Wait to everyone heres from frank...lol
Matt you are a piece of shit person for real lol and its not even just the cheats.
Read matts first post on TKC forums...says it all
https://i.gyazo.com/e51fd79ff7b5f9348515e43c2b4cf007.png
I am such a great troll. That was such a great idea, creating a profile with the same name as I have on fse on a known cheater website asking for cheats. It got so much attention, and still is, you are still triggered by it.
Sadly, I stopped being a troll and actually started to care about NW afterwards.
Why do we even need to argue about this?Because we need to that essential serotonin going ese, it ain't no fucking fun without it. Lets stop questioning why and just keep FUCKING DOING IT. IT FEELS FUCKING GOOD!
Why do we even need to argue about this?Because we need to that essential serotonin going ese, it ain't no fucking fun without it. Lets stop questioning why and just keep FUCKING DOING IT. IT FEELS FUCKING GOOD!
I've played with/against MATT enough, and watched the recent tournament, and I've never seen him do anything that made me think he was remotely suspicious. He's good, but he still makes mistakes that a program wouldn't.
I watched him sideblock in an ft7 vs Dante not too long ago
I've managed to land kicks on him (and that is far from my strong suit)
He's never thrown a straight stab that messed my timing up from just it's pure speed etc etc etc
If you're going to accuse someone of hacking, at least bring the only real credible evidence, a video. Otherwise, it just looks like salt.
I genuinely could not care less what some shady dude who sells hacks says.
#IStandWithMatt
I will say that I have faced Walter 9 times in ft7s and beat him 8 out of the 9 times. During my duels with him he did die at least once to me in every ft7 due to a side block which is why I believe he doesn't auto. He did play native before coming to NW & native is a great way to improve your blocking.well that's the exact issue -- i recall teaching him how to block chamber of duels and no more than a week later he could block up-downs like anthony... was very sus, but i doubt he still uses it so it's not important
I will say that I have faced Walter 9 times in ft7s and beat him 8 out of the 9 times. During my duels with him he did die at least once to me in every ft7 due to a side block which is why I believe he doesn't auto. He did play native before coming to NW & native is a great way to improve your blocking.well that's the exact issue -- i recall teaching him how to block chamber of duels and no more than a week later he could block up-downs like anthony... was very sus, but i doubt he still uses it so it's not important
and suns....? I'm not sure what our ft7 record and personal relationship has to do with all of this, this is about MATT's cheating accusations... has nothing to do with me. hit the pm's if you really care that much about it
godfreid.
the problem with making a video as i stated before, the problem with the competitive scene on this game is the fact accusations with a video are based on perspective.
the contents in the "full package" are difficult to record and prove from a perspective other than the person being accused (my perspective)
i can take videos of matt but it would be difficult what constitutes altered hitboxes, autoblocking, speed adjustment of stabs, etc etc
that's why movement and i decided the only real way to prove the accusations are true and not based on "salt" is to get into contact with the direct source of the hacks themselves.
i don't really know what other proof we can give to you to make you believe us, a video would just be met with greater scrutiny from the community and labeled as "salt."
_________________________________________________________________________________
oatmeal.
there was not much "personal salt" from me being 7-0'd, there was a degree and always has been of "personal salt" whenever i would duel matt as he's been pulling suspicious things from my perspective for a long while.
as i said before, some days he's doing awfully bad and i'll be 7-0'ing him within 10 minutes and he cannot stun any of my holds or block any of my chambers, then he turns opposite and starts stunning anything i throw at him, or delayed hold or stab with different timings each one, or manage to block or outstun my stunchambers which no one can do consistently besides matt some of the time
i lose some i win some, i remember directly after losing i put into the chat "7-0 gg." without raging or complaining about anything, i left the server right after without saying any other words
im fine with losing, its a game and the one who plays to the best of their abilities/personal attributes will win
i just find it hypocritical you say i take losing ft7s (especially 7-0's) personally, as after i 7-0'd you last ft7 you dodged ft7ing me for a year, yet complained for a year degrading my playstyle saying i am a "turkish kicking ping abuse player" when i never turkish kicked you once when i 7-0'd you
the most recent ft7 i've had with you was in that duel tournament which was forced as we met in the same bracket
after 7-1'ing you and even during the rounds inside the ft7 of the tourny, you seemed to take it personal quite a bit, complaining and delaying, but that's just what i think
i just find it goofy you complain quite a bit but you won't do much else, you just sit and talk, you do not ft7 or duel yet claim things against me.
_________________________________________________________________________________
i remember the duel tournament based with hacks after it occurred, i don't watch or read the threads dan the chef makes as he makes many of these little tournaments which nearly occurred every month for a period of time, i do not see that as "competitive"
walter i have heard he autoblocked in the past but i am not so sure as i haven't been around him that much (only time ive been around him recently was 93rd but he didn't show up as much) as my feints have gotten through to him easily in my ft7s ive had with him
i will admit, i do not like matt, but that stems from the personality he likes to flaunt on the game i do not agree with and the things he says/believes or his actions over the years.
you can label me as a sociopath i guess, but do remember i was cool with you at one point for a very long time until you thought it was cool to roast me on my personal shit when i thought we were cool, i don't have any problems with you except you complaining about me a lot, a lot of it behind my back yet you seem cool to me sometimes when im around
haha.
people can keep on calling me biased and this incident based on personal vendetta of movement and i
but as i said before, just wait until the investigation completes
then we can see who was right all along. :-X
godfreid.
the problem with making a video as i stated before, the problem with the competitive scene on this game is the fact accusations with a video are based on perspective.
the contents in the "full package" are difficult to record and prove from a perspective other than the person being accused (my perspective)
i can take videos of matt but it would be difficult what constitutes altered hitboxes, autoblocking, speed adjustment of stabs, etc etc
that's why movement and i decided the only real way to prove the accusations are true and not based on "salt" is to get into contact with the direct source of the hacks themselves.
i don't really know what other proof we can give to you to make you believe us, a video would just be met with greater scrutiny from the community and labeled as "salt."
I've played with/against MATT enough, and watched the recent tournament, and I've never seen him do anything that made me think he was remotely suspicious. He's good, but he still makes mistakes that a program wouldn't.
I watched him sideblock in an ft7 vs Dante not too long ago
I've managed to land kicks on him (and that is far from my strong suit)
He's never thrown a straight stab that messed my timing up from just it's pure speed etc etc etc
If you're going to accuse someone of hacking, at least bring the only real credible evidence, a video. Otherwise, it just looks like salt.
I genuinely could not care less what some shady dude who sells hacks says.
haha.
people can keep on calling me biased and this incident based on personal vendetta of movement and i
but as i said before, just wait until the investigation completes
then we can see who was right all along. :-X
Didn't he already resign from the league though?
It would almost seem to me like Frank is playing both sides l m a o
It would almost seem to me like Frank is playing both sides l m a o
If Suns has actual evidence that blows this whole thing open, then I might change my mind, but we'll see I guess. Just seems weird that new evidence is coming up all of a sudden. You haven't proven it already, so it seems suspect that NOW you have something solid that proves it. Again though, I could be wrong and you could change my mind.
If it's legit then why do you need to wait to talk to people about it? Why not just post it and let the community decide? What is there to wait on?If Suns has actual evidence that blows this whole thing open, then I might change my mind, but we'll see I guess. Just seems weird that new evidence is coming up all of a sudden. You haven't proven it already, so it seems suspect that NOW you have something solid that proves it. Again though, I could be wrong and you could change my mind.
it wasn't me who brought this new evidence up.
frank was memeing quite a bit in his chats with matt.
well, the staff asked me not to speak about it until the investigation is over, their choice and they are the ones who want it kept quiet while they discuss things then contact people if they need further testimonies or what not etc, the point is to get away from the massive public eye on it im thinking.
i do see why, its quite a lot to handle, if anything movement and i should have contacted them privately at first, then released, or waited until a conclusion was reached then released things, it would have probably made things easier a bit.
well, the staff asked me not to speak about it until the investigation is over, their choice and they are the ones who want it kept quiet while they discuss things then contact people if they need further testimonies or what not etc, the point is to get away from the massive public eye on it im thinking.
i do see why, its quite a lot to handle, if anything movement and i should have contacted them privately at first, then released, or waited until a conclusion was reached then released things, it would have probably made things easier a bit.
Jolly hasnt even told suns what the "undeniable evidence" is yet. Suns is frauding hard as usual.
haha.
people can keep on calling me biased and this incident based on personal vendetta of movement and i
but as i said before, just wait until the investigation completes
then we can see who was right all along. :-X
Didn't he already resign from the league though?
yes, but the investigation is ongoing (waiting on a few people to come online/meet up with/discuss new evidence that arose today)
unreleased until the investigation completes, within a "few days" is what im hearing, "later on in the week."
_________________________________________________________________________________
a video is not sufficient, it only is sufficient if you're proving someone is using unblockable, (as you can simply detect it by blocking to the right at the right moment) it's obvious.
as i said before and you fail to recognize, there is no real way to prove autoblock, altered hitboxes, radar, altered stab speed etc, through a video, (it's not as obvious as unblockable) it's like you imply these hacks are not toggleable, and the hacker in question doesn't just need to turn them off then begin recording from their POV to prove they are innocent.
the only real thing left is just to wait until the investigation completes, it's dumb speculating and assuming until everything is sorted thoroughly.
haha, must be very easy to prove anyone of autoblocking, isn't it godfreid?
how come when Bill made the autoblocking video of MATT in 2017 no one paid attention too it, no one believed it.
i thought your theory that video footage would easily prove autoblocking?
the only time people started believing the video was after MATT admitted to using autoblock.
LOL !
theory machine broke.
claiming "they can only block the direction they're being attacked from, making it easy to spot" is illogical, as you continually forget the hacks are toggle-able, some packages (ive heard, not 100% how it works but there are variations) you need to relaunch the game or rejoin the server for it to work, others are toggle-able with the pressing of a button, the program runs in the background on your desktop while the warband program is on. (i have a general idea what the program looks like in the background)
and to find altered stab speed what are you gonna do? record the stab speed from one person then record the stab speed from another person then compare the times? the average stab speed is between 0.5>1 and 0.5<1 (1.5 at most?) seconds, if anything im sure the people who created the altered stab speed made it so it is a subtle yet significant increase, it's not going to be anything major as that would defeat using the hack, the more obvious it is the less likely people will be willing to buy it (as the chances of getting caught would be high)
how would you find the altered hitbox through a video? have one person stab at another 10 times in 1 area and then have another person stab at the other 10 times in 1 area and compare the hit percentages of both?
in theory, it seems we could be able to detect these two things, altered stab speed and altered hitboxes.
but in theory, these experiments are also rendered obsolete with the simple press of a button, toggle-able hacks. ::)
hah, i guess using my own logic against me means i could be a hacker too? who knows. :)
that's why movement and i concluded from the very beginning there is no real "accurate" ::) way to prove someone is hacking through video footage.
you need to either get the accused to admit they were hacking (haha like as if they would willingly admit prior to being accused), or go to the direct source and ask them if they are willing to spill whether the accused purchased hacks of them or not, if they did and they do spill, try and get a financial record, receipt of purchase, or any other info etc, info the staff of the 4v4 league are looking into after speaking with Frank.
if anything, your posts are based on dumb speculating and assuming the underlying motive for movement and i gathering this and presenting it to the community is because of "personal salt" we hold against matt, the investigation has concluded, nor do you know of all of the evidences brought against matt which i said before, have not been released as those handling it have not finished discussing it.
it's not like you just speculated and assumed your first post our underlying motives without even speaking to us or knowing 100% what is going on, LOL !
haha, must be very easy to prove anyone of autoblocking, isn't it godfreid?
how come when Bill made the autoblocking video of MATT in 2017 no one paid attention too it, no one believed it.
i thought your theory that video footage would easily prove autoblocking?
the only time people started believing the video was after MATT admitted to using autoblock.
LOL !
theory machine broke.
claiming "they can only block the direction they're being attacked from, making it easy to spot" is illogical, as you continually forget the hacks are toggle-able, some packages (ive heard, not 100% how it works but there are variations) you need to relaunch the game or rejoin the server for it to work, others are toggle-able with the pressing of a button, the program runs in the background on your desktop while the warband program is on. (i have a general idea what the program looks like in the background)
and to find altered stab speed what are you gonna do? record the stab speed from one person then record the stab speed from another person then compare the times? the average stab speed is between 0.5>1 and 0.5<1 (1.5 at most?) seconds, if anything im sure the people who created the altered stab speed made it so it is a subtle yet significant increase, it's not going to be anything major as that would defeat using the hack, the more obvious it is the less likely people will be willing to buy it (as the chances of getting caught would be high)
how would you find the altered hitbox through a video? have one person stab at another 10 times in 1 area and then have another person stab at the other 10 times in 1 area and compare the hit percentages of both?
in theory, it seems we could be able to detect these two things, altered stab speed and altered hitboxes.
but in theory, these experiments are also rendered obsolete with the simple press of a button, toggle-able hacks. ::)
hah, i guess using my own logic against me means i could be a hacker too? who knows. :)
that's why movement and i concluded from the very beginning there is no real "accurate" ::) way to prove someone is hacking through video footage.
you need to either get the accused to admit they were hacking (haha like as if they would willingly admit prior to being accused), or go to the direct source and ask them if they are willing to spill whether the accused purchased hacks of them or not, if they did and they do spill, try and get a financial record, receipt of purchase, or any other info etc, info the staff of the 4v4 league are looking into after speaking with Frank.
if anything, your posts are based on dumb speculating and assuming the underlying motive for movement and i gathering this and presenting it to the community is because of "personal salt" we hold against matt, the investigation has concluded, nor do you know of all of the evidences brought against matt which i said before, have not been released as those handling it have not finished discussing it.
it's not like you just speculated and assumed your first post our underlying motives without even speaking to us or knowing 100% what is going on, LOL !
record me playing. when i kill you with a stun for the millionth time in a row, analyze and see if my stab was faster, because I will have had to toggle my speed hacks on to kill you
you are so bad at this it is hilarious
also i posted of me playing plz show me where i was toggling mr genius boy all you do is keep avoiding video evidence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1zXyh7h8d8
another vid from today
now people might say but matt all you did was toggle off your cheats for the vid!!!
if i have been cheating everyday for hte past 2 and a half years i wouldnt be able to toggle off all my cheats and be able to perform well.
these are the cheats people claim i use, just to show you how rediculous this is, starting from the most rediculous accusation to the least
1. Altered hitbox, my hitbox is made smaller than everyone elses
2. Altered stab speed, my stabs are faster than everyone elses
3. kick correction, impossible for me to get kicked
4. unblockable, my stab goes through peoples blocks
5. radar, i have a radar map showing where everyone is
6. Health indicator, tells me who the health levels of players around me
7. autoblock, i dont have to move my mouse up or down to block the attack
I toggled off 7 cheats for the first time in 2 and a half years and I still top frag against the best players in the game. Ok
haha, must be very easy to prove anyone of autoblocking, isn't it godfreid?
how come when Bill made the autoblocking video of MATT in 2017 no one paid attention too it, no one believed it.
i thought your theory that video footage would easily prove autoblocking?
the only time people started believing the video was after MATT admitted to using autoblock.
LOL !
theory machine broke.
claiming "they can only block the direction they're being attacked from, making it easy to spot" is illogical, as you continually forget the hacks are toggle-able, some packages (ive heard, not 100% how it works but there are variations) you need to relaunch the game or rejoin the server for it to work, others are toggle-able with the pressing of a button, the program runs in the background on your desktop while the warband program is on. (i have a general idea what the program looks like in the background)
and to find altered stab speed what are you gonna do? record the stab speed from one person then record the stab speed from another person then compare the times? the average stab speed is between 0.5>1 and 0.5<1 (1.5 at most?) seconds, if anything im sure the people who created the altered stab speed made it so it is a subtle yet significant increase, it's not going to be anything major as that would defeat using the hack, the more obvious it is the less likely people will be willing to buy it (as the chances of getting caught would be high)
how would you find the altered hitbox through a video? have one person stab at another 10 times in 1 area and then have another person stab at the other 10 times in 1 area and compare the hit percentages of both?
in theory, it seems we could be able to detect these two things, altered stab speed and altered hitboxes.
but in theory, these experiments are also rendered obsolete with the simple press of a button, toggle-able hacks. ::)
hah, i guess using my own logic against me means i could be a hacker too? who knows. :)
that's why movement and i concluded from the very beginning there is no real "accurate" ::) way to prove someone is hacking through video footage.
you need to either get the accused to admit they were hacking (haha like as if they would willingly admit prior to being accused), or go to the direct source and ask them if they are willing to spill whether the accused purchased hacks of them or not, if they did and they do spill, try and get a financial record, receipt of purchase, or any other info etc, info the staff of the 4v4 league are looking into after speaking with Frank.
if anything, your posts are based on dumb speculating and assuming the underlying motive for movement and i gathering this and presenting it to the community is because of "personal salt" we hold against matt, the investigation has concluded, nor do you know of all of the evidences brought against matt which i said before, have not been released as those handling it have not finished discussing it.
it's not like you just speculated and assumed your first post our underlying motives without even speaking to us or knowing 100% what is going on, LOL !
if anything, your posts are based on dumb speculating and assuming the underlying motive for movement and i gathering this and presenting it to the community is because of "personal salt"
it's not like you just speculated and assumed your first post our underlying motives without even speaking to us or knowing 100% what is going on, LOL !
Otherwise, it just looks like salt.
I genuinely could not care less what some shady dude who sells hacks says.
Otherwise, it just looks like salt.
I genuinely could not care less what some shady dude who sells hacks says.
tfw you assume/speculate the underlying motives of two people accusing another of hacking by highlighting "it's just salt" in an attempt to invalidate their credibility, then claim you never did
Bill has accused many people, but this was the first time (i think) he actually made a video about it, you're generalizing all of his accusations without taking into account this separate incident was much different.
i even gave experimental scenarios for a "anti-hacking video" method, but in essence it is all rendered obsolete with the toggle-able ability these hacks contain.
at this point, you're just being stubborn and circulating my rhetoric against me and reiterating the same points after i already explained why they would be ineffective and obsolete, as these videos have surfaced in the past but they were never successful. (the only successful video was vetro using unblockable, as catching unblockable is blatant)
however, it was still met with scrutiny and disbelief as it is up to the viewer's perspective to make an opinion regardless of "accuracy," "accuracy" should not be based on perspective but rather undeniable proofs, why movement and i believed it was necessary to go to the direct source, or distributer, of said hacks, in an attempt to gather more information, incriminating information.
and no, simply stating why it's obsolete to make a video in an attempt to proving hacks is not fair grounds to assume once again why movement and i have not submitted a video as in your eyes we cannot "provide any concrete evidence."
This is the information I was given and concluded that there is no REAL in-game evidence that proves Matt hacked DURING the 4v4 league. It's too hard to tell and I nor the mod team and say for certain he was hacking in-game.
Damn they put more effort into these statements than i do into entire essaysHonestly spent more time on this than my project due tomorrow
The good guys won time to sit back, relax, and reflect on my truly inspirational NW career over a 24 oz can of natty iceisnt that a natty daddy?
The good guys won time to sit back, relax, and reflect on my truly inspirational NW career over a 24 oz can of natty iceisnt that a natty daddy?
happy to have been a part of your great career, it felt like just yesterday we were 60 ping noobs in the LG getting bossed around by theodin.
Maybe it's my time too, what an impact we've made in this game.. truly something else.
lol.
so claiming what other's think based upon the evidence they believed was credible in their minds upon submission and empirical observation amongst themselves that drove them to find said evidence, means it's a fact to highlight it as "salt."
it's like you're psychic and can automatically read our minds.
if we were salty, we would know about it within ourselves.
but throughout the entire incident our underlying motive was to find the truth, we believed we did, why we submitted what we believed was for the public to see.
but i guess that can be scrutinized very much and labeled as nothing other than "salt."
it's like as if any attempt we make is shot down regardless, utterly, this has not been the first time matt has been accused, the 4th time to be exact.
in my personal opinion, im not so sure how a video would prove a person of hacking with the "full package contents" as i have just learned all of these terms/hacks existed for warband
it's something no one has really heard of or seen before, publicly.
many just would never know how to tell, and that doubt is what would make that hypothetical video obsolete, in our minds it seemed much more incriminating to ask the direct source for info, rather than make a video being at high risk ( in our minds) of being scrutinized and taken with disbelief.
i cant speak for movement, but this is my personal opinion on all of this
im sure all of you can put together what i think about matt through all of this
_________________________________________________________________________________
ive probably typed 5+ essays out of this entire fiasco
I got ip banned from TKC...Looks like someone didn't like me snoopingRIP LOL
There has never been a person in NW who has become a competitive top player through the use of hacks. The only time I've ever seen people hack they're either randoms, trolling, or from native (lul).It's not really framing when the evidence comes from the guy who sold the hacks. In my post he gave me proof that it was "Matt" but it's difficult to say it really is Matt or someone who used the name. We don't have time stamps so we don't know when the purchase was made. Mr.Frank is also a super sketchy guy so I was doubtful of him.
Sounds like Suns + whoever in involved in framing Matt is just really salty that he's a good player (maybe a better player even?)
If Matt was more humble/didn't brag about his skill nobody would have any problems with him, the accusers are just coming from a personal level of offense.
I can't be bothered with reading any of this but it's virtually impossible to prove anyone's cheating (unless MAYBE it's with certain POV recordings) in terms of autoblock or whatever, enjoy.
lol.
so claiming what other's think based upon the evidence they believed was credible in their minds upon submission and empirical observation amongst themselves that drove them to find said evidence, means it's a fact to highlight it as "salt."
it's like you're psychic and can automatically read our minds.
if we were salty, we would know about it within ourselves.
but throughout the entire incident our underlying motive was to find the truth, we believed we did, why we submitted what we believed was for the public to see.
but i guess that can be scrutinized very much and labeled as nothing other than "salt."
it's like as if any attempt we make is shot down regardless, utterly, this has not been the first time matt has been accused, the 4th time to be exact.
in my personal opinion, im not so sure how a video would prove a person of hacking with the "full package contents" as i have just learned all of these terms/hacks existed for warband
it's something no one has really heard of or seen before, publicly.
many just would never know how to tell, and that doubt is what would make that hypothetical video obsolete, in our minds it seemed much more incriminating to ask the direct source for info, rather than make a video being at high risk ( in our minds) of being scrutinized and taken with disbelief.
i cant speak for movement, but this is my personal opinion on all of this
im sure all of you can put together what i think about matt through all of this
_________________________________________________________________________________
ive probably typed 5+ essays out of this entire fiasco
My god, I'm actually concerned for your reading comprehension and general level of intelligence.
"If you're going to accuse someone of hacking, at least bring the only real credible evidence, a video. Otherwise, it just looks like salt." <- That's the statement you're so hung up on.
This was a general statement, not directed at anyone, but applicable to everyone (if I'm being honest, if I had anyone in mind when making that statement, it was Bill). Stating that if someone (anyone) is going to accuse some else of hacking, they should provide solid evidence. Otherwise, their accusation just looks like them being salty. That's just a fact of how their accusation will be perceived. I literally already explained this in another post, which just makes this worse.
Now, instead of doing your best impression of a smart man like you did above, actually use your brain, take in what I'm saying and shut the fuck up. Have some self awareness and realize how stupid you're making yourself look.
That's enough fse for me tonight, the cringe is just too much.
If you're going to accuse someone of hacking, at least bring the only real credible evidence, a video. Otherwise, it just looks like salt.
I genuinely could not care less what some shady dude who sells hacks says.
You're going to need to bring something better than that one time a guy [Bill] who accuses people who don't hack of hacking, made a video accusing someone of hacking. There is a certain credibility element to take into account.
You and movement concluding there's no accurate way to prove someone's hacking through video footage sounds like a convenient way to dodge having to post any significant evidence. As I said before, the receipt was nonsensical garbage that doesn't prove anything.
Spoilerlol.
so claiming what other's think based upon the evidence they believed was credible in their minds upon submission and empirical observation amongst themselves that drove them to find said evidence, means it's a fact to highlight it as "salt."
it's like you're psychic and can automatically read our minds.
if we were salty, we would know about it within ourselves.
but throughout the entire incident our underlying motive was to find the truth, we believed we did, why we submitted what we believed was for the public to see.
but i guess that can be scrutinized very much and labeled as nothing other than "salt."
it's like as if any attempt we make is shot down regardless, utterly, this has not been the first time matt has been accused, the 4th time to be exact.
in my personal opinion, im not so sure how a video would prove a person of hacking with the "full package contents" as i have just learned all of these terms/hacks existed for warband
it's something no one has really heard of or seen before, publicly.
many just would never know how to tell, and that doubt is what would make that hypothetical video obsolete, in our minds it seemed much more incriminating to ask the direct source for info, rather than make a video being at high risk ( in our minds) of being scrutinized and taken with disbelief.
i cant speak for movement, but this is my personal opinion on all of this
im sure all of you can put together what i think about matt through all of this
_________________________________________________________________________________
ive probably typed 5+ essays out of this entire fiasco
My god, I'm actually concerned for your reading comprehension and general level of intelligence.
"If you're going to accuse someone of hacking, at least bring the only real credible evidence, a video. Otherwise, it just looks like salt." <- That's the statement you're so hung up on.
This was a general statement, not directed at anyone, but applicable to everyone (if I'm being honest, if I had anyone in mind when making that statement, it was Bill). Stating that if someone (anyone) is going to accuse some else of hacking, they should provide solid evidence. Otherwise, their accusation just looks like them being salty. That's just a fact of how their accusation will be perceived. I literally already explained this in another post, which just makes this worse.
Now, instead of doing your best impression of a smart man like you did above, actually use your brain, take in what I'm saying and shut the fuck up. Have some self awareness and realize how stupid you're making yourself look.
That's enough fse for me tonight, the cringe is just too much.[close]
haha, it's like you come around once again, as i said before you are being stubborn and reiterating the same point without taking into account much of what i've reiterated through everything
i disagreed with your idea hacks could be proven through video footage and gave several points on it, repeating myself several times why
i would say the most valid point was how new these hacks are to the community, there was not much knowledge on it prior (i did not know altering hitboxes/altering stab speed existed)
if the community has little to no knowledge of certain hacks, there would be doubt they even exist as they are unknown
with that, a video exposing, ill categorize them as "unknown/lesser known hacks," would not be sufficient as the doubt whether the hacks even exist remains
if there's doubt, there is not much you can really do, it will not look convincing to the community
that's why its much simpler (easier, in our minds) to get information on it from the direct source or distributor, of these hacks (Mercenary_Frank)
in the beginning, there was an accusation from you claiming movement and i accused matt in the first place with the underlying motive of "personal salt," you do not need to lie and misinterpret the statement as otherwise after i brought that up.If you're going to accuse someone of hacking, at least bring the only real credible evidence, a video. Otherwise, it just looks like salt.
I genuinely could not care less what some shady dude who sells hacks says.
movement and i were the ones attempting to provide 'real credible evidence.'
you're directing this not at bill, as he was not the one throwing out the 'real credible evidence.'
that was directed as us, movement and i.
bill had no association with movement or i through this, he only heard about the accusations and felt the need to give his personal insight on what he thought of the entire situation.
at no point did movement or i also use bill as 'real credible evidence' we brought forward, this is another thing you have assumed.
none of my or movements posts presenting evidence on the matter even contained bill within them, i guess your assumptions got ahead of you there :(You're going to need to bring something better than that one time a guy [Bill] who accuses people who don't hack of hacking, made a video accusing someone of hacking. There is a certain credibility element to take into account.
you also accused movement and i of not giving a video after i explained why we found the difficulty/inefficiency of providing a video, which i stated was speculation/assumption of how we think/thoughtYou and movement concluding there's no accurate way to prove someone's hacking through video footage sounds like a convenient way to dodge having to post any significant evidence. As I said before, the receipt was nonsensical garbage that doesn't prove anything.
you think you know how we think.
that's where you're wrong and i pointed that out a while ago.
i explained why it would be considered obsolete as there are many ways to manipulate what goes into videos, (ie: toggle-able abilities, off camera type stuff) it does not paint the full picture
now you can question my intelligence and downplay my argument as if it is not of value and act like the intelligent superior, but if you are questioning my intelligence and playing the intelligence card, why are you even responding to me for so much and so long ::)
i guess claiming another argument is "cringe" and "enough fse for one night" is valid to make an exit, fair enough perspective-wise but w/e. :-X
in the beginning, there was an accusation from you claiming movement and i accused matt in the first place with the underlying motive of "personal salt," you do not need to lie and misinterpret the statement as otherwise after i brought that up.
movement and i were the ones attempting to provide 'real credible evidence.'
you're directing this not at bill, as he was not the one throwing out the 'real credible evidence.'
that was directed as us, movement and i.
bill had no association with movement or i through this, he only heard about the accusations and felt the need to give his personal insight on what he thought of the entire situation.
at no point did movement or i also use bill as 'real credible evidence' we brought forward, this is another thing you have assumed.
none of my or movements posts presenting evidence on the matter even contained bill within them, i guess your assumptions got ahead of you there :(
you think you know how we think.
that's where you're wrong and i pointed that out a while ago.
now you can question my intelligence and downplay my argument as if it is not of value and act like the intelligent superior, but if you are questioning my intelligence and playing the intelligence card, why are you even responding to me for so much and so long ::)
i guess claiming another argument is "cringe" and "enough fse for one night" is valid to make an exit, fair enough perspective-wise but w/e. :-X
I can't be bothered with reading any of this but it's virtually impossible to prove anyone's cheating (unless MAYBE it's with certain POV recordings) in terms of autoblock or whatever, enjoy.U're cheating
Imagine hacking in the first place
Imagine getting baited into writing paragraphs about something as dumb as hacking in mount and blade of all games
This is why your reading comprehension and general intelligence level concerns me. You made a post to make yourself feel smart but you really just made yourself look like an even bigger idiot, like I told you you would.SpoilerSpoilerlol.
so claiming what other's think based upon the evidence they believed was credible in their minds upon submission and empirical observation amongst themselves that drove them to find said evidence, means it's a fact to highlight it as "salt."
it's like you're psychic and can automatically read our minds.
if we were salty, we would know about it within ourselves.
but throughout the entire incident our underlying motive was to find the truth, we believed we did, why we submitted what we believed was for the public to see.
but i guess that can be scrutinized very much and labeled as nothing other than "salt."
it's like as if any attempt we make is shot down regardless, utterly, this has not been the first time matt has been accused, the 4th time to be exact.
in my personal opinion, im not so sure how a video would prove a person of hacking with the "full package contents" as i have just learned all of these terms/hacks existed for warband
it's something no one has really heard of or seen before, publicly.
many just would never know how to tell, and that doubt is what would make that hypothetical video obsolete, in our minds it seemed much more incriminating to ask the direct source for info, rather than make a video being at high risk ( in our minds) of being scrutinized and taken with disbelief.
i cant speak for movement, but this is my personal opinion on all of this
im sure all of you can put together what i think about matt through all of this
_________________________________________________________________________________
ive probably typed 5+ essays out of this entire fiasco
My god, I'm actually concerned for your reading comprehension and general level of intelligence.
"If you're going to accuse someone of hacking, at least bring the only real credible evidence, a video. Otherwise, it just looks like salt." <- That's the statement you're so hung up on.
This was a general statement, not directed at anyone, but applicable to everyone (if I'm being honest, if I had anyone in mind when making that statement, it was Bill). Stating that if someone (anyone) is going to accuse some else of hacking, they should provide solid evidence. Otherwise, their accusation just looks like them being salty. That's just a fact of how their accusation will be perceived. I literally already explained this in another post, which just makes this worse.
Now, instead of doing your best impression of a smart man like you did above, actually use your brain, take in what I'm saying and shut the fuck up. Have some self awareness and realize how stupid you're making yourself look.
That's enough fse for me tonight, the cringe is just too much.[close]
haha, it's like you come around once again, as i said before you are being stubborn and reiterating the same point without taking into account much of what i've reiterated through everything
i disagreed with your idea hacks could be proven through video footage and gave several points on it, repeating myself several times why
i would say the most valid point was how new these hacks are to the community, there was not much knowledge on it prior (i did not know altering hitboxes/altering stab speed existed)
if the community has little to no knowledge of certain hacks, there would be doubt they even exist as they are unknown
with that, a video exposing, ill categorize them as "unknown/lesser known hacks," would not be sufficient as the doubt whether the hacks even exist remains
if there's doubt, there is not much you can really do, it will not look convincing to the community
that's why its much simpler (easier, in our minds) to get information on it from the direct source or distributor, of these hacks (Mercenary_Frank)
in the beginning, there was an accusation from you claiming movement and i accused matt in the first place with the underlying motive of "personal salt," you do not need to lie and misinterpret the statement as otherwise after i brought that up.If you're going to accuse someone of hacking, at least bring the only real credible evidence, a video. Otherwise, it just looks like salt.
I genuinely could not care less what some shady dude who sells hacks says.
movement and i were the ones attempting to provide 'real credible evidence.'
you're directing this not at bill, as he was not the one throwing out the 'real credible evidence.'
that was directed as us, movement and i.
bill had no association with movement or i through this, he only heard about the accusations and felt the need to give his personal insight on what he thought of the entire situation.
at no point did movement or i also use bill as 'real credible evidence' we brought forward, this is another thing you have assumed.
none of my or movements posts presenting evidence on the matter even contained bill within them, i guess your assumptions got ahead of you there :(You're going to need to bring something better than that one time a guy [Bill] who accuses people who don't hack of hacking, made a video accusing someone of hacking. There is a certain credibility element to take into account.
you also accused movement and i of not giving a video after i explained why we found the difficulty/inefficiency of providing a video, which i stated was speculation/assumption of how we think/thoughtYou and movement concluding there's no accurate way to prove someone's hacking through video footage sounds like a convenient way to dodge having to post any significant evidence. As I said before, the receipt was nonsensical garbage that doesn't prove anything.
you think you know how we think.
that's where you're wrong and i pointed that out a while ago.
i explained why it would be considered obsolete as there are many ways to manipulate what goes into videos, (ie: toggle-able abilities, off camera type stuff) it does not paint the full picture
now you can question my intelligence and downplay my argument as if it is not of value and act like the intelligent superior, but if you are questioning my intelligence and playing the intelligence card, why are you even responding to me for so much and so long ::)
i guess claiming another argument is "cringe" and "enough fse for one night" is valid to make an exit, fair enough perspective-wise but w/e. :-X[close]in the beginning, there was an accusation from you claiming movement and i accused matt in the first place with the underlying motive of "personal salt," you do not need to lie and misinterpret the statement as otherwise after i brought that up.
At no point did I make that accusation. I made a general statement that if people are going to accuse someone of hacking, they had best use solid evidence, or else they'll just look salty.
Firstly, I can't misinterpret my own statement, I made the statement, I know how it's supposed to be interpreted, YOU misinterpreted my statement. The sheer arrogance and stupidity you display by claiming I misinterpreted my own statement, and you've got it right, is honestly a level of delusional I had not previously considered I'd have to deal with.
Secondly, why do you think I would feel the need to lie, just because you brought it up? I didn't say any of my other statements weren't directed at you once you brought them up. I have no problem directing statements at you. You're an idiot.movement and i were the ones attempting to provide 'real credible evidence.'
you're directing this not at bill, as he was not the one throwing out the 'real credible evidence.'
that was directed as us, movement and i.
bill had no association with movement or i through this, he only heard about the accusations and felt the need to give his personal insight on what he thought of the entire situation.
This is why reading comprehension is important. I didn't say I was directing it at Bill. I said I had Bill on my mind when I wrote it, because he's the perfect example of someone who throws out accusations without any proof, and ends up looking like a salty kid as a result. He was it's inspiration, not it's target. I was cautioning people to not be like that.
No, it wasn't directed specifically at you or movement. I've said it enough, it was a general statement.
Good for Bill.at no point did movement or i also use bill as 'real credible evidence' we brought forward, this is another thing you have assumed.none of my or movements posts presenting evidence on the matter even contained bill within them, i guess your assumptions got ahead of you there :(
The irony of these two statements is hilarious and honestly are the perfect example of your stupidity.
Where did I say you guys used Bill as real credible evidence? Or presented evidence containing Bill within them? That's right kids. I didn't. I only said Bill was who I was thinking of when making the statement you're so concerned with. You assumed the wrong thing here friend.you think you know how we think.
that's where you're wrong and i pointed that out a while ago.
This is pure cringe right here. Do you have a quote for me saying this...or is it another dumb ass assumption? Cause I don't remember saying this.now you can question my intelligence and downplay my argument as if it is not of value and act like the intelligent superior, but if you are questioning my intelligence and playing the intelligence card, why are you even responding to me for so much and so long ::)
I don't NEED to (but I will) do any of that, your lack of intelligence and value in your arguments are PAINFULLY obvious to everyone, like fuck you're actually so stupid. Sorry if I'm saying this a lot, but it is both staggering and astounding how stupid you are. Why do I keep responding to you? I've just never seen someone say so much stupid shit and not realize it, I'm curious how long it can go one before you become self aware and stop.
Most of your post isn't even relevant to what you were responding to. All of that toggling and video talk came AFTER I made the post that has you bent so far out of shape (which is why I'm not bothering to respond to those parts).i guess claiming another argument is "cringe" and "enough fse for one night" is valid to make an exit, fair enough perspective-wise but w/e. :-X
Not like it's some baseless claim, you have been incredibly cringe. I was actually going to stay off until Risk told me you responded, and then I saw how stupid it was. Now we're here.
Anyways, in conclusion, for the last time, it was a general statement I made and wasn't specifically directed at you, or movement, or even Bill. BUT, if you're really this determined to be a little bitch and take it personally, by all means, go ahead and be a little bitch.
And if you choose to keep responding, that's fine, it's entertaining, like watching a car crash compilation. You're just hurting yourself at this point.
Since you boys are just insulting eachother at this point, I'll make a nice conclusion for all people passing by :)
-the given evidence is not sufficient as it can too easily be faked.
-even if the chat logs are real it is impossible to tell if Frank is joking or not, and it is impossible to tell if the MATT mentioned in his documentation is this MATT.
-video evidence is completely useless as it is not objective enough to provide a definitive answer. Video's provided by MATT himself are not sufficient as they can easily be edited/MATT can turn his cheats off.
-As fwuffy stated it is useless to discuss this as conclusive and definitive evidence is impossible to find. The only real way would be to gain physical acces to his pc, as he is doing something fishy in game. Aka raid his fucking house before he can turn his cheats off/delete them. Or if the warband client had some intrusive anti-cheat system such as ESEA for csgo. As neither of these things are likely to ever happen with a suspected cheater, it is impossible to prove cheats.
-until credible objective evidence surfaces there is nothing incriminating MATT regardless of how much of an arrogant and insufferable prick he is.
/thread
SpoilerThis is why your reading comprehension and general intelligence level concerns me. You made a post to make yourself feel smart but you really just made yourself look like an even bigger idiot, like I told you you would.SpoilerSpoilerlol.
so claiming what other's think based upon the evidence they believed was credible in their minds upon submission and empirical observation amongst themselves that drove them to find said evidence, means it's a fact to highlight it as "salt."
it's like you're psychic and can automatically read our minds.
if we were salty, we would know about it within ourselves.
but throughout the entire incident our underlying motive was to find the truth, we believed we did, why we submitted what we believed was for the public to see.
but i guess that can be scrutinized very much and labeled as nothing other than "salt."
it's like as if any attempt we make is shot down regardless, utterly, this has not been the first time matt has been accused, the 4th time to be exact.
in my personal opinion, im not so sure how a video would prove a person of hacking with the "full package contents" as i have just learned all of these terms/hacks existed for warband
it's something no one has really heard of or seen before, publicly.
many just would never know how to tell, and that doubt is what would make that hypothetical video obsolete, in our minds it seemed much more incriminating to ask the direct source for info, rather than make a video being at high risk ( in our minds) of being scrutinized and taken with disbelief.
i cant speak for movement, but this is my personal opinion on all of this
im sure all of you can put together what i think about matt through all of this
_________________________________________________________________________________
ive probably typed 5+ essays out of this entire fiasco
My god, I'm actually concerned for your reading comprehension and general level of intelligence.
"If you're going to accuse someone of hacking, at least bring the only real credible evidence, a video. Otherwise, it just looks like salt." <- That's the statement you're so hung up on.
This was a general statement, not directed at anyone, but applicable to everyone (if I'm being honest, if I had anyone in mind when making that statement, it was Bill). Stating that if someone (anyone) is going to accuse some else of hacking, they should provide solid evidence. Otherwise, their accusation just looks like them being salty. That's just a fact of how their accusation will be perceived. I literally already explained this in another post, which just makes this worse.
Now, instead of doing your best impression of a smart man like you did above, actually use your brain, take in what I'm saying and shut the fuck up. Have some self awareness and realize how stupid you're making yourself look.
That's enough fse for me tonight, the cringe is just too much.[close]
haha, it's like you come around once again, as i said before you are being stubborn and reiterating the same point without taking into account much of what i've reiterated through everything
i disagreed with your idea hacks could be proven through video footage and gave several points on it, repeating myself several times why
i would say the most valid point was how new these hacks are to the community, there was not much knowledge on it prior (i did not know altering hitboxes/altering stab speed existed)
if the community has little to no knowledge of certain hacks, there would be doubt they even exist as they are unknown
with that, a video exposing, ill categorize them as "unknown/lesser known hacks," would not be sufficient as the doubt whether the hacks even exist remains
if there's doubt, there is not much you can really do, it will not look convincing to the community
that's why its much simpler (easier, in our minds) to get information on it from the direct source or distributor, of these hacks (Mercenary_Frank)
in the beginning, there was an accusation from you claiming movement and i accused matt in the first place with the underlying motive of "personal salt," you do not need to lie and misinterpret the statement as otherwise after i brought that up.If you're going to accuse someone of hacking, at least bring the only real credible evidence, a video. Otherwise, it just looks like salt.
I genuinely could not care less what some shady dude who sells hacks says.
movement and i were the ones attempting to provide 'real credible evidence.'
you're directing this not at bill, as he was not the one throwing out the 'real credible evidence.'
that was directed as us, movement and i.
bill had no association with movement or i through this, he only heard about the accusations and felt the need to give his personal insight on what he thought of the entire situation.
at no point did movement or i also use bill as 'real credible evidence' we brought forward, this is another thing you have assumed.
none of my or movements posts presenting evidence on the matter even contained bill within them, i guess your assumptions got ahead of you there :(You're going to need to bring something better than that one time a guy [Bill] who accuses people who don't hack of hacking, made a video accusing someone of hacking. There is a certain credibility element to take into account.
you also accused movement and i of not giving a video after i explained why we found the difficulty/inefficiency of providing a video, which i stated was speculation/assumption of how we think/thoughtYou and movement concluding there's no accurate way to prove someone's hacking through video footage sounds like a convenient way to dodge having to post any significant evidence. As I said before, the receipt was nonsensical garbage that doesn't prove anything.
you think you know how we think.
that's where you're wrong and i pointed that out a while ago.
i explained why it would be considered obsolete as there are many ways to manipulate what goes into videos, (ie: toggle-able abilities, off camera type stuff) it does not paint the full picture
now you can question my intelligence and downplay my argument as if it is not of value and act like the intelligent superior, but if you are questioning my intelligence and playing the intelligence card, why are you even responding to me for so much and so long ::)
i guess claiming another argument is "cringe" and "enough fse for one night" is valid to make an exit, fair enough perspective-wise but w/e. :-X[close]in the beginning, there was an accusation from you claiming movement and i accused matt in the first place with the underlying motive of "personal salt," you do not need to lie and misinterpret the statement as otherwise after i brought that up.
At no point did I make that accusation. I made a general statement that if people are going to accuse someone of hacking, they had best use solid evidence, or else they'll just look salty.
Firstly, I can't misinterpret my own statement, I made the statement, I know how it's supposed to be interpreted, YOU misinterpreted my statement. The sheer arrogance and stupidity you display by claiming I misinterpreted my own statement, and you've got it right, is honestly a level of delusional I had not previously considered I'd have to deal with.
Secondly, why do you think I would feel the need to lie, just because you brought it up? I didn't say any of my other statements weren't directed at you once you brought them up. I have no problem directing statements at you. You're an idiot.movement and i were the ones attempting to provide 'real credible evidence.'
you're directing this not at bill, as he was not the one throwing out the 'real credible evidence.'
that was directed as us, movement and i.
bill had no association with movement or i through this, he only heard about the accusations and felt the need to give his personal insight on what he thought of the entire situation.
This is why reading comprehension is important. I didn't say I was directing it at Bill. I said I had Bill on my mind when I wrote it, because he's the perfect example of someone who throws out accusations without any proof, and ends up looking like a salty kid as a result. He was it's inspiration, not it's target. I was cautioning people to not be like that.
No, it wasn't directed specifically at you or movement. I've said it enough, it was a general statement.
Good for Bill.at no point did movement or i also use bill as 'real credible evidence' we brought forward, this is another thing you have assumed.none of my or movements posts presenting evidence on the matter even contained bill within them, i guess your assumptions got ahead of you there :(
The irony of these two statements is hilarious and honestly are the perfect example of your stupidity.
Where did I say you guys used Bill as real credible evidence? Or presented evidence containing Bill within them? That's right kids. I didn't. I only said Bill was who I was thinking of when making the statement you're so concerned with. You assumed the wrong thing here friend.you think you know how we think.
that's where you're wrong and i pointed that out a while ago.
This is pure cringe right here. Do you have a quote for me saying this...or is it another dumb ass assumption? Cause I don't remember saying this.now you can question my intelligence and downplay my argument as if it is not of value and act like the intelligent superior, but if you are questioning my intelligence and playing the intelligence card, why are you even responding to me for so much and so long ::)
I don't NEED to (but I will) do any of that, your lack of intelligence and value in your arguments are PAINFULLY obvious to everyone, like fuck you're actually so stupid. Sorry if I'm saying this a lot, but it is both staggering and astounding how stupid you are. Why do I keep responding to you? I've just never seen someone say so much stupid shit and not realize it, I'm curious how long it can go one before you become self aware and stop.
Most of your post isn't even relevant to what you were responding to. All of that toggling and video talk came AFTER I made the post that has you bent so far out of shape (which is why I'm not bothering to respond to those parts).i guess claiming another argument is "cringe" and "enough fse for one night" is valid to make an exit, fair enough perspective-wise but w/e. :-X
Not like it's some baseless claim, you have been incredibly cringe. I was actually going to stay off until Risk told me you responded, and then I saw how stupid it was. Now we're here.
Anyways, in conclusion, for the last time, it was a general statement I made and wasn't specifically directed at you, or movement, or even Bill. BUT, if you're really this determined to be a little bitch and take it personally, by all means, go ahead and be a little bitch.
And if you choose to keep responding, that's fine, it's entertaining, like watching a car crash compilation. You're just hurting yourself at this point.[close]
lol, you haven't really examined what i said but reiterated the same thing, just in different wording (as i said before, its the stubborn trait)
this is like when vetro tries to sneak diss and once you press him about it he uses the "i made the statement so i can interpret it anyway i want, the way you interpret it is a misinterpretation"
you are displaying some vetro-esque qualities, but enough of that
When Sun's loses an argument he always brings me into it so he can try something else to get out of his hole. My god you're a loser.
Still really not sure where winters fits into all thisWinters is Vetro's dad basically
Always had him pegged for an orphan. No offense vetroStill really not sure where winters fits into all thisWinters is Vetro's dad basically
Always had him pegged for an orphan. No offense vetroStill really not sure where winters fits into all thisWinters is Vetro's dad basically
Still really not sure where winters fits into all thisThis is also my question
Still really not sure where winters fits into all thisLet me lay it out for you in a manner that is digestive and based (somewhat) on fact based, empirical evidence.
Still really not sure where winters fits into all thisLet me lay it out for you in a manner that is digestive and based (somewhat) on fact based, empirical evidence.
Judging from the photos I have received from Vetro in the past several years, I can estimate that his BMI averages out somewhere between a 29,9 to a 35 (the normal range is an 18,5 to a 24,9), so he is already wayyyyy over where he needs to be in order to be considered physically fit for long term, strenuous tasks of manual labor. To add on top of that, his situation is only deteriorating. Constant anger outbursts, lack of cognitive ability, and a sudden slur of speech are major indicators of a serious health condition.
The prognosis could be good (a minor migraine, gastroesophageal reflux disease, arrhythmia, etc...), or it good be an indicator of something far more grim (benign tumor pressing against his frontal lobe, hypertension leading to narrow blood vessels, or an inflamed appendix on the verge of bursting). I digress however, with my main concern being that all of these factors may contribute to the uncertainty of a myocardial infarction.
My reasoning behind this possibility is that Vetro gets mad, very mad, far too often. This can put great stress on the heart, leading to a variety of chemicals rushing through the brain that trigger negative reactions throughout the body, especially for a man of his size. The anger that he expresses results in an increased heart rate, accelerating the amount of blood needed for the body to maintain at a conscious functioning level. Now, considering his diet (which by observation alone indicates is NOT healthy) has been continued for an extensive period, this can lead to serious plaque buildup in his arteries, high blood pressure, and an increased chance of a pulmonary embolism (blood clot that blocks crucial air flow from the lungs).
My main goal here is to try and keep Vetro calm through my own methods, as I have been able to deduce his sexual preferences (of which I will not be getting into) through over 200 hours of discussion with him on a variety of topics. I've carefully constructed a method of conversation that releases serotonin and dopamine (neurotransmitters commonly associated with joy and happiness) at just the right amount that it eases tension in his body. So really I'm just making sure Vetro doesn't head straight off a cliff, and as for his diet, that is wholly his responsibility (I've already tried to reason with him on it, but no progress has ever been made).
Also this strain of weed, affectionately called Pineapple Express, is really amazing stuff. It has a sweet mix of tropical flavors that include guava, apple, pineapple, mango, and many more! It's highly relaxing, although I'd advise you drink water in short bursts, as your mouth will feel like the Mojave during July. Highly recommend, go check it out on Leafly!
Winters' cognitive ability while baked is really impressive tbh
Winters' cognitive ability while baked is really impressive tbh
Winters' cognitive ability while baked is really impressive tbh
thats what being baked does it makes you more creative
Winters' cognitive ability while baked is really impressive tbh
Winters' cognitive ability while baked is really impressive tbh
I didn't realize this was a Dr. Phil episode.Dr Phil is a psychologist not a physician you six piece Chicken Mcfuckstick
Hmmm, so I got kind of invested in this thread after reading the essays and did some digging.I love that you still have that cat as your avatar. Was that BabyJ's cat? I don't remember. I just remember everyone made their profile picture that cat
1) I downloaded an autoblocker off a hacking site and tried it out. The one I got is very basic, where you have to manually block in time but it'll automatically go in the right direction. That's almost impossible to detect because it doesn't make you perfect but obviously gives you a massive advantage over normal players.
2) There are loads of users with long NW related posting histories on those hacking forums, so I assume that there are plenty of people well known in this community who use hacks. It's not just random, casual players.
3) From what I can see there's not enough evidence to prove the allegations so MATT remains innocent until proven guilty.
I strongly suspect that there are plenty of people getting 'help' from basic, lightweight hacking tools like the one I tried. They won't make you immortal (and therefore easy to spot) but will massively improve your k/d ratio.
it was dans catHmmm, so I got kind of invested in this thread after reading the essays and did some digging.I love that you still have that cat as your avatar. Was that BabyJ's cat? I don't remember. I just remember everyone made their profile picture that cat
1) I downloaded an autoblocker off a hacking site and tried it out. The one I got is very basic, where you have to manually block in time but it'll automatically go in the right direction. That's almost impossible to detect because it doesn't make you perfect but obviously gives you a massive advantage over normal players.
2) There are loads of users with long NW related posting histories on those hacking forums, so I assume that there are plenty of people well known in this community who use hacks. It's not just random, casual players.
3) From what I can see there's not enough evidence to prove the allegations so MATT remains innocent until proven guilty.
I strongly suspect that there are plenty of people getting 'help' from basic, lightweight hacking tools like the one I tried. They won't make you immortal (and therefore easy to spot) but will massively improve your k/d ratio.
Oh yeahit was dans catHmmm, so I got kind of invested in this thread after reading the essays and did some digging.I love that you still have that cat as your avatar. Was that BabyJ's cat? I don't remember. I just remember everyone made their profile picture that cat
1) I downloaded an autoblocker off a hacking site and tried it out. The one I got is very basic, where you have to manually block in time but it'll automatically go in the right direction. That's almost impossible to detect because it doesn't make you perfect but obviously gives you a massive advantage over normal players.
2) There are loads of users with long NW related posting histories on those hacking forums, so I assume that there are plenty of people well known in this community who use hacks. It's not just random, casual players.
3) From what I can see there's not enough evidence to prove the allegations so MATT remains innocent until proven guilty.
I strongly suspect that there are plenty of people getting 'help' from basic, lightweight hacking tools like the one I tried. They won't make you immortal (and therefore easy to spot) but will massively improve your k/d ratio.
Hmmm, so I got kind of invested in this thread after reading the essays and did some digging.
1) I downloaded an autoblocker off a hacking site and tried it out. The one I got is very basic, where you have to manually block in time but it'll automatically go in the right direction. That's almost impossible to detect because it doesn't make you perfect but obviously gives you a massive advantage over normal players.
2) There are loads of users with long NW related posting histories on those hacking forums, so I assume that there are plenty of people well known in this community who use hacks. It's not just random, casual players.
3) From what I can see there's not enough evidence to prove the allegations so MATT remains innocent until proven guilty.
I strongly suspect that there are plenty of people getting 'help' from basic, lightweight hacking tools like the one I tried. They won't make you immortal (and therefore easy to spot) but will massively improve your k/d ratio.