ChimpZ VS USA (NA Server)
ChimpZ VS USA (EU Server)
watch someone say now how all of them weren't top NA players or they were trolling.
still were NA incase any autismo brings that up.
The fact is they weren't top NA players
What you're doing would basically be like Canada boasting about beating Finland or Greece.... "still were EU incase any autismo brings that up!!1"
Havoc 90p Fireboy 88p NickCole 87p Puppytron(Told he was 87p) Sleek 86p Fartknocker 85p Montoya 85p Unitater(probs 82/83) vs EU's on 120+ping. These ratings are meant to cross over to EU and NA to give a accurate understanding of both communities skills. I can only presume they are relevant to EU and therefore lets relate them to players of that rating on EU (Bare in mind EU list is fucked). Troister 90p Janne 88p Dayboul 87p Dren 87p LeBrave 86p Irish 85p Gi 85p Cazasar 83p <<< Now you claim the people that played for NA are equivalent to the skill level of Greece and Finland on EU yet when u compare the ratings of the players on NA to the EU equivalent then it really does paint a different picture of the skill the NA team had, which is of a pretty high level although u did not bring your BEST lineup. Eitherway dont make excuse that a above average yet not the best NA team lost to a EU team compromised of a similar EU skill levelled team on 120+ping beat u on a NA server. #UTV #SOTC p.s. Im not sitting exams for my grammar anymore so dont be the grammar police and lock me up for bad grammar in the noun prison. k thxs bai xoxoxo
No part of your argument made sense. Using the ratings to back up your argument is autism because 1) The ratings/ratings, in general, are highly subjective and a person who's an 85 could just as easily be a 75 depending on who's making the list. 2) Few people in NA agrees with the accuracy of the list and 3) You even just said the EU list isn't accurate. So if both lists are inaccurate....why bother trying to do an equivalency test? Your comparisons are completely unreliable based on the arbitrary nature of ratings, and the rest of your argument is based on that.
I say it is not accurate because one person sometimes has a overiding opinion compared to others but for the most part our list is general in order of skill apart from a few people who are too low and a few too high that is all. Never going to get a perfect list just like the NA one. Few people in NA agree with the list? Credit goes to: Havoc (for compiling the list) and Yoshie, NickCole, Maniac, Godfreid, Rafael, RussianFury, DjOverjoy, Fartknocker, Krastinov, Suns, KnightofStJohn, Anthony, Jorge, and anyone else I'm forgetting for contributing. <<< hmmmm i think you might just be salty with your rating or something who knows....
People got credited for contributing to the list who didn't really do anything lol.
and no, I honestly don't care about my rating, I could be removed from the list altogether and it wouldn't make a difference to me. I say the list is inaccurate because it's based off a very arbitrary forumla and very subjective opinions, which makes it inaccurate.
