Napoleonic Wars Draft League (4v4) {Season 1 Thread}{Champions: Aces}

[Horse]

to add on, he also said if i remember 'resume at 58:40' not go. Every round  Rune and I would both type R to agree to start the round, we did not agree to start this round, i'm not sure how that weighs into it but it was just something that came to my mind, if the timeout pauses the match, once the timeout ends shouldn't we act as if its the start of a round again ?

[JollyCanadian]

Spoiler

to add on, he also said if i remember 'resume at 58:40' not go. Every round  Rune and I would both type R to agree to start the round, we did not agree to start this round, i'm not sure how that weighs into it but it was just something that came to my mind, if the timeout pauses the match, once the timeout ends shouldn't we act as if its the start of a round again ?

[close]

21:00:02 - *Admin*[USA_Jakester]: play will reusme at 58:40

 21:01:09 - [Griffins_Number10] its 58:40
 21:01:12 - *SPEC* [[Beserkers]SUPERB*PEDRO] fact: people like my server better than moraines
 21:01:13 - [Griffins~Runepkyz] r
 21:01:16 - [BeR]ZeR[KeR]s_RussianFury has joined the game with ID: 288827
 21:01:17 - *SPEC* [[Beserkers]SUPERB*PEDRO] 67% fact
 21:01:17 - Griffins_Cytiuz <img=ico_spear> Berserkers_PolarBurr
 21:01:27 - Griffins~Runepkyz <img=ico_spear> berSERKERS_MrWhaleFish
 21:01:31 - Griffins~Runepkyz <img=ico_spear> Be[Zer]Ker[Rs]_Horse


Rune said r  then his team charged.

[Moraine]

tbh my opinion. If the match was won by only 1 round make both teams play again this time have more than 1 ref like how EU do it. Since the match was that close and lost a round by a trick of procedure I think that would be a fair option.

[Horse]

Spoiler

to add on, he also said if i remember 'resume at 58:40' not go. Every round  Rune and I would both type R to agree to start the round, we did not agree to start this round, i'm not sure how that weighs into it but it was just something that came to my mind, if the timeout pauses the match, once the timeout ends shouldn't we act as if its the start of a round again ?

[close]

21:00:02 - *Admin*[USA_Jakester]: play will reusme at 58:40

 21:01:09 - [Griffins_Number10] its 58:40
 21:01:12 - *SPEC* [[Beserkers]SUPERB*PEDRO] fact: people like my server better than moraines
 21:01:13 - [Griffins~Runepkyz] r
 21:01:16 - [BeR]ZeR[KeR]s_RussianFury has joined the game with ID: 288827
 21:01:17 - *SPEC* [[Beserkers]SUPERB*PEDRO] 67% fact
 21:01:17 - Griffins_Cytiuz <img=ico_spear> Berserkers_PolarBurr
 21:01:27 - Griffins~Runepkyz <img=ico_spear> berSERKERS_MrWhaleFish
 21:01:31 - Griffins~Runepkyz <img=ico_spear> Be[Zer]Ker[Rs]_Horse


Rune said r  then his team charged.

no R on my end

[Runepkyz]

Griffins 16 v. 14 Bezerkers

[close]

Gf.

[Stroke0fd34th]

to add on, he also said if i remember 'resume at 58:40' not go. Every round  Rune and I would both type R to agree to start the round, we did not agree to start this round, i'm not sure how that weighs into it but it was just something that came to my mind, if the timeout pauses the match, once the timeout ends shouldn't we act as if its the start of a round again ?

21:00:02 - *Admin*[USA_Jakester]: play will reusme at 58:40

 21:01:09 - [Griffins_Number10] its 58:40
 21:01:12 - *SPEC* [[Beserkers]SUPERB*PEDRO] fact: people like my server better than moraines
 21:01:13 - [Griffins~Runepkyz] r
 21:01:16 - [BeR]ZeR[KeR]s_RussianFury has joined the game with ID: 288827
 21:01:17 - *SPEC* [[Beserkers]SUPERB*PEDRO] 67% fact
 21:01:17 - Griffins_Cytiuz <img=ico_spear> Berserkers_PolarBurr
 21:01:27 - Griffins~Runepkyz <img=ico_spear> berSERKERS_MrWhaleFish
 21:01:31 - Griffins~Runepkyz <img=ico_spear> Be[Zer]Ker[Rs]_Horse


Rune said r  then his team charged.

That doesn't mean "go" though. That just means the match will resume. Which, as Horse said, it's supposed to be treated as the start of a new round again. Both teams are supposed to be given the opportunity to type ready, and the referee should say "go" as he had been through out the match.

And the rest of that just  makes this all look worse. Rune said r, Horse didn't, and wasn't given the opportunity to type r. There's also 4 seconds between rune typing r and Cytiuz murdering Krast. There's absolutely no reason to uphold that round.

[JollyCanadian]

to add on, he also said if i remember 'resume at 58:40' not go. Every round  Rune and I would both type R to agree to start the round, we did not agree to start this round, i'm not sure how that weighs into it but it was just something that came to my mind, if the timeout pauses the match, once the timeout ends shouldn't we act as if its the start of a round again ?

21:00:02 - *Admin*[USA_Jakester]: play will reusme at 58:40

 21:01:09 - [Griffins_Number10] its 58:40
 21:01:12 - *SPEC* [[Beserkers]SUPERB*PEDRO] fact: people like my server better than moraines
 21:01:13 - [Griffins~Runepkyz] r
 21:01:16 - [BeR]ZeR[KeR]s_RussianFury has joined the game with ID: 288827
 21:01:17 - *SPEC* [[Beserkers]SUPERB*PEDRO] 67% fact
 21:01:17 - Griffins_Cytiuz <img=ico_spear> Berserkers_PolarBurr
 21:01:27 - Griffins~Runepkyz <img=ico_spear> berSERKERS_MrWhaleFish
 21:01:31 - Griffins~Runepkyz <img=ico_spear> Be[Zer]Ker[Rs]_Horse


Rune said r  then his team charged.

That doesn't mean "go" though. That just means the match will resume. Which, as Horse said, it's supposed to be treated as the start of a new round again. Both teams are supposed to be given the opportunity to type ready, and the referee should say "go" as he had been through out the match.

And the rest of that just  makes this all look worse. Rune said r, Horse didn't, and wasn't given the opportunity to type r. There's also 4 seconds between rune typing r and Cytiuz murdering Krast. There's absolutely no reason to uphold that round.

I'm not giving my opinion with that post. I'm just giving everyone context

[~NickCole~]

tbh my opinion. If the match was won by only 1 round make both teams play again this time have more than 1 ref like how EU do it. Since the match was that close and lost a round by a trick of procedure I think that would be a fair option.

You don't need 2 refs to watch a 4v4 GF match.

[Yoshiee]

tbh my opinion. If the match was won by only 1 round make both teams play again this time have more than 1 ref like how EU do it. Since the match was that close and lost a round by a trick of procedure I think that would be a fair option.

You don't need 2 refs to watch a 4v4 GF match.

alright mr 25y second in command (led by a  13 years old by the way)

[~NickCole~]

tbh my opinion. If the match was won by only 1 round make both teams play again this time have more than 1 ref like how EU do it. Since the match was that close and lost a round by a trick of procedure I think that would be a fair option.

You don't need 2 refs to watch a 4v4 GF match.

alright mr 25y second in command (led by a  13 years old by the way)

What are you talkin about N00bshie?

[Yoshiee]

rekt https://gyazo.com/b509eb31a73f8ba032d44949438611a4 steam link not allowed but this is (i believe)

[~NickCole~]

rekt https://gyazo.com/b509eb31a73f8ba032d44949438611a4 steam link not allowed but this is (i believe)

Check again retard

[JollyCanadian]

rekt https://gyazo.com/b509eb31a73f8ba032d44949438611a4 steam link not allowed but this is (i believe)

Check again retard

Get off this thread

[Moraine]

tbh my opinion. If the match was won by only 1 round make both teams play again this time have more than 1 ref like how EU do it. Since the match was that close and lost a round by a trick of procedure I think that would be a fair option.

You don't need 2 refs to watch a 4v4 GF match.

You would know if you refd anything in EU that 2 refs make sure that if one doesn't know or isn't sure another one can check rules ect while the other continues to admin or vice versa can assure things like what happen tonight cannot happen.  But of course you know better than me.

[~NickCole~]

tbh my opinion. If the match was won by only 1 round make both teams play again this time have more than 1 ref like how EU do it. Since the match was that close and lost a round by a trick of procedure I think that would be a fair option.

You don't need 2 refs to watch a 4v4 GF match.

You would know if you refd anything in EU that 2 refs make sure that if one doesn't know or isn't sure another one can check rules ect while the other continues to admin or vice versa can assure things like what happen tonight cannot happen.  But of course you know better than me.

I can understand for a 1v1 but for a 4v4 match you just need 1 ref that knows the rules. Sure a backup Ref doesn't hurt but one should be enough.