(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1057.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ft388%2FPhoenix7777%2FRGL-3_zpskik4pnps.png&hash=7499c005c5d0cac6cd95e73daf4daa9c30b44196) 1.1.1. We are going to distinguish between regiments and teams. The team is the group of players who are fighting in the arena. Spectators are members of the regiment but not members of the “team”. 1.1.2. You can change the members of the team, while the league is not finished. This changes don’t have to be announced. 1.1.3. Invites aren't allowed. 1.1.4. You are only allowed to play for ONE Regiment. You can NOT be in 2 Regiments that both participate. 1.1.5. If you are not in the Steam group of a Regiment during the match you are considered as an Invite. 1.2.1. Both teams must have the same attendance at the beginning of the round. 15-25 are allowed. 1.2.2. If one team has less than 15 players, the other one is still allowed to play with 15 men. 1.2.3. If the round has started and a player drops, the enemy team doesn’t have to balance. 1.2.4. Players are not allowed to join in after the round has started. 1.2.5. You are only allowed to choose rankers. 2.1.1. The referee opens/starts the round. 2.1.2. Before the referee opens the round, both teams have to stay behind the white line/marking. 2.1.3. Before the referee starts the round, both Teamcaptains have to type in that they're ready. 2.2.1. 20 rounds are to be played. 2.2.2. If a team has to leave before the 20 rounds are reached or doesn’t attend to the match, then the enemy team gets all “not played” rounds, unless the referee decides something else. 2.3.1. It’s only allowed to use the bayonet as melee weapon. 2.4.1. It’s prohibited to leave the arena 2.5.1. No delaying 2.6.1. You must use the name you are known under, unless the regiment you are in uses historical names. then the referee must go on the TS of the regiment to check for invites 2.7.1. No spamming in chat. 2.7.2. Be respectful. 3.1.1. The organization has a privilege in all decisions. 3.1.2. Organizer's announcements have to treated like rules. 3.2.1. The matches do not have to be played in the Matchweek they belong to. There will be a deadline announced when we are half way through the Tournament. 3.2.2. Both captains have to agree on the date of the match. 3.3.1. The RGL is a tournament with a league-system. You will get 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points if you lose. 3.4.1. Matches and their dates have to be announced on the RGL-thread. Referees are to be organized independend. Both teams have to agree on a referee. 3.5.1. If a captain can't be attending a match, he may give the responsibility to one of his officers. The referee has to be informed. 3.5.2. If a regiment wants to change the team's Captain it has to be announced. 3.6.1. A referee has to be present at every match. 3.7.1. The referee decision can be changed through the organization. 3.7.2. All complaints have to get passed to the organisators. 3.8.1. Rules can get changed, added and remoted while the league is still active. It will be announced 4.1.1. The matches can only be played on the Official RGL Servers. 4.1.2. If all servers are booked for a specific time, the one that booked last has to postpone. 4.2.1. You only fight on the maps made for the RGL 4.3.1. Only referees may get the admin password. 4.3.2. Before the match starts the referee changes the password and send it to both captains on steam. 4.4.1. Both Captains have to agree to kick out the specs. The RGL will end on the 2nd of October | (https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1057.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ft388%2FPhoenix7777%2FRGL-4_zpsn3qqz8od.png&hash=7dd45cd31d3429681aa75f860cc705a8b2ac9001)
Referees: Spoiler
[close] (https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1057.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ft388%2FPhoenix7777%2FRGL-5_zpszhgyxxt0.png&hash=296d78f44406ae3532e1b2bbed5e03e2ff04b8e2)
Announce a match: Who against Who: Date: Time: Referee (If chosen): (https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1057.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ft388%2FPhoenix7777%2FRGL-6_zps0awlyivp.png&hash=5896b3407af273b18137e8608eb23a8eee7464a7) Special thanks to Cazasar, Phoenix and Hunter for giving the league to us so it can go on!Also thanks go to Arctic servers for providing 3 servers of excellent quality (https://i.gyazo.com/673c6ab9124d53094ed81f4acbdd2ddf.png) (http://www.arcticservers.co.uk/index.html) |
WHAT A SHIT LEAGUE KYS
WHAT A SHIT LEAGUE KYS
you are shit
Name: Gi
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Giqq/
Experience: reffing gf matches
Why you want to be a Referee: To ref when the 15th doesn't have anything
When do you have time: When the 15th isn't doing something
Name : 63e2nd 63e sign up?
Team-Captain: Munj
Team-Captain's Steam: [63e] Munj
Normal Attendance: 15-20
Name: DarkTemplar
Steam: [72nd] DarkTemplar
Experience: GF Admin, RGL Ref both seasons, NWL Ref, GFL Ref
Why you want to be a Referee:cause I was the season before and still want to be one :3
When do you have time: evriday except mondays
Name: Salakiem
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Salakien
Experience: NWL , NLC
Why you want to be a Referee: Its good to have more referee
When do you have time: monday,wednesday,thursday,sunday
Name: LoneACCEPTED
Steam: You`ve got me
Experience: NWWC 2016, RGF, NWGFL, several little Tournaments
Why you want to be a Referee: To help you out keeping RGL going.
When do you have time: Not sure yet
Name : 94th Regiment of Foot
Team-Captain: Jeff McBiggie
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/jeffmcbiggie
Normal Attendance:20 invites
RktName : 94th Regiment of Foot
Team-Captain: Jeff McBiggie
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/jeffmcbiggie
Normal Attendance:20 invites
noice
Name: FrittentimeACCEPTED
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Frittentime
Experience: Some duel tournaments
Why you want to be a Referee: I want to help the organizers. I also enjoy it to ref some intense gf matches.
When do you have time: nearly everyday, maybe some probs at weekend but should be fine.
Name: Destiny
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198048432453/
Experience: NWWC Ref, Admin for Regs i was in
Why you want to be a Referee: RGL is the best event in the community and i want to engage for it
When do you have time: actuel regimentless but nevertheless active player, nearly every day i am online
Name: WüstenfuchsACCEPTED
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/wuestenfuchsger
Experience: former RGL ref, NWL ref, former GFL ref, former NWBC ref, ex event hoster, ...
Why you want to be a Referee: in my freetime I want to help the league
When do you have time: ever when 6te has no events
For a friend:
Name: SkY
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198062296223/
Experience: I was RGL ref in the last season
Why you want to be a Referee: I want to continue my work as a referee.for the league.
When do you have time: Mostly every day in the weak
Jumpstabs are allowed, yey
Name: MoussoliniACCEPTED
Steam: I'll put link when I come home again, besides I got Rommel
Experience: I've been ref in both previous RGL's, NWlL season 7, NLC season 2, NWGFL, NWML and some other small stuff.
Why do you want to be a Referee: Because I've been referee since it started to help enforce the rules in every match that I have ref'd.
When do you have time: Almost everyday at times when my regiment doesn't have any serious events or any at all.
Name : 15th YR
Team-Captain: Falk
Team-Captain's Steam: u got me bruh
Normal Attendance: round bout 25 id say
Name : 18e Regiment d'Infanterie de Ligne
Team-Captain: John Price
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Chrisehh/
Normal Attendance: 20-25
Name : 72nd Seaforth's Highlanders
Team-Captain: DarkTemplar
Team-Captain's Steam: [72nd] DarkTemplar
Normal Attendance: 15-20
Name : K-KA
Team-Captain: Pride of Ni
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/proiddahero
Normal Attendance: 20-25
Name : 63e
Team-Captain: Munj
Team-Captain's Steam: [63e] Munj
Normal Attendance: 15-20
Name : 6te Garde-Grenadier Regiment
Team-Captain: Wüstenfuchs
Team-Captain's Steam: steamcommunity.com/id/wuestenfuchsger
Normal Attendance: about 20
Name :66.Peší pluk
Team-Captain: Salakien
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Salakien
Normal Attendance:20-25
Name : 44th Regiment of Foot "East Essex"
Team-Captain: Wolfster
Team-Captain's Steam: Here (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheRealWolfster/)
Normal Attendance: 20 - 25
Name : Garde Grenadier Regiment Nummer 4 Königin Augusta
Team-Captain: Beatz
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198054711224/
Normal Attendance: 20-25
Name : 44th Regiment of Foot "East Essex"
Team-Captain: Wolfster
Team-Captain's Steam: Here (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheRealWolfster/)
Normal Attendance: 20 - 25
Nah mate it's just meeemsName : 44th Regiment of Foot "East Essex"
Team-Captain: Wolfster
Team-Captain's Steam: Here (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheRealWolfster/)
Normal Attendance: 20 - 25
What you going to do in RGL "boycott the 94th"? xD
Name : 44th Regiment of Foot "East Essex"
Team-Captain: Wolfster
Team-Captain's Steam: Here (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheRealWolfster/)
Normal Attendance: 20 - 25
What you going to do in RGL "boycott the 94th"? xD
Looks like this year is gonna be wonderfully salty, wouldnt want it any better, ure all shit get gud at fukin Xx N0 5c0p3zZ xX k1dzWe win all matches?
ye dw i already have control over a few admins so i can gib u insta winLooks like this year is gonna be wonderfully salty, wouldnt want it any better, ure all shit get gud at fukin Xx N0 5c0p3zZ xX k1dzWe win all matches?
Name : Spartan Hoplites
Team-Captain: Zagi
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SpartanObi
Normal Attendance: 15-25
Name : 77y Pehotniy Polk
Team-Captain: 77y_Lt_Abekrampe
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Abekrampe/
Normal Attendance: 20~
Name : 94th Regiment of Foot
Team-Captain: Jeff McBiggie
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/jeffmcbiggie
Normal Attendance:20
"durability" --> accepts Dust's regiment banter m8With these 3 regiment we are completeSpoilerName : Spartan Hoplites
Team-Captain: Zagi
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SpartanObi
Normal Attendance: 15-25Name : 77y Pehotniy Polk
Team-Captain: 77y_Lt_Abekrampe
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Abekrampe/
Normal Attendance: 20~Name : 94th Regiment of Foot
Team-Captain: Jeff McBiggie
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/jeffmcbiggie
Normal Attendance:20[close]The decision has been made considering factors: First of all we looked at the regiments durability, then we looked at the time period it existed, and last we estimated the regiments performance in the league. The decision has been made, may it be a good season.
Name : 79e Regiment d'Infanterie de Ligne
Team-Captain: 79e_Col_Irish
Team-Captain's Steam: Irish (https://steamcommunity.com/id/IrishRangerGAME)
Normal Attendance: 20~
Name : 7th Finland Infantry Regiment
Team-Captain: Desant
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/desant228/
Normal Attendance: 15-20
"durability" --> accepts Dust's regiment banter m8With these 3 regiment we are completeSpoilerName : Spartan Hoplites
Team-Captain: Zagi
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SpartanObi
Normal Attendance: 15-25Name : 77y Pehotniy Polk
Team-Captain: 77y_Lt_Abekrampe
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Abekrampe/
Normal Attendance: 20~Name : 94th Regiment of Foot
Team-Captain: Jeff McBiggie
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/jeffmcbiggie
Normal Attendance:20[close]The decision has been made considering factors: First of all we looked at the regiments durability, then we looked at the time period it existed, and last we estimated the regiments performance in the league. The decision has been made, may it be a good season.
"durability" --> accepts Dust's regiment banter m8With these 3 regiment we are completeSpoilerName : Spartan Hoplites
Team-Captain: Zagi
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SpartanObi
Normal Attendance: 15-25Name : 77y Pehotniy Polk
Team-Captain: 77y_Lt_Abekrampe
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Abekrampe/
Normal Attendance: 20~Name : 94th Regiment of Foot
Team-Captain: Jeff McBiggie
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/jeffmcbiggie
Normal Attendance:20[close]The decision has been made considering factors: First of all we looked at the regiments durability, then we looked at the time period it existed, and last we estimated the regiments performance in the league. The decision has been made, may it be a good season.
In all fairness they usually last a few months, maybe it'll be just long enough to finish this season."durability" --> accepts Dust's regiment banter m8With these 3 regiment we are completeSpoilerName : Spartan Hoplites
Team-Captain: Zagi
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SpartanObi
Normal Attendance: 15-25Name : 77y Pehotniy Polk
Team-Captain: 77y_Lt_Abekrampe
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Abekrampe/
Normal Attendance: 20~Name : 94th Regiment of Foot
Team-Captain: Jeff McBiggie
Team-Captain's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/jeffmcbiggie
Normal Attendance:20[close]The decision has been made considering factors: First of all we looked at the regiments durability, then we looked at the time period it existed, and last we estimated the regiments performance in the league. The decision has been made, may it be a good season.
shots fired ayyy
When are you all going to chill out with arguing about reffs on a groupfight? They take time out of their day watching you guys play just to say "Ready? and Go"
But noooo they just have to be biased when saying 2 words
When are you all going to chill out with arguing about reffs on a groupfight? They take time out of their day watching you guys play just to say "Ready? and Go"
But noooo they just have to be biased when saying 2 words
"never change a running system"
Referee-Applications:ACCEPTED
Name: Von Bergen
Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Lukas007/
Experience: NWL Ref, Admin on several Servers with high attendance through the years, Hoster and Admin of an Big LB Event for more than a year
Why you want to be a Referee: As GGR Nr.4 will participate in this Tournament next Season its my pleasure to fullfill this Duty as the representative of my Regiment ;)
When do you have time: Cant really say that, depends on the week ;D
I was kinda hoping this would start the week after or something in all honesty. The 18e's leadership (and I mean all of it) is having a meetup in the low countries from the 23rd-31st.
Are we able to play that weeks match on the next mathcday?
Pluto, Haza, Lost Knight, Price, Tombenno, Burger, Conway, Will, Tiossem and Peppe are going ::)Poor kid.
Nock isnt quite leadership ::)
I was kinda hoping this would start the week after or something in all honesty. The 18e's leadership (and I mean all of it) is having a meetup in the low countries from the 23rd-31st.
Are we able to play that weeks match on the next mathcday?
Hopefully there are enough refs and hopefully all not from the same few regiments. Would be nice to have refs from regiments who aren't in to avoid some bias
Pluto, Haza, Lost Knight, Price, Tombenno, Burger, Conway, Will, Tiossem and Peppe are going ::)I'll lead together with chicken.
Nock isnt quite leadership ::)
Pluto, Haza, Lost Knight, Price, Tombenno, Burger, Conway, Will, Tiossem and Peppe are going ::)
Nock isnt quite leadership ::)
Pluto, Haza, Lost Knight, Price, Tombenno, Burger, Conway, Will, Tiossem and Peppe are going ::)
Nock isnt quite leadership ::)
Where's the Spartan Hoplites? Didnt they apply? :'(
I was kinda hoping this would start the week after or something in all honesty. The 18e's leadership (and I mean all of it) is having a meetup in the low countries from the 23rd-31st.
Are we able to play that weeks match on the next mathcday?
read the main post :P
No problem friend, I always like to help :)read the main post :P
Fucking hell, Alator told me you werent in the RGL and I didnt check. Sry my bad
Announce a match:
Who against Who:
Date:
Time:
Referee (If chosen):
Who against Who: 18e vs 63e
Date: 19th
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Not yet
Who against Who:72nd vs Spartans
Date: 24.7
Time:7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen):DarkTemplar
read the main post :P
Fucking hell, Alator told me you werent in the RGL and I didnt check. Sry my bad
Ross is not cool!QuoteAnnounce a match:
Who against Who:
Date:
Time:
Referee (If chosen):
This should be 'Who Against Whom'.
Who against Who: 18e vs 63e
Date: 20th
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Not yet
Who against Who: 18e vs 63e
Date: 20th
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Not yet
I put the wrong date fucking kek
In case you are on holiday with your regiment, make sure that you play every match that you will have skipped in the week you come back!!
Please don't go again, you won't come back for like 3 months.In case you are on holiday with your regiment, make sure that you play every match that you will have skipped in the week you come back!!
Yeah me and the regiment are off for a week away in Iraq so cya later
He meant 3 weeks sorry for the inconvenience Dust.Please don't go again, you won't come back for like 3 months.In case you are on holiday with your regiment, make sure that you play every match that you will have skipped in the week you come back!!
Yeah me and the regiment are off for a week away in Iraq so cya later
He meant 3 years sorry for the inconvenience Dust.Please don't go again, you won't come back for like 3 months.In case you are on holiday with your regiment, make sure that you play every match that you will have skipped in the week you come back!!
Yeah me and the regiment are off for a week away in Iraq so cya later
Who against Who: K-KA Vs 77y
Date: 26th
Time: 7pm
Referee (If chosen): need 1
Who against Who: K-KA Vs 77y
Date: 26th
Time: 7pm
Referee (If chosen): need 1
I can take it
Who against Who: K-KA Vs 77y
Date: 26th
Time: 7pm
Referee (If chosen): need 1
I can take it
SOLD
GG it was a tough match. Although we should have played alot better. Granted though that server gave me more aids than that shitty puppet song in Team America
GG it was a tough match. Although we should have played alot better. Granted though that server gave me more aids than that shitty puppet song in Team America
tru dat
GG it was a tough match.
Seriously though Rommel we got more pokes in that gf than I have had on Farmville in 5 years.
Seriously though Rommel we got more pokes in that gf than I have had on Farmville in 5 years.
I was a reff last 2 seasons I believe. Also so many German reffs. We need some Brexit up in here.
Name: Proice
Steam: Chrisehh
Experience: Multiple tournaments and groupfighting matches spanning 3 years as 18e. Lots of other shit nobody cares about
Why you want to be a Referee: The ability to reff matches whether they be others or my own just makes things a whole lot easier.
When do you have time: Always
Seriously though Rommel we got more pokes in that gf than I have had on Farmville in 5 years.
farmville was the shiz fam
Seriously though Rommel we got more pokes in that gf than I have had on Farmville in 5 years.
farmville was the shiz fam
+1 We lost because Penguin wasnt there.
Nock gets more triggered than Erdogan when he is groupfighting
+1 We lost because Penguin wasnt there.
77y and K-KA next. Stop giving me the hardest 3 first.
Nock gets more triggered than Erdogan when he is groupfighting
77y and K-KA next. Stop giving me the hardest 3 first.
Nock gets more triggered than Erdogan when he is groupfighting
We can call it a draw if we can make fun of nock for 45mins instead.
Wait you were there? I didnt even see you..No xD but you should of invited me fam I can carry ez pz
You said you were going to come sit in spec tbh famoh shit yeh I forgot to ask for info. Woops
18e vs 63e i demand a rematch
Tbf we were missing a few people as well. You are right doe Epic and Herishey would have rekt us
Not as sensible as Wolfster, he quit without even trying.
Tbf we were missing a few people as well. You are right doe Epic and Herishey would have rekt us
Excuses everywhere :P
Excuses everywhere :P
1v1 me on clubpenguin bo10
Excuses everywhere :P
Saxon's headset is rip and Maus cant play RGL
Nice meme!Saxon's headset is rip and Maus cant play RGL
Yeah sry I couldn't carry, my dick was stuck in my cpu fan ;)
Thanks dad.Tbf we were missing a few people as well. You are right doe Epic and Herishey would have rekt us
You are a sensible person Chriseh
Saxon's headset is rip and Maus cant play RGL
Who against Who: 63e vs GGR Nr4
Date: 31/7/16 (Sunday)
Time: 7PM
Referee (If chosen): Anyone who is available
Who against Who: 63e vs GGR Nr4
Date: 31/7/16 (Sunday)
Time: 7PM
Referee (If chosen): Anyone who is available
I'll take it m8.
Saxon's headset is rip and Maus cant play RGLYou know a regiment is bad when they class Maus as a key player
77y and K-KA next. Stop giving me the hardest 3 first.
Nock gets more triggered than Erdogan when he is groupfighting
Nock said it fam not meSaxon's headset is rip and Maus cant play RGLYou know a regiment is bad when they class Maus as a key player
did i say "key player" ? no lolNock said it fam not meSaxon's headset is rip and Maus cant play RGLYou know a regiment is bad when they class Maus as a key player
Yes you are crap Eddie, fakkkin noob.77y and K-KA next. Stop giving me the hardest 3 first.
Nock gets more triggered than Erdogan when he is groupfighting
Contrary to popular belief the 77y is actually crap. All of us.
77y isnt crap , they just dont have french no lifers thats all :D
Well Eddie, You shouldnt view yourself as the regiment's whole.77y and K-KA next. Stop giving me the hardest 3 first.
Nock gets more triggered than Erdogan when he is groupfighting
Contrary to popular belief the 77y is actually crap. All of us.
NOCK IS KEY PLAYUR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
77y isnt crap , they just dont have french no lifers thats all :D
i have 2k hours on m&b and been playing 5 years, am i a nolifer papa ?
77y isnt crap , they just dont have french no lifers thats all :D
i have 2k hours on m&b and been playing 5 years, am i a nolifer papa ?
NOCK IS KEY PLAYUR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-Nock Nock! ;D
Regiment Name: 88th Infantry Regiment
Expected attendance: 15-18
Prefered class (line, footguards or artillery): Cavalry or jagers pls
Did you read rules?: Yes.
Sign up for once or weekly? : Weekly
Steam leader name : https://steamcommunity.com/id/mlaket/
Damnit Munj you beat me to it :P
How does the rule regarding the ref going onto a ts to check if either regiment have invites get enforced? just wondering cus it seems our first 2 matches will be/have been reffed by a member of the opposite reg :p not saying any would use invites but im just wondering more out of interest
How does the rule regarding the ref going onto a ts to check if either regiment have invites get enforced? just wondering cus it seems our first 2 matches will be/have been reffed by a member of the opposite reg :p not saying any would use invites but im just wondering more out of interest
When you agree that a referee who is in the regiment of your opponent, you always have the risk that they might use invites. Of course you can go and look at the teamspeak yourself and if you bring evidence that they used invites in the match, the invite will be banned for the entire RGL Season and the referee will be kicked out of the referee staff, because we expect him to prevent any of the two regiment using invites. I recommend to you if you feel unsafe to take a referee that is not from the opposing regiment, even tho I don't think that that would be necessary.
Edit: If you play against a regiment that uses historical names you have the right to insist that the referee checks their teamspeak and/or check it yourself.
Thank you added to rules :)How does the rule regarding the ref going onto a ts to check if either regiment have invites get enforced? just wondering cus it seems our first 2 matches will be/have been reffed by a member of the opposite reg :p not saying any would use invites but im just wondering more out of interest
When you agree that a referee who is in the regiment of your opponent, you always have the risk that they might use invites. Of course you can go and look at the teamspeak yourself and if you bring evidence that they used invites in the match, the invite will be banned for the entire RGL Season and the referee will be kicked out of the referee staff, because we expect him to prevent any of the two regiment using invites. I recommend to you if you feel unsafe to take a referee that is not from the opposing regiment, even tho I don't think that that would be necessary.
Edit: If you play against a regiment that uses historical names you have the right to insist that the referee checks their teamspeak and/or check it yourself.
If a regiment uses invites both the regiment and the invite should be punished as both are aware that they are breaking the rules. I think it is only fair that if an invite is used, then they are disallowed from further participating in the RGL (as you suggested) but also the regiment who used the invite, should automatically lose the match in which they played the invite 0-20. That way there is a deterrent on both ends.
How does the rule regarding the ref going onto a ts to check if either regiment have invites get enforced? just wondering cus it seems our first 2 matches will be/have been reffed by a member of the opposite reg :p not saying any would use invites but im just wondering more out of interest
When you agree that a referee who is in the regiment of your opponent, you always have the risk that they might use invites. Of course you can go and look at the teamspeak yourself and if you bring evidence that they used invites in the match, the invite will be banned for the entire RGL Season and the referee will be kicked out of the referee staff, because we expect him to prevent any of the two regiment using invites. I recommend to you if you feel unsafe to take a referee that is not from the opposing regiment, even tho I don't think that that would be necessary.
Edit: If you play against a regiment that uses historical names you have the right to insist that the referee checks their teamspeak and/or check it yourself.
If a regiment uses invites both the regiment and the invite should be punished as both are aware that they are breaking the rules. I think it is only fair that if an invite is used, then they are disallowed from further participating in the RGL (as you suggested) but also the regiment who used the invite, should automatically lose the match in which they played the invite 0-20. That way there is a deterrent on both ends.
Obviously every case is different. It is our job to determine wether the regiment itself is responsible or not. As a former CO in a regiment who participated in those types of leagues before, I can say that it's pretty difficult to keep track of every member of the regiment. When the regiment knows about some of their people being invites and use them to get considerably large advantage over their enemy, they, of course, will be punished with an instant 0-20.
Agreed, it's really not hard seeing who of your guys is playing and unless someone deliberately takes the name of a member and plays under that name you should always know who is an invite and who not.Obviously every case is different. It is our job to determine wether the regiment itself is responsible or not. As a former CO in a regiment who participated in those types of leagues before, I can say that it's pretty difficult to keep track of every member of the regiment. When the regiment knows about some of their people being invites and use them to get considerably large advantage over their enemy, they, of course, will be punished with an instant 0-20.
With all due respect, when I'm leading in competitive matches, I know exactly who is in my TS channel and which of those members are in game. Invites don't 'accidently' get played. I really can't see a scenario in which the regiment leader would play an invite and not know that they were an invite. This should be a blanket rule, because by doing what you are suggest and allowing human error to play a role in the determined punishment which the regiment receives for using invites, you are essentially creating a loophole, which makes the whole rule null and void.
Agreed, it's really not hard seeing who of your guys is playing and unless someone deliberately takes the name of a member and plays under that name you should always know who is an invite and who not.Obviously every case is different. It is our job to determine wether the regiment itself is responsible or not. As a former CO in a regiment who participated in those types of leagues before, I can say that it's pretty difficult to keep track of every member of the regiment. When the regiment knows about some of their people being invites and use them to get considerably large advantage over their enemy, they, of course, will be punished with an instant 0-20.
With all due respect, when I'm leading in competitive matches, I know exactly who is in my TS channel and which of those members are in game. Invites don't 'accidently' get played. I really can't see a scenario in which the regiment leader would play an invite and not know that they were an invite. This should be a blanket rule, because by doing what you are suggest and allowing human error to play a role in the determined punishment which the regiment receives for using invites, you are essentially creating a loophole, which makes the whole rule null and void.
Agreed, it's really not hard seeing who of your guys is playing and unless someone deliberately takes the name of a member and plays under that name you should always know who is an invite and who not.Obviously every case is different. It is our job to determine wether the regiment itself is responsible or not. As a former CO in a regiment who participated in those types of leagues before, I can say that it's pretty difficult to keep track of every member of the regiment. When the regiment knows about some of their people being invites and use them to get considerably large advantage over their enemy, they, of course, will be punished with an instant 0-20.
With all due respect, when I'm leading in competitive matches, I know exactly who is in my TS channel and which of those members are in game. Invites don't 'accidently' get played. I really can't see a scenario in which the regiment leader would play an invite and not know that they were an invite. This should be a blanket rule, because by doing what you are suggest and allowing human error to play a role in the determined punishment which the regiment receives for using invites, you are essentially creating a loophole, which makes the whole rule null and void.
Invites yes...double reggers are a different situation.
Even if no would, you wouldnt find out about everytime when one of your guys is doubleregging in any Regiment, thats really hard to controll.
Even if no would, you wouldnt find out about everytime when one of your guys is doubleregging in any Regiment, thats really hard to controll.
Even if no would, you wouldnt find out about everytime when one of your guys is doubleregging in any Regiment, thats really hard to controll.
There are 12 regiments currently in the RGL. The 94th is disbanding (from what I understand, don't take my word on it, just what I've heard from some of their members) and several regiments, as part of their regimental guidelines, don't even allow double regging. This makes the option of having a player double regging for another regiment in the RGL, narrowed down to only a few regiments which they could double reg for. Therefore it would amaze me if the regiment leaders (from the two regiments involved) could not pinpoint which of their members are playing for another regiment in the RGL, either they are incompetent, or they are allowing it to happen. The chance of a regiment leader not knowing is extremely low and if such a leader feels that they would find it difficult to know who was double regging, then they should alter their regimental guidelines so as to prohibit double regging (at least for members which they use for competitive matches).
I don't think double-regging will be a major problem, seeing as the 94th is maybe disbanding in the near future and the fact that 17e is no longer in existence. ;)
I dont think Reservists are a Problem... As Long as they don't Play for 2 Regiments participating At RGL and aren't Invites it Is no Problem because at all they Are more or less retired Players (as I define Reservists) or players Who don't attend very often, but I don't See a Problem if they only Play for one Regiment in the RGL.
As this seems to be an issue the captains are complaining about, I had an Idea I've already told Rommel about, making some Lists for every Regiment participating. Where they give the names of the Players that Will probably Play the Whole Season (This System Is running for example at NWGFL, there even with the ID's). Changes (Leaving People new People etc) would be told to the organisers or Whoever Is in Charge of this. Would make it kinna easier for all, especially the referees, to avoid Invites. The Number of Players on this List could be limited to 25 or 30. Just an Idea. Wouldnt be that intense to Manage.
12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.
12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.
You want to do some kind of white list for RGL or list of player and monitoring them ? You dont know how to spend your time or what :D
I dont think Reservists are a Problem... As Long as they don't Play for 2 Regiments participating At RGL and aren't Invites it Is no Problem because at all they Are more or less retired Players (as I define Reservists) or players Who don't attend very often, but I don't See a Problem if they only Play for one Regiment in the RGL.
As this seems to be an issue the captains are complaining about, I had an Idea I've already told Rommel about, making some Lists for every Regiment participating. Where they give the names of the Players that Will probably Play the Whole Season (This System Is running for example at NWGFL, there even with the ID's). Changes (Leaving People new People etc) would be told to the organisers or Whoever Is in Charge of this. Would make it kinna easier for all, especially the referees, to avoid Invites. The Number of Players on this List could be limited to 25 or 30. Just an Idea. Wouldnt be that intense to Manage.
12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.
I dont think Reservists are a Problem... As Long as they don't Play for 2 Regiments participating At RGL and aren't Invites it Is no Problem because at all they Are more or less retired Players (as I define Reservists) or players Who don't attend very often, but I don't See a Problem if they only Play for one Regiment in the RGL.
As this seems to be an issue the captains are complaining about, I had an Idea I've already told Rommel about, making some Lists for every Regiment participating. Where they give the names of the Players that Will probably Play the Whole Season (This System Is running for example at NWGFL, there even with the ID's). Changes (Leaving People new People etc) would be told to the organisers or Whoever Is in Charge of this. Would make it kinna easier for all, especially the referees, to avoid Invites. The Number of Players on this List could be limited to 25 or 30. Just an Idea. Wouldnt be that intense to Manage.
12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.
Don't worry. If you save your breath I think a man of your stature can pull it off
I dont think Reservists are a Problem... As Long as they don't Play for 2 Regiments participating At RGL and aren't Invites it Is no Problem because at all they Are more or less retired Players (as I define Reservists) or players Who don't attend very often, but I don't See a Problem if they only Play for one Regiment in the RGL.
As this seems to be an issue the captains are complaining about, I had an Idea I've already told Rommel about, making some Lists for every Regiment participating. Where they give the names of the Players that Will probably Play the Whole Season (This System Is running for example at NWGFL, there even with the ID's). Changes (Leaving People new People etc) would be told to the organisers or Whoever Is in Charge of this. Would make it kinna easier for all, especially the referees, to avoid Invites. The Number of Players on this List could be limited to 25 or 30. Just an Idea. Wouldnt be that intense to Manage.
12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.
Don't worry. If you save your breath I think a man of your stature can pull it off
That probably sounded so cool in Swedish :'(
15-5 for 15th_YR against 72nddrama
gg, I blame auto-block but it's to late I think :(
Doesn't really show what skill your regiment has if you use invites... I agree with Chriseh... No invites7double reggers at all.
15-5 for 15th_YR against 72nd
gg, I blame auto-block but it's to late I think :(
15-5 for 15th_YR against 72nd
gg, I blame auto-block but it's to late I think :(
Doesn't really show what skill your regiment has if you use invites... I agree with Chriseh... No invites7double reggers at all.
15-5 for 15th_YR against 72nd
gg, I blame auto-block but it's to late I think :(
Damn they got us:/
But nice Fight against nice enemy's always again.
15-5 for 15th_YR against 72ndrussian inv + russian inv not to forget
gg, I blame russian inv but it's to late I think :(
15-5 for russian inv russian inv russian invrussian inv + russian inv russian inv
russian inv, russian inv russian inv russian inv :(
Since Dust quit life again, 44th will take their spot! All their matches will be replayed!
nobody is really surprisedSince Dust quit life again, 44th will take their spot! All their matches will be replayed!
Hate to say it but I told you so
nobody is really surprisedSince Dust quit life again, 44th will take their spot! All their matches will be replayed!
Hate to say it but I told you so
not my decision, i don't know why people don't pay the fuck attention to this phenomenonnobody is really surprisedSince Dust quit life again, 44th will take their spot! All their matches will be replayed!
Hate to say it but I told you so
But can we actually learn from it this time and not keep on letting him enter into all the competitive leagues just because he has a decent roster of invites and double reggers.
not my decision, i don't know why people don't pay the fuck attention to this phenomenonnobody is really surprisedSince Dust quit life again, 44th will take their spot! All their matches will be replayed!
Hate to say it but I told you so
But can we actually learn from it this time and not keep on letting him enter into all the competitive leagues just because he has a decent roster of invites and double reggers.
On the topic of double reggers, we have none who double for another RGL regiment, actually people who may have doubled for us in the past are A) Left or B) joined and i believe that we do not have as many as you'd like to think, i can't call any from the top of my head right now apart from 2 59th and a 2/3 68th, who commit just as much time to the 79e as they do the 68th.
On the topic of double reggers, we have none who double for another RGL regiment, actually people who may have doubled for us in the past are A) Left or B) joined and i believe that we do not have as many as you'd like to think, i can't call any from the top of my head right now apart from 2 59th and a 2/3 68th, who commit just as much time to the 79e as they do the 68th.
Perhaps in the future it should be more diplomatic and the league has a 'core' of regiments who are highly respected and/or the regiments classed as the main competitive group vote on whether to allow/disallow smaller regiments into rgl or regiments who have a history of internal problems. Might make it easier to have a more consistent season, yes it may create bias but most sports league adopt the same approach of getting it's members to vote on such matters that accept the league they are in
Perhaps in the future it should be more diplomatic and the league has a 'core' of regiments who are highly respected and/or the regiments classed as the main competitive group vote on whether to allow/disallow smaller regiments into rgl or regiments who have a history of internal problems. Might make it easier to have a more consistent season, yes it may create bias but most sports league adopt the same approach of getting it's members to vote on such matters that accept the league they are in
The regiment leaders had a vote, to decide whether they wanted the Spartans or the 94th in the league. The poll was a landslide in favour of allowing the Spartans in and excluding the 94th, but evidently the results were ignored. As I say, this isn't the first time that league organisers have been warned profusely about Dust and still go on to accept him under the pretext of 'making the most competitive league possible'. Well myself and other have said this in the past and say it now; there is no point accepting Dust's regiments simply because they have competitive players because they will always disband, it is inevitable, so in actuality all an organiser is doing is damaging their competition rather than making it more competitive. As I said, I hope organisers actually learn this time.
Perhaps in the future it should be more diplomatic and the league has a 'core' of regiments who are highly respected and/or the regiments classed as the main competitive group vote on whether to allow/disallow smaller regiments into rgl or regiments who have a history of internal problems. Might make it easier to have a more consistent season, yes it may create bias but most sports league adopt the same approach of getting it's members to vote on such matters that accept the league they are in
The regiment leaders had a vote, to decide whether they wanted the Spartans or the 94th in the league. The poll was a landslide in favour of allowing the Spartans in and excluding the 94th, but evidently the results were ignored. As I say, this isn't the first time that league organisers have been warned profusely about Dust and still go on to accept him under the pretext of 'making the most competitive league possible'. Well myself and other have said this in the past and say it now; there is no point accepting Dust's regiments simply because they have competitive players because they will always disband, it is inevitable, so in actuality all an organiser is doing is damaging their competition rather than making it more competitive. As I said, I hope organisers actually learn this time.
They weren't ignored, but 44th said they don't want anymore closely after the poll. The poll was about who will took the last place
So Spartans took the last place and 44th made a place then for 94th after leaving, because, honestly, Dust's Regiments live for at least some months and with a free spot I don't see a point why disallowing them to play, only because some don't like him/his regiments.
Trigger master DustDust more like kokot
I feel as though there should be a rule that would allow a regiment to say "Oh I don't really want you to bring 5+ double reggers that only attend RGL to this event".Then i couldn't attend for 18e
22nd more like dedoff topic! ban please?
It's probably worse if double reggers are in a comp and non-comp reg. It shows the reason why they are in their respective regiments, i.e. they are in the comp regiment for comp matches (so theyre more likely to only attend the comp matches of that regiment. Likewise they are in a non-comp, more relaxed regiment because they want to be in a regiment that is simply more about the regular, casual linebattles. Obviously this is all just a generalisation and doesn't apply to all double reggers, but how can we make an exception for some double reggers and not for others. It would be incredibly difficult to track every double regger and what regiments they are in, so as to ensure that they in those regiments for the right reasons.
Of course you would be okay with it you bring in carry players to....carry..
You kind of miss the point. We dont want double reggers playing in the RGL.
Who against Who: Spartans vs 79ei will take it
Date: 07-08-16
Time: 7gmt
Referee (If chosen): None
I have to agree with this statemant
Dust more like kokot
It's probably worse if double reggers are in a comp and non-comp reg. It shows the reason why they are in their respective regiments, i.e. they are in the comp regiment for comp matches (so theyre more likely to only attend the comp matches of that regiment. Likewise they are in a non-comp, more relaxed regiment because they want to be in a regiment that is simply more about the regular, casual linebattles. Obviously this is all just a generalisation and doesn't apply to all double reggers, but how can we make an exception for some double reggers and not for others? It would be incredibly difficult to track every double regger and what regiments they are in, so as to ensure that they in those regiments for the right reasons.And what is wrong with that? Real problem is people that invite for multiple regs in RGL.
Who against Who: 18e vs K-KA
Date: 07-08-16
Time: 7gmt
Referee (If chosen): None
It's probably worse if double reggers are in a comp and non-comp reg. It shows the reason why they are in their respective regiments, i.e. they are in the comp regiment for comp matches (so theyre more likely to only attend the comp matches of that regiment. Likewise they are in a non-comp, more relaxed regiment because they want to be in a regiment that is simply more about the regular, casual linebattles. Obviously this is all just a generalisation and doesn't apply to all double reggers, but how can we make an exception for some double reggers and not for others? It would be incredibly difficult to track every double regger and what regiments they are in, so as to ensure that they in those regiments for the right reasons.
Lone, I think you kind of dont understand the point he was making. His point is we cannot really decide who specifically plays that is a double regger or not. Thats why we are kind of campaigning for a rule that allows us to choose the use of them per event.Agree
The point I brought up was the double reggers the 79e was using. Pancake and Irish themselves said they even had 59th players there including Hypno. I mean Hypno is by no means the best player NW but he is enough to help make a difference right? Even if the 59th is not a RGL regiment they are still a competitive regiment playing multple 1v1's, groupfights and I suppose even 2v2's a week.
Lets take an example. We recently did a match vs K-KA where they had a couple of invites etc. there and I was rather upset about it. Me and Pride had a discussion afterwards about the subject and he agreed that them being there was absolutely pointless as they did not need them to win at all. They are leagues better than the 18e and the 18e should deserve as fair a chance as they joined the event for.
As for your point for "attendance"...Jesus christ if your regiment cannot bring 15 people to an event any day of the week then you should not be here, debatable even being a regiment still.
Oh and as for reffing yes pls :*
Lone, I think you kind of dont understand the point he was making. His point is we cannot really decide who specifically plays that is a double regger or not. Thats why we are kind of campaigning for a rule that allows us to choose the use of them per event.
The point I brought up was the double reggers the 79e was using. Pancake and Irish themselves said they even had 59th players there including Hypno. I mean Hypno is by no means the best player NW but he is enough to help make a difference right? Even if the 59th is not a RGL regiment they are still a competitive regiment playing multple 1v1's, groupfights and I suppose even 2v2's a week.
Lets take an example. We recently did a match vs K-KA where they had a couple of invites etc. there and I was rather upset about it. Me and Pride had a discussion afterwards about the subject and he agreed that them being there was absolutely pointless as they did not need them to win at all. They are leagues better than the 18e and the 18e should deserve as fair a chance as they joined the event for.
As for your point for "attendance"...Jesus christ if your regiment cannot bring 15 people to an event any day of the week then you should not be here, debatable even being a regiment still.
Oh and as for reffing yes pls :*
Nick: 18e Col | 45e SoD O.o
Joke :DLone, I think you kind of dont understand the point he was making. His point is we cannot really decide who specifically plays that is a double regger or not. Thats why we are kind of campaigning for a rule that allows us to choose the use of them per event.
The point I brought up was the double reggers the 79e was using. Pancake and Irish themselves said they even had 59th players there including Hypno. I mean Hypno is by no means the best player NW but he is enough to help make a difference right? Even if the 59th is not a RGL regiment they are still a competitive regiment playing multple 1v1's, groupfights and I suppose even 2v2's a week.
Lets take an example. We recently did a match vs K-KA where they had a couple of invites etc. there and I was rather upset about it. Me and Pride had a discussion afterwards about the subject and he agreed that them being there was absolutely pointless as they did not need them to win at all. They are leagues better than the 18e and the 18e should deserve as fair a chance as they joined the event for.
As for your point for "attendance"...Jesus christ if your regiment cannot bring 15 people to an event any day of the week then you should not be here, debatable even being a regiment still.
Oh and as for reffing yes pls :*
Well You're Right with the attendance Point.
However I think I understood pretty good what Your Point is, I just can't Really retrace it. If I get it Right you have a Problem if a Player Is at 2 Competetive Regiments?
Hypno Is best Nw for sure.
Let's Discuss this later or Even not, I just wanted to Point out that I don't agree with the basical refusing of Double regging. Bye
Who against Who: 66Pp vs 63egot that
Date: 10-08-16
Time: 7gmt
Referee (If chosen): Don't mind
Who against Who: 66Pp vs 63e
Date: 10-08-16
Time: 7gmt
Referee (If chosen): Don't mind
Who against Who: 66Pp vs 63egot that
Date: 10-08-16
Time: 7gmt
Referee (If chosen): Don't mind
i do it lolWho against Who: 66Pp vs 63e
Date: 10-08-16
Time: 7gmt
Referee (If chosen): Don't mind
I can probs do it if it's alright with dem kiddos.
Russian inv will save the league
Who against Who: 66Pp vs 63egot that
Date: 10-08-16
Time: 7gmt
Referee (If chosen): Don't mindi do it lolWho against Who: 66Pp vs 63e
Date: 10-08-16
Time: 7gmt
Referee (If chosen): Don't mind
I can probs do it if it's alright with dem kiddos.
Who against Who: 66Pp vs 63egot that
Date: 10-08-16
Time: 7gmt
Referee (If chosen): Don't mindi do it lolWho against Who: 66Pp vs 63e
Date: 10-08-16
Time: 7gmt
Referee (If chosen): Don't mind
I can probs do it if it's alright with dem kiddos.
You can both do it if you want. One of you can type 'r?' and the other one can say 'go' ;)
We have a couple here as SoH i.e Reserve who are SoH for competitive e.g Hypno, but mostly this is only a handful of people, rest of SoH being people who can't play very often or just only play comp with us and don't have another reg. If it's an issue it would only affect a very small minority in our case so whatever suits.Lol Hypno is in the 59th <3
We have a couple here as SoH i.e Reserve who are SoH for competitive e.g Hypno, but mostly this is only a handful of people, rest of SoH being people who can't play very often or just only play comp with us and don't have another reg. If it's an issue it would only affect a very small minority in our case so whatever suits.Lol Hypno is in the 59th <3
begs its just made simple, if you actively attend another regiment that is also a LINE regiment and you play events in it then you cant play RGL. How hard is it to grasp that if you are in RGL you are an ACTIVE member of that regiment and you attend more than just their competitive matches, this is meant to be a league to show the regiments melee skill not the players who only show for comps or are in the regiment just to play comps. I mean if 2 regiments agree to both use 'Reserves, Double reggers, Players who only come for comp' then thats not an issue as you are both still even grounds BUT if 1 leader disagrees then its simple, dont use them. Every regiment here has enough players to bring that are active members to their reg, even if you only bring 15 thats still 15 of YOUR regiments guys who play in all your events and thats the players the competition is meant to be testing, not billy from the netherlands who 'doesnt like regular events but will come if its RGL'.
Basically if you need to use part timers just to win an RGL match then boys your squad is weak #LegDay
begs its just made simple, if you actively attend another regiment that is also a LINE regiment and you play events in it then you cant play RGL. How hard is it to grasp that if you are in RGL you are an ACTIVE member of that regiment and you attend more than just their competitive matches, this is meant to be a league to show the regiments melee skill not the players who only show for comps or are in the regiment just to play comps. I mean if 2 regiments agree to both use 'Reserves, Double reggers, Players who only come for comp' then thats not an issue as you are both still even grounds BUT if 1 leader disagrees then its simple, dont use them. Every regiment here has enough players to bring that are active members to their reg, even if you only bring 15 thats still 15 of YOUR regiments guys who play in all your events and thats the players the competition is meant to be testing, not billy from the netherlands who 'doesnt like regular events but will come if its RGL'.
Basically if you need to use part timers just to win an RGL match then boys your squad is weak #LegDay
begs its just made simple, if you actively attend another regiment that is also a LINE regiment and you play events in it then you cant play RGL. How hard is it to grasp that if you are in RGL you are an ACTIVE member of that regiment and you attend more than just their competitive matches, this is meant to be a league to show the regiments melee skill not the players who only show for comps or are in the regiment just to play comps. I mean if 2 regiments agree to both use 'Reserves, Double reggers, Players who only come for comp' then thats not an issue as you are both still even grounds BUT if 1 leader disagrees then its simple, dont use them. Every regiment here has enough players to bring that are active members to their reg, even if you only bring 15 thats still 15 of YOUR regiments guys who play in all your events and thats the players the competition is meant to be testing, not billy from the netherlands who 'doesnt like regular events but will come if its RGL'.
Basically if you need to use part timers just to win an RGL match then boys your squad is weak #LegDay
Dont use Reserves and double reggers in the same sentence its two completely different phenomenons.I don't think they are 'phenomenons' lol. I never claimed they were the same thing anyway, I claimed that it's the same principle. If we can't run on basic principles then why do we bother
Quote from: CarolusrexDont use Reserves and double reggers in the same sentence its two completely different phenomenons.I don't think they are 'phenomenons' lol. I never claimed they were the same thing anyway, I claimed that it's the same principle. If we can't run on basic principles then why do we bother
This comes back to the point I said earlier. I don't get why people can't be in a competitive and a non-competitive regiment? They do completely different events and they have a different atmosphere. People complain about regiments that have good players from non-competitive regiments and use them just because that regiment allows that sort of double regging and others don't.
Double regging on the other hand is inexcusable. In this case double reggers are evidently active enough in the game to keep up with activity in more than one regiment however they have chosen to only go to competitive events in one regiment and spend the rest of their time in other more casual regiments. So unlike the reserves they have the choice to be an active part of the competitive regiments' community and have turned it down for another regiment.Let's take Kore for example he could attend all 77y events but he only attends RGL. So that's kinda falls fam both have choice.
I don't understand what is difference between someone who attend only RGL in his only regiment and someone who attends only RGL for one regiment and attends events in more relaxed and fun regiment. Why do I have to listen to some sweatytryhard inbred Price voice entire week so just that I can attend RGL?
Double regging on the other hand is inexcusable. In this case double reggers are evidently active enough in the game to keep up with activity in more than one regiment however they have chosen to only go to competitive events in one regiment and spend the rest of their time in other more casual regiments. So unlike the reserves they have the choice to be an active part of the competitive regiments' community and have turned it down for another regiment.Let's take Kore for example he could attend all 77y events but he only attends RGL. So that's kinda falls fam both have choice.
Okaj Munjit disallowe double regging of any kind apparently even inviting is double regging ... now prove it. While you can prove double regging for 2 regiments in RGL you can't prove rest.
At all, if Double regging Is good or not, you wouldnt be able to realise your plan. We have 14 Regiments with each Let's take the minimum 15 participating Members. Makes 210 Members, Where you Would have to Check. If you Want to do that, much fun with that. Attending at 2 RGL-Regiments: Definitely no, being at a RGL-Reg and another: clearly yes. The Morale aspect Is up to the Players or leaders at all, not to any League.
Have there Been Problems with that at any NWL? As far As I Know not.
It's pretty simple you can't prove double regging unless it's for two regiments in RGL.Okaj Munjit disallowe double regging of any kind apparently even inviting is double regging ... now prove it. While you can prove double regging for 2 regiments in RGL you can't prove rest.
Not entirely sure what you mean by this. It isn't really coherent English...
It's pretty simple you can't prove double regging unless it's for two regiments in RGL.Okaj Munjit disallowe double regging of any kind apparently even inviting is double regging ... now prove it. While you can prove double regging for 2 regiments in RGL you can't prove rest.
Not entirely sure what you mean by this. It isn't really coherent English...
suggest that a regiment leader would be unaware that one of their members is double regging is unrealisticIt's realistic can be done pretty easily.
suggest that a regiment leader would be unaware that one of their members is double regging is unrealisticIt's realistic can be done pretty easily.
You join one regiment that doesn't allows double regging and join another and ask leader to help you be unrevealed so you use different nick name, don't join steamgroup and you are offline on steam when you play. So I guess it's not that easy for regiment leaders. Well what would be point of discussing it in private since non of us have any power to make changes to RGL rules, let's present arguments here so RGL organizers can make a decision. This here is useful arguing while in private would be 100% useless, unless of course you just want to prove a point, so I'm guessing you since you suggested to speak on steam.suggest that a regiment leader would be unaware that one of their members is double regging is unrealisticIt's realistic can be done pretty easily.
Not really, you'd have to be fairly incompetent not to find out (regiments which currently don't allow double regging manage to enforce the rule fine so I don't see why other regiments can't). Besides if the rule was implemented double reggers or people considering it would be more likely not to bother going ahead with it, due to the fact that they would be excluded from playing in the RGL. Anyways srsly I'm done with this topic, points have been exhausted. If you want to continue it speak to me on steam.
You join one regiment that doesn't allows double regging and join another and ask leader to help you be unrevealed so you use different nick name, don't join steamgroup and you are offline on steam when you play. So I guess it's not that easy for regiment leaders. Well what would be point of discussing it in private since non of us have any power to make changes to RGL rules, let's present arguments here so RGL organizers can make a decision. This here is useful arguing while in private would be 100% useless, unless of course you just want to prove a point, so I'm guessing you since you suggested to speak on steam.suggest that a regiment leader would be unaware that one of their members is double regging is unrealisticIt's realistic can be done pretty easily.
Not really, you'd have to be fairly incompetent not to find out (regiments which currently don't allow double regging manage to enforce the rule fine so I don't see why other regiments can't). Besides if the rule was implemented double reggers or people considering it would be more likely not to bother going ahead with it, due to the fact that they would be excluded from playing in the RGL. Anyways srsly I'm done with this topic, points have been exhausted. If you want to continue it speak to me on steam.
You know only when you catch a double regger not when he gets away with it. So how would you or anyone else know how good are 63e and even all the regiments in league that disallow double regging at enforcing that rule. Since you claim you know how well they do at it tell me which regiments disallow double regging in this league? And even if you know 63e and those regiments you are talking about are really good at it not all regiments are so succesful, some might know they have double reggers and won't care. And what does effort of double regger to stay unrevealed has anything to do with what we are talking about. I'm saying this rule can't be executed properly so it shouldn't be there at all.You join one regiment that doesn't allows double regging and join another and ask leader to help you be unrevealed so you use different nick name, don't join steamgroup and you are offline on steam when you play. So I guess it's not that easy for regiment leaders. Well what would be point of discussing it in private since non of us have any power to make changes to RGL rules, let's present arguments here so RGL organizers can make a decision. This here is useful arguing while in private would be 100% useless, unless of course you just want to prove a point, so I'm guessing you since you suggested to speak on steam.suggest that a regiment leader would be unaware that one of their members is double regging is unrealisticIt's realistic can be done pretty easily.
Not really, you'd have to be fairly incompetent not to find out (regiments which currently don't allow double regging manage to enforce the rule fine so I don't see why other regiments can't). Besides if the rule was implemented double reggers or people considering it would be more likely not to bother going ahead with it, due to the fact that they would be excluded from playing in the RGL. Anyways srsly I'm done with this topic, points have been exhausted. If you want to continue it speak to me on steam.
With all due respect, take the 63e as an example. The EU side has an average of 40-50 active members (I.e. The average attendance we get per event). Yet in all the time that I have been in the reg we have never let a double regger get past us, simply because we are vigilant and have an organised system. Also with regards to you suggestion, someone can do what you're suggesting but it's more effort for them than us and ultimately rules or laws in anything will be broken but the amount of effort one has to go through when a rule makes something illegal, compared to the effort one puts in if the action is legal, acts as a deterrent from double regging as it is.
You know only when you catch a double regger not when he gets away with it. So how would you or anyone else know how good are 63e and even all the regiments in league that disallow double regging at enforcing that rule. Since you claim you know how well they do at it tell me which regiments disallow double regging in this league? And even if you know 63e and those regiments you are talking about are really good at it not all regiments are so succesful, some might know they have double reggers and won't care. And what does effort of double regger to stay unrevealed has anything to do with what we are talking about. I'm saying this rule can't be executed properly so it shouldn't be there at all.You join one regiment that doesn't allows double regging and join another and ask leader to help you be unrevealed so you use different nick name, don't join steamgroup and you are offline on steam when you play. So I guess it's not that easy for regiment leaders. Well what would be point of discussing it in private since non of us have any power to make changes to RGL rules, let's present arguments here so RGL organizers can make a decision. This here is useful arguing while in private would be 100% useless, unless of course you just want to prove a point, so I'm guessing you since you suggested to speak on steam.suggest that a regiment leader would be unaware that one of their members is double regging is unrealisticIt's realistic can be done pretty easily.
Not really, you'd have to be fairly incompetent not to find out (regiments which currently don't allow double regging manage to enforce the rule fine so I don't see why other regiments can't). Besides if the rule was implemented double reggers or people considering it would be more likely not to bother going ahead with it, due to the fact that they would be excluded from playing in the RGL. Anyways srsly I'm done with this topic, points have been exhausted. If you want to continue it speak to me on steam.
With all due respect, take the 63e as an example. The EU side has an average of 40-50 active members (I.e. The average attendance we get per event). Yet in all the time that I have been in the reg we have never let a double regger get past us, simply because we are vigilant and have an organised system. Also with regards to you suggestion, someone can do what you're suggesting but it's more effort for them than us and ultimately rules or laws in anything will be broken but the amount of effort one has to go through when a rule makes something illegal, compared to the effort one puts in if the action is legal, acts as a deterrent from double regging as it is.
You know only when you catch a double regger not when he gets away with it. So how would you or anyone else know how good are 63e and even all the regiments in league that disallow double regging at enforcing that rule. Since you claim you know how well they do at it tell me which regiments disallow double regging in this league? And even if you know 63e and those regiments you are talking about are really good at it not all regiments are so succesful, some might know they have double reggers and won't care. And what does effort of double regger to stay unrevealed has anything to do with what we are talking about. I'm saying this rule can't be executed properly so it shouldn't be there at all.You join one regiment that doesn't allows double regging and join another and ask leader to help you be unrevealed so you use different nick name, don't join steamgroup and you are offline on steam when you play. So I guess it's not that easy for regiment leaders. Well what would be point of discussing it in private since non of us have any power to make changes to RGL rules, let's present arguments here so RGL organizers can make a decision. This here is useful arguing while in private would be 100% useless, unless of course you just want to prove a point, so I'm guessing you since you suggested to speak on steam.suggest that a regiment leader would be unaware that one of their members is double regging is unrealisticIt's realistic can be done pretty easily.
Not really, you'd have to be fairly incompetent not to find out (regiments which currently don't allow double regging manage to enforce the rule fine so I don't see why other regiments can't). Besides if the rule was implemented double reggers or people considering it would be more likely not to bother going ahead with it, due to the fact that they would be excluded from playing in the RGL. Anyways srsly I'm done with this topic, points have been exhausted. If you want to continue it speak to me on steam.
With all due respect, take the 63e as an example. The EU side has an average of 40-50 active members (I.e. The average attendance we get per event). Yet in all the time that I have been in the reg we have never let a double regger get past us, simply because we are vigilant and have an organised system. Also with regards to you suggestion, someone can do what you're suggesting but it's more effort for them than us and ultimately rules or laws in anything will be broken but the amount of effort one has to go through when a rule makes something illegal, compared to the effort one puts in if the action is legal, acts as a deterrent from double regging as it is.
Your whole argument therefore manifests on the concept that if a rule/law can't be enforced fully then it shouldn't be implemented at all. By that logic all rules/laws shouldn't even be an entity. For example, countries introduce harsh laws against narcotics trafficking, distribution and use, in order to try and prohibit the prevailence of narcotics in society. Criminals always find a way to 'stay unrevealed' and continue distributing and trafficking narcotics, at the end of the day, the government of that country can't find out about and imprison every single criminal involved, it would be virtually impossible. Does this mean we should remove all narcotic prohibition laws simply because a few people are able to get away with it? In the same way, should we not implement a rule, that would prohibit unfair practice (I.e. Double regging) simply because a minority of individuals may still be able to go unnoticed? Your logic is flawed.
Who against Who: 63e vs Spartans
Date: 14/8/16 (Sunday)
Time: 7PM
Referee (If chosen): Don't mind
I won`t be able to Ref the Match of KKA and 18e tomorrow. Hopefully somebody else can take it.
I won`t be able to Ref the Match of KKA and 18e tomorrow. Hopefully somebody else can take it.
I can ref it if it's alright then ;)
You can always trust mousse to nolifeI won`t be able to Ref the Match of KKA and 18e tomorrow. Hopefully somebody else can take it.
I can ref it if it's alright then ;)
Thanks fam. Didn`t had on plan that I have Match myself xd
It was a very good match thank you very much sirs :)
It was a very good match thank you very much sirs :)
was tough !!1!
It was a very good match thank you very much sirs :)
was tough !!1!
t'es salé ? :-*
Well i wasnt there so it makes sense and nock wasnt playing for 5 days omg just memed on forums.
K-KA 20-0 18e
gg
K-KA 20-0 18e
gg
Sorry about not being present when I said I could ref, but shit occured and I couldn't be on for today. =/
Thanks for reffing in my stead though.
10-10 Spartans-79eindeed :)
Really strong match.
Was a very good match Spartans :)
Ahu! Ahu!Was a very good match Spartans :)
Very enjoyable and intense :)
Another one bites the dust !ayyy
Another one bites the dust !ayyy
63e vs 66Pp - 4 : 16
Ref : Salakien and Frittentime
Autoblock was just to much for 63e63e vs 66Pp - 4 : 16
Ref : Salakien and Frittentime
Rip 63 :'( :'(
Autoblock was just to much for 63e63e vs 66Pp - 4 : 16
Ref : Salakien and Frittentime
Rip 63 :'( :'(
Autoblock was just to much for 63e63e vs 66Pp - 4 : 16
Ref : Salakien and Frittentime
Rip 63 :'( :'(
Nah it's cos their Twerk Leader Kim Kardashian Munj wasn't there ;)
Autoblock was just to much for 63e63e vs 66Pp - 4 : 16
Ref : Salakien and Frittentime
Rip 63 :'( :'(
Nah it's cos their Great Leader Kim Jong Munj wasn't there ;)
Autoblock was just to much for 63e63e vs 66Pp - 4 : 16
Ref : Salakien and Frittentime
Rip 63 :'( :'(
Nah it's cos their Great Leader Kim Jong Munj wasn't there ;)
L4ck1ng th3 sw3d35 ;)
Autoblock was just to much for 63e63e vs 66Pp - 4 : 16
Ref : Salakien and Frittentime
Rip 63 :'( :'(
Nah it's cos their Great Leader Kim Jong Munj wasn't there ;)
L4ck1ng th3 sw3d35 ;)
Lacking everyone for this one it seems ::)
Rip le NWL lineDon't gloat, you snussfiend ;)
15thYR 19-1 44th
Ref: Myself. Well played to both sides.
Futures Matches:
15th_YR vs 6te, 14/08-16 at 7 pm UK time, Ref: Either me or wusten or someone.
15th_YR vs 79e, 21/08-16 at 7 pm UK time, Ref: Either me or someone else.
Rip le NWL lineDon't gloat, you snussfiend ;)
Yeah i am on holiday and i just realized that 44th is gone. Ill search for a regiment that is up for joining when i am back.
Yeah i am on holiday and i just realized that 44th is gone. Ill search for a regiment that is up for joining when i am back.
If that is the case then I'd like to state that whatever regiment joins will have to keep the score we have against 44th, considering this is the second match against the same "regiment" since 94th disbanded right after our match with them, and now the same occurs again. And that already fucked up our present schedule so having to redo it a third time would be retarded.
Though I hope 44th still remains in the RGL with their new name as I heard they were having a name change rather than just disbanding.
aand sold.
Who against Who: 18e vs 77y
Date: 14/08
Time: 7GMT
Referee (If chosen): Lone?
Who against Who: 18e vs Nr12 (44th)
Date: 20/08
Time: 7GMT
Referee (If chosen): anyone
Who against Who: 18e vs GGR_Nr4
Date: 21/08
Time: 7GMT
Referee (If chosen): anyone
Why do we need to replace them, its just going to end up being another dodgy regiment that doesnt stay long enough. Personally id just close the spot and carry on with the league, 1 less match people need to worry about and hopefully prevents any further shit that every tournament seems to go through #Brexit #ClosetheBorders
Why do we need to replace them, its just going to end up being another dodgy regiment that doesnt stay long enough. Personally id just close the spot and carry on with the league, 1 less match people need to worry about and hopefully prevents any further shit that every tournament seems to go through #Brexit #ClosetheBorders
They really need to start setting criteria for these regiments joining league, amongst which longevity, stability and the nature of a regiment should be assessed.
How would those criteria be assessed? ???
its just the 44th but renamed. I dont see why they wouldnt be allowed to.
its just the 44th but renamed. I dont see why they wouldnt be allowed to.
KarthHow would those criteria be assessed? ???
How would those criteria be assessed? ???
How would those criteria be assessed? ???
How would those criteria be assessed? ???
Well longevity is quite simple. You would set a bar of how long a regiment has been around for before they sign up (I think somewhere between 4-6 months is fair enough). Stability is slightly more subjective but I'm sure the organisers could come to a consensus on the stability of a regiment by seeing what sort of NCO/CO staff are in the regiment (I.e. are they people who have a history in the game of either being part of or carrying out splits in previous regiments, or when assessing the reg leader, seeing whether they have a history of disbanding or creating multiple regiments. Finally in terms of the nature of the regiment, once again it is mostly subjective but the organisers should again collectively assess how each of them feels about the regiment that is being assessed, relevant information like whether theyve ever seen the regiment being annoying trolls, or for example if the regiment signed up to one of the organisers other events and then decided not o show up once or twice. Again other than the longevity part everything else is mostly subjective but the organisers are competent and for the most part logical so I don't see why they could apply a basic criteria on leagues like this. I mean most of it is just common sense.
You got a point there, but i think you should consider that some regimental leaders are pretty fucked up people but created regiments that achieved high results in nwFalk for example
You got a point there, but i think you should consider that some regimental leaders are pretty fucked up people but created regiments that achieved high results in nw
???
Hahaha gt love mauriceHow would those criteria be assessed? ???
Well longevity is quite simple. You would set a bar of how long a regiment has been around for before they sign up (I think somewhere between 4-6 months is fair enough). Stability is slightly more subjective but I'm sure the organisers could come to a consensus on the stability of a regiment by seeing what sort of NCO/CO staff are in the regiment (I.e. are they people who have a history in the game of either being part of or carrying out splits in previous regiments, or when assessing the reg leader, seeing whether they have a history of disbanding or creating multiple regiments. Finally in terms of the nature of the regiment, once again it is mostly subjective but the organisers should again collectively assess how each of them feels about the regiment that is being assessed, relevant information like whether theyve ever seen the regiment being annoying trolls, or for example if the regiment signed up to one of the organisers other events and then decided not o show up once or twice. Again other than the longevity part everything else is mostly subjective but the organisers are competent and for the most part logical so I don't see why they could apply a basic criteria on leagues like this. I mean most of it is just common sense.
I would say that the longer a regiment has been around the more likely it is to disband, which is true at least in the state of NW today. The rest is just purely personal and based on the organisers opinion of the regiment in question and I think with the amount that the community has shrunk, we shouldn't be looking to exclude regiments but instead give them a chance and encourage more involvement because the whole community is becoming the same old tired faces at the moment. It's not even pretty faces either, it's people like Pride, Tardet, Bob, Nock, Bashy, Kore, Obelix/Zagi, Dust, Movement, USE4life, ExoticFail, Odysseus, you, Chriseh, DarkTemplar whom at most have mediocre faces. We should seek to get more attractive and possibly even funny members of the community to replace these charlatans and to aid in this quest we should relax the entry requirements for tournaments such as these.
Thank you for reading.
Your beloved,
Maurice xx
Who against Who:K-KA vs GGR Nr4
Date: 14/08
Time: 7GMT
Referee (If chosen): anyone
Hahaha gt love mauriceHow would those criteria be assessed? ???
Well longevity is quite simple. You would set a bar of how long a regiment has been around for before they sign up (I think somewhere between 4-6 months is fair enough). Stability is slightly more subjective but I'm sure the organisers could come to a consensus on the stability of a regiment by seeing what sort of NCO/CO staff are in the regiment (I.e. are they people who have a history in the game of either being part of or carrying out splits in previous regiments, or when assessing the reg leader, seeing whether they have a history of disbanding or creating multiple regiments. Finally in terms of the nature of the regiment, once again it is mostly subjective but the organisers should again collectively assess how each of them feels about the regiment that is being assessed, relevant information like whether theyve ever seen the regiment being annoying trolls, or for example if the regiment signed up to one of the organisers other events and then decided not o show up once or twice. Again other than the longevity part everything else is mostly subjective but the organisers are competent and for the most part logical so I don't see why they could apply a basic criteria on leagues like this. I mean most of it is just common sense.
I would say that the longer a regiment has been around the more likely it is to disband, which is true at least in the state of NW today. The rest is just purely personal and based on the organisers opinion of the regiment in question and I think with the amount that the community has shrunk, we shouldn't be looking to exclude regiments but instead give them a chance and encourage more involvement because the whole community is becoming the same old tired faces at the moment. It's not even pretty faces either, it's people like Pride, Tardet, Bob, Nock, Bashy, Kore, Obelix/Zagi, Dust, Movement, USE4life, ExoticFail, Odysseus, you, Chriseh, DarkTemplar whom at most have mediocre faces. We should seek to get more attractive and possibly even funny members of the community to replace these charlatans and to aid in this quest we should relax the entry requirements for tournaments such as these.
Thank you for reading.
Your beloved,
Maurice xx
How would those criteria be assessed? ???
Well longevity is quite simple. You would set a bar of how long a regiment has been around for before they sign up (I think somewhere between 4-6 months is fair enough). Stability is slightly more subjective but I'm sure the organisers could come to a consensus on the stability of a regiment by seeing what sort of NCO/CO staff are in the regiment (I.e. are they people who have a history in the game of either being part of or carrying out splits in previous regiments, or when assessing the reg leader, seeing whether they have a history of disbanding or creating multiple regiments. Finally in terms of the nature of the regiment, once again it is mostly subjective but the organisers should again collectively assess how each of them feels about the regiment that is being assessed, relevant information like whether theyve ever seen the regiment being annoying trolls, or for example if the regiment signed up to one of the organisers other events and then decided not o show up once or twice. Again other than the longevity part everything else is mostly subjective but the organisers are competent and for the most part logical so I don't see why they could apply a basic criteria on leagues like this. I mean most of it is just common sense.
I would say that the longer a regiment has been around the more likely it is to disband, which is true at least in the state of NW today. The rest is just purely personal and based on the organisers opinion of the regiment in question and I think with the amount that the community has shrunk, we shouldn't be looking to exclude regiments but instead give them a chance and encourage more involvement because the whole community is becoming the same old tired faces at the moment. It's not even pretty faces either, it's people like Pride, Tardet, Bob, Nock, Bashy, Kore, Obelix/Zagi, Dust, Movement, USE4life, ExoticFail, Odysseus, you, Chriseh, DarkTemplar whom at most have mediocre faces. We should seek to get more attractive and possibly even funny members of the community to replace these charlatans and to aid in this quest we should relax the entry requirements for tournaments such as these.
Thank you for reading.
Your beloved,
Maurice xx
polllllllllllllll
So because there are alrdy 3 RGL's sunday we'll do our match before the others:
Who against Who:K-KA vs GGR Nr4
Date: 14/08
Time: 6.15pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Still need ref!Who against Who:K-KA vs GGR Nr4
Date: 14/08
Time: 7GMT
Referee (If chosen): anyone
Just don't do the league all problems solved. Community is so shit it can't provide few regiments that are interested in competitive aspect of the game or be stable to survivie one league, si better just don't do any long term leagues.
Just don't do the league all problems solved. Community is so shit it can't provide few regiments that are interested in competitive aspect of the game or be stable to survivie one league, si better just don't do any long term leagues.
Then leave so community becomes less shitty ples
Just don't do the league all problems solved. Community is so shit it can't provide few regiments that are interested in competitive aspect of the game or be stable to survivie one league, si better just don't do any long term leagues.
Then leave so community becomes less shitty ples
He is right, NW is pointless.gib dis man a kuki
CancerWhere?
Let's be honest regardless of the results the real winners are the government's running our countries. They keep us inside playing this shit game and making us fight against each other, this isn't a test of skill it's a test to find the most cancer players to create an international army intended to throw the population into slavery. Don't let this happen!!!!!¡¡¡¿ #NewWorldOrderAnarchism is the only way
Thanks for the match GGRNever forget Court Autist title.
& cheers Mussolini for refereeing and putting up with my autism
79e is continuing RGL as 17e now so yeah
we're really bad at melee and overall a shit regiment
First half was fairly even most of the time its just we dont have the good players to spread amongst the line but gg was fun goobsYep even the first round ending in a 1v1 was a good indication of how the game was for the first half.
Let's be honest regardless of the results the real winners are the government's running our countries. They keep us inside playing this shit game and making us fight against each other, this isn't a test of skill it's a test to find the most cancer players to create an international army intended to throw the population into slavery. Don't let this happen!!!!!¡¡¡¿ #NewWorldOrderAnarchism is the only way
xddddddddddddddddddddddd79e is continuing RGL as 17e now so yeah
more like 79e + Pieter xd
Let's be honest regardless of the results the real winners are the government's running our countries. They keep us inside playing this shit game and making us fight against each other, this isn't a test of skill it's a test to find the most cancer players to create an international army intended to throw the population into slavery. Don't let this happen!!!!!¡¡¡¿ #NewWorldOrderAnarchism is the only way
Nah facisme is our way out of this.
before 17e/79e play can we get a roster of them?Can I refuse to play them because Pieter might touch me?
before 17e/79e play can we get a roster of them?Gotta rebuild first
Darktemplar isn't an organizer, I am. Pls stop writing him. Look at the main post m8s xD
Darktemplar isn't an organizer, I am. Pls stop writing him. Look at the main post m8s xD
That's kinda kek, I felt so important :'(
wow, ruuuudeDarktemplar isn't an organizer, I am. Pls stop writing him. Look at the main post m8s xD
That's kinda kek, I felt so important :'(
Shut up bitch
Nr12 have already said they will carry on the matches
Right so I asked Nr12 if our match was still on this Friday and they told me that like 2 of their players left so they dont want to play anymore.Top. Kek.
Fuck Nock left 18e I should stop playing RGL
Due to current circumstances in the 63e EU, the NCOs and myself have taken a decision to pull out of the RGL this season. Our main reason for leaving is due to the rather spontaneous migration of our competitive RGL team to other regiments, which has led us to believe that it would be futile to persist in this league and instead begin to regrow our competitive team for the upcoming NWL Season 8. This was an unpredictable turn of events that I didn't fully factor in before signing up to the RGL this time round and I apologise for the regiments which will be effected by this withdrawal. None the less it is happening and I wish the best of luck to the remaining regiments which are participating.
I would appreciate if this message wasn't met with buckets of salt. This was meant to be informative and not something which I would like to discuss on forums.
Nr12 have already said they will carry on the matches
Nvm, already fixed. But concerning 79e, 17e took their spot right? Just so I know who we're actually playing this week for RGL as we had already set a date with 79e for this sunday at 7 pm UK time.
Due to current circumstances in the 63e EU, the NCOs and myself have taken a decision to pull out of the RGL this season. Our main reason for leaving is due to the rather spontaneous migration of our competitive RGL team to other regiments, which has led us to believe that it would be futile to persist in this league and instead begin to regrow our competitive team for the upcoming NWL Season 8. This was an unpredictable turn of events that I didn't fully factor in before signing up to the RGL this time round and I apologise for the regiments which will be effected by this withdrawal. None the less it is happening and I wish the best of luck to the remaining regiments which are participating.
I would appreciate if this message wasn't met with buckets of salt. This was meant to be informative and not something which I would like to discuss on forums.
Why do we need to replace them, its just going to end up being another dodgy regiment that doesnt stay long enough. Personally id just close the spot and carry on with the league, 1 less match people need to worry about and hopefully prevents any further shit that every tournament seems to go through #Brexit #ClosetheBorders
They really need to start setting criteria for these regiments joining league, amongst which longevity, stability and the nature of a regiment should be assessed.
Due to current circumstances in the 63e EU, the NCOs and myself have taken a decision to pull out of the RGL this season. Our main reason for leaving is due to the rather spontaneous migration of our competitive RGL team to other regiments, which has led us to believe that it would be futile to persist in this league and instead begin to regrow our competitive team for the upcoming NWL Season 8. This was an unpredictable turn of events that I didn't fully factor in before signing up to the RGL this time round and I apologise for the regiments which will be effected by this withdrawal. None the less it is happening and I wish the best of luck to the remaining regiments which are participating.
I would appreciate if this message wasn't met with buckets of salt. This was meant to be informative and not something which I would like to discuss on forums.
Good luck 63e. Its a shame you are leaving this comp as you are one of the very few regs that can be counted on to not disband
Good luck 63e. Its a shame you are leaving this comp as you are one of the very few regs that can be counted on to not disband
Due to current circumstances in the 63e EU, the NCOs and myself have taken a decision to pull out of the RGL this season. Our main reason for leaving is due to the rather spontaneous migration of our competitive RGL team to other regiments, which has led us to believe that it would be futile to persist in this league and instead begin to regrow our competitive team for the upcoming NWL Season 8. This was an unpredictable turn of events that I didn't fully factor in before signing up to the RGL this time round and I apologise for the regiments which will be effected by this withdrawal. None the less it is happening and I wish the best of luck to the remaining regiments which are participating.It's very sad to read that, you were one of the few regiments of which I didn' expect something like this to happen. It happened anyway so we have to role with it. I hereby encourage every regiment in the league to stay no matter what outcomes you get and I really hope we can finish this season without anymore disbands and leaves. I respect 63e's decision regardless. Since the Nr12 doesn't want to carry on with the RGL, I hope we can finish this season with 10 regiments.
I would appreciate if this message wasn't met with buckets of salt. This was meant to be informative and not something which I would like to discuss on forums.
There is no "professional" reason why the 17e shouldn't be allowed. It is without a doubt one of the best regiment around at the moment. Regardless of the "shady" recruitment techniques that were used in the past. I advice 17e tho to clean out their group. I know that 15th and 17e are playing on sunday and regardless of wether it's a troll or not, if you are in the group of another active regiment that plays in the RGL you cannot play for either of your two regiment, keep that in mind!Due to current circumstances in the 63e EU, the NCOs and myself have taken a decision to pull out of the RGL this season. Our main reason for leaving is due to the rather spontaneous migration of our competitive RGL team to other regiments, which has led us to believe that it would be futile to persist in this league and instead begin to regrow our competitive team for the upcoming NWL Season 8. This was an unpredictable turn of events that I didn't fully factor in before signing up to the RGL this time round and I apologise for the regiments which will be effected by this withdrawal. None the less it is happening and I wish the best of luck to the remaining regiments which are participating.
I would appreciate if this message wasn't met with buckets of salt. This was meant to be informative and not something which I would like to discuss on forums.
Well if this doesn't bring salt then God knows what does...
Basically the same excuse Nr12 just gave price kek. Losing the Swede carry and you insta bail out.
Honestly I have to say this season has probably been the most retarded seasons of any league so far with all the disbanding, reforming and bailing out.
I mean even 18e plays till the end regardless of their performance (not ill meant ;)), is it that hard to just grow a pair on a fucking video game? Did you see us cry like some baby bitch and bail out of NWL when 17e reformed with half our members? FUCK NO, so why the hell should this be allowed?
But fuck it right? Cuz no one gives a shit anymore anyway.
Due to current circumstances in the 63e EU, the NCOs and myself have taken a decision to pull out of the RGL this season. Our main reason for leaving is due to the rather spontaneous migration of our competitive RGL team to other regiments, which has led us to believe that it would be futile to persist in this league and instead begin to regrow our competitive team for the upcoming NWL Season 8. This was an unpredictable turn of events that I didn't fully factor in before signing up to the RGL this time round and I apologise for the regiments which will be effected by this withdrawal. None the less it is happening and I wish the best of luck to the remaining regiments which are participating.So sad
I would appreciate if this message wasn't met with buckets of salt. This was meant to be informative and not something which I would like to discuss on forums.
Sad to see 63e leave ;(, I genuinely thought you guys would be one of the last refs for this to happen to, but I understand your position Munj and I love you still ;)Not really much of the 63e NWL Team from the last season left, last event I attended before I went on holiday for a week we struggled to get 15 attendence and by the end had like 12-13, since then a few more guys have gone so don't think there was much we could have done to keep a team going without pinching people from other companies.
Sad to see 63e leave ;(, I genuinely thought you guys would be one of the last refs for this to happen to, but I understand your position Munj and I love you still ;)Not really much of the 63e NWL Team from the last season left, last event I attended before I went on holiday for a week we struggled to get 15 attendence and by the end had like 12-13, since then a few more guys have gone so don't think there was much we could have done to keep a team going without pinching people from other companies.
if you are in the group of another active regiment that plays in the RGL you cannot play for either of your two regiment, keep that in mind!So if I leave my 2nd regiments steam group and change my tag to invite that's ok?
Ok, so a regiment with 260 members in their steam group cannot provide with 15 people for some league... alright gg wp 63e.I just wanted to make the point, seemed like a good introduction to me.
Also Rommel, please read more carefully before replying to what I wrote...
Ok, so a regiment with 260 members in their steam group cannot provide with 15 people for some league... alright gg wp 63e.
Also Rommel, please read more carefully before replying to what I wrote...
Ok, so a regiment with 260 members in their steam group cannot provide with 15 people for some league... alright gg wp 63e.
Also Rommel, please read more carefully before replying to what I wrote...
We get like 40-45 attendance but we can't field a full 15 man NWL line since most are not up to the standard required to pass the trial to get into the NWL line.
No Sweden no win.
I carried the swedes it was all me 8)
Who against Who: Spartans vs K-KA
Date: 21/08
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Need ref
aand sold.August 12th, page 26 we posted :P
Who against Who: 18e vs 77y
Date: 14/08
Time: 7GMT
Referee (If chosen): Lone?
Who against Who: 18e vs Nr12 (44th)
Date: 20/08
Time: 7GMT
Referee (If chosen): anyone
Who against Who: 18e vs GGR_Nr4
Date: 21/08
Time: 7GMT
Referee (If chosen): anyone
How many people are playing tonight...Because I only see us posting that its tonight (in advance), I thought it was a requirement now for Sundays since its over subscribed.
How many people are playing tonight...Because I only see us posting that its tonight (in advance), I thought it was a requirement now for Sundays since its over subscribed.
I just checked the announcements on this thread for those who wanted to play this sunday.
1) 66pp vs 77y
2) 15th_YR vs 17e
3)18e vs GGR_Nr4
4) Spartans vs KKA
1st being obviously the 1st one to post about there match, 4 being the last recent one.
GG Nr4.Thx for the clean Match :)
18e 15 - 5 GGR_Nr4
Was good fun :) Sorry for that one round we had to reset. Churrica had 600 ping and couldn't spawn :PGG Nr4.Thx for the clean Match :)
18e 15 - 5 GGR_Nr4
66Pp vs 77y
Score : 7 : 13
Salakien Referee
great match but it was lagging as fk so please organisers restart servers
15thYR 9-11 17e
gg and well played, try not to put people who are already not in the group in the team though and who's in a different regimental group who's in the RGL (looking at kore...).
15thYR 9-11 17e
gg and well played, try not to put people who are already not in the group in the team though and who's in a different regimental group who's in the RGL (looking at kore...).
GG indeed on an other note Moussolini next time dont just ban someone of the server when somebody like Kore has been in the regiment since the very beginning of the 17e + when we reformed.
him being in the 66pp steamgroup does not mean he plays for them. You should have done some better background checks before banning one of my players!!
still was one of the most intens matches I have played in my entire NW history ;D
15thYR 9-11 17e
gg and well played, try not to put people who are already not in the group in the team though and who's in a different regimental group who's in the RGL (looking at kore...).
GG indeed on an other note Moussolini next time dont just ban someone of the server when somebody like Kore has been in the regiment since the very beginning of the 17e + when we reformed.
him being in the 66pp steamgroup does not mean he plays for them. You should have done some better background checks before banning one of my players!!
still was one of the most intens matches I have played in my entire NW history ;D
Doesnt kore play for 77y? This is why there should be a roster, because nobody knows who is meant to be in the 17e.
15thYR 9-11 17e
gg and well played, try not to put people who are already not in the group in the team though and who's in a different regimental group who's in the RGL (looking at kore...).
GG indeed on an other note Moussolini next time dont just ban someone of the server when somebody like Kore has been in the regiment since the very beginning of the 17e + when we reformed.
him being in the 66pp steamgroup does not mean he plays for them. You should have done some better background checks before banning one of my players!!
still was one of the most intens matches I have played in my entire NW history ;D
15thYR 9-11 17e
gg and well played, try not to put people who are already not in the group in the team though and who's in a different regimental group who's in the RGL (looking at kore...).
GG indeed on an other note Moussolini next time dont just ban someone of the server when somebody like Kore has been in the regiment since the very beginning of the 17e + when we reformed.
him being in the 66pp steamgroup does not mean he plays for them. You should have done some better background checks before banning one of my players!!
still was one of the most intens matches I have played in my entire NW history ;D
Yeah I wish Kore would've clarified that situation, as I couldn't see him being a part of 17e group before the match had started i.e. at 7 pm UK time, and Sky himself admitted he was gonna join the group when time had passed 10 mins over 7 pm UK Time, making it hard for me to believe he wasn't an invite when I saw him part of 66pp group as well. He explained that the group is for other leagues and not RGL, but without notifying me or an organiser I couldn't le him play. Hopefully it was not a big problem with this misunderstanding. ;)
But for obvious reasons read the rules:
1.1.4. You are only allowed to play for ONE Regiment. You can NOT be in 2 Regiments that both participate.
Now if you can't read then I can't really help you with that. :-\
Are people not roster locked? Like when they play one match for a team they are locked to that team/regiment?+1?
spartans what is your profession
15thYR 9-11 17e
gg and well played, try not to put people who are already not in the group in the team though and who's in a different regimental group who's in the RGL (looking at kore...).
GG indeed on an other note Moussolini next time dont just ban someone of the server when somebody like Kore has been in the regiment since the very beginning of the 17e + when we reformed.
him being in the 66pp steamgroup does not mean he plays for them. You should have done some better background checks before banning one of my players!!
still was one of the most intens matches I have played in my entire NW history ;D
Doesnt kore play for 77y? This is why there should be a roster, because nobody knows who is meant to be in the 17e.
A lot of my players were in other regiments at the time I was gone, the moment I came back these people rejoined.
I dont see why we would need a roster when I look very closely upon double reggers as I dont want to have them in my regiment.
Spoiler15thYR 9-11 17e
gg and well played, try not to put people who are already not in the group in the team though and who's in a different regimental group who's in the RGL (looking at kore...).
GG indeed on an other note Moussolini next time dont just ban someone of the server when somebody like Kore has been in the regiment since the very beginning of the 17e + when we reformed.
him being in the 66pp steamgroup does not mean he plays for them. You should have done some better background checks before banning one of my players!!
still was one of the most intens matches I have played in my entire NW history ;D
Yeah I wish Kore would've clarified that situation, as I couldn't see him being a part of 17e group before the match had started i.e. at 7 pm UK time, and Sky himself admitted he was gonna join the group when time had passed 10 mins over 7 pm UK Time, making it hard for me to believe he wasn't an invite when I saw him part of 66pp group as well. He explained that the group is for other leagues and not RGL, but without notifying me or an organiser I couldn't le him play. Hopefully it was not a big problem with this misunderstanding. ;)
But for obvious reasons read the rules:
1.1.4. You are only allowed to play for ONE Regiment. You can NOT be in 2 Regiments that both participate.
Now if you can't read then I can't really help you with that. :-\
''Kore isnt member of 66Pp competetive team ( DT) He play once a time for our arty with his old felluz so please let him play on RGL on 17e cause as fair as I know he left 77y and join them . Same story that was on NWL''
Thanks Salakien for explaining that :).
Anyways Moussolini I talked to Rommel some days ago that I would do a check on my steamgroup making sure my players were no double reggers or could be seen like invites which I made sure of as well during this match, that is why I even asked my Reserve company players to join the steamgroup just to make sure there were no questions about them being in the regiment or not.
then regarding Sky his messages to you he also said: that the SoH players normally are not in the steamgroup and that Kore did rejoin when we reformed.
Further more Sky also did not agree on just banning him.
So calm down with the Salt please, it was a really enjoyable fight :)[close]
Spoiler15thYR 9-11 17e
gg and well played, try not to put people who are already not in the group in the team though and who's in a different regimental group who's in the RGL (looking at kore...).
GG indeed on an other note Moussolini next time dont just ban someone of the server when somebody like Kore has been in the regiment since the very beginning of the 17e + when we reformed.
him being in the 66pp steamgroup does not mean he plays for them. You should have done some better background checks before banning one of my players!!
still was one of the most intens matches I have played in my entire NW history ;D
Yeah I wish Kore would've clarified that situation, as I couldn't see him being a part of 17e group before the match had started i.e. at 7 pm UK time, and Sky himself admitted he was gonna join the group when time had passed 10 mins over 7 pm UK Time, making it hard for me to believe he wasn't an invite when I saw him part of 66pp group as well. He explained that the group is for other leagues and not RGL, but without notifying me or an organiser I couldn't le him play. Hopefully it was not a big problem with this misunderstanding. ;)
But for obvious reasons read the rules:
1.1.4. You are only allowed to play for ONE Regiment. You can NOT be in 2 Regiments that both participate.
Now if you can't read then I can't really help you with that. :-\
''Kore isnt member of 66Pp competetive team ( DT) He play once a time for our arty with his old felluz so please let him play on RGL on 17e cause as fair as I know he left 77y and join them . Same story that was on NWL''
Thanks Salakien for explaining that :).
Anyways Moussolini I talked to Rommel some days ago that I would do a check on my steamgroup making sure my players were no double reggers or could be seen like invites which I made sure of as well during this match, that is why I even asked my Reserve company players to join the steamgroup just to make sure there were no questions about them being in the regiment or not.
then regarding Sky his messages to you he also said: that the SoH players normally are not in the steamgroup and that Kore did rejoin when we reformed.
Further more Sky also did not agree on just banning him.
So calm down with the Salt please, it was a really enjoyable fight :)[close]
As I said, if you can read the rules then you can avoid a misunderstanding like that, not really hard to clarify simple stuff like that is it now?
And it is common knowledge for every regiment and every leader of the regiment in RGL that for your players to play in your team, they need to be in the steamgroup, Kore wasn't at the moment, and sky admitted he was going to join after the clock had passed 7 pm UK Time. Meaning he wasn't before the match had begun, meaning he would be an inv... just know that if you're in such a situation, make sure to clarify this before the match obviously.
Now I'm not gonna discuss this any further, but just remember that for the next time.
lol wat? If a person is double regging and thus breaking the rules of this tournament why the hell would you let him play in the match. That would just cause more upset and discussion after the game. What you are suggesting here is letting a rule break take place. Then you have even more salt after the match with either side being mad about punishments being too hard/lenient and the possibility of a rematch occurring just because you were to scared to take actual measures. There should always be a ref supervising that knows the rules, that's is their whole purpose. If they do not have the power to prevent rulebreaks from happening why have referees in the first place?
lol wat? If a person is double regging and thus breaking the rules of this tournament why the hell would you let him play in the match. That would just cause more upset and discussion after the game. What you are suggesting here is letting a rule break take place. Then you have even more salt after the match with either side being mad about punishments being too hard/lenient and the possibility of a rematch occurring just because you were to scared to take actual measures. There should always be a ref supervising that knows the rules, that's is their whole purpose. If they do not have the power to prevent rulebreaks from happening why have referees in the first place?
I'm more suggesting that it was brash to ban the opposing regiment's member without fully consulting with the said regiments leader about the current situation of that player. I'm not saying that rules should be enforced after a match has taken place but more the fact that with this particular rule you should either work with the other regiment leader to resolve the issue (For example one could ask them not to play that player unless they have evidence of that player being officially a part of that regiment) there and then or if you feel that an issue cannot be resolved adequately at that current time, then you should play the match and discuss it afterwards. But banning members for double regging, without even talking with the opposition leader or having substantial evidence is illogical and actually more bias than anything else.
lol wat? If a person is double regging and thus breaking the rules of this tournament why the hell would you let him play in the match. That would just cause more upset and discussion after the game. What you are suggesting here is letting a rule break take place. Then you have even more salt after the match with either side being mad about punishments being too hard/lenient and the possibility of a rematch occurring just because you were to scared to take actual measures. There should always be a ref supervising that knows the rules, that's is their whole purpose. If they do not have the power to prevent rulebreaks from happening why have referees in the first place?
I'm more suggesting that it was brash to ban the opposing regiment's member without fully consulting with the said regiments leader about the current situation of that player. I'm not saying that rules should be enforced after a match has taken place but more the fact that with this particular rule you should either work with the other regiment leader to resolve the issue (For example one could ask them not to play that player unless they have evidence of that player being officially a part of that regiment) there and then or if you feel that an issue cannot be resolved adequately at that current time, then you should play the match and discuss it afterwards. But banning members for double regging, without even talking with the opposition leader or having substantial evidence is illogical and actually more bias than anything else.
Ok clearly you're just being butthurt and salty now from my previous posts about 63e pussying out like some little bitch. But honestly give it a rest. If you are an illiterate then I certainly can't help you. But the rules clearly state:
1.1.3. Invites aren't allowed.
1.1.4. You are only allowed to play for ONE Regiment. You can NOT be in 2 Regiments that both participate.
1.1.5. If you are not in the Steam group of a Regiment during the match you are considered as an Invite.
And I have stated before several times now that sky confirmed that Kore was not part of the 17e group 10 minutes after 7 pm UK Time when the match was going to start. Rommel himself can go check the logs if he feels the need to confirm any of this. Worst part is that it's not even a big deal, and I don't think 17e gives too much shit about it considering they won, and I certainly don't. Even Kore probably gives two fucks about it as well. We all know what happened, Kore got caught red-handed and there is no denying it. I simply prevented that after getting a CLEAR confirmation of Kore not being part of 17e group when the match was beginning (during overtime because of slow joining from the 17e leader, and balancing). So why don't you act like a good little boy and stay away from this thread? Considering you're no longer in this league and you're not looking to ref anything in the future, your opinion is as much valued as that of Trump regarding the Mexican border.
And Salakien, Kore could've easily prevented this by just joining the group before the match started. apparently he didn't know he had to, but now he does. And so a lesson is learned. Just keep that knowledge and move on really...
A last tip for all the other reg leaders, read the rules. It is not rocket science, honestly.
Aight, why you guys throwing Dirt at each other? Fact is: Kore wasnt in the Group at the official match Time. Point. That means he wasnt allowed and since we had a full server getting kicked out the Match.
If Sky now told Mousso that SoH's arent usually in the Group because most of them seem to play for other regs usually beneath RGL doesnt matter. Sky doesnt make the Rules he should just enforce them.
A roster would be actually nice Pieter, its ok you are watching out for double reggers but if you understand other Regs have maybe concern about that. Since its not that hard Work it should be possible.
17e still won in a very close, intense and beautiful Match. 2 Strong Regs fought with even less salt than i expected (and less you guys create here). They Played better this Time even tho the close result says me there will be more close Fight in the Future:)
Rest of what you Guys doing here is just bullshit...
If Sky now told Mousso that SoH's arent usually in the Group because most of them seem to play for other regs usually beneath RGL doesnt matter. Sky doesnt make the Rules he should just enforce them.
1.1.5. If you are not in the Steam group of a Regiment during the match you are considered as an Invite.If Sky now told Mousso that SoH's arent usually in the Group because most of them seem to play for other regs usually beneath RGL doesnt matter. Sky doesnt make the Rules he should just enforce them.
SoHs aren't in the group because they don't like announcement spam for irrelevant events.
What is this nonsense discussion about banning Kore or not ? We all know Kore is famous sideblocker he may or may not (99%) have effected the score at all so you guys all chill . I played in aswell as SoH for 17e I was not in steam group and joined in before 20 min match to start , the rule saying a player that joins steam group after the match time can not be allowed to play is silly . Double-regging should be investigated but silly things like that will just make more people go salty over it , so as I said Kore is known sideblocker probably he wouldnt have effected the match score in anyway(no offence Core) . So in my opinion its rather irrelevant whether he would have played or not .How would we know if you are in there or not? 17e hasn't updated their roster since they reformed either, so you can not confirm that you are in the regiment. This isn't in any way different for people that are appearently considered "too good" for ordinary steam group spam. I urge you to put all of them in a group as quick as you can Pieter. You have read the rules and agreed to them so i don't know how it didn't come clear to you that these players might need a group aswell. I will not go and punish anyone here, because at the end of the day i want to get this RGL through with trust rather than salt, but, as I said, you are going against the rules with this one even tho at the end of the day I believe that all of them are actually in the 17e.
A last tip for all the other reg leaders, read the rules. It is not rocket science, honestly.Yes please! The rules are not only relevant for regimental leaders, but also for players like Kore.
What is this nonsense discussion about banning Kore or not ? We all know Kore is famous sideblocker he may or may not (99%) have effected the score at all so you guys all chill . I played in aswell as SoH for 17e I was not in steam group and joined in before 20 min match to start , the rule saying a player that joins steam group after the match time can not be allowed to play is silly . Double-regging should be investigated but silly things like that will just make more people go salty over it , so as I said Kore is known sideblocker probably he wouldnt have effected the match score in anyway(no offence Core) . So in my opinion its rather irrelevant whether he would have played or not .
Tbh that's a stupid rule. When I was Gren in 77y I wasn't in the Steam group and I know plenty of players who did the same to avoid the group spam. Even when I was in 63e I played in two RGL matches without being in the Steam group again to avoid spam. I'm not sticking up for Kore or anything just my opinion on the rule.1.1.5. If you are not in the Steam group of a Regiment during the match you are considered as an Invite.If Sky now told Mousso that SoH's arent usually in the Group because most of them seem to play for other regs usually beneath RGL doesnt matter. Sky doesnt make the Rules he should just enforce them.
SoHs aren't in the group because they don't like announcement spam for irrelevant events.
It doesn't matter how stupid a rule is. By joining this tournament you agreed to stick to them.Tbh that's a stupid rule. When I was Gren in 77y I wasn't in the Steam group and I know plenty of players who did the same to avoid the group spam. Even when I was in 63e I played in two RGL matches without being in the Steam group again to avoid spam. I'm not sticking up for Kore or anything just my opinion on the rule.1.1.5. If you are not in the Steam group of a Regiment during the match you are considered as an Invite.If Sky now told Mousso that SoH's arent usually in the Group because most of them seem to play for other regs usually beneath RGL doesnt matter. Sky doesnt make the Rules he should just enforce them.
SoHs aren't in the group because they don't like announcement spam for irrelevant events.
You don't have to be in the Steam group to be an official member of the regiment.
It doesn't matter how stupid a rule is. By joining this tournament you agreed to stick to them.Tbh that's a stupid rule. When I was Gren in 77y I wasn't in the Steam group and I know plenty of players who did the same to avoid the group spam. Even when I was in 63e I played in two RGL matches without being in the Steam group again to avoid spam. I'm not sticking up for Kore or anything just my opinion on the rule.1.1.5. If you are not in the Steam group of a Regiment during the match you are considered as an Invite.If Sky now told Mousso that SoH's arent usually in the Group because most of them seem to play for other regs usually beneath RGL doesnt matter. Sky doesnt make the Rules he should just enforce them.
SoHs aren't in the group because they don't like announcement spam for irrelevant events.
You don't have to be in the Steam group to be an official member of the regiment.
Aight, why you guys throwing Dirt at each other? Fact is: Kore wasnt in the Group at the official match Time. Point. That means he wasnt allowed and since we had a full server getting kicked out the Match.
If Sky now told Mousso that SoH's arent usually in the Group because most of them seem to play for other regs usually beneath RGL doesnt matter. Sky doesnt make the Rules he should just enforce them.
A roster would be actually nice Pieter, its ok you are watching out for double reggers but if you understand other Regs have maybe concern about that. Since its not that hard Work it should be possible.
17e still won in a very close, intense and beautiful Match. 2 Strong Regs fought with even less salt than i expected (and less you guys create here). They Played better this Time even tho the close result says me there will be more close Fight in the Future:)
Rest of what you Guys doing here is just bullshit...
lol wat? If a person is double regging and thus breaking the rules of this tournament why the hell would you let him play in the match. That would just cause more upset and discussion after the game. What you are suggesting here is letting a rule break take place. Then you have even more salt after the match with either side being mad about punishments being too hard/lenient and the possibility of a rematch occurring just because you were to scared to take actual measures. There should always be a ref supervising that knows the rules, that's is their whole purpose. If they do not have the power to prevent rulebreaks from happening why have referees in the first place?
I'm more suggesting that it was brash to ban the opposing regiment's member without fully consulting with the said regiments leader about the current situation of that player. I'm not saying that rules should be enforced after a match has taken place but more the fact that with this particular rule you should either work with the other regiment leader to resolve the issue (For example one could ask them not to play that player unless they have evidence of that player being officially a part of that regiment) there and then or if you feel that an issue cannot be resolved adequately at that current time, then you should play the match and discuss it afterwards. But banning members for double regging, without even talking with the opposition leader or having substantial evidence is illogical and actually more bias than anything else.
Ok clearly you're just being butthurt and salty now from my previous posts about 63e pussying out like some little bitch. But honestly give it a rest. If you are an illiterate then I certainly can't help you. But the rules clearly state:
1.1.3. Invites aren't allowed.
1.1.4. You are only allowed to play for ONE Regiment. You can NOT be in 2 Regiments that both participate.
1.1.5. If you are not in the Steam group of a Regiment during the match you are considered as an Invite.
And I have stated before several times now that sky confirmed that Kore was not part of the 17e group 10 minutes after 7 pm UK Time when the match was going to start. Rommel himself can go check the logs if he feels the need to confirm any of this. Worst part is that it's not even a big deal, and I don't think 17e gives too much shit about it considering they won, and I certainly don't. Even Kore probably gives two fucks about it as well. We all know what happened, Kore got caught red-handed and there is no denying it. I simply prevented that after getting a CLEAR confirmation of Kore not being part of 17e group when the match was beginning (during overtime because of slow joining from the 17e leader, and balancing). So why don't you act like a good little boy and stay away from this thread? Considering you're no longer in this league and you're not looking to ref anything in the future, your opinion is as much valued as that of Trump regarding the Mexican border.
And Salakien, Kore could've easily prevented this by just joining the group before the match started. apparently he didn't know he had to, but now he does. And so a lesson is learned. Just keep that knowledge and move on really...
A last tip for all the other reg leaders, read the rules. It is not rocket science, honestly.
And the fact Marley that you want a roster of the 17e when the 15th_YR during the march against us had people like Gasset and Bellator which are both active officers/NCO's of the miquelets, Kobzik and Edward which are in the Preobaz steamgroup and Bboyka can confirm that Kobzik is one of the officers that arranged there events.
Besha being still an officer in the Saints and Luke Blacktham is in the 13te_HG.
I mean if I am the one to be making a roster lol for just having been reformed and getting accused of having one invite then honestly what should you guys been doing then. :P
I can give you a roster template if you are finding it difficult. I do training courses on it during Tuesday between 6-7pm.OKEY :D
It doesn't matter how stupid a rule is. By joining this tournament you agreed to stick to them.Tbh that's a stupid rule. When I was Gren in 77y I wasn't in the Steam group and I know plenty of players who did the same to avoid the group spam. Even when I was in 63e I played in two RGL matches without being in the Steam group again to avoid spam. I'm not sticking up for Kore or anything just my opinion on the rule.1.1.5. If you are not in the Steam group of a Regiment during the match you are considered as an Invite.If Sky now told Mousso that SoH's arent usually in the Group because most of them seem to play for other regs usually beneath RGL doesnt matter. Sky doesnt make the Rules he should just enforce them.
SoHs aren't in the group because they don't like announcement spam for irrelevant events.
You don't have to be in the Steam group to be an official member of the regiment.
I guess for a feckless peon such as yourself this limp-wristed approach to solving an issue is the height of due diligence. Being part of a Steam group is by no means a decisive factor in determining someone's affiliation to a regiment or lack thereof. For example in the 63e we have over 1000 people in the Steam group, but by no means are they all active members of the regiment. Asking regular members of a regiment for important information regarding the regiment rather than the regimental leader is wilfully negligent. As for the rest of the chaff you've typed, it's really not worth any further discussion on my part; I get the feeling continuing this exchange with yourself will be tantamount to trying to argue with a 'bad little boy', with cookies up his bum ;)
You do understand that Moussolini started this bullshit and still continues it just to get his right even though he Should not have banned Kore without consulting the regimental leader or for example Sky/Destiny.
And the fact Marley that you want a roster of the 17e when the 15th_YR during the march against us had people like Gasset and Bellator which are both active officers/NCO's of the miquelets, Kobzik and Edward which are in the Preobaz steamgroup and Bboyka can confirm that Kobzik is one of the officers that arranged there events.
Besha being still an officer in the Saints and Luke Blacktham is in the 13te_HG.
I mean if I am the one to be making a roster lol for just having been reformed and getting accused of having one invite then honestly what should you guys been doing then. :P
I made no complains about his seeing that in a conversation with rommel he said it was "fine to have double reggers as long as they were not in an other regiment that plays in the RGL as well"
Which was rather a suprise to me but seeing he is the host I wont question it.
Me and Falk both had a fun time commanding and playing this match and wished each other both goodluck in the upcoming battles.
So lets just stop on this topic, GG was a nice match and haters gonna hate ::)
Same as NWL the silly moaning about who is in what reg happens, cant it be done similar to how sports run competitions regarding the members, ie before the tournament a team is signed up (im not saying we should have every reg sign up a list as that can be tricky and alot to sort) but what i mean is once that tournament has started you are bound to the regiment you were in when said tournament started. Its now official, its started, you cant then leave a regiment join another and then be eligible to play for that regiment as you were 'signed up' as part of the other regiments 'roster' so to speak.What if a regiment disbands?
An example being football, for the Champions league a team is required to submit its squad for the tournament, if in a transfer window during the tournament a player leaves club A and joins club B he cannot then play champions league football for club B as he is officialy registered as club As member (ofc i speak regarding the finals so nobody try to be smug and start chatting that you can in qualifying rounds).
Doing this WOULD 'cup tie/league tie' players and would rid any league of the constant petty argument of who you play for/have played for etc. If the RGL started and Kore (as an example cus kore always is) was on the 66pp/77y roster whichever reg he was in at the time, then that IS HIS REG for the entirety of the tournament, he is in 17e now yes but he then cant play for 17e as he is as said earlier cup tied. Problem = Solved. If it aint solved then fuck it lets just create a roster of every comp player and do a champions league draw and see which reg gets what player this season.
Same as NWL the silly moaning about who is in what reg happens, cant it be done similar to how sports run competitions regarding the members, ie before the tournament a team is signed up (im not saying we should have every reg sign up a list as that can be tricky and alot to sort) but what i mean is once that tournament has started you are bound to the regiment you were in when said tournament started. Its now official, its started, you cant then leave a regiment join another and then be eligible to play for that regiment as you were 'signed up' as part of the other regiments 'roster' so to speak.Me gusta.
An example being football, for the Champions league a team is required to submit its squad for the tournament, if in a transfer window during the tournament a player leaves club A and joins club B he cannot then play champions league football for club B as he is officialy registered as club As member (ofc i speak regarding the finals so nobody try to be smug and start chatting that you can in qualifying rounds).
Doing this WOULD 'cup tie/league tie' players and would rid any league of the constant petty argument of who you play for/have played for etc. If the RGL started and Kore (as an example cus kore always is) was on the 66pp/77y roster whichever reg he was in at the time, then that IS HIS REG for the entirety of the tournament, he is in 17e now yes but he then cant play for 17e as he is as said earlier cup tied. Problem = Solved. If it aint solved then fuck it lets just create a roster of every comp player and do a champions league draw and see which reg gets what player this season.
Or simply leaves RGL for that matter.Same as NWL the silly moaning about who is in what reg happens, cant it be done similar to how sports run competitions regarding the members, ie before the tournament a team is signed up (im not saying we should have every reg sign up a list as that can be tricky and alot to sort) but what i mean is once that tournament has started you are bound to the regiment you were in when said tournament started. Its now official, its started, you cant then leave a regiment join another and then be eligible to play for that regiment as you were 'signed up' as part of the other regiments 'roster' so to speak.What if a regiment disbands?
An example being football, for the Champions league a team is required to submit its squad for the tournament, if in a transfer window during the tournament a player leaves club A and joins club B he cannot then play champions league football for club B as he is officialy registered as club As member (ofc i speak regarding the finals so nobody try to be smug and start chatting that you can in qualifying rounds).
Doing this WOULD 'cup tie/league tie' players and would rid any league of the constant petty argument of who you play for/have played for etc. If the RGL started and Kore (as an example cus kore always is) was on the 66pp/77y roster whichever reg he was in at the time, then that IS HIS REG for the entirety of the tournament, he is in 17e now yes but he then cant play for 17e as he is as said earlier cup tied. Problem = Solved. If it aint solved then fuck it lets just create a roster of every comp player and do a champions league draw and see which reg gets what player this season.
Same as NWL the silly moaning about who is in what reg happens, cant it be done similar to how sports run competitions regarding the members, ie before the tournament a team is signed up (im not saying we should have every reg sign up a list as that can be tricky and alot to sort) but what i mean is once that tournament has started you are bound to the regiment you were in when said tournament started. Its now official, its started, you cant then leave a regiment join another and then be eligible to play for that regiment as you were 'signed up' as part of the other regiments 'roster' so to speak.That's what I suggested some pages earlier so I wholeheartedly agree.
An example being football, for the Champions league a team is required to submit its squad for the tournament, if in a transfer window during the tournament a player leaves club A and joins club B he cannot then play champions league football for club B as he is officialy registered as club As member (ofc i speak regarding the finals so nobody try to be smug and start chatting that you can in qualifying rounds).
Doing this WOULD 'cup tie/league tie' players and would rid any league of the constant petty argument of who you play for/have played for etc. If the RGL started and Kore (as an example cus kore always is) was on the 66pp/77y roster whichever reg he was in at the time, then that IS HIS REG for the entirety of the tournament, he is in 17e now yes but he then cant play for 17e as he is as said earlier cup tied. Problem = Solved. If it aint solved then fuck it lets just create a roster of every comp player and do a champions league draw and see which reg gets what player this season.
Do the same thing as Native. Take IDs, ask a clear roster when signing up. Allow one ID per person and that's it. It's nothing complicated at all and it gives me the impression you're arguing about nothing.
It helps you keeping a good track of the players, and avoid those kind of incidents, or atleast be capable of sorting them faster and easier. You wanna be a competitive community? Fine. Act as such then and make things professionals, because thinking you're gonna follow the regimental rosters by looking at their steam groups is not only absolutly insane but also completly impracticable in the facts. For the matter, all the K-KA matchs I've played in the RGL, I wasn't even in their steam group and Pride didn't know it because I left on my own purpose, getting fed up of bugged annoucements I couldn't hide. I still considered myself in the regiment though.
Do the same thing as Native. Take IDs, ask a clear roster when signing up. Allow one ID per person and that's it. It's nothing complicated at all and it gives me the impression you're arguing about nothing.
It helps you keeping a good track of the players, and avoid those kind of incidents, or atleast be capable of sorting them faster and easier. You wanna be a competitive community? Fine. Act as such then and make things professionals, because thinking you're gonna follow the regimental rosters by looking at their steam groups is not only absolutly insane but also completly impracticable in the facts. For the matter, all the K-KA matchs I've played in the RGL, I wasn't even in their steam group and Pride didn't know it because I left on my own purpose, getting fed up of bugged annoucements I couldn't hide. I still considered myself in the regiment though.
What happens now that the 79e is back please confirm thank you.
yours truly,
Maurice xxx
Omg what are you guys doing with your life lmao
Absolutely agree, he has a point :D!Hola gasset
Fixing Bikes and find solutions for the stupid people that dont understand simple rules without arguing about:)Wew
Fixing Bikes and find solutions for the stupid people that dont understand simple rules without arguing about:)
I can give you a roster template if you are finding it difficult. I do training courses on it during Tuesday between 6-7pm.
Fuck them both then. No way should 17e be able to take the spot of a separate regiment.
Fuck them both then. No way should 17e be able to take the spot of a separate regiment.Especially considering the 79e won 3 matches and a draw, the 17e however only won one match against the 15th.
Fixing Bikeslmfao thats not nice morley
I dont think Reservists are a Problem... As Long as they don't Play for 2 Regiments participating At RGL and aren't Invites it Is no Problem because at all they Are more or less retired Players (as I define Reservists) or players Who don't attend very often, but I don't See a Problem if they only Play for one Regiment in the RGL.
As this seems to be an issue the captains are complaining about, I had an Idea I've already told Rommel about, making some Lists for every Regiment participating. Where they give the names of the Players that Will probably Play the Whole Season (This System Is running for example at NWGFL, there even with the ID's). Changes (Leaving People new People etc) would be told to the organisers or Whoever Is in Charge of this. Would make it kinna easier for all, especially the referees, to avoid Invites. The Number of Players on this List could be limited to 25 or 30. Just an Idea. Wouldnt be that intense to Manage.
all of this is really bs
VonBergen you are clearly a very trusting person and the Nr4 is one of my favourite regiments (I especially love Beatz :-*) but you have too much faith in people. To assume that nothing should be done and people should just stop breaking the rules has not, and will never, work.
The ID list is a good idea, albeit, a lot of work for Rommel and co. but if they have the patience then it could be great. However, I'm not sure it is worth it for Rommel. Having to deal with all the, for lack of better term, 'salt' is a time consuming and boring process that I became familiar with after running the Groupfighting Server for while and it begins to really make you lose faith in people.
Having said that, the people that have been accused of playing for two regiments really don't seem to make that much of a difference. The regiment more capable in groupfighting always wins anyway.
Here I was thinking the Spartans would put up more of a fight :'(AHU AHU AHU
Here I was thinking the Spartans would put up more of a fight :'(AHU AHU AHU
This is a video of the K-KA vs Spartans match in which the K-KA won 14-6. Thanks to Frittentime for recording!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d9bE2ww7f4
This is a video of the K-KA vs Spartans match in which the K-KA won 14-6. Thanks to Frittentime for recording!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d9bE2ww7f4
it's good to see that nock is finally demoted to his true rank
SpoilerThis is a video of the K-KA vs Spartans match in which the K-KA won 14-6. Thanks to Frittentime for recording!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d9bE2ww7f4
it's good to see that nock is finally demoted to his true rank[close]
Much fun gros pd
Someone once asked me if the 18e like taking other regs up the bum.
I simple reply with: If we dont take it, who else gets an excuse to meme like we do?
Who against Who: 15th_YR vs K-KA
Date: 04/09
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Need ref
18e? More like wecrycusmapisntgoodforusinspartanlb'e'morelike15thtrolltomakeeverythingharderforeveryoneelse
18e? More like wecrycusmapisntgoodforusinspartanlb'e'morelike15thtrolltomakeeverythingharderforeveryoneelse
18e? More like wecrycusmapisntgoodforusinspartanlb'e'morelike15thtrolltomakeeverythingharderforeveryoneelse
+1
Sorry already booked <3
Sorry already booked <3
Ye now it is booked by me :D
Yea thats not how it works.Sorry already booked <3
Ye now it is booked by me :D
Yea thats not how it works.Sorry already booked <3
Ye now it is booked by me :D
If its already been post then why do it again? All you have done is cause confusion.
Well you felt the need to repost your booking, which made us feel as though you are only now doing it?
You are clearly the one making trouble..
Well you felt the need to repost your booking, which made us feel as though you are only now doing it?
You are clearly the one making trouble..
And this is only your opinion :P
But ok lets end this m8. i am sry but you have to take another server because ody <3 booked first
So anyway... There wasn't rly a problem but its sloved now, we asked for server so K-KA vs 66pp will use RGL_2
The end...
17e 17-3 72nd
gg, some more close rounds for us but lost them :(
So anyway... There wasn't rly a problem but its sloved now, we asked for server so K-KA vs 66pp will use RGL_2
The end...
Fine :)
And for the next time Price, dont fuck me up and just stfu :*
So anyway... There wasn't rly a problem but its sloved now, we asked for server so K-KA vs 66pp will use RGL_2
The end...
Fine :)
And for the next time Price, dont fuck me up and just stfu :*
can you just shut it down actually
Bumppieter going full savage again :D
Bumppieter going full savage again :D
17e 19 - 1 6te Garde
17e 19 - 1 6te Garde
thanks for the good match DasBrot his entry frags were real ;D
rip 6te, 17e op ^^17e 19 - 1 6te Garde
thanks for the good match DasBrot his entry frags were real ;D
was a good match indeed, some close rounds but we all saw who had the better melee
rip 6te, 17e op ^^17e 19 - 1 6te Garde
thanks for the good match DasBrot his entry frags were real ;D
was a good match indeed, some close rounds but we all saw who had the better melee
rip 6te, 17e op ^^17e 19 - 1 6te Garde
thanks for the good match DasBrot his entry frags were real ;D
was a good match indeed, some close rounds but we all saw who had the better melee
KKA vs 17e is gonna be hype
rip 6te, 17e op ^^17e 19 - 1 6te Garde
thanks for the good match DasBrot his entry frags were real ;D
was a good match indeed, some close rounds but we all saw who had the better melee
KKA vs 17e is gonna be hype
Nobody cares about schedule anymore, We played 72nd 3-4 weeks early just last Sunday ::)Remember that there is still a deadline!
rip 6te, 17e op ^^17e 19 - 1 6te Garde
thanks for the good match DasBrot his entry frags were real ;D
was a good match indeed, some close rounds but we all saw who had the better melee
KKA vs 17e is gonna be hype
Lemme Ref dat pl0x.
rip 6te, 17e op ^^17e 19 - 1 6te Garde
thanks for the good match DasBrot his entry frags were real ;D
was a good match indeed, some close rounds but we all saw who had the better melee
KKA vs 17e is gonna be hype
Lemme Ref dat pl0x.
Maybe having someone competent would be desirable. ;)
Spoilerrip 6te, 17e op ^^17e 19 - 1 6te Garde
thanks for the good match DasBrot his entry frags were real ;D
was a good match indeed, some close rounds but we all saw who had the better melee
KKA vs 17e is gonna be hype
Lemme Ref dat pl0x.
Maybe having someone competent would be desirable. ;)[close]
So You're out?
everyone in 15th has itSalty cause too autistic to be in our whatsapp
Mouss doesn't give banter he gives autism. Contagious.
I hope Mousso knows that this Is banter, cba to react on such shit If he means it Serious.
Mouss doesn't give banter he gives autism. Contagious.
Pls don't cri because I would ban half of 18e for autism if I had to ref one of your RGL matches. ;)I hope Mousso knows that this Is banter, cba to react on such shit If he means it Serious.
I'm five years old, please elaborate what is this banter you speak of?
Moussolini more like Saltylini AM I RIGHT FAM 8)
Mouss doesn't give banter he gives autism. Contagious.
Pls don't cri because I would ban half of 18e for autism if I had to ref one of your RGL matches. ;)I hope Mousso knows that this Is banter, cba to react on such shit If he means it Serious.
I'm five years old, please elaborate what is this banter you speak of?
Banter:
"Supple term used to describe activities or chat that is playful, intelligent and original. Banter is something you either posses or lack, there is no middle ground. It is also something inherently English, stemming as it does from traditional hi-jinks and tomfoolery of British yesteryear."
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=banter
Needed to Google it myself.
WTF is going on here :o
Hi kore hows your headWTF is going on here :o
attention whores arguing??
Honestly we all are tired of your autism, Lone and Mousso, take it to PM's.
Heinrich Dad Mouss said something mean about meeeeeeewew
Heinrich Dad Mouss said something mean about meeeeeeewew
Mouss why u being mean!
Heinrich Dad Mouss said something mean about meeeeeeewew
Mouss why u being mean!
Stop posting hereHeinrich Dad Mouss said something mean about meeeeeeewew
Mouss why u being mean!
*snip*
Who against Who: 15th_YR vs K-KA
Date: 04/09
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Moussolini
Server: RGL 2
15thYR 11-9 K-KAYeah excellent fights. Shame we couldn't clutch the comeback from 7-10 to 10-10 but great match nontheless.
Intense rounds and good melee, well played by both sides without any problems ;)
Well we had fun against 66pp right up until Salakien got salty and dropped 10 people to spectator. Oh well we still won so I won't complain too much ;)I don't get what the point of not spawning them back in was after they'd already lost. But gg.
18e 12 - 8 66pp
Well we had fun against 66pp right up until Salakien got salty and dropped 10 people to spectator. Oh well we still won so I won't complain too much ;)I don't get what the point of not spawning them back in was after they'd already lost. But gg.
18e 12 - 8 66pp
Isnt that on my decisions to get them in spec ? if they play bad ? you won the match - GG WP - stay out of salt :)So rude to your members ;[
15thYR 11-9 K-KAez russian invites
Intense rounds and good melee, well played by both sides without any problems ;)
So, how many weeks left are there, or matches?The season will end 2nd of October. It says that on the main thread ;)
15thYR 11-9 K-KAez russian invites
Intense rounds and good melee, well played by both sides without any problems ;)
rush right/left flank15thYR 11-9 K-KAez russian invites
Intense rounds and good melee, well played by both sides without any problems ;)
Rush b?
I'm really sorry to 66Pp,that wasn't so good match,I was late to do something.Max1m you were straight up running from me, Herishey and Pluto. Then coming back in after we finished Wencosa and Hokej. Worked for you like twice. Teamplay can't have been that bad considering we still won after you joined ;)
Well,the 18e is nice regiment to play against,but there's no teamplay,I played on different flanks and always made 3-4 kills per round like 1v3. 66Pp had the same situation but less skills and I was late.
GG to both teams.
It's just a game, respect other people!nice jock
It's just a game, respect other people!nice jock
It's just a game, respect other people!
It's just a game, respect other people!
Max1m you were straight up running from me, Herishey and Pluto. Then coming back in after we finished Wencosa and Hokej. Worked for you like twice. Teamplay can't have been that bad considering we still won after you joined ;)
It was a fun match though I enjoyed it but as per usual the salt could have been avoided.
Herishey said the match will be up over the next couple of days.
Please dont post here anymoreQuoteMax1m you were straight up running from me, Herishey and Pluto. Then coming back in after we finished Wencosa and Hokej. Worked for you like twice. Teamplay can't have been that bad considering we still won after you joined ;)
It was a fun match though I enjoyed it but as per usual the salt could have been avoided.
Herishey said the match will be up over the next couple of days.Please,John,i died only two times by teamkills,i played for 4 rounds,look at the score.Spoiler(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.akamai.steamusercontent.com%2Fugc%2F437235073111412422%2F5BDF949BD9EF7AE02ED6F224E47356F81E818D37%2F&hash=2fc62dd89172b41505881aac2b7f5ce3b8a177dc)[close]
U lost 4-5 rounds which i played for 66Pp.
Don't be mad,your regiment is 50/50 in teamplay,i'm not your hater that's an evaluation.
Gi actually bothered to get whitelisted?!?!?he always was.
Gi actually bothered to get whitelisted?!?!?he always was.
MATCH: 15th_YR vs 77ygg
Referee : Salakien
RESULT : 12 :8
I have to void one round because server crashed like WTF is going on and it gets laggy even on RGL_2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMEM3cRcXSsnice vid there. If only 15th did record their matches with me yelling "cyka blyat" every round in ts...
nice vid there. If only 15th did record their matches with me yelling "cyka blyat" every round in ts...rush b!!!!!!!!!
RASH BEEE*nice vid there. If only 15th did record their matches with me yelling "cyka blyat" every round in ts...rush b!!!!!!!!!
nah it was rush right left flank!!!!nice vid there. If only 15th did record their matches with me yelling "cyka blyat" every round in ts...rush b!!!!!!!!!
nice vid there. If only 15th did record their matches with me yelling "cyka blyat" every round in ts...
I doubt people would want to hear your rome total war videos ayyyyyyyyyyyyy lma0nice vid there. If only 15th did record their matches with me yelling "cyka blyat" every round in ts...
I do record it Kobzik, but I doubt people would want to hear that Russki screaming. ;)
I doubt people would want to hear your rome total war videos ayyyyyyyyyyyyy lma0nice vid there. If only 15th did record their matches with me yelling "cyka blyat" every round in ts...
I do record it Kobzik, but I doubt people would want to hear that Russki screaming. ;)
yeI doubt people would want to hear your rome total war videos ayyyyyyyyyyyyy lma0nice vid there. If only 15th did record their matches with me yelling "cyka blyat" every round in ts...
I do record it Kobzik, but I doubt people would want to hear that Russki screaming. ;)
Sick comment mate. I see you are trying to improve your English skills with your 2960 posts on here. They must all be filled with relevant replies that are all worth reading. And I expect just as good a 2961st reply to this as well. ;)
Omg stop spam...(https://i.gyazo.com/55ad510805014dbcade4c03148fa5372.png)
K-KA vs 72nd score maybe ?
We could have avoided so much stupid shit in that 1v1. I don't even care about the last round. Hey ho 18e are the "shit" regiment that should not even be payed attention too.
Please 15th let the ego go. I agree'd that I fucked up with the score but did it need to become such a massive thing that got debated for 10 minutes? Not really. Not to mention Maccle leaving the 17e to join us taking another fucking 10.
No Groupfight should ever have to take an hour. We were very much enjoying it until we took 10 minutes to settle one round.
Video up in a few hours.
Hey, me and Pieter agreed on something?!Seems like anything can happen nowadays?
We could have avoided so much stupid shit in that 1v1. I don't even care about the last round. Hey ho 18e are the "shit" regiment that should not even be payed attention too.
Please 15th let the ego go. I agree'd that I fucked up with the score but did it need to become such a massive thing that got debated for 10 minutes? Not really. Not to mention Maccle leaving the 17e to join us taking another fucking 10.
No Groupfight should ever have to take an hour. We were very much enjoying it until we took 10 minutes to settle one round.
Video up in a few hours.
We could have avoided so much stupid shit in that 1v1. I don't even care about the last round. Hey ho 18e are the "shit" regiment that should not even be payed attention too.
Please 15th let the ego go. I agree'd that I fucked up with the score but did it need to become such a massive thing that got debated for 10 minutes? Not really. Not to mention Maccle leaving the 17e to join us taking another fucking 10.
No Groupfight should ever have to take an hour. We were very much enjoying it until we took 10 minutes to settle one round.
Video up in a few hours.
You know Price i respect you as a Person, but it was mainly the behaviour of your Members during the GF that made things very toxic. Case Maccle would probably help if he leaves the Steamgroup of 17e also, just to avoid such discussions.
As much as I had to reset once for a few messing around I had to reset 3 times for yours.We could have avoided so much stupid shit in that 1v1. I don't even care about the last round. Hey ho 18e are the "shit" regiment that should not even be payed attention too.
Please 15th let the ego go. I agree'd that I fucked up with the score but did it need to become such a massive thing that got debated for 10 minutes? Not really. Not to mention Maccle leaving the 17e to join us taking another fucking 10.
No Groupfight should ever have to take an hour. We were very much enjoying it until we took 10 minutes to settle one round.
Video up in a few hours.
You know Price i respect you as a Person, but it was mainly the behaviour of your Members during the GF that made things very toxic. Case Maccle would probably help if he leaves the Steamgroup of 17e also, just to avoid such discussions.
wrong account sorry. btw no need to talk about "egos" and stuff. lets keep it friendly. In the end its a tournament, and you know when the ref from the enemy team claims a wrong score and all his members agree in that ofcourse it create a discussion. Everyone can fuck up a score once, but i guess not a whole Regiment...
We knew we weren't going to win RGL and have no intentions of trying to become the best regiment on this dead game
You've already won on bantz & memes tho...Thanks Munj! We are good at something.
Nonono Marley you miss understood what I meant xD We will always take our competitive side serious. Kicked 2 people today for the very thing. What I meant by what I said was that we do not care for the score as long as we give the match a go, we didn't want to make a big thing out of it which is why that mess with Mouss could have been avoided so easily. So many 15th members were messaging us on steam asking what was going on, all we could say was Mouss was making a big deal where there was none to us :/ I actually ended up saying go mid sentence from Mouss when he wasn't ready xD You guys still won :'(
18e is a reg more faced on 1v1's than groupfights, we enjoy balanced 1v1's with fun leading and tactics which is why RGL is just a bonus to us :D Although I am sad to say the 1v1 scene is dying out quicker :'(
I mean we lost 15-5 ya I know rip us but last time we did a GF on this scale we got 20-0'd so we do feel as though we are improving even if it is slowly. It takes time to mold a regiment full of new people into a regiment that can win groupfights like that.You've already won on bantz & memes tho...Thanks Munj! We are good at something.
15th 15-5 18e.I'm not from Yorkshire, not really sure what you are getting at.
As I said earlier,18e should improve teamplay level.
Greetings to Yorkshire:)
Nah man I don't really keep beef with anyone.
Except Dantheman
holy fuck thats another story in its own...
all we could say was Mouss was making a big deal where there was none to us :/
15th 15-5 18e.I'm not from Yorkshire, not really sure what you are getting at.
As I said earlier,18e should improve teamplay level.
Greetings to Yorkshire:)
Well this shit reg with bad teamplay still beat 66pepe and made Salakien and Hokej RQ so you should probs just stahp
Match : 66Pp vs Spartans
Ref : Salakien & Lone
Date : 18th of September - 19:00 BST
Server : RGL 2
You told me it was 9-3 when it was 8-3 so don't get too anal ;)Nah man I don't really keep beef with anyone.
Except Dantheman
holy fuck thats another story in its own...
Hey, as long as you can learn to count one day, I'm happy. ;)
all we could say was Mouss was making a big deal where there was none to us :/
He makes a big deal of everything nowadays, I've never thought he'd turn into such retard ;)
You told me it was 9-3 when it was 8-3 so don't get too anal ;)Nah man I don't really keep beef with anyone.
Except Dantheman
holy fuck thats another story in its own...
Hey, as long as you can learn to count one day, I'm happy. ;)
I'm not from Yorkshire, not really sure what you are getting at.Of course you are not from Yorkshire,wtf is this about xD
Well this shit reg with bad teamplay still beat 66pepe and made Salakien and Hokej RQ so you should probs just stahp
im sure price doesnt need telling what he needs to improve on.. But 66pp do need to improve on alot of things like not to get salty after one letter of a word.QuoteI'm not from Yorkshire, not really sure what you are getting at.Of course you are not from Yorkshire,wtf is this about xD
Well this shit reg with bad teamplay still beat 66pepe and made Salakien and Hokej RQ so you should probs just stahp
I did not say that it's a shit reg,I said you should improve ur teamplay;)
Why are you talking about 66Pp match,it doesn't make any sence xD
And stop crying,lil boi)
Heinrich he is 3rd world, you Welsh know better than to talk to lesser beings like them ::)::) ::)
(https://i.imgur.com/tTuK9I8.gif)
really mousso when did you turn from really nice person into fkin salty cancerous toxin ? like wtf i m not friend of price too but really this behaviour from you ? You were one of very few commanders among competetive regs that was normal and decent when you talk with me but it seems that longer this game is dying people get more edgy and rude
Why so aggressive all of a sudden mouse
really mousso when did you turn from really nice person into fkin salty cancerous toxin ? like wtf i m not friend of price too but really this behaviour from you ? You were one of very few commanders among competetive regs that was normal and decent when you talk with me but it seems that longer this game is dying people get more edgy and rude
Well, the only thing keeping this game entertaining enough to be playing is some odd bantz here and there ain't it? ;)
Besides if there wasn't any edgyness to it, this thread would seem half-dead.Why so aggressive all of a sudden mouse
Hey, you wanna play the game, you gotta deal with the (potential) pain.
WTF is happening here :D This isnt nwl thread . Save your salt for it :Dno NWL should have no salt seeing its the last one but theres bound to be ::)
Hey, you wanna play the game, you gotta deal with the (potential) pain.Don't know about you, but i don't carry over existential pain to NW ::) ::) ::)
Hey, you wanna play the game, you gotta deal with the (potential) pain.Don't know about you, but i don't carry over existential pain to NW ::) ::) ::)
Lol Mouss you really are not funny. I don't think anyone finds your jokes funny. I just forgot what the rounds were before the reset -_-
Don't worry Salakien, one day I might figure out if you have any other reason to dislike me other than we beat your regiment over and over again.
really mousso when did you turn from really nice person into fkin salty cancerous toxin ? like wtf i m not friend of price too but really this behaviour from you ? You were one of very few commanders among competetive regs that was normal and decent when you talk with me but it seems that longer this game is dying people get more edgy and rude
Lol Mouss you really are not funny. I don't think anyone finds your jokes funny. I just forgot what the rounds were before the reset -_-
Lol Mouss you really are not funny. I don't think anyone finds your jokes funny. I just forgot what the rounds were before the reset -_-
Who said I did this for your or anyone else's amusement? Instead of spewing out superficial garbage which you've apparently done for the last 10k posts or so. I'd suggest you stick to doing what you do best, being incompetent that is.
Oh wait, doing exactly what you are doing is the very proof of that incompetence. My bad, continue spouting that superficial garbage that we all so love to see.
Guys its just a game*gets cancer*
How did you not already have it?Guys its just a game*gets cancer*
Come on mouss, shut up for once. You literally give me more cancer than Bob did 2 years ago, which is hell of an achievement.That's rude to Bob.
Dw bannerlords is out this decade. Not long let's prepare. The game is dying, I remember the old days, guys it's just a game, salt, cancer, memes.
All the above is gey shutup fags and stab each other u pre-pubescent bitchez.
Awww forgot the other 2?Lol Mouss you really are not funny. I don't think anyone finds your jokes funny. I just forgot what the rounds were before the reset -_-
Don't worry Salakien, one day I might figure out if you have any other reason to dislike me other than we beat your regiment over and over again.
you did it twice - gratz :)
How did you not already have it?Guys its just a game*gets cancer*
Don't think that so many people, like many of you call, will enjoy palying native, ofc it's reworked and all, but still Native ;)
Guys,it's just a game,stop cancer*gets cancer for the 3rd time*
Dw bannerlords is out this decade. Not long let's prepare. The game is dying, I remember the old days, guys it's just a game, salt, cancer, memes.
All the above is gey shutup fags and stab each other u pre-pubescent bitchez.
Hey, you wanna play the game, you gotta deal with the (potential) pain.(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic1.fjcdn.com%2Fthumbnails%2Fcomments%2F4892289%2B_1f140036e9fc61fedb917f5294829ded.jpg&hash=fb932384b96fccce1807dc8a314bb8cc390241b2)
Come on mouss, shut up for once. You literally give me more cancer than Bob did 2 years ago, which is hell of an achievement.
Just ignore Mouss guys, he actually thinks that spewing hate and silliness at everyone in the community using big bad words will make people appreciate him. Hey though, he was officer in the 15th!!!!!!!!!!
So i heard a lot of fantastic news from 18e - i RQ from RGL match and Max1m join 15th :)he probs joined 15th so he cant be called shit
Spoiler(https://i.imgur.com/zr5BUBb.jpg)[close]
Nice saying it twiceWe should help the cancerous community to let the Price in coz it's not fucking funny you racist!
Asked for Names put names famSpoiler(https://i.imgur.com/zr5BUBb.jpg)[close]
So why exactly are you including falk and me in this ?xd
Who is being racist? Nobody is being racist.Nice saying it twiceWe should help the cancerous community to let the Price in coz it's not fucking funny you racist!
Falk isn't in it?
Do you understand the fucking situation???Who is being racist? Nobody is being racist.Nice saying it twiceWe should help the cancerous community to let the Price in coz it's not fucking funny you racist!
Tbh I never cared enough :PFalk isn't in it?
Who do you think 15th_YR_Col_Escobar is then ?
(https://i.imgur.com/WDwcejm.png)Do you understand the fucking situation???Who is being racist? Nobody is being racist.Nice saying it twiceWe should help the cancerous community to let the Price in coz it's not fucking funny you racist!
You're inglorious basterd,we will help you to disband the 18e to become a normal man!11
So i heard a lot of fantastic news from 18e - i RQ from RGL match and Max1m join 15th :)he probs joined 15th so he cant be called shit
Nah Heinrichs leading skills are probably on par with Pluto's, barely speaks english the welsh bastardSo i heard a lot of fantastic news from 18e - i RQ from RGL match and Max1m join 15th :)he probs joined 15th so he cant be called shit
as well as your leading skills right ?
Nah Heinrichs leading skills are probably on par with Pluto's, barely speaks english the welsh bastardSo i heard a lot of fantastic news from 18e - i RQ from RGL match and Max1m join 15th :)he probs joined 15th so he cant be called shit
as well as your leading skills right ?
well atleast we dont sit in the corner of the map nearly every round :lSo i heard a lot of fantastic news from 18e - i RQ from RGL match and Max1m join 15th :)he probs joined 15th so he cant be called shit
as well as your leading skills right ?
Nah Heinrich, they didn't camp for 10 rounds during their only win against us in NLC either ;)well atleast we dont sit in the corner of the map nearly every round :lSo i heard a lot of fantastic news from 18e - i RQ from RGL match and Max1m join 15th :)he probs joined 15th so he cant be called shit
as well as your leading skills right ?
well atleast we dont sit in the corner of the map nearly every round :lSo i heard a lot of fantastic news from 18e - i RQ from RGL match and Max1m join 15th :)he probs joined 15th so he cant be called shit
as well as your leading skills right ?
Did I say it did? pls dont get mad cos not joining River Gwell atleast we dont sit in the corner of the map nearly every round :lSo i heard a lot of fantastic news from 18e - i RQ from RGL match and Max1m join 15th :)he probs joined 15th so he cant be called shit
as well as your leading skills right ?
yeah but it still doesn't change anything on you being a shitty leader ;)
Did I say it did? pls dont get mad cos not joining River Gwell atleast we dont sit in the corner of the map nearly every round :lSo i heard a lot of fantastic news from 18e - i RQ from RGL match and Max1m join 15th :)he probs joined 15th so he cant be called shit
as well as your leading skills right ?
yeah but it still doesn't change anything on you being a shitty leader ;)
ahahhahaha
Salt? Memes? From the 18e? Never.
Good :DSalt? Memes? From the 18e? Never.
Edited ::)
is it true the 18e has gloriously defeated the hordes of the 15th
Who against Who: Spartans vs 18e
Date: Sunday 18th Sept.
Time: 7 Gmt
Referee (If chosen): Lone
Who against Who: Spartans vs 18e
Date: Sunday 18th Sept.
Time: 7 Gmt
Referee (If chosen): Lone
Lone is bias pls no. We want Goob as ref or we win 20-0.
Who against Who: Spartans vs 18e
Date: Sunday 18th Sept.
Time: 7 Gmt
Referee (If chosen): Lone
Who against Who: K-KA vs 17ecan do it
Date: 02/10
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Need Ref
Server: RGL 2
Who against Who: K-KA vs 17e
Date: 02/10
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): DarkTemplar
Server: RGL 2
I don't have that kind of money wtfWho against Who: K-KA vs 17e
Date: 02/10
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): DarkTemplar
Server: RGL 2
Charge £5 for spec slots ;)
+Who against Who: K-KA vs 17e
Date: 02/10
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): DarkTemplar
Server: RGL 2
Charge £5 for spec slots ;)
wont even be there wtfRIP K-KA.
Bump, Important thread should not be forgotten :P
wont even be there wtfRIP K-KA.
Who against Who: 17e vs 18e
Date: 25/9
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Need ref.
Server: RGL 2 if taken idc others are shit anyways :P
Who against Who: 17e vs 18e
Date: 25/9
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Need ref.
Server: RGL 2 if taken idc others are shit anyways :P
Who against Who: 17e vs 18e
Date: 25/9
Time: 7pm GMT
Referee (If chosen): Need ref.
Server: RGL 2 if taken idc others are shit anyways :P
Who against Who: 72nd vs 66ppAre you sure? I am pretty sure the 2nd of august was last month...
Date: 02/08/16
Time 7:45 GMT
Ref: myself
what a 3rd worlder... doesn't even have a time machine jesusWho against Who: 72nd vs 66ppAre you sure? I am pretty sure the 2nd of august was last month...
Date: 02/08/16
Time 7:45 GMT
Ref: myself
Spartans 17 - 3 18egr8 tactics
GG sorry for like messing around making funny melee formations towards the end my guys were just looking for some enjoyment in getting rekt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIHz_PvMtrQ
too bad the spartans ragequited
Match Spartans vs 66Pp
Server : RGL_2
Ref: Lone & Salakien
Score : 9 : 11
Amazing match
Match Spartans vs 66Pp
Server : RGL_2
Ref: Lone & Salakien
Score : 9 : 11
Amazing match
how did you lose to 18e xD
Unlucky, more like shit.Match Spartans vs 66Pp
Server : RGL_2
Ref: Lone & Salakien
Score : 9 : 11
Amazing match
how did you lose to 18e xD
unlucky :DDDDDD
Unlucky, more like shit.Match Spartans vs 66Pp
Server : RGL_2
Ref: Lone & Salakien
Score : 9 : 11
Amazing match
how did you lose to 18e xD
unlucky :DDDDDD
No the swedes were not playing for Spartans. They were at a GFL match.
Right well I was told by Obelix that the swedes left to play a match so he was obviously lying then.No the swedes were not playing for Spartans. They were at a GFL match.
:o, that gfl match that V75 won by default? :p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBSHtujCSkU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBSHtujCSkU
nice recording, especially the prove of RGL_1 masterrace performance :P
I hardly lag on any server, but rgl 1 is as bad as pieter said.Arctic seems to have some problems atm. If it is too bad, you may play your match on your own server. Just make sure everyone agrees.
rip max1m lolHe will be dealt with.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBSHtujCSkU
nice recording, especially the prove of RGL_1 masterrace performance :P
stop criying about RGL 1 and 3, they are hosted in the UK to avoid that frenchies have the advantage they have at all tournaments,ping like 15, as logical consequence people from netherlands have the feeling it is laggy too, didn't hear one from UK or Germany complaining :P
Who's deleting my provocations for fuck sake?
66Pp 11 - 9 Spartans
18e 3 - 17 Spartans
Needless to say Erebos. Good man :) GG in our match. Hopefully we put up a better fight next time.Who's deleting my provocations for fuck sake?
66Pp 11 - 9 Spartans
18e 3 - 17 Spartans
No need for those kind of posts tbh, I don't think any Spartan did that after any win against the 66pp in previous tournaments.
Who's deleting my provocations for fuck sake?
66Pp 11 - 9 Spartans
18e 3 - 17 Spartans
Video of the highlights from 18e v Spartans;You forgot the link.Video[close]
Don't drink and drive kidsVideo of the highlights from 18e v Spartans;You forgot the link.Video[close]
Rommel you forgot to add the score vs 17e. 6-4 to us
Rommel you forgot to add the score vs 17e. 6-4 to us
Rommel you forgot to add the score vs 17e. 6-4 to us
Well done to the 17e. Deserved win of the match and of the tournament if I'm not mistaken?
GG well played :)
18e >> KKA
Thanks guys for acknowledging our dominance.
One day you will realise that autism is the way forward and I am the king.
Not self proclaimed like kaide though ew
Well done to the 17e. Deserved win of the match and of the tournament if I'm not mistaken?
GG well played :)
Good match indeed, was really intens till the last round :)
Good match indeed, was really intens till the last round :)
topkek, we always had one flank getting destroyed
Good match indeed, was really intens till the last round :)
topkek, we always had one flank getting destroyed
and mid
Good match indeed, was really intens till the last round :)
topkek, we always had one flank getting destroyed
and mid
tibe + me > all of u anyway
SpoilerGood match indeed, was really intens till the last round :)
topkek, we always had one flank getting destroyed
and mid
tibe + me > all of u anyway[close]
we should create our own reg bb :-*
Thanks to organisers for great seasson , there were some problems with servers but we manage to get over there and finish without any huge problems . I hope we can make 1 more RGL before bannerlord come out (20xx) and play together once more .Also congratz to first 3 teams its clear that you are the best right now :)
Came sorta joint 6th with 72nd
I mean we beat 17e 6-4 so its obviously worth it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_HAXwaGahA
here is the match in FULL HD on 60FPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_HAXwaGahA
here is the match in FULL HD on 60FPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
No cuts and bad gameplay! nub confirmed!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_HAXwaGahA
here is the match in FULL HD on 60FPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_HAXwaGahA
here is the match in FULL HD on 60FPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1080 HD and 60 FPS!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_HAXwaGahA
here is the match in FULL HD on 60FPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1080 HD and 60 FPS!!!!
still not german quality
well that was one tense RGL season.
GG GF Sportons for yesterday's match