Palmares Hunters 2 - 4 Yorkshire Highlanders
A match... hard to find a good way to word it.
Let's point out the good things first: nice attendance (70v70 and above) and very close rounds. Most rounds ended with the winning side having less than 10 men. That's about it already though.
Now to the problems of this match:
-Camping. The Nr1 problem in this match. Both sides just chilled and shot at each other waiting for the admins to call an all charge (5/6 rounds we had to issue an all charge).
-Drawn out melee. After the all charge was issued it took at least 5 minutes each round for melee to end. That's not because people were playing so damn sick that they just blocked everything, but plainly because everyone kept running and waiting for the Cav to decide the all charge.
-Behavior in chat. The first 2 rounds were absolutely chaotic. Nr13 requested a chat restriction in round 3. A few slays had to be issued to make sure everybody actually obeys the chat rule. 1 person was banned from the server due to racial & anti semitic slurs and insults directed at the referees.
The other referees and I were bored out of our minds watching this match. No tactics, no teamplay, nothing. Instead both sides camp, shoot a little bit, and wait for the refs to call all charge. The 3 of us were joking about playing some Among Us after issuing the all charge, as it took at least 5-10 minutes for melee to finish each round.
I, personally, see the main issue in this match, along with the sheer unwillingness of either team to actually play the format they signed up for and playing a 70v70 GF with Cav support instead, with the rules about all charge. The fact that Cavalry can stay mounted during all charge is absolutely stupid. In most of the rounds played the cavalry of either team was the one that won or lost the round. The Infantry just kept running away whilst their mounted friends pick off enemies one by one. The other referees and I were arguing about telling Cav to dismount, decided against it however as we knew there was some talk about this on the forum before already. Our reasoning behind that was that if there was a talk about a rule before already and that didn't lead to changing it, then we do not have the authority to overrule that one.
But that's just my view and opinion on the whole matter. WP to both sides. I, however, refuse to call this a "good game".