Flying Squirrel Entertainment

The Lounge => Forum & Website => Topic started by: Refleax on January 27, 2013, 10:10:15 pm

Title: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Refleax on January 27, 2013, 10:10:15 pm
Hello Everyone,

In light of recent comments and opinions voiced by some of the community, we feel its best to restate the position of FSE in relation to the community and the official servers. The servers which we maintain are done so on a voluntary basis at private expense for the benefit of the public players for the sake of community, we try to host servers that are open to all and and are fun to play on, to the best of our ability.

Now, the difficulty of maintaining these servers is obvious and despite our efforts, there will be failures on the part of the admin team and the owners. As a game development company we have overstepped ourselves when dealing with the community. To that end, we will be making certain changes in regards how FSE deals with the community:

1. FSE will be taking a step back from community altering decisions. In our pursuit of stopping an argument that had been made three times over the possession of the 51st name we rashly decided to remove the object that was contested, instead of punishing the ones who were breaking forum policy. Inadvertently we managed to punish the entire community by removing something that rightfully should have been theirs. For this, we apologize, and will now rectify. We will no longer withhold  any regiment number, even if it proves a source of great controversy and fighting. We will no longer involve ourselves in this process. As such we will return it to the last community member that had possession of said regiment name.

2. Now, even though we are from now going to step back from these kind of decisions and loosen the grip we try to have over the community, there may be a time in the future when such decisions may need to be made. But it will no longer only be in our hands, instead If such a time comes, we will need a base of respected players who can give an informed opinion on such decisions, before we make them. Thus, we will be instituting a new group of players on our forums, the NW Community Representatives. They will be nominated by the community, and will have access to a new forum board area. If FSE sees a need to make a community altering decision, we will first post the proposal of such in this area, in order to gain necessary community feedback so as to make an informed decision. This place will be carefully watched Their opinions will guide our policy, and allow the community a voice to the FSE management.

We will be setting up the Community Representative Process shortly. I look forward to serious dialogue taking place, with real solutions being found with help from both the administration and the community.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Treble on January 27, 2013, 10:12:56 pm
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: USE4life on January 27, 2013, 10:13:19 pm

I think we need a list of demands
  • Kitty removed from her Administrator position
  • The rights to the name of the 51st given to the one who asks for it
  • An official apology from FSE
  • A more universal say in the appointment of administrators (give us a say)
  • Daniel Craig ect un banned from the forums
  • More specific forum rules with new moderators

May be better here
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: 2oothBrush on January 27, 2013, 10:13:31 pm
YOLO
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Gragnok on January 27, 2013, 10:14:31 pm


we will be instituting a new group of players on our forums, the NW Community Representatives. They will be nominated by the community, and will have access to a new forum board area. If FSE sees a need to make a community altering decision, we will first post the proposal of such in this area, in order to gain necessary community feedback so as to make an informed decision. This place will be carefully watched Their opinions will guide our policy, and allow the community a voice to the FSE management.


Excellent news.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: James Stewart on January 27, 2013, 10:15:46 pm
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Harbinger on January 27, 2013, 10:16:40 pm
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.
:|
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Flash on January 27, 2013, 10:17:10 pm
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.

#tav4admin2013
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Ste on January 27, 2013, 10:17:21 pm
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.
I hate to admit it but: tav is...right
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Affjoris on January 27, 2013, 10:17:53 pm
Still no sigh of unbanning Craig and Daniel etc.

Seeing as they where a few of the first who pointed you at those issues you are resolving right now, and how their unban was on most of the TO DO list, i say it would only be fair to unban them.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: TORN on January 27, 2013, 10:18:30 pm
Great response!
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Odysseus on January 27, 2013, 10:18:33 pm
Commence the unbans... Also, I want more info on these "representatives"
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: av3ng3r on January 27, 2013, 10:18:55 pm
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.

#tav4admin2013

Oh god. The irony....
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Ronan6793 on January 27, 2013, 10:19:29 pm
Am I the only one who doesn't care about the Damn regiments, I care more about the admins and think we should Help FSE to create a new way of Choosing admins, My idea is that they should Open a thread to the community asking their opinion on the person Applying and they would then decide Yes or no, Also I think we should Call a vote on the current admins and see the Community's opinion on whether or not they should Keep their Administrative Powers. Finally there should be a Place on the Forums where people Can complain about specific admins if they feel they have been Mistreated.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: GrantyPooh on January 27, 2013, 10:20:44 pm
Am I the only one who doesn't care about the Damn regiments, I care more about the admins and think we should Help FSE to create a new way of Choosing admins, My idea is that they should Open a thread to the community asking their opinion on the person Applying and they would then decide Yes or no, Also I think we should Call a vote on the current admins and see the Community's opinion on whether or not they should Keep their Administrative Powers. Finally there should be a Place on the Forums where people Can complain about specific admins if they feel they have been Mistreated.

Go look at the Champions of Europe thread, see how that turned out.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on January 27, 2013, 10:20:59 pm
Am I the only one who doesn't care about the Damn regiments, I care more about the admins and think we should Help FSE to create a new way of Choosing admins, My idea is that they should Open a thread to the community asking their opinion on the person Applying and they would then decide Yes or no, Also I think we should Call a vote on the current admins and see the Community's opinion on whether or not they should Keep their Administrative Powers. Finally there should be a Place on the Forums where people Can complain about specific admins if they feel they have been Mistreated.

I don't care about the regiments but I do care about them slapping a gag on peoples usage of an in-game regiment.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Budzinskiy on January 27, 2013, 10:22:03 pm
In my mind,a lot of regs have got too much influence and we should break it down now.The regs are the regs,there not here to do the police.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Evanovic on January 27, 2013, 10:22:24 pm
It is good that we see recognition coming from the higher FSE representatives. It's long been my desire to tighten up professionalism in the server administration and improve practice. I've always tried to maintain a blank face when admining on the official servers, any sort of opinion expressed is going to fuel some resentment from one side or another. It's best that admins act as robots and simply enforce rules through reiterating the rules, dealing a measured punishment and nothing more. No attention-seeking, no messing around. At least some progress is being made in this response and I'd love to help in some way with shaping a potential 'professionalisation' of the way things are run.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on January 27, 2013, 10:23:24 pm
In my mind,a lot of regs have got too much influence and we should break it down now.The regs are the regs,there not here to do the police.

That isn't a problem. Regimental leaders can NOT be admins, however.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: TORN on January 27, 2013, 10:23:32 pm
Commence the unbans... Also, I want more info on these "representatives"
2. Now, even though we are from now going to step back from these kind of decisions and loosen the grip we try to have over the community, there may be a time in the future when such decisions may need to be made. But it will no longer only be in our hands, instead If such a time comes, we will need a base of respected players who can give an informed opinion on such decisions, before we make them. Thus, we will be instituting a new group of players on our forums, the NW Community Representatives. They will be nominated by the community, and will have access to a new forum board area. If FSE sees a need to make a community altering decision, we will first post the proposal of such in this area, in order to gain necessary community feedback so as to make an informed decision. This place will be carefully watched Their opinions will guide our policy, and allow the community a voice to the FSE management.

We will be setting up the Community Representative Process shortly. I look forward to serious dialogue taking place, with real solutions being found with help from both the administration and the community.

Have patience.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: USE4life on January 27, 2013, 10:23:41 pm
Am I the only one who doesn't care about the Damn regiments, I care more about the admins and think we should Help FSE to create a new way of Choosing admins, My idea is that they should Open a thread to the community asking their opinion on the person Applying and they would then decide Yes or no, Also I think we should Call a vote on the current admins and see the Community's opinion on whether or not they should Keep their Administrative Powers. Finally there should be a Place on the Forums where people Can complain about specific admins if they feel they have been Mistreated.

Go look at the Champions of Europe thread, see how that turned out.

Invester 2012 came 2nd
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Ronan6793 on January 27, 2013, 10:24:26 pm
Am I the only one who doesn't care about the Damn regiments, I care more about the admins and think we should Help FSE to create a new way of Choosing admins, My idea is that they should Open a thread to the community asking their opinion on the person Applying and they would then decide Yes or no, Also I think we should Call a vote on the current admins and see the Community's opinion on whether or not they should Keep their Administrative Powers. Finally there should be a Place on the Forums where people Can complain about specific admins if they feel they have been Mistreated.

Go look at the Champions of Europe thread, see how that turned out.
It was a Suggestion That appeared as I was Writing it.  First thing to Pop into my head
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Treble on January 27, 2013, 10:24:53 pm
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.


They also need to get rid big headed grammar nazi tits who do nothing but insult people everywhere they go.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Odysseus on January 27, 2013, 10:25:07 pm
Commence the unbans... Also, I want more info on these "representatives"
2. Now, even though we are from now going to step back from these kind of decisions and loosen the grip we try to have over the community, there may be a time in the future when such decisions may need to be made. But it will no longer only be in our hands, instead If such a time comes, we will need a base of respected players who can give an informed opinion on such decisions, before we make them. Thus, we will be instituting a new group of players on our forums, the NW Community Representatives. They will be nominated by the community, and will have access to a new forum board area. If FSE sees a need to make a community altering decision, we will first post the proposal of such in this area, in order to gain necessary community feedback so as to make an informed decision. This place will be carefully watched Their opinions will guide our policy, and allow the community a voice to the FSE management.

We will be setting up the Community Representative Process shortly. I look forward to serious dialogue taking place, with real solutions being found with help from both the administration and the community.

Have patience.
I understand, just wanted to know a bit more about there duties, and when they'll be starting this process.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Audiate on January 27, 2013, 10:25:53 pm
 Finally we make progress as a whole. Please, though, do not transcript the previous discussion over here. Let us all take a minute and prepare for the future, for whatever it may bring, and let us all hope the community representatives will not be selected out of corruption and personal preferences as has done in the past.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Affjoris on January 27, 2013, 10:26:09 pm
Quote
The problem is that our criticisms are valid, but we need to state what we want changed. I was community banned for speaking up against the admins
along with daniel and biggun. I don't think that all the FSE team do an incompotent job, for instance I think Hancock does a great job with the bans and unbans
and acts in a professional manner about such things. Here are a few things that I and I hope most of the community want.

- Re-evaluate your management of the community, and how people are watched/moderated/banned.
- Re-consider people who were given admin who may not be up to the task.
- Stop your blatant favourtisim and biased, to uphold the professionalism of FSE as a company.
- Start treating your community like people you want to keep for the sake of your new game
- Give up on your idea of trying to keep the 51st name, honestly it's offensive to other regiments who have contributed just as much.
- Give community managers to completely Neutral memebrs of the community, who wont have as little bias as possible.
- The developers apologise for how they have been running the community recently, and myself, Daniel, Biggun, Cherry and others are unbanned.

-craig

So how many of these things do we actually see in the OP ?
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Viktor 90th on January 27, 2013, 10:26:14 pm
People wanted change, not a parliament...
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: USE4life on January 27, 2013, 10:26:45 pm
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.


They also need to get rid big headed grammar nazi tits who do nothing but insult people everywhere they go.

The irony
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Treble on January 27, 2013, 10:28:01 pm
Oh indeed, the Irony. Truth hurts though USE. Someone has to say it to him, he gets away with it.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Jacob on January 27, 2013, 10:28:41 pm
I said this on the other thread, but how exactly will the community reps be chosen? as I would like to express my interest in becoming one
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Jock on January 27, 2013, 10:29:27 pm
Nominated by the community. As it says in the OP.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Death by EMP on January 27, 2013, 10:30:22 pm
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
I wholeheartedly agree.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: TORN on January 27, 2013, 10:30:31 pm
I'm also interested in this role.

But I support Sir Audiate for this.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on January 27, 2013, 10:30:42 pm
I said this on the other thread, but how exactly will the community reps be chosen? as I would like to express my interest in becoming one

You? Lmfao? Your nose is rammed between cheeks, son. People like Hekko should get such a role, for they're not afraid to upset Del boy Trotter (vince).
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Ronan6793 on January 27, 2013, 10:31:23 pm
This might sound a Little extreme but what about removing all Admins apart from FSE and pretty much starting from scratch?
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Cherry#YOLO on January 27, 2013, 10:32:58 pm
I said this on the other thread, but how exactly will the community reps be chosen? as I would like to express my interest in becoming one

(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fd22zlbw5ff7yk5.cloudfront.net%2Fimages%2Fcm-21545-650528a3316409.gif&hash=ee245987ef3dc13ef49927c98f4062842883df3e)
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Sanderos25 on January 27, 2013, 10:33:24 pm
Where is the rest of the responce.. This can't be it right? they only missed like 20 topics... and representatives? could it be any more vage? who appoints those people, wait we are back at step one, no progress.. this is not a responce, this is a popularity contest according to FSE
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: USE4life on January 27, 2013, 10:33:36 pm
This might sound a Little extreme but what about removing all Admins apart from FSE and pretty much starting from scratch?

Spoiler
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_mc9a36AyEZ1qhzm9zo1_500.jpg&hash=595864aee3196110fbc8ec203f60593559e48ef0)
[close]
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Xeroth on January 27, 2013, 10:35:36 pm
This community is more messed up then the administrators, in my opinion.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Deofuta on January 27, 2013, 10:35:43 pm
I said this on the other thread, but how exactly will the community reps be chosen? as I would like to express my interest in becoming one

Hey!

Just made a post about it, should be in this same area. Check it out!

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=2663.msg75558#msg75558
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Kator Viridian on January 27, 2013, 10:39:14 pm
The representatives are only going to be of use IF they can select admins for the official servers, as they are dubbed "Official" they are surely for the community as a whole and represent FSE. If the representatives only have power over the forum administration and not the server administration for the Official servers you will still have the exact same problem and will be looking at the same problem 1 month down the line.

If the official servers are Vincenzo's servers and he wishes to pick his own admins then really they should be dubbed something else other than "Official" as "Official" would be a misleading title towards the servers if they are not represeted by community admins chosen by the community.

Makes sense I would think?
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: MaHuD on January 27, 2013, 10:43:46 pm
The way I read it, representatives will be able to voice the needs of the entire community better.
So yes that is inclusive of the MP aspect.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Treble on January 27, 2013, 10:45:48 pm
Then said people should people who are not involved. People like Hekko or Tav are involved. People on the FSE team or admin team are involved. The people shouldn't be involved. It also helps if they aren't "famous"on youtube due to the fact they get subscribers to just vote for them.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Sanderos25 on January 27, 2013, 11:17:34 pm
This is the downfall of FSE, such a weak response for such a well put together charge. The representatives they speak about are not going to have power to do anything, FSE has never cared for the community, remember MM? pay 10 euro's for an update and give it a different label. I agree with Hekko, once FSE decided to make NW a product they are responsible for the quality of it and gaurd it's community not dictate it.

The representatives idea is a popularity contest not a sign of some sort of democracy(which would be even worse). The representatives are gonna have as much power as the FSE crew will allow them, these reps will not be able to overrule FSE and their point will be to prevent this from happening again, the community complaining too much.

This answer from FSE is well put together in a way that he sounds as a politician, saying a lot of words while saying nothing at all. how many "grievances" did Hekko point out? and how many responces you see from FSE, the whole theme of Hekko's essay was ignored, that FSE does not support people that support the community, apearantly helping the community is a bad thing here, that was his point with 20 examples. and this responce can simply be added to the list, FSE coming with a hippy idea that sounds like they make the world a better place to live, while in fact they secure their grasp on the community.

The thing FSE needs to do is promote investing in the community, but no, once again someone is raising his voice against FSE, what are their options? 1. listen to him, 2. ban him, 3. take his support away by empty promises. Personally I love it when people compain about my work, it helps me to make my product better. but FSE has it's mind at Battlecry of Freedom, and doesn't want to spend too much time in NW, so what better to appoint some people that do it for you while pleasing the community by saying they are their leaders, while only having to kick out the ones that cause too much trouble, daily maintanaince of NW reduced to 5 minutes! Win! and so far the people on this thread are buying it
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Doctor Scherzando on January 28, 2013, 12:39:10 am
Perhaps everyone should just calm their nips. I cannot be the only one who simply did not care one way or the other about the 51st business. The main reason why the "community is failing" is because most of you take things way to seriously for a game.  Personally I think this thread, and any other thread making complaints (not suggestions, just complaints) ought to be locked. Unless you people have an idea to make things better, just be quiet and quit whining. So, following my own rule I have a suggestion to improve the quality of the community:
Quit talking about the "community" as if it is one single entity. There are a few people that say stupid crap, but the majority of the chatter is now just complaining about it. It's like a bunch of people just hopped on the bandwagon and began ragging on "that damned community".

In summary, complaining is pointless, instead you should offer suggestions to improve or fix a problem. And stop pretending that this is like the Pentagon. We are just a group of people playing a game and it seems like you guys think it's a matter of life and death.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: James Stewart on January 28, 2013, 12:41:18 am
I said this on the other thread, but how exactly will the community reps be chosen? as I would like to express my interest in becoming one
Poeple like you shouldn't get it. It should be people who will fight for the betterment of the community and who will not bend their back to appease the FSE administration staff. Hekko would be a prime example, long live NSMNW!
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 28, 2013, 12:58:18 am
Perhaps everyone should just calm their nips. I cannot be the only one who simply did not care one way or the other about the 51st business. The main reason why the "community is failing" is because most of you take things way to seriously for a game.  Personally I think this thread, and any other thread making complaints (not suggestions, just complaints) ought to be locked. Unless you people have an idea to make things better, just be quiet and quit whining. So, following my own rule I have a suggestion to improve the quality of the community:
Quit talking about the "community" as if it is one single entity. There are a few people that say stupid crap, but the majority of the chatter is now just complaining about it. It's like a bunch of people just hopped on the bandwagon and began ragging on "that damned community".

In summary, complaining is pointless, instead you should offer suggestions to improve or fix a problem. And stop pretending that this is like the Pentagon. We are just a group of people playing a game and it seems like you guys think it's a matter of life and death.

To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Odysseus on January 28, 2013, 01:01:24 am
Perhaps everyone should just calm their nips. I cannot be the only one who simply did not care one way or the other about the 51st business. The main reason why the "community is failing" is because most of you take things way to seriously for a game.  Personally I think this thread, and any other thread making complaints (not suggestions, just complaints) ought to be locked. Unless you people have an idea to make things better, just be quiet and quit whining. So, following my own rule I have a suggestion to improve the quality of the community:
Quit talking about the "community" as if it is one single entity. There are a few people that say stupid crap, but the majority of the chatter is now just complaining about it. It's like a bunch of people just hopped on the bandwagon and began ragging on "that damned community".

In summary, complaining is pointless, instead you should offer suggestions to improve or fix a problem. And stop pretending that this is like the Pentagon. We are just a group of people playing a game and it seems like you guys think it's a matter of life and death.

To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".
that was one of the most generalized, stupid, uninformed and biased posts I have ever seen.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Audiate on January 28, 2013, 01:02:28 am
To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".

 That sounds like racism. "I like Americans, I play a lot of games with them." I'm NA, not many people know that for some strange reason. Windbusche is NA, Xeroth is NA, Crawford is NA, Odyseuss is NA, Stubbs is NA, Thundersnow is NA, Cop is NA, Menelaos is NA, dare I go on?

 Don't sully the name of NA players on the accounts of the occasional troll; which might I add, is a universal trait.

that was one of the most generalized, stupid, uninformed and biased posts I have ever seen.

 Now now, Ody... that's probably where he's coming from.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Doctor Scherzando on January 28, 2013, 01:02:41 am
Well, I'm not going to argue against or for anyone here, but my point is, the most BASIC rule for dealing with trolls is ignoring them. There are more whiners than trolls.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Affjoris on January 28, 2013, 01:04:18 am
To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".

 That sounds like racism. "I like Americans, I play a lot of games with them." I'm NA, not many people know that for some strange reason. Windbusche is NA, Xeroth is NA, Crawford is NA, Odyseuss is NA, Stubbs is NA, Thundersnow is NA, Cop is NA, Menelaos is NA, dare I go on?

 Don't sully the name of NA players on the accounts of the occasional troll; which might I add, is a universal trait.

Odyseuss is actually canadian. But your point is valid.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 28, 2013, 01:04:31 am
Perhaps everyone should just calm their nips. I cannot be the only one who simply did not care one way or the other about the 51st business. The main reason why the "community is failing" is because most of you take things way to seriously for a game.  Personally I think this thread, and any other thread making complaints (not suggestions, just complaints) ought to be locked. Unless you people have an idea to make things better, just be quiet and quit whining. So, following my own rule I have a suggestion to improve the quality of the community:
Quit talking about the "community" as if it is one single entity. There are a few people that say stupid crap, but the majority of the chatter is now just complaining about it. It's like a bunch of people just hopped on the bandwagon and began ragging on "that damned community".

In summary, complaining is pointless, instead you should offer suggestions to improve or fix a problem. And stop pretending that this is like the Pentagon. We are just a group of people playing a game and it seems like you guys think it's a matter of life and death.

To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".
that was one of the most generalized, stupid, uninformed and biased posts I have ever seen.

Not really... In MM the NA community was tiny, and mostly respectful, nice guys. Not evben a community, 95% of US players were integrated into the EU scene. Then NW was released and the NA scene went tit's up. I know so many veterans of the MM days who even though i might not agree with were still respectfull, nice guys. That isn't what it is now. I'm not sure what prof you want me to give, but a trip to The NA groupfighting servers, official US1 servers gives you a great impression of the community. Hell, even alot of the old posts i can flag up from Taleworlds forums will show that.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Odysseus on January 28, 2013, 01:05:28 am
To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".

 That sounds like racism. "I like Americans, I play a lot of games with them." I'm NA, not many people know that for some strange reason. Windbusche is NA, Xeroth is NA, Crawford is NA, Odyseuss is NA, Stubbs is NA, Thundersnow is NA, Cop is NA, Menelaos is NA, dare I go on?

 Don't sully the name of NA players on the accounts of the occasional troll; which might I add, is a universal trait.

Odyseuss is actually canadian. But your point is valid.
Canada is in North America  :P

Anyway, my post may have been harsh, but what you say is not the truth.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Audiate on January 28, 2013, 01:07:12 am
Odyseuss is actually canadian. But your point is valid.

 NA = North America
 Canada is in North America.

Spoiler
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi159.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ft132%2Ftheinfamoustimmy%2FTheMoreYouKnow.gif&hash=480ecfd59049804add8f34e4c3d3ea1cb8a743e1)
[close]

 UGH, today has made me pay no attention to "post has been made yada yada"...
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Affjoris on January 28, 2013, 01:07:20 am
To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".

 That sounds like racism. "I like Americans, I play a lot of games with them." I'm NA, not many people know that for some strange reason. Windbusche is NA, Xeroth is NA, Crawford is NA, Odyseuss is NA, Stubbs is NA, Thundersnow is NA, Cop is NA, Menelaos is NA, dare I go on?

 Don't sully the name of NA players on the accounts of the occasional troll; which might I add, is a universal trait.

Odyseuss is actually canadian. But your point is valid.
Canada is in North America  :P

Anyway, my post may have been harsh, but what you say is not the truth.

Jep, i read NA as USA. Whoeps. Well, carry on with your discussion and ignore this silly european.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 28, 2013, 01:07:58 am
Perhaps everyone should just calm their nips. I cannot be the only one who simply did not care one way or the other about the 51st business. The main reason why the "community is failing" is because most of you take things way to seriously for a game.  Personally I think this thread, and any other thread making complaints (not suggestions, just complaints) ought to be locked. Unless you people have an idea to make things better, just be quiet and quit whining. So, following my own rule I have a suggestion to improve the quality of the community:
Quit talking about the "community" as if it is one single entity. There are a few people that say stupid crap, but the majority of the chatter is now just complaining about it. It's like a bunch of people just hopped on the bandwagon and began ragging on "that damned community".

In summary, complaining is pointless, instead you should offer suggestions to improve or fix a problem. And stop pretending that this is like the Pentagon. We are just a group of people playing a game and it seems like you guys think it's a matter of life and death.

To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".
How is that fair? What you said is basically the same thing as labeling an entire regiment as trolls because some guy form that regiment made a disruption on the forums or on servers. The NA population is as much a part of the community as the EU population; we are people too, and we play the game and play on the server just as much as you do. The labels you have suggested are way out of proportion, as they could very well be applied to many of the EU population. There are those who are respectable (you said it yourself), and there are those who are not, in every single population in the world. It is very ignorant to apply them to any one population. "It takes one to know one." to put it crudely.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 28, 2013, 01:08:44 am
To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".

 That sounds like racism. "I like Americans, I play a lot of games with them." I'm NA, not many people know that for some strange reason. Windbusche is NA, Xeroth is NA, Crawford is NA, Odyseuss is NA, Stubbs is NA, Thundersnow is NA, Cop is NA, Menelaos is NA, dare I go on?

 Don't sully the name of NA players on the accounts of the occasional troll; which might I add, is a universal trait.

that was one of the most generalized, stupid, uninformed and biased posts I have ever seen.

 Now now, Ody... that's probably where he's coming from.

Again, i said there are exceptions. Of course i dont play with all of you. And i said there are some who will know who they are. A quick example, the groupfighting tournaments teams names is a quick one that comes to mind? Calling yourself the Nazi party is a totally cool way of representing your gf team? Thats the kind of thing that is rampant and goes unchecked. I'm sorry you dont like it, but i do play on US servers (under aliases as my ping sucks) and i see it.

As i said, plenty of good hearted players. But it's the rabble the runs the roost.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Odysseus on January 28, 2013, 01:09:54 am
Still doesn't mean the NA players shouldn't be a part of this.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 28, 2013, 01:12:13 am
Still doesn't mean the NA players shouldn't be a part of this.

No.. but if you read my post i said when there wasn't these seperate NA and EU communities, i didn't find it as bad. There was the general bad players who want to mess things up that you get, but when the Na was primarily playing in EU's backyard(before NA was a real community) then the quality of players was higher.

Perhaps i worded it badly. But that's what i meant. the US servers these days are far worse than EU, for whatever reason it may be, and that ripples throughout the US community. At least in a public server scenario.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Doctor Scherzando on January 28, 2013, 01:12:58 am
All of you failed to see the point of my post, I see. Despite his generalization, I still couldn't care less. It's stupid drama that ought to be left alone. This'll be my last post here, I suggest all of you just suck up whatever rage you have and keep it off the forums.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 28, 2013, 01:17:31 am
If we, the NW community, are going to have any structure and relation left, this EU vs NA stuff needs to stop. We are one community. We come from across the world, from many backgrounds, but we all share the same interest: the Napoleonic Wars. That is why we're here. We are not here to bandy words and argue about who's better, because no one is better than anyone else. Sure, there may be those who are annoying, trollish, etc. etc. but if we become elitist and feel superior towards them, we make ourselves no better than they are. Play the game; enjoy each other's company; it really is an amazing thing that we can come together from such a distance, and that is what we should treasure and keep in our minds.

E pluribus unum.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 28, 2013, 01:20:44 am
An olive branch.....

I hereby apologise to any americans or players in an NA based timezone that i have offended. I merely wished to stress, that before there were NA servers that the percentage of MM that was US based was very very small, almost insignificant if you don't find that too rude. It was with the advent of steam sales for NW really that the NA community grew at a huge rate. Before that you would be more likely to see lone NA players who conducted themselves to a high standard whenever you would meet them.

I am sorry, but in my view it has turned to the oposite. The NA players who are respectful, considerate and engage in a friendly manner is now the minority in the macro scale. I'm not saying you are all assholes. But that for some reason the culture of the US community is different to the EU one, and perhaps it is my fault for not being able to reconcile that gap of behaviours in my mind.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Xeroth on January 28, 2013, 01:21:54 am
If we, the NW community, are going to have any structure and relation left, this EU vs NA stuff needs to stop. We are one community. We come from across the world, from many backgrounds, but we all share the same interest: the Napoleonic Wars. That is why we're here. We are not here to bandy words and argue about who's better, because no one is better than anyone else. Sure, there may be those who are annoying, trollish, etc. etc. but if we become elitist and feel superior towards them, we make ourselves no better than they are. Play the game; enjoy each other's company; it really is an amazing thing that we can come together from such a distance, and that is what we should treasure and keep in our minds.

E pluribus unum.


+1000
Well said, McEwan, i can't agree any more.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Frederickson on January 28, 2013, 01:43:52 am
An olive branch.....

I hereby apologise to any americans or players in an NA based timezone that i have offended. I merely wished to stress, that before there were NA servers that the percentage of MM that was US based was very very small, almost insignificant if you don't find that too rude. It was with the advent of steam sales for NW really that the NA community grew at a huge rate. Before that you would be more likely to see lone NA players who conducted themselves to a high standard whenever you would meet them.

I am sorry, but in my view it has turned to the oposite. The NA players who are respectful, considerate and engage in a friendly manner is now the minority in the macro scale. I'm not saying you are all assholes. But that for some reason the culture of the US community is different to the EU one, and perhaps it is my fault for not being able to reconcile that gap of behaviours in my mind.

I agree on that point vorlen, there are tons of disrespectful immature people who are NA (there is a lot of EUs too, but from my experience the idiot NAs are far more prevalent in being seen.) this is one of the reason I stuck close to the EU part of the community despite being NA myself.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: James Stewart on January 28, 2013, 01:45:56 am
If we, the NW community, are going to have any structure and relation left, this EU vs NA stuff needs to stop. We are one community. We come from across the world, from many backgrounds, but we all share the same interest: the Napoleonic Wars. That is why we're here. We are not here to bandy words and argue about who's better, because no one is better than anyone else. Sure, there may be those who are annoying, trollish, etc. etc. but if we become elitist and feel superior towards them, we make ourselves no better than they are. Play the game; enjoy each other's company; it really is an amazing thing that we can come together from such a distance, and that is what we should treasure and keep in our minds.

E pluribus unum.
Slurp slurp.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Bashy on January 28, 2013, 01:46:58 am
The local ice cream man is called Mr Slurpy, although I do prefer Mr Whippy
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Karth on January 28, 2013, 06:58:37 am
An olive branch.....

I hereby apologise to any americans or players in an NA based timezone that i have offended. I merely wished to stress, that before there were NA servers that the percentage of MM that was US based was very very small, almost insignificant if you don't find that too rude. It was with the advent of steam sales for NW really that the NA community grew at a huge rate. Before that you would be more likely to see lone NA players who conducted themselves to a high standard whenever you would meet them.

I am sorry, but in my view it has turned to the oposite. The NA players who are respectful, considerate and engage in a friendly manner is now the minority in the macro scale. I'm not saying you are all assholes. But that for some reason the culture of the US community is different to the EU one, and perhaps it is my fault for not being able to reconcile that gap of behaviours in my mind.

Some of us NA are a'holes, but I've also had way more than enough EU a'holes trolls who ruin the game experience for others.  In the end it's just the person.  Yes cultures are very different, but Im just saying you shouldn't differentiate besides time zone.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: InfamousBeats on January 28, 2013, 12:19:18 pm
An olive branch.....

I hereby apologise to any americans or players in an NA based timezone that i have offended. I merely wished to stress, that before there were NA servers that the percentage of MM that was US based was very very small, almost insignificant if you don't find that too rude. It was with the advent of steam sales for NW really that the NA community grew at a huge rate. Before that you would be more likely to see lone NA players who conducted themselves to a high standard whenever you would meet them.

I am sorry, but in my view it has turned to the oposite. The NA players who are respectful, considerate and engage in a friendly manner is now the minority in the macro scale. I'm not saying you are all assholes. But that for some reason the culture of the US community is different to the EU one, and perhaps it is my fault for not being able to reconcile that gap of behaviours in my mind.

Some of us NA are a'holes, but I've also had way more than enough EU a'holes trolls who ruin the game experience for others.  In the end it's just the person.  Yes cultures are very different, but Im just saying you shouldn't differentiate besides time zone.

I feel that you are slightly missing the point here. I am part of an NA/EU regiment, and I've always been part of these types of regiments. And although I love the fact that we can have a community with mixed nationalities and players across the world, statistics can hardly be ignored. True, reall statistics do not exist, and this is probably for the best, considering all the drama it may cause. But when simply looking at what I experience ("statistics") ingame and e.g. in TeamSpeaks I tend to agree with some of Vorlens points.

When looking at NA members, I am often confronted with forms of rasicm, trolling and insults that are simply way less common in the EU community. I see references to the KKK, nazis/hitler, the holocaust, and the list goes on. This may be only a small group, yet it is still a much more present group than within the EU community. This is something I find disturbing and perhaps Vorlen began the topic wrong, it should still be recognized and addressed.

Although I haven't been around long enough to see how things were in MM, I don't think we should consider merging the communities or something comparable. Cultures differ and it is a shame that we are now focussing one just one (bad) trait of the NA community. But it remains important that we all remember that we are speaking about a small part of the NA community, and that most others are simply good guys.

Generalization is something we should avoid, although simply pointing these things out (the disturbing size of this group within the NA community, compared to EU) should not be received with such hate (even though, like I said before, the point could have been introduced more diplomatic) because this will only fuel further heated discussions.

Perhaps this makes an evenly spread between EU and NA representatives important. And an important virtue all of them should have is not just being unbiased with regards to regiments and friends, but also with regards to nationalities and heritage.

Thank you for reading, and do note I am just pointing out how I feel about this.

- Infamous
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Deofuta on January 28, 2013, 04:35:43 pm
I would also put in that, like certain EU regiments that only participate in private events, there are many NA coalitions of regiments that participate in their own events as well. Gaining a true tally of either community would be quite difficult.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Jocam on January 28, 2013, 04:49:27 pm
The community representatives are indeed a good idea, but I do notice a flaw here, same as the selection of admins:

1. Not even near all the members will agree with the people FSE installs.
2. FSE abosutely must be certainthat named representatives aren't trolls. (I am not accusing anyone, let it be clear)
3. As mentioned, FSE mustn't make rashed decisions, like seems to be done with the Administrators.
3b. Especially with community representatives, It should be a wide selection, in my opinion more like 20 people, of various nationalities. So that they can communicate properly with native speakers. And the process really should be a delicate one. (e.g. going on the servers themselves to find out what people think, and, if nessecary, USE the community, such as contacting the regiments to ask whom they think fit for the job.)

thanks in advance, and, as always, much sincerely yours,


Jocam
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 28, 2013, 05:13:32 pm
As to your 3rd point.

I agree, no administration should make rushed or rash decisions. The fact of this particular case however, or these decisions, i.e. the reinstating of the 51st name, the nominations for Community Reps, all those were decisions, were forced to be rushed into play by Hekko's thread. These very things, and more, would have been made clear to this community over this week, as the administration was, as I have said in other threads, "literally in the process of working out reformations to the forum and server policies."

It is not the administration's fault in the slightest that the decisions they are making are seemingly rushed, maybe even inadequate, and that's because Hekko rashly forced their hand when they were not ready, therefore creating a much bigger splash effect in this once friendly community than there should have been. This effects everyone, including Hekko and the administration team, and you, and me.

It could have been avoided.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Hekko on January 28, 2013, 05:20:27 pm
As to your 3rd point.

I agree, no administration should make rushed or rash decisions. The fact of this particular case however, or these decisions, i.e. the reinstating of the 51st name, the nominations for Community Reps, all those were decisions, were forced to be rushed into play by Hekko's thread. These very things, and more, would have been made clear to this community over this week, as the administration was, as I have said in other threads, "literally in the process of working out reformations to the forum and server policies."

It is not the administration's fault in the slightest that the decisions they are making are seemingly rushed, maybe even inadequate, and that's because Hekko rashly forced their hand when they were not ready, therefore creating a much bigger splash effect in this once friendly community than there should have been. This effects everyone, including Hekko and the administration team, and you, and me.

It could have been avoided.

I might as well put it here since the original thread got locked:

And people say that there was ways to avoid the scandal, this conveniently circumvents the fact that the culture is that you have to be buddies with Vince to be heard, and you don't become his buddy by voicing dissenting opinions. Accordingly you have a bunch of yesmen at the top that just smile and nod as they are moving from one folly to another, Hancock is a senior member of the administrative team yet he was kept in the dark as far as I know, probably because he is not affraid to speak his mind. The whole community representative thing is as ill adviced as the 51st decision, I hope I am wrong but I doubt it. The root of the problem is that Vince isn't answerable to anyone, which will not change with the solution presented. And that is ultimately why this thread had to be here, infront of everyone, Vince and FSE need to have a rude awakening about the fact that they are a business, and as a business they are answerable to the customers who ultimately pay their salary.

For your last point, don't you think that the rash choice was to do as they did in the 51st case, don't you think the rash choice was to community ban Daniel, Hatake and Biggun, don't you think it was a rash choice to follow them to a forum that they previously have severed all ties with.

As a side note, you are also breaking the secrecy rule for the inter-admin forum, something I have caught alot of flak from.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: TORN on January 28, 2013, 05:23:35 pm
Well by the looks of it with the representatives is that the community will poll for the top 10.
I'm afraid that all the 'popular kids' will be chosen.

Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Gragnok on January 28, 2013, 05:28:30 pm
There are flaws with the plan for community reps but they are in my opinion largely due to the risk that the community wont elect the right people. Not with the plan itself.  However, it could work very well and result in a better situation for everyone. Perhaps we should wait to see how it turns out.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 28, 2013, 05:30:21 pm
I might as well put it here since the original thread got locked:

And people say that there was ways to avoid the scandal, this conveniently circumvents the fact that the culture is that you have to be buddies with Vince to be heard, and you don't become his buddy by voicing dissenting opinions. Accordingly you have a bunch of yesmen at the top that just smile and nod as they are moving from one folly to another, Hancock is a senior member of the administrative team yet he was kept in the dark as far as I know, probably because he is not affraid to speak his mind. The whole community representative thing is as ill adviced as the 51st decision, I hope I am wrong but I doubt it. The root of the problem is that Vince isn't answerable to anyone, which will not change with the solution presented. And that is ultimately why this thread had to be here, infront of everyone, Vince and FSE need to have a rude awakening about the fact that they are a business, and as a business they are answerable to the customers who ultimately pay their salary.

For your last point, don't you think that the rash choice was to do as they did in the 51st case, don't you think the rash choice was to community ban Daniel, Hatake and Biggun, don't you think it was a rash choice to follow them to a forum that they previously have severed all ties with.

As a side note, you are also breaking the secrecy rule for the inter-admin forum, something I have caught alot of flak from.
I have never said that the administration has not done rash decisions in the past. They have, and that's what they were trying to amend with the well thought out changes they were in the process of making when you posted your thread.

On the topic of Hancock, I will say nothing more than you can't always wait for things to come to you.

On the topic of their current (and rushed, mind you) decisions, only time will tell whether they will make a difference for good or ill. Judgement should be saved only for times when it is needed.

And as a side note, there is nothing in my response that has not already been revealed to the community at large. Deo and maybe other admins have already stated that there would be changes to policy being revealed over the next week.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Wodan All Father on January 28, 2013, 05:41:05 pm
If we, the NW community, are going to have any structure and relation left, this EU vs NA stuff needs to stop. We are one community. We come from across the world, from many backgrounds, but we all share the same interest: the Napoleonic Wars. That is why we're here. We are not here to bandy words and argue about who's better, because no one is better than anyone else. Sure, there may be those who are annoying, trollish, etc. etc. but if we become elitist and feel superior towards them, we make ourselves no better than they are. Play the game; enjoy each other's company; it really is an amazing thing that we can come together from such a distance, and that is what we should treasure and keep in our minds.

E pluribus unum.

This would be the right decision and therefore wont happen ;-) haha. We are stuck in a difficult position where you will get these "Community Representatives" based on who is popular and who the admin team think will calm down the situation but meh im a cynic :P what we also have to take into account is that a large percentage of players in the community (it appears to me at least - please correct me if I'm wrong hehe) tend to be the kind that like their pseudo-elitism in that to their enjoyment of the game its important for them to feel that their regiment is better than another regiment etc etc which is fair enough if that's what they enjoy  :) , and we are at risk of potentially replacing an admin team which didn't behave professionally as a business should with as you say a bunch of "elitist" players who will admin to what they "see" to be wrong etc etc.


Rant over hehe  :P bringing the admin teams of EU & NA would be great so their is one clear set of admins, rules and expectations for people to follow. New admins would need to be respected members of the community from all aspects (bar actual trolls obviously - common sense here please hehe) so that all views on how people like to play the game can be taken into account.

So for example; and this is not <phrase destroyed by political correctness> worshiping Hekko I can't be arsed with that BS but he seems to be a clear candidate who is respected to represent the views of the in want of a better way to phrase is "seriously competitive regiments" out there, you can call me biased but meh - Flashheart would be a good candidate to represent players like myself who want to play competitively but have a laugh whilst doing it and so on, and so forth etc etc.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Deofuta on January 28, 2013, 05:57:51 pm

This would be the right decision and therefore wont happen ;-) haha. We are stuck in a difficult position where you will get these "Community Representatives" based on who is popular and who the admin team think will calm down the situation but meh im a cynic :P what we also have to take into account is that a large percentage of players in the community (it appears to me at least - please correct me if I'm wrong hehe) tend to be the kind that like their pseudo-elitism in that to their enjoyment of the game its important for them to feel that their regiment is better than another regiment etc etc which is fair enough if that's what they enjoy  :) , and we are at risk of potentially replacing an admin team which didn't behave professionally as a business should with as you say a bunch of "elitist" players who will admin to what they "see" to be wrong etc etc.


Apart from each having their one vote as community members, FSE and its support staff have no say in this. Each community member has equal say. How could we possibly appoint anyone in this situation? This is quite possibly the least touched of any policy ever. It is entirely up to the community to vote in those they think can handle the position.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Wodan All Father on January 28, 2013, 06:02:51 pm
Spoiler

This would be the right decision and therefore wont happen ;-) haha. We are stuck in a difficult position where you will get these "Community Representatives" based on who is popular and who the admin team think will calm down the situation but meh im a cynic :P what we also have to take into account is that a large percentage of players in the community (it appears to me at least - please correct me if I'm wrong hehe) tend to be the kind that like their pseudo-elitism in that to their enjoyment of the game its important for them to feel that their regiment is better than another regiment etc etc which is fair enough if that's what they enjoy  :) , and we are at risk of potentially replacing an admin team which didn't behave professionally as a business should with as you say a bunch of "elitist" players who will admin to what they "see" to be wrong etc etc.


Apart from each having their one vote as community members, FSE and its support staff have no say in this. Each community member has equal say. How could we possibly appoint anyone in this situation? This is quite possibly the least touched of any policy ever. It is entirely up to the community to vote in those they think can handle the position.
[close]

Ah right cool I was under the impression they were in charge here also lol. There never was much hope...just a fools hope  ;D
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Jocam on January 28, 2013, 06:04:53 pm
It could have been avoided.

I disagree, I coud only have been postponed. It is better this way, matter like this shouldn't be kept silent
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Deofuta on January 28, 2013, 06:05:41 pm
We are still very much in charge, but in this decision we decided that the best way to approach the community was to let it sort out the representatives themselves.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 28, 2013, 06:24:02 pm
It could have been avoided.

I disagree, I coud only have been postponed. It is better this way, matter like this shouldn't be kept silent
I agree that the drama could only have been postponed. But do you think that if the admins were allowed to release their new policies without Hekko's intervention, the fallout would be as massive as this? Hekko started something more destructive than any of us could have imagined, including him. This rift is now wider than it would have been, and we are all suffering for it.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Jocam on January 28, 2013, 06:43:36 pm
It could have been avoided.

I disagree, I coud only have been postponed. It is better this way, matter like this shouldn't be kept silent
I agree that the drama could only have been postponed. But do you think that if the admins were allowed to release their new policies without Hekko's intervention, the fallout would be as massive as this? Hekko started something more destructive than any of us could have imagined, including him. This rift is now wider than it would have been, and we are all suffering for it.


I partially disagree,

Hekko put in motion the fact that the lesser known members now speak up, if big guys never say anything about this matter, then it would've resulted of the matter being post-poned, which we both agreed on is bad
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 28, 2013, 06:49:47 pm
It could have been avoided.

I disagree, I coud only have been postponed. It is better this way, matter like this shouldn't be kept silent
I agree that the drama could only have been postponed. But do you think that if the admins were allowed to release their new policies without Hekko's intervention, the fallout would be as massive as this? Hekko started something more destructive than any of us could have imagined, including him. This rift is now wider than it would have been, and we are all suffering for it.

Lol... how are we all suffering? Please, explain. You act as if there is one issue at play here. Practically all the dissenting opinions in the main thread were based around what Hekko said about NA servers. which boils down to 1 sentence in a 2000 words essay. From what i can see there are alot of people who are happy that widespread opionions have been stated, and it's a minority of senior US admins and Insiders in the FSE team that are unhappy. Everything carries on as normal for the main part. In another thread someone informed me that "Alot of the REAL US community happens behind closed doors"(paraphrased).

So whats changed? Everything is still the same on the ground level. People are playing with their friends, against likeminded regiments. What is this "Huge rift that has suddenly appeared". There has always been this rift, it was present in MM, the different was that on MM FSE had the popular vote, people had faith, trust and wanted them to be in charge of the community. They were the Demigods. Alot of people and for many reasons, as listed, dont feel like that anymore. And don't aprove of how things have been done.

I dont see much suffering.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 28, 2013, 07:07:41 pm
I am not talking about what the community does. I am talking about what the community is. I for one have, for the 2 years that I've been a part of this community, always taken joy from being in it and interacting with it. We were one of the friendliest and supportive communities in gaming. Other than the occasional troll and regimental dispute (both fairly given events in a gaming community) there were virtually no issues. But starting with the 51st issue, tensions began to rise. Demands were given to the admins, and they though they initially dealt with it the wrong way, they tried to amend it with well thought out changes to policy that would be more fair to the community as a whole.

With Hekko's thread coming out of the blue, the original forum camaraderie and friendliness was shattered. Take one look at that thread, and you will see hostility and disrespectful behavior, the like of which I have never seen in a community such as this. I saw people who used to be friends going at it with each other. While before the event there was a general attitude of support between the members of this community, the attitude during the event was nonexistent. It was free reign, and people took it upon themselves to go full out. There are now those who fully support Hekko, and those who are still loyal to the administration for their continued efforts. There is indeed a rift, Vorlen. It is not the one you are thinking of, as that is something we are currently trying to amend. The more malevolent rift is in the community as a whole, and it is something that will stain this community for a while.

In times like these, no one is left untouched.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Nipplestockings on January 28, 2013, 07:23:01 pm
It could have been avoided.

I disagree, I coud only have been postponed. It is better this way, matter like this shouldn't be kept silent
I agree that the drama could only have been postponed. But do you think that if the admins were allowed to release their new policies without Hekko's intervention, the fallout would be as massive as this? Hekko started something more destructive than any of us could have imagined, including him. This rift is now wider than it would have been, and we are all suffering for it.
I don't think this could have been avoided, or even should have been avoided. A wakeup call was needed, yes, I think we can all agree on that, but I would even go as far as to say that the scale and extremity of the incident shows just how fed up the community was. Nobody can ever hope to suppress feelings like that for such a long period of time, and I think that if this hadn't happened the way it did this time, it would have happened later on a far greater scale. People in the community desperately needed to blow off steam, get their grievances out however they felt they needed to, and vent.

I also think that while it's extremely unfortunate that a huge divide was opened up in the community, it was necessary. The rift was always there - it was just hiding behind formalities, afraid of going against the norm to speak out, and a false hope that that things would change on their own. The community will never be the same after this, but there was too much bullshit from the beginning. It may have seemed like a happy little community before this, but that's a naive thing to believe. Plenty of shit was going on behind the curtains - steam conversations, hostile pm's, passive-aggressive threats and insults.

Now it's all out in the open, and the administration seems to show some sign of changing, but I don't think anyone is satisfied. This community has never, ever been united. I hate the fake formailities, I hate the passive-aggressive bullshit that's all too common when you want to insult someone but you want to do it subtly, so you don't disturb the delusion of peace.

I think that if anything worthwhile is going to change at all, people to drop the notion that we're going to solve anything through things like community representatives. How would a single person be able to represent the entire community? It's clear to everyone now that our sentiments are fractured, so would that ever work with just a single person? That's like the Senate of the US being filled with only Republicans, but they pledge to represent the views of the democrats fairly. It doesn't make sense, and it will collapse upon it self in time.

The whole culture in this community is rotten. Stop trying to act like gentlemen - I bet that the average age in this community is 16-20. It's so fucking fake, just stop it. This community resembles a group of middle school girls who bicker and talk behind each other's backs and consider each other friends, but really they all have problems with each other. These problems will never be solved while people are afraid to speak out. Notice how before this happened, whenever someone expressed a grievance, their threads were either locked, they were banned, or they were shunned by the community. And then once Hekko posted his thread, suddenly these people were the quickest ones to turn and start bashing people left and right. Does that say something about the legitimacy of this community? Yes.

ALSO - How do we deal with the majority of the community, who do not browse the forums? I find on the public servers ever day people who didn't even know there were official forums for NW. Having all the well known members vote on a representative is not going to accomplish anything.

tl;dr - We need more than this; nobody is truly satisfied
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: PrideofNi on January 28, 2013, 07:42:19 pm
He means it was uncalled for because FSE where in the process of reforms before Hekko's post, as he was well aware off. Which makes the situation worse.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: James Stewart on January 28, 2013, 07:45:57 pm
He means it was uncalled for because FSE where in the process of reforms before Hekko's post, as he was well aware off. Which makes the situation worse.
We all know these reforms are just there to appease the community, after a month they will be thrown away and the iron fist restored.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Nipplestockings on January 28, 2013, 07:46:06 pm
He means it was uncalled for because FSE where in the process of reforms before Hekko's post, as he was well aware off. Which makes the situation worse.
No it doesn't. Nobody would have been happy with them, because far, far more is needed than a set of reforms put form by the devs when they didn't have much pressure on them to do so.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: PrideofNi on January 28, 2013, 07:49:49 pm
Well this Community Representative was one policy however Hekko forced their hand so how could they consult the different parties that could help develop the idea when people where spamming for blood? I can't recall anyone suggesting this idea in that rage thread, because there were none. To be frank I am not totally happy with this undeveloped version of it because it is open to abuse from the community and we all know how much people love le drama. Corrie is so boring these days so you know..
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Nipplestockings on January 28, 2013, 07:55:08 pm
Well this Community Representative was one policy however Hekko forced their hand so how could they consult the different parties that could help develop the idea when people where spamming for blood? I can't recall anyone suggesting this idea in that rage thread, because there were none. To be frank I am not totally happy with this undeveloped version of it because it is open to abuse from the community and we all know how much people love le drama. Corrie is so boring these days so you know..
Why did you expect suggestions in a thread like that? Like I said before, that thread was the storm, and the results were the rebuilding - the threads that the devs posted for the community rep and stuff. Both of these were needed.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 28, 2013, 07:59:19 pm
He means it was uncalled for because FSE where in the process of reforms before Hekko's post, as he was well aware off. Which makes the situation worse.
We all know these reforms are just there to appease the community, after a month they will be thrown away and the iron fist restored.
Come back and say that when you can see the future.

He means it was uncalled for because FSE where in the process of reforms before Hekko's post, as he was well aware off. Which makes the situation worse.
No it doesn't. Nobody would have been happy with them, because far, far more is needed than a set of reforms put form by the devs when they didn't have much pressure on them to do so.
Yet another ultimatum. I ask you: how do you know nobody would be happy with them? Nobody can see these things in full clarity. And your statement is very, very self-contradicting, because aren't those sets of reforms what the community wanted in the first place?

Pressure is an unwelcome thing, as it rushes choices and decisions, and deals damage to the quality of those decisions, because they are forced, and therefore don't have the opportunity ot be well thought out and carefully planned.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: James Stewart on January 28, 2013, 08:01:52 pm
He means it was uncalled for because FSE where in the process of reforms before Hekko's post, as he was well aware off. Which makes the situation worse.
We all know these reforms are just there to appease the community, after a month they will be thrown away and the iron fist restored.
Come back and say that when you can see the future.

He means it was uncalled for because FSE where in the process of reforms before Hekko's post, as he was well aware off. Which makes the situation worse.
No it doesn't. Nobody would have been happy with them, because far, far more is needed than a set of reforms put form by the devs when they didn't have much pressure on them to do so.
Yet another ultimatum. I ask you: how do you know nobody would be happy with them? Nobody can see these things in full clarity. And your statement is very, very self-contradicting, because aren't those sets of reforms what the community wanted in the first place?

Pressure is an unwelcome thing, as it rushes choices and decisions, and deals damage to the quality of those decisions, because they are forced, and therefore don't have the opportunity ot be well thought out and carefully planned.
I'll come back in a month or so and say I told you so.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Nipplestockings on January 28, 2013, 08:05:05 pm
Yet another ultimatum. I ask you: how do you know nobody would be happy with them? Nobody can see these things in full clarity. And your statement is very, very self-contradicting, because aren't those sets of reforms what the community wanted in the first place?

Pressure is an unwelcome thing, as it rushes choices and decisions, and deals damage to the quality of those decisions, because they are forced, and therefore don't have the opportunity ot be well thought out and carefully planned.
[/quote]

The community isn't a single entity. I don't think the representative system will work whatsoever, and I have many people who share my view. There are probably people who think it will work, and good for the, but I disagree. This isn't a matter of predicting the future. You always bring that up in arguments, and it really has nothing to do with what I'm saying. I'm not saying I know for sure that the resolutions they would have proposed before this incident would have been unsatisfactory, but they had no reason to believe that anyone would openly oppose them, and anyone who would oppose them could be silenced easily (See: Daniel, Craig, etc.).

Edit - I screwed that quote up good lol
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Xeroth on January 28, 2013, 10:03:52 pm
This community is depriving me of my daily joy.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 28, 2013, 10:08:30 pm
This community is depriving me of my daily joy.
Lately, there has not been much reason to be joyful, which is the really sad thing about this situation. But I'm slowly gaining it back. I feel that there is a new rising on the horizon.

Plus, the MM event tonight has stoked me to HIGH HELL!! ;D
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: PrideofNi on January 28, 2013, 10:10:30 pm
Well this Community Representative was one policy however Hekko forced their hand so how could they consult the different parties that could help develop the idea when people where spamming for blood? I can't recall anyone suggesting this idea in that rage thread, because there were none. To be frank I am not totally happy with this undeveloped version of it because it is open to abuse from the community and we all know how much people love le drama. Corrie is so boring these days so you know..
Why did you expect suggestions in a thread like that? Like I said before, that thread was the storm, and the results were the rebuilding - the threads that the devs posted for the community rep and stuff. Both of these were needed.

Well I would expect solutions. Running around with your hands in the air screaming helps nothing. My point being these things where already in the development stage and now have been rushed out, unfinished and therefore don't blame them if issues arise around them. We could have had so many good changes but alas, this rushed it and something rushed is usually never as good as something well thought out and planned.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Xeroth on January 28, 2013, 10:13:00 pm
This community is depriving me of my daily joy.
Lately, there has not been much reason to be joyful, which is the really sad thing about this situation. But I'm slowly gaining it back. I feel that there is a new rising on the horizon.

Plus, the MM event tonight has stoked me to HIGH HELL!! ;D

I fucking forgot about that, I need to merc for someone. What regiments are going?  :o
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Deofuta on January 28, 2013, 10:42:47 pm
Well this Community Representative was one policy however Hekko forced their hand so how could they consult the different parties that could help develop the idea when people where spamming for blood? I can't recall anyone suggesting this idea in that rage thread, because there were none. To be frank I am not totally happy with this undeveloped version of it because it is open to abuse from the community and we all know how much people love le drama. Corrie is so boring these days so you know..
Why did you expect suggestions in a thread like that? Like I said before, that thread was the storm, and the results were the rebuilding - the threads that the devs posted for the community rep and stuff. Both of these were needed.

Well I would expect solutions. Running around with your hands in the air screaming helps nothing. My point being these things where already in the development stage and now have been rushed out, unfinished and therefore don't blame them if issues arise around them. We could have had so many good changes but alas, this rushed it and something rushed is usually never as good as something well thought out and planned.

I think that, as an advisory board, the comm reps will accomplish what is planned for them easily just by being open in discussion.

The server changes will be a bit more piecemeal than I or Refleax had planned, but overall I think that we will resume normal functions after a couple weeks.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on January 28, 2013, 11:44:04 pm
He means it was uncalled for because FSE where in the process of reforms before Hekko's post, as he was well aware off. Which makes the situation worse.
We all know these reforms are just there to appease the community, after a month they will be thrown away and the iron fist restored.
Come back and say that when you can see the future.

He means it was uncalled for because FSE where in the process of reforms before Hekko's post, as he was well aware off. Which makes the situation worse.
No it doesn't. Nobody would have been happy with them, because far, far more is needed than a set of reforms put form by the devs when they didn't have much pressure on them to do so.
Yet another ultimatum. I ask you: how do you know nobody would be happy with them? Nobody can see these things in full clarity. And your statement is very, very self-contradicting, because aren't those sets of reforms what the community wanted in the first place?

Pressure is an unwelcome thing, as it rushes choices and decisions, and deals damage to the quality of those decisions, because they are forced, and therefore don't have the opportunity ot be well thought out and carefully planned.

Why am I starting to dislike you? Is it the blinded replies of "LOOK AT ME FSE, GIEF ME POWAH, I BE UR SUPORTA". I just can't put my finger on where these assumptions are coming from. I mean, I did read your previous posts and they always seem to be so 'pro-fse', almost as if you are their newly hired salesman.

Vince really ought to be buying you laxatives, I mean it must be hard to continuously lay brown brick after brown brick.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on January 29, 2013, 12:00:44 am
The community isn't a single entity. I don't think the representative system will work whatsoever, and I have many people who share my view. There are probably people who think it will work, and good for the, but I disagree. This isn't a matter of predicting the future. You always bring that up in arguments, and it really has nothing to do with what I'm saying. I'm not saying I know for sure that the resolutions they would have proposed before this incident would have been unsatisfactory, but they had no reason to believe that anyone would openly oppose them, and anyone who would oppose them could be silenced easily (See: Daniel, Craig, etc.).

Edit - I screwed that quote up good lol

I agree, FSE really have proved to share the diplomacy skill of this: [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cg_8knBHEyw[/youtube]
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 29, 2013, 12:22:08 am
Why am I starting to dislike you? Is it the blinded replies of "LOOK AT ME FSE, GIEF ME POWAH, I BE UR SUPORTA". I just can't put my finger on where these assumptions are coming from. I mean, I did read your previous posts and they always seem to be so 'pro-fse', almost as if you are their newly hired salesman.

Vince really ought to be buying you laxatives, I mean it must be hard to continuously lay brown brick after brown brick.
The only thing that matters to me in this instant is that your responses mean nothing to me, and to countless others who are supporters of this community, because you have no respect for it. Blatant trolling and instigatory messages get nobody anywhere and only create the things the community want to see gone: malcontent, hostility, and drama.

Maybe I am sucking up to the administration. Maybe I'm not. In the end it really doesn't matter, as all either shows is that I care. How can I make a difference in the community if I do not have the privileges I need to do so? I consider myself a dedicated member of this community, for 2 years, and have worked to make it a friendly place for people of the same interests. I have risen in status, and somehow survive to wish to rise higher, like those like MaHud, Refleax, Deo, and all those others who think of this community as a source of joy.

I really couldn't care less that you don't like me. Nobody can like everybody. You have your opinion, and I have mine, and there is no reason why you shouldn't share it and support it. But I swear to you, if you continue what you are doing now, you will find yourself done and gone from these forums, for there is nothing worse than a person whose sole purpose is to troll.

This thread has been polluted enough. I will leave you to your own devices, and I hope that you will make the right decisions as a member of this community.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Nipplestockings on January 29, 2013, 12:33:17 am
Why am I starting to dislike you? Is it the blinded replies of "LOOK AT ME FSE, GIEF ME POWAH, I BE UR SUPORTA". I just can't put my finger on where these assumptions are coming from. I mean, I did read your previous posts and they always seem to be so 'pro-fse', almost as if you are their newly hired salesman.

Vince really ought to be buying you laxatives, I mean it must be hard to continuously lay brown brick after brown brick.
The only thing that matters to me in this instant is that your responses mean nothing to me, and to countless others who are supporters of this community, because you have no respect for it. Blatant trolling and instigatory messages get nobody anywhere and only create the things the community want to see gone: malcontent, hostility, and drama.

Maybe I am sucking up to the administration. Maybe I'm not. In the end it really doesn't matter, as all either shows is that I care. How can I make a difference in the community if I do not have the privileges I need to do so? I consider myself a dedicated member of this community, for 2 years, and have worked to make it a friendly place for people of the same interests. I have risen in status, and somehow survive to wish to rise higher, like those like MaHud, Refleax, Deo, and all those others who think of this community as a source of joy.

I really couldn't care less that you don't like me. Nobody can like everybody. You have your opinion, and I have mine, and there is no reason why you shouldn't share it and support it. But I swear to you, if you continue what you are doing now, you will find yourself done and gone from these forums, for there is nothing worse than a person whose sole purpose is to troll.

This thread has been polluted enough. I will leave you to your own devices, Sid, and I hope that you will make the right decisions as a member of this community.

His sole purpose is to troll? Do you even know what trolling is? I'm pretty sure he has valid opinions and he's rightfully angry. When someone harshly criticizes you, they are not trolling. I know you like to label your adversaries as trolls so they'll lose credibility in the eyes of others, but sometimes people get legitimately irritated, and that is nothing like trolling.

Here, be enlightened
   
Spoiler
Trolling is trying to get a rise out of someone. Forcing them to respond to you, either through wise-crackery, posting incorrect information, asking blatantly stupid questions, or other foolishness. However, trolling statements are never true or are ever meant to be construed as such. Nearly all trolled statements are meant to be funny to some people, so it does have some social/entertainment value.

"Trolling" isn't simply "harmful statements". Intentionally insulting/libelous statements are "flaming".

-Urban Dictionary
[close]
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Comando96 on January 29, 2013, 02:04:04 am
I think that, as an advisory board, the comm reps will accomplish what is planned for them easily just by being open in discussion.

The server changes will be a bit more piecemeal than I or Refleax had planned, but overall I think that we will resume normal functions after a couple weeks.

I think you need to actually use more technical rational to express what REAL POWER these people will have... due to... certain... silly people yelling out something a-kin to "LOL this is all nonsense". Better communication. It's partly what caused this, and it a lot of the solution so here's a start...

Here are the powers Representatives would currently have:

The power to persuade - This is the President of the USA's main power. He cannot make laws, but persuades others to address which type of legislation is created. Representatives would have the power to take grievances up the chain of command, as a form of an insider, working for Vince, so that many grievances could be addressed and dealt with. Quite a good ability.
The Power the whinge - They would have been elected. Therefore if nothing is acted upon with an issue: they as the representatives of the community can explain what wasn't done, and have public grievances out in the open. This is a pressuring mechanic which would build pressure on the Developers to actually do something substantial, if the issue gathered enough public attention, through which the representatives would be a median for.

That is their powers. Little, and informal. It relies heavily upon remarkable individuals to do their job and represent the people below them fully... which won't happen as this will be a popularity contest of the most popular "communities" or Regiment leaders with a maybe one or two others being serious, and the others, getting an ego based penis extension...

Real powers added, as well as an actual basic set of requirements to be a representative (something above and beyond "I own a Regiment/Community"), and this could actually have a very good impact...

May be useful in distilling the illusion, some foolish people will inevitably conclude that these people would be powerless... whereas the individuals elected need to be intelligent enough to pull the levers of power, as required. This is the main fear I have with this... if its a popularity contest then it will be luck if we have the individuals with the ability to do this in "office". I have faith in Democracy as a system, however I believe firmly that when Democracy fails, a lot of the time it is because the people, have failed in their responsibilities to make Democracy work, ie MAKE an INFORMED decision. People don't take part, and they are ignorant...
But I digress... I hope I've gotten my point over.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Carolus. on January 29, 2013, 03:05:33 am
The community isn't a single entity. I don't think the representative system will work whatsoever, and I have many people who share my view. There are probably people who think it will work, and good for the, but I disagree. This isn't a matter of predicting the future. You always bring that up in arguments, and it really has nothing to do with what I'm saying. I'm not saying I know for sure that the resolutions they would have proposed before this incident would have been unsatisfactory, but they had no reason to believe that anyone would openly oppose them, and anyone who would oppose them could be silenced easily (See: Daniel, Craig, etc.).

Edit - I screwed that quote up good lol

I agree, FSE really have proved to share the diplomacy skill of this: [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cg_8knBHEyw[/youtube]

it's funny 'cuz its true.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Harry on January 29, 2013, 05:24:03 pm
Why am I starting to dislike you? Is it the blinded replies of "LOOK AT ME FSE, GIEF ME POWAH, I BE UR SUPORTA". I just can't put my finger on where these assumptions are coming from. I mean, I did read your previous posts and they always seem to be so 'pro-fse', almost as if you are their newly hired salesman.

Vince really ought to be buying you laxatives, I mean it must be hard to continuously lay brown brick after brown brick.
The only thing that matters to me in this instant is that your responses mean nothing to me, and to countless others who are supporters of this community, because you have no respect for it.

Perhaps he shouldn't give respect to those who don't deserve it?
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Craig on January 29, 2013, 06:13:35 pm
Why am I starting to dislike you? Is it the blinded replies of "LOOK AT ME FSE, GIEF ME POWAH, I BE UR SUPORTA". I just can't put my finger on where these assumptions are coming from. I mean, I did read your previous posts and they always seem to be so 'pro-fse', almost as if you are their newly hired salesman.

Vince really ought to be buying you laxatives, I mean it must be hard to continuously lay brown brick after brown brick.


Maybe I am sucking up to the administration.

I have risen in status, and somehow survive to wish to rise higher,
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: MaHuD on January 29, 2013, 06:46:23 pm
Or he is speaking his mind like you are.
Or do you believe that only you are capable of expressing your own opinion?  ::)
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Craig on January 29, 2013, 07:01:46 pm
Or he's just mentioned that he's sucking up to the developers in order for his position to be heightened, I can only imagine you'd do the same if you weren't already a moderator on the taleworlds side of things, I can understand why you are sticking up for the administrators though, they rose you up to this position by moving to the FSE forum.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: MaHuD on January 29, 2013, 07:25:37 pm
Sure thing.  8)
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Beep_Beep_im_a_Jeep on January 29, 2013, 07:26:01 pm
Am I the only one who doesn't care about the Damn regiments, I care more about the admins and think we should Help FSE to create a new way of Choosing admins, My idea is that they should Open a thread to the community asking their opinion on the person Applying and they would then decide Yes or no, Also I think we should Call a vote on the current admins and see the Community's opinion on whether or not they should Keep their Administrative Powers. Finally there should be a Place on the Forums where people Can complain about specific admins if they feel they have been Mistreated.
All very good points!
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: 17th_Bern on January 29, 2013, 07:29:04 pm
Am I the only one who doesn't care about the Damn regiments, I care more about the admins and think we should Help FSE to create a new way of Choosing admins, My idea is that they should Open a thread to the community asking their opinion on the person Applying and they would then decide Yes or no, Also I think we should Call a vote on the current admins and see the Community's opinion on whether or not they should Keep their Administrative Powers. Finally there should be a Place on the Forums where people Can complain about specific admins if they feel they have been Mistreated.
All very good points!

:O OMG ITS BEEP BEEP IMA JEEP!!! :D good to see you about :P need to go onto EU1 again sometime ... lol
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Spearing on January 29, 2013, 07:53:02 pm

To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".

I know that this post is a few pages back, but I'd just like to say how offended I am. So just because I'm on the other side of the pond, I can make generalizations and say that because I play games only with Euro's I know, then I can be basically racist and claim the rest of the EU guys are trolls and nitwits who are so conceited that they're drunk with imaginary power.


You're an asshat.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Odysseus on January 29, 2013, 08:49:18 pm
Did you read the rest of his posts Spearing?
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Spearing on January 29, 2013, 08:52:32 pm
Honestly, no, I just skimmed through the past pages and from there on most of it was regurgitated. Did he repent? If so I'll take it back.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 29, 2013, 08:53:13 pm

To be fair... The NA portion has never really been part of the community. It's (for the most part, sorry for the decent guys im about to insult, you know who you are) a rag tag collection, a motley band of trolls and people who act aloof and as if they are on another level. Ranging from your casual racist to the suipoer serious double line guys who flame and consider everyone who doesn't like to play in their stange style beneath them.

And no, i play alot of games with Americans, i like them. This is just the NW "damed community".

I know that this post is a few pages back, but I'd just like to say how offended I am. So just because I'm on the other side of the pond, I can make generalizations and say that because I play games only with Euro's I know, then I can be basically racist and claim the rest of the EU guys are trolls and nitwits who are so conceited that they're drunk with imaginary power.


You're an asshat.

Blah Blah Blah, QQ, QQ QQ, so offended blah blah.

So, not only did you not read the post, you didn't read the subsequent apology, or the NA based players who felt what i said had some merrit. Yeah, i'm such a racist.

You're a double asshat.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 29, 2013, 08:53:45 pm
And if you read my apology i will take that back :)
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Nipplestockings on January 29, 2013, 08:55:59 pm
And if you read my apology i will take that back :)
Jesus you're <snip>. Just stop with your shit.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 29, 2013, 09:02:29 pm
And if you read my apology i will take that back :)
Jesus you're <snip>. Just stop with your shit.

Lol..... Why, someone didn't actually read what i said and flipped out about some implied insult <snip> . Well done.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Refleax on January 29, 2013, 09:05:26 pm
And if you read my apology i will take that back :)
Jesus you're fucking retarded. Just stop with your shit.

Lol..... Why, someone didn't actually read what i said and flipped out about some implied insult. <snip> Well done.

And if you read my apology i will take that back :)
Jesus you're <snip>. Just stop with your shit.

Please take private disputes to PM’s and don’t let this continue any further.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Nipplestockings on January 29, 2013, 09:09:55 pm
And if you read my apology i will take that back :)
Jesus you're <snip>. Just stop with your shit.

Lol..... Why, someone didn't actually read what i said and flipped out about some implied insult <snip> . Well done.
Lol, I read exactly what you said actually. Nice job jumping to conclusions though - you seem to be good at it.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Spearing on January 29, 2013, 09:10:09 pm
As promised, I take it all back. Glad to see you had sense in the end of it :)
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 29, 2013, 09:13:19 pm
<snip>
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 29, 2013, 09:15:37 pm
Well, it seems that things are starting to come back to normality. I am grateful for all those in the community who have worked to keep peace on these forums. :)
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Refleax on January 29, 2013, 09:15:55 pm
<snip>

Once again, please take it to PMs before I'm forced to take further action.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 29, 2013, 09:17:44 pm
Spoiler
And if you read my apology i will take that back :)
Jesus you're <snip>. Just stop with your shit.

Lol..... Why, someone didn't actually read what i said and flipped out about some implied insult <snip> . Well done.
<snip>
Lol, I read exactly what you said actually. Nice job jumping to conclusions though - you seem to be good at it.
[close]
You two obviously don't know what it means when a moderator tells you to take your dispute into PMs.

I suggest you learn quickly.

I dont even know what this 'dispute' is :D I was dealing with someone else which has now been resolved perfectly amicably in my opinion. If he wants to PM me then i am open to communication.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: McEwan on January 29, 2013, 09:22:40 pm
Your "dispute" with Spearing is not what we're talking about, I hope you recognize that.

EDIT: I edited that post for a reason, Lister.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Bashy on January 29, 2013, 09:23:04 pm
You two obviously don't know what it means when a moderator tells you to take your dispute into PMs.

I suggest you learn quickly.

I didn't know you were a forum moderator.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Vorlen on January 29, 2013, 09:25:35 pm
Your "dispute" with Spearing is not what we're talking about, I hope you recognize that.

...

?

...

I said i don't know what this dispute with Nipplestockings is, as it came out of a 4 post situation with me and spearing, as far as i'm concerned thats resolved with no hard feelings. I don't have a 'dispute' merely responed to some personal attacks by Nipple. If he wants to PM me we can insult eachother for however long he feels like. I hope you recognize that.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on January 29, 2013, 10:08:32 pm
Or he is speaking his mind like you are.
Or do you believe that only you are capable of expressing your own opinion?  ::)

Unfortunately, no, we're not saying that. What is being said is the sheer utter disbelief on how someone can be so pro-fse, it just isn't logic. He isn't just pro-FSE, he would build a shrine in his back garden and it truly would last for a thousand years.

Also, your opinion is that we are not respecting his opinion but our opinion is that his opinion is about as logical as a chocolate fireplace whilst your opinion is about how our opinion is not up to your standards of etiquette. ???
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on January 29, 2013, 10:12:26 pm
You two obviously don't know what it means when a moderator tells you to take your dispute into PMs.

I suggest you learn quickly.

I didn't know you were a forum moderator.

He had to do some acts that he isn't proud of, but ultimately that is where he will be. On all four sucking raw C whilst getting doused in white admin juice.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Affjoris on January 29, 2013, 10:18:56 pm
Or he is speaking his mind like you are.
Or do you believe that only you are capable of expressing your own opinion?  ::)

Unfortunately, no, we're not saying that. What is being said is the sheer utter disbelief on how someone can be so pro-fse, it just isn't logic. He isn't just pro-FSE, he would build a shrine in his back garden and it truly would last for a thousand years.


Even if this is true, it shouldnt be a problem. I personally am not full pro-fse but i am not full anti-fse either. If he has another opinion then you have, you should let him be. He isnt a supporting communists,  the kkk or facism. He is merely a guy who happends to  play the same game as you and who happends to not share your opinion. If he wants to be a shire, why would it bother you? Do what you do with most people you dont like, ignore and carry on.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on January 29, 2013, 10:23:20 pm
Or he is speaking his mind like you are.
Or do you believe that only you are capable of expressing your own opinion?  ::)

Unfortunately, no, we're not saying that. What is being said is the sheer utter disbelief on how someone can be so pro-fse, it just isn't logic. He isn't just pro-FSE, he would build a shrine in his back garden and it truly would last for a thousand years.


Even if this is true, it shouldnt be a problem. I personally am not full pro-fse but i am not full anti-fse either. If he has another opinion then you have, you should let him be. He isnt a supporting communists,  the kkk or facism. He is merely a guy who happends to  play the same game as you and who happends to not share your opinion. If he wants to be a shire, why would it bother you? Do what you do with most people you dont like, ignore and carry on.

He may as well be supporting communism, for that is what their locking policy could be likened to.

Also, to answer your question it doesn't bother me if he wants to have a nose dark like the night.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Affjoris on January 29, 2013, 10:26:16 pm
Or he is speaking his mind like you are.
Or do you believe that only you are capable of expressing your own opinion?  ::)

Unfortunately, no, we're not saying that. What is being said is the sheer utter disbelief on how someone can be so pro-fse, it just isn't logic. He isn't just pro-FSE, he would build a shrine in his back garden and it truly would last for a thousand years.


Even if this is true, it shouldnt be a problem. I personally am not full pro-fse but i am not full anti-fse either. If he has another opinion then you have, you should let him be. He isnt a supporting communists,  the kkk or facism. He is merely a guy who happends to  play the same game as you and who happends to not share your opinion. If he wants to be a shire, why would it bother you? Do what you do with most people you dont like, ignore and carry on.

He may as well be supporting communism, for that is what their locking policy could be likened to.

Also, to answer your question it doesn't bother me if he wants to have a nose dark like the night.

So let me get this straight. By locking all these treads. ( something that hasnt happend since the so called "revolution" ) , we get a system where everybody is equel and everyone gets an equel part of resources? Where can i sign up?

Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Craig on January 29, 2013, 10:40:11 pm
It bothers me and i find it amusing that he essentially posted that he is sucking up the admins for the purpose of climbing the community hierarchy. What bothers me is that people do this because they think it will work, which it probably will. That's my concern voiced.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: MaHuD on January 29, 2013, 10:41:51 pm
It hardly matters what he responds, you won't change your opinion anyway. You already agreed upon that earlier today.
In addition, you are only making yourself look incredibly jealous for absolutely no reason.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Craig on January 29, 2013, 10:45:09 pm
Wow jealous? That's a very inaccurate interpretation hahaha. I'm not saying my opinion wont be changed, I'm open to things, but I know where i stand on this based on my own experience. And to think that I'm jealous of someone being a brown noser of the admins, why would I be jealous when I could do exactly the same? But I don't because it's silly.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: MaHuD on January 29, 2013, 10:47:10 pm
" for absolutely no reason. "
In other words, I don't think that you are jealous, but you could be seen as one by a random person.

In any case, what do you want? You post a lot, but it's hard to see what you want to achieve. I also asked Hekko this before he left, but he didnt respond.
I suppose that some people just want to see the world burn.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on January 29, 2013, 10:51:49 pm
Or he is speaking his mind like you are.
Or do you believe that only you are capable of expressing your own opinion?  ::)

Unfortunately, no, we're not saying that. What is being said is the sheer utter disbelief on how someone can be so pro-fse, it just isn't logic. He isn't just pro-FSE, he would build a shrine in his back garden and it truly would last for a thousand years.


Even if this is true, it shouldnt be a problem. I personally am not full pro-fse but i am not full anti-fse either. If he has another opinion then you have, you should let him be. He isnt a supporting communists,  the kkk or facism. He is merely a guy who happends to  play the same game as you and who happends to not share your opinion. If he wants to be a shire, why would it bother you? Do what you do with most people you dont like, ignore and carry on.

He may as well be supporting communism, for that is what their locking policy could be likened to.

Also, to answer your question it doesn't bother me if he wants to have a nose dark like the night.

So let me get this straight. By locking all these treads. ( something that hasnt happend since the so called "revolution" ) , we get a system where everybody is equel and everyone gets an equel part of resources? Where can i sign up?

I was referring to the more darker side of communism, the oppression and not the equal rights (equal poverty) which gets distributed.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Affjoris on January 29, 2013, 10:53:35 pm
" for absolutely no reason. "
In other words, I don't think that you are jealous, but you could be seen as one by a random person.

In any case, what do you want? You post a lot, but it's hard to see what you want to achieve. I also asked Hekko this before he left, but he didnt respond.
I suppose that some people just want to see the world burn.

He actually did say what he wanted, i posted it on hekko's tread. This being said i think Craig is hammering to hard on what i see as a missunderstanding of the post of McEwan. Altough i did not see the original, i read trough his edited version and found nothing of what you claim to be in it. I think that if he really wanted to suck up he would have just left it there, and wouldnt have bothered to change it.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Craig on January 29, 2013, 10:57:13 pm
I'm not sure what you mean? I don't see how that can be viewed as jealous, but anyway
Spoiler
I'm not.
[close]

I have no intention of "watching the world burn." I asked Joris to post this on Hekko's thread on the night he created it, which he did.

The problem is that our criticisms are valid, but we need to state what we want changed. I was community banned for speaking up against the admins
along with daniel and biggun. I don't think that all the FSE team do an incompotent job, for instance I think Hancock does a great job with the bans and unbans
and acts in a professional manner about such things. Here are a few things that I and I hope most of the community want.

- Re-evaluate your management of the community, and how people are watched/moderated/banned.
- Re-consider people who were given admin who may not be up to the task.
- Stop your blatant favourtisim and biased, to uphold the professionalism of FSE as a company.
- Start treating your community like people you want to keep for the sake of your new game
- Give up on your idea of trying to keep the 51st name, honestly it's offensive to other regiments who have contributed just as much.
- Give community managers to completely Neutral memebrs of the community, who wont have as little bias as possible.
- The developers apologise for how they have been running the community recently, and myself, Daniel, Biggun, Cherry and others are unbanned.

Some of them have been done, some of them haven't. It was something i wrote quickly in an attempt to have something to aim for instead of people just jumping on the "revolution" bandwagon. Things could be added or changed to it. But even if I didn't have any solutions as of yet, It's easier to defend the status quo than to criticize it, regardless of providing a solution, the first step is acknowledging  the problem. But why am I even bothering trying to justify myself to you, when as I have previously said you did so well out of the FSE's decision to move from taleworlds, you're now a moderator so they raised you to a significant position even in-directly if they didn't choose you to do it. Hekko had plenty of ideas.

/Enddebate before this gets locked by Heathens.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on January 29, 2013, 10:59:03 pm
Some people just want to see the world burn.

Hahaha, I don't think Hekko wanted to see the world 'burn' as it would have taken him some time to write his post on the forums. Also, I think some people just like to post their opinions and have them contested and challenged by others. I must admit that I am growing quite attached to posting my opinions and watching people swarm the concept of them, it's almost like placing a lollypop near an ant hill and watching it be savaged by numbers of insignificant ants who do not think, they just 'do'.

An example of this would be the Hekko post, although he must have really cared about the community to make such a post.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: MaHuD on January 29, 2013, 11:12:50 pm
Thank you for taking your time to create a clear and compact post. :)
I will reply to your post based on information that I know or assume or trust.

I'm not sure what you mean? I don't see how that can be viewed as jealous, but anyway
Spoiler
I'm not.
[close]

I have no intention of "watching the world burn." I asked Joris to post this on Hekko's thread on the night he created it, which he did.

The problem is that our criticisms are valid, but we need to state what we want changed. I was community banned for speaking up against the admins
along with daniel and biggun. I don't think that all the FSE team do an incompotent job, for instance I think Hancock does a great job with the bans and unbans
and acts in a professional manner about such things. Here are a few things that I and I hope most of the community want.

- Re-evaluate your management of the community, and how people are watched/moderated/banned.  (From what I have seen and heard, this is being done as we speak)
- Re-consider people who were given admin who may not be up to the task. (I have requested this in the admin board, and I think they may actually do it, but not right now)
- Stop your blatant favourtisim and biased, to uphold the professionalism of FSE as a company. (FSE team is take a huge step backwards, which should greatly help this)
- Start treating your community like people you want to keep for the sake of your new game (If they wanted to keep everyone, they wouldn't have community banned people, instead they would have rolled over and surrendered to any demands made by the community)
- Give up on your idea of trying to keep the 51st name, honestly it's offensive to other regiments who have contributed just as much. (I do not believe it was their intention, I do not believe this because of things I saw on IRC. The public channel of IRC btw)

- Give community managers to completely Neutral memebrs of the community, who wont have as little bias as possible. (I hardly think that a manager role should be fullfilled by anyone else but the ones appointed by FSE.)
- The developers apologise for how they have been running the community recently, and myself, Daniel, Biggun, Cherry and others are unbanned. (They did apologise, but they seem to disagree with Biggun and Daniel atleast. Though they may reconsider as I have seen Daniel make some good posts lately)

Some of them have been done, some of them haven't. It was something i wrote quickly in an attempt to have something to aim for instead of people just jumping on the "revolution" bandwagon. Things could be added or changed to it. But even if I didn't have any solutions as of yet, It's easier to defend the status quo than to criticize it, regardless of providing a solution, the first step is acknowledging  the problem. But why am I even bothering trying to justify myself to you, when as I have previously said you did so well out of the FSE's decision to move from taleworlds, you're now a moderator so they raised you to a significant position even in-directly if they didn't choose you to do it. Hekko had plenty of ideas.

(I moderate the TW NW boards because I like to help people. As you can see with my countless of posts at the support section. I don't moderate it because it "advances" me in anyway. Which it actually does not at all, if anything my "status" decreased by becoming a mod for the NW board. The rest of the TW forumites hold no love for NW and their people and yes some also choose to show their hatred or dislike towards me.

/Enddebate before this gets locked by Heathens.





@Robin,

Forgive me, but you have lost your crediability after what you tried to pull. But don't worry, I won't disclose anything from that without your permission. Afterall it was a private conversation.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Affjoris on January 29, 2013, 11:19:46 pm
And that MaHud , was our hour long conversation in a nutshell :p
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Maia on January 29, 2013, 11:23:49 pm
#yolo

vive la revolution and shit lets fuck shit up and make rules because you only live once and so does this community

And I was all like DEMOCRACY
'Merica.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Wodan All Father on January 30, 2013, 01:47:38 pm
Spoiler
Or he is speaking his mind like you are.
Or do you believe that only you are capable of expressing your own opinion?  ::)

Unfortunately, no, we're not saying that. What is being said is the sheer utter disbelief on how someone can be so pro-fse, it just isn't logic. He isn't just pro-FSE, he would build a shrine in his back garden and it truly would last for a thousand years.


Even if this is true, it shouldnt be a problem. I personally am not full pro-fse but i am not full anti-fse either. If he has another opinion then you have, you should let him be. He isnt a supporting communists,  the kkk or facism. He is merely a guy who happends to  play the same game as you and who happends to not share your opinion. If he wants to be a shire, why would it bother you? Do what you do with most people you dont like, ignore and carry on.

He may as well be supporting communism, for that is what their locking policy could be likened to.

Also, to answer your question it doesn't bother me if he wants to have a nose dark like the night.

So let me get this straight. By locking all these treads. ( something that hasnt happend since the so called "revolution" ) , we get a system where everybody is equel and everyone gets an equel part of resources? Where can i sign up?

I was referring to the more darker side of communism, the oppression and not the equal rights (equal poverty) which gets distributed.
[close]

Better Dead than Red!  :P hehe

"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried."
    Sir Winston Churchill
    British politician (1874 - 1965)

"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
    Sir Winston Churchill
    "Demobilisation", speech in the House of Commons (22/10/1945)

Sorry to go off topic but I thought I would imbue some British Army Wodan Wisdom rant on here as it seemed to fit well xD
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Affjoris on January 30, 2013, 05:00:23 pm
Spoiler
Or he is speaking his mind like you are.
Or do you believe that only you are capable of expressing your own opinion?  ::)

Unfortunately, no, we're not saying that. What is being said is the sheer utter disbelief on how someone can be so pro-fse, it just isn't logic. He isn't just pro-FSE, he would build a shrine in his back garden and it truly would last for a thousand years.


Even if this is true, it shouldnt be a problem. I personally am not full pro-fse but i am not full anti-fse either. If he has another opinion then you have, you should let him be. He isnt a supporting communists,  the kkk or facism. He is merely a guy who happends to  play the same game as you and who happends to not share your opinion. If he wants to be a shire, why would it bother you? Do what you do with most people you dont like, ignore and carry on.

He may as well be supporting communism, for that is what their locking policy could be likened to.

Also, to answer your question it doesn't bother me if he wants to have a nose dark like the night.

So let me get this straight. By locking all these treads. ( something that hasnt happend since the so called "revolution" ) , we get a system where everybody is equel and everyone gets an equel part of resources? Where can i sign up?

I was referring to the more darker side of communism, the oppression and not the equal rights (equal poverty) which gets distributed.
[close]

Better Dead than Red!  :P hehe

"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried."
    Sir Winston Churchill
    British politician (1874 - 1965)

"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
    Winston Churchill
    "Demobilisation", speech in the House of Commons (22/10/1945)

Sorry to go off topic but I thought I would imbue some British Army Wodan Wisdom rant on here as it seemed to fit well xD

... You do realise both of these are quotes from Churchill, altough you forgot the sir with the second quote. Anyway care on with this discussioin.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Wodan All Father on January 30, 2013, 07:06:45 pm
Spoiler
Spoiler
Or he is speaking his mind like you are.
Or do you believe that only you are capable of expressing your own opinion?  ::)

Unfortunately, no, we're not saying that. What is being said is the sheer utter disbelief on how someone can be so pro-fse, it just isn't logic. He isn't just pro-FSE, he would build a shrine in his back garden and it truly would last for a thousand years.


Even if this is true, it shouldnt be a problem. I personally am not full pro-fse but i am not full anti-fse either. If he has another opinion then you have, you should let him be. He isnt a supporting communists,  the kkk or facism. He is merely a guy who happends to  play the same game as you and who happends to not share your opinion. If he wants to be a shire, why would it bother you? Do what you do with most people you dont like, ignore and carry on.

He may as well be supporting communism, for that is what their locking policy could be likened to.

Also, to answer your question it doesn't bother me if he wants to have a nose dark like the night.

So let me get this straight. By locking all these treads. ( something that hasnt happend since the so called "revolution" ) , we get a system where everybody is equel and everyone gets an equel part of resources? Where can i sign up?

I was referring to the more darker side of communism, the oppression and not the equal rights (equal poverty) which gets distributed.
[close]

Better Dead than Red!  :P hehe

"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried."
    Sir Winston Churchill
    British politician (1874 - 1965)

"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
    Winston Churchill
    "Demobilisation", speech in the House of Commons (22/10/1945)

Sorry to go off topic but I thought I would imbue some British Army Wodan Wisdom rant on here as it seemed to fit well xD

... You do realise both of these are quotes from Churchill, altough you forgot the sir with the second quote. Anyway care on with this discussioin.
[close]

Good Point Sir I will rectify that now hehe. But yeah if this does contribute to the discussion, my point is that as Robin_Hood pointed out (his reply #131 on: January 29, 2013, 10:23:20 pm this thread) we have no actual say to on anything about what FSE does other than leaving these forums. But we should at least try to make the community reps work as its a chance of getting at least some minor reforms through even if they are none that actually matter hehe. I see Robin's been muted and all now...what a surprise  :P
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Affjoris on January 30, 2013, 07:13:14 pm

Good Point Sir I will rectify that now hehe. But yeah if this does contribute to the discussion, my point is that as Robin_Hood pointed out (his reply #131 on: January 29, 2013, 10:23:20 pm this thread) we have no actual say to on anything about what FSE does other than leaving these forums. But we should at least try to make the community reps work as its a chance of getting at least some minor reforms through even if they are none that actually matter hehe. I see Robin's been muted and all now...what a surprise  :P

Robins mute was totally fair, i am ok with both sides giving there opinions and say what they want to say, but they have to do so in a civilised manner. If anybody fails to do so, and Robin failed to do so, he should be punished, doesn't matter which opinion they have.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Craig on January 30, 2013, 07:21:30 pm
If nothing changes this community will lose people (including myself) and yet more possible donators will leave the community, not looking good on the 9% donations is it.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Millander on January 30, 2013, 11:46:20 pm
do to honest I don't think many people will quit the community because of the drama or atleast not enough to make a difference one way or the other. When the first trailers come out and the beta nears release everybody and their mother will donate to get into it.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Comando96 on January 31, 2013, 12:36:39 am
Those with a foolish notion of principle and honor may leave, but everyone else with is practicle will stay...
FSE merely are handling this terribly and as far as I can see needlessly... leaks, apologies which look like whines at their oh so terrible staff core who failed to take the information to them through the propper channels... so it could presumably be ignore xD Its laughable at the handling of this... neptosism and lack... care when handing out admin caused the problem and response... meh, poor us.

Its not about what you want people to do... its what people view you as doing and their opinion of that.
PR has been dreadful ¬.¬ No matter how well intended the actions could have been or have been, the handling of the perception is... "this is why we can't have nice things", is what all the dev team should be saying to yourselves righ now!
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Carolus. on January 31, 2013, 03:55:00 am
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.

And The FSE people should concentrate on making good games instead of giving admin positions to their friends. Thats where it went down the drain. Thats should be the job of the head admin.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Craig on January 31, 2013, 11:10:33 am
do to honest I don't think many people will quit the community because of the drama or atleast not enough to make a difference one way or the other. When the first trailers come out and the beta nears release everybody and their mother will donate to get into it.

And please explain to me how donating when the beta is already nearly out will benefit the game? If you donate after all the core features are done in the game then what is your money going towards? marketing I suppose. Still regardless I'd expect that a company should get a flood of donations at the start (more than 9%) with which the company should build the core aspects of the game, with 9% of the donations they aren't going to be able to add as much as they'd like to are they. Maybe they will have to call off the game due to lack of donations, in which case Diplex if you're reading this, I'd get some jewish lawyers involved to get your money back.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: MaHuD on January 31, 2013, 11:28:33 am
The beta is nearly out?
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: James Grant on January 31, 2013, 11:39:32 am
do to honest I don't think many people will quit the community because of the drama or atleast not enough to make a difference one way or the other. When the first trailers come out and the beta nears release everybody and their mother will donate to get into it.

And please explain to me how donating when the beta is already nearly out will benefit the game? If you donate after all the core features are done in the game then what is your money going towards? marketing I suppose. Still regardless I'd expect that a company should get a flood of donations at the start (more than 9%) with which the company should build the core aspects of the game, with 9% of the donations they aren't going to be able to add as much as they'd like to are they. Maybe they will have to call off the game due to lack of donations, in which case Diplex if you're reading this, I'd get some jewish lawyers involved to get your money back.

Honestly I just am not donating because the game period doesn't interest me in the slightest. The American Civil war has been done so many times and I'm sure this will be one of the better ACW games but that doesn't change the matter that it isn't anything I'm particularly hyped for. Though I'm very interested in terms of mod potential.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Craig on January 31, 2013, 12:19:20 pm
The beta is nearly out?

do to honest I don't think many people will quit the community because of the drama or atleast not enough to make a difference one way or the other. When the first trailers come out and the beta nears release everybody and their mother will donate to get into it.

Reading makes everyone's life easier.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Rejenorst on January 31, 2013, 01:36:59 pm
do to honest I don't think many people will quit the community because of the drama or atleast not enough to make a difference one way or the other. When the first trailers come out and the beta nears release everybody and their mother will donate to get into it.

And please explain to me how donating when the beta is already nearly out will benefit the game? If you donate after all the core features are done in the game then what is your money going towards? marketing I suppose. Still regardless I'd expect that a company should get a flood of donations at the start (more than 9%) with which the company should build the core aspects of the game, with 9% of the donations they aren't going to be able to add as much as they'd like to are they. Maybe they will have to call off the game due to lack of donations, in which case Diplex if you're reading this, I'd get some jewish lawyers involved to get your money back.

Afaik no marketing has been done yet period. There hasn't been a need at this stage.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Craig on January 31, 2013, 01:57:29 pm
I'm  referring to his point about everyone donating when beta is available.  Which will be after all the core features (what will make or break the game) will probably be done.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Kator Viridian on January 31, 2013, 02:32:12 pm
I'm  referring to his point about everyone donating when beta is available.  Which will be after all the core features (what will make or break the game) will probably be done.

Craig you might want to also note how much CRPG raised in a day ... compared to FSE over a 3 month period. The game itself will not raise much in donations until sales of closed beta (Pay to enter beta) and sales of final product start to come on. I doubt 10k euros would be raised by products end at the moment ... which if taking a year is less wages than an admin assistant would earn.

Money will only be started to of been made at products end and release, I would say the donation money is currently going towards software licenses than anything else.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: PrideofNi on January 31, 2013, 02:44:52 pm
In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.

And The FSE people should concentrate on making good games instead of giving admin positions to their friends. Thats where it went down the drain. Thats should be the job of the head admin.

Ironic, but please continue the raving :)
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: MaHuD on January 31, 2013, 03:21:34 pm


In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.

And The FSE people should concentrate on making good games instead of giving admin positions to their friends. Thats where it went down the drain. Thats should be the job of the head admin.



Ironic, but please continue the raving :)



The head admin should give admin positions to his friends?
The beta is nearly out?

do to honest I don't think many people will quit the community because of the drama or atleast not enough to make a difference one way or the other. When the first trailers come out and the beta nears release everybody and their mother will donate to get into it.

Reading makes everyone's life easier.
Ah, was wishful thinking on my side that made me read it wrong. :-[
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Modig on February 01, 2013, 12:56:01 am
If we, the NW community, are going to have any structure and relation left, this EU vs NA stuff needs to stop. We are one community. We come from across the world, from many backgrounds, but we all share the same interest: the Napoleonic Wars. That is why we're here. We are not here to bandy words and argue about who's better, because no one is better than anyone else. Sure, there may be those who are annoying, trollish, etc. etc. but if we become elitist and feel superior towards them, we make ourselves no better than they are. Play the game; enjoy each other's company; it really is an amazing thing that we can come together from such a distance, and that is what we should treasure and keep in our minds.

E pluribus unum.

You do forget that complaints were raised towards the NA administration, but mostly towards the EU. Still, EVERY SINGLE DAMNED NA ADMIN TAKES IT PERSONALLY, like the conflict-seeking elitist pricks you are.

The "NA vs. EU stuff" only exists because you cant realize there are problems with your administration as well.




In my opinion people need to grow up and stop arguing over stuff like this.

It doesn't help when people go around making things worse by feeding the trolls.
And FSE need to get some proper admins who aren't complete and utter trolls.

And The FSE people should concentrate on making good games instead of giving admin positions to their friends. Thats where it went down the drain. Thats should be the job of the head admin.



Ironic, but please continue the raving :)



The head admin should give admin positions to his friends?
The beta is nearly out?

do to honest I don't think many people will quit the community because of the drama or atleast not enough to make a difference one way or the other. When the first trailers come out and the beta nears release everybody and their mother will donate to get into it.

Reading makes everyone's life easier.
Ah, was wishful thinking on my side that made me read it wrong. :-[

No, the headadmin wasn't giving admin to his friends. The headadmin had a list of candidates, and then the headadmin had a list of potentially good admins.

CarolusRex was a good candidate for admin. It is pretty absurd to accuse Hancky of any kind of unjust ruling, the man has more morals than anyone in this community and doesnt bend an inch from them.

CarolusRex was a potential admin-candidate which we encouraged to seek admin through the proper channels, and so he did, only to meet resistance from Vince who has NOTHING TO DO with the admin process.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: MaHuD on February 01, 2013, 01:08:28 am
Eh?
Where did I say he did?

You do realise that by making that assumption, it is only more likley that it is actually true?
Got that from playing werewolf.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Modig on February 01, 2013, 01:10:24 am
Eh?
Where did I say he did?

You do realise that by making that assumption, it is only more likley that it is actually true?
Got that from playing werewolf.

"The head admin should give admin positions to his friends?" Isnt that of your typing? Or do I read the quotation-tree wrongly?
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: MaHuD on February 01, 2013, 01:13:01 am
There is a question mark, I was questioning what the guy suggested.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Modig on February 01, 2013, 01:30:59 am
There is a question mark, I was questioning what the guy suggested.

And hear I thought you were ironic and all. Internet - Modig. 1 - 0
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Rejenorst on February 01, 2013, 08:35:06 am
Most people gravitate around their friends so in essence everyone wants someone whom they are at least on friendly terms with.

Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Rebel on February 03, 2013, 05:22:15 am
trolls ruin everything and their not even that funny
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Robin_Hood on February 03, 2013, 02:08:42 pm
trolls ruin everything and their not even that funny

I imagine your a fun guy to be around.
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: Winchansa on February 03, 2013, 11:13:41 pm
So you Tell me ppl betwen 12-16 forum whores going to chose what to do with this gr8 game FSE you just fucked up
 :o
Title: Re: A response to recently expressed grievances
Post by: PrideofNi on February 03, 2013, 11:18:56 pm
So you Tell me ppl betwen 12-16 forum whores going to chose what to do with this gr8 game FSE you just fucked up
 :o

This is a rather strange post on so many levels.