« Reply #1246 on: March 10, 2019, 08:16:28 pm »
Time to respond to all this shit.
Yoshie
Okay Yoshie has been good for about 2 years but like I stated before and will again here; the comp. scene is very small compared to 2014 or 2016. NA doesn't have that many good players and it shows when it is the same group or people winning the tournaments nowadays. Yoshie has achieved a lot but look at the competition that has been around. Since 2017 it has been LG, 3eVolt, and then everyone else regiment wise. LG dominated the tournament scene in 2017 & a little of 2018 because there wasn't much competition besides a 3eVolt type team & Maccle's inactive team that still manage to finish top 3 in a bunch of tournaments. Why should I give someone a higher rating for doing well the last 2 years with not much competition compared to someone like Swerp for example who has proved it for years when the comp scene was bigger. Yoshie is good and all but I can't bump a guy much higher when he is doing good with barely any competition to challenge him.
MATT
MATT you know you are my GOAT but I can't add a guy to the All-Time list that has used multiple hacks. Maybe some people on the list use autoblock before (I have no clue) but it is hard to add a guy that posted on TKC asking for a shit tons of hacks & got good because of them. Also you have played for a year or so since you did take like a 5 month break so if I did add you it would probably be in the 82-80 range. I would also take into consideration the small comp scene point like I did with Yoshie.
Bean
I did add all those tournaments in the record book btw. In my opinion I think to be on a list you need to be recognized. The way to get recognized as a "good" player is to place top 3 in a tournament, get close to it multiple times to prove that you are top tier, or be one of the top impact players in a tier 1 regiment. One of the requirements I made to be on it was either place top 3 in a tournament or get so close to it a bunch of times (This most likely happens to people when the comp. scene was huge). I added the tournament criteria to being on the list because placing in a tournament does show people that you have proven yourself. Gooner & Windlife I was actually considering to put on the list (Gooner because of how good he was in the early days & Windlife because he proved himself in 2013 & 2018 like Havoc) but they haven't won much or proved it that much. In addition, Windlife didn't play in the comp scene enough to give him that recognition.
bias
I tried very hard to make this list as unbias as possible which I put about 2 weeks of work into this entire thread. The only thing I could see bias is me @85. If it was bias I would put Bill over AsianP since he has been asking me for months to do it. I did put Vetro on the list as a friend because he kept begging me to do it for weeks so I decided to do it to get him to stop annoying me. I didn't think Vetro has proven enough to be on it for various reasons which is why I never wanted him on it in the first place. I did try my very best to make the most accurate list that I could make. I didn't do what Ap0c did and base it on his eye test & just throw players and numbers around. I based it on a number of factors like how much they impacted the regiments they were in, how long did they sustain their top tier melee abilities, how many tournaments they won, and 2 or 3 other factors.
Still didn't address my 2nd place jousting tourney win REEE
Logged
Former: 29th CSjt, 12th Cpl, Nr37 Kpl, 21eme SoD, 18th LtCol, 1stMN/64th SgtMaj, 23rdPA SgtMaj, 45e CplFo, 78th ESO, 29th Capt, 57th Kgm, LG Fus, 71st Cpl, 34e SoD, 2ndQF LCpl, LG Uffz, Nr4 Gmnr, 98e SoD, 75e Fus, 18e FusV, 47th Grd, and 21st Pte.
Self Proclaimed best movement key player NA