things the NA side did doesn't mean they won't. 63e is an EU and NA problemIf you want this whole thing to end, you and karth are gonna have to take this seriously tbh.
Or, and I'm just throwing this out there and it's a little crazy, you could do your duty as the NA CR and try and assist in getting the matter solved. The EU CR has pledged to help and to be frank it's not his problem! It's an NA problem.
And I thought you liked me Theoden ;)
this clown is our community rep? lol for crying out loud
Munj you need to learn how to take a joke man
If you want this whole thing to end, you and karth are gonna have to take this seriously tbh.
Or, and I'm just throwing this out there and it's a little crazy, you could do your duty as the NA CR and try and assist in getting the matter solved. The EU CR has pledged to help and to be frank it's not his problem! It's an NA problem.
Lol anti-Karth, more like started by a bunch of salty ex-63e members who influenced a bunch of other bandwagoners, and now I get blamed for almost every single punishment given out of these forums. I am not complaining, but again just know this 'anti-Karth' stuff is full of nothing.I'm neither but I still hate karf > : )
What about you guys talk about it on TS...Sure , *12seconds later* hi karth! *permanently banned from ts,reason: troll"
Considering pushing for the community lists threads to get moved back to the community board.Yes please it's more accessible.
Thoughts?
Considering pushing for the community lists threads to get moved back to the community board.theres too much banter for them to be in the community section
Thoughts?
Ok maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?Basically saying we are fucking up community but it's okay since we pay for it.
1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
Ok maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?Basically saying we are fucking up community but it's okay since we pay for it.
1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
Ok maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?Basically saying we are fucking up community but it's okay since we pay for it.
1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
... That doesn't make sense but okay. Also apologies for my last post, did that one on my phone.
Ok maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?Basically saying we are fucking up community but it's okay since we pay for it.
1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
... That doesn't make sense but okay. Also apologies for my last post, did that one on my phone.
Read this again maybe then you will make sense out of my post:
Many new regiments fail simply because they are unable to recruit a substantial number of people to make their regiment viable. One of the main reasons that this occurs is because of the 63e NA siege. The 63e NA siege has seemingly killed NA 1 and all of the other servers that in the past regiments have been able to recruit on. The 63e runs their server as many other smaller regimental servers do with the policy of No Recruiting unless you are in the 63e. When a new player buys the game and eventually progresses to playing multiplayer in NW they will most likely go to a very populated server with good ping and in a game mode which is exciting for someone who is new such as siege. Because of this a vast majority of new players go to 63e NA siege and a large portion of those players if they like the game are going to be interested in joining regiments and progressing farther into the NA community. Unfortunately, almost all of them join the 63e and then stay there for the duration of their regimental experience hence the 1,400 people in their cadet steam group. Unfortunately, the 63e does a very bad job at retaining people and keeping them active despite their best efforts I’m sure. But you cannot individually give different cadets the attention and comradery they need to want to stay and be active if there are that many of them. What the 63e does a very good job at although is keeping their community very tight nit and taking every opportunity to throw shade by calling them trolls or just simply shit talking them. Making the new recruits feel like there is no regiment as good as the 63e and everyone else in the community are trolls. Also another reason why people who join the 63e don’t leave is because they are harassed by other regiments quite often simply because they are in the 63e. I’ve done it myself and I know a shit load of people who have also.
TLDR: 63e na siege makes it very hard for regs to recruit new players. Once players join 63e the majority of them quit the game or stay in the 63e and don’t leave because the 63e tells them the rest of the community are trolls. Also 63e is shit talked by much of na community when seen which makes new 63e players not like other regiments.
1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
"Ok maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?"Saying something like that is extremely condescending and exactly what I would expect out of someone in a position of authority in the 63e.
Retard? These are taken at the same time btw.SpoilerOk maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?Basically saying we are fucking up community but it's okay since we pay for it.
1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
... That doesn't make sense but okay. Also apologies for my last post, did that one on my phone.
Read this again maybe then you will make sense out of my post:
Many new regiments fail simply because they are unable to recruit a substantial number of people to make their regiment viable. One of the main reasons that this occurs is because of the 63e NA siege. The 63e NA siege has seemingly killed NA 1 and all of the other servers that in the past regiments have been able to recruit on. The 63e runs their server as many other smaller regimental servers do with the policy of No Recruiting unless you are in the 63e. When a new player buys the game and eventually progresses to playing multiplayer in NW they will most likely go to a very populated server with good ping and in a game mode which is exciting for someone who is new such as siege. Because of this a vast majority of new players go to 63e NA siege and a large portion of those players if they like the game are going to be interested in joining regiments and progressing farther into the NA community. Unfortunately, almost all of them join the 63e and then stay there for the duration of their regimental experience hence the 1,400 people in their cadet steam group. Unfortunately, the 63e does a very bad job at retaining people and keeping them active despite their best efforts I’m sure. But you cannot individually give different cadets the attention and comradery they need to want to stay and be active if there are that many of them. What the 63e does a very good job at although is keeping their community very tight nit and taking every opportunity to throw shade by calling them trolls or just simply shit talking them. Making the new recruits feel like there is no regiment as good as the 63e and everyone else in the community are trolls. Also another reason why people who join the 63e don’t leave is because they are harassed by other regiments quite often simply because they are in the 63e. I’ve done it myself and I know a shit load of people who have also.
TLDR: 63e na siege makes it very hard for regs to recruit new players. Once players join 63e the majority of them quit the game or stay in the 63e and don’t leave because the 63e tells them the rest of the community are trolls. Also 63e is shit talked by much of na community when seen which makes new 63e players not like other regiments.[close]1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
Think you missed the part before it, so perhaps you actually need to read a bit. Also, 63e Siege killed NA1... Lol.. You should go on NA1 on a Thursday, tell me how dead it is. Also, the 63e has about 30+ members who are 1 year veterans or above, so you're just absolutely gone mad mate. For someone who hasn't come into our TeamSpeak, sat down and spoke with someone in a calm and civil manner without shitting your pants, and maybe thinking a little bit about the sewage that spews from that hole you call a mouth, perhaps you would say something intelligent in your life.
"Ok maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?"Saying something like that is extremely condescending and exactly what I would expect out of someone in a position of authority in the 63e.
3. 63e banning people on TS.
I'm 100% sure this is because of your perm ban. I believe you came to our event and posed as Offizer, who was Colonel at the time, on the in game server. And I helieved you tked a few times on purpose to make it look like ray did it, so he just perm banned you on the spot. So yeah, shows the type of person you were at the time. As for the three times leaving, we value loyalty and don't like soible reggers. A lot of regiments do let double regging occur, when tbh that's what kills competitive. Regiments letting people double reg kills competitive scenes. Because a regiments skill is never their own most of the time. Imagine if like olofmeister just hoped on whatever team he wanted to and went to whatever match he pleased. So yeah, we value loyalty and punish people who 1. Double reg or 2. Leave a certain amount of times / reg hop. That is in our right to exercise.
It is your right to have rules in place but punishing someone like cluelesswill who is hardly a reg hopper and just happened to leave your regiment 3 times since 2012 and has been hanging out with people from the 63e including yourself since 2012 is cruel and unusual punishment and makes people in the community hate you. Silly rules that excommunicate players from communities are stupid and should be done away with. Secondly I was permanently banned from the 63e server when I wasn't even connected for coming into the server during a training announcing in teamspeak that I was playing as Offizer and then participating in the training. Another example of a banning which is perfectly within your rights is the banning of Dukers from the 63e teamspeak. He went in the teamspeak as a 2ndary rep for his regiment during a 63e organized linebattle and was then permanently banned from the teamspeak after entering a 63e channel and asking for the info to the server while they were in the event. These are not secular cases either this has happened many times and has made the 63e many enemies.
Also I had you on the asshole list to begin with im not sure wtf you're talking about..
Retard? These are taken at the same time btw.SpoilerOk maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?Basically saying we are fucking up community but it's okay since we pay for it.
1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
... That doesn't make sense but okay. Also apologies for my last post, did that one on my phone.
Read this again maybe then you will make sense out of my post:
Many new regiments fail simply because they are unable to recruit a substantial number of people to make their regiment viable. One of the main reasons that this occurs is because of the 63e NA siege. The 63e NA siege has seemingly killed NA 1 and all of the other servers that in the past regiments have been able to recruit on. The 63e runs their server as many other smaller regimental servers do with the policy of No Recruiting unless you are in the 63e. When a new player buys the game and eventually progresses to playing multiplayer in NW they will most likely go to a very populated server with good ping and in a game mode which is exciting for someone who is new such as siege. Because of this a vast majority of new players go to 63e NA siege and a large portion of those players if they like the game are going to be interested in joining regiments and progressing farther into the NA community. Unfortunately, almost all of them join the 63e and then stay there for the duration of their regimental experience hence the 1,400 people in their cadet steam group. Unfortunately, the 63e does a very bad job at retaining people and keeping them active despite their best efforts I’m sure. But you cannot individually give different cadets the attention and comradery they need to want to stay and be active if there are that many of them. What the 63e does a very good job at although is keeping their community very tight nit and taking every opportunity to throw shade by calling them trolls or just simply shit talking them. Making the new recruits feel like there is no regiment as good as the 63e and everyone else in the community are trolls. Also another reason why people who join the 63e don’t leave is because they are harassed by other regiments quite often simply because they are in the 63e. I’ve done it myself and I know a shit load of people who have also.
TLDR: 63e na siege makes it very hard for regs to recruit new players. Once players join 63e the majority of them quit the game or stay in the 63e and don’t leave because the 63e tells them the rest of the community are trolls. Also 63e is shit talked by much of na community when seen which makes new 63e players not like other regiments.[close]1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
Think you missed the part before it, so perhaps you actually need to read a bit. Also, 63e Siege killed NA1... Lol.. You should go on NA1 on a Thursday, tell me how dead it is. Also, the 63e has about 30+ members who are 1 year veterans or above, so you're just absolutely gone mad mate. For someone who hasn't come into our TeamSpeak, sat down and spoke with someone in a calm and civil manner without shitting your pants, and maybe thinking a little bit about the sewage that spews from that hole you call a mouth, perhaps you would say something intelligent in your life.Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/d9b85273ce21fe8e37decd0f722ded08.png)[close]Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/1ca24e00f2e93269e24ea9466c2dc10e.png)[close]
Dukers was banned well before the 1tes was banned from 63e events. The password was changed and dukers went into one of the 63e teamspeak channels to ask for the new password so he could join and was permanently banned. Also what the fuck are you talking about 'three servers' I only have two screen shots of two servers and I used them as an example because for the most part it is like that always. There is an entire thread on FSE about reviving NA 1 because it is fucking DEAD! I think you must have dyslexia or some shit because you really lack any basic reading or communication skills at all.Spoiler"Ok maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?"Saying something like that is extremely condescending and exactly what I would expect out of someone in a position of authority in the 63e.
3. 63e banning people on TS.
I'm 100% sure this is because of your perm ban. I believe you came to our event and posed as Offizer, who was Colonel at the time, on the in game server. And I helieved you tked a few times on purpose to make it look like ray did it, so he just perm banned you on the spot. So yeah, shows the type of person you were at the time. As for the three times leaving, we value loyalty and don't like soible reggers. A lot of regiments do let double regging occur, when tbh that's what kills competitive. Regiments letting people double reg kills competitive scenes. Because a regiments skill is never their own most of the time. Imagine if like olofmeister just hoped on whatever team he wanted to and went to whatever match he pleased. So yeah, we value loyalty and punish people who 1. Double reg or 2. Leave a certain amount of times / reg hop. That is in our right to exercise.
It is your right to have rules in place but punishing someone like cluelesswill who is hardly a reg hopper and just happened to leave your regiment 3 times since 2012 and has been hanging out with people from the 63e including yourself since 2012 is cruel and unusual punishment and makes people in the community hate you. Silly rules that excommunicate players from communities are stupid and should be done away with. Secondly I was permanently banned from the 63e server when I wasn't even connected for coming into the server during a training announcing in teamspeak that I was playing as Offizer and then participating in the training. Another example of a banning which is perfectly within your rights is the banning of Dukers from the 63e teamspeak. He went in the teamspeak as a 2ndary rep for his regiment during a 63e organized linebattle and was then permanently banned from the teamspeak after entering a 63e channel and asking for the info to the server while they were in the event. These are not secular cases either this has happened many times and has made the 63e many enemies.
Also I had you on the asshole list to begin with im not sure wtf you're talking about..[close]
I personally don't know CluelessWill, so I don't actually know him at all. I've only seen him come to Officers channel here and there, never really participated with the current community. But I hear good things, I wasn't even aware he got banned to be honest. It is fully in your opinion if you choose to not like our policies, that is your right. As for your ban and Dukers, I fail to see your point. You got banned for impersonating an officer. As for the Dukers ban, I don't know if you realized, but the 1tes at the time were banned from our events for 1. Consistently breaking rules in servers 2. Teamkilling other regiments/bush pirating. He came into the TS into our event channel during an event and actually was disruptive during the event, we just banned him because we don't want banned individuals to be able to come and troll since it happens a lot. Again, within our right to do so. But from most of this hate, sounds more like personal affliction with not following our rules in our servers and then being mad about getting the consequence of doing so. Either way, you can always have personal animosity against our rules, but it always grows into anti-63e everything.SpoilerRetard? These are taken at the same time btw.SpoilerOk maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?Basically saying we are fucking up community but it's okay since we pay for it.
1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
... That doesn't make sense but okay. Also apologies for my last post, did that one on my phone.
Read this again maybe then you will make sense out of my post:
Many new regiments fail simply because they are unable to recruit a substantial number of people to make their regiment viable. One of the main reasons that this occurs is because of the 63e NA siege. The 63e NA siege has seemingly killed NA 1 and all of the other servers that in the past regiments have been able to recruit on. The 63e runs their server as many other smaller regimental servers do with the policy of No Recruiting unless you are in the 63e. When a new player buys the game and eventually progresses to playing multiplayer in NW they will most likely go to a very populated server with good ping and in a game mode which is exciting for someone who is new such as siege. Because of this a vast majority of new players go to 63e NA siege and a large portion of those players if they like the game are going to be interested in joining regiments and progressing farther into the NA community. Unfortunately, almost all of them join the 63e and then stay there for the duration of their regimental experience hence the 1,400 people in their cadet steam group. Unfortunately, the 63e does a very bad job at retaining people and keeping them active despite their best efforts I’m sure. But you cannot individually give different cadets the attention and comradery they need to want to stay and be active if there are that many of them. What the 63e does a very good job at although is keeping their community very tight nit and taking every opportunity to throw shade by calling them trolls or just simply shit talking them. Making the new recruits feel like there is no regiment as good as the 63e and everyone else in the community are trolls. Also another reason why people who join the 63e don’t leave is because they are harassed by other regiments quite often simply because they are in the 63e. I’ve done it myself and I know a shit load of people who have also.
TLDR: 63e na siege makes it very hard for regs to recruit new players. Once players join 63e the majority of them quit the game or stay in the 63e and don’t leave because the 63e tells them the rest of the community are trolls. Also 63e is shit talked by much of na community when seen which makes new 63e players not like other regiments.[close]1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
Think you missed the part before it, so perhaps you actually need to read a bit. Also, 63e Siege killed NA1... Lol.. You should go on NA1 on a Thursday, tell me how dead it is. Also, the 63e has about 30+ members who are 1 year veterans or above, so you're just absolutely gone mad mate. For someone who hasn't come into our TeamSpeak, sat down and spoke with someone in a calm and civil manner without shitting your pants, and maybe thinking a little bit about the sewage that spews from that hole you call a mouth, perhaps you would say something intelligent in your life.Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/d9b85273ce21fe8e37decd0f722ded08.png)[close]Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/1ca24e00f2e93269e24ea9466c2dc10e.png)[close][close]
Congratulations, you got screenshots of three servers during a certain time of the day and another of a server during another time of the day. Definitive proof of their overall monthly population. Thank you for proving to me proof of the level of ignorance all of this is being looked at with.
Dukers was banned well before the 1tes was banned from 63e events. The password was changed and dukers went into one of the 63e teamspeak channels to ask for the new password so he could join and was permanently banned. Also what the fuck are you talking about 'three servers' I only have two screen shots of two servers and I used them as an example because for the most part it is like that always. There is an entire thread on FSE about reviving NA 1 because it is fucking DEAD! I think you must have dyslexia or some shit because you really lack any basic reading or communication skills at all.Spoiler"Ok maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?"Saying something like that is extremely condescending and exactly what I would expect out of someone in a position of authority in the 63e.
3. 63e banning people on TS.
I'm 100% sure this is because of your perm ban. I believe you came to our event and posed as Offizer, who was Colonel at the time, on the in game server. And I helieved you tked a few times on purpose to make it look like ray did it, so he just perm banned you on the spot. So yeah, shows the type of person you were at the time. As for the three times leaving, we value loyalty and don't like soible reggers. A lot of regiments do let double regging occur, when tbh that's what kills competitive. Regiments letting people double reg kills competitive scenes. Because a regiments skill is never their own most of the time. Imagine if like olofmeister just hoped on whatever team he wanted to and went to whatever match he pleased. So yeah, we value loyalty and punish people who 1. Double reg or 2. Leave a certain amount of times / reg hop. That is in our right to exercise.
It is your right to have rules in place but punishing someone like cluelesswill who is hardly a reg hopper and just happened to leave your regiment 3 times since 2012 and has been hanging out with people from the 63e including yourself since 2012 is cruel and unusual punishment and makes people in the community hate you. Silly rules that excommunicate players from communities are stupid and should be done away with. Secondly I was permanently banned from the 63e server when I wasn't even connected for coming into the server during a training announcing in teamspeak that I was playing as Offizer and then participating in the training. Another example of a banning which is perfectly within your rights is the banning of Dukers from the 63e teamspeak. He went in the teamspeak as a 2ndary rep for his regiment during a 63e organized linebattle and was then permanently banned from the teamspeak after entering a 63e channel and asking for the info to the server while they were in the event. These are not secular cases either this has happened many times and has made the 63e many enemies.
Also I had you on the asshole list to begin with im not sure wtf you're talking about..[close]
I personally don't know CluelessWill, so I don't actually know him at all. I've only seen him come to Officers channel here and there, never really participated with the current community. But I hear good things, I wasn't even aware he got banned to be honest. It is fully in your opinion if you choose to not like our policies, that is your right. As for your ban and Dukers, I fail to see your point. You got banned for impersonating an officer. As for the Dukers ban, I don't know if you realized, but the 1tes at the time were banned from our events for 1. Consistently breaking rules in servers 2. Teamkilling other regiments/bush pirating. He came into the TS into our event channel during an event and actually was disruptive during the event, we just banned him because we don't want banned individuals to be able to come and troll since it happens a lot. Again, within our right to do so. But from most of this hate, sounds more like personal affliction with not following our rules in our servers and then being mad about getting the consequence of doing so. Either way, you can always have personal animosity against our rules, but it always grows into anti-63e everything.SpoilerRetard? These are taken at the same time btw.SpoilerOk maccle, I'm going to do my best to respond to your post, okay?Basically saying we are fucking up community but it's okay since we pay for it.
1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
... That doesn't make sense but okay. Also apologies for my last post, did that one on my phone.
Read this again maybe then you will make sense out of my post:
Many new regiments fail simply because they are unable to recruit a substantial number of people to make their regiment viable. One of the main reasons that this occurs is because of the 63e NA siege. The 63e NA siege has seemingly killed NA 1 and all of the other servers that in the past regiments have been able to recruit on. The 63e runs their server as many other smaller regimental servers do with the policy of No Recruiting unless you are in the 63e. When a new player buys the game and eventually progresses to playing multiplayer in NW they will most likely go to a very populated server with good ping and in a game mode which is exciting for someone who is new such as siege. Because of this a vast majority of new players go to 63e NA siege and a large portion of those players if they like the game are going to be interested in joining regiments and progressing farther into the NA community. Unfortunately, almost all of them join the 63e and then stay there for the duration of their regimental experience hence the 1,400 people in their cadet steam group. Unfortunately, the 63e does a very bad job at retaining people and keeping them active despite their best efforts I’m sure. But you cannot individually give different cadets the attention and comradery they need to want to stay and be active if there are that many of them. What the 63e does a very good job at although is keeping their community very tight nit and taking every opportunity to throw shade by calling them trolls or just simply shit talking them. Making the new recruits feel like there is no regiment as good as the 63e and everyone else in the community are trolls. Also another reason why people who join the 63e don’t leave is because they are harassed by other regiments quite often simply because they are in the 63e. I’ve done it myself and I know a shit load of people who have also.
TLDR: 63e na siege makes it very hard for regs to recruit new players. Once players join 63e the majority of them quit the game or stay in the 63e and don’t leave because the 63e tells them the rest of the community are trolls. Also 63e is shit talked by much of na community when seen which makes new 63e players not like other regiments.[close]1. 63e Siege. That's our own server payed by our community, we can do whatever we want with it. End of story, other regiments do it, and even siwi banned a few regiments from his siege and still ended up disbanding the server/regiment. Botice that the regiments who prosper are the ones who don't quit at it once the going gets tough.
Think you missed the part before it, so perhaps you actually need to read a bit. Also, 63e Siege killed NA1... Lol.. You should go on NA1 on a Thursday, tell me how dead it is. Also, the 63e has about 30+ members who are 1 year veterans or above, so you're just absolutely gone mad mate. For someone who hasn't come into our TeamSpeak, sat down and spoke with someone in a calm and civil manner without shitting your pants, and maybe thinking a little bit about the sewage that spews from that hole you call a mouth, perhaps you would say something intelligent in your life.Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/d9b85273ce21fe8e37decd0f722ded08.png)[close]Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/1ca24e00f2e93269e24ea9466c2dc10e.png)[close][close]
Congratulations, you got screenshots of three servers during a certain time of the day and another of a server during another time of the day. Definitive proof of their overall monthly population. Thank you for proving to me proof of the level of ignorance all of this is being looked at with.
Also squirts you fuckin dipshit the reason for my original post was to point out some of the different reasons why people dislike the 63e in an attempt to perhaps fix some of them for example. One of the main factors of hate is the fact that they own the recruiting scene and dont let others recruit. Perhaps one solution would be that new regiments that need recruits and face disbandment without them could have a specific time to go on the 63e siege server and see if anyone would be interested in joining a new forming regiment. Also to be quite honest I was quite impartial in my judgement of the 63e and even of you I put you down on my asshole list, yes as banter because I enjoy a bit of banter but the rest of it I was impartial.
Just because the server is privately owned doesn't mean people have to agree with their policies. Honestly if the 63e were to change their server policy to allow recruitment then they would probably receive a lot less hate.
Blaming other regiments for the 63e not doing 1v1s? Wut. As far as I know the 71st 2v2 never had any issues with regiments purposely tking their friends. Our lb was actually pretty serious. It's a shame cheesey didn't have time to run it anymore. And the chat was just like any other pub lb. This is just a theory but do you think its because the recruits didn't like sitting on a hill and shooting all 30 bullets? I know I hate that.
The 63e have 1400 people in their steam group. They have far less in the actual regiment. #PoorMemberRetention
You did a poor job of punishing swift when he left the 63e like 3 times and still was allowed to play in the NWL match. I think the whole banning people from the ts thing is just a meme. I stopped going into the 63e ts because bean bean would move me into a channel with him and say "BabyJ the legend! I saved the NW community by hosting NWL". #Bantz
For some reason alot of 63e members think that everyone is jealous of them and that all the regiments are beneath them. I mean they did refuse a 1v1 because the regiment wasn't "old" enough. Idk just from my expierences.
Just because the server is privately owned doesn't mean people have to agree with their policies. Honestly if the 63e were to change their server policy to allow recruitment then they would probably receive a lot less hate.
Blaming other regiments for the 63e not doing 1v1s? Wut. As far as I know the 71st 2v2 never had any issues with regiments purposely tking their friends. Our lb was actually pretty serious. It's a shame cheesey didn't have time to run it anymore. And the chat was just like any other pub lb. This is just a theory but do you think its because the recruits didn't like sitting on a hill and shooting all 30 bullets? I know I hate that.
You did a poor job of punishing swift when he left the 63e like 3 times and still was allowed to play in the NWL match. I think the whole banning people from the ts thing is just a meme. I stopped going into the 63e ts because bean bean would move me into a channel with him and say "BabyJ the legend! I saved the NW community by hosting NWL". #Bantz
Ok, so apparently us banning people from TeamSpeak = Us killing community is what I've heard.
Cause that has seemed to be the talking point for a lot of people.
Not gonna lie, even I have been perm banned from the 63e TS.I was muted (First offence) for quoting an original post that I agreed with. That is all I did, no quote pyramid or anything. Yet we see 63e members do so much worse, break forum rules blatantly and nothing happens. The double standard is so clear it is simply undeniable. The fact that our concerns are brushed off instantly as some BS conspiracy only proves our point even more.
Any grievances regarding teamspeak servers or in game servers are irrelevant to this forum. You can discuss them as much as you want, but they are beyond my powers to change or even influence them.
For someone who hasn't come into our TeamSpeak, sat down and spoke with someone in a calm and civil manner without shitting your pants, and maybe thinking a little bit about the sewage that spews from that hole you call a mouth, perhaps you would say something intelligent in your life.I was in your ts I even have screenshot of it if you want to I use it as avatar in our ts. Also nice personal attacks.
Any grievances regarding teamspeak servers or in game servers are irrelevant to this forum. You can discuss them as much as you want, but they are beyond my powers to change or even influence them.Fuck off this thread then, it's community thread and you are acting like you aren't part of the community.
For someone who hasn't come into our TeamSpeak, sat down and spoke with someone in a calm and civil manner without shitting your pants, and maybe thinking a little bit about the sewage that spews from that hole you call a mouth, perhaps you would say something intelligent in your life.I was in your ts I even have screenshot of it if you want to I use it as avatar in our ts. Also nice personal attacks.Spoilerhe got salty its okay boiis[close]
Just because you monopolized public play = recruitment in fair way doesn't means it's morally acceptable and good for community. 63e has power over NA community and now it's abusing it but its okay boys they got to that power fair and square.
Jesus Christ. 80% of what you guys are talking about is in no way even relevant to the actual forum or forum policies. That's not something you can change. As for what me and my regiment have been getting 'accused' of most of those accusations are false, but I won't go in depth or respond to them as this isn't the place to do that.In-game server and ts are irrelevant but you are still guilty of being biased admin and making questionable decision that negatively effected community, why would smart company keep a mod like that?
Jesus Christ. 80% of what you guys are talking about is in no way even relevant to the actual forum or forum policies. That's not something you can change. As for what me and my regiment have been getting 'accused' of most of those accusations are false, but I won't go in depth or respond to them as this isn't the place to do that.Nothing I said was false
Jesus Christ. 80% of what you guys are talking about is in no way even relevant to the actual forum or forum policies. That's not something you can change. As for what me and my regiment have been getting 'accused' of most of those accusations are false, but I won't go in depth or respond to them as this isn't the place to do that.Nothing I said was false, and you just helped prove it
Suggesting that the whole Moderation team is biased against 63e members is ridicious.Only ridiculous thing here is FSE Moderation.
Any grievances regarding teamspeak servers or in game servers are irrelevant to this forum. You can discuss them as much as you want, but they are beyond my powers to change or even influence them.
Suggesting that the whole Moderation team is biased in favour of 63e members is ridicious.Only ridiculous thing here is FSE Moderation.
Hm, how about the fact that I was muted a while back for quoting bean bean, who was in the 63e at the time, for quoting out of context with the intent to make the user look bad. Yet, high and mighty squirts is doing that right now, quoting and altering something I saiddefinitely not 63e biased moderation m8
I feel that if certain people want the hate to stop than in fact there should be a look at polices in place with regards to servers. I get it and I know its private server but to be 100% honest with you the fact is people should be about supporting this community. To only consider one's own goals of becoming the biggest regiment in the game is quite frankly stupid because you will have no competition in this community at all.
On the flip side, trolling the group that owns the server will not do any good. Reasonable talks about possibly changing the rules will go much farther. What I mean by that is actually going in teamspeak and talking about the issues. I understand both sides and I can see how frustrating it would be and perhaps a possible rule could be 1 recruitment message per map. If that is too much to ask than shit on me but honestly I dont think its that big of a deal to allow 1 message per map.
Otherwise if you get a boner out of the hate and shit than fine continue on this path. I would like to see the community grow rather than slowly die away.
I feel that if certain people want the hate to stop than in fact there should be a look at polices in place with regards to servers. I get it and I know its private server but to be 100% honest with you the fact is people should be about supporting this community. To only consider one's own goals of becoming the biggest regiment in the game is quite frankly stupid because you will have no competition in this community at all.I have asked both the BBG and the 63e at one time or other to consider changing their policies, and they have refused
On the flip side, trolling the group that owns the server will not do any good. Reasonable talks about possibly changing the rules will go much farther. What I mean by that is actually going in teamspeak and talking about the issues. I understand both sides and I can see how frustrating it would be and perhaps a possible rule could be 1 recruitment message per map. If that is too much to ask than shit on me but honestly I dont think its that big of a deal to allow 1 message per map.
Otherwise if you get a boner out of the hate and shit than fine continue on this path. I would like to see the community grow rather than slowly die away.
Fucksake if you hate 63e Siege make your own server and spend time getting it populated like they did. 63e Siege didn't become the number one server on NA in a night. Pretty sure it's risen and died before now it's just staying up.I did, and I have tried, but it is impossible to compete with Karth telling all 100 of his kiddos to hop on siege after events, when I only have myself and a few friends to get on mine
Fucksake if you hate 63e Siege make your own server and spend time getting it populated like they did. 63e Siege didn't become the number one server on NA in a night. Pretty sure it's risen and died before now it's just staying up.
same was said about NA 1 when 27th had their siege just sayingggg. Look at NA 1 now xdededeFucksake if you hate 63e Siege make your own server and spend time getting it populated like they did. 63e Siege didn't become the number one server on NA in a night. Pretty sure it's risen and died before now it's just staying up.
Ha. Goodluck getting any pop from the 63e. Not only is it probs favorited by the pubs at this point, but you are never gonna be able to populate a server more than the 63e can due to their sheer size.
63e Siege is a problem. The main argument that people have for it is "It's a 63e server, paid for by the 63e, so 63e rules", which while true, doesn't make it less of a problem for the community.
Also please, do continue discussion here. I'm listening. Don't mind all the nay-sayers, my ears are wide open.
Fucksake if you hate 63e Siege make your own server and spend time getting it populated like they did. 63e Siege didn't become the number one server on NA in a night. Pretty sure it's risen and died before now it's just staying up.
Ha. Goodluck getting any pop from the 63e. Not only is it probs favorited by the pubs at this point, but you are never gonna be able to populate a server more than the 63e can due to their sheer size.
63e Siege is a problem. The main argument that people have for it is "It's a 63e server, paid for by the 63e, so 63e rules", which while true, doesn't make it less of a problem for the community.
Also please, do continue discussion here. I'm listening. Don't mind all the nay-sayers, my ears are wide open.
lol the blatant ignoranceFucksake if you hate 63e Siege make your own server and spend time getting it populated like they did. 63e Siege didn't become the number one server on NA in a night. Pretty sure it's risen and died before now it's just staying up.
Ha. Goodluck getting any pop from the 63e. Not only is it probs favorited by the pubs at this point, but you are never gonna be able to populate a server more than the 63e can due to their sheer size.
63e Siege is a problem. The main argument that people have for it is "It's a 63e server, paid for by the 63e, so 63e rules", which while true, doesn't make it less of a problem for the community.
Also please, do continue discussion here. I'm listening. Don't mind all the nay-sayers, my ears are wide open.
Your point has already been debunked. I believe it was Siwi who made a Siege server during our "reign" and banned only 63e and BBG from recruiting. For a while, it actually got a lot more than the 63e ever did because the 63e Siege was dead for 3+ months, but we didn't say anything because at the end of the day Siwi's server was his server and the 63e wasn't focusing on using our time to recruit, so therefore we hurt for our lack of work towards the server. It was a fun server to go to as well, but for some reason Siwi ended up not continuing the server and he shut it down. Yet, during the months the 63e siege was down, you didn't see an increase in other regiments numbers or anything change for that matter. Just nothing happened for the most part. So, that's actual proof that our server literally does nothing to harm the community.
Fucksake if you hate 63e Siege make your own server and spend time getting it populated like they did. 63e Siege didn't become the number one server on NA in a night. Pretty sure it's risen and died before now it's just staying up.
Ha. Goodluck getting any pop from the 63e. Not only is it probs favorited by the pubs at this point, but you are never gonna be able to populate a server more than the 63e can due to their sheer size.
63e Siege is a problem. The main argument that people have for it is "It's a 63e server, paid for by the 63e, so 63e rules", which while true, doesn't make it less of a problem for the community.
Also please, do continue discussion here. I'm listening. Don't mind all the nay-sayers, my ears are wide open.
Your point has already been debunked. I believe it was Siwi who made a Siege server during our "reign" and banned only 63e and BBG from recruiting. For a while, it actually got a lot more than the 63e ever did because the 63e Siege was dead for 3+ months, but we didn't say anything because at the end of the day Siwi's server was his server and the 63e wasn't focusing on using our time to recruit, so therefore we hurt for our lack of work towards the server. It was a fun server to go to as well, but for some reason Siwi ended up not continuing the server and he shut it down. Yet, during the months the 63e siege was down, you didn't see an increase in other regiments numbers or anything change for that matter. Just nothing happened for the most part. So, that's actual proof that our server literally does nothing to harm the community.
Going away from the previous narrative, is there a way we can perhaps see some more support go towards the Thursday Public LB hosted on NA1 every Thursday, I know a good number of regiments continue to show their support of Pubs participating with their regiment and giving them an opportunity to experience organized regiment play. I know when I go there with my Cavalry, I try to get my guys to be as accepting as possible to the pubs that come to cav with us, cause most of them are just cool down to earth pubs most of the time. So if possible, we can try to get more regiment rallying around the event, also a good chance for the smaller regiments who aren't familiar with the event to get their names out there. Other than the Pub LB, nothing else is done out in the open for the most part, any suggestions on perhaps doing something more open for people that are more on hands in-game and don't spend time on the forums?
The point of this thread is identifying problems in the community and solving them.
The problem:
Monopoly of recruitment on major servers leads to a spiraling problem where large regiments get larger and smaller regiments risk disbanding and leaving the community.
Now, if people feel that 63e Siege is part of the problem then they are free to discuss why on this thread. I will listen. If people feel that it's not a problem, they are free to state why. I will listen. I will take a side as needed and we will find a solution. That's how it works.
The point of this thread is identifying problems in the community and solving them.
The problem:
Monopoly of recruitment on major servers leads to a spiraling problem where large regiments get larger and smaller regiments risk disbanding and leaving the community.
Now, if people feel that 63e Siege is part of the problem then they are free to discuss why on this thread. I will listen. If people feel that it's not a problem, they are free to state why. I will listen. I will take a side as needed and we will find a solution. That's how it works.
Your solution includes going into a privately owned server and forcing change. In other words, never going to be a real solution because it's privately owned. They can discuss it, but talking about a broken leak opposed to going out and just fixing the leak yourself are very different.
Also, again, not a monopoly. Monopoly would mean the servers actively take action to stop others from coming into the market via sabotage, bribes, etc. Things that are unethical. Only thing that 63e Siege has done is kept being a server. So again, there is no monopoly, there is only the inability of others.
Feel free to do option 2 cause option 1 isn't a well thought out or fair approach.HEARD IT HERE FIRST! 63e DECLARES WAR ON NW COMMUNITY!!!!!!!!111112122222
Option 2 is probably an option that makes sense, but my entire point is no one ever puts the time to do that other than when Siwi had his up. Also, when you say we complain when we get pressured, it's more so I complain about it when people complain that the 63e isn't open to people and I bring up the fact is because the narrative always ends up one of bullying/harassment, hence why we try not to open our community to the outside 1v1/competitive/veteran community.
But yeah, Ap0c your second option sounds like a good option, have people from all around the community actually take their time for a community siege server and then populate it as a community. Don't see a problem with that, sounds great actually.
Feel free to do option 2 cause option 1 isn't a well thought out or fair approach.
Option 2 is probably an option that makes sense, but my entire point is no one ever puts the time to do that other than when Siwi had his up. Also, when you say we complain when we get pressured,it's more so I complain about it when people complain that the 63e isn't open to people and I bring up the fact is because the narrative always ends up one of bullying/harassment, hence why we try not to open our community to the outside 1v1/competitive/veteran community.
But yeah, Ap0c your second option sounds like a good option, have people from all around the community actually take their time for a community siege server and then populate it as a community. Don't see a problem with that, sounds great actually.
(https://i.gyazo.com/72664fe9d4aa0e973295c7ce83c02113.png)Feel free to do option 2 cause option 1 isn't a well thought out or fair approach.
Option 2 is probably an option that makes sense, but my entire point is no one ever puts the time to do that other than when Siwi had his up. Also, when you say we complain when we get pressured,it's more so I complain about it when people complain that the 63e isn't open to people and I bring up the fact is because the narrative always ends up one of bullying/harassment, hence why we try not to open our community to the outside 1v1/competitive/veteran community.
But yeah, Ap0c your second option sounds like a good option, have people from all around the community actually take their time for a community siege server and then populate it as a community. Don't see a problem with that, sounds great actually.
Take a moment to consider why: People don't dislike the 63e without reason, and many have said exactly why they dislike the 63e on this thread. It seems to me that the 63e aren't taking these grievances very seriously, and have just taken a "Hate us cuz they aint us" attitude towards the community, which is honestly pretty disappointing to me.
As for option 2, the problem with it is that it is neigh impossible to compete with 63e siege without concentrated effort from alot of the community for months and months, and even then it is doubtful they could pull the pubs away from 63e Siege. Not only that, but you are basically asking of other regiments what you have said is unreasonable to demand from the 63e: A privately owned server opening up recruitment to other regiments. Option 1 is far more reasonable I would say, and Option 2 should only be used as a last resort.
Nicely worded +1Feel free to do option 2 cause option 1 isn't a well thought out or fair approach.
Option 2 is probably an option that makes sense, but my entire point is no one ever puts the time to do that other than when Siwi had his up. Also, when you say we complain when we get pressured,it's more so I complain about it when people complain that the 63e isn't open to people and I bring up the fact is because the narrative always ends up one of bullying/harassment, hence why we try not to open our community to the outside 1v1/competitive/veteran community.
But yeah, Ap0c your second option sounds like a good option, have people from all around the community actually take their time for a community siege server and then populate it as a community. Don't see a problem with that, sounds great actually.
Take a moment to consider why: People don't dislike the 63e without reason, and many have said exactly why they dislike the 63e on this thread. It seems to me that the 63e aren't taking these grievances very seriously, and have just taken a "Hate us cuz they aint us" attitude towards the community, which is honestly pretty disappointing to me.
As for option 2, the problem with it is that it is neigh impossible to compete with 63e siege without concentrated effort from alot of the community for months and months, and even then it is doubtful they could pull the pubs away from 63e Siege. Not only that, but you are basically asking of other regiments what you have said is unreasonable to demand from the 63e: A privately owned server opening up recruitment to other regiments. Option 1 is far more reasonable I would say, and Option 2 should only be used as a last resort.
Feel free to do option 2 cause option 1 isn't a well thought out or fair approach.
Option 2 is probably an option that makes sense, but my entire point is no one ever puts the time to do that other than when Siwi had his up. Also, when you say we complain when we get pressured,it's more so I complain about it when people complain that the 63e isn't open to people and I bring up the fact is because the narrative always ends up one of bullying/harassment, hence why we try not to open our community to the outside 1v1/competitive/veteran community.
But yeah, Ap0c your second option sounds like a good option, have people from all around the community actually take their time for a community siege server and then populate it as a community. Don't see a problem with that, sounds great actually.
Take a moment to consider why: People don't dislike the 63e without reason, and many have said exactly why they dislike the 63e on this thread. It seems to me that the 63e aren't taking these grievances very seriously, and have just taken a "Hate us cuz they aint us" attitude towards the community, which is honestly pretty disappointing to me.
As for option 2, the problem with it is that it is neigh impossible to compete with 63e siege without concentrated effort from alot of the community for months and months, and even then it is doubtful they could pull the pubs away from 63e Siege. Not only that, but you are basically asking of other regiments what you have said is unreasonable to demand from the 63e: A privately owned server opening up recruitment to other regiments. Option 1 is far more reasonable I would say, and Option 2 should only be used as a last resort.
it is neigh impossible to compete with 63e siege without concentrated effort from alot of the community for months and months
Not only that, but you are basically asking of other regiments what you have said is unreasonable to demand from the 63e: A privately owned server opening up recruitment to other regiments.
wtf are you on?? 71st only brings like 15 Lol and they only have 43 in their steam group LolFeel free to do option 2 cause option 1 isn't a well thought out or fair approach.
Option 2 is probably an option that makes sense, but my entire point is no one ever puts the time to do that other than when Siwi had his up. Also, when you say we complain when we get pressured,it's more so I complain about it when people complain that the 63e isn't open to people and I bring up the fact is because the narrative always ends up one of bullying/harassment, hence why we try not to open our community to the outside 1v1/competitive/veteran community.
But yeah, Ap0c your second option sounds like a good option, have people from all around the community actually take their time for a community siege server and then populate it as a community. Don't see a problem with that, sounds great actually.
Take a moment to consider why: People don't dislike the 63e without reason, and many have said exactly why they dislike the 63e on this thread. It seems to me that the 63e aren't taking these grievances very seriously, and have just taken a "Hate us cuz they aint us" attitude towards the community, which is honestly pretty disappointing to me.
As for option 2, the problem with it is that it is neigh impossible to compete with 63e siege without concentrated effort from alot of the community for months and months, and even then it is doubtful they could pull the pubs away from 63e Siege. Not only that, but you are basically asking of other regiments what you have said is unreasonable to demand from the 63e: A privately owned server opening up recruitment to other regiments. Option 1 is far more reasonable I would say, and Option 2 should only be used as a last resort.
Quoteit is neigh impossible to compete with 63e siege without concentrated effort from alot of the community for months and months
Firstly, we could care less who hates us. We aren't going to control that because we can't. Also, there's a lot of parties who have already spoken that showed they "don't care." Stop playing the victim of not taking the matter seriously when others are doing it, and only framing one group for it. But to the main point, How is option 2 impossible? If 63e Siege's success is accomplished through the concentrated effort from our NCOs and members, why can't Community Siege prosper with members of the community putting in the same amount of work? Why put in the work when we can just convince a private owner to open his server for us, and we just leech of the work they put in? You have to listen to your proposal. It involves the private owners who have put in the work to create it to what it is now, to just let anyone sit on the back of that work. No, go out yourself and work for it yourself. Plus, it has only gotten big because no one tried to run a siege server as long as we have. Of course the thing that is there for the longest and does it more efficiently is going to do better, compare this situation to the production market. If a product is the only product of its kind for the longest, it is bound to succeed.
You can see it anywhere, the USMC decided not to sit around and they went from being a small time regiment to pretty much competing with the 63e in numbers. What did they do? They made a server that really was unique, offered slots that fit their needs, and then had their guys put in the work. Do the same for the Community Server. At this point it just sounds like the unwillingness to put in the time and effort to do something good, but just to point a finger.QuoteNot only that, but you are basically asking of other regiments what you have said is unreasonable to demand from the 63e: A privately owned server opening up recruitment to other regiments.
Not really, the 63e Siege is aimed for the 63e. When you suggest a community siege, it's more aimed for the community so you can't compare a privately owned server to a server aimed to adhering to the community. Also, isn't this where the criticism of the siege is coming from, right? Not from a few individuals who over time have disliked the 63e, but actual regiment leaders? Otherwise there's nothing to talk about here if no actual regiments that participate in the open community don't speak up about it. So far the only current regiment leader to bring anything up is cheesypants, and his regiment has 60-100 active members. So where are the regiment leaders you speak of that say their regiments have failed do to the server. At this point it's a claim made by non-regiment leaders and more so people who have been in the community/browse the forums.
The 71st (Highland) Regiment of Foot is a Mount & Blade: Napoleonic Wars regiment dedicated to creating lasting friendships, enjoying weekly events, and accurately representing military structure, command, and tactics -- all the while making sure our members are disciplined and able to follow orders to-the-letter. We have an active roster of approximately 60 men, around 100 in total.
According to their pageRight above that is the avatar of their steam group clearly showing that they have 43 people in it. Your attention to detail is seriously lacking.QuoteThe 71st (Highland) Regiment of Foot is a Mount & Blade: Napoleonic Wars regiment dedicated to creating lasting friendships, enjoying weekly events, and accurately representing military structure, command, and tactics -- all the while making sure our members are disciplined and able to follow orders to-the-letter. We have an active roster of approximately 60 men, around 100 in total.
I just took that as their official number count, if so then they've mistakenly put on their page that they have 60-100 active men.
wait what. It states 60-100 men right there. LOLretard? hello? hello?
Obviously they have not updated it lol
Don't pick and choose information. It's common sense.
Last night I talked extensively with Immath and Dodge the leader of the 9te and the 23rd infact dodge helped me write my paragraph. He is not the leader of one of the regiments that you named and his regiment does participate in large 200 man events such as thunderstormers. I guess that means they are real community regiment??Obviously they have not updated it lol
Don't pick and choose information. It's common sense.
I can't distinguish that from their page, but stop trying to take the topic off to a different narrative and remain to the one at hand.
Whether they have X active members or Y active members, whichever they claim they have, the point is he's the only actual individual from a regimental standpoint who's posted about anything. But still, the only regiments who have a voice that will complain will be like.. 58e, 3eVolt remnants, 71st, and that's about it. So like, definitely not the bulk of anyone new, more so a bulk of those regiments have elements that heavily dislike the 63e. So is the whole of the community actually being represented or just the side that is apparent on the forums/just are anti-63e.
Firstly, we could care less who hates us. We aren't going to control that because we can't
How is option 2 impossible? If 63e Siege's success is accomplished through the concentrated effort from our NCOs and members, why can't Community Siege prosper with members of the community putting in the same amount of work?
Why put in the work when we can just convince a private owner to open his server for us, and we just leech of the work they put in? You have to listen to your proposal. It involves the private owners who have put in the work to create it to what it is now, to just let anyone sit on the back of that work. No, go out yourself and work for it yourself.
Not really, the 63e Siege is aimed for the 63e. When you suggest a community siege, it's more aimed for the community so you can't compare a privately owned server to a server aimed to adhering to the community. Also, isn't this where the criticism of the siege is coming from, right? Not from a few individuals who over time have disliked the 63e, but actual regiment leaders? Otherwise there's nothing to talk about here if no actual regiments that participate in the open community don't speak up about it. So far the only current regiment leader to bring anything up is cheesypants, and his regiment has 60-100 active members. So where are the regiment leaders you speak of that say their regiments have failed do to the server. At this point it's a claim made by non-regiment leaders and more so people who have been in the community/browse the forums.
I was not changing the subject. I was simply informing you of what was wrong with your thought process. As for me I just want a 1v1 or something but the 63e constantly challenges regiments such as the 23rd and the AEF. Regiments such as the 1er, 71st and 45e strive off of competitive play. Give or take a few public events spread throughout the week. Plus the 63e made the claim "Stick around for a while and then we will 1v1 you". However, when I brought up the issue with Cheesy never receiving a response for his requests, the subject was changed? How come? You're the largest regiment currently in NA yet you refuse to compete against other regiments competitively. It's been 4 months since the 63e has played against a top contending regiment. At this point it isn't about rebuilding. It's about saving face and the fear of being beat. Every regiment gets beat every now and then. Deal with it. It's part of competitive play.Obviously they have not updated it lol
Don't pick and choose information. It's common sense.
I can't distinguish that from their page, but stop trying to take the topic off to a different narrative and remain to the one at hand.
Whether they have X active members or Y active members, whichever they claim they have, the point is he's the only actual individual who's posted about anything. But still, the only regiments who have a voice that will complain will be like.. 58e, 3eVolt remnants, 71st, and that's about it. So like, definitely not the bulk of anyone new, more so a bulk of those regiments have elements that heavily dislike the 63e. So is the whole of the community actually being represented or just the side that is apparent on the forums/just are anti-63e.
I was not changing the subject. I was simply informing you of what was wrong with your thought process. As for me I just want a 1v1 or something but the 63e constantly challenges regiments such as the 23rd and the AEF. Regiments such as the 1er, 71st and 45e strive off of competitive play. Give or take a few public events spread throughout the week. Plus the 63e made the claim "Stick around for a while and then we will 1v1 you". However, when I brought up the issue with Cheesy never receiving a response for his requests, the subject was changed? How come? You're the largest regiment currently in NA yet you refuse to compete against other regiments competitively. It's been 4 months since the 63e has played against a top contending regiment. At this point it isn't about rebuilding. It's about saving face and the fear of being beat. Every regiment gets beat every now and then. Deal with it. It's part of competitive play.Obviously they have not updated it lol
Don't pick and choose information. It's common sense.
I can't distinguish that from their page, but stop trying to take the topic off to a different narrative and remain to the one at hand.
Whether they have X active members or Y active members, whichever they claim they have, the point is he's the only actual individual who's posted about anything. But still, the only regiments who have a voice that will complain will be like.. 58e, 3eVolt remnants, 71st, and that's about it. So like, definitely not the bulk of anyone new, more so a bulk of those regiments have elements that heavily dislike the 63e. So is the whole of the community actually being represented or just the side that is apparent on the forums/just are anti-63e.
Squirts you're going full defense mode. Like a chihuahua backed into a corner...Asian has said this before, but the 1er and 71st are in full agreement on this.
Don't tell me that I am acting as a child. You're a hypocrite and far worse than I am. What I am simply trying to put out there is that the largest regiment possibly in the game currently is not adding to the competitive pool. A reason for alot of people leaving the game and losing interest is either
1) They realize the game isn't for them anymore and move on.
2) Never have events (especially 1v1's). These types of events are what people enjoy the most from what I have seen.
Regiments sometimes also depend solely on 1v1's because most events are not run well. However, I did enjoy bean's event last night. Refusing to 1v1 people, especially regiments you know love to 1v1 and depend on 1v1's shows that you don't care about the community or the regiments that want to do so.
Also when I started losing I didn't stop challenging regiments. I continued until we would win and still challenge all the regiments I can find.
Squirts you're going full defense mode. Like a chihuahua backed into a corner...
Don't tell me that I am acting as a child. You're a hypocrite and far worse than I am. What I am simply trying to put out there is that the largest regiment possibly in the game currently is not adding to the competitive pool. A reason for alot of people leaving the game and losing interest is either
1) They realize the game isn't for them anymore and move on.
2) Never have events (especially 1v1's). These types of events are what people enjoy the most from what I have seen.
Regiments sometimes also depend solely on 1v1's because most events are not run well. However, I did enjoy bean's event last night. Refusing to 1v1 people, especially regiments you know love to 1v1 and depend on 1v1's shows that you don't care about the community or the regiments that want to do so.
Refusing to 1v1 people, especially regiments you know love to 1v1 and depend on 1v1's shows that you don't care about the community or the regiments that want to do so.
What I am simply trying to put out there is that the largest regiment possibly in the game currently is not adding to the competitive pool. .... A reason for alot of people leaving the game and losing interest is either
1) They realize the game isn't for them anymore and move on.
2) Never have events (especially 1v1's). These types of events are what people enjoy the most from what I have seen.
The 63e is not the only regiment that is doing this (I can name quite a few). However seeing that you guys are the largest, it seems necessary to talk about this since the subject has come up.
The 63e is the worst offenders when it comes to selective 1v1's. Also, the issue on the 63e and the community has come up. Which is why we are talking about it. Its a constructive argument. Want to solve issues? Especially with the community? Then listen to what people are saying and stop ignoring us.
Asian and Theodin, I don't think he's even reading what you guys are saying.As expected. It's like talking to a brick wall :'(
At least the brick wall can't talk backAsian and Theodin, I don't think he's even reading what you guys are saying.As expected. It's like talking to a brick wall :'(Spoiler(https://pixabay.com/static/uploads/photo/2016/03/16/11/16/background-1260304_960_720.jpg)[close]
At least the brick wall can't talk backAsian and Theodin, I don't think he's even reading what you guys are saying.As expected. It's like talking to a brick wall :'(Spoiler(https://pixabay.com/static/uploads/photo/2016/03/16/11/16/background-1260304_960_720.jpg)[close]
Hey buddy stop going off-topic, pal.At least the brick wall can't talk backAsian and Theodin, I don't think he's even reading what you guys are saying.As expected. It's like talking to a brick wall :'(Spoiler(https://pixabay.com/static/uploads/photo/2016/03/16/11/16/background-1260304_960_720.jpg)[close]
Bravescot, aren't you the guy who copy and pastes boards on this forum and uses them for the War of Rights boards you moderate?
Squirts is so goddamn thick.not even the good kind of thicc, he's just thick.
He's doing more harm trying to defend the 63e than he is good.Squirts is so goddamn thick.not even the good kind of thicc, he's just thick.
I think it's right you discus both issue about NA community dying because of 63e monopoly and removal of Karth's admin powers on this thread. But you could also invite all NA regiments to conference (on ts, not 63e since half of people is banned lel) and sign some treaty. Like that servers either ban recruiting or allow it from everyone but host can have recruitment message when you connect to server. But I don't think there is much possibility of this happening since Karth is arrogant, selfish and power hungry, but here you go solution kids.
Srsly let's talk about Karth losing his Moderator.
They were sent to EU community representative by PM and are under investigation.I think it's right you discus both issue about NA community dying because of 63e monopoly and removal of Karth's admin powers on this thread. But you could also invite all NA regiments to conference (on ts, not 63e since half of people is banned lel) and sign some treaty. Like that servers either ban recruiting or allow it from everyone but host can have recruitment message when you connect to server. But I don't think there is much possibility of this happening since Karth is arrogant, selfish and power hungry, but here you go solution kids.
Srsly let's talk about Karth losing his Moderator.
You are going to have to cite SPECIFIC examples of his misconduct...
I think it's right you discus both issue about NA community dying because of 63e monopoly and removal of Karth's admin powers on this thread. But you could also invite all NA regiments to conference (on ts, not 63e since half of people is banned lel) and sign some treaty. Like that servers either ban recruiting or allow it from everyone but host can have recruitment message when you connect to server. But I don't think there is much possibility of this happening since Karth is arrogant, selfish and power hungry, but here you go solution kids.
Srsly let's talk about Karth losing his Moderator.
You are going to have to cite SPECIFIC examples of his misconduct...
You are saying BabyJesus ban was warranted, officially "spamming"?I think it's right you discus both issue about NA community dying because of 63e monopoly and removal of Karth's admin powers on this thread. But you could also invite all NA regiments to conference (on ts, not 63e since half of people is banned lel) and sign some treaty. Like that servers either ban recruiting or allow it from everyone but host can have recruitment message when you connect to server. But I don't think there is much possibility of this happening since Karth is arrogant, selfish and power hungry, but here you go solution kids.
Srsly let's talk about Karth losing his Moderator.
You are going to have to cite SPECIFIC examples of his misconduct...
As it stands right now, I am more concerned with changes in forum policy/rules and solving some community issues rather than going man to man with moderators. Karth technically has done nothing wrong, and the punishments he has given out have been justified by the rules, however unpopular they may be. However, if you guys bring me some examples, id be more than willing to chase down Duuring and yell at him for you guys.
No, I disagreed heavily with the ban. I even convinced Mack to post about it.So question for Duuring who asked for BabyJesus ban? It was Karth.
However, bans are Duurings thing, not Karth.
The way the ban process works is a "ban thread" is posted on the mod board, mods go +1 or -1 it and give their reasons, and Duuring considers all their opinions and decides if they are banned or not.
You do realize I can't ban anyone? Duuring the senior mod who has the permissions to actually ban people from the forum, and everything I do is by the rules otherwise I ask another mod to look into it if I am unsure. So I have no idea what you are accusing me of. As for everything else community related, lol, if you actually want to talk about the actual reasons which you are accusing me off then do it over a PM with me.
I could go screenshot it for you Theo/BabyJs ban thread for you.
Not sure if thats allowed or not though.
Are you aware that the position of Community Representative is one of trust and confidence, and do you understand you can be punished for breaking that trust? :
edit, and yes, NA1 pub lb is still going. The attendance is lower thanks to school and other stuff. Several regiments want to come but cant sadly as they cant get enough people on. perhaps in a few weeks when things calm down the regiments will be able to get a full attendance again.
Thats exactly why I didn't go ahead and do it.Theres some tension in my underpants right now
Went back and read the rules and I saw that conversations on that board are to remain private, but I will ask Duuring for permission later as there is alot of community tension right now and circumstances are abit special.
Saying Karth had nothing to do with BabyJesus ban is absurd. He asked for it since he was shitting on his threads.
Well Duuring is bad Head Moderator as well, a liar.Saying Karth had nothing to do with BabyJesus ban is absurd. He asked for it since he was shitting on his threads.
Im not saying Karth had nothing to do with it.
You can get mad at Karth for it.
But dont think he overstepped his bounds and will get mod removed. At the end of the day, Duuring takes responsibility for bans.
Honestly, it's not overstepping his bounds that's the problem, it's where the bounds are in the first place. But I honestly think, Apoc, you should orginize a community meeting about the 63e problem, since people who are never on the same side are on the same side in this case.
Honestly, it's not overstepping his bounds that's the problem, it's where the bounds are in the first place. But I honestly think, Apoc, you should orginize a community meeting about the 63e problem, since people who are never on the same side are on the same side in this case.
i don't see one regiment rep on here from the 3 200 man line battle events we host each week complaining. We interact with more regiments than any other, you may not know there names but they do exist, and my guys go to other events as well. All I see are people who I personally have had conflicts with, or punished via the forum for braking the rules, and their followers. So if that is what you call the community then you are clearly mistaken, and it's a good thing I don't tell all my NCOs or officers to see this forum as then the flaming and insults on here would be x100.you guys got shirts? where the fuck can I buy one?????
If you have an actual suggestion or need advice on how to recruit then feel free to ask. It's not like we have a '63e' privilege but I do not consider 63e just a regiment but it's own gaming community as well, and if people are mad at the fact we have people who are diehard 63e fans, or people who will actually buy and wear a 63e shirt then that's not something I'm going to stop. An open conversation or suggestion that actually has some substance I'll listen and respond to
Honestly, it's not overstepping his bounds that's the problem, it's where the bounds are in the first place. But I honestly think, Apoc, you should orginize a community meeting about the 63e problem, since people who are never on the same side are on the same side in this case.
As it stands right now, I am more concerned with changes in forum policy/rules and solving some community issues rather than going man to man with moderators. Karth technically has done nothing wrong, and the punishments he has given out have been justified by the rules, however unpopular they may be. However, if you guys bring me some examples, id be more than willing to chase down Duuring and yell at him for you guys.
7-1post something on topic and useful or don't post here.
Don't offer Apoc, just do ityeah, it obviously needs to happen so lets get it going
Don't offer Apoc, just do ityeah, it obviously needs to happen so lets get it going
community reps arent allowed to have personal lives everyone knows thisDon't offer Apoc, just do ityeah, it obviously needs to happen so lets get it going
well considering ive been in class this whole conversation
can i get home first?
I attempted with Becker to form a community run set of servers, but no one was interested. I would be down to try again, I can rent a server/help set it up and all, but it would be up to everyone to get it populatedi think you chose the wrong person before. Choose the right one now. #GoApoc
Aight you trolls, 6 Est 1er TS you leaders. Be there or be square. We gonna talk some strats.can you post the ts?
Aight you trolls, 6 Est 1er TS you leaders. Be there or be square. We gonna talk some strats.Ill be there.
50.97.95.135:10457Aight you trolls, 6 Est 1er TS you leaders. Be there or be square. We gonna talk some strats.can you post the ts?
I can't get shit, I'm poor AF. But I do have some ideas I'd like to pass around to reg leaders tonight.No like get the FSE people 2 do it
I can't get shit, I'm poor AF. But I do have some ideas I'd like to pass around to reg leaders tonight.No like get the FSE people 2 do it
they won't do it. Battle cry of freedom is coming.I can't get shit, I'm poor AF. But I do have some ideas I'd like to pass around to reg leaders tonight.No like get the FSE people 2 do it
Aight you trolls, 6 Est 1er TS you leaders. Be there or be square. We gonna talk some strats.
I can't get shit, I'm poor AF. But I do have some ideas I'd like to pass around to reg leaders tonight.Reach into my pocket diddy
Siwi used to have a siege server. Really enjoyed it. Not sure what happened to it.People stopped playing it in favor of a shittier server with crappy rules
I think im more hated than Karth tbh but maybe thats just the north and south community getting to my head :P
I think im more hated than Karth tbh but maybe thats just the north and south community getting to my head :P
wat
Can't contain the moraine Apoc cant containI think im more hated than Karth tbh but maybe thats just the north and south community getting to my head :P
wat
I think im more hated than Karth tbh but maybe thats just the north and south community getting to my head :P
I think im more hated than Karth tbh but maybe thats just the north and south community getting to my head :P
who r u m8?
Can't contain the moraine Apoc cant containI think im more hated than Karth tbh but maybe thats just the north and south community getting to my head :P
wat
Thank you thank youCan't contain the moraine Apoc cant containI think im more hated than Karth tbh but maybe thats just the north and south community getting to my head :P
wat
BANNED
#63eTactics(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2016%2F01%2F05%2F12%2F2CFA746400000578-3385160-image-a-1_1451997502829.jpg&hash=4d1c57ef32b86392c312ccc9bc7a5f7a7cd34dcf)
Try to keep it serious.
As I've said before, do not expect any enforcement with regards to 63e Siege. You can continue discussing it until the end of days, but I personally don't see the point rather then getting yourself worked up.
Try to keep it serious.
As I've said before, do not expect any enforcement with regards to 63e Siege. You can continue discussing it until the end of days, but I personally don't see the point rather then getting yourself worked up.
Try to keep it serious.
As I've said before, do not expect any enforcement with regards to 63e Siege. You can continue discussing it until the end of days, but I personally don't see the point rather then getting yourself worked up.
Getting their rules changed iant the only possibility we are discussing though. However, it is definitely worth talking about because it would be the best way to solve the issue.
There isn't anything wrong with posting here but what Duuring is saying is that you shouldn't expect that you'll be successful because it's a privately owned server. The 63e don't have to do anything that they don't want to do.
Getting their rules changed iant the only possibility we are discussing though. However, it is definitely worth talking about because it would be the best way to solve the issue.
Does squirts even have a say about the server? Like even if squirts wanted to would he be able to change the server rules?
I think it's pretty safe to say that the 63e are not changing their stance on their server. It seems like the most appropriate action would be to explore other options (regarding the server), as been stated before.Just delete forum if there is nothing we can use it for cheese pizza fanboy
Unless Karth or another individual is able to make a decision on behalf of Karth, you all could chat offline (aka Steam or TS, etc) to get the best course of action.
I think it's pretty safe to say that the 63e are not changing their stance on their server. It seems like the most appropriate action would be to explore other options (regarding the server), as been stated before.No thanks. This forum was designed to be a community gathering space, where we could discuss things like this. If you want a forum filled with fairies and rainbows this isn't the place for you.
Unless Karth or another individual is able to make a decision on behalf of Karth, you all could chat offline (aka Steam or TS, etc) to get the best course of action.
I dont think telling the community to stop being so triggered is going to make people less triggered
actually I think its doing quite the opposite.
Getting their rules changed iant the only possibility we are discussing though. However, it is definitely worth talking about because it would be the best way to solve the issue.
I mean you would have to talk to the reasonable people in the community and not the trolls and people who dont even play the game that much about the issues. Just saying ::) To listen to the trolls who slam 63e would kinda be pointless since most of them dont even play the game that much. 8)
But than again.....where to find those people lol.
You guys are missing the connection here and mislabelling this. The reasons we stated are why we are slamming the 63e, not because of any special dislike. To tell you the truth I enjoyed being in the 63e, but the shit being pulled by the 63e is why I took that side. If solutions were proposed, debated, and then put in place, there wouldn't be any "hate" towards the 63e.
And you say it's irrational: it's completely rational to, as a community, announce displeasure towards the actions of a certain group.
the last time theodin posted constructive criticism of a 63e event he was banned off the forums :(You guys are missing the connection here and mislabelling this. The reasons we stated are why we are slamming the 63e, not because of any special dislike. To tell you the truth I enjoyed being in the 63e, but the shit being pulled by the 63e is why I took that side. If solutions were proposed, debated, and then put in place, there wouldn't be any "hate" towards the 63e.
And you say it's irrational: it's completely rational to, as a community, announce displeasure towards the actions of a certain group.
In all fairness I am not directing my previous reply to all who are opposed to the 63e or have brought up a concern they have about us. At the end of the day criticism, as long as it is constructive, is healthy and I welcome it. That being said certain individuals have posted here out of pure prejudice against the 63e, it is to those people that my previous reply was aimed. The people who have made genuinely valid points, I (and I'm sure other 63e officers) have read and thought about them seriously.
Which, coincidentally, is something that brought me into this whole argumentthe last time theodin posted constructive criticism of a 63e event he was banned off the forums :(You guys are missing the connection here and mislabelling this. The reasons we stated are why we are slamming the 63e, not because of any special dislike. To tell you the truth I enjoyed being in the 63e, but the shit being pulled by the 63e is why I took that side. If solutions were proposed, debated, and then put in place, there wouldn't be any "hate" towards the 63e.
And you say it's irrational: it's completely rational to, as a community, announce displeasure towards the actions of a certain group.
In all fairness I am not directing my previous reply to all who are opposed to the 63e or have brought up a concern they have about us. At the end of the day criticism, as long as it is constructive, is healthy and I welcome it. That being said certain individuals have posted here out of pure prejudice against the 63e, it is to those people that my previous reply was aimed. The people who have made genuinely valid points, I (and I'm sure other 63e officers) have read and thought about them seriously.
The sooner this whole movement is treated by the 63e as something other than mindless 63e hate, the sooner we can be constructive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_tradeThe sooner this whole movement is treated by the 63e as something other than mindless 63e hate, the sooner we can be constructive.
Movement. What. We're not trying to end 200 years of slavery here, we're talking about a game server.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_tradeThe sooner this whole movement is treated by the 63e as something other than mindless 63e hate, the sooner we can be constructive.
Movement. What. We're not trying to end 200 years of slavery here, we're talking about a game server.
fuck up my postWhat does that have to do with anything?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_tradeThe sooner this whole movement is treated by the 63e as something other than mindless 63e hate, the sooner we can be constructive.
Movement. What. We're not trying to end 200 years of slavery here, we're talking about a game server.
Ignore Russian, he is a very triggered conservative who worships the alternative media.mo·nop·o·ly
Movement doesn't have to be large scale. Do I have to pull up the dictionary on you again like I did for "monopoly"?
Ignore Russian, he is a very triggered conservative who worships the alternative media.mo·nop·o·ly
Movement doesn't have to be large scale. Do I have to pull up the dictionary on you again like I did for "monopoly"?
məˈnäpəlē/Submit
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply or trade in a commodity or service.
i agree with you russian. the 63e does treat teh community like their slaves or "proprerty"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_tradeThe sooner this whole movement is treated by the 63e as something other than mindless 63e hate, the sooner we can be constructive.
Movement. What. We're not trying to end 200 years of slavery here, we're talking about a game server.
The sooner this whole movement is treated by the 63e as something other than mindless 63e hate, the sooner we can be constructive.
I thought that we were a socialist society so we should all shareWhere is gluk so he tell us about his "perfect" socialist society. Cradle to grave baby. 8)
Ignore Russian, he is a very triggered conservative who worships the alternative media.mo·nop·o·ly
Movement doesn't have to be large scale. Do I have to pull up the dictionary on you again like I did for "monopoly"?
məˈnäpəlē/Submit
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply or trade in a commodity or service.
Exactly, making a siege server isn't exclusive nor has the 63e made it exclusive. In this case, the commodity being new players. Anyone is able to obtain new players; we have not done any single thing to make that exclusive.
cant even drive home without a page being added
all ill say is thisIgnore Russian, he is a very triggered conservative who worships the alternative media.mo·nop·o·ly
Movement doesn't have to be large scale. Do I have to pull up the dictionary on you again like I did for "monopoly"?
məˈnäpəlē/Submit
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply or trade in a commodity or service.
Exactly, making a siege server isn't exclusive nor has the 63e made it exclusive. In this case, the commodity being new players. Anyone is able to obtain new players; we have not done any single thing to make that exclusive.
wasn't the context i was using it in: another straw man
youd make a great farmer, crows would never bother ur fields
Stop using straw man arguments and taking things out of context and make an argument that will actually warrant a serious response.
Stop using straw man arguments and taking things out of context and make an argument that will actually warrant a serious response.
Once you show you're here as a CR Rep to represent both sides and not one, then perhaps a real discussion can be made.
Stop using straw man arguments and taking things out of context and make an argument that will actually warrant a serious response.
Once you show you're here as a CR Rep to represent both sides and not one, then perhaps a real discussion can be made.
Give me one example of bias.
Am I biased towards the 71st? the 45e? 1er? AEF?
Stop using straw man arguments and taking things out of context and make an argument that will actually warrant a serious response.
Once you show you're here as a CR Rep to represent both sides and not one, then perhaps a real discussion can be made.
Give me one example of bias.
Am I biased towards the 71st? the 45e? 1er? AEF?
Posts above is good enough, you consistently say to anyone 63e in this thread to take it serious, when you yourself and many others have been memeing/not responding with any serious intent on certain cases.
Lol anti-Karth, more like started by a bunch of salty ex-63e members who influenced a bunch of other bandwagoners, and now I get blamed for almost every single punishment given out of these forums. I am not complaining, but again just know this 'anti-Karth' stuff is full of nothing.
Tbh you have seemed pretty bias in this thread imo. Your job is not to lead one of the arguing sides but to bridge the gap between the two and to be the middleman for more productive conversations. Your job is to advocate for both sides and to help them come to a favourable consensus, not solely push what you believe to be right. You are a representative of ALL the community, including the 63e, not just yourself.
Tbh you have seemed pretty bias in this thread imo. Your job is not to lead one of the arguing sides but to bridge the gap between the two and to be the middleman for more productive conversations. Your job is to advocate for both sides and to help them come to a favourable consensus, not solely push what you believe to be right. You are a representative of ALL the community, including the 63e, not just yourself.
My job is to solve community issues and keep the mods informed of said issues. In certain circumstances, this may require me to take a stance on a particular issue, as I have done. The stance I was taking I did not see as anti-63e, but pro-community. It wouldn't kill them to lessen up the restrictions on recruitment on their server, but it would open up a huge server to recruitment from other regiments who are alot more desperate for recruits. But the 63e have made it very clear that all discussions about said solution are off the table, and that anyone who has a greivance against their regiment as a result of that or other past/current issues are just mindless haters. I find that stance abit immature and counterproductive, and I have voiced that opinion. Now according to them, I too am now a mindless, biased hater.
Tbh you have seemed pretty bias in this thread imo. Your job is not to lead one of the arguing sides but to bridge the gap between the two and to be the middleman for more productive conversations. Your job is to advocate for both sides and to help them come to a favourable consensus, not solely push what you believe to be right. You are a representative of ALL the community, including the 63e, not just yourself.
My job is to solve community issues and keep the mods informed of said issues. In certain circumstances, this may require me to take a stance on a particular issue, as I have done. The stance I was taking I did not see as anti-63e, but pro-community. It wouldn't kill them to lessen up the restrictions on recruitment on their server, but it would open up a huge server to recruitment from other regiments who are alot more desperate for recruits. But the 63e have made it very clear that all discussions about said solution are off the table, and that anyone who has a greivance against their regiment as a result of that or other past/current issues are just mindless haters. I find that stance abit immature and counterproductive, and I have voiced that opinion. Now according to them, I too am now a mindless, biased hater.
No one at any stage of this discussion called you a mindless hater.
you didnt use those words exactly but you yea you kinda didTbh you have seemed pretty bias in this thread imo. Your job is not to lead one of the arguing sides but to bridge the gap between the two and to be the middleman for more productive conversations. Your job is to advocate for both sides and to help them come to a favourable consensus, not solely push what you believe to be right. You are a representative of ALL the community, including the 63e, not just yourself.
My job is to solve community issues and keep the mods informed of said issues. In certain circumstances, this may require me to take a stance on a particular issue, as I have done. The stance I was taking I did not see as anti-63e, but pro-community. It wouldn't kill them to lessen up the restrictions on recruitment on their server, but it would open up a huge server to recruitment from other regiments who are alot more desperate for recruits. But the 63e have made it very clear that all discussions about said solution are off the table, and that anyone who has a greivance against their regiment as a result of that or other past/current issues are just mindless haters. I find that stance abit immature and counterproductive, and I have voiced that opinion. Now according to them, I too am now a mindless, biased hater.
No one at any stage of this discussion called you a mindless hater.
You guys are going in circles at this point. Nobody really wants to compromise at the end of the day.
If I were you APOC, I would forget about the 63e opening up their server to public recruitment and instead work with Siwi and others toward getting a community server(s) going. My advice would be to instead of putting all your eggs in one basket, diversify your portfolio. So have a zombie server, and TDM, CTF, etc. I wouldn't waste my time on siege since 63e has that locked down.
Can I just quickly ask. As Community Rep I understand you are trying to look out for the good of the community but aren't these thoughts about requesting rule changes of servers a bit far. The CR is meant to be for FSE and to make sure the management of events and regimental issues is dealt with.
I mean the way this is going about it seems like the CR (AC0P) feels they could come to any Event and Server and demand me to make change it's rules. Which is entirely wrong. How we run a Server or Event or something which is privately owned or managed by a regiment or person is their business. If it is Successful/Fails is under their hands not yours. I do understand why you may feel this server can be a problem for you to handle but it is out of your hands and jurisdiction. I also agree with Munj anyone can come and just use the same techniques we did with a Community Server or another privately owned server and maybe then you can counter act our server being a "problem".
Now I am one of the Head Admins with Karth and Nathan and I am keeping an eye on this thread. So if you wish try discuss what you want to see changed, carry on, seems you won't stop. But the likely hood that I will agree and want to take it up in discussion with the other Head Admins is unlikely but I am keeping up with this thread.
Can I just quickly ask. As Community Rep I understand you are trying to look out for the good of the community but aren't these thoughts about requesting rule changes of servers a bit far. The CR is meant to be for FSE and to make sure the management of events and regimental issues is dealt with.
I mean the way this is going about it seems like the CR (AC0P) feels they could come to any Event and Server and demand them to make changes to it's rules. Which is entirely wrong. How we run a Server or Event or something which is privately owned or managed by a regiment or person is their business. If it is Successful/Fails, this is under their heads not yours. I do understand why you may feel this server can be a problem for you to handle but it is out of your hands and jurisdiction. I also agree with Munj anyone can come and just use the same techniques we did with a Community Server or another privately owned server and maybe then you can counter act our server being a "problem".
Now I am one of the Head Admins with Karth and Nathan and I am keeping an eye on this thread. So if you wish try discuss what you want to see changed, carry on, seems you won't stop. But the likely hood that I will agree and want to take it up in discussion with the other Head Admins is unlikely but I am keeping up with this thread.
Can I just quickly ask. As Community Rep I understand you are trying to look out for the good of the community but aren't these thoughts about requesting rule changes of servers a bit far. The CR is meant to be for FSE and to make sure the management of events and regimental issues is dealt with.
I mean the way this is going about it seems like the CR (AC0P) feels they could come to any Event and Server and demand me to make change it's rules. Which is entirely wrong. How we run a Server or Event or something which is privately owned or managed by a regiment or person is their business. If it is Successful/Fails is under their hands not yours. I do understand why you may feel this server can be a problem for you to handle but it is out of your hands and jurisdiction. I also agree with Munj anyone can come and just use the same techniques we did with a Community Server or another privately owned server and maybe then you can counter act our server being a "problem".
Now I am one of the Head Admins with Karth and Nathan and I am keeping an eye on this thread. So if you wish try discuss what you want to see changed, carry on, seems you won't stop. But the likely hood that I will agree and want to take it up in discussion with the other Head Admins is unlikely but I am keeping up with this thread.
No, they or anyone else outside of those who own the server have the ability to change your server rules. They can, like anyone else can request they be changed. Their reasoning may be good or bad, Same for their intentions. You can run your server the way you deem fit. even if others think it is a good or bad way to go about it.
there is nothing with them requesting the rules be changed, They don't have the authority to change them.
that goes for any other server out there.
Not sure why you feel they cant request the rules be changed. You don't have to agree or follow through with their requests. As long as they do it in the proper place in a good manner, there is really nothing wrong with it.
Can I just quickly ask. As Community Rep I understand you are trying to look out for the good of the community but aren't these thoughts about requesting rule changes of servers a bit far. The CR is meant to be for FSE and to make sure the management of events and regimental issues is dealt with.
I mean the way this is going about it seems like the CR (AC0P) feels they could come to any Event and Server and demand them to make changes to it's rules. Which is entirely wrong. How we run a Server or Event or something which is privately owned or managed by a regiment or person is their business. If it is Successful/Fails, this is under their heads not yours. I do understand why you may feel this server can be a problem for you to handle but it is out of your hands and jurisdiction. I also agree with Munj anyone can come and just use the same techniques we did with a Community Server or another privately owned server and maybe then you can counter act our server being a "problem".
Now I am one of the Head Admins with Karth and Nathan and I am keeping an eye on this thread. So if you wish try discuss what you want to see changed, carry on, seems you won't stop. But the likely hood that I will agree and want to take it up in discussion with the other Head Admins is unlikely but I am keeping up with this thread.
At no point in this conversation did Ap0c "demand" anything.
Come back when yall take this seriously and you dont feel like posting a bunch of straw men
You do realise that we (I.e. Squirts, Karth and myself) could've completely ignored this thread the moment it turned the way it did, but we didn't. It is you coming to us, not the other way round.
Your CRship does not give you say or power over a regiment, nor does the say of anyone who has commented on this thread so far.
Your prerogative only extends as far as the NW section of FSE, so don't delude yourself and other people that you can subject us or any other regiment/individuals to your will.
I am not saying that we are never willing to come to negotiation, but certainly not with you or anyone else here (with an assumed couple of exceptions), who have shown complete predujice towards the 63e though this thread.
Wouldn't it be worse for the 63e if another server popped up as opposed to allowing one recruitment message per map?You would think. Instead they will bring it on themselves
*Assuming the new server stays populated
#DoublePostChamp
Wouldn't it be worse for the 63e if another server popped up as opposed to allowing one recruitment message per map?You would think. Instead they will bring it on themselves
*Assuming the new server stays populated
#DoublePostChamp
I think it's been made pretty clear by 3-4 reps that we are not changing the rules we have had on the server for over 2 years. However if you would like some advice or wish to talk about anything else feel free, but in regards to specifically changing our server rules that's not happening (and no point in continuing to ask for that).
I think it's been made pretty clear by 3-4 reps that we are not changing the rules we have had on the server for over 2 years. However if you would like some advice or wish to talk about anything else feel free, but in regards to specifically changing our server rules that's not happening (and no point in continuing to ask for that).Now we see which side is not willing to compromise.
I think it's been made pretty clear by 3-4 reps that we are not changing the rules we have had on the server for over 2 years. However if you would like some advice or wish to talk about anything else feel free, but in regards to specifically changing our server rules that's not happening (and no point in continuing to ask for that).Now we see which side is not willing to compromise.
Now that we are past this topic let's talk about Karth's work as moderator.
My work as a moderator? what?...I think it's been made pretty clear by 3-4 reps that we are not changing the rules we have had on the server for over 2 years. However if you would like some advice or wish to talk about anything else feel free, but in regards to specifically changing our server rules that's not happening (and no point in continuing to ask for that).Now we see which side is not willing to compromise.
Now that we are past this topic let's talk about Karth's work as moderator.
Come on guys lets go boycott the server! I bet that will work just like it did on the 15ths humans vs bots! Now we just need gluk to organize it!
Well anyways thanks the response Karth
it would be like 5 regiments that bring about 20 people to each lb. 5x20=100 peopleCome on guys lets go boycott the server! I bet that will work just like it did on the 15ths humans vs bots! Now we just need gluk to organize it!
Well anyways thanks the response Karth
yeah go on then, all 5 of you, go and boycott the server 8).
subbed
What a nasty trollsubbed
you are
so incredibly late
now you are BANNED for being a nasty troll
subbed
you are
so incredibly late
now you are BANNED for being a nasty troll
Did Shadow just snip Duuring? Damnnnnnnnnno.
Aw. RipDid Shadow just snip Duuring? Damnnnnnnnnno.
I cum from the land of the free where we have this thing called freedom of speech. Something you damn commie euros wouldn't know
I really don't care who you are, as long as you plan to be constructive. Just wanna have a chat and see what peoples thoughts are pertaining to the community.+1
Just add me and I will pass out the teamspeak later. Might have a serious chat, might just ask sugar daddy Siwi to get his server rolling and we just throw a party there, might do both, who knows.
Was anything agreed upon/talked about?
Was anything agreed upon/talked about?
We getting a server.
Was anything agreed upon/talked about?The 63e has allowed others to recruit on their server but in exchange everyone joined the 63e /s
Are all NA regiments welcome to attend? Cos I'm the leader of the USAAJCR regimentif u kid feel like being up at 6 EST ok
Was anything agreed upon/talked about?
We getting a server.
Nice
Make sure it has enough dedodated wam.
Make sure it has enough dedodated wam.You've received a warning from the meme police for
Let us attack religions!
We just lost Peppers and Cheesy for no reason other than meming on a hateful religion and Peppers was barely even meming to begin with.Which is hateful religion apart from Judaism?
You can't speak a word of ill about Islam on this forum.
That and insulting the Dutch. I got warned for calling someone a "Nethercuck". Who could possibly be enforcing this censorship, I wonder???
I can guess.
You can't speak a word of ill about Islam on this forum.
That and insulting the Dutch. I got warned for calling someone a "Nethercuck". Who could possibly be enforcing this censorship, I wonder???
I can guess.
How about you, peppers, and the 71st go make an alt right/right wing thread on the off topic board? Im sure you could get away with it alot more there.
He's got you thereYou can't speak a word of ill about Islam on this forum.
That and insulting the Dutch. I got warned for calling someone a "Nethercuck". Who could possibly be enforcing this censorship, I wonder???
I can guess.
How about you, peppers, and the 71st go make an alt right/right wing thread on the off topic board? Im sure you could get away with it alot more there.
psst
I'd bet you 6 gorillion shekels we couldn't
You guys are missing the connection here and mislabelling this. The reasons we stated are why we are slamming the 63e, not because of any special dislike. To tell you the truth I enjoyed being in the 63e, but the shit being pulled by the 63e is why I took that side. If solutions were proposed, debated, and then put in place, there wouldn't be any "hate" towards the 63e.
And you say it's irrational: it's completely rational to, as a community, announce displeasure towards the actions of a certain group.
In all fairness I am not directing my previous reply to all who are opposed to the 63e or have brought up a concern they have about us. At the end of the day criticism, as long as it is constructive, is healthy and I welcome it. That being said certain individuals have posted here out of pure prejudice against the 63e, it is to those people that my previous reply was aimed. The people who have made genuinely valid points, I (and I'm sure other 63e officers) have read and thought about them seriously.
So can the 71st thread be unlocked? I have some sick new screenshots to post!
You guys are missing the connection here and mislabelling this. The reasons we stated are why we are slamming the 63e, not because of any special dislike. To tell you the truth I enjoyed being in the 63e, but the shit being pulled by the 63e is why I took that side. If solutions were proposed, debated, and then put in place, there wouldn't be any "hate" towards the 63e.
And you say it's irrational: it's completely rational to, as a community, announce displeasure towards the actions of a certain group.
In all fairness I am not directing my previous reply to all who are opposed to the 63e or have brought up a concern they have about us. At the end of the day criticism, as long as it is constructive, is healthy and I welcome it. That being said certain individuals have posted here out of pure prejudice against the 63e, it is to those people that my previous reply was aimed. The people who have made genuinely valid points, I (and I'm sure other 63e officers) have read and thought about them seriously.
Hmmm, I did that before in July in response to your thread, after the 63e decided to make a version of an event that was being formed by other members of the community. In fact, Munj, I believe you were the OP.
(https://i.imgur.com/S7lOBwY.png)
and that got deleted.
This post in response to it (made by General Squirts), is still up at this moment:
(https://i.gyazo.com/47472c6809f468ed69cb188ed3f0b62e.png)
on this thread:
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=32174.1269
Btw, I stopped reading after MunJ's post. I assume it was just a collection of stupid memes that totally undermined the point you guys were originally trying to make.
*Pure evidence of 100% bias emerges*
Will action be taken this time doe?
No, I reported on the other threads like the 71st,3e, and 58e threads. (also the 63e one :)) )*Pure evidence of 100% bias emerges*
Will action be taken this time doe?
To be fair, Mack's post that was deleted was on the event's thread.
Squirts post was on the NaCl thread (Though, I think I saw it on other threads as well, think it was on the 71st's thread but I think squirts later edited it out).
It isn't moderation bias, but it is a lack of willingness to compromise/negotiate with the community.
*Pure evidence of 100% bias emerges*
Will action be taken this time doe?
To be fair, Mack's post that was deleted was on the event's thread.
Squirts post was on the NaCl thread (Though, I think I saw it on other threads as well, think it was on the 71st's thread but I think squirts later edited it out).
It isn't moderation bias, but it is a lack of willingness to compromise/negotiate with the community.
Spoiler*Pure evidence of 100% bias emerges*
Will action be taken this time doe?
To be fair, Mack's post that was deleted was on the event's thread.
Squirts post was on the NaCl thread (Though, I think I saw it on other threads as well, think it was on the 71st's thread but I think squirts later edited it out).
It isn't moderation bias, but it is a lack of willingness to compromise/negotiate with the community.[close]
Mack's post was deleted because he called out some BS.
Has anyone seen riddlez? I don't think he has posted since he said he was investigating the 63eLast Active:
and look at the 5th post he made on the day. I think the 63 "took care of him" if you know what I meanHas anyone seen riddlez? I don't think he has posted since he said he was investigating the 63eLast Active:
September 04, 2016, 02:23:18 pm
"Guys I have information that will lead to the removal of Kar--"
-Riddlez, before he died in a weightlifting accident at his home
Or had a barbell crush his throat while lifting weights, with signs of foul play all over the body."Guys I have information that will lead to the removal of Kar--"
-Riddlez, before he died in a weightlifting accident at his home
Probably beaten then shot in a "botched robbery" where his wallet, watch, and phone were left untouched in an upscale low-crime neighbourhood.
He had some real life activities that make him unable to come online for aprox. a week. He informed me of this.Fucking lies you murdered him. He had strong evidence of Karths abuses and now he is dead. Like Kennedy when he was fucking with federal reserve right to print money.
You guys are missing the connection here and mislabelling this. The reasons we stated are why we are slamming the 63e, not because of any special dislike. To tell you the truth I enjoyed being in the 63e, but the shit being pulled by the 63e is why I took that side. If solutions were proposed, debated, and then put in place, there wouldn't be any "hate" towards the 63e.
And you say it's irrational: it's completely rational to, as a community, announce displeasure towards the actions of a certain group.
In all fairness I am not directing my previous reply to all who are opposed to the 63e or have brought up a concern they have about us. At the end of the day criticism, as long as it is constructive, is healthy and I welcome it. That being said certain individuals have posted here out of pure prejudice against the 63e, it is to those people that my previous reply was aimed. The people who have made genuinely valid points, I (and I'm sure other 63e officers) have read and thought about them seriously.
Hmmm, I did that before in July in response to your thread, after the 63e decided to make a version of an event that was being formed by other members of the community. In fact, Munj, I believe you were the OP.
(https://i.imgur.com/S7lOBwY.png)
and that got deleted.
This post in response to it (made by General Squirts), is still up at this moment:
(https://i.gyazo.com/47472c6809f468ed69cb188ed3f0b62e.png)
on this thread:
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=32174.1269
Btw, I stopped reading after MunJ's post. I assume it was just a collection of stupid memes that totally undermined the point you guys were originally trying to make.
Two different sections of the forum, if you also look your original post is in the old NA community thread as well above, I was just memeing on an off topic board. Yours however was on a completely different section of the forum."i was just memeing hehe xd" ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Two different sections of the forum, if you also look your original post is in the old NA community thread as well above, I was just memeing on an off topic board. Yours however was on a completely different section of the forum.
Two different sections of the forum, if you also look your original post is in the old NA community thread as well above, I was just memeing on an off topic board. Yours however was on a completely different section of the forum.
Well, you did kinda post your image basically everywhere. You removed a few later, but we saw them.
yea their 10 warning points really showed you1111Two different sections of the forum, if you also look your original post is in the old NA community thread as well above, I was just memeing on an off topic board. Yours however was on a completely different section of the forum.
Well, you did kinda post your image basically everywhere. You removed a few later, but we saw them.
Yeah, that's when I got warned for spamming I believe. RIP.
yea their 10 warning points really showed you1111Two different sections of the forum, if you also look your original post is in the old NA community thread as well above, I was just memeing on an off topic board. Yours however was on a completely different section of the forum.
Well, you did kinda post your image basically everywhere. You removed a few later, but we saw them.
Yeah, that's when I got warned for spamming I believe. RIP.
I got banned for constructive analysis and you got 10 for spam. GreatFSE not biased confirmed.
Just a Squirts gets muted xDI got banned for constructive analysis and you got 10 for spam. GreatFSE not biased confirmed.
Yeah cuz of anti-muslim thread, thingy retards ...Just a Squirts gets muted xDI got banned for constructive analysis and you got 10 for spam. GreatFSE not biased confirmed.
Although this discussion has petered out somewhat, I would like to offer my thoughts (not condensed for anyone's convenience):
For those of you who recognize me you probably know that I was a part of both the 9y and the 3e. For those few of who are still around, you may recognize me as a member of the 12th and the majority of its reincarnations. For those of you who are no longer with us you might recognize me as a member of the 53e (RIP NEC). And for most of you I am a nobody and you've never pressed E in your life. I have led extensively in almost every regiment that I have been a part of (excluding the FKI and 63e [surprise I was in this regiment as well!]). I have also trolled around extensively on the forums and taken part in banter from the EPI to Church's glorious FG. Although Tico, Grimsight and the other respected leaders I have worked with may have certain perceptions about me as a community member, I know they respect the heavy involvement I have had in the NW Community-whether or not I have 6,000 posts or 10 tournament trophies under my belt.
All of this is not said for the benefit of my ego as, if you know me personally, I have never headed a solid (my 9y tribute regiments, though impressive, faded with the collective interest in NW) regiment. And I apparently was only ever good at kicking because I had shit internet for years and crutched on Turkish kicking. I say all of this because I know there are some people willing to go through this block, and acknowledge the weight I carry with my opinions on this matter.
The NW Community is not what it used to be. That in and of itself is not an inherently good or bad thing. I, personally, see NW, and the community, as a shell of its former self. It would unfair of me to ignore the elephant in the room: Warband and this module have been around longer than many of us thought possible both in the NW community, and in the other mods that have graced this game. Obviously, this affects NW as both players, regiments, and visions of the game have come and gone over the years. But I do not attribute the issues in NW today solely to a release date many years ago. From my observations, Warband has maintained it's usual population over the years. NW is only one part of the greater Warband collection, but it receives the same attention and treatment in sales as Native. The game has the players, but they aren't playing the game.
I will forego the discussion on the single player experience and the massive disparity between online and offline Warband players for the sake of this post.
Napoleonic Wars is just as good as it has always been as a game. FSE has maintained, while the Community has polished the aesthetic of it to change things up for the long-term players. And as the numbers show, people are not afraid to jump into this game because of perceived obsolescence. Napoleonic Wars is struggling because of the social dynamic that made me, and many others, play, rage quit, return, and love this game has been eroded. Say what you will about the NW of a few years ago. For all of its flaws and problems within the community, regiments thrived in and among of themselves, with and for each other's enjoyment. We all picked on the FKI, and Millander double ranked us to crap. The 3e trumped Milly and posted its win in bold in the TS channel. And at the end of the day we all showed up in the same events, and trashed each other in chat. And adding to the banter, Walko and the 4te strutting around with Bond and the 89th spazzing out. My timelines are not perfect, but I experienced all of this (both the big and the not so small) in the NW that I came to love. The reality of NW is that we no longer have the same faces to organize the community as we once had. Arguably, there are just as many bodies, but no faces with them. How did we get to this point? Time is one factor. But people are another. Specifically the people who run the regiments that make up this community. And to "bandwagon", as someone will most likely lash out, with the sentiment in this thread: the 63e has not helped.
Karth, though his actions and character are up to the court of public opinion (if there even is one in this divided community), worked to operate and maintain the 63e Siege server for years. In another time, I would thank Karth for housing 200 players. Today, I question his desire to strengthen this community. The discussion on whether or not Karth should change his server rules, or rather does the community have the authority to enforce a rule change, should have ended as quickly as it started: Karth's private server is his to dictate. The matter at hand is not Karth's right to administrate as he see fits, it is whether or not Karth's administration is helping the community. And when I say community, I do not mean the 63e with and in themselves. The Community is the cobbling of regiments (the 63e included) and players (both pub and private[?]) that come together to play this game. But it seems we are having issues cobbling up.
The fact of the matter is the 63e's monopoly (yes this is the proper use of the word please keep childish attempts at discourse away) on the the public (and often newcomer) population stifles any attempts for the NW Community to grow and thrive. My argument in short: Regiments cannot recruit, regiments cannot grow, community stagnates. The 63e Siege server, whether through merit or by virtue of being last one alive, attracts the most attention from the public. If your counter to my argument is, "Then the "Community" should form their own server against the 63e's" (which is the obvious sentiment revealed within this thread) then you are admitting to putting yourselves before the NW Community. Not only that, you are expressly challenging the community to a fight it cannot handle. If we had the excess of players that all of us have wanted, then the Community could survive a de facto civil war and there would be no need for serious discussion. If your response so far is, "that is not our problem" then you (I am addressing the 63e) nor anybody else has any reason being here. And guess what: you can totally do that and if that's what you want, what can anyone do about it. For Karth, and all those within the 63e that solely want to see how far they can go this is fine practice. If I was fixated on this vision of NW, I would be doing what Karth has, and continues to do. If Karth wants to do him, for him, and his gaming community, then so be it. But do not allow him to feign otherwise nor hold any positions within this community.
Now I assume if you are partaking in this thread, you care enough about the community to defend against any and all criticism levied against your respective parties. If this is not the case with the 63e, then they should not be here and should continue doing them. If this is the case, there is no discussion to be had. For the sake of this post, I assume there is some desire to normalize the tensions within this community and bring it back to some status quo that we can all agree on until this game passes and we all jump to another. If this is the case, if Karth truly wishes to defend himself on this community forum, AND put effort in to restore it to some something we can all respect, then let him keep his position as a core member (whether you like it or not) and contributor to this community.
Although I detest this saying immensely, it does at times take two to argue. And, if we follow that same logic, it takes two to find a solution. And if we take that logic in a tangent, not one party is solely responsible for our situation now. Before I continue, I do not legitimize any of Squirts' comments within this thread and I do not want one word of my post to resemble some type of support for him and his childish behavior (trust me, I was like him when I was 12 and started Warband- and I have grown).
The non-63e side of the discussion is at fault as awell, whether or not to the same degree as Karth and the 63e are is up to nobody. Regiment quality has gone down and I have seen in one week some of the weakest regiments both in size, and quality I have ever seen. Yes, the 63e situation may have affected it, but weak leadership among the regiments of NW has played a large role. The inter-regimental drama that has been created over the years has split regiments up and decentralized skill to the point of nonexistence. In this regard, the community as a whole can do better in both ensuring the encouragement, creation, and growth of regiments that truly care. Whether or not this is possible is an entirely different discussion.
On a more macro level, the organization of events, and inter-regimental cooperation has degraded. In this area, I applaud AP0C for attempting to bring the community together in some way. If we want to improve NW, we all need to take a hard look at ourselves and find the effort to put into this game. And I am writing this post for the sole purpose of putting forth the effort I want to see reflected in this community.
I do not have any authority over anyone, but I hope if you have read this post, you understand the choices we have. There is no more discussion we can have on this matter. Banter can go on, but meaningful discourse eventually comes to end and requires action. Whether or not we want to put in the effort, is for all of us to ask ourselves. If we all would prefer (or allow) the current state of NW to continue, then so be it. The 63e can do them. And everyone else can keep doing what they are doing.
We all need to change. Karth and the 63e need to be a part of that change, if they don't that is fine. But they represent no other community than their own. If you find that phrasing harsh, it is the truth. In addition to the 63e, the rest of the community needs to ask themselves if they want to put in the effort to make the game what it can be before its time truly comes.
Karth, we all just want to have fun. Push for the community, your effort could bring it back.
Community, we have gone through a lot, and its up to us now to decide if we want to or not. I have made my mind.
And if at the end of the day, NW has stayed the same, we can look forward to Bannerlord, WoR, and BCoF. And that is fine too.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Edited for grammar, PM me or discuss here if you wish. I hope to have pushed us to a decision, for the sake of this game that we all love. Also, I acknowledge I am not a 100% unbiased member in this community. But, in this matter, I pride myself for taking both sides and presenting the decisions we have before us. Pettiness has weakened this game, I want its chance to come back to be as pure as I can humanly make it.
Pro tip: Don't write long essays. People on FSE don't read them. Instead post a memeSpoilerAlthough this discussion has petered out somewhat, I would like to offer my thoughts (not condensed for anyone's convenience):
For those of you who recognize me you probably know that I was a part of both the 9y and the 3e. For those few of who are still around, you may recognize me as a member of the 12th and the majority of its reincarnations. For those of you who are no longer with us you might recognize me as a member of the 53e (RIP NEC). And for most of you I am a nobody and you've never pressed E in your life. I have led extensively in almost every regiment that I have been a part of (excluding the FKI and 63e [surprise I was in this regiment as well!]). I have also trolled around extensively on the forums and taken part in banter from the EPI to Church's glorious FG. Although Tico, Grimsight and the other respected leaders I have worked with may have certain perceptions about me as a community member, I know they respect the heavy involvement I have had in the NW Community-whether or not I have 6,000 posts or 10 tournament trophies under my belt.
All of this is not said for the benefit of my ego as, if you know me personally, I have never headed a solid (my 9y tribute regiments, though impressive, faded with the collective interest in NW) regiment. And I apparently was only ever good at kicking because I had shit internet for years and crutched on Turkish kicking. I say all of this because I know there are some people willing to go through this block, and acknowledge the weight I carry with my opinions on this matter.
The NW Community is not what it used to be. That in and of itself is not an inherently good or bad thing. I, personally, see NW, and the community, as a shell of its former self. It would unfair of me to ignore the elephant in the room: Warband and this module have been around longer than many of us thought possible both in the NW community, and in the other mods that have graced this game. Obviously, this affects NW as both players, regiments, and visions of the game have come and gone over the years. But I do not attribute the issues in NW today solely to a release date many years ago. From my observations, Warband has maintained it's usual population over the years. NW is only one part of the greater Warband collection, but it receives the same attention and treatment in sales as Native. The game has the players, but they aren't playing the game.
I will forego the discussion on the single player experience and the massive disparity between online and offline Warband players for the sake of this post.
Napoleonic Wars is just as good as it has always been as a game. FSE has maintained, while the Community has polished the aesthetic of it to change things up for the long-term players. And as the numbers show, people are not afraid to jump into this game because of perceived obsolescence. Napoleonic Wars is struggling because of the social dynamic that made me, and many others, play, rage quit, return, and love this game has been eroded. Say what you will about the NW of a few years ago. For all of its flaws and problems within the community, regiments thrived in and among of themselves, with and for each other's enjoyment. We all picked on the FKI, and Millander double ranked us to crap. The 3e trumped Milly and posted its win in bold in the TS channel. And at the end of the day we all showed up in the same events, and trashed each other in chat. And adding to the banter, Walko and the 4te strutting around with Bond and the 89th spazzing out. My timelines are not perfect, but I experienced all of this (both the big and the not so small) in the NW that I came to love. The reality of NW is that we no longer have the same faces to organize the community as we once had. Arguably, there are just as many bodies, but no faces with them. How did we get to this point? Time is one factor. But people are another. Specifically the people who run the regiments that make up this community. And to "bandwagon", as someone will most likely lash out, with the sentiment in this thread: the 63e has not helped.
Karth, though his actions and character are up to the court of public opinion (if there even is one in this divided community), worked to operate and maintain the 63e Siege server for years. In another time, I would thank Karth for housing 200 players. Today, I question his desire to strengthen this community. The discussion on whether or not Karth should change his server rules, or rather does the community have the authority to enforce a rule change, should have ended as quickly as it started: Karth's private server is his to dictate. The matter at hand is not Karth's right to administrate as he see fits, it is whether or not Karth's administration is helping the community. And when I say community, I do not mean the 63e with and in themselves. The Community is the cobbling of regiments (the 63e included) and players (both pub and private[?]) that come together to play this game. But it seems we are having issues cobbling up.
The fact of the matter is the 63e's monopoly (yes this is the proper use of the word please keep childish attempts at discourse away) on the the public (and often newcomer) population stifles any attempts for the NW Community to grow and thrive. My argument in short: Regiments cannot recruit, regiments cannot grow, community stagnates. The 63e Siege server, whether through merit or by virtue of being last one alive, attracts the most attention from the public. If your counter to my argument is, "Then the "Community" should form their own server against the 63e's" (which is the obvious sentiment revealed within this thread) then you are admitting to putting yourselves before the NW Community. Not only that, you are expressly challenging the community to a fight it cannot handle. If we had the excess of players that all of us have wanted, then the Community could survive a de facto civil war and there would be no need for serious discussion. If your response so far is, "that is not our problem" then you (I am addressing the 63e) nor anybody else has any reason being here. And guess what: you can totally do that and if that's what you want, what can anyone do about it. For Karth, and all those within the 63e that solely want to see how far they can go this is fine practice. If I was fixated on this vision of NW, I would be doing what Karth has, and continues to do. If Karth wants to do him, for him, and his gaming community, then so be it. But do not allow him to feign otherwise nor hold any positions within this community.
Now I assume if you are partaking in this thread, you care enough about the community to defend against any and all criticism levied against your respective parties. If this is not the case with the 63e, then they should not be here and should continue doing them. If this is the case, there is no discussion to be had. For the sake of this post, I assume there is some desire to normalize the tensions within this community and bring it back to some status quo that we can all agree on until this game passes and we all jump to another. If this is the case, if Karth truly wishes to defend himself on this community forum, AND put effort in to restore it to some something we can all respect, then let him keep his position as a core member (whether you like it or not) and contributor to this community.
Although I detest this saying immensely, it does at times take two to argue. And, if we follow that same logic, it takes two to find a solution. And if we take that logic in a tangent, not one party is solely responsible for our situation now. Before I continue, I do not legitimize any of Squirts' comments within this thread and I do not want one word of my post to resemble some type of support for him and his childish behavior (trust me, I was like him when I was 12 and started Warband- and I have grown).
The non-63e side of the discussion is at fault as awell, whether or not to the same degree as Karth and the 63e are is up to nobody. Regiment quality has gone down and I have seen in one week some of the weakest regiments both in size, and quality I have ever seen. Yes, the 63e situation may have affected it, but weak leadership among the regiments of NW has played a large role. The inter-regimental drama that has been created over the years has split regiments up and decentralized skill to the point of nonexistence. In this regard, the community as a whole can do better in both ensuring the encouragement, creation, and growth of regiments that truly care. Whether or not this is possible is an entirely different discussion.
On a more macro level, the organization of events, and inter-regimental cooperation has degraded. In this area, I applaud AP0C for attempting to bring the community together in some way. If we want to improve NW, we all need to take a hard look at ourselves and find the effort to put into this game. And I am writing this post for the sole purpose of putting forth the effort I want to see reflected in this community.
I do not have any authority over anyone, but I hope if you have read this post, you understand the choices we have. There is no more discussion we can have on this matter. Banter can go on, but meaningful discourse eventually comes to end and requires action. Whether or not we want to put in the effort, is for all of us to ask ourselves. If we all would prefer (or allow) the current state of NW to continue, then so be it. The 63e can do them. And everyone else can keep doing what they are doing.
We all need to change. Karth and the 63e need to be a part of that change, if they don't that is fine. But they represent no other community than their own. If you find that phrasing harsh, it is the truth. In addition to the 63e, the rest of the community needs to ask themselves if they want to put in the effort to make the game what it can be before its time truly comes.
Karth, we all just want to have fun. Push for the community, your effort could bring it back.
Community, we have gone through a lot, and its up to us now to decide if we want to or not. I have made my mind.
And if at the end of the day, NW has stayed the same, we can look forward to Bannerlord, WoR, and BCoF. And that is fine too.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Edited for grammar, PM me or discuss here if you wish. I hope to have pushed us to a decision, for the sake of this game that we all love. Also, I acknowledge I am not a 100% unbiased member in this community. But, in this matter, I pride myself for taking both sides and presenting the decisions we have before us. Pettiness has weakened this game, I want its chance to come back to be as pure as I can humanly make it.[close]
Well written AntonioI bet you didn't even read it hahahah xD
Well written AntonioI bet you didn't even read it hahahah xD
I read it don't really get the point his mostly rambling around, could have made it much shorter.
Actually I did take the time to read the entire thingWell written AntonioI bet you didn't even read it hahahah xD
I read it don't really get the point his mostly rambling around, could have made it much shorter.
Well written AntonioI bet you didn't even read it hahahah xD
I read it don't really get the point his mostly rambling around, could have made it much shorter.
I get what he is saying and I completely agree. I have tried to make similar points earlier in this thread.
Though, he truly did write an essay, he had an intro paragraph introducing himself and all.
Pro tip: Don't write long essays. People on FSE don't read them. Instead post a meme
you can explain a point without writing a full essay.Pro tip: Don't write long essays. People on FSE don't read them. Instead post a meme
The whole damn point was that if people quit vomiting memes all the time, somebody would eventually be able to broker solutions.
Pro tip: Don't write long essays. People on FSE don't read them. Instead post a meme
The whole damn point was that if people quit vomiting memes all the time, somebody would eventually be able to broker solutions.
So I came back yesterday from a field exercise and thought to check if anyone has posted here. A spectacular 24 pages mostly about the 63e. I will dig into the matter this weekend and hope to put it to rest this weekend as well. The matter seems suprisingly simple.name me regent
I will keep you posted. I will PM, steam-pm and get on TS of the parties involved. Expect me.
Now that was an interesting read.
And a suprisingly stupid conversation. Really people, you guys need to grow up.
Now that was an interesting read.
And a suprisingly stupid conversation. Really people, you guys need to grow up. All of you. I commend Ap0c for his tries to lead this into a meaningful discussion but you guys absolutely ruined it.
To the 'anti-63e' camp:
Grow up. Yes there are some factors that, granted, are a little bit shady if you want to make the community a better one, which makes me understand why the 63e isa disliked, but really. You can just sit down with some members of the 63e in their teamspeak or your own, to discuss things and let your grievances be heard. It would be wise for the 63e to listen to them and even work on some of them, because fi you would've gone about this maturely, and the 63e would only shitpost and ban people, you could maturely make a statement about what happened, which could then ruin the 63e's credibility.
to the 63e members
Grow up. It is mildly amusing how you claim to be open toi 'mature conversation' in teamspeak, while most of you just shitpost and complain about the people who don't like you. Perhaps it is time for some self-reflection. You do not help your own position by having your members behave like this on the forums. PLease work on it.
I can be found on the 63e teamspeak server this afternoon and evening, and I will be speaking to 63e members as much as I can.
UPDATE:
I have spoken to one of the 63e admins. I will publish the results of this conversation later, but allow me to make one thing very clear:
The 63e is not intentionally trying to harm the community. It is not their intent to steal new recruits, steal people from events or badly influence smaller regiments.
They do not want this fight. Neither do I and the rest of the community. Steps have been taken to move forward, and I expect results to be noticable iun a matter of days.
Maybe unlock 71st thread, Duuring would rather ignore my Pms then help out so I thought I would ask here.not the best way to ask...
Will you be good boys and post your edgey memes on the alt right thread I made?Yes Mr. Lyps3
I tried asking many other ways my boyMaybe unlock 71st thread, Duuring would rather ignore my Pms then help out so I thought I would ask here.not the best way to ask...
I tried asking many other ways my boyMaybe unlock 71st thread, Duuring would rather ignore my Pms then help out so I thought I would ask here.not the best way to ask...
I tried asking many other ways my boyMaybe unlock 71st thread, Duuring would rather ignore my Pms then help out so I thought I would ask here.not the best way to ask...
Maybe you could, you know, just ask me sooner
In a polite manner
You silly meme
Just wanna clear things up on old post. Myself I find the 63e annoying but they got to where they are by hard work. Myself I think yes they do hold the commuinty back but comon people. We're fucking Americans grow a backbone and put the time in to start your own regiment and then look at your own achievements and yourself and not those other twats and what they have. So I hear a lot of hate for the 63e but frankly I still laugh at thier cadets melee(I'm sure karth does to) but in the end spend the time and work hard. Then boom there's your commuinty.you bring 5 whole members to every event. don't act like you are a huge regiment and did it all by yourself.
Two words, Merc regiment.
Server is up, *NA_Assaultout of curiosity what are these scripts?
got some cool ass scripts
might start hosting pub events there as well
well vortex I'd like to tell you you guys cancled a 1v1 with the AEF because you only had 5 guys on. And I'd also point out for TNWL we had 20 people show up. And on aveage we bring 12-15. And also almost every member in my regiment has been recuirts by me. Sadly I haven't had a good officer staff other than applo so most responsibility fall to me.Just wanna clear things up on old post. Myself I find the 63e annoying but they got to where they are by hard work. Myself I think yes they do hold the commuinty back but comon people. We're fucking Americans grow a backbone and put the time in to start your own regiment and then look at your own achievements and yourself and not those other twats and what they have. So I hear a lot of hate for the 63e but frankly I still laugh at thier cadets melee(I'm sure karth does to) but in the end spend the time and work hard. Then boom there's your commuinty.you bring 5 whole members to every event. don't act like you are a huge regiment and did it all by yourself.
Two words, Merc regiment.AEF do use mercs yes. Mainly because it's fun for me to get a bunch of diffrent people together I don't normally play with and fight regiemnts. If you ever think the AEF by itself is bad then look at TNWL where we lost to the 32e 4-6 when they have lost to the 1er 6-4 and beat the 58e and 45e as with about the same scores.
Server is up, *NA_Assaultout of curiosity what are these scripts?
got some cool ass scripts
might start hosting pub events there as well
asian told you we had 5 guys on so he didnt have to say we don't want to have a shit 10v10 lb when we bring 20 people. also why the fuck do you consistently spell recruits or recruiting or recruit like recuirt, shit dont make sense famwell vortex I'd like to tell you you guys cancled a 1v1 with the AEF because you only had 5 guys on. And I'd also point out for TNWL we had 20 people show up. And on aveage we bring 12-15. And also almost every member in my regiment has been recuirts by me. Sadly I haven't had a good officer staff other than applo so most responsibility fall to me.Just wanna clear things up on old post. Myself I find the 63e annoying but they got to where they are by hard work. Myself I think yes they do hold the commuinty back but comon people. We're fucking Americans grow a backbone and put the time in to start your own regiment and then look at your own achievements and yourself and not those other twats and what they have. So I hear a lot of hate for the 63e but frankly I still laugh at thier cadets melee(I'm sure karth does to) but in the end spend the time and work hard. Then boom there's your commuinty.you bring 5 whole members to every event. don't act like you are a huge regiment and did it all by yourself.
Two words, Merc regiment.AEF do use mercs yes. Mainly because it's fun for me to get a bunch of diffrent people together I don't normally play with and fight regiemnts. If you ever think the AEF by itself is bad then look at TNWL where we lost to the 32e 4-6 when they have lost to the 1er 6-4 and beat the 58e and 45e as with about the same scores.
i remember going to an AEF lb with pretty much the whole 71st. i think it was against teh 58e or 1er (aef lost 6-4)pretty sure it was the 1er and why we call the aef a merc regiment now
Server is up, *NA_Assaultout of curiosity what are these scripts?
got some cool ass scripts
might start hosting pub events there as well
The new "Merc regiment" is now the 32e. For at least the 1er to go to.Heard that also ^^
The new "Merc regiment" is now the 32e. For at least the 1er to go to.there are 6 of us that actually joined the 32e, and only 6. Me, Asian, Godfreid, PJ, and Goku.
"Only 6"The new "Merc regiment" is now the 32e. For at least the 1er to go to.there are 6 of us that actually joined the 32e, and only 6. Me, Asian, Godfreid, PJ, and Goku.
"joined"=double regging. So I guess since other regiments no longer want to face you guys you decide to join a regiment not as good so you can have more events?The new "Merc regiment" is now the 32e. For at least the 1er to go to.there are 6 of us that actually joined the 32e, and only 6. Me, Asian, Godfreid, PJ, and Goku.
yes"joined"=double regging. So I guess since other regiments no longer want to face you guys you decide to join a regiment not as good so you can have more events?The new "Merc regiment" is now the 32e. For at least the 1er to go to.there are 6 of us that actually joined the 32e, and only 6. Me, Asian, Godfreid, PJ, and Goku.
._.
So is that how 32e won TNWL?we didnt play for tnwl. (super didnt want us to anyway)
Ahh ok so I was lied to that's your argument sounds good. Guess it seems like we don't have 5 people huh. And if you wanna care about spelling take it up with a English teacher.asian told you we had 5 guys on so he didnt have to say we don't want to have a shit 10v10 lb when we bring 20 people. also why the fuck do you consistently spell recruits or recruiting or recruit like recuirt, shit dont make sense famwell vortex I'd like to tell you you guys cancled a 1v1 with the AEF because you only had 5 guys on. And I'd also point out for TNWL we had 20 people show up. And on aveage we bring 12-15. And also almost every member in my regiment has been recuirts by me. Sadly I haven't had a good officer staff other than applo so most responsibility fall to me.Just wanna clear things up on old post. Myself I find the 63e annoying but they got to where they are by hard work. Myself I think yes they do hold the commuinty back but comon people. We're fucking Americans grow a backbone and put the time in to start your own regiment and then look at your own achievements and yourself and not those other twats and what they have. So I hear a lot of hate for the 63e but frankly I still laugh at thier cadets melee(I'm sure karth does to) but in the end spend the time and work hard. Then boom there's your commuinty.you bring 5 whole members to every event. don't act like you are a huge regiment and did it all by yourself.
This is why NA is better than EU
reported. Too soonThis is why NA is better than EU
And here I was thinking that Britain made the best Period Dramas ::)
Server is up, *NA_Assault
got some cool ass scripts
might start hosting pub events there as well
Apoc>mack
Server is up, *NA_Assaulthows the server goin?
got some cool ass scripts
might start hosting pub events there as well
Not good, yall arent hoppin on it.i tried to go on it yesterday but I couldn't even find the server. My mount and blade has been acting up like that recently. Like some servers just never show up
Probably will have to get pub events going to get the ball rolling at all.
Not good, yall arent hoppin on it.i tried to go on it yesterday but I couldn't even find the server. My mount and blade has been acting up like that recently. Like some servers just never show up
Probably will have to get pub events going to get the ball rolling at all.
Not good, yall arent hoppin on it.i tried to go on it yesterday but I couldn't even find the server. My mount and blade has been acting up like that recently. Like some servers just never show up
Probably will have to get pub events going to get the ball rolling at all.
Note the server name has been changed. Was talking to APOC about getting a pub event open for it as well as just a reg event for the server. Would it be better to invite regiments for the reg event?
Apoc>mack
NA_Assault_Eventmemes
Guess a new election isn't happening
Well then
All hail your god emperor, AP0C
King of NW, Conqueror of Tammo, Bringer of the Law, Maker of the news, Winner of the Skins, Captain of the 58e, Top tier of the list, Savior of the 71st thread, Memer of the Dreams
My reign shall be eternal, and we shall bring glory to NA
JK im gonna go play Dark Souls now
Well then
All hail your god emperor, AP0C
Jester of NW, Foot Polisher of Tammo, Destroyer of the Law, When I feel likt it I'll do it maker of the news, Winner of the foreskins, Captain of the 58blee, Top queer of the list, Savior of the 71st dead, Memer of the Dreams (kept this cause this is true)
My reign shall be eternal, and we shall bring gloryholes to NA
You dare insult your Emperor? I sentence you to death!Godfried is your police?
Godfreid, take him away
Well then
All hail your god emperor, AP0C
Jester of NW, Foot Polisher of Tammo, Destroyer of the Law, When I feel likt it I'll do it maker of the news, Winner of the foreskins, Captain of the 58blee, Top queer of the list, Savior of the 71st dead, Memer of the Dreams (kept this cause this is true)
My reign shall be eternal, and we shall bring gloryholes to NA
be careful goin after squirts. I hear Karth is his defense attorney and he has connections within the FSE courtsSquirts, you are hereby brought to notice. This edited message aforementioned is libelous and slanderous, and this serves as a warning notice. If you make another edit like this that slanders my clients reputation, I will sue you through the FSE courts for libel. This is not in your best interests. Please refrain from making comments such as this in the future.Spoiler
Well then
All hail your god emperor, AP0C
Jester of NW, Foot Polisher of Tammo, Destroyer of the Law, When I feel likt it I'll do it maker of the news, Winner of the foreskins, Captain of the 58blee, Top queer of the list, Savior of the 71st dead, Memer of the Dreams (kept this cause this is true)
My reign shall be eternal, and we shall bring gloryholes to NA[close]
My defense is that I still let Mr. Ap0c keep his title of Memer of the Dreams, which he rightfully claims. He has lead the community into greener pastures. But please, don't do this to me. I'm still young, I haven't even took out a mortgage yet. I've only had the opportunity to report BabyJ only 49 times. This will ruin me for the rest of my life. So I beg to the 7th Meme Court District to please show mercy on me for I have done nothing wrong.I'm not a judge, i'm a lawyer. Beg the district Judge, Saltyy.
No not dj saltyy!My defense is that I still let Mr. Ap0c keep his title of Memer of the Dreams, which he rightfully claims. He has lead the community into greener pastures. But please, don't do this to me. I'm still young, I haven't even took out a mortgage yet. I've only had the opportunity to report BabyJ only 49 times. This will ruin me for the rest of my life. So I beg to the 7th Meme Court District to please show mercy on me for I have done nothing wrong.I'm not a judge, i'm a lawyer. Beg the district Judge, Saltyy.
guess i can make a new thread for people to apply in a bit if durring cant.(probably really busy)